UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)

Usability evaluation of teacher service record book system (EBRP)

AVAILABLE Article 1410 Views
Scan QR Code to share or view item link:

Digital Assets & Download Files
Login required to access this item.
General Information Cached
Title
Usability evaluation of teacher service record book system (EBRP)
Type
Article
Main Author
Masitah Binti Romlee
Additional Authors
  • Nor Hasbiah Ubaidullah
Subject
L Education (General)
Language Code
eng
Bibliographic Details
Place of Production
Tanjong Malim
Publisher
Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
Year of publication
2019
Degree Type
Not related
Corporate Name
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract

Flood disaster that occurred in the Kuala Krai district has caused property damage and important data loss in government premises such as schools, rural clinics, and so on. Service record book is among the important documents that were also destroyed. This book is important because all information related to service management will be recorded in the book. A prototype of teacher service record book was built to help solve the problem of such information loss. Meanwhile, usability evaluation was conducted on the system to identify whether it meets user needs. Usability evaluation on the prototype was carried out using four attributes, namely efficiency, effectiveness, ease of learning, and security.

References

1. Khalid, N., Pahi, M. H., & Ahmed, U. (2016). Loosing your best talent: Can leadership retain employees? The dilemma of the banking sector of Hyderabad Sindh, Pakistan: A mediation investigation. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(3), 608-616.

2. Madrid, D., Ahmed, U., & Kumar, R. (2019). Examining the Impact of Classroom Environment on Entrepreneurship Education: Case of a Private University in Bahrain. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(1), 1-8.

3.Gaffney, G. (1999), Information & Design, Usability Techniques series Diamond Bullet Design, Inc. (2001). Usability first glossary. Retrieved February2, 2019, from http://www.usabilityfirst.com/glossary.

4. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. New York: Academic Press, Inc. Ahmad, A. R. (2014). Banjir 2014 Bakal Catat Sejarah Terburuk - Berita Semasa. Dicapai pada November 2, 2016, dari http://www.mstar.com.my/berita/beritasemasa/2014/12/27/sejarah-terburuk/.

5. Akasah, Z. A. & Doraisamy, S. V., (2015). 2014 Malaysia Flood: Impacts & Factors Contributing Towards the Restoration of Damages. Journal of Scientific Research and Development, Issue 2 (14) 2015, Pp. 53-59.

6. Rajasekar, S., Philominathanet, P. & Chinnathambi, V. (2013). Research methodology. Physics ed-ph. 14. 1-53.

7. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, San Sebastian, Spain, vol. 561 (2009) ISSN 1613- 0073, http://ceur-ws.org

8. Kruger, H. A. and Kearney, W. D. (2006). A Prototype for Assessing Information Security Awareness. Computers and Security, 25, 289-296

9. Braz, C., & Robert, J. (2006). Security and usability: the case of the user authentication methods. 199-203. 10.1145/1132736.1132768.

10. Quesenbery, W. (2001) What Does Usability Mean: Looking beyond Ease of Use. Proceeding of 48th Annual Conference-Society for Technical Communication, Chicago, 13-16 May 2001.

11. Usability Testing Basics - University of Michigan. (n.d.). Retrieved February 12, 2019, from http://webservices.itcs.umich.edu/drupal/wwwsig/sites/webservices.itcs.umich.edu. drupal.wwwsig/files/Usability-Testing-Basics.pdf

 


Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.