Abdelmalak, M. M. M. (2015). Web 2.0 technologies and building online learning communities:
Students’ perspectives. Online Learning, 19(2), 87–106. Diambil dari
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1062942.pdf
Abdulahi, A. A., NorHidayati, Z., & Elmi, A. H. (2012). An evaluation of virtual learning
environment readiness in higher education institutions (HEIs). Journal of Information
Systems Research and Innovation, 2, 86–94. Diambil dari http://seminar.
utmspace.edu.my/jisri/
Abdul Wahab, L. (2012). A modification of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of
Technology (UTAUT) from users’ perspectives of Telecentre in Nigeria. (Tesis Kedoktoran,
Universiti Utara Malaysia). Diambil dari http://etd.uum.edu.my/3379/
Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An
investigation in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance
Learning, 14(5), 82–107. Diambil dari http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/
viewFile/1631/2749
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Dalam Orgnizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes 50 (hal. 179–211). Academic Press, Inc. http://doi.org/10.1016/0749-
5978(91)90020-T
Al-Najjar, G. M. (2012). Mobile information systems: An empirical analysis of the determinants
of mobile commerce acceptance in Jordan. (Tesis Kedoktoran). Universiti Utara Malaysia,
Kedah, Malaysia.
Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three
different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440–
454. Diambil dari http://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/693/1061
Alavifar, A., Karimimalayer, M., & Mohd Khairol, A. (2012). Structural equation modeling VS
multiple regression. Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal
(ESTIJ), 2(2), 326–329. Diambil dari http://www.estij.org/papers/vol2no22012/
5vol2no2.pdf
Alghanmi, S. (2014). Investigating the interpersonal and contextual factors govern Saudi
lecturers’ motivation in creating innovative blended learning environment that web 2.0-
based. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3), 96–106. Diambil dari
http://www.tojet.net/articles/v13i3/13311.pdf
Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding
academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International
Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143–155. Diambil dari
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.428.9465&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Ali, M. F., Joyes, G., & Ellison, L. (2013). Using blended learning to enhance students’ cognitive
presence. Proceedings - 2013 International Conference on Informatics and Creative
Multimedia, ICICM 2013, 202–208. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICICM.2013.42
Almasaeid, T. F. (2014). The effect of using blended learning strategy on achievement and 9th
grade students. European Scientific Journal, 10(31), 133–145. Diambil dari
http://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/viewFile/4573/4370
Alotaibi, K. N. R. (2013). The effect of blended learning on developing critical thinking skills.
Education Journal, 2(4), 176–185. http://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20130204.21
Alshibly, H. (2014). An empirical investigation into factors influencing the intention to use elearning
system: An extended technology acceptance model. British Journal of Applied
Science & Technology, 4(17), 2440–2457. Diambil dari
http://www.journalrepository.org/media/journals/BJAST_5/2014/Apr/Alshibly4172014BJA
ST10033_1.pdf
Althunibat, A. (2015). Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning
in Jordan higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 65–71.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.046
Ana Haziqah, A. R. (2014). Teacher’s perception towards virtual learning environment. (Tesis
Sarjana). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.
Aravamudhan, N. R., & Krishnaveni, R. (2015). Establishing and reporting content validity
evidence of new Training and Development Capacity Building Scale (TDCBS).
Management: Journal of Contemporary Management, 20(1), 131–158. Diambil dari
http://hrcak.srce.hr/141598?lang=en
Attuquayefio, S. N., & Addo, H. (2014). Using the UTAUT model to analyze students ’ ICT
adoption. Journal of Technology, 10(3), 75–86. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/
fulltext/EJ1059042.pdf
Azlah, M. J., & Fariza, K. (2014). Keberkesanan kemahiran komunikasi di kalangan guru dalam
penggunaan persekitaran pembelajaran maya (Frog VLE). Dalam K. Fariza, D. Md Yusoff,
& A. R. Mohd Jasmy (Ed.), Aliran Terkini Dalam Pengajaran Sumber Dan Teknologi
Maklumat:Impaknya ke atas Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan 2014 (hal. 63–69). Bangi:
Penerbit Fakulti Pendidikan, UKM.
Azlina, A. B., Fahmi Zaidi, A. R., & Wan Salihin, W. A. (2013). Assessing the effects of
UTAUT and self-determination predictor on students continuance intention to use student
portal. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(10), 1484–1489. http://doi.org/10.5829
/idosi.wasj.2013.21.10.2920
Bachman, C., & Scherer, R. (2015). Promoting student autonomy and competence using a hybrid
model for teaching physical activity. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1). Diambil dari
http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2015_1_1.pdf
Banas, J. R., & York, C. S. (2014). Authentic learning exercises as a means to influence
preservice teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy and intentions to integrate
technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 728–746.
http://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2014070105
Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. Social Learning Theory. New York: General
Learning Press.
Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. The American psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.
http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175
Banyen, W., Viriyavejakul, C., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2016). A Blended learning model for learning
achievement enhancement of Thai undergraduate students. International Journal of
Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4), 48–55. http://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i04.5325
Barker, J. (2015). Benefits of hybrid classes in community colleges. Contemporary Issues In
Education Research, 8(3), 143–146. Diambil dari http://cluteinstitute.com/ojs/index.php/
CIER/article/viewFile/9343/9393
Barker, J., & Gossman, P. (2013). The learning impact of a virtual learning environment:
Students’ views. Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal, 5(2), 19–38. Diambil
dari http://194.81.189.19/ojs/index.php/TEAN/article/viewFile/146/261
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social
psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Barrio-garcía, S., Arquero, J. L., & Romero-frías, E. (2015). Personal learning environments
acceptance model: The role of need for cognition , e-learning satisfaction and students ’
perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 129–141. Diambil dari
http://www.ifets.info/journals/18_3/10.pdf
Bath, D., & Bourke, J. (2010). Getting started with blended learning. Diambil dari
https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/267178/Getting_started_with_blend
ed_learning_guide.pdf
Belapurkar, A. M. (2013). Blended learning for effective remote learning. Scholarly Research
Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, (Special Issue), 1–9. Diambil dari http://srjis.com/wpcontent/
uploads/2016/01/3.2-ANITA-BELAPURKAR.pdf
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices (2nd Ed.).
USF Tampa Bay Open Access Textbooks Collection: Creative Commons Attribution.
