Abdullah, A. H. & Zakaria, E., (2011). Students’ Perceptions towards the Van Hiele’s

Phases of Learning Geometry Using Geometers Sketchpad Software. Australian Journal of Basic and 

Applied Sciences, 5(7), 787-792.

 

Abdullah, A. H. & Zakaria, E. (2013). The Effects of Van Hiele’s Phase-Based Instruction using the 

Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP) on Students’ Levels of Geometric Thinking. Research Journal of Applied 

Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(5), 1652–1660.

 

Abdullah, A. H. Surif, J., Ibrahim, N. H., Ali, M. & Hamzah, A. H., (2014). The Development of 

MyGSP: An Online Resource for Teaching Mathematics Based on Geometer‟s Sketchpad (GSP). Asian 

Social Science 10(22), 227-240.

 

Allen, C. (2007). An Action Based Research Study on How Using Manipulatives will Increase Students’ 

Achievement in Mathematics. Diperolehi daripada http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499956.pdf

 

Atebe, H. U. & Schafer, M., (2008). As Soon as the Four Sides are All Equal, then the Angles Must 

be 90° each. Children's Misconceptions in Geometry. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, 

Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 47-65.

 

Boggan, M. Harper, S. & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using Manipulatives to Teach Elementary Mathematics. 

Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3(1), 1–10.

 

Boo, J. Y. & Leong, K. E. (2016). Effect of Using Logo on Pupils ’ Learning in Two- Dimensional 

Shapes. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology 4(3).

 

Chew, M. C. & Idris, N. (2012). Enhancing Students Geometric Thinking and Achievement in Solid 

Geometry, Journal of Mathematics Educations, 5(1), 15– 33.

 

Chua Y.P. (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan: Kaedah Penyelidikan. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill.

 

Chun, Y. L. & Ming, J. C. (2014). The Impacts of Virtual Manipulatives and Prior Knowledge on 

Geometry Learning Performance in Junior High School. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 

50(2), 179–201. Doi:10.2190/EC.50.2.b.

 

Clements, D. H. & Battista, M. T. (1990). Constructivist Learning and Teaching.

Arithmetic Teacher, 38, 34–35.

 

Clements, D. H. & Battista, M. T. (1992) Geometry and Spatial Reasoning. In Grouws,

D. A. (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning,

420-464. New York, NY: Macmillan.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and 

Qualitative Research (4th). Boston, MA: Pearson.

 

Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. (2005). Kamus Dewan (Edisi keempat.). Kuala Lumpur:

Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

 

Ferreira, D. and Palhares, P. (2008). Chess and Problem Solving Involving Patterns.

Journal of Montana Council of Teachers of Mathemtics and Information Age Publishing. 5 (2&3), 

249-256.

 

Halat, E. (2008). Pre-Service Elementary School and Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Van Hiele 

Levels and Gender Differences. IUMPST: The Journal, 1(3), 1–11.

 

Hock, T. T. Tarmizi, R. A., Yunus, A. S. & Ayub, A. F. (2015). Understanding the Primary School 

Students’ Van Hiele Levels of Geometry Thinking in Learning Shapes and Spaces: A Q-Methodology, 

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science

& Technology Education,11(4), 793–802. Doi: 10.12973/2015.1439a.

 

Höffler, T. N. (2010). Spatial ability: Its influence on learning with visualizations - a 

meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 245–269. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9126-7.

 

Howse, T. D. & Howse, M. E. (2014). Linking the Van Hiele Theory to Instruction.

Teaching Children Mathematics, 21(5), 304–313.

 

Hussain, S. M. (2014). Keberkesanan Pembelajaran Koperatif untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Pelajar 

dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Proceeding of the Global Summit on Education, 4-5.

 

Ismail, H. (2016, November 30). Pencapaian TIMSS 2015 meningkat. Utusan Online.

 

Idris, N. (2005). Pedagogy in Mathematics Education. Second Edition. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan 

Publicataion Sdn Bhd.

 

Idris, N. (2005). Spatial Visualization and Geometry Achievement of Form Two Students. Jurnal 

Pendidikan, 25(1), 29–40.

 

Idris, N. (2007). The Effect of Geometers’ Sketchpad on the Performance in Geometry of Malaysian 

Students’ Achievement and their Van Hiele Geometric Thinking. Malaysian Journal of Mathematical 

Sciences, 1(2), 169–180.

 

Idris, N. (2009). The Impact of Using Geometers’ Sketchpad on Malaysian Students’ Achievement and 

Van Hiele Geometric Thinking. Journal of Mathematical Sciences. 2(2), 94–107.

 

Idris, N. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill Education.

 

Ismail, M. (2011). Kaedah Penyelidikan Kuantitatif dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan 

Pustaka.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Sekolah Menengah Matematik. 

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikukulum: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2011). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah Matematik. Pusat 

Perkembangan Kurikukulum: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Sukatan Pelajaran Sekolah Menengah Matematik.  Pusat   

Perkembangan  Kurikukulum:   Kementerian   Pendidikan

Malaysia.

 

 

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2013). Spesifikasi Kurikulum Matematik Tingkatan

5. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikukulum: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Laporan TIMSS 2015. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Koh, L. L. Choy, S. K., Lai, K. L., Khaw, A. H. & Seah, A. (2008). Kesan Pembelajaran Koperatif 

terhadap Sikap dan Pencapaian Matematik bagi Murid-murid Sekolah Rendah di Sekitar bandar Kuching. 

Jurnal Penyelidikan IPBL,  8, 50-64.

 

Konting, M. M. (2005). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Kosnin, A. M. & Lok, Y. L. (2010). Keberkesanan Perisian Geometer’s Sketchpad Untuk Tajuk Pembinaan 

Geometri Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Matematik. Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Matematik. 

Diperolehi daripada http://eprints.utm.my/10239/.

 

Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia (2014). Analisis Peperiksaan Matematik.

 

Luke, J. K. (2013). The Impact of Manipulatives on Students’ Performance on Money Word Problems. 

Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 74(2–A(E)).

 

Marshall, L. & Swan, P. (2008). Exploring the Use of Mathematics Manipulative Materials : Is It 

What We Think It Is? Edu-Com International Conference.

 

Mayer, R. E. & Sims, V. K. (1994). For Whom is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?

Extensions  of  a  Dual-Coding Theory  of  Multimedia  Learning.  Journal  of Educational 

Psychology, 86(3), 389–401. Doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.389.

 

Md Hkhir, K. (2008). Hubungan kecerdasan Matematik/Logik Pelajar-pelajar Kejuruteraan Lepasan 

Politeknik Terhadap Pencapaian Akademik Di Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana, 

Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.

 

Nordin, M. S. Saud, M. S. & Bakar, Z. A. (2010). Kemahiran Visualisasi Dan Gaya Pembelajaran 

Pelajar-Pelajar Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah Daerah Johor Bahru Dalam Mata Pelajaran Lukisan 

Kejuruteraan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Seminar Majlis Dekan-Dekan Pendidikan IPTA 2010.

 

Moore, N. D. (2012). Alternative Strategies for Teaching Mathematics. Education and Human 

Development Master’s Thesis. Paper 130. University of New York.

 

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). NCTM Standards, Principles and Standard for 

School Mathematics.

 

Neo, M. Tse-Kian, K. N. & Eshaq, A. R. M. (2007). Designing Interactive Multimedia Curricula to 

Enhance Teaching and Learning in the Malaysian Classroom-from Teacher-led to Student-centered 

Experiences. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(1), 51–59.

 

Okumus, S. Hollebrands, K. (2016). High School Students’ Forming 3D Object Using Technological and 

Non-technological Tools. Proceedings of the Psychology of

Mathematics Education, 3-6.

 

 

Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 - 2025 (2013). Education, 27(1), 1–

268. Doi:10.1016/2010.08.007.

 

Rahman, A. R. A., (2008). Pendekatan Tiga Dimensi Multimedia Bagi Meningkat Kemahiran Visualisasi 

Spatial Di Kalangan Pelajar Kognitif Rendah Dalam Tajuk Pelan Dan Dongakan. Tesis Sarjana, 

Universiti Sains Malaysia.

 

Shaw, M. (2002). Manipulatives Enhance the Learning of Mathematics. Essential Characteristics of 

Effective Mathematics Instruction, 1–4.

 

Spears, A. Y. (2011). Investigating SMART Board Technology forMathematics Education to Improve the 

Learning of Digital Native Students. Thesis, Lindenwood University.

 

Steen, K. Brooks, D. & Lyon, T. (2006). The Impact of Virtual Manipulatives on First Grade Geometry 

Instruction and Learning. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(4), 373–391.

 

Tahar  M.S.  Esa  A.,  Rahim  M.B.  Baser,  J.  A.  Shuib,  S.  &  Buntat,  Y.  (2011).

Keberkesanan  Penggunaan  Cd  Interaktif  Visualisasi  Pelajar.   Journal  of Technical, Vocational 

& Engineering Educational, 3(9), 104–115.

 

Toptaş, V. Çelİk, S. dan Karaca, E. K. (2012). Pedagogical Materials Use of Primary Grade Teachers 

in Mathematics Education, Elementary Education Online, 11(4), 1121-1130.

 

Umar, I. N. & Hadi, H. A. (2000). Kesan Grafik 3D Animasi dan Grafik dan Grafik 3D Statik terhadap 

Pencapaian Pelajar yang Berbeza Kebolehan Ruang dalam Pembelajaran Unjuran Ortografik, 1st 

International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention, 818–824.

 

Usiskin, Z. (1982). Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry: School Geometry 

Project. Department of Education, University of Chicago.

 

Veloo, A. & Hashim, R. A. (2009). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan alat ukur orientasi pembelajaran 

matematik (OPM). International Journal of Management Studies, 16(1), 57–73.

 

Wahab, S. B. A., (2006). Penghasilan Bahan E-Pembelajaran bagi Topik Poligon II Untuk Pelajar 

Tingkatan Tiga Berasaskan Moodle. Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Watson, C. (2012). A Comparison of Van Hiele Levels and Final Exam Grades of Students. Thesis, The 

University of Southern Mississippi.

 

Yazid, M. (2012). Penggunaan Kit Ortho-Pro bagi Meningkatkan Kemahiran Pelajar dalam Menterjemah 

Objek ke Dalam Lukisan Unjuran Ortogorafik. MARA Innovation Journal, 1(1), 77–84.

 

Yilmaz, G. K. (2015). The Effect of Dynamic Geometry Software and Physical Manipulatives on 

Candidate Teachers’ Transformational Geometry Success. Educational Sciences: Theory Practice, 

15(5), 1417–1435. Doi:10.12738/2015.5.2610.

 

Zakaria, E. Nordin, N. & Ahmad, S.,   (2007) Trend Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran

Matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors.

 

Žilinskiene, I. & Demirbilek, M. (2015). Use of Geogebra in Primary Math Education

in Lithuania: An Exploratory Study from Teachers’ Perspective. Informatics in

Education, 14(1), 129–144. Doi: 10.15388.2015.08.