Ahmad Zamri Khairani. (2017). Assessing urban and rural teachers’ competencies in
STEM integrated education in Malaysia. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 87,
p. 04004). Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20178704004
Aminah Ayob, Ong, E. T., Mazlini Adnan, Mohd Nasir Ibrahim, Jameyah Sheriff, & Noriah Mohd Ishak.
(2015). Laporan STEM untuk Permata Negara, Kurikulum Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak 2015. Tanjung
Malim.
Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Teaching Thinking Skills in Context- Based
Learning: Teachers’ Challenges and Assessment Knowledge. Journal of Science Education and
Technology, 21(2), 207–225. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9302-7
Azian T. S. Abdullah, Muhammad Zaini Mohd Zain, Nair, S. G., Rusliza Abdullah, & Ihsan Ismail.
(2016). PISA : Malaysia’s wake up call for a more balanced approach to educational delivery and
attainment. In What can PISA 2012 data tell Us? (pp. 1– 15). Singapore: Sense Publisher.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014a). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran - Sains Tahun
Enam. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014b). Elemen KBAT dalam pentaksiran.
Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014c). Elemen KBAT dalam Sumber.Putrajaya: Kemeneterian
Pendidikan Malaysia
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2014d). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi: Aplikasi di
Sekolah.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016a). Buku penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah
(KSSM). Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016b). Panduan pelaksanaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran berasaskan
inkuiri. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016c). Sharing Malaysian experience in participation of girls
in STEM education. Geneva, Switzerland: UNESCO
International Bureau of Education (IBE).
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017a). Manual pelaksanaan pentaksiran sekolah.
Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017b). Pentaksiran kompetensi dan literasi Sains, Matematik dan
Bacaan I ( PKLSMB I ) : Laporan awal. In Simposium TIMSS dan PISA 2017. Petaling Jaya.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017c). Siri bahan sumber Sains, Teknologi, Engineering dan
Matematik (BSTEM), BSTEM Biologi. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan
Malaysia.
Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2016a). Laporan Kebangsaan PISA 2015.
Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2016b). PISA 2015: PISA (Programme for
International Student Assessment). Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. (2017). Jerayawara Inisiatif Perkukuhan
STEM 2017; Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Sains Teknologi Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM). Putrajaya:
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helping teachers meet the
challenge. Routledge. New York: Taylor & Francis. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809921
Barak, M. (2013). Teaching engineering and technology: cognitive, knowledge and problem-solving
taxonomies. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 11(3), 316–333. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-04-2012-0020
Baran, E., Canbazoglu Bilici, S., & Mesutoglu, C. (2016). Moving STEM Beyond Schools: Students’
Perceptions About an Out-of-School STEM Education Program. International Journal of Education in
Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1),
9. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.71338
Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing
House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39– 43. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Berliner, D. C. (2004). Expert Teachers : Their Characteristics, Development and Accomplishments.
De La Teoria? A l’aula: Formacio Del Professorat Ensenyament de Las Ciències Socials., 13–28.
Bernama. (2017). Revolusi industri 4.0 mampu wujudkan 1.5 juta pekerjaan. Malaysian
Digest. Shah Alam.
Blessinger, P., & Carfora, J. M. (2015). Inquiry-based learning for science, technology,
engineering, and math (STEM) programs : a conceptual and practical resource for educators.
Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learningg, 5, 3–19. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/doi:10.1108/S2055-364120150000004001
Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10),
873. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1021/ed063p873
Borden, L. L., & Wiseman, D. (2016). Considerations From Places Where Indigenous and Western Ways
of Knowing, Being, and Doing Circulate Together: STEM as Artifact of Teaching and Learning.
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 140–152. Dicapai pada.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1166292
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom.
Virginia USA: ASCD.
Butler, A. C., Marsh, E. J., Slavinsky, J. P., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2014). Integrating cognitive
science and technology improves learning in a STEM classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2),
331–340. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9256-4
Cabe Trundle, K., Atwood, R. K., Christopher, J. E., & Sackes, M. (2010). The effect of guided
inquiry-based instruction on middle school students’ understanding of lunar concepts. Research in
Science Education, 40(3), 451–478. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9129-x
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning; An integrated
Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd ed.). Rotterdam, The
Netherlands: Sense Publisher.
Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM
project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics approach.
In STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
(STEM) approach (pp. 1–6).
Chang, P.-L., Hsu, C.-W., & Chang, P.-C. (2011). Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen
production technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(21), 14172–14179. Dicapai
pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045
Cheng, C., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision
theory.pdf, 142, 174–186.
Chin, W. (2014). The Effects of Project-Based Learning in High School Geometry.
Thesis. Department of Education.University of Hawai'i.
Chua, Y. P. (2006a). Asas statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan. Shah
Alam: McGraw- Hill Malaysia.
Chua, Y. P. (2006b). Kaedah penyelidikan. Shah Alam: McGraw- Hill Malaysia.
Clements, D., & Battista, M. (1990). Constructivist learning and teaching. The Arithmetic
Teacher, 38(1), 34–35. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-
8535.2007.00715.x
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education.
Professional Development in Education (Vol. 38). Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130
Costa, A. L. (1991). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. (Arthur,
Ed.) (Vol. 1). Virginia USA.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating
quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed, Vol. 4). Boston: Pearson Education.
Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods
Approaches. Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods
approaches. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Daly, J. C., & Cohen, J. (1978). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences,
Revised Edition. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(363), 680.
Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.2307/2286629
Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2016). 2020 Vision: Envisioning a new generation of
STEM learning research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 1–10.
Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9713-5
Donnelly, R., Fitzmaurice, M., & Centre, T. (2005). Designing Modules for Learning.
Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching, 99–110.
Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. Education
Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.
Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B., & Orady, E. A. (2014). Urban High
School Students’ IT/STEM Learning: Findings from a Collaborative Inquiry- and
Design-Based Afterschool Program. Journal of Science Education and Technology,
23(1), 116–137. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9457-5
Edy Hafizan, Mohd Shahali, Lilia, H., Mohamad Sattar, R., & Kamisah, O. (2013).
Bitara-Stem Tm Training of Trainers’ Programme : Impact on Trainers’ Knowledge
, Beliefs , Attitudes and Efficacy Towards Integrated Stem Teaching. Journal of Baltic Science
Education, 14(1), 85–96.
Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahali, Lilia Halim, Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Kamisah Osman, & Mohd Afendi
Zulkifeli. (2016). STEM Learning through Engineering Design: Impact on Middle Secondary Students’
Interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Journal of
Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1189–1211. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00667a
Fan, S. C., & Yu, K. C. (2017). How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in
engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1),
107–129. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328- x
Faridah Musa, Norlaila Mufti, Rozmel Abdul Latiff, & Maryam Mohamed Amin. (2012).
Project-based Learning (PjBL): Inculcating Soft Skills in 21st Century Workplace. Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 59(2006), 565–573. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.315
Fauzi Hussin, Jamal Ali, & Mohd Saifoul Zamzuri Noor. (2016). Kaedah penyelidikan & analisis data
SPSS (Cetakan Ke). Sintok: Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Fazilah Razali, Othman Talib, Umi Kalthom Abdul Manaf, & Siti Aishah Hassan. (2017).
A Measure of Students Motivation , Attitude and Parental Influence towards Interest in STEM Career
among Malaysian Form Four Science Stream Student. International Journal of Academic Research in
Business and Social Sciences, 7(2016), 245–264. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i14/3665
Francine, E., José, B., & Maldonado, C. (2011). IMA – CID : an integrated modeling approach for
developing educational modules, 207–239. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s13173-011-0043-5
Gallagher, M. A. (2004). A constructivist approach to integrating science , technology , and
engineering into preservice teacher education. Iowa State University.
Gallant, D. J. (2007). Science , Technology , Engineering , and Mathematics ( STEM ) Education.
Ohio: Ohio State University.
Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam penyelidikan: Amalan dan
analisis tindakan. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti
Malaya.
Glasersfeld, E. von. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. Constructivism in
Education, 3–16.
Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and
recommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, (1),
83.
Gross, K., & Gross, S. (2017). Transformation: Constructivism, Design, Thinking and
Elementary Steam. Art Education, 69(6), 36–43. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224869
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM Integration in
Middle School Life Science: Student Learning and Attitudes. Journal of Science
Education and Technology, 25(4), 550–560. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9612-x
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data
Analysis(7th Ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). How Science, Technology, Engineering,
and Mathematics (STEM) Project-Based Learning (Pbl) Affects High, Middle, and
Low Achievers Differently: the Impact of Student Factors on Achievement.
