Ahmad Tarmimi Ismail, & Shahrul Kadri Ayop. (2016). Tahap Kefahaman Dan Salah
Konsep Terhadap Konsep Daya Dan Gerakan Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat. Jurnal Fizik
Malaysia, 37(1), 1090–1101.
Akarsu, B. (2012). TOCUSO: Test of Conceptual Understanding on High School Optics Topics. European
Jurnal of Physics Education, (Special Issue 2012), 53– 59.
Alwan, A. A. (2011). Misconception of heat and temperature among physics students.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 600–614.
Aminudin Ab. Rahman. (2014). Kesan Interaksi Media Pengajaran, Kaedah Belajar dan Tahap Pencapaian
Pelajar Terhadap Tahap Kefahaman Konsep Gerakan Melalui Tugasan POE. Tesis PhD, Universiti Utara
Malaysia (tidak diterbitkan)
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, D. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. 2nd
edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Aykutlu, Bezen, S., & Bayrak, C. (2015). Teacher Opinions about the Conceptual Challenges
Experienced in Teaching Physics Curriculum Topics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174,
390–405.
Azraai Othman, & Othman Talib. (2015). Tahap kefahaman asas kimia organik dalam kalangan pelajar
kolej matrikulasi aliran teknikal. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 5(2), 86–97.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of
Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural
Psychology (Vol. 1).
Burgoon, J. N., Heddle, M. L., & Duran, E. (2011). Re-Examining the Similarities Between Teacher
and Student Conceptions About Physical Science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(2),
101–114.
Chang, A. M., Chau, J. P. C., & Holroyd, E. (1999). Translation of questionnaire and
issues of equivalence. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(2), 316–322.
Chapman, D. W., & Carter, J. F. (1979). Translation Procedures for the Cross Cultural
Use of Measurement Instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(3), 71–76.
Chen, H. Y., & Boore, J. R. P. (2010). Translation and back-translation in qualitative nursing
research: Methodological review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(1–2), 234–239.
Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: asas statistik penyelidikan buku 2.
Selangor: McGraw-Hill Education (Malaysia) Sdn.Bhd.
Collins, S. (2008). Enhanced student learning through applied constructivist theory.
Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal, 2(2), 1–9.
Cresswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative
and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Damanhuri, M. I. M., Treagust, D. F., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2016). High school
students’ understanding of acid-base concepts: An ongoing challenge for teachers. International
Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(1), 9–27.
Davis.l.l. (1992). Instrument review.Getting the most from a panel of expert. Applied Nursing
Research, 5, 194-197.
Dega, B. G., Kriek, J., & Mogese, T. F. (2013a). Categorization of Alternative Conceptions in
Electricity and Magnetism: The Case of Ethiopian Undergraduate Students. Research in Science
Education, 43(5), 1891–1915.
Dega, B. G., Kriek, J., & Mogese, T. F. (2013b). Students’ conceptual change in electricity and
magnetism using simulations: A comparison of cognitive perturbation and cognitive conflict. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 50(6), 677–698.
Ding, L., & Beichner, R. J. (2009). Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions.
Physics Education Research, 5(20103), 1–17.
Engelhard, V. P., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive
electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98–115.
Georgiou, H., & Sharma, M. D. (2012). University Students’ Understanding of Thermal Physics in
Everyday Contexts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(5), 1119–1142.
Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2016). Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam
Pendidikan: Amalan dan Analisis Kajian (Ketiga). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions:
Changing Perspectives in Science Education. Studies in Science Education, 10(1), 61–98.
Gjersing L, Caplehorn J, C. T. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language,
setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology. BMC Medical
Research Methodology, 10, 13.
Halim, A., Meerah, T. S., & Halim, L. (2009). Pembinaan dan penggunaan ujian diagnostik ke arah
mengenal pasti salah konsep pelajar dalam kursus fizik kuantum. Sains Malaysiana, 38(4), 543–551.
Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college physics students.
American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1043–1048.
Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999). Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index
(CRI). Physics Education, 34(5), 294–299.
Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial Scale Development: Sample Size for Pilot Studies.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394–400.
Jong, De, Kollofel, B. (2013). Conceptual Understanding of Electrical Circuits in Secondary
Vocational Engineering Education: Combining Traditional Instruction with Inquiry Learning in a
Virtual Lab. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(3), 375–393.
Kalpana, T. (2014). A Constructivist Perspective on Teaching and Learning: A Conceptual Framework.
International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 27–29.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah: Spesifikasi kurikulum
fizik. Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum
Krejcie, R.V. dan Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational
and Psychological Measurement. 30, 607-610.
Lee Jun Hung, Fatin Aliah Phang Abdullah, & Muhammad Abd Hadi Bunyamin. (2013). Aplikasi Konsep
Fizik Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Yang Berasaskan STEM Bagi Pelajar Tingkatan Enam Atas. 2nd
International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education, (Isqae), 470–481.
Li, J. (2012). Improving Students’ Understanding of Electricity and Magnetism.
University of Pittsburgh.
Maja Planinic. (2006). Assessment of difficulties of some conceptual areas from electricity and
magnetism using the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism. American Journal of Physics,
74(12), 1143.
Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J., & Van Heuvelen, A. (2001).
Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism.
American Journal of Physics, 69(1), 12–23.
Maneesriwongul, W., & Dixon, J. K. (2004). Instrument translation process: A methods review.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(2), 175–186.
McKenna, S. P., & Doward, L. C. (2005). The translation and cultural adaptation of patient-reported
outcome measures. Value in Health, 8(2), 89–91.
Meor Ibrahim Kamarudin, & Hatimah Naim Haji Isa. (2010). Tahap Kefahaman Dan Pengaplikasian Konsep
Daya Dan Tekanan Dalam Kehidupan Seharian Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tahun Akhir Program Pendidikan
Fizik. Eprints.Utm.My, 1–8.
Mohd Yusri Ibrahim. (2010). Bimbingan Cepat: Analisis Data Penyelidikan untuk Pendidikan & Sains
Sosial (Edisi Pertama). Kuantan: Bandar Ilmu.
Mok, S. S. (2008). Murid dan Alam Belajar. Selangor: Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn.
Bhd
Mulhall, P., Mckittrick, B., & Gunstone, R. (2001). A Perspective on the Resolution of Confusions
in the Teaching of Electricity. Research in Science Education, 31, 575–587.
Noor Hamizah Hussain, Liza Abdul Latif, & Nazli Yahya. (2012). Alternative Conception about Open
and Short Circuit Concepts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56(Ictlhe), 466–473.
Nor Aida, Marlina, & Nor Hasniza. (2013). Tahap Kefahaman Konsep Daya dan Gerakan Dalam Kalangan
Pelajar Tahun Akhir Program Pendidikan Fizik , UTM. 2nd International Seminar on Quality and
Affordable Education (ISQAE 2013), (Isqae), 118–122.
Norasyikin Mohd Zaid, & Normashita Ahmad. (2007). Kesan Penggunaan Perisian Fizik Terhadap
Pemahaman Konsep daya dan Gerakan di Peringkat Sekolah Menengah. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan
Institut Perguruan Batu Lintang Tahun 2007, (October), 1–10.
Pes, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a Three-Tier Test to Assess
Misconceptions About Simple Electric Circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, (103),
208–222.
Philippi, K. H. (2010). An Examination of Student Understanding of the Use of Models in Science and
Conceptual Understanding of Electricity and Magnetism. University of New Orleans.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. New York: Orion Press.
Planinic, M., Boone, W. J., Krsnik, R., & Beilfuss, M. L. (2006). Exploring alternative conceptions
from newtonian dynamics and simple DC circuits: Links between item difficulty and item confidence.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 150–171.
Sahin, M. (2010). Effects of problem-based learning on university students’ epistemological beliefs
about physics and physics learning and conceptual understanding of Newtonian Mechanics. Journal of
Science Education and Technology, 19(3), 266–275.
Salmiza Saleh, & Haslinda Ahmad. (2015). Kajian mengenai kefahaman pelajar tingkatan Empat terhadap
konsep asas jirim dan zarah. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 30, 89–104.
Scaife, T. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2010). Student understanding of the direction of the magnetic
force on a charged particle. American Journal of Physics, 78(8), 869– 876.
Seth S., & Ngoo, L. F. (2008). Corak Gaya Kognitif Dan Tahap Penguasaan Konsep Daya Newtonian Di
Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Enam Rendah: Satu Kajian Rintis. Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains Dan
Matematik, 1–10.
Shubha, S., & Meera, B. N. (2015). Students ’ Perception of Vector Representation in the Context of
Electric Force and the Role of Simulation in Developing an Understanding. International Journal of
Social, Behavioral, Economic, Bussiness and Industrial Engineering, 9(2), 408–416.
Steinberg, W. J. (2008). Statistics alive.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sutrisno, A. D., Samsudin, A., Liliawati, W., Kaniawati, I., & Fisika, D. P. (2011).
Model Pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Dan Pemahaman Siswa Tentang Konsep Momentum
Dan Impuls. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 20(1), 38-42
Thong, W. M., & Gunstone, R. (2008). Some student conceptions of electromagnetic
induction. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 31–44.
Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force
and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture
Curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66(4), 338–352.
Turgut, U., Gurbuz, F., & Turgut, G. (2011). An investigation 10th grade students’ misconceptions
about electric current. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1965–1971.
Wong, K. W., Khairuddin, M., Maridah, H., Rashinawati, A., & Azlina, A. (2013).
Perkembangan Kanak-kanak. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford Fajar.
Yahya, N., & Lee, K.H. (2010). Kajian Terhadap Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pencapaian Pelajar
4SPP Dan 4SPF Dalam Subjek Fizik Di Universiti Teknologi Malaysia .UTM (tidak diterbitkan)
Yolas Kolcak, D., Mogol, S., & Unsal, Y. (2014). A Comparison of the Effects of Laboratory Method
and Computer Simulations to Avoid Misconceptions in Physics Education. Education and Science,
39(175), 154–171.
Zurida, I., Mohd Ali, S., & Ahmad Nurulazam, M. Z. (2005). Kesan Pengajaran Kontekstual Ke Atas
Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Fizik. Jurnal Pendidik Dan Pendidikan, 20(1995), 43–52.
Zurida Ismail, Syarifah Norhaidah Syed Idros & Mohd Ali Samsudin. (2006). Kaedah Mengajar Sains.
Pahang: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd