UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)

Promoting active learning in the ESL classroom: tertiary level students

AVAILABLE Article 1153 Views
Scan QR Code to share or view item link:

Digital Assets & Download Files
Login required to access this item.
General Information Cached
Title
Promoting active learning in the ESL classroom: tertiary level students
Type
Article
Main Author
Noor Alhusna binti Madzlan
Subject
L Education (General)
Language Code
eng
Bibliographic Details
Place of Production
Tanjong Malim
Publisher
Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
Year of publication
2019
Degree Type
Not related
Corporate Name
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract

The present study explores students’ experience in teaching English as a Second Language (ESL). Its approaches range from traditional to  interactive lectures which include e-learning tools. The purpose of different lecturing approaches is to promote active learning as part of learner-centred education, among tertiary students. This exploratory study examined responses from over 70 ESL students about their preferences in the lecturing presented to them. Results indicated that the students selected the game-based online platform, “Kahoot!”, as the best lecturing approach for understanding the course

References

1. Alahmar, A. T. (2018). The Attitude of Second Year Pharmacy Students Toward Lectures, Exams and E-Learning. Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences, 17(1).

2. Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher education research & development, 18(1), 57-75. Bulletin, 81(4), 89.

3. Cavanagh, M. (2011). Students’ experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in

4. Dingel, M. J., Wei, W., & Huq, A. (2013). Cooperative learning and peer evaluation: The effect of free riders on

5. Elen, J., Clarebout, G., Leonard, R., & Lowyck, J. (2007). Student-centred and teacher-centred learning environments: What students think. Teaching in higher education, 12(1), 105-117.

6. Emaliana, I. (2017). Teacher-centered or Student-centered Learning Approach to Promote Learning?. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 10(2), 59-70.

7. Felder, R.M. & Brent, R. (1996) Navigating the bumpy road to student-centred instruction,College Teaching, 44(2), pp. 43–47 game-based technology solution for eLearning novices. Management Teaching Review, 2(2), 151-158.

8. Hussin, A. A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education and

9. Johns, K. (2015). Engaging and assessing students with technology: a review of Kahoot!. Delta Kappa Gamma

10. Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction 7(3), 255–275.

11. Lea, S. J., D. Stephenson, and J. Troy (2003). Higher Education Students’ Attitudes to Student Centred Learning: Beyond ‘educational bulimia’. Studies in Higher Education 28(3), 321–334. lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 23-33. Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92-98. 

 


Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.