UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Kajian buli di Malaysia kebanyakannya menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif sebagai reka bentuk kajian. Namun, kaedah ini dilihat tidak mampu memberikan kefahaman mendalam berhubung permasalahan tersebut. Justeru, pendekatan kualitatif dijangka dapat memberikan penjelasan tentang fenomena buli secara lebih menyeluruh. Antara reka bentuk kualitatif yang boleh digunakan adalah constructivist grounded theory (CGT) yang diperkenalkan oleh Charmaz (2006). Bagi memperlihatkan pengaplikasian CGT dalam kajian buli, kertas kerja ini akan menghuraikan pengalaman Pengkaji melaksanakannya secara langkah demi langkah. Diharapkan agar perkongsian ini memberi inspirasi kepada para pengkaji untuk menerapkan pendekatan CGT dalam kajian buli mereka. |
References |
1. Abdul Malek Abdul Rahman. (2004). Kesan kaunseling kelompok latihan kemahiran sosial terhadap tingkah laku langsang buli di kalangan pelajar-pelajar sekolah menengah. Tesis PhD yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 2. Abdul Malek Abdul Rahman. (2007). The effectiveness of cognitive behaviour group counselling on bullies amongst the secondary schools students in Malaysia. Jurnal Bitara, (1) 21-32. 3. Azizi Yahaya, Yusufboon, Shahrin Hashim, Mohammad Sharif Mustafa, & Zurhana Muhamad. (2008). Indeks perlakuan buli di kalangan pelajar-pelajar sekolah menengah dan rendah di Malaysia. 4. Laporan Penyelidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Charmaz, K. (1990). ‘Discovering’ chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science & Medicine, 30 (11), 1161-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(90)90256-r masalah dan soalan kajianpengumpulan data - pengekodan awal memo awalpengumpulan data - pengekodan terfokus memo lanjutan pensampelan teoretikalpemurnian konsep pembinaan teori -integrasi memo dan konsep penulisan laporan 5. Charmaz, K. (1996). The search for meanings – Grounded theory. Dalam Smith, J.A., Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (Eds). Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage. 27-49. 6. Charmaz, K. (1996). The search for meanings – Grounded theory. Dalam Smith, J.A., Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (Eds). Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage. 27-49. 7. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and contructivist methods. Dalam Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds). The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. 509-535. 8. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage. 9. Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. Dalam Hesse-Biber, S.N., & Leavy, P. (Eds). Handbook of emergent methods. New York: The Guilford Press. 155-172. 10. Charmaz, K. (2012). The power and potential of grounded theory. A Journal of the BSA MedSoc Group, 6(3), 2-15. http://www.medicalsociologyonline.org/resources/Vol6Iss3/MSo-600x_The-Power-and-Potential-Grounded-Theory_Charmaz.pdf 11. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. (2nd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Charmaz, K. (2015b). Teaching theory construction with initial grounded theory tools: A reflection on lessons and learning. Qualitative Health Research, 25(12), 1610-1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315613982 12. Charmaz, K. (2016). Constructivist grounded theory. The Journal of Positive Psychology 12(3), 299-300. Dikongsi oleh pengarang melalui ResearchGate pada 6 Oktober 2017. 13. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. http://med-fom-familymed-research.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2012/03/W10-Corbin-and-Strauss-grounded-theory.pdf 14. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. (3rd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Gehrels, S. (2013). Grounded theory application in doctorate research. Research in Hospitality Management, 3 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/RHM.2013.3.1.3.1216 15. Glaser, B.G. (2007). Remodeling grounded theory. Historical Social Research, Supplement, 19, 47-68. http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-288341 16. Glaser, B.G. (2016). Open coding descriptions. The Grounded Theory Review, 15(2), 108-110. http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2016/12/19/open-coding-descriptions/ 17. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction. 18. Hanif Suhairi Abu Bakar. (2015) The emergence themes of cyberbullying among adolescences. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 20 (4), 393-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2014.992027 19. Holton, J.A. (2008). Grounded theory as a general research methodology. The Grounded Theory Review, 7(2). http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2008/06/30/grounded-theory-as-a-general-research-methodology/ 20. Jamalsafri Saibon, Rabiatul-Adawiyah Ahmad Rashid, Abdul Jalil Ali, & Syed Mohamad Syed Abdullah. (2012). Enhancing school children’s knowledge and awareness on bullying through the 2Bs program. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 47 (15), 68-70. 21. Jonsen, K., & Jehn, K.A. (2009). Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 4 (2), 123-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17465640910978391 22. Kamarulzaman Kamaruddin, Abu Bakar Nordin, Abdul Malek Abdul Rahman, Abd. Latif Gapor, Abd. Kadir Arifin, Amir Hasan Dawi, Normah Othman, Mohmadisa Hashim, & Ismail Abdul Raoh. (2007). Kajian ke atas Buli di Malaysia 2. Laporan Penyelidikan. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 24. Kamarulzaman Kamaruddin, Abu Bakar Nordin, Abdul Malek Abdul Rahman, Omar Abdull Kareem, Abd. Latif Gapor, Abd. Kadir Arifin, Amir Hasan Dawi, Normah Othman, Khuan Wai Bing, Muhammad Nadzir Ibrahim, Mohmadisa Hashim, Ismail Abdul Raoh, & Abdul Halim Ali. (2006). Kajian ke atas buli di Malaysia Fasa 1. Laporan Penyelidikan. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 25. Kenny, M., & Fourie, R. (2015). Contrasting Classic, Straussian, and Constructivist grounded theory: Methodological and philosophical conflicts. The Qualitative Report, 20(8), 1270-1289. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR20/8/kenny1.pdf Marzita Abdullah. (2004, 17 Februari). Kena buli: Mangsa tidak tahu mengapa. Utusan Malaysia. 26. Mazzone, A., Thornberg, R., Stefanelli, S., Cadei, L., & Caravita, S.C.S. (2018). “Judging by the cover”: A grounded theory study of bullying towards same-country and immigrant peers. Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 403-412. Dikongsi oleh pengarang melalui ResearchGate pada 16 Julai 2018. 27. Mishna, F., Saini, M., & Solomon, S. (2009). Ongoing and online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1222–1228.https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/71778/1/Mishna%2C%20Ongoing%20and%20Online.pdf 28. Morse, J.M. (2007). Sampling in grounded theory. Dalam Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory: Paperback edition. London: Sage. 229-244. 29. Noran Fauziah Yaakub, Anne Althea Christopher, Mizuar Nasruddin, Azmi Abu Samah, & Rosna Awang Hashim. (2002). Bullying among Malaysian school children: Some preliminary findings. Dlm. Noraini M. Noor, Zafar A. Ansari, & Ashiq A. Shah (pnyt.). Psychology of well-being and self-actualization. hlm. 90-106. International Islamic University Malaysia. 30. Noran Fauziah Yaakub, Fatimah Haron, & Ahmad Jazimin Jusoh. (2009). Pencegahan buli di sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd 31. Noran Fauziah Yaakub, Fatimah Haron, Zuria Mahmud, Salimah Mohd. Ali, & Louis, G.J. (2006). Hentikan buli di sekolah anda: Panduan sekolah menengah. Kuala Lumpur: Sutrapadu (M) Sdn. Bhd. 32. Noran Fauziah Yaakub, Rajendran Nagappan, & Ahmad Jazimin Jusoh. (2003). Bullying among National and National Type (Tamil and Chinese) primary school children with reference to Perak – Some preliminary findings. Proceeding on Investing in Innovation, 235-240. 33. Noran Fauziah Yaakub. (2006). Buli di sekolah: Apa yang kita tahu dan apa yang boleh kita buat. Kuala Lumpur: Sutrapadu (M) Sdn. Bhd. 34. Othman Lebar. (2006). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengenalan kepada teori dan metod. Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Othman Lebar. (2017). Penyelidikan kualitatif: Pengenalan kepada teori dan metode. (Edisi Kedua). Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 35. Ramalho, R., Adams, P., Huggard, P., & Hoare, K. (2015). Literature review and constructivist grounded theory methodology. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(3), Art. 19. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1503199 36. Ridzwan Che Rus, & Mohd Nor Azhari Azman. (2016). Pengaruh minat terhadap pembentukan pekerja berkemahiran di Malaysia: Kajian kes pelatih Institut Latihan Perindustrian 208 Kuala Lumpur (ILPKL). Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12 (3), 168–180. http://www.ukm.my/geografia/v2/index.php?cont=a&item=2&thn=2016&vol=12&issue=3&ver=loc 37. Rohana Man. (2003, 30 September). Membuli – Kenali jenis, mangsa dan pemangsa. Utusan Malaysia. Salimah Mohd. Ali, Noran Fauziah Yaakub, Zuria Mahmud, & Louis, G.J. (2006). Hentikan buli di sekolah anda: Panduan sekolah rendah. Kuala Lumpur: Sutrapadu (M) Sdn. Bhd. 38. Sarina Yusup. (2015). Parental attachment and cyberbullying among Malaysian children. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Putra Malaysia. 39. Sbaraini, A., Carter, S.M., Evans, R.W., & Blinkhorn, A. (2011). How to do a grounded theory study: A worked example of a study of dental practices. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11 (128). http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/128 40. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (2nd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 41. Suraiya Mohd Nor. (2001, 7 September). Buli gugat semangat belajar. Berita Harian. Thornberg, R., Halldin, K., Bolmsjö, N., & Petersson, A. (2013). Victimising of school bullying: A grounded theory. Research Papers in Education, (28)3, 309-329. Dikongsi oleh pengarang melalui ResearchGate pada 9 Jun 2017
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |