Abdullah, M. S., Rahman, S., & Kinabalu, K. (2014). Gaya pembelajaran dan kesedaran
metakognitif dalam kalangan pelajar aliran sains. Proceeding of the Sosial Sciences
Research ICSSR 2014, 12(123), 712–719. Retrieved from http://worldconferences.net
Abu Hassan, K. (2003). Kurikulum Sains Sekolah Malaysia, Modul Pengajaran.
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Adam, B, Mitcham., C. (2012). Ethics and Science: An Introduction. Cambridge University
Press, New York.
Albe, V. (2008a). Students‘ positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a
controversial socioscientific issue. Science and Education, 17(8–9), 805–827.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9086-6
Albe, V. (2008b). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social
considerations intersect: Students‘ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific
Issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67–90.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
Alshare, K. A. (2008). Predicting Students Usage of Internet in Two Emerging Economies
Using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Academy of Educational Leardership Journal,
12(2), 109–129.
Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D., Sarshar, M., & Newton, R. (2007). Quantitative and
qualitative research in the built environment?: application of `` mixed research approach
Dilanthi Amaratunga. Work Study, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/ 00438020210415488
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich,
P.R., Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of
Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, Longman.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice?: A Review and
Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., P.W., C., K.A., M., R.E., P., P.R., & Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.
C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
Arbuckle, J. L. (2005). AMOS 6.0 user’s guide. Spring House, PA: Amos pment
Corporation.
Assessment, I. S., Cooperation, E., Council, A., Math, I., & Study, S. Scientific
Literacy and Contexts in PISA 2006 Science (2009). https://doi.org/
10.1002/tea.20332
Babin, B. J., Hair, J. F., & Boles, J. S. (2008). Publishing research in marketing
journals using structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,
16(4), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679160401
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On The Evaluation of Structural Equation Model.
Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
Baharom Mohamad, Ali Suradin, & Za‘aBa Helmi Khamisan. (2008). Peranan Pendidikan Islam
dan Pendidikan Moral dalam Membina Sahsiah Pelajar Berkualiti. In Dalam Persidangan
Pembangunan Pelajar Peringkat Kebangsaan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (pp. 22–23).
Balakrishnan, V., Liew, T. K., & Pourgholaminejad, S. (2014). Fun Learning With Edooware
- A Social Media Enable Tool. Computers & Education.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.008
Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., … Wu, N. (2009). Learning and Scientific
Reasoning. Science, 323, 586–587. https://doi.org/10.1126/science
.1167740
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social
Psychological Research?: Conceptual , Strategic , and Statistical Considerations. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.51(6), 1173– 1182.
Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1999). Creating Contexts for Learning and Self-authorship:
Constructive-Developmental Pedagogy. Vanderbilt University Press Nashville.
Beemt, A. Van Den, & Diepstraten, I. (2016). Computers & Education Teacher perspectives
on ICT?: A learning ecology approach. Computers & Education, 92–93, 161–170.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.017
Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). Understandings of the Nature of Science and Decision Making
on Science and Technology Based Issues. Wiley Interscience, 352–377.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10063
Bencze, L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students ‘ Research-Informed Socio-
scientific Activism?: Re / Visions for a Sustainable Future, 129–148.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9260-3
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural model. Psychological
Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
Bhat, M. A. (2016). The Predictive Power of Reasoning Ability on Academic Achievement.
International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational
Research, 15(1), 79–88.
Bhutta, Z. A. (2002). Ethics in international health research?: a perspective from the developing
world *. Buletin of the World Health Organization, 80(1).
Bialek, W., & Botstein, D. (2004). Introductory Science and Mathematics Education for 21st-Century
Biologists, 303(February), 788–790.
Blissett, S., Cavalcanti, R. B., & Sibbald, M. (2012). reflection Should we teach using schemas??
Evidence from a randomised trial. In Medical Education (pp. 815– 822). Blackwell
Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012. 04311.x
Blunch, N. (2013). Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling Using IBM SPSS Statistics
and Amos. SAGE Publication Ltd.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equation with latent variables. New York: Wiley. Bonk, C. J.
(2009). The World is Open: How Web Technology Is Revolutionizing
Education. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94104; Tel: 415-433-1767,.
Breiner, J. M., Johnson, C. C., Harkness, S. S., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What Is
STEM?? A Discussion About Conceptions of STEM in Education and Partnerships.
School Science & Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11.
Brien, C. O., Hartshorne, R., Beattie, J., & Jordan, L. (2012). RSCO A Comparison of Large Lecture
, Fully Online , and Hybrid Sections of Introduction to Special Education. Rural Special
Education Quaterly, 30(4), 19–31.
