Thinking  style  pattern  among  design  and  technology teachers in Malaysia

Mohamed Nor Azhari bin Azman

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
Main Author :	Mohamed Nor Azhari bin Azman
Additional Authors :	Zaliza binti Hanapi Nurulwahida Azid Shanty Saie Tee, Tze Kiong Jailani Md Yunos Yee, Mei Heong Mimi Mohaffyza Mohamad Widad Othman
Title :	Thinking style pattern among design and technology teachers in Malaysia

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Teknikal dan Vokasional
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :	Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Critical and creative thinking skills are vital in new Malaysia curriculum starting 2011. These skills are advised to be integrated in all subjects in school. Hence, knowing the teachers thinking style can be an advantage as this can give the impression on how the students will be. This study was conducted to identify the tendency to which creative critical thinking style of Design and Technology (DT) teachers across Malaysia. A total of 367 teachers are involved and required to answer the instrument known as YPCreative-Critical Test which consist of 34 items. This instrument was develop using Google Form and been send out to the respondent through email, Facebook, WhatsApp, Telegram and Instagram application to ease the teachers to respond online. The data then analyzed using descriptive statistic and inferential statistics. The finding from this study showed that nearly half of the DT teachers having balance thinking style. Creative thinking style has 35.4% of the total while critical thinking style 19%. None of our teachers has superior thinking style. The independent t-test result shows there is no significant difference thinking styles among DT teachers in gender.

References

1. Alias, M., & Abd Hadi, B. B. (2010). The Relationship Between Creative and Critical Thinking Styles and Academics Achievements Among Post Secondary Vocational Students. Seminar Kebangsaan Jawatankuasa Penyelarasan Pendidikan Guru 2010.

2. Aloun, N. A. (2012). Web-Based Internet Mobile Application to Manage Organization. Master Thesis. UUM. Retrieved from http://etd.uum.edu.my/3297/

3. Chen, M. H., Chang, Y. Y., & Lo, Y. H. (2015). Creativity Cognitive Style, Conflict, and Career Success for Creative Entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 906–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.050

4. Chua, Y. P. (2004). Creative and Critical Thinking Styles. Serdang, Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.

5. Chua, Y. P. (2010). Building a Test to Assess Creative and Critical Thinking Simultaneously. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.062

6. Fan, J., & Zhang, L. (2014). The role of learning environments in thinking styles. Education Psychology, 34(2), 252

7. H.A.Rahman, A. H., Mat Desa, D. F., Sirin, R., Sinappan, M., Mat Rodzi, M. D., Mohd Som, S., & Yazid, Z. (2002). Kemahiran Berfikir Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. (KPM, Ed.), Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2001st ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.

8. Hamimi, K. A., & Saat, I. (2013). Kemahiran Pelestarian Pemikiran Dalam Pendidikan Sejarah. In Seminar Pendidikan Sejarah dan Geografi (Vol. 2013, pp. 29–30). UMS.

9. Hashmi, A., Shahibuddin, I., & Hazlinda, H. (2018). A Role of Thinking Styles for Innovation , A Conceptual Framework with a Critical review of Literature. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(May), 68–75.

10. Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). ACTIVITIES. Educatonal and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.

11. Li, M., & Armstrong, S. J. (2015). The Relationship Between Kolb’s Experiential Learning Styles and Big Five Personality Traits in International Managers. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 422–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.001

12. Mohd Kasran, M. H. (2016). Prosiding Seminar Penyelidikan Tindakan Pendidik Guru 2016. In M. H. Mohd Kasran (Ed.), 1 Pensyarah 1 Penyelidikan (p. 431). Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Sultan Mizan.

13. Oordt, M. van, Hills, T., & Toit, P. du. (2014). Two teachers are better than one: collaborative teaching as an approach to promote whole brain learning Mr. ML van Oordt, Miss T Hills, Dr PH du Toit. Meditari Accountancy Research, 22(2), 165–185.

14. Osterman, M. D. (2015). Exploring Relationships Between Thinking Style and Sex, Age, Academic Major, Occupation and Levels of Arts Engagement Among Professionals Working in Museums. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University, Florida International University. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/2277

15. Padget, S. (2012). Creativity and Critical Thinking for teachers in training. In Creativity and Critical Thinking (Vol. 3, pp. 1–65). Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge. https://doi.org/0415692822

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page