Bottge, B. A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M. D., Butler, M., & Cho, S.-J. (2014). Effects of
blended instructional models on math performance. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 423–437.
http://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527240
Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and
implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a
cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006
Briggs, K. C. (2014). Blended learning vs face-to-face instruction: A quantitative evaluation of
student achievement in Algebra I. (Tesis Kedoktoran, Northcentral University). Diambil dari
https://library.ncu.edu/diss/GetAbstract/4487
Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. Dalam R. H. Hoyle (Ed.),
HandBook of Structural Equation Modeling (hal. 361–376). New York: The Guilford Press.
Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information
and communication technology into teaching: a review of the literature. International
Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology,
8(1), 136–155. Diambil dari http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//viewarticle.php?id=1361
Carman, J. M. (2005). Blended learning design: 5 key ingredients. Instructional Design. Diambil
dari http://www.agilantlearning.com/instructionaldesign.html
Cassum, S. H., Allana, S., & Dias, J. (2016). Blended Learning across Disciplines: Models for
Implementation. Journal of Education and Training Studies (Vol. 4). http://doi.org/
10.11114/jets.v4i1.1168
Çevik, Y. D., Da?han, G., Barin, S., & Savran, R. (2015). Examining information and
communication technologies preservice teachers ’ views on technology integration and their
roles in this process. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 11(4), 1143–1166.
Diambil dari http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezpustaka.upsi.edu.my/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?
sid=032be052-c7c6-4214-9b27-9054d72c511b@sessionmgr4004&vid=13&hid=4204
Chan, W. T. Y., & Leung, C. H. (2016). The use of social media for blended learning in tertiary
education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 771–778. http://doi.org/
10.13189/ujer.2016.040414
Chang, C. C., Shu, K. M., Liang, C., Tseng, J. S., & Hsu, Y. S. (2014). Is blended e-learning as
measured by an achievement test and self-assessment better than traditional classroom
learning for vocational high school students? International Review of Research in Open and
Distance Learning, 15(2), 213–231. Diambil dari http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/
article/view/1708/2890
Cheok, M. L., & Wong, S. L. (2016). Frog virtual learning environment for Malaysian schools:
Exploring teachers’ experience. Dalam J. Zhang, J. Yang, M. Chang, & T. Chang (Ed.), ICT
in Education in Global Context, Lecture Notes in Educational Technology (hal. 201–209).
Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-
43927-2
Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology
applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in k-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis.
Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001
Chew, E. (2008). Book review: Blended learning tools for teaching and training. Educational
Technology & Society, 11(2), 344–347. Diambil dari http://www.jstor.org/stable/
jeductechsoci.11.2.344
Chew, E., A.Turner, D., & Jones, N. (2010). In love and war: Blended learning theories for
computer scientists and educationists. Dalam F. L. Wang, J. Fong, & R. C. Kwan (Ed.),
Handbook of Research on Hybrid Learning Models: Advanced Tools, Technologies, and
Applications (hal. 1–23). Hershey: Information Science Reference.
Chibás-Ortíz, F., Borroto-Carmona, G., & De-Almeida-Santos, F. (2014). Managing creativity in
collaborative virtual learning environments: A DL corporate project. Media Education
Reseacrh Journal, 22, 143–151. http://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-14
Chiemeke, S., & Evwiekpaefe, A. (2011). A conceptual framework of a modified unified theory
of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model with Nigerian factors in e-commerce
adoption. Educational Research, 2(December), 1719–1726. Diambil dari
http://interesjournal.org/ER/pdf/2011/December/Chiemeke and Evwiekpaefe.pdf
Chien, T. C. (2012). Computer self-efficacy and factors influencing e-learning effectiveness.
European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 670–686.
http://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255539
Chua, Y. P. (2014a). Kaedah penyelidikan (3rd ed.). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.
Chua, Y. P. (2014b). Ujian regresi, analisis faktor dan analisis SEM (2nd ed.). Kuala Lumpur:
McGraw-Hill.
Cimermanová, I. (2013). Teacher training in the virtual learning environment. International
Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(10), 1–8.
Cohen, L., Lawrence, M., & Keith, M. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New
York: Routledge.
Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for
computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118–143. Diambil dari
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.118
Cooke, V. (2014). An evaluation of the use of blended learning strategies to develop and enhance
students’ knowledge of primary science. Worcester Journal of Learning and Teaching, (9).
Diambil dari http://www.worc.ac.uk/edu/documents/Blended_Learning_Strategies_for_
Primary_Science_Cooke.pdf
Co?kunçay, D. F., & Özkan, S. (2013). A model for instructors’ adoption of learning management
systems: Empirical validation in higher education context. The Turkish Online Journal of
Educational Technology, 12(2), 13–25. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov
/fulltext/EJ1015409.pdf
Crawford, C., Barker, J., & Seyam, A. (2014). The promising role of hybrid learning in
community colleges: Looking towards the future. Contemporary Issues In Education
Research, 7(3), 237–243. http://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.19030/cier.v7i3.8645
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative
and qualitative research (4th. ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of
information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. http://doi.org/doi.org/10.2307
/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology:
A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8). http://doi.org/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use
computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.
http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal
of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
De?man, M. (2015). Modeling the acceptance of e-learning in mandatory environments of higher
education: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in Human Behavior,
49, 272–281. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.022
Demirer, V., & Sahin, I. (2013). Effect of blended learning environment on transfer of learning:
An experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 518–529.
http://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12009
Dillon, W. R., Kumar, A., & Mulani, N. (1987). Offending estimates in covariance structure
analysis: Comments on the causes of and solutions to Heywood cases. Psychological
Bulletin, 101(1), 126–135. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.126
Downing, C. E., Spears, J., & Holtz, M. (2014). Transforming a course to blended learning for
student engagement. Education Research International, 2014, 10. http://doi.org/
10.1155/2014/430732
Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1(4), 1–4. Diambil
dari http://www-07.ibm.com/services/pdf/blended_learning.pdf
Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of research
trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. Internet and Higher Education,
17, 90–100. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003
Eryilmaz, M. (2015). The effectiveness of blended learning environments. Contemporary Issues
In Education Research, 8(4), 251–256. http://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v8i4.9433
Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the technology acceptance model
(TAM) to examine faculty use of learning management systems (LMSs) in higher education
institutions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 210–232. Diambil
dari http://www.researchgate.net/publication/281842180
Feinberg, F. M. (2012). Mediation analysis and categorical variables: Some further frontiers.
Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 595–598. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.03.007
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th Ed.). London: SAGE
Publications Ltd.
Fielding, N. G. (2012). Triangulation and mixed methods designs: Data integration with new
research technologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 24(3), 226–238.
http://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437101
Finstad, K. (2010). Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales.
Journal of Usability Studies, 5(3), 104–110. Diambil dari http://uxpajournal.org/wpcontent/
uploads/pdf/JUS_Finstad_May_2010.pdf
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to
theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological
Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. Diambil dari papers://e7d065ae-9998-4287-8af0-
c9fa85af8e96/Paper/p44071
Foong Mae, C. (2002). ICT in Malaysian schools: Policy and strategies. Education Technology
Division, Ministry of Education, Malaysia. Diambil dari http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc
/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan011288.pdf
Francis, R., & Shannon, S. J. (2013). Engaging with blended learning to improve students’
learning outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 359–369.
http://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2013.766679
FrogAsia. (2014). Frog Asia; What is the Frog VLE? Diambil dari http://whatisthe.
blogspot.ca/2010/04/what-is-accuracy-of-dgps.html
Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods
variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing statistical assumptions. Asheboro, NC USA: Statistical Associates
Publishing.
Garson, G. D. (2015). Structural equation modeling. Asheboro, NC USA: Statistical Associates
Publishing.
Gaskin, J. (2011). Common method bias. Diambil 20 Januari 2017, dari http://youtube.com/
Gaskination
Gaskin, J. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Diambil dari http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/
Gaskin, J. (2015). Mediation concepts and bootstrapping in AMOS. Diambil dari
http://youtube.com/Gaskination
Gaskin, J. (2016a). 2 way interactions. Stats Tools Package. Diambil dari http://statwiki.
kolobkreations.com
Gaskin, J. (2016b). Confirmatory factor analysis. Diambil 3 Januari 2017, dari http://statwiki.
kolobkreations.com
Gaskin, J. (2016c). Data screening. Diambil 3 Januari 2017, dari http://statwiki.
kolobkreations.com/
Gaskin, J. (2016d). Mediation. Diambil dari http://youtube.com/Gaskination
Gaskin, J. (2016e). Multi-group analysis. Diambil dari http://youtube.com/Gaskination
Gaskin, J. (2016f). MyIndirectEffects.AmosEstimandVB. Gaskination’s Statistics. Diambil dari
http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com
Gaskin, J. (2016g). Structural equation modeling. Diambil 25 Januari 2017, dari http://statwiki.
kolobkreations.com
Gaskin, J. (2016h). Validity and reliability. Diambil 21 Januari 2017, dari http://statwiki.
kolobkreations.com
Gaskin, J. (2016i). Validity master. Stats Tools Package. Diambil dari http://statwiki.
kolobkreations.com
Geçer, A., & Da?, F. (2012). A blended learning experience. Educational Sciences: Theory &
Practice, 12(1), 438–443. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ978452.pdf
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1987). Improper solutions in the analysis of covariance
structures: Their interpretability and a comparison of alternate respecifications.
Psychometrika, 52(1), 99–111. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293958
Gibbs, C. (2003). Explaining effective teaching: Self-efficacy and thought control of action.
Journal of Educational Enquiry, 4(2), 1–14. Diambil dari http://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/
EDEQ/article/download/520/390
Gö?ü?, A., Nistor, N., & Lerche, T. (2012). Educational technology acceptance across cultures: a
validation of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in the context of turkish
national culture. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 394–408.
Diambil dari http://www.tojet.net/articles/v11i4/11440.pdf
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions.
Dalam C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Ed.), The Handbook of blended learning: Global
Perspectives, local designs. (hal. A1–A88). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
http://doi.org/10.2307/4022859
Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. Dalam M. G. Moore
(Ed.), Handbook Of Distance Education (3rd. ed., hal. 333–350). New York: Routledge.
Diambil dari https://www.academia.edu/2068375/Emerging_practice_and_research_
in_blended_learning
Graham, C. R., & Dziuban, C. (2008). Blended learning environments. Dalam J. David, M. J.
Spector, M. Driscoll, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Ed.), Handbook
of research on educational communications and technology (3, revised ed., hal. 269–276).
New York: Routledge. http://doi.org/10.1080/02652030701883203
Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for
blended learning research. Dalam A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Ed.),
Blended learning: Research Perspectives (Vol. 2, hal. 13–33). New York: Routledge.
Diambil dari https://www.academia.edu/3623333/Developing_models_and_theory_for_
blended_learning_research
Güler, B., & ?ah?n, M. (2015). The effect of blended learning method on preservice elementary
science teachers’ attitudes toward technology, self-regulation and science process skills.
Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 108–127. http://doi.org/
10.17522/nefefmed.17511
Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: An in depth
analysis of literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4596–4603.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis.
Pearson Education Limited (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least
squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Hair Jr., J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM :
updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal Multivariate Data
Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
Hall, S., & Villareal, D. (2015). The hybrid advantage: Graduate student perspectives of hybrid
education courses. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,
27(1), 69–80. Diambil dari http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
Hamzah, M. I., Embi, M. A., & Ismail, A. (2010). ICT and diversity in learners’ attitude on smart
school initiative. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 728–737.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.099
Hauser, R., Paul, R., & Bradley, J. (2012). Computer self-efficacy, anxiety, and learning in online
versus face to face medium. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11,
141–154. Diambil dari http://jite.informingscience.org/documents/Vol11/JITEv11p141-
154Hauser0910.pdf
Hayes, A. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable moderation,
mediation, and conditional process modeling. White paper. Diambil dari
http://www.afhayes.com/ public/process2012.pdf
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis.
New York: The Guilford Press.