Briggle, A., & Mitcham, C. (2012). Ethics and Science. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Brophy, J., & Brophy, J. (2010). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education?:
Developing appreciation for .. Toward a Model of the Value Aspects of Motivation in Education?:
Developing Appreciation for Particular Learning Domains and Activities, (February 2013), 37–41.
Byrne Barbara M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS (Second Edi).
Routledge New York London.
Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning?: Their change
through secondary school and their influence on academic performance, 203– 221.
https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X22683
Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College Students Decision-Making Tendencies in the Context of
Socioscientific Issues ( SSI ). J Korea Assoc. Science Education,
), 887–900.\
Christenson, N., & Rundgren, S.-N. C. (2014). A Framework for Teachers ‘
Assessment of Socio-scientific Argumentation?: An example using the GMO issue. Journal of
Biological Education, 9266(October), 1–10. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00219266.2014.923486
Chua Yan Piaw. (2014). Ujian Regresi, Analisis Faktor Dan Analisis SEM. Mc Graw Hill Education.
Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted Kappa: Nominal Scales Agreement With Provision For Scaled Disagreement
Or Partial Credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213–220.
https://doi.org/http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0026256
Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative Methods in Psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1),
155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Comstock, G. (2001). Ethics and genetically modified foods. Food Ethics, 183–202.
Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in
epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 29(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.
2004.01.004
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2003). Business Research Methods (8th editio).
New York: McGraw Hill.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design?: Quatitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods
Approaches. SAGE Publication, Inc.
Cronbach, L. J. (1946). Educational and Psychological Measurement. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, 6(475). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164446 00600405
Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in Bloom?: Implementing Bloom ‘ s
Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology. Life Sciences Education, 7, 368–381.
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08
Cunningham, E. (2008). A Practical Guide to Structural Equation Modelling using AMOS.
Melbourne: Statsline.
Daempfle, P. (2002). Instructional Approaches for the Improvement of Reasoning in Introductory
College Biology Courses: A Review of the Research.
Daempfle, P. (2012). Science & Society: Scientific Thought and Education for the 21st
Century. Retrieved March 7, 2016, from http://www.amazon.com/Science-
Society-Scientific-Thought-Education/dp/1449685021/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8
De Wulf, K. G., Odekerden-Schroder, & Lacobucci, D. (2001). Invesments in consumer
relationship: A cross-country and cross-industry exploration. Journal
keting, 65(4), 33–50.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research.
SAGE Publication Ltd.
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (2008). A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum
Development in Science. Studies in Science Education, (December 2014), 37– 41.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268608559933
Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2002). What sort of science education do we really need?
International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 661–679. https://doi.org/
10.1080/09500690110110133
Dunbar, K. N., & Klahr, D. (2012). Scientific Thinking and Reasoning. In The Oxford Handbook of
Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 699–718). https://doi.org/10.1093
/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0035
Dwyer, C., Hogan, M., & Stewart, I. (2011). The promotion of critical thinking skills through
argument mapping.
Ekborg, M., Ottander, C., Silfver, E., & Simon, S. (2013). Teachers‘ Experience of Working with
Socio-scientific Issues: A Large Scale and in Depth Study. Research in Science Education,
43(2), 599–617.
Elder, A. . (1999). An Exploration of Fifth Grade Students’ Epistemological Beliefs in Science and
an Investigation of Their Relation to Science Learning. University of Michigan, Michigan.
Ellison, N. B. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook ?? Friends?:‘? Social Capital and
College Students ‘ Use of Online Social Network Sites, 12, 1143–1168.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
Elm, D. R., & Weber, J. (1994). Measuring moral judgment: The Moral Judgment Interview
or the Defining Issues Test? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(5), 341– 355.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871762
Fatin, A., Salleh, A.?; M., Bilal, A. M., & Salmiza, S. (2012). Faktor penyumbang
kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran sains: satu analisis sorotan tesis. Medc2012,
17. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n3.2
Fleis, J. L. (1971). MEASURING NOMINAL SCALE AGREEMENT AMONG
MANY RATERS 1. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. https://doi.org
/http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0031619
Fleming, R. (1986). Adolescent Reasoning in Socio-Scientific Issues, Part I: Social
Cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 677–87. https://
doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230803
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor Analysis in the Develepment & Refinement
of Clinical Assessment Instrument.pdf. Psychology Assessment,
, 286–299.
Floyd J Fowler, J. (2014). Survey Research Methods. SAGE Publication, Inc.