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089–1113.
Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0
Han, S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2016). How science, technology, engineering,
and mathematics project based learning affects high-need students in the U.S.
Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 157–166. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.045
Han, S., Roslinda Rosli, Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). The effect of Science,
technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project based learning (PBL) on
students’ Achievement in four mathematics topics. Journal of Turkish Science
Education, 13(Specialissue). Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10168a
Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers’
implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. Eurasia Journal
of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63–76. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a
Harris, C. J., Penuel, W. R., D’Angelo, C. M., DeBarger, A. H., Gallagher, L. P.,
Kennedy, C. A,Krajcik, J. S. (2015). Impact of project-based curriculum materials
on student learning in science: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1362–1385. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21263
Hazura Mohamed, Hairulliza Mohamad Judi, Siti Fadzilah M. Noor, & Zawiyah
M.Yusof. (2012). Jurang digital dan pendidikan di luar bandar : Tahap literasi
teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi pelajar. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information
Technology and Multimedia, 1(2), 1–13.
Hugerat, M. (2016). How teaching science using project-based learning strategies affects
the classroom learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 19(3), 1–13.
Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9212-y
Jack, B. M., & Lin, H. (2017). Making learning interesting and its application to the
science classroom. Studies in Science Education, 7267(April), 1–28. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1305543
Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach (2nd
Ed). California: Thomson Higher Education.
Jackson, S. L. (2011). Research methods : A modular approach (2nd Ed). California:
Cengage Learning.
Jamalludin Harun, & Siti Nurulwahida Mohd Zainul Abidin. (2010). Pembangunan
modul pembelajaran berbantukan video interaktif bagi pembelajaran
pengaturcaraan visual basic berdasarkan pendekatan projek.
Jang, H. (2016). Identifying 21st Century STEM Competencies Using Workplace Data.
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 284–301. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1
Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., & Rauf, R. A. A. (2014). A Review of Science, Technology,
Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999–2013: A
Malaysian Perspective. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology
Education, 10(3), 155–163. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a
Jensen, J. L., McDaniel, M. A., Woodard, S. M., & Kummer, T. A. (2014). Teaching to
the test...or testing to teach: Exams requiring higher order thinking skills encourage
greater conceptual understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 307–329.
Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9248-9
John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural Approaches to Learning and
Development: A Vygotskyian Framework. Educational Psychologist. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3103&4_4
Jones, G., Dana, T., LaFramenta, J., Adams, T. L., & Arnold, J. D. (2016). STEM TIPS:
Supporting the beginning secondary STEM teacher. TechTrends, 60(3), 272–288.
Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0052-5
Jones, H., & Twiss, B. C. (1978). Forecasting technology for planning decisions. New
York: MacMillan. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(94)02000-F
Juan, J., Jr, R., & Sulaiman, F. (2016). The effectiveness of project – based learning (Egg
Drop Project) towards students’ real world connection in learning Physics.
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 5(8), 1–6.
Kamisah Osman, Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, & Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad. (2010).
Development and validation of the Malaysian 21st century skills instrument (M-
21CSI) for science students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 599–603.
Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.204
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM
education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025.
Education, 27(1), 1–268. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015a). Buletin Anjakan. Buletin Transformasi
Pendidikan Malaysia - PPPM 2013-2025, Bil 5/2015.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015b). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) dan
Perlaksanaan KBAT di Sekolah. Buletin Anjakan. Kementerian Pendidikan
Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015c). Laporan Tahunan 2015 Pelan
Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (Vol. XXXIII). Putrajaya.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-
014-0173-7.2
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015d). Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 : Amalan Dan
Pelaksanaan Di Sekolah.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015e). Pengenalan Kepada Pisa 2015. Putajaya:
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016a). Laporan TIMSS 2015. Putrajaya:
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016b). Panduan pelaksanaan sains, teknologi,
kejuruteraan dan matematik (STEM) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran.
Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum,Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017a). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah
Sains Tingkatan Dua: Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017b). Pendidikan STEM di Sekolah.Putrajaya:
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017c). Siri bahan sumber Sains, Teknologi,
Engineering dan Matematik (BSTEM). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan
Malaysia.
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students In STEM Education.
Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.
Kim, Y., Hye-Eun, C., & Lim, G. (2015). Science curriculum changes and STEM
Education in East Asia. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Science Education in East Asia (pp.
1–629). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16390-1
Koay, S. S., & Maria Salih. (2016). Miskonsepsi Murid Terhadap Sains Dalam Item-item
TIMSS. Penang, Malaysia: Publication Unit SEAMEO RECSAM, Penang Malaysia.
Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2014). The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Instruction on 6th
Grade Turkish Students’ Achievement, Science Process Skills, and Attitudes
Toward Science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66–78. Dicapai
pada https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques. New Age
International (P) Ltd. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). CHAPTER 19 PBL Kraichik. In R. K. S. (ed).
(Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University
Press.
Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. (2014). Teaching science in elementary and middle school.
A project-based approach (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Langford, P. E. (2005). Vygotsky ’s developmental and educational psychology (First
Edit). New York: Psychology Press.
Laur, D. (2013). Authentic learning experiences, A real-world approach to Project-Based
Learning. New York: Routledge.
Lay, A., & Kamisah Osman. (2017). Developing 21 st century skills through a
Constructivist-Constructionist learning environment. K-12 STEM Education, 3(2),
205–216.
Lee, C. H., (2015). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan Modul Bio-STEM dalam pemupukan
kemahiran abad ke-21 dan peningkatan pencapaian bagi topik Nutrisi.
Thesis.Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Lee, C. H., & Kamisah Osman. (2014). Development and validation of the BTEM Module
to enhance 21st century skills. In R. P. Devadason, Zurida Ismail, & K. T. Ng (Eds.),
Empowering the future generation through science education (pp. 34–45). Penang,
Malaysia: SEAMEO RECSAM.
Lee, C. H., & Kamisah Osman. (2015). An interdisciplinary approach for Biology,
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (BTEM) to enhance 21st century skills
in Malaysia. K-12 STEM Education, 1(3), 137–147.
Lee, S., Kang, E., & Kim, H.-B. (2015). Exploring the Impact of Students’ Learning
Approach on Collaborative Group Modeling of Blood Circulation. Journal of
Science Education and Technology, 24(3–Feb), 234–255. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9509-5
Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2013). Pentaksiran Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi.
Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Lesseig, K., Nelson, T. H., Seidel, R. A., & Slavit, D. (2015). Supporting middle school
teachers’ implementation of STEM design challenges. In NARST 2015 Annual
International Conference (Vol. 116, pp. 177–188). Chicago, Illinois. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12172
Lesseig, K., Slavit, D., & Nelson, T. H. (2017). Jumping on the STEM bandwagon: How
middle grades students and teachers can benefit from STEM experiences. Middle
School Journal, 48(3), 15–24. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2017.1297663
Li, T. K., Yahaya, R., Supardy, N., & Hassan, H. A. (2014). Developing Higher Level
Questioning on Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy before Using an Inquiry-Based Science
Approach. In D. R. Peter, Z. Ismail, & N. K. Thoe (Eds.), Empowering the future
generation through science education. Penang, Malaysia: SEAMEO RECSAM.
Lombardi, M. M. (2016). Authentic Learning for the 21st Century : An Overview
Authentic Learning for the 21st Century : Educase Learning Initiatives.
Lou, S., Chuang, S.-Y., Meng, H., Yeh, R. C., Tseng, K.-H., & Chang, C.-C. (2010). A
study of project-based STEM learning for senior high school students in Taiwan. In
American Society for Engineering Education. Kentucky.
Lou, S. J., Liu, Y. H., Shih, R. C., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). The senior high school students’
learning behavioral model of STEM in PBL. International Journal of Technology
and Design Education, 21(2), 161–183. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9112-x
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantificatiom of Content Validity. Nursing
Research. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of
educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science
Education, 95(5), 877–907. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441
Mazlini Adnan, Aminah Ayob, Ong, E. T., Mohd Nasir Ibrahim, Noriah Ishak, &
Jameyah Sherrif. (2016). Memperkasa pembangunan modal insan Malaysia di
peringkat kanak- kanak : Kajian kebolehlaksanaan dan kebolehintegrasian
pendidikan STEM dalam kurikulum PERMATA Negara. GEOGRAFIA Online
Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(1), 29–36.