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical
independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3),
451–470. http://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028
Heckman, R., Østerlund, C. S., & Saltz, J. (2015). Blended learning at the boundary: Designing a
new internship. Online Learning, 19(3), 111–128. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov
/fulltext/EJ1067509.pdf
Henrie, C. R., Bodily, R., Manwaring, K. C., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Exploring intensive
longitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning. International Review of
Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 131–155. Diambil dari
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2015/3386
Herkersdorf, M. (2014). Virtual blended learning. Global English PEARSON. Diambil dari
http://now.eloqua.com/e/er?s=2111&lid=439&elq=%3Cspanclass=eloquaemail%3Erecipien
tid%3C/span%3E
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Using blended learning: Evidence-based practices. New
York: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-089-6
Hiong, S. N., & Umbit, A. F. (2015). A pilot study on factors affecting the use of frog virtual
learning environment. Jurnal Pendidikan IPG, 12, 1–17. Diambil dari
http://www.ipbl.edu.my/portal/penyelidikan/jurnalpapers/jurnal2015/Siaw NH_Agatha.pdf
Hisham, D., Mohd Sobri, D. @ A. W., & Hamzah, A. R. (2012). Action research on blended
learningtransformative potential in higher education- learners’ perspectives. Business and
Management Research, 1(2), 125–134. http://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v1n2p125
Hofmann, J. (2014). Solutions to the top 10 challenges of blended learning. Boston. Diambil dari
https://www.insynctraining.com/pages/SolutionstotheTop10ChallengesofBlendedLearning.p
df
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for
determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
Diambil dari http://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=buschmanart
Hoque, K. E., Ahmad Zabidi, A. R., & Fatema Zohora, M. (2012). ICT utilization among school
teachers and principals in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in
Progressive Education and Development, 1(4), 17–34. Diambil dari
https://umexpert.um.edu.my/file/publication/00005891_85801.pdf
Huang, R., Ma, D., & Zhang, H. (2008). Towards a design theory of blended learning curriculum.
Dalam J. Fong, R. Kwan, & F. L. Wang (Ed.), Hybrid Learning and Education (hal. 66–78).
Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85170-7
Hung, M. (2015). Teacher readiness for online learning: Scale development and teacher
perception. Computers & Education, 94, 120–133. http://doi.org/10.1016
/j.compedu.2015.11.012
Hur, W.-M., Kim, H., & Kim, W.-M. (2014). The moderating roles of gender and age in tablet
computer adoption. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 17(1), 33–39.
http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0435
Hussein, A. (2009). The use of triangulation in social sciences research: Can qualitative and
quantitative methods be combined? Journal of Comparative Social Work, 1, 1–12. Diambil
dari http://www.bnemid.byethost14.com/NURSING RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
5.pdf?i=1
Ibrahim, M., Ahmad Shidki, M. Y., Wan Salihin Wong, A., & Fahmi Zaidi, A. R. (2015). Factors
contributing pre-school trainees teachers adoption of virtual learning environment:
Malaysian evidence. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 73–79.
Diambil dari http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i2/14210.pdf
Isiguzel, B. (2014). The blended learning environment on the foreign language learning process:
A balance for motivation and achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-
TOJDE, 15(3(10)), 108–122.
Isman, A., Abanmy, F. A. A., Hussein, H. B., Al Sandany, M. A., Barakat, H., Saadany, A., &
Abdelrahman, M. (2012). Using blended learning in developing student teachers teaching
skills. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 336–345.
Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research methods and statistics a critical thinking approach. Cengage
Learning (5th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning. Diambil dari
https://books.google.com.my/books?id=rTZ-BAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=
gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false
Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: How teachers
balance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information Technology
Education, 13, 121–140. Diambil dari http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol13/JITEv13
ResearchP121-140Jeffrey0460.pdf
Jick, T. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Qualitative
Methodology, 24(4), 602–611. http://doi.org/10.2307/2392366
Jöreskog, K. G. (1999). How large can a standardized coefficient be? Diambil dari
http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/HowLargeCanaStandardizedCoefficientbe.pdf
Kabakçi Yurdakul, I., Ursava?, Ö. F., & Becit ??çitürk, G. (2014). An integrated approach for
preservice teachers’ acceptance and use of technology: UTAUT-PST scale. Eurasian
Journal of Educational Research, (55), 21–36. http://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.55.2
Kahn, J. (2014). Reporting Mediation and Moderation. Diambil dari http://my.ilstu.edu/~jhkahn
/medmod.html
Kazu, I. Y., & Demirkol, M. (2014). Effect of blended learning environment model on high
school students’ academic achievement. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational
Technology, 13(1), 78–87.
Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. (2014). Maklum balas ke atas laporan Ketua Audit Negara
siri 3. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Diambil dari https://www.audit.gov.my/images/pdf/LKAN2013
/Persekutuan/Siri3/LKAN2013 _ Persekutuan MaklumBalas Siri 3 MASTER.pdf
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 -
2025. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Diambil dari http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/
Preliminary-Blueprint-ExecSummary-BM.pdf
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Kajian antarabangsa pengajaran dan pembelajaran
2013. Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Khan, A., Fleva, E., & Qazi, T. (2015). Role of self-esteem and general self-efficacy in teachers’
efficacy in primary schools. Psychology, 6(January), 117–125. http://doi.org/
10.4236/psych.2015.61010
Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., Pascot, D., & Bytha, A. (2014). UTAUT model for blended learning:
The role of gender and age in the intention to use webinars. Interdisciplinary Journal of ELearning
and Learning Objects, 10, 33–52.
Khlaisang, J., & Mingsiritham, K. (2016). Engaging virtual learning environment system to
enhance communication and collaboration skills among ASEAN higher education learners.
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 103–113. http://doi.org/
10.3991/ijet.v11i04.5503
Kinzie, M. B., Delcourt, M. a B., & Powers, S. M. (1994). Computer technologies: Attitudes and
self efficacy across undergraduate disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 35(6), 745–
768. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED357064.pdf
Klimova, B. F. (2015). Teaching and learning enhanced by information and communication
technologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 898–902. http://doi.org/
10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.112
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice Of structural equation modeling (3rd. Ed.). New
York: The Guilford Press.
Kong, S. C., Chan, T.-W., Griffin, P., Hoppe, U., Huang, R., Kinshuk, … Yu, S. (2014). Elearning
in school education in the coming 10 years for developing 21st century skills:
Critical research issues and policy implications. Education Technology & Society, 17(1),
70–78. Diambil dari http://chan.lst.ncu.edu.tw/publications/2014-E-learning in school
education.pdf
Korkmaz, O., & Karakus, U. (2009). The impact of blended learning model on student attitudes
towards geography course and their critical thinking dispositions and levels. The Turkish
Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(4), 51–63. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov
/fulltext/EJ859497.pdf
Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities.
Educational And Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. http://doi.org/10.1177
/001316447003000308
Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. Handbook of Survey
Research. Diambil dari http://books.google.com/books?id=mMPDPXpTP-0C&pgis=1
Kulviwat, S., Bruner, G. C., & Neelankavil, J. P. (2014). Self-efficacy as an antecedentce of
cognition and affect in technology acceptance. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31(3), 190–
199. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Kumutha, R., & Hamidah, Y. (2014). Barriers teachers face in integrating ICT during english
lessons: A case study. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 11–
19.
Lai, E. R., & Viering, M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: Integrating research findings.
National Council on Measurement in Education, (April), 66. Diambil dari
http://researchnetwork.pearson.com/wp-content/uploads/Assessing_21st_Century_Skills_
NCME.pdf
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical
data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. http://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Lauri, M. A. (2011). Triangulation of data analysis techniques. Papers of Social Representations,
20, 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153842
Lee, L.-T., & Hung, J. C. (2015). Effects of blended e-learning: A case study in higher education
tax learning setting. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 5(1), 13.
http://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-015-0024-3
Leila, K., & Tunku Badariah, T. A. (2013). Perceived learning and satisfaction in a blended
teacher education program: An experience of Malaysian teacher trainees. Contemporary
Educational Technology, 4(3), 197–211. Diambil dari http://www.cedtech.net/
articles/43/434.pdf
Lihitkar, S. R. (2013). Designing a prototype virtual learning environment for library and
information science students. Library Hi Tech News, 30(4), 13–15.
http://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-04-2013-0019
Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2007). Online vs. Blended Learning: Differences in
instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning
Networks, 11, 27–42. http://doi.org/184.168.109.199
Lim, K., & Hwa, M. (2015). A case study of the experiences of instructors and students in a
Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) with different cultural backgrounds. Asia Pacific
Education Review, 16(4), 613–626. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9400-y
Lin, Q. (2009). Student views of hybrid learning: A one-year exploratory study. Journal of
Computing in Teacher Education, 25(2), 57–66.
Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2007). Preparing for blended e-learning. London: Routledge.
http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00870_8.x
Liu, W., & Yu, H. (2012). Effectiveness study of english learning in blended learning
environment. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 524–530.
http://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.3.524-530
Lo, M. C., Ramayah, T., & Mohamad, A. A. (2015). Does intention really lead to actual use of
technology? A study of an e-learning system among university students in Malaysia.
Croatian Journal of Education, 17(3), 835–863. http://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v17i3.1085
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing
ResearchResearch, 35(6), 382–385. http://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Machado, L. J., & Chung, C. (2015). Integrating technology: The principals’ role and effect.
International Education Studies, 8(5), 43–53. http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n5p43
Maitland, A. (2009). Should I label all scale points or just the end points for attitudinal questions?
Survey Practice, 2(4). Diambil dari http://www.surveypractice.org/index.php/
SurveyPractice/rt/printerFriendly/172/html
Maranguni?, N., & Grani?, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from
1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
Marcinkowski, B., & Wrycza, S. (2015). CASE tools’ acceptance in higher education -
assessment and enhanced UTAUT model. Dalam 2015 Proceedings of the Conference on
Information Systems Applied Research (hal. 1–9). Diambil dari
http://proc.conisar.org/2015/pdf/3671.pdf
Martin, J. S., Kreiger, J. E., & Apicerno, A. L. (2015). Effectiveness of a hybrid classroom in the
delivery of medical terminology course content relative to a traditional classroom format.
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(5), 72–81.
http://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i5.13994
Masitah, M. Y., Azizi, M., Ahamad Makmom, A., Bahaman, A. S., Ramli, B., & Noriati, A. R.
(2013). Faktor- faktor yang mempengaruhi efikasi kendiri guru sekolah menengah di
Malaysia dalam pelaksanaan pendidikan alam sekitar. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators
and Education, 28, 131–153.
McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013). Instrument development in the affective
domain: School and corporate applications. Springer Science+Business Media (3rd ed.).
New York: Springer Science+Business Media. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6
McWilliams, S. A. (2013). A 21st-century personal construct psychology upgrade. Journal of
Constructivist Psychology, 26(3), 164–171. http://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2013.787321
Mehta, A. (2014). Technology acceptance of e-learning within a blended vocational course in
West Africa. Dalam Multi Conference On Computer Science And Information Systems 2014
(hal. 324–328). Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED557293.pdf
Menzies, R., Petrie, K., & Zarb, M. (2015). A case study of Facebook use: Outlining a multi-layer
strategy for higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 1–15.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9436-y
Mirriahi, N., Alonzo, D., McIntyre, S., Kligyte, G., & Fox, B. (2015). Blended learning
innovations: Leadership and change in one Australian institution. International Journal of
Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 11(1), 4–
16. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1061471.pdf
Mohamed Amin, E., Norazah, M. N., & Ebrahim, P. (2014). Overview of blended learning.
Dalam E. Mohamed Amin (Ed.), Blended & Flipped Learning : Case Studies in Malaysian
HEIs (hal. 1). Centre for Teaching & Learning Technologies, Universiti Kebangsaan
Malaysia & Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education Malaysia. Diambil dari
http://www.moe.gov.my/cms/upload_files/publicationfile/2015/pubfile_file_002071.pdf
Mohammed Jaber, S. A., Rosnaini, M., Kamariah, A. B., & Ahmad Fauzi, M. A. (2012). Factors
influencing the use of learning management system in Saudi Arabian higher education: A
theoretical framework. Higher Education Studies, 2(2), 125–137.
http://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n2p125
Mohd Awang, I., & Dollard, M. F. (2011). Psychosocial safety climate, work conditions, and
emotions in the workplace: A Malaysian population-based work stress study. International
Journal of Stress Management, 18(4), 324–347. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024849
Mohd Nazri, A. R. (2014). Pembangunan model homeschooling berasaskan nilai dan amalan
masyarakat bagi kanak-kanak orang asli. (Tesis Kedoktoran, Universiti Malaya). Diambil
dari http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/4716/
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of
adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–
222. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
Muhamad Azhar, S., Mohamad, I., & Amri, Y. (2015). Engaging vocational college students
through blended learning: Improving class attendance and participation. Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 204(November 2014), 127–135. http://doi.org/10.1016
/j.sbspro.2015.08.125
Muraina, I. D. (2015). The factors that contribute to the continuous usage of broadband
technologies among youth in rural areas: A case of northern region of Malaysia. (Tesis
Kedoktoran). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.
Nachtigall, C., Kroehne, U., Funke, F., & Steyer, R. (2003). (Why) Should we use SEM? Pros
and cons of structural equation modeling. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 1–22.
Diambil dari http://www.dgps.de/fachgruppen/methoden/mpr-online/issue20/art1/
mpr127_11.pdf
Newby, P. (2014). Research methods for education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Newsom, J. (2017). Improper solutions in SEM. Diambil dari http://web.pdx.edu/~newsomj/
semclass/ho_improper.pdf
Nguyen, T. N. (2015). Motivational effect of web-based simulation game in teaching operations
management. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(2), 9–15.
http://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i2.565
Nor Fadzleen, S., Halina, M. D., & Haliza, Z. (2013). Derivation for design of Virtual Learning
Environment (VLE) framework for Malaysian schools. Dalam 3rd International Conference
on Research and Innovation in Information Systems, ICRIIS. http://doi.org/10.1109
/ICRIIS.2013.6716772
Norazilawati, A., Noraini, M. N., Nik Azmah, N. Y., & Rosnidar, M. (2013). Aplikasi
persekitaran pengajaran maya (Frog VLE) dalam kalangan guru sains. Jurnal Pendidikan
Sains dan Matematik, 3(2), 63–76.
Nuanmeesri, S. (2014). A design of the infrastructure and computer network for distance
education, online learning via new media, e-learning and blended learning. International
Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, 8(9),
1579–1582.
Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be
done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314.
http://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-
Hill.
Nurain, R., Balakrishnan, M., & Wan Ahmad Jaafar, W. Y. (2015). Attitude and motivation of
Malaysian secondary school students’ learning of ESL in a blended learning environment.
Dalam e-Proceeding of the Global Conference on Technology in Language Learning 2015.
http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4966.6646
Nur Syamimi, M. R., & Noraffandy, Y. (2010). Blended learning: Overcome the weaknesses of
e-learning and traditional approach. Edupress 2010. Diambil dari http://eprints.utm.my
/14929/
Nurul Farhana, J. (2013). Cabaran dalam mengimplementasi Virtual Learning Environment
(VLE) Frog dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran oleh guru di sekolah-sekolah di Malaysia.
(Tesis Sarjana). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.
O’Leary, R. (2002). Virtual learning environments. LTSN Economics and Manager of the
Learning Technology Support Service, University of Bristol. Diambil dari
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190701/
Obiedat, R., Eddeen, L. N., Harfoushi, O., Koury, A., & Alassaf, N. (2014). Effect of blendedlearning
on academic achievement of students in the University of Jordan. International
Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(2), 37–45. http://doi.org/
10.3991/ijet.v9i2.3220
Ofsted. (2009). Virtual learning environments: An evaluation of their development in a sample of
educational settings. Alexandra House. The Office for Standards in Education. Diambil dari
www.ofsted.gov.uk
Oke, A. E., Ogunsami, D. R., & Ogunlana, S. (2012). Establishing a common ground for the use
of structural equation modelling for construction related research studies. Australasian
Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 12(3), 89–94. http://doi.org/
10.5130/ajceb.v12i3.2658
Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can “Blended Learning” be redeemed? E-Learning, 2(1), 17–
26. http://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17
Osborne, J. W. (2015). What is rotating in exploratory factor analysis? Practical Assessment,
Research & Evaluation, 20(2), 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1037/e558952014-001
Padilla-Melendez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived
playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning
scenario. Computers and Education, 63, 306–317. http://doi.org/10.1016
/j.compedu.2012.12.014
Perez-Marin, D., & Pascual-Nieto, I. (2012). A case study on the use of blended learning to
encourage computer science students to study. Journal of Science Education Technology,
21, 74–82. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9283-6
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method
biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social
science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology,
63(1), 539–569. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the cvi an acceptable indicator of content
validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health (Vol. 30).
Poon, J. (2012). Use of blended learning to enhance the student learning experience and
engagement in property education. Property Management, 30(2), 129–156. http://doi.org/
10.1108/02637471211213398
Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative
strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115.
http://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. Newyork Free Press (3rd Editio). New York: The
Free Press. http://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:126680
Rouhollah, K., Habibah, A. J., Wan Zah, W. A., & Shaffe, M. D. (2015). Presence and perceived
learning in different higher education blended learning environments. International Journal
of Mobile and Blended Learning, 7(3), 59–70. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2015070104
?ad, S. N. (2012). An attitude scale for smart board use in education: Validity and reliability
studies. Computers and Education, 58(3), 900–907. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.
2011.10.017
Saiful Afzan, B., Lazim, A., Ali, A., & Yusoff, H. (2014). Pemodelan penerimaan pelajar
terhadap persekitaran pembelajaran maya (VLE). Journal of Business and Social
Development, 2(2), 36–47.
Saltson, E., & Sharon, N. (2015). The mediating and moderating effects of motivation in the
relationship between perceived organizational support and employee job performance.
International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(7), 654–667. Diambil
dari http://ijecm.co.uk/
Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety,
and attitudes toward the Internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Educational
Technology and Society, 8(4), 205–219. http://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.8.4.205
Sankaran, S., & Norazlinda, S. (2017). Adoption of technology: school location as moderator.
The Social Sciences, 12(7), 1270–1274. Diambil dari http://docsdrive.com/pdfs
/medwelljournals/sscience/2017/1270-1274.pdf
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6th
ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson.
Sauro, J. (2010). Should you use 5 or 7 point scales? Diambil dari http://www.measuringusability
.com/blog/scale-points.php
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling
(3rd Ed.). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research methods for business (5th. ed.). West Sussex, UK:
John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental
research. Research in Human Development, 6(2–3), 144–164. http://doi.org/10.1080/
15427600902911247
Seri Rahayu, H. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs and use of ICTs in malaysian smart schools: A case
study. Dalam Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011
(hal. 522–525). Diambil dari http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/downloads
/papers/Hamid-poster.pdf
Shamsuddin, H. (n.d.). Integrating ICT in teaching and learning: Countrty report: Malaysia.