Foong, C.-C., & Daniel, E. G. S. (2012). Students‘ Argumentation Skills across Two Socio-Scientific
Issues in a Confucian Classroom: Is transfer possible? International Journal of
Science Education, (January 2015), 1–25. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.697209
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Str Erroructural Equation Models with
unobservable variables and Measurements. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Fowler, S. R. (2009). College students use of science content during socioscientific issues
negotiation?: Impact of evolution understanding and acceptance. University of South
Florida.
Fowler, S. R., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Lack of Evolution Acceptance Inhibits Students
‘ Negotiation of Biology-based Socioscientific Issues Lack of Evolution Acceptance Inhibits
Students ‘ Negotiation of Biology-based Socioscienti fi c Issues, 9266(March).
https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1150869
Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral Sensitivity in the Context of
Socioscientific Issues in High School Science Students. International Journal of Science
Education, 31(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069
0701787909
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to Design Research in Education (3rd editio). New
York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Frankfort-Nach. (1992). Foundation of Behavioural Research. New York; St.
Martin‘s Press.
Franko, D. L., Cousineau, T. M., Trant, M., Craig, T., Rancourt, D., Thompson, D., Ciccazzo, M.
(2008). Motivation , self-ef fi cacy , physical activity and nutrition in college students?:
Randomized controlled trial of an internet-based education program, 47, 369–377.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.06.013
Frazer, L., & Lawley, M. (2000). Questionnaire Design and Administration. Brisbane, Australia: John
Wiley & Sons.
Furberg, A., & Ludvigsen, S. (2008). Students‘ Meaning? making of Socio? scientific Issues in
Computer Mediated Settings: Exploring learning through interaction trajectories.
International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09500690701543617
Gallagher, M. W., & Brown, T. A. (2013). 14 . Introduction To Confirmatory Factor Analysis and
Structural, (1), 289–314.
Garson, G. D. (2012). Structural Equation Mideling. Asheboro, NC: Statistical
sociates.
Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M. ., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning
environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal
of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 095006901750162892
Goodfellow, M., & Wade, B. (2007). The Digital Divide And First-Year Students.
J.College Student Retention, 8(4), 425–438.
Graham, J. W., Hofer, S. M., Donaldson, D. P., Mackkinnon, & Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis with
missing data in prevention research. In K. Bryant, M. Windle, &
P. West (Eds.), The Science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and
substance abuse research (pp. 325–366). Washinton , DC: American Psychological
Association.
Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2000). Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences (5th ed.).
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Gregory S. Blimling. (2016). Creating Contexts for Learning and Self-Authorship:
Constructive Developmental Pedagogy (review). The Journal of Higher Education,
73(May), 307–309. https://doi.org/10.1352/jhe.2002.0015
Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., Baumgartner, H., & Cote, J. A. (2004). Multicollinearity and Measurement
Error in Structural Equation Models?: Implications for Theory. Marketing Science, 23,
No.4(November 2014). https://doi.org/10.1287/ mksc.1040.0070
Griffiths, D. (2016). Informal Learning Recognition and Management. Computer in Human Behaviour,
55A(February), 501–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015. 10.019
Hair, Joseph F. William C. Black. Barry J. Babin, . Rolph E. Anderson. (2011).
Multivariate Analysis (seventh ed). New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Hall, J., & Sammons, P. (2013). Mediation, Moderation & Interaction. In T. T. (Ed) (Ed.), Handbook
of Quantitative Methods for Educational Research (pp. 267– 286). 2013 Sense Publishers.
Hansson, L., Redfors, A., & Rosberg, M. (2011). Students‘ Socio-Scientific
Reasoning in an Astrobiological Context During Work with a Digital Learning Environment. Journal
of Science Education and Technology, 20, 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9260-5
Hasnah Ali, Luqman Ahmad, Sanep Ahmad, & Noraziah Ali. (2009). Keperluan, Kepentingan
dan Sumbangan Perancangan Pendidikan Dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Malaysia. Jurnal of Social
Sciences and Humanities, 4(1), 13–29.
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New
Millennium. Communication Monographs, Vol.76(July 2013), 37–41.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process
Analysis. GP The Guilford Press.
Hmelo-silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C. A., Hmelo-silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C.
A. (2007). Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning?: A
Response to Kirschner , Sweller , and Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and
Inquiry Learning?: A Response to Kirschner
, Sweller , and Clark ( 2006 ), (October 2013), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 0461520701263368
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning Science, Learning about Science, Doing Science: Different
goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15).
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.899722
Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and Disciplinary Differences in Personal
Epistemology. Contemporry Educational Psychology, 405, 378–405. https://
doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1026
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About
Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning. Review of Educational Research,
67(spring 1997), 88–140. https://doi.org/10.3102/ 00346543067001088
Hogan, K. (2002). Small Groups â€TM Ecological Reasoning While Making an Environmental
Management Decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341–368.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10025
Hogan, M. J., Dwyer, C. P., Harney, O. M., Noone, C., & Conway, R. J. (2015).
Metacognitive Skill Development and Applied Systems Science?: A Framework of Metacognitive Skills ,
Self-regulatory Functions and Real-World Applications (pp. 75–106). © Springer
International Publishing Switzerland 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2
Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How Should The Internal Structure of Personality
Inventories be Evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(3), 332–346.
Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2003). An Introduction to Statistics in Psychology: A
Complete Guide for Students (Second edi). Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
Hussey., J., & Hussey., R. (1997). Business Research: A Practical Guide for
Undergraduate and Postgradute Students. London:Macmillan Press.
IEA. (2012). TIMSS 2011 INTERNATIONAL RESULTS IN SCIENCE. New directions
ment (Vol. 2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20038
Ikhwan, M. S. M., Sadiah, B., & Eshah, M. S. (2017). Scientific reasoning skills based
on socio-scientific issues in the biology subject. International Journal of Advanced
and Applied Sciences, 4(3), 13–18.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.03.003
Itin, C. M. (1999). Reasserting the philosophy of experiential education as a vehicle for change
... The Journal of Experiental Education, Fall 1999(22,2), 91.
James, M. C., Willoughby, S., James, M. C., & Willoughby, S. (2013). Listening to student
conversations during clicker questions?: What you have not heard might surprise you?! Listening to
student conversations during clicker questions?: What you have not heard might surprise
you?!, 123(2011). https://doi.org/10.1119/ 1.3488097
Kalarova, T., Hadjiali, I., Denev, I. (2013). High School Students â€TM Reasoning in Making
Decisions about Socio-Ethical Issues of Genetic Engineering?: Case of Gene Therapy EDUCATION &
BASIC SCIENCE. Education & Basic Science, (October 2014), 37–41.
https://doi.org/10.5504/BBEQ.2012.0133
Kampa, N., Neumann, I., Heitmann, P., & Kremer, K. (2016). Epistemological beliefs in science —
a person-centered approach to investigate high school students ‘ profiles. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 46, 81–93. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.04.007
Kamtekar, R. (2012). Situationism and Virtue Ethics on the Content of Our Character
*. Chicago Journals, 114(3), 458–491. https://doi.org/10.1086/381696
Karoline, E., & Justin, H. (2012). Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and
Technology Education. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7793-4
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Ringkasan Eksekutif Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan
Malaysia 2013-2025 (Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga Lepas Menengah). Retrieved
from http://www.moe.gov.my/cms/upload_files/ articlefile/2013/articlefile_file_003113.pdf
Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, B. (2009). Effect of the Number of Variables on Measures of
Fit in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Model: A Multidisciplinary Journal,
10(3)(February 2015), 333–351. https://doi.org/ 10.1207/S15328007SEM1003
Kent, R. (2001). Data Contruction and Data Analysis for Survey research. Palgrave, New York.
Kerl nger, F. N. (2004). Foundation of The Behavioral Research (2nd editio). Sarjeet ication.
Delhi.
King, Patricia M.; Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment:
Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in
adolescents and adults. ossey-Bass, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco.
King, P. M. (1981). Reflective Judgment?: Concepts of Justification and Their
Relationship to Age and Education, 16.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The
Guilford Press New York London.
Klosterman, M. L., Sadler, T. D., & Brown, J. (2011). Science Teachers‘ Use of Mass Media to
Address Socio-Scientific and Sustainability Issues. Research in Science Education, 42, 51–74.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9256-z
Klosterman, M. L., Sadler, T. D., & Brown, J. (2012). Science Teachers‘ Use of Mass Media to
Address Socio-Scientific and Sustainability Issues. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 51–74.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9256-z
Klosterman, M. L., Sadler, T. D., & Brown, J. (2012). Science Teachers‘ Use of Mass Media to
Address Socio-Scientific and Sustainability Issues. Research in Science Education, 42, 51–74.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9256-z
KPM. (2002). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Biologi Tingkatan 4.
KPM. (2012). Dasar Pendidikan Kebangsaan. Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia.
Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/BUKU DASAR.pdf
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The Development of Argument Skills, 74(5), 1245– 1260.
Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. (2012). Laporan Awal Pelan
Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Lederman, N. G., Abd-el-khalick, F., Bell, R. L., Hall, R., & Street, E. (2002). Views of Nature of
Science Questionnaire?: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners ‘ Conceptions of Nature
of Science, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/tea.10034
Lee, H., & Witz, K. G. (2009). Science Teachers‘ Inspiration for Teaching
Socio? scientific Issues: Disconnection with reform efforts. International Journal of
Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801898903
Lee, Y. C. (2012). Socio-Scientific Issues in Health Contexts: Treading a rugged
terrain. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/
09500693.2011.613417
Leighton, J. P. (2006). Teaching and Assessing Deductive Reasoning Skills. The Journal
of Experimental Education, 74(2), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.3200/
JEXE.74.2.107-136
Leighton, J. P., Gokiert, R. J., & Cui, Y. (2007). Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Methods to
Identify the Cognitive Dimensions In a Large-Scale Science Assessment.
International Journal of Testing, 7(2), 141–189. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15305050701193520
Levinson, R., & Levinson, R. (2007). Towards a Theoretical Framework for Teaching Controversial
Socio scientific Issues Towards a Theoretical Framework for Teaching Controversial
Socio-scientific, (September 2013), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753
Levison, R. (2006). Towards a Theoretical Framework for Teaching Controversial
Socio-scientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1201– 1224.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753
Lewis, A., Smith, D., & Lewis, A. (2009). Defining higher order thinking, (March 2015),
37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543588
Lewis, J., & Leach, J. (2006). Discussion of Socio? scientific Issues: The role of
science knowledge. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/
10.1080/09500690500439348
Liou, P., & Hung, Y. (2014). Statistical techniques utilized in analyzing pisa and
timss data in science education from 1996 to 2013: a methodological review, (May).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9558-5
Lodewyk, K. (2007). Educational Psychology?: An International Journal of
Experimental Relations among Epistemological Beliefs , Academic Achievement
, and Task Performance in Secondary School Students. Educational Psychology, 27(November 2014),
37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601104080
Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural
Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Lori D. Patton, Kristen A. Renn, Florence M. Guido, S. J. Q. (2016). Student
Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350
Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94104; Tel: 415-433-1767,.
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantificatiom of Content Validity. Nursing Research, 35(6),
382–385.
Macer, D. R. J. (2006). A Cross-Cultural Introduction to Bioethics. No Title.
Christchurch, N.Z.: Eubios Ethics Institute.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2007). TIMSS 2007 International Science Report.
Science.
Mastaglia, B., Toye, C., & Krisjanson, L. J. (2003). Ensuring content validity in
instrument development: Challenges and innovative approaches. Contemporary
se, 14(3).
Mastaglia, B., Toye, C., & Kristjanson, L. J. (2003). Ensuring content validity in
instrument development: Challenges and innovative approaches. Contemporary Nurse, 14(June 2015),
281–291. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.14.3.281
Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational
types inferens in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 1031–1056.
Mchugh, M. L. (2012). Lessons in biostatistics Interrater reliability?: the kappa
statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.
Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: ways
of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research
Journal, 30(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/014119204
10001689689
Moss, K., & Crowley, M. (2011). Computers & Education Effective learning in science?:
The use of personal response systems with a wide range of audiences. Computers &
Education, 56(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2010.03.021
Mueller, M. P., & Zeidler, D. L. (2010). Moral – Ethical Character and Science
Education?: EcoJustice Ethics Through Socioscientific Issues ( SSI ). In D.J Tippins et.
al. (Ed.), Cultural Studies & Environmentalism (Vol. 3, pp. 105–128).
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90- 481-3929-3
Nazirmuddin Ahmad, Mohd Taib Arifin, Marinah Awang. (2005). Pengantar Etika.
Pustaka Salam Sdn. Bhd.
Neber, H., & Schommer-Ai,.H. (2010). Self-regulated Science Learning with Highly Gifted Students?:
The role of cognitive , Self-regulated Science Learning with Highly Gifted Students?: the
role of cognitive , motivational , epistemological ,. High Ability Studies, (March
2013), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13598130220132316
Noar, S. M. (2009). Structural Equation Modeling?: A The Role of Structural Equation Modeling in
Scale Development. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,
10(4)(February 2014), 622–647. https://doi.org
/10.1207/S15328007SEM1004
Nordin, A., & Lin, H. (2011). Hubungan sikap terhadap mata pelajaran sains dengan penguasaan
konsep asas sains pelajar tingkatan dua. Journal of Science & Mathematics Education,
(June), 89–101. Retrieved from http://eprints. utm.my/13431/
Nuangchale, P. (2009). Development of Socioscientific Issues-Based Teaching for Preservice
Science Teachers. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 239–243.
https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.239.243
Global Warming
through Socioscientific
Issues-based Instruction, 6(8), 42–47.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd editio). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Oecd. (2011). Education at a Glance 2011. OECD indicators. Education. https://
doi.org/10.1787/eag-2011-en
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (n.d.). International Journal of Science Attitudes towards
science?: A review of the literature and its implications, (January 2013), 37–41.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual - a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for
windows (version 10). Buckingham Open University Press.