Miettnen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey ’s theory of
reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1),
54–72. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1080/026013700293458
Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higherorder
thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education,
37(4), 353–369. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2
Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Lilia Halim, & Zanaton Ikhsan. (2016). Using STEM integrated
approach to nurture students’ interest and 21st century skills. The Eurasia
Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 4, 313–319.
Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Lilia Halim, Zanaton Ikhsan, Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahili, &
Raifana Rosa. (2015). Impact Studies of Integrated STEM Program. International
Journal of Technical Research and Applications, 35(35), 1–5.
Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil, Saedah Siraj, Zaharah Hussin, Nurulrabihah Mat Noh, &
Ahmad Ariffin Sapar. (2017). Pengenalan asas kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam
penyelidikan rekabentuk dan pembangunan (2nd editio). Bangi: Minda Intelek
Agency.
Mohd Sahandri Gani Hamzah, Laily Paim, Sharifah Azizah Haron, & Mohd Faizal Nizam
Lee Abdullah. (2013). Buku panduan pembinaan instrumen “Anda dan
Kepenggunaan.” Tanjung Malim: Emeritus Publications
Mohd Yazid Mohd Shariff. (2013). Keberkesanan penggunaan perisian Google Sketch-
Up terhadap peningkatan pencapaian dan minat pelajar dalam subtopik Lukisan
Ortografik Tingkatan Dua. Jurnal Bahagian Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2013).
Moore, T. J., Hynes, M. M., Purzer, Ş., Glancy, A. W., Siverling, E. A., Tank, K. M.,
Guzey, S. S. (2015). STEM integration: Evidence of student learning in designbased
curricula. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2015–
Febru(February). Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044216
Moreno, N. P., Tharp, B. Z., Vogt, G., Newell, A. D., & Burnett, C. A. (2016). Preparing
Students for Middle School Through After-School STEM Activities. Journal of
Science Education and Technology. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-
016-9643-3
MOSTI. (2016). Dasar Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi Negara: Putrajaya: Kementerian
Sains,Teknologi dan Inovasi Malaysia.
Muhammad Syukri, Soewarno, S., Lilia Halim, & Lilia Ellany Mohtar. (2018). The
impact of engineering design process in teaching and learning to enhance students’
science problem-solving skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 66–75.
Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.12297
Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. D. Avison & J.
Pries-Heje. London: Sage Publications.
Murray, E. C. (2011). Implementing Higher-Order Thinking in Middle School
Mathematics Classrooms.Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology.
Museum of Science Boston. (2008). Engineering the Future : Science, Technology, and
design process: Teacher Guide. Engineering. California: Key Curriculum Press.
National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM Education. Washington, D.C.:
The National academy Press. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.17226/13158
National Research Council. (2012). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and
school (Expanded E). Washington D.C: National Academy Press. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-88415-752-6.50153-3
New York Department of Education. (2009). Project-Based Learning: Inspiring Middle
School Students to Engage in Deep and Active Learning.
Newhouse, C. P. (2017). STEM the Boredom: Engage Students in the Australian
Curriculum Using ICT with Problem-Based Learning and Assessment. Journal of
Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 44–57. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9650-4
Newman, J. L., Dantzler, J., & Coleman, A. N. (2015). Science in Action: How Middle
School Students Are Changing Their World Through STEM Service-Learning
Projects. Theory into Practice, 54(1), 47–54. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.977661
Ng, C.H, & Mazlini Adnan. (2018). Integrating STEM education through Project-Based
Inquiry Learning (PIL) in topic space among year one pupils. In IOP Conference
Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 296, p. 012020). Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012020
Nitce Isa Medina Machmudi, & Mai Shihah Abdullah. (2013). Pembelajaran Berasaskan
Projek : Takrifan , Teori dan Perbandingannya dengan Pembelajaran Berasaskan
Masalah. CREAM -Current Research in Malaysia, 2(1), 181–194.
Noor Haniza, & Effandi Zakaria. (2017). Penerapan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi
Melalui Pembelajaran Berasaskan Projek Pengajaran Sains Sekolah Rendah. STEd
2017 : Seminar on Transdisciplinary Education, 9–17.
Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan (2nd ed.). Mc-Graw Hill
Education.
Norazla Mustafa, Zaleha Ismail, Zaidatun Tasir, & Mohd Nihra Haruzuan Mohamad
Said. (2016). A meta-analysis on effective strategies for integrated STEM education.
Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4225–4288. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.8111
Nur Fadhila Baharudin. (2016). Pembinaan dan keberkesanan Modul PBM-SC2
Terhadap KBAT, Motivasi dan Refleksi Pelajar. Thesis. Universiti Pendidikan
Sultan Idris.
Nur Fadzlillah Amira Mohd Noor, Aminuddin Hassan, & Nor Aniza Ahmad. (2017).
Relationship between Emotional, Intelligence, Motivation and Logical Reasoning
towards Academic Achievement among Secondary School Students. International
Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.
Nur Farhana Ramli, & Othman Talib. (2017). Can Education Institution Implement
STEM ? From Malaysian Teachers’ View. International Journal of Academic
Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 721–732. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i3/2772
Nur Suhaidah Sukor, Kamisah Osman, & Maria Abdullah. (2010). Students’ achievement
of Malaysian 21st Century Skills in Chemistry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 9, 1256–1260. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.316
Nurashikin Muzafar. (2015). Pembinaan Modul Bio Three dan kesannya terhadap
penguasaan konsep serta kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi murid tingkatan empat.
Thesis. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Nyet, Moi Siew, Nazir Amir, & Chin, L. C. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and
in-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science.
SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1–20. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-8
Nyet Moi Siew, Goh, H., & Fauziah Sulaiman. (2016). Integrating STEM in an
engineering design process: The learning experience of rural secondary school
students in an outreach challenge program. Journal of Baltic Science Education,
15(4), 477–493.
O’loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond piagetian constructivism
toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 29(8), 791–820. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290805
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling
real-life problems (Vol. V). Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208070-
en
Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and
Learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education Ver. I, 5(6), 2320–
7388. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670
Othman Talib. (2017). SPSS: Analisis data kuantitatif untuk penyelidik muda (Cetakan
Ke). Bangi: MPWS Rich Publication.
Paiva, C. E., Barroso, E. M., Carneseca, E. C., de Padua Souza, C., Dos Santos, F. T.,
Mendoza Lopez, R. V., & Ribeiro Paiva, S. B. (2014). A critical analysis of testretest
reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative
care: a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 8. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-8
Peters-Burton, E. E., Lynch, S. J., Behrend, T. S., & Means, B. B. (2014). Inclusive STEM
high school design: 10 critical components. Theory into Practice, 53(1), 64–71.
Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.862125
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of
Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health,
30(4), 459–467. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1002/nur
Ragsdale, S. (2014). Project-based Learning as a Means for Meeting the Needs of 21st
Century Students in Common Core States. Lindewood University.
Rajendran, N. . (2017). Pengajaran dan penguasaan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi:
Teori dan amalan. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit UPSI.
Ramlan Mustapha, & Ghazali Darusalam. (2018). Aplikasi kaedah Fuzzy Delphi dalam
penyelidikan sains sosial (1st ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Richey, R. ., & Klein, J. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge
from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher
Education, 16(2), 23–38. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961473
Ritz, J. M., & Fan, S. C. (2014). STEM and technology education: international state-ofthe-
art. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), 429–451.
Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9290-z
Rohani Arbaa, Hazri Jamil, & Mohammad Zohir Ahmad. (2017). Model Bersepadu
Penerapan Kemahiran Abad ke-21 dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal
Pendidikan Malaysia, 42(1), 1–11.
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2015). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21stcentury
teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(October 2012), 8–13. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203
Saavendra, A. R., & Opfer, V. darleen. (2014). Learning 21st Century-skills Requires
21st century Teaching, 94(1), 41–44.
Sahin, A. (2015). A practice based model for STEM Teaching (1st ed.). Houstan, USA:
Sense Publisher.
STEM Students on the Stage ( SOS ): Promoting Student Voice and Choice in STEM
Education Through an Interdisciplinary , Standards-focused , Project Based
Learning Approach. Journal of STEM Education, (September), 24–34.
Sanders, M. (2012). Integrative Stem Education As “ Best Practice .” In 7th Biennial
International Technology Education Research Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 1–15).
Sangoseni, O., Hellman, M., & Hill, C. (2013). Development and Validation of a
questionnaire to assess the effect of online learning on behaviors, attitudes, and
clinical practices of physical therapists in the United States regarding evidencedbased
clinical practice. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice,
11(2), 1–12.
Sazilah Sam, & Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah. (2017). Development and evaluation
of form three mathematics i-Think module (Mi-T3) on algebraic formulae topic. In
AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1847). Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983895
Sidek Mohd Noah. (2002). Reka bentuk penyelidikan; falsafah, teori dan praktis.
Serdang, Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Sidek Mohd Noah, & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul, bagaimana membina
modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang, Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Putra
Malaysia.
Singh, S., & Yaduvanshi, S. (2015). Constructivism in Science Classroom : Why and
How. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(3), 1–5.
Sivertsen, M. L., Riley, R. W., & Robinson, S. P. (1993). State of the art transforming
ideas and learning. A guide for elementary science education. Washington D.C: US
Department of Education.
Slough, S. W., & Milam, J. O. (2013). STEM Project-Based Learning. STEM Project-
Based Learning an Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
(STEM) approach. Texas: Sense Publisher. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6
Stone-MacDonald, A., Wendell, K., Douglas, A., & Love, M. L. (2015). Engaging young
engineers teaching problem solving through STEM. Baltimore, Maryland: Paul H
Brookes Publishing Co. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1680/jdare.16.00054
Stozhko, N., Bortnik, B., Mironova, L., Tchernysheva, A., & Podshivalova, E. (2015).
Interdisciplinary project-based learning: Technology for improving student
cognition. Research in Learning Technology, 23(July). Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.27577
Sukiman Saad, Noor Shah Saad, & Mohd Uzi Dollah. (2014). Pengajaran Kemahiran
Berfikir: Persepsi Dan Amalan Guru Matematik Semasa Pengajaran Dan
Pembelajaran Di Bilik Darjah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia,
2(1), 18–36.
Taber, K. S. (2017). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting
Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 1–24.
Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Thomas, B., & Watters, J. J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian
approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development,
45, 42–53. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA:
Autodesk Foundation., 13(415), 2003. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-
009-0302-x
Thys, M., Verschaffel, L., Van Dooren, W., & Laevers, F. (2016). Investigating the
quality of project-based science and technology learning environments in
elementary school: a critical review of instruments. Studies in Science Education,
52(1), 1–27. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2015.1078575
Tsai, H. Y., Chung, C. C., & Lou, S. J. (2018). Construction and development of iSTEM
learning model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education, 14(1), 15–32. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78019
Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science,
technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning
(PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,
23(1), 87–102. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, Kamisah Osman, & Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad. (2012). M-
21CSI : A validated 21 st century skills instrument for secondary science students.
Asian Social Science, 8(16), 38–44. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n16p38
Tuan Mastura Tuan Soh, Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad, & Kamisah Osman. (2010). The
relationship of 21st century skills on students’ attitude and perception towards
physics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 546–554. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.073
Turiman, P., Jizah Omar, Adzliana Mohd Daud, & Kamisah Osman. (2012). Fostering
the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills.
Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
UNESCO. (2015). Malaysia National Education for All Review Report. World Education
Forum, 1–128.
Wan Nor Fadzilah, W. A., Nurazidawati, M. O., Lilia, H., Mohamad Sattar, R., Kamisah,
O., & Zanaton, I. (2016). Fostering students ’ 21st century skills through Project
Oriented Problem Based Learning ( POPBL ) in integrated STEM education
program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1).
Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM Integration :
Teacher Perceptions and Practice STEM Integration. Journal of Pre-College
Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), 1–13. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636
Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning.
Science Education, 75(1), 9–21. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750103
Xie, Y., Fang, M., & Shauman, K. (2015). STEM Education. Annual Review of Sociology,
41(1), 331–357. Dicapai pada https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659
Yusri Mohamad Yusop, Melati Sumari, Fatanah Mohamed, Shahriza Said, Mohd Ibrahim
K.Azeez, & Jamil, M. R. M. (2015). The needs analysis in self-concept module
development. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(1), 44–55.
Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., &
Nikanfar, A.-R. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study:
Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication.
Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. Dicapai pada
https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
Zanaton Iksan. (2007). Amalan Penyoalan Lisan Guru Kimia Dalam Pengajaran Dan
Pembelajaran Elektrokimia. Universiti Malaya.