Diambil dari http://woulibrary.wou.edu.my/weko/eed502/Shamsuddin_-_ICT_in_Malaysia
_Education.pdf
Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G., & Richard Francis. (2006). The undergraduate experience
of blended e-learning: A review of UK literature and practice. London: Higher Education
Academy. Diambil dari https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/sharpe_benfield
_roberts_francis_0.pdf
Shi, J., Mo, X., & Sun, Z. (2012). Content validity index in scale development. Journal of
Central South University (Medical Sciences), 37(2), 152–155. http://doi.org/
10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007
Shin, W. S., & Kang, M. (2015). The use of a mobile learning management system at an online
university and its effect on learning satisfaction and achievement. International Review of
Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 110–130.
Shivam, R., & Singh, S. (2015). Implementation of blended learning in classroom: A review
paper. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(11), 369–372.
Siang, J. J., & Santoso, H. B. (2015). Students ’ perspective of learning management system: An
empirical evidence of technology acceptance model in emerging countries. Journal of Arts,
Science & Commerce, 6(2), 1–14.
Siew-Eng, L., & Muuk, M. A. (2015). Blended learning in teaching secondary schools’ english:
A preparation for tertiary science education in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 167(October), 293–300. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.677
Simelane, S., & Mji, A. (2014). Impact of technology-engagement teaching strategy with the aid
of clickers on student’s learning style. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136,
511–521. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.367
Simeonova, B., Bogolyubov, P., Blagov, E., & Kharabsheh, R. (2014). Cross-cultural validation
of UTAUT: The case of university VLEs in Jordan, Russia and the UK. The Electronic
Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 25–34. Diambil dari
http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/69681
Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6),
51–54. http://doi.org/10.1021/es2033229
Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. ASTD
State of the Industry Report, American Society for Training & Development (CENTRA),
(March), 1–11. Diambil dari http://facilitateadultlearning.pbworks.com/f
/blendedlearning.pdf
Siti Nazuar, S. (2014). Barriers influencing teacher ’s technology integration in their teaching
practice. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(23), 352–357.
Smith, J., Groves, M., Bowd, B., & Barber, A. (2012). Facilitating the development of study
skills through a blended learning approach. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(2),
108–117. http://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p108
Songkram, N. (2015). E-learning system in virtual learning environment to develop creative
thinking for learners in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174,
674–679. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.600
Stein, J., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Essentials for blended learning: A standards-based guide.
New York: Routledge.
Stratton, T. M. (2014). A case study of the integration of 21st century technology within the
place-based, expeditionary learning outward bound (ELOB) approach to education.
Instructional Technology Education Specialist Research Papers, (16), 1–59.
http://doi.org/http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/edu-papers/16 This
Swanson, R. A. (2007). Theory framework for applied disciplines: boundaries, contributing, core,
useful, novel, and irrelevant components. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 321–
339. http://doi.org/10.1177/1534484307303770
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson
Education. Inc.
Tan, P. J. B. (2013). Applying the UTAUT to understand factors affecting the use of english elearning
websites in Taiwan. SAGE Open, 3(4), 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1177/
2158244013503837
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). Measuring the moderating effect of gender and age on elearning
acceptance in England: A structural equation modeling approach for an extended
technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(2), 163–
184. http://doi.org/10.2190/EC.51.2.b
Tay, H. Y. (2016). Investigating engagement in a blended learning course. Cogent Education,
3(1), 13. http://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1135772
Tayebinik, M., & Puteh, M. (2012). Blended learning or e-learning? International Magazine on
Advances in Computer Science and Telecommunications, 3(1), 103–110.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of
competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.
http://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
Teo, T., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2015). Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Does
gender matter ? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 235–251.
http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.v0i0.1672
Teo, T., Khlaisang, J., Thammetar, T., Ruangrit, N., Satiman, A., & Sunphakitjumnong, K.
(2014). A survey of pre-service teachers’ acceptance of technology in Thailand. Asia Pacific
Education Review, 15(4), 609–616. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9348-3
Teo, T., Luan, W. S. L., & Sing, C. C. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use
technology between Singaporean And Malaysian pre-service teachers: An application of the
technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Educational Technology and Society,
11(4), 265–280. Diambil dari http://www.ifets.info/download_pdf.php?j_id=41
&a_id=903
Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2016). The influence of teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning on
their technology acceptance. Interactive Learning Environments, 4820(March), 1–15.
http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844
Termit, K., & Noorma, H. (2015). Teachers’ readiness to utilize Frog VLE: A case study of a
Malaysian secondary school. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science
5(1), 20–29. http://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2015/11965
The JISC infoNet Service. (2006). Effective use of VLEs: Introduction to VLEs. Diambil dari
http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/InfoKits/effective-use-of-VLEs/intro-to-
VLEs/printable_version.pdf
The Oxford Group. (2013). Blended learning - current use, challenges and best practices.
Diambil dari http://www.kineo.com/elearning-reports/blended-learning-current-usechallenges-
and-best-practice.html
Thomas, T., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining
mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education
and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(3), 71–85. Diambil
dari http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=1687
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts
and applications. Washington: American Psychological Association.
http://doi.org/10.1037/10694-000 Thompson,
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. . (1991). Personal computing: Toward a
conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 124–143.
http://doi.org/10.2307/249443
Torrisi-steele, G. (2011). This thing called blended learning - a definition and planning approach.
Research and Development in Higher Education: Higher Education on the Edge, 34, 360–
371. Diambil dari http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/42960/
70212_1.pdf?sequence=1
Touray, A., & Salminen, A. (2013). The impact of moderating factors on behavioral intention
towards internet: A transnational perspective. International Journal of Computer and
Information Technology, 2(6), 1035–1041. Diambil dari www.ijcit.com
Tsai, C. W. (2015). Investigating the effects of web-mediated design thinking and co-regulated
learning on developing students’ computing skills in a blended course. Universal Access in
the Information Society, 14(2), 295–305. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0401-8
Turisiana, A. B., & Fauziah Saadah, A. H. (2014). Lecturers ’ perceptions of blended learning
readiness. Journal of Practices in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 50–63. Diambil
dari http://www.kedah.uitm.edu.my/CPLT/images/stories/v2n2/Article4.pdf
USCLibraries. (2016). Organizing your social sciences research paper: Theoretical framework.
Diambil dari http://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide
Uysal, R., Satici, S. A., Satici, B., & Akin, A. (2014). Subjective vitality as mediator and
moderator of the relationship between life satisfaction and subjective happiness.
Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 489–497. http://doi.org
/10.12738/estp.2014.2.1828
VanDerLinden, K. (2014). Blended learning as transformational institutional learning. Dalam
New Directions for Higher Education (hal. 75–85). http://doi.org/10.1002/he
Vatanartiran, S., & Karadeniz, S. (2015). A needs analysis for technology integration plan:
Challenges and needs of teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(3), 206–220.
Diambil dari http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezpustaka.upsi.edu.my/ehost/pdfviewer/
pdfviewer?sid=02839cfb-7b1d-47cb-871a-361f9d93bc8f@sessionmgr4002&vid=1&hid
=4204
Vatuiu, T., & Udric?, M. (2013). Virtual learning environment as part of lifelong learning.
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(4), 252–259. Diambil dari
http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/tojde/article/view/5000102268
Vaughan, N. (2014). Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessment
connection. Education Sciences, 4(4), 247–264. http://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4040247
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic
motivation, acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. Diambil dari
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance
model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, G. M. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for direction? Gender,
social influence and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour. MIS
Quarterly, 24(1), 115–139. http://doi.org/10.2307/3250981
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., & Ackerman, P. (2000). A longitudinal field investigation of gender
differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organizational
behavior and human decision processes, 83(1), 33–60. http://doi.org/
10.1006/obhd.2000.2896
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of
information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
http://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information
technology: Extending the unified theory. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. Diambil dari
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2002388
Virginia, W. (2014). Research methods: Triangulation. Evidence Based Library and Information
Practice, 9(1), 74–75. http://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.18438/B8WW3X
Wai, C. C., & Seng, E. L. K. (2014). Exploring the effectiveness and efficiency of blended
learning tools in a school of business. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
123(2002), 470–476. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1446
Wan Fariza Alyati, W. Z. (2012). Alvin Toffler: Knowledge, technology and change in future
society. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 1(June), 54–61. Diambil dari
http://www.ukm.my/ijit/IJIT Vol 1 2012/7wan fariza.pdf
Wan Zah, W. A., Hajar, M. N., Azimi, H., & Hayati, A. (2009). The conditions and level of ICT
integration in Malaysian Smart Schools. International Journal of Education and
Development using ICT, 5(2), 21–31. Diambil dari http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//
viewarticle.php?id=618&layout=html
Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: Using a
Complex Adaptive Systems Framework. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 380–
393. Diambil dari http://www.ifets.info/journals/18_2/28.pdf
Wayne, J. (2012). Effective learning - blended learning and virtual learning environment. Diambil
dari http://www.selfgrowth.com/articles/effective-learning-blended-learning-and-virtuallearning-
environment
Wei, W. (2009). A technology acceptance model: Mediate and moderate effect. Asia Pacific
Management Review, 14(4), 461–476. Diambil dari http://apmr.management.ncku.edu.tw/
comm/updown/DW0911102983.pdf
Wong, G. K. W. (2014). Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers of primary
mathematics: A pilot study in Hong Kong. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,
31(6), 713–735. Diambil dari http://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/viewFile/1890/1326
Wong, K. T., Rosma, O., Goh, P. S. C., & Mohd Khairezan, R. (2013). Understanding student
teachers ’ behavioural intention to use technology: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
validation and testing. International Journal of Instruction, 6(1), 89–105. Diambil dari
http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2013_1_6.pdf
Wong, K. T., Teo, T., & Goh, P. S. C. (2014). Development of the interactive whiteboard
acceptance scale (IWBAS): an Anitial study. Educational Technology and Society, 17(4),
268–277. Diambil dari http://www.ifets.info/journals/17_4/18.pdf
Wong, L., Tatnall, A., & Burgess, S. (2014). A framework for investigating blended learning
effectiveness. Education + Training, 56(2), 233–251. http://doi.org/10.1108/ET-04-2013-
0049
Wu, Y., Wen, M., Chen, C., & Hsu, I. (2016). An integrated BIM and cost estimating blended
learning model – acceptance differences between experts and novice. Eurasia Journal of
Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1347–1363. http://doi.org
/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1517a
Xin, H., Kempland, M., & Blankson, F. H. (2015). Adaptability and replicability of webfacilitated,
hybrid, and online learning in an undergraduate exercise psychology course.
Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 19–30. Diambil dari
http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i1/1413.pdf
Yaghmale, F. (2003). Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education, 3(1),
25–27. Diambil dari http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/jme/article/download/870/769.
Yapici, ?. Ü., & Akbayin, H. (2012). The effect of blended learning model on high school
students’ biology achievement and on their attitudes towards the internet. The Turkish
Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 228–237. Diambil dari
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ989031.pdf
Yeasmin, S., & Rahman, K. F. (2012). “Triangulation” research method as the tool of social
science research. Bup Journal, 1(1), 154–163. Diambil dari http://www.bup.edu.bd
/journal/154-163.pdf
Yeou, M. (2016). An investigation of students acceptance of moodle in a blended learning setting
using technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(3),
300–318. http://doi.org/10.1177/0047239515618464
Yu, Z., & Yuexiu, Z. (2015). Blended learning over two decades. International Journal of
Information and Communication Technology Education, 11(3), 1–19. http://doi.org/
10.4018/IJICTE.2015070101
Zaharah, H., Saedah, S., Ghazali, D., & Nur Hasbuna, M. S. (2015). Kajian model blended
learning dalam jurnal terpilih: Satu analisa kandungan. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran
Asia Pasifik, 3(1), 20–31. Diambil dari juku.um.edu.my
Zainudin, A. (2015). SEM Made Simple: A gentle approach to learning structural equation
modeling. Bangi: MPWS Rich Publication.
Zainudin, A., Asyraf, A., & Mustafa, M. (2016). The Likert scale analysis using parametric based
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 4(1), 13–
21. Diambil dari http://cmss.univnt.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split/vol_IV_issue_1/
CMSS_vol_IV_issue_1_art.002.pdf
Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Yan, W., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Users’ continuance intention of virtual
learning community services: The moderating role of usage experience. Interactive
Learning Environments, 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1172242
Zuraidah, Z. (2014). The effects of customer-brand relationship investments on customer
engagement. (Tesis Kedoktoran). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
Zuraidah, Z., Norjaya, M. Y., Nor Asiah, O., & Nik M. Hazrul, N. H. (2014). Determining the
key factors of customer–brand relationship investment dimensions: Insights from Malaysian
mobile phone users. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 13(4), 318–342.
http://doi.org/10.1080/15332667.2014.965649