Park, M., Kjervik, D., Crandell, J., & Oermann, M. H. (2012). The relationship of
ethics education to moral sensitivity and moral reasoning skills of nursing students.
Nursing Ethics, 19(4), 568–580. https://doi.org/10.1177
/0969733011433922
Pegg, J. M. (2006). Developing explanations: student reasoning about science
concepts during claims-evidence inquiry lessons. Interpreting. Retrieved from
http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/handle/1957/3190
Perry, William G., J. (1979). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the
college years: A scheme. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St., San Francisco,
CA 94104; Tel: 415-433-1767,.
Piaget, J. (1976). Piaget â€TM s Theory. Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1976.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46323-5_2
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods (7th
edit). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.
Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision?making about socio?scientific issues within the
science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167–182.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190203
Reips‘, U.-D., & Frederick, F. (2008). Interval-level measurement with visual
analogue scales in Internet-based research?: V AS Generator, 40(3), 699–704.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.699
Reis, P. (2009). Teaching Controversial Socio-Scientific Issues in Biology and Geology
Classes?: A Case Study. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13, 1–24.
Reiss, M. J. (2006). Teacher Education and the New Biology Teacher Education and the New Biology.
Teaching Education, (April 2013), 37–41. https://doi.org/
/10476210600680325
Remenyi, D., Williams‘, B., Money, A., & Swartz, E. (1998). Doing Reserch in Business
and Management: An Introduction to process and method. Sage Publication.
Repman, J., Zinskie, C., & Carlson, R. D. (2016). Effective Use of CMC Tools in
Interactive Online Learning (Vol. 569). https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v22n01
Reuker, S. (2016). The knowledge-based reasoning of physical education teachers?: A comparison
between groups with different expertise. European Physical Educational Review, 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15624245
Rindermann, H., & Baumeister, A. E. E. (2014). Validating the Interpretations of PISA
and TIMSS Tasks: A Rating Study. International Journal of Testing, 15(1), 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.966911
Robottom, I. (2012). Socio-Scientific Issues in Education: Innovative Practices and
Contending Epistemologies. Research in Science Education, 42, 95–107.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9258-x
Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Educational Technology Research
Past and Present?: Balancing Rigor and Relevance to Impact School Learning. Contemporary
Educational Technology, 1(1), 17–35.
Roth, W., & Is, C. V. A. (1993). The Development of Science Process Skills in
Authentic Contexts, 30(2), 127–152.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio- scientific
issues. Journal of Moral Education, 33(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/
10.1080/0305724042000733091
Sadler, T. D. (2009a). Situated learning in science education: socio?scientific issues as
contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education (Vol. 45).
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
Sadler, T. D. (2009b). Situated learning in science education: socio?scientific issues as contexts
for practice. Studies in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
Sadler, T. D. (2011). A Socio-Scientific Issues in The Classroom?: Teaching, Learning and Learning.
(Troy D. Sadler, Ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/978- 94-007-1159-4_16.
Sadler, T. D. (2011). Turkish Preservice Science Teachers ‘ Informal Reasoning Regarding
Socioscientific Issues and the Factors Influencing Their Informal Reasoning, 313–332.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9221-0
Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature
of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science
Education, 26(4), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/
69032000119456
Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. a. (2006). Socioscientific Argumentation: The effects of content
knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463–1488.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The Morality of Socioscientific Issues:
Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4–27.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005a). The significance of content knowledge for
informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge
to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71–93.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005b). The significance of content knowledge for informal
reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic
engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse:
Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 46(8), 909–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327
Salomon, G., & Almog, T. (1998). Educational Psychology and Technology?: A Matter of
Reciprocal Relations. Educational Psychology and Technology, 100(1), 222–241.
Sampson, V., Simon, S., Amos, R., & Evagorou, M. (2011). Metalogue: Engaging Students in
Scientific and Socio-scientific Argumentation BT - Socio-scientific Issues in The classroom.
(pp. 193–200). https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-94-007- 1159-4
Santos, D. (2008). Scientific Literacy?: A Freirean Perspective as a Radical View.
