Abdelmalak, M. M. M. (2015). Web 2.0 technologies and building online learning communities:

Students’ perspectives. Online Learning, 19(2), 87–106. Diambil dari

http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1062942.pdf

 

Abdulahi, A. A., NorHidayati, Z., & Elmi, A. H. (2012). An evaluation of virtual learning

environment readiness in higher education institutions (HEIs). Journal of Information

Systems Research and Innovation, 2, 86–94. Diambil dari http://seminar.

utmspace.edu.my/jisri/

 

Abdul Wahab, L. (2012). A modification of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of

Technology (UTAUT) from users’ perspectives of Telecentre in Nigeria. (Tesis Kedoktoran,

Universiti Utara Malaysia). Diambil dari http://etd.uum.edu.my/3379/

 

Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An

investigation in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance

Learning, 14(5), 82–107. Diambil dari http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/

viewFile/1631/2749

 

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Dalam Orgnizational Behavior and Human

Decision Processes 50 (hal. 179–211). Academic Press, Inc. http://doi.org/10.1016/0749-

5978(91)90020-T

 

Al-Najjar, G. M. (2012). Mobile information systems: An empirical analysis of the determinants

of mobile commerce acceptance in Jordan. (Tesis Kedoktoran). Universiti Utara Malaysia,

Kedah, Malaysia.

 

Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three

different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440–

454. Diambil dari http://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/693/1061

 

Alavifar, A., Karimimalayer, M., & Mohd Khairol, A. (2012). Structural equation modeling VS

multiple regression. Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal

(ESTIJ), 2(2), 326–329. Diambil dari http://www.estij.org/papers/vol2no22012/

5vol2no2.pdf

 

Alghanmi, S. (2014). Investigating the interpersonal and contextual factors govern Saudi

lecturers’ motivation in creating innovative blended learning environment that web 2.0-

based. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3), 96–106. Diambil dari

http://www.tojet.net/articles/v13i3/13311.pdf

 

Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding

academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International

Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143–155. Diambil dari

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.428.9465&rep=rep1&type=pdf

 

Ali, M. F., Joyes, G., & Ellison, L. (2013). Using blended learning to enhance students’ cognitive

presence. Proceedings - 2013 International Conference on Informatics and Creative

Multimedia, ICICM 2013, 202–208. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICICM.2013.42

 

Almasaeid, T. F. (2014). The effect of using blended learning strategy on achievement and 9th

grade students. European Scientific Journal, 10(31), 133–145. Diambil dari

http://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/viewFile/4573/4370

 

Alotaibi, K. N. R. (2013). The effect of blended learning on developing critical thinking skills.

Education Journal, 2(4), 176–185. http://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20130204.21

 

Alshibly, H. (2014). An empirical investigation into factors influencing the intention to use elearning

system: An extended technology acceptance model. British Journal of Applied

Science & Technology, 4(17), 2440–2457. Diambil dari

http://www.journalrepository.org/media/journals/BJAST_5/2014/Apr/Alshibly4172014BJA

ST10033_1.pdf

 

Althunibat, A. (2015). Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use m-learning

in Jordan higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 65–71.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.046

 

Ana Haziqah, A. R. (2014). Teacher’s perception towards virtual learning environment. (Tesis

Sarjana). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.

 

Aravamudhan, N. R., & Krishnaveni, R. (2015). Establishing and reporting content validity

evidence of new Training and Development Capacity Building Scale (TDCBS).

Management: Journal of Contemporary Management, 20(1), 131–158. Diambil dari

http://hrcak.srce.hr/141598?lang=en

 

Attuquayefio, S. N., & Addo, H. (2014). Using the UTAUT model to analyze students ’ ICT

adoption. Journal of Technology, 10(3), 75–86. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/

fulltext/EJ1059042.pdf

 

Azlah, M. J., & Fariza, K. (2014). Keberkesanan kemahiran komunikasi di kalangan guru dalam

penggunaan persekitaran pembelajaran maya (Frog VLE). Dalam K. Fariza, D. Md Yusoff,

& A. R. Mohd Jasmy (Ed.), Aliran Terkini Dalam Pengajaran Sumber Dan Teknologi

Maklumat:Impaknya ke atas Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan 2014 (hal. 63–69). Bangi:

Penerbit Fakulti Pendidikan, UKM.

 

Azlina, A. B., Fahmi Zaidi, A. R., & Wan Salihin, W. A. (2013). Assessing the effects of

UTAUT and self-determination predictor on students continuance intention to use student

portal. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(10), 1484–1489. http://doi.org/10.5829

/idosi.wasj.2013.21.10.2920

 

Bachman, C., & Scherer, R. (2015). Promoting student autonomy and competence using a hybrid

model for teaching physical activity. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1). Diambil dari

http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2015_1_1.pdf

 

Banas, J. R., & York, C. S. (2014). Authentic learning exercises as a means to influence

preservice teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy and intentions to integrate

technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 728–746.

http://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2014070105

 

Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. Social Learning Theory. New York: General

Learning Press.

 

Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. The American psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.

http://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1175

 

Banyen, W., Viriyavejakul, C., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2016). A Blended learning model for learning

achievement enhancement of Thai undergraduate students. International Journal of

Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4), 48–55. http://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i04.5325

 

Barker, J. (2015). Benefits of hybrid classes in community colleges. Contemporary Issues In

Education Research, 8(3), 143–146. Diambil dari http://cluteinstitute.com/ojs/index.php/

CIER/article/viewFile/9343/9393

 

Barker, J., & Gossman, P. (2013). The learning impact of a virtual learning environment:

Students’ views. Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal, 5(2), 19–38. Diambil

dari http://194.81.189.19/ojs/index.php/TEAN/article/viewFile/146/261

 

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social

psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of

Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

 

Barrio-garcía, S., Arquero, J. L., & Romero-frías, E. (2015). Personal learning environments

acceptance model: The role of need for cognition , e-learning satisfaction and students ’

perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 129–141. Diambil dari

http://www.ifets.info/journals/18_3/10.pdf

 

Bath, D., & Bourke, J. (2010). Getting started with blended learning. Diambil dari

https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/267178/Getting_started_with_blend

ed_learning_guide.pdf

 

Belapurkar, A. M. (2013). Blended learning for effective remote learning. Scholarly Research

Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, (Special Issue), 1–9. Diambil dari http://srjis.com/wpcontent/

uploads/2016/01/3.2-ANITA-BELAPURKAR.pdf

 

Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices (2nd Ed.).

USF Tampa Bay Open Access Textbooks Collection: Creative Commons Attribution.

 

Bottge, B. A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M. D., Butler, M., & Cho, S.-J. (2014). Effects of

blended instructional models on math performance. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 423–437.

http://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527240

 

Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and

implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a

cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/

10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006

 

Briggs, K. C. (2014). Blended learning vs face-to-face instruction: A quantitative evaluation of

student achievement in Algebra I. (Tesis Kedoktoran, Northcentral University). Diambil dari

https://library.ncu.edu/diss/GetAbstract/4487

 

Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. Dalam R. H. Hoyle (Ed.),

HandBook of Structural Equation Modeling (hal. 361–376). New York: The Guilford Press.

 

Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information

and communication technology into teaching: a review of the literature. International

Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology,

8(1), 136–155. Diambil dari http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//viewarticle.php?id=1361

 

Carman, J. M. (2005). Blended learning design: 5 key ingredients. Instructional Design. Diambil

dari http://www.agilantlearning.com/instructionaldesign.html

 

Cassum, S. H., Allana, S., & Dias, J. (2016). Blended Learning across Disciplines: Models for

Implementation. Journal of Education and Training Studies (Vol. 4). http://doi.org/

10.11114/jets.v4i1.1168

 

Çevik, Y. D., Da?han, G., Barin, S., & Savran, R. (2015). Examining information and

communication technologies preservice teachers ’ views on technology integration and their

roles in this process. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 11(4), 1143–1166.

Diambil dari http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezpustaka.upsi.edu.my/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?

sid=032be052-c7c6-4214-9b27-9054d72c511b@sessionmgr4004&vid=13&hid=4204

 

Chan, W. T. Y., & Leung, C. H. (2016). The use of social media for blended learning in tertiary

education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 771–778. http://doi.org/

10.13189/ujer.2016.040414

 

Chang, C. C., Shu, K. M., Liang, C., Tseng, J. S., & Hsu, Y. S. (2014). Is blended e-learning as

measured by an achievement test and self-assessment better than traditional classroom

learning for vocational high school students? International Review of Research in Open and

Distance Learning, 15(2), 213–231. Diambil dari http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/

article/view/1708/2890

 

Cheok, M. L., & Wong, S. L. (2016). Frog virtual learning environment for Malaysian schools:

Exploring teachers’ experience. Dalam J. Zhang, J. Yang, M. Chang, & T. Chang (Ed.), ICT

in Education in Global Context, Lecture Notes in Educational Technology (hal. 201–209).

Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-

43927-2

 

Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology

applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in k-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis.

Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001

 

Chew, E. (2008). Book review: Blended learning tools for teaching and training. Educational

Technology & Society, 11(2), 344–347. Diambil dari http://www.jstor.org/stable/

jeductechsoci.11.2.344

 

Chew, E., A.Turner, D., & Jones, N. (2010). In love and war: Blended learning theories for

computer scientists and educationists. Dalam F. L. Wang, J. Fong, & R. C. Kwan (Ed.),

Handbook of Research on Hybrid Learning Models: Advanced Tools, Technologies, and

Applications (hal. 1–23). Hershey: Information Science Reference.

 

Chibás-Ortíz, F., Borroto-Carmona, G., & De-Almeida-Santos, F. (2014). Managing creativity in

collaborative virtual learning environments: A DL corporate project. Media Education

Reseacrh Journal, 22, 143–151. http://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-14

 

Chiemeke, S., & Evwiekpaefe, A. (2011). A conceptual framework of a modified unified theory

of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model with Nigerian factors in e-commerce

adoption. Educational Research, 2(December), 1719–1726. Diambil dari

http://interesjournal.org/ER/pdf/2011/December/Chiemeke and Evwiekpaefe.pdf

 

Chien, T. C. (2012). Computer self-efficacy and factors influencing e-learning effectiveness.

European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 670–686.

http://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255539

 

Chua, Y. P. (2014a). Kaedah penyelidikan (3rd ed.). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2014b). Ujian regresi, analisis faktor dan analisis SEM (2nd ed.). Kuala Lumpur:

McGraw-Hill.

 

Cimermanová, I. (2013). Teacher training in the virtual learning environment. International

Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(10), 1–8.

 

Cohen, L., Lawrence, M., & Keith, M. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New

York: Routledge.

 

Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for

computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118–143. Diambil dari

http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.118

 

Cooke, V. (2014). An evaluation of the use of blended learning strategies to develop and enhance

students’ knowledge of primary science. Worcester Journal of Learning and Teaching, (9).

Diambil dari http://www.worc.ac.uk/edu/documents/Blended_Learning_Strategies_for_

Primary_Science_Cooke.pdf

 

Co?kunçay, D. F., & Özkan, S. (2013). A model for instructors’ adoption of learning management

systems: Empirical validation in higher education context. The Turkish Online Journal of

Educational Technology, 12(2), 13–25. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov

/fulltext/EJ1015409.pdf

 

Crawford, C., Barker, J., & Seyam, A. (2014). The promising role of hybrid learning in

community colleges: Looking towards the future. Contemporary Issues In Education

Research, 7(3), 237–243. http://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.19030/cier.v7i3.8645

 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative

and qualitative research (4th. ed.). Boston: Pearson.

 

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of

information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. http://doi.org/doi.org/10.2307

/249008

 

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology:

A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8). http://doi.org/

http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

 

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use

computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.

http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x

 

Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal

of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7

 

De?man, M. (2015). Modeling the acceptance of e-learning in mandatory environments of higher

education: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in Human Behavior,

49, 272–281. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.022

 

Demirer, V., & Sahin, I. (2013). Effect of blended learning environment on transfer of learning:

An experimental study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 518–529.

http://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12009

 

Dillon, W. R., Kumar, A., & Mulani, N. (1987). Offending estimates in covariance structure

analysis: Comments on the causes of and solutions to Heywood cases. Psychological

Bulletin, 101(1), 126–135. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.126

 

Downing, C. E., Spears, J., & Holtz, M. (2014). Transforming a course to blended learning for

student engagement. Education Research International, 2014, 10. http://doi.org/

10.1155/2014/430732

 

Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1(4), 1–4. Diambil

dari http://www-07.ibm.com/services/pdf/blended_learning.pdf

 

Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of research

trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. Internet and Higher Education,

17, 90–100. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003

 

Eryilmaz, M. (2015). The effectiveness of blended learning environments. Contemporary Issues

In Education Research, 8(4), 251–256. http://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v8i4.9433

 

Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the technology acceptance model

(TAM) to examine faculty use of learning management systems (LMSs) in higher education

institutions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 210–232. Diambil

dari http://www.researchgate.net/publication/281842180

 

Feinberg, F. M. (2012). Mediation analysis and categorical variables: Some further frontiers.

Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 595–598. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.03.007

 

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th Ed.). London: SAGE

Publications Ltd.

 

Fielding, N. G. (2012). Triangulation and mixed methods designs: Data integration with new

research technologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 24(3), 226–238.

http://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437101

 

Finstad, K. (2010). Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales.

Journal of Usability Studies, 5(3), 104–110. Diambil dari http://uxpajournal.org/wpcontent/

uploads/pdf/JUS_Finstad_May_2010.pdf

 

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to

theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

 

Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological

Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. Diambil dari papers://e7d065ae-9998-4287-8af0-

c9fa85af8e96/Paper/p44071

 

Foong Mae, C. (2002). ICT in Malaysian schools: Policy and strategies. Education Technology

Division, Ministry of Education, Malaysia. Diambil dari http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc

/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan011288.pdf

 

Francis, R., & Shannon, S. J. (2013). Engaging with blended learning to improve students’

learning outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 359–369.

http://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2013.766679

 

FrogAsia. (2014). Frog Asia; What is the Frog VLE? Diambil dari http://whatisthe.

blogspot.ca/2010/04/what-is-accuracy-of-dgps.html

 

Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods

variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008

 

Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing statistical assumptions. Asheboro, NC USA: Statistical Associates

Publishing.

 

Garson, G. D. (2015). Structural equation modeling. Asheboro, NC USA: Statistical Associates

Publishing.

 

Gaskin, J. (2011). Common method bias. Diambil 20 Januari 2017, dari http://youtube.com/

Gaskination

 

Gaskin, J. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Diambil dari http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com/

 

Gaskin, J. (2015). Mediation concepts and bootstrapping in AMOS. Diambil dari

http://youtube.com/Gaskination

 

Gaskin, J. (2016a). 2 way interactions. Stats Tools Package. Diambil dari http://statwiki.

kolobkreations.com

 

Gaskin, J. (2016b). Confirmatory factor analysis. Diambil 3 Januari 2017, dari http://statwiki.

kolobkreations.com

 

Gaskin, J. (2016c). Data screening. Diambil 3 Januari 2017, dari http://statwiki.

kolobkreations.com/

 

Gaskin, J. (2016d). Mediation. Diambil dari http://youtube.com/Gaskination

 

Gaskin, J. (2016e). Multi-group analysis. Diambil dari http://youtube.com/Gaskination

 

Gaskin, J. (2016f). MyIndirectEffects.AmosEstimandVB. Gaskination’s Statistics. Diambil dari

http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com

 

Gaskin, J. (2016g). Structural equation modeling. Diambil 25 Januari 2017, dari http://statwiki.

kolobkreations.com

 

Gaskin, J. (2016h). Validity and reliability. Diambil 21 Januari 2017, dari http://statwiki.

kolobkreations.com

 

Gaskin, J. (2016i). Validity master. Stats Tools Package. Diambil dari http://statwiki.

kolobkreations.com

 

Geçer, A., & Da?, F. (2012). A blended learning experience. Educational Sciences: Theory &

Practice, 12(1), 438–443. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ978452.pdf

 

Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1987). Improper solutions in the analysis of covariance

structures: Their interpretability and a comparison of alternate respecifications.

Psychometrika, 52(1), 99–111. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293958

 

Gibbs, C. (2003). Explaining effective teaching: Self-efficacy and thought control of action.

Journal of Educational Enquiry, 4(2), 1–14. Diambil dari http://ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/

EDEQ/article/download/520/390

 

Gö?ü?, A., Nistor, N., & Lerche, T. (2012). Educational technology acceptance across cultures: a

validation of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in the context of turkish

national culture. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 394–408.

Diambil dari http://www.tojet.net/articles/v11i4/11440.pdf

 

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions.

Dalam C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Ed.), The Handbook of blended learning: Global

Perspectives, local designs. (hal. A1–A88). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.

http://doi.org/10.2307/4022859

 

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. Dalam M. G. Moore

(Ed.), Handbook Of Distance Education (3rd. ed., hal. 333–350). New York: Routledge.

Diambil dari https://www.academia.edu/2068375/Emerging_practice_and_research_

in_blended_learning

 

Graham, C. R., & Dziuban, C. (2008). Blended learning environments. Dalam J. David, M. J.

Spector, M. Driscoll, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Ed.), Handbook

of research on educational communications and technology (3, revised ed., hal. 269–276).

New York: Routledge. http://doi.org/10.1080/02652030701883203

 

Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for

blended learning research. Dalam A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Ed.),

Blended learning: Research Perspectives (Vol. 2, hal. 13–33). New York: Routledge.

Diambil dari https://www.academia.edu/3623333/Developing_models_and_theory_for_

blended_learning_research

 

Güler, B., & ?ah?n, M. (2015). The effect of blended learning method on preservice elementary

science teachers’ attitudes toward technology, self-regulation and science process skills.

Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 108–127. http://doi.org/

10.17522/nefefmed.17511

 

Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: An in depth

analysis of literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4596–4603.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992

 

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis.

Pearson Education Limited (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

 

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least

squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.

 

Hair Jr., J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM :

updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal Multivariate Data

Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624

 

Hall, S., & Villareal, D. (2015). The hybrid advantage: Graduate student perspectives of hybrid

education courses. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,

27(1), 69–80. Diambil dari http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/

 

Hamzah, M. I., Embi, M. A., & Ismail, A. (2010). ICT and diversity in learners’ attitude on smart

school initiative. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 728–737.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.099

 

Hauser, R., Paul, R., & Bradley, J. (2012). Computer self-efficacy, anxiety, and learning in online

versus face to face medium. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11,

141–154. Diambil dari http://jite.informingscience.org/documents/Vol11/JITEv11p141-

154Hauser0910.pdf

 

Hayes, A. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable moderation,

mediation, and conditional process modeling. White paper. Diambil dari

http://www.afhayes.com/ public/process2012.pdf

 

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis.

New York: The Guilford Press.