Wiley InterScience, (2006), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20301
Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2011). A Pedagogical Model for Ethical Inquiry into
Socioscientific Issues In Science. On Line Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z
Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research Methods for Business
Students. (6 edition). London: FT Prentice Hall.
Schmidt, C. D., Mcadams, C. R., & Foster, V. (2009). Promoting the moral reasoning of undergraduate
business students through a deliberate psychological education
? based classroom intervention. Journal of Moral Education, 38(December 2014), 37–41.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240903101556
Schommer-aikins, M., & Easter, M. (2006). Ways of Knowing and Epistemological Beliefs?: Combined
effect on academic performance. Educational Psychology,
. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500341304
Schumacker, & Lomax. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling.
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Sekaran, U. (2010). Research Methods For Business A Skill Building Approach. Journal of
Education for Business Book Review, (March 2015), 1–3.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1993.10117635
Sewall Wright. (1934). The Method of Path Coefficients. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics,
5(3), 161–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470011815.b2a13089
Sharma, S. (1996). Applied multivariate techniques. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Shuell, T. J.
(1986). Cognitive Conceptions of Learning. Review of Educational
Research, 56(4), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056004411
Siegel, M. A., & Ranney, M. A. (2003). Developing the Changes in Attitude about the Relevance of
Science ( CARS ) Questionnaire and Assessing Two High School Science Classes, 40(8), 757–775.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10110
Siegler, R. S. (2016). Continuity and Change in the Field of Cognitive Development and in the
Perspectives of One Cognitive Developmentalist. Child Development Perspectives, 0(0), 1–6.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12173
Siew Fong Yap. (2014). Beliefs, values, ethics and moral reasoning in socio-scientific education.
Issues in Educational Research, 24(3), 2014, 24(24(3)), 21. Retrieved from
http://www.iier.org.au/iier24/yap.pdf
Simonneaux, L. (2008). Argumentation in socio-scientific contexts. Argumentation in Science
Education, 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2
Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2009). Students‘ socio-scientific reasoning on
controversies from the viewpoint of education for sustainable development. Cultural
Studies of Science Education, 4, 657–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11422-008-9141-x
Smith, C. L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. G. (2010). Sixth-Grade Students
â€TM Epistemologies of Science?: The Impact of School Science Experiences on
Epistemological Development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3)(May 2013), 349–422.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1803_3
Snyder, T. E., & Gamas, W. S. (2014). Promoting in conceptual change A
comparative meta-analysis science?: from interventions of instructional education reading education
and science, 28(2), 116–159.
Sobel, M. E. (1987). from the SAGE Social Science Collections . Rights Reserved . from All.
Sociological Method & Research, volume 16(no.1). https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0049124187016001006
Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An Introduction. Newbury Park?: Sage
Publication.
Stan ey A. Mulaik. (2009). Linear Causal Modeling with Strctural Equations. CRC
Press.
Subiantoro, A. W. (2011). Socioscientific Issues and its Potency on Biology
Instruction for Character Education in Indonesia, (November), 1–6.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2011). Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd editio).
New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Tal, R., & Hochberg, N. (2003). Assessing High Order Thinking of Students Participating
in The ?Wise? Project in Israel. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29, 69–89.
https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(03)00016-6
Tal, T., Kali, Y., Magid, S., & Madhok, J. J. (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the
Classroom. Socio-Scientific Issies in the Classroom: Teaching, Learning and Results,
39(October), 11–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4
Tal, T., & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: classroom culture and students‘
performances. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), 615–644.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9026-9
Tarhini, R. M. B. Y. O. A. (2016). "A Jordanian empirical study of the associations among
transformational leadership, transactional leadership, knowledge sharing, job performance, and
firm performance: a structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Management
Development, 35(5).
Thiroux, J. P. (2001). Ethics, Theory & Practice (7 edition). New Jersey, Prentice Hall
Inc.
Thompson, M., Bayi, E., & Boro, K. (2015). Teachers‘ Practices in Kindergarden
Classrooms:Cognitive Constructivist Theory of Learning. International Open Acces Journal,
1–3.
TIMSS Implications for U.S. Education. (n.d.). Retrieved
from http://christienken.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Tienken_AASA_Winter_ 13_TIMSS.pdf
Trompenears, F., & Hamden-Turner, C. (1997). Riding The Wave of Culture:
Understanding Culteral Diversity in Business (2nd editio). London?: Nicholas Brealey.