 

Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical

independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3),

451–470. http://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028

 

Heckman, R., Østerlund, C. S., & Saltz, J. (2015). Blended learning at the boundary: Designing a

new internship. Online Learning, 19(3), 111–128. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov

/fulltext/EJ1067509.pdf

 

Henrie, C. R., Bodily, R., Manwaring, K. C., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Exploring intensive

longitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning. International Review of

Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 131–155. Diambil dari

http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2015/3386

 

Herkersdorf, M. (2014). Virtual blended learning. Global English PEARSON. Diambil dari

http://now.eloqua.com/e/er?s=2111&lid=439&elq=%3Cspanclass=eloquaemail%3Erecipien

tid%3C/span%3E

 

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Using blended learning: Evidence-based practices. New

York: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-089-6

 

Hiong, S. N., & Umbit, A. F. (2015). A pilot study on factors affecting the use of frog virtual

learning environment. Jurnal Pendidikan IPG, 12, 1–17. Diambil dari

http://www.ipbl.edu.my/portal/penyelidikan/jurnalpapers/jurnal2015/Siaw NH_Agatha.pdf

 

Hisham, D., Mohd Sobri, D. @ A. W., & Hamzah, A. R. (2012). Action research on blended

learningtransformative potential in higher education- learners’ perspectives. Business and

Management Research, 1(2), 125–134. http://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v1n2p125

 

Hofmann, J. (2014). Solutions to the top 10 challenges of blended learning. Boston. Diambil dari

https://www.insynctraining.com/pages/SolutionstotheTop10ChallengesofBlendedLearning.p

df

 

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for

determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

Diambil dari http://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=buschmanart

 

Hoque, K. E., Ahmad Zabidi, A. R., & Fatema Zohora, M. (2012). ICT utilization among school

teachers and principals in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in

Progressive Education and Development, 1(4), 17–34. Diambil dari

https://umexpert.um.edu.my/file/publication/00005891_85801.pdf

 

Huang, R., Ma, D., & Zhang, H. (2008). Towards a design theory of blended learning curriculum.

Dalam J. Fong, R. Kwan, & F. L. Wang (Ed.), Hybrid Learning and Education (hal. 66–78).

Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85170-7

 

Hung, M. (2015). Teacher readiness for online learning: Scale development and teacher

perception. Computers & Education, 94, 120–133. http://doi.org/10.1016

/j.compedu.2015.11.012

 

Hur, W.-M., Kim, H., & Kim, W.-M. (2014). The moderating roles of gender and age in tablet

computer adoption. Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 17(1), 33–39.

http://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0435

 

Hussein, A. (2009). The use of triangulation in social sciences research: Can qualitative and

quantitative methods be combined? Journal of Comparative Social Work, 1, 1–12. Diambil

dari http://www.bnemid.byethost14.com/NURSING RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

5.pdf?i=1

 

Ibrahim, M., Ahmad Shidki, M. Y., Wan Salihin Wong, A., & Fahmi Zaidi, A. R. (2015). Factors

contributing pre-school trainees teachers adoption of virtual learning environment:

Malaysian evidence. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 73–79.

Diambil dari http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i2/14210.pdf

 

Isiguzel, B. (2014). The blended learning environment on the foreign language learning process:

A balance for motivation and achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-

TOJDE, 15(3(10)), 108–122.

 

Isman, A., Abanmy, F. A. A., Hussein, H. B., Al Sandany, M. A., Barakat, H., Saadany, A., &

Abdelrahman, M. (2012). Using blended learning in developing student teachers teaching

skills. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 336–345.

 

Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research methods and statistics a critical thinking approach. Cengage

Learning (5th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning. Diambil dari

https://books.google.com.my/books?id=rTZ-BAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=

gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false

 

Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: How teachers

balance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information Technology

Education, 13, 121–140. Diambil dari http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol13/JITEv13

ResearchP121-140Jeffrey0460.pdf

 

Jick, T. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Qualitative

Methodology, 24(4), 602–611. http://doi.org/10.2307/2392366

 

Jöreskog, K. G. (1999). How large can a standardized coefficient be? Diambil dari

http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/HowLargeCanaStandardizedCoefficientbe.pdf

 

Kabakçi Yurdakul, I., Ursava?, Ö. F., & Becit ??çitürk, G. (2014). An integrated approach for

preservice teachers’ acceptance and use of technology: UTAUT-PST scale. Eurasian

Journal of Educational Research, (55), 21–36. http://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.55.2

 

Kahn, J. (2014). Reporting Mediation and Moderation. Diambil dari http://my.ilstu.edu/~jhkahn

/medmod.html

 

Kazu, I. Y., & Demirkol, M. (2014). Effect of blended learning environment model on high

school students’ academic achievement. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational

Technology, 13(1), 78–87.

 

Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia. (2014). Maklum balas ke atas laporan Ketua Audit Negara

siri 3. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Diambil dari https://www.audit.gov.my/images/pdf/LKAN2013

/Persekutuan/Siri3/LKAN2013 _ Persekutuan MaklumBalas Siri 3 MASTER.pdf

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 -

2025. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Diambil dari http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/

Preliminary-Blueprint-ExecSummary-BM.pdf

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Kajian antarabangsa pengajaran dan pembelajaran

2013. Putrajaya, Malaysia.

 

Khan, A., Fleva, E., & Qazi, T. (2015). Role of self-esteem and general self-efficacy in teachers’

efficacy in primary schools. Psychology, 6(January), 117–125. http://doi.org/

10.4236/psych.2015.61010

 

Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., Pascot, D., & Bytha, A. (2014). UTAUT model for blended learning:

The role of gender and age in the intention to use webinars. Interdisciplinary Journal of ELearning

and Learning Objects, 10, 33–52.

 

Khlaisang, J., & Mingsiritham, K. (2016). Engaging virtual learning environment system to

enhance communication and collaboration skills among ASEAN higher education learners.

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 103–113. http://doi.org/

10.3991/ijet.v11i04.5503

 

Kinzie, M. B., Delcourt, M. a B., & Powers, S. M. (1994). Computer technologies: Attitudes and

self efficacy across undergraduate disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 35(6), 745–

768. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED357064.pdf

 

Klimova, B. F. (2015). Teaching and learning enhanced by information and communication

technologies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 898–902. http://doi.org/

10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.112

 

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice Of structural equation modeling (3rd. Ed.). New

York: The Guilford Press.

 

Kong, S. C., Chan, T.-W., Griffin, P., Hoppe, U., Huang, R., Kinshuk, … Yu, S. (2014). Elearning

in school education in the coming 10 years for developing 21st century skills:

Critical research issues and policy implications. Education Technology & Society, 17(1),

70–78. Diambil dari http://chan.lst.ncu.edu.tw/publications/2014-E-learning in school

education.pdf

 

Korkmaz, O., & Karakus, U. (2009). The impact of blended learning model on student attitudes

towards geography course and their critical thinking dispositions and levels. The Turkish

Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(4), 51–63. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov

/fulltext/EJ859497.pdf

 

Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities.

Educational And Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. http://doi.org/10.1177

/001316447003000308

 

Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. Handbook of Survey

Research. Diambil dari http://books.google.com/books?id=mMPDPXpTP-0C&pgis=1

 

Kulviwat, S., Bruner, G. C., & Neelankavil, J. P. (2014). Self-efficacy as an antecedentce of

cognition and affect in technology acceptance. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31(3), 190–

199. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

 

Kumutha, R., & Hamidah, Y. (2014). Barriers teachers face in integrating ICT during english

lessons: A case study. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 11–

19.

 

Lai, E. R., & Viering, M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: Integrating research findings.

National Council on Measurement in Education, (April), 66. Diambil dari

http://researchnetwork.pearson.com/wp-content/uploads/Assessing_21st_Century_Skills_

NCME.pdf

 

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical

data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. http://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

 

Lauri, M. A. (2011). Triangulation of data analysis techniques. Papers of Social Representations,

20, 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153842

 

Lee, L.-T., & Hung, J. C. (2015). Effects of blended e-learning: A case study in higher education

tax learning setting. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 5(1), 13.

http://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-015-0024-3

 

Leila, K., & Tunku Badariah, T. A. (2013). Perceived learning and satisfaction in a blended

teacher education program: An experience of Malaysian teacher trainees. Contemporary

Educational Technology, 4(3), 197–211. Diambil dari http://www.cedtech.net/

articles/43/434.pdf

 

Lihitkar, S. R. (2013). Designing a prototype virtual learning environment for library and

information science students. Library Hi Tech News, 30(4), 13–15.

http://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-04-2013-0019

 

Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2007). Online vs. Blended Learning: Differences in

instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning

Networks, 11, 27–42. http://doi.org/184.168.109.199

 

Lim, K., & Hwa, M. (2015). A case study of the experiences of instructors and students in a

Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) with different cultural backgrounds. Asia Pacific

Education Review, 16(4), 613–626. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9400-y

 

Lin, Q. (2009). Student views of hybrid learning: A one-year exploratory study. Journal of

Computing in Teacher Education, 25(2), 57–66.

 

Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2007). Preparing for blended e-learning. London: Routledge.

http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00870_8.x

 

Liu, W., & Yu, H. (2012). Effectiveness study of english learning in blended learning

environment. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 524–530.

http://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.3.524-530

 

Lo, M. C., Ramayah, T., & Mohamad, A. A. (2015). Does intention really lead to actual use of

technology? A study of an e-learning system among university students in Malaysia.

Croatian Journal of Education, 17(3), 835–863. http://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v17i3.1085

 

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing

ResearchResearch, 35(6), 382–385. http://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

 

Machado, L. J., & Chung, C. (2015). Integrating technology: The principals’ role and effect.

International Education Studies, 8(5), 43–53. http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n5p43

 

Maitland, A. (2009). Should I label all scale points or just the end points for attitudinal questions?

Survey Practice, 2(4). Diambil dari http://www.surveypractice.org/index.php/

SurveyPractice/rt/printerFriendly/172/html

 

Maranguni?, N., & Grani?, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from

1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95.

http://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

 

Marcinkowski, B., & Wrycza, S. (2015). CASE tools’ acceptance in higher education -

assessment and enhanced UTAUT model. Dalam 2015 Proceedings of the Conference on

Information Systems Applied Research (hal. 1–9). Diambil dari

http://proc.conisar.org/2015/pdf/3671.pdf

 

Martin, J. S., Kreiger, J. E., & Apicerno, A. L. (2015). Effectiveness of a hybrid classroom in the

delivery of medical terminology course content relative to a traditional classroom format.

Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(5), 72–81.

http://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i5.13994

 

Masitah, M. Y., Azizi, M., Ahamad Makmom, A., Bahaman, A. S., Ramli, B., & Noriati, A. R.

(2013). Faktor- faktor yang mempengaruhi efikasi kendiri guru sekolah menengah di

Malaysia dalam pelaksanaan pendidikan alam sekitar. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators

and Education, 28, 131–153.

 

McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013). Instrument development in the affective

domain: School and corporate applications. Springer Science+Business Media (3rd ed.).

New York: Springer Science+Business Media. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7135-6

 

McWilliams, S. A. (2013). A 21st-century personal construct psychology upgrade. Journal of

Constructivist Psychology, 26(3), 164–171. http://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2013.787321

 

Mehta, A. (2014). Technology acceptance of e-learning within a blended vocational course in

West Africa. Dalam Multi Conference On Computer Science And Information Systems 2014

(hal. 324–328). Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED557293.pdf

 

Menzies, R., Petrie, K., & Zarb, M. (2015). A case study of Facebook use: Outlining a multi-layer

strategy for higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 1–15.

http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9436-y

 

Mirriahi, N., Alonzo, D., McIntyre, S., Kligyte, G., & Fox, B. (2015). Blended learning

innovations: Leadership and change in one Australian institution. International Journal of

Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 11(1), 4–

16. Diambil dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1061471.pdf

 

Mohamed Amin, E., Norazah, M. N., & Ebrahim, P. (2014). Overview of blended learning.

Dalam E. Mohamed Amin (Ed.), Blended & Flipped Learning : Case Studies in Malaysian

HEIs (hal. 1). Centre for Teaching & Learning Technologies, Universiti Kebangsaan

Malaysia & Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education Malaysia. Diambil dari

http://www.moe.gov.my/cms/upload_files/publicationfile/2015/pubfile_file_002071.pdf

 

Mohammed Jaber, S. A., Rosnaini, M., Kamariah, A. B., & Ahmad Fauzi, M. A. (2012). Factors

influencing the use of learning management system in Saudi Arabian higher education: A

theoretical framework. Higher Education Studies, 2(2), 125–137.

http://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n2p125

 

Mohd Awang, I., & Dollard, M. F. (2011). Psychosocial safety climate, work conditions, and

emotions in the workplace: A Malaysian population-based work stress study. International

Journal of Stress Management, 18(4), 324–347. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024849

 

Mohd Nazri, A. R. (2014). Pembangunan model homeschooling berasaskan nilai dan amalan

masyarakat bagi kanak-kanak orang asli. (Tesis Kedoktoran, Universiti Malaya). Diambil

dari http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/4716/

 

Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of

adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–

222. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192

 

Muhamad Azhar, S., Mohamad, I., & Amri, Y. (2015). Engaging vocational college students

through blended learning: Improving class attendance and participation. Procedia - Social

and Behavioral Sciences, 204(November 2014), 127–135. http://doi.org/10.1016

/j.sbspro.2015.08.125

 

Muraina, I. D. (2015). The factors that contribute to the continuous usage of broadband

technologies among youth in rural areas: A case of northern region of Malaysia. (Tesis

Kedoktoran). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.

 

Nachtigall, C., Kroehne, U., Funke, F., & Steyer, R. (2003). (Why) Should we use SEM? Pros

and cons of structural equation modeling. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 1–22.

Diambil dari http://www.dgps.de/fachgruppen/methoden/mpr-online/issue20/art1/

mpr127_11.pdf

 

Newby, P. (2014). Research methods for education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

 

Newsom, J. (2017). Improper solutions in SEM. Diambil dari http://web.pdx.edu/~newsomj/

semclass/ho_improper.pdf

 

Nguyen, T. N. (2015). Motivational effect of web-based simulation game in teaching operations

management. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(2), 9–15.

http://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i2.565

 

Nor Fadzleen, S., Halina, M. D., & Haliza, Z. (2013). Derivation for design of Virtual Learning

Environment (VLE) framework for Malaysian schools. Dalam 3rd International Conference

on Research and Innovation in Information Systems, ICRIIS. http://doi.org/10.1109

/ICRIIS.2013.6716772

 

Norazilawati, A., Noraini, M. N., Nik Azmah, N. Y., & Rosnidar, M. (2013). Aplikasi

persekitaran pengajaran maya (Frog VLE) dalam kalangan guru sains. Jurnal Pendidikan

Sains dan Matematik, 3(2), 63–76.

 

Nuanmeesri, S. (2014). A design of the infrastructure and computer network for distance

education, online learning via new media, e-learning and blended learning. International

Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, 8(9),

1579–1582.

 

Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be

done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314.

http://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231

 

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-

Hill.

 

Nurain, R., Balakrishnan, M., & Wan Ahmad Jaafar, W. Y. (2015). Attitude and motivation of

Malaysian secondary school students’ learning of ESL in a blended learning environment.

Dalam e-Proceeding of the Global Conference on Technology in Language Learning 2015.

http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4966.6646

 

Nur Syamimi, M. R., & Noraffandy, Y. (2010). Blended learning: Overcome the weaknesses of

e-learning and traditional approach. Edupress 2010. Diambil dari http://eprints.utm.my

/14929/

 

Nurul Farhana, J. (2013). Cabaran dalam mengimplementasi Virtual Learning Environment

(VLE) Frog dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran oleh guru di sekolah-sekolah di Malaysia.

(Tesis Sarjana). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.

 

O’Leary, R. (2002). Virtual learning environments. LTSN Economics and Manager of the

Learning Technology Support Service, University of Bristol. Diambil dari

http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190701/

 

Obiedat, R., Eddeen, L. N., Harfoushi, O., Koury, A., & Alassaf, N. (2014). Effect of blendedlearning

on academic achievement of students in the University of Jordan. International

Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(2), 37–45. http://doi.org/

10.3991/ijet.v9i2.3220

 

Ofsted. (2009). Virtual learning environments: An evaluation of their development in a sample of

educational settings. Alexandra House. The Office for Standards in Education. Diambil dari

www.ofsted.gov.uk

 

Oke, A. E., Ogunsami, D. R., & Ogunlana, S. (2012). Establishing a common ground for the use

of structural equation modelling for construction related research studies. Australasian

Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 12(3), 89–94. http://doi.org/

10.5130/ajceb.v12i3.2658

 

Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can “Blended Learning” be redeemed? E-Learning, 2(1), 17–

26. http://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17

 

Osborne, J. W. (2015). What is rotating in exploratory factor analysis? Practical Assessment,

Research & Evaluation, 20(2), 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1037/e558952014-001

 

Padilla-Melendez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013). Perceived

playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning

scenario. Computers and Education, 63, 306–317. http://doi.org/10.1016

/j.compedu.2012.12.014

 

Perez-Marin, D., & Pascual-Nieto, I. (2012). A case study on the use of blended learning to

encourage computer science students to study. Journal of Science Education Technology,

21, 74–82. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9283-6

 

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method

biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

 

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social

science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology,

63(1), 539–569. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

 

Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the cvi an acceptable indicator of content

validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health (Vol. 30).

 

Poon, J. (2012). Use of blended learning to enhance the student learning experience and

engagement in property education. Property Management, 30(2), 129–156. http://doi.org/

10.1108/02637471211213398

 

Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative

strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115.

http://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658

 

Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. Newyork Free Press (3rd Editio). New York: The

Free Press. http://doi.org/citeulike-article-id:126680

 

Rouhollah, K., Habibah, A. J., Wan Zah, W. A., & Shaffe, M. D. (2015). Presence and perceived

learning in different higher education blended learning environments. International Journal

of Mobile and Blended Learning, 7(3), 59–70. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2015070104

 

?ad, S. N. (2012). An attitude scale for smart board use in education: Validity and reliability

studies. Computers and Education, 58(3), 900–907. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.

2011.10.017

 

Saiful Afzan, B., Lazim, A., Ali, A., & Yusoff, H. (2014). Pemodelan penerimaan pelajar

terhadap persekitaran pembelajaran maya (VLE). Journal of Business and Social

Development, 2(2), 36–47.

 

Saltson, E., & Sharon, N. (2015). The mediating and moderating effects of motivation in the

relationship between perceived organizational support and employee job performance.

International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(7), 654–667. Diambil

dari http://ijecm.co.uk/

 

Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2005). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety,

and attitudes toward the Internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Educational

Technology and Society, 8(4), 205–219. http://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.8.4.205

 

Sankaran, S., & Norazlinda, S. (2017). Adoption of technology: school location as moderator.

The Social Sciences, 12(7), 1270–1274. Diambil dari http://docsdrive.com/pdfs

/medwelljournals/sscience/2017/1270-1274.pdf

 

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6th

ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson.

 

Sauro, J. (2010). Should you use 5 or 7 point scales? Diambil dari http://www.measuringusability

.com/blog/scale-points.php

 

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling

(3rd Ed.). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

 

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research methods for business (5th. ed.). West Sussex, UK:

John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

 

Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental

research. Research in Human Development, 6(2–3), 144–164. http://doi.org/10.1080/

15427600902911247

 

Seri Rahayu, H. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs and use of ICTs in malaysian smart schools: A case

study. Dalam Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011

(hal. 522–525). Diambil dari http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/downloads

/papers/Hamid-poster.pdf

 

Shamsuddin, H. (n.d.). Integrating ICT in teaching and learning: Countrty report: Malaysia.

Diambil dari http://woulibrary.wou.edu.my/weko/eed502/Shamsuddin_-_ICT_in_Malaysia

_Education.pdf

 

Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G., & Richard Francis. (2006). The undergraduate experience

of blended e-learning: A review of UK literature and practice. London: Higher Education

Academy. Diambil dari https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/sharpe_benfield

_roberts_francis_0.pdf

 

Shi, J., Mo, X., & Sun, Z. (2012). Content validity index in scale development. Journal of

Central South University (Medical Sciences), 37(2), 152–155. http://doi.org/

10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007

 

Shin, W. S., & Kang, M. (2015). The use of a mobile learning management system at an online

university and its effect on learning satisfaction and achievement. International Review of

Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 110–130.

 

Shivam, R., & Singh, S. (2015). Implementation of blended learning in classroom: A review

paper. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(11), 369–372.

 

Siang, J. J., & Santoso, H. B. (2015). Students ’ perspective of learning management system: An

empirical evidence of technology acceptance model in emerging countries. Journal of Arts,

Science & Commerce, 6(2), 1–14.

 

Siew-Eng, L., & Muuk, M. A. (2015). Blended learning in teaching secondary schools’ english:

A preparation for tertiary science education in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral

Sciences, 167(October), 293–300. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.677

 

Simelane, S., & Mji, A. (2014). Impact of technology-engagement teaching strategy with the aid

of clickers on student’s learning style. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136,

511–521. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.367

 

Simeonova, B., Bogolyubov, P., Blagov, E., & Kharabsheh, R. (2014). Cross-cultural validation

of UTAUT: The case of university VLEs in Jordan, Russia and the UK. The Electronic

Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 25–34. Diambil dari

http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/69681

 

Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6),

51–54. http://doi.org/10.1021/es2033229

 

Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. ASTD

State of the Industry Report, American Society for Training & Development (CENTRA),

(March), 1–11. Diambil dari http://facilitateadultlearning.pbworks.com/f

/blendedlearning.pdf

 

Siti Nazuar, S. (2014). Barriers influencing teacher ’s technology integration in their teaching

practice. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(23), 352–357.

 

Smith, J., Groves, M., Bowd, B., & Barber, A. (2012). Facilitating the development of study

skills through a blended learning approach. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(2),

108–117. http://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p108

 

Songkram, N. (2015). E-learning system in virtual learning environment to develop creative

thinking for learners in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174,

674–679. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.600

 

Stein, J., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Essentials for blended learning: A standards-based guide.

New York: Routledge.

 

Stratton, T. M. (2014). A case study of the integration of 21st century technology within the

place-based, expeditionary learning outward bound (ELOB) approach to education.

Instructional Technology Education Specialist Research Papers, (16), 1–59.

http://doi.org/http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/edu-papers/16 This

 

Swanson, R. A. (2007). Theory framework for applied disciplines: boundaries, contributing, core,

useful, novel, and irrelevant components. Human Resource Development Review, 6(3), 321–

339. http://doi.org/10.1177/1534484307303770

 

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson

Education. Inc.

 

Tan, P. J. B. (2013). Applying the UTAUT to understand factors affecting the use of english elearning

websites in Taiwan. SAGE Open, 3(4), 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1177/

2158244013503837

 

Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). Measuring the moderating effect of gender and age on elearning

acceptance in England: A structural equation modeling approach for an extended

technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(2), 163–

184. http://doi.org/10.2190/EC.51.2.b

 

Tay, H. Y. (2016). Investigating engagement in a blended learning course. Cogent Education,

3(1), 13. http://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1135772

 

Tayebinik, M., & Puteh, M. (2012). Blended learning or e-learning? International Magazine on

Advances in Computer Science and Telecommunications, 3(1), 103–110.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001

 

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of

competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.

http://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144

 

Teo, T., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2015). Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Does

gender matter ? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 235–251.

http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.v0i0.1672

 

Teo, T., Khlaisang, J., Thammetar, T., Ruangrit, N., Satiman, A., & Sunphakitjumnong, K.

(2014). A survey of pre-service teachers’ acceptance of technology in Thailand. Asia Pacific

Education Review, 15(4), 609–616. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9348-3

 

Teo, T., Luan, W. S. L., & Sing, C. C. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use

technology between Singaporean And Malaysian pre-service teachers: An application of the

technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Educational Technology and Society,

11(4), 265–280. Diambil dari http://www.ifets.info/download_pdf.php?j_id=41

&a_id=903

 

Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2016). The influence of teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning on

their technology acceptance. Interactive Learning Environments, 4820(March), 1–15.

http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844

 

Termit, K., & Noorma, H. (2015). Teachers’ readiness to utilize Frog VLE: A case study of a

Malaysian secondary school. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science

5(1), 20–29. http://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2015/11965

The JISC infoNet Service. (2006). Effective use of VLEs: Introduction to VLEs. Diambil dari

http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/InfoKits/effective-use-of-VLEs/intro-to-

VLEs/printable_version.pdf

 

The Oxford Group. (2013). Blended learning - current use, challenges and best practices.

Diambil dari http://www.kineo.com/elearning-reports/blended-learning-current-usechallenges-

and-best-practice.html

 

Thomas, T., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining

mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education

and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(3), 71–85. Diambil

dari http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=1687

 

Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts

and applications. Washington: American Psychological Association.

http://doi.org/10.1037/10694-000 Thompson,

 

Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. . (1991). Personal computing: Toward a

conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 124–143.

http://doi.org/10.2307/249443

 

Torrisi-steele, G. (2011). This thing called blended learning - a definition and planning approach.

Research and Development in Higher Education: Higher Education on the Edge, 34, 360–

371. Diambil dari http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/42960/

70212_1.pdf?sequence=1

 

Touray, A., & Salminen, A. (2013). The impact of moderating factors on behavioral intention

towards internet: A transnational perspective. International Journal of Computer and

Information Technology, 2(6), 1035–1041. Diambil dari www.ijcit.com

 

Tsai, C. W. (2015). Investigating the effects of web-mediated design thinking and co-regulated

learning on developing students’ computing skills in a blended course. Universal Access in

the Information Society, 14(2), 295–305. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0401-8

 

Turisiana, A. B., & Fauziah Saadah, A. H. (2014). Lecturers ’ perceptions of blended learning

readiness. Journal of Practices in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 50–63. Diambil

dari http://www.kedah.uitm.edu.my/CPLT/images/stories/v2n2/Article4.pdf

USCLibraries. (2016). Organizing your social sciences research paper: Theoretical framework.

Diambil dari http://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

 

Uysal, R., Satici, S. A., Satici, B., & Akin, A. (2014). Subjective vitality as mediator and

moderator of the relationship between life satisfaction and subjective happiness.

Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 489–497. http://doi.org

/10.12738/estp.2014.2.1828

 

VanDerLinden, K. (2014). Blended learning as transformational institutional learning. Dalam

New Directions for Higher Education (hal. 75–85). http://doi.org/10.1002/he

 

Vatanartiran, S., & Karadeniz, S. (2015). A needs analysis for technology integration plan:

Challenges and needs of teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(3), 206–220.

Diambil dari http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezpustaka.upsi.edu.my/ehost/pdfviewer/

pdfviewer?sid=02839cfb-7b1d-47cb-871a-361f9d93bc8f@sessionmgr4002&vid=1&hid

=4204

 

Vatuiu, T., & Udric?, M. (2013). Virtual learning environment as part of lifelong learning.

Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(4), 252–259. Diambil dari

http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/tojde/article/view/5000102268

 

Vaughan, N. (2014). Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessment

connection. Education Sciences, 4(4), 247–264. http://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4040247

 

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic

motivation, acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. Diambil dari

http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/

 

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance

model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

 

Venkatesh, V., & Morris, G. M. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for direction? Gender,

social influence and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour. MIS

Quarterly, 24(1), 115–139. http://doi.org/10.2307/3250981

 

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., & Ackerman, P. (2000). A longitudinal field investigation of gender

differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organizational

behavior and human decision processes, 83(1), 33–60. http://doi.org/

10.1006/obhd.2000.2896

 

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of

information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

http://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

 

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information

technology: Extending the unified theory. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. Diambil dari

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2002388

 

Virginia, W. (2014). Research methods: Triangulation. Evidence Based Library and Information

Practice, 9(1), 74–75. http://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.18438/B8WW3X

 

Wai, C. C., & Seng, E. L. K. (2014). Exploring the effectiveness and efficiency of blended

learning tools in a school of business. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,

123(2002), 470–476. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1446

 

Wan Fariza Alyati, W. Z. (2012). Alvin Toffler: Knowledge, technology and change in future

society. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 1(June), 54–61. Diambil dari

http://www.ukm.my/ijit/IJIT Vol 1 2012/7wan fariza.pdf

 

Wan Zah, W. A., Hajar, M. N., Azimi, H., & Hayati, A. (2009). The conditions and level of ICT

integration in Malaysian Smart Schools. International Journal of Education and

Development using ICT, 5(2), 21–31. Diambil dari http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu//

viewarticle.php?id=618&layout=html

 

Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: Using a

Complex Adaptive Systems Framework. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 380–

393. Diambil dari http://www.ifets.info/journals/18_2/28.pdf

 

Wayne, J. (2012). Effective learning - blended learning and virtual learning environment. Diambil

dari http://www.selfgrowth.com/articles/effective-learning-blended-learning-and-virtuallearning-

environment

 

Wei, W. (2009). A technology acceptance model: Mediate and moderate effect. Asia Pacific

Management Review, 14(4), 461–476. Diambil dari http://apmr.management.ncku.edu.tw/

comm/updown/DW0911102983.pdf

 

Wong, G. K. W. (2014). Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers of primary

mathematics: A pilot study in Hong Kong. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,

31(6), 713–735. Diambil dari http://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/viewFile/1890/1326

 

Wong, K. T., Rosma, O., Goh, P. S. C., & Mohd Khairezan, R. (2013). Understanding student

teachers ’ behavioural intention to use technology: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

validation and testing. International Journal of Instruction, 6(1), 89–105. Diambil dari

http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2013_1_6.pdf

 

Wong, K. T., Teo, T., & Goh, P. S. C. (2014). Development of the interactive whiteboard

acceptance scale (IWBAS): an Anitial study. Educational Technology and Society, 17(4),

268–277. Diambil dari http://www.ifets.info/journals/17_4/18.pdf

 

Wong, L., Tatnall, A., & Burgess, S. (2014). A framework for investigating blended learning

effectiveness. Education + Training, 56(2), 233–251. http://doi.org/10.1108/ET-04-2013-

0049

 

Wu, Y., Wen, M., Chen, C., & Hsu, I. (2016). An integrated BIM and cost estimating blended

learning model – acceptance differences between experts and novice. Eurasia Journal of

Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(5), 1347–1363. http://doi.org

/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1517a

 

Xin, H., Kempland, M., & Blankson, F. H. (2015). Adaptability and replicability of webfacilitated,

hybrid, and online learning in an undergraduate exercise psychology course.

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 19–30. Diambil dari

http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i1/1413.pdf

 

Yaghmale, F. (2003). Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education, 3(1),

25–27. Diambil dari http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/jme/article/download/870/769.

 

Yapici, ?. Ü., & Akbayin, H. (2012). The effect of blended learning model on high school

students’ biology achievement and on their attitudes towards the internet. The Turkish

Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 228–237. Diambil dari

http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ989031.pdf

 

Yeasmin, S., & Rahman, K. F. (2012). “Triangulation” research method as the tool of social

science research. Bup Journal, 1(1), 154–163. Diambil dari http://www.bup.edu.bd

/journal/154-163.pdf

 

Yeou, M. (2016). An investigation of students acceptance of moodle in a blended learning setting

using technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(3),

300–318. http://doi.org/10.1177/0047239515618464

 

Yu, Z., & Yuexiu, Z. (2015). Blended learning over two decades. International Journal of

Information and Communication Technology Education, 11(3), 1–19. http://doi.org/

10.4018/IJICTE.2015070101

 

Zaharah, H., Saedah, S., Ghazali, D., & Nur Hasbuna, M. S. (2015). Kajian model blended

learning dalam jurnal terpilih: Satu analisa kandungan. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran

Asia Pasifik, 3(1), 20–31. Diambil dari juku.um.edu.