Tsai, C. (2010). Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions
of constructivist learning environments. Educational Research, (February 2015), 37–41.
https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800363836
Tsai, M., & Tsai, C. (2010). Innovations in Education and Teaching International
Information searching strategies in web-based science learning?: the role of internet
self-efficacy Information Searching Strategies in Web-Based Science Learning?: The Role
of Internet Self-Efficacy, (October 2014), 37–41.
rg/10.1080/1355800032000038822
Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2003). Tracing young children‘s scientific reasoning.
Research in Science Education, 33, 433–465. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.
0000005250.04426.67
U. Narmadha, & Dr. S. Chamundeswari. (2013). Attitude towards Learning of Science and
Academic Achievement in Science among Students at the Secondary Level. Journal of
Sociological Research , 4(2), 114–124. https:// doi.org/10.5296/jsr.v4i2.3909
Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10
students‘ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 952–977. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20358
Vernon, D. T. A., & Blake, R. L. (1993). Does Problem Based Learning Work? A
Meta-Analysis of Evaluative Research. Journal of The Association of America Medical
Colleges, 68(7), 550–563.
Voss, J. F., Perkins, D. N., & Segal, J. w. (2009). Informal Reasoning and Education.
Routledge New York London.
Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability
and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84–136.
https://doi.org/10.2307/270754
Wicks, A. C., & Freeman, R. E. (1998). Organization Studies and the New
Pragmatism?: Positivism , Anti-positivism , and the Search for Ethics.
Orhanization Science, 9(2), 123–140.
Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). The Effects of Different On-line Searching Activities on High
School Students‘ Cognitive Structures and Informal Reasoning Regarding a
Socio-scientific Issue. Research in Science Education, 41, 771–785.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9189-y
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd editio). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Publication.
Yuan, K.-H., Marshall, L. L., & Bentler, P. M. (2002). A unified approach to
exploratory factor analysis with missing data, nonnormal data, and in the presence of
outliers. Psychometrika, 67(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02294711
Yusri, I. M. (2010). Bimbingan Cepat: Analisis Data Penyelidikan Untuk Pendidikan & Sains Sosial.
Bandar Ilmu, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.
Yusuf al-Qaradawi. (1994). The Lawful& The Prohibited in Islam?: Al-Halal Wal- Haram Fil
Islam. American Trust Publication.
Zabani Darus. (2012). Status Pencapaian Malaysia dalam TIMSS dan PISA?: Satu
Refleksi. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Zainudin, A. (2014). A Hand Book on Structural Equation Modeling. MPWS Rich
Resources, Selangor Malaysia.
Zainudin, A. (2015). Research Methology & Data Analysis. UiTM Press.
Zanaton, Lilia, & Kamisah. (2006). Sikap Terhadap Sains dalam Kalangan Pelajar Sains
eli Peringkat Menengah dan Matrikulasi. Pertanika Journal Social Science, 14(2).
Zeidler, D. L. (2003). The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and
Discourse in Science Education. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/
book/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X
Zeidler, D. L., Florida, S., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific Issues?: Theory
and Practice, 21(2), 49–58.
Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., Ruzek, M., Linder, A., & Lin, S.-S. (2013). Cross-
cultural epistemological orientations to socioscientific issues. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 50(3), 251–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21077
Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The Role of Moral Reasoning and the Status of Socioscientific
Issues in Science Education. The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and
Discourse in Science Education, 7–38 TS–CrossRef. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X_2 M4 -
Citavi
Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2007). The Role of Moral Reasoning in
Argumentation?: Conscience , Character , and Care. In Argumentation in science education (pp.
201–216). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_10
Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Social and Ethical Issues in Science
Education?: A Prelude to Action 1 C. Science and Education, 799–803.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9130-6
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective
judgment through Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1),
74–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005a). Beyond STS: A
research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education,
89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005b). Beyond STS: A
research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education,
89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
Zeidler, M. D., Ph, D., Howes, E., Ph, D., Ferron, J., Ph, D., … Ph, D. (2009). College Students ?
Use of Science Content During Socioscientific Issues Negotiation?: Impact of Evolution
Understanding and Acceptance by Samantha R . Fowler A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of P.
Zikmund, W. G. (1994). Business Research Methods (4th ed.). Fort Worth: Dryden.
Zimmerman, C. (2000). The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills.
Developmental Review, 20, 99–149. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0497
Zimmerman, C. (2005). The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills: What Psychologists
Contribute to an Understanding of Elementary Science Learning. Final Report to the
National Research Concil. https://doi.org/ 10.1006/drev.1999.0497
Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle
school. Developmental Review, 27, 172–223. https://doi.org
/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering Students â€TM Knowledge and
Argumentation Skills Through Dilemmas in Human Genetics. Journal of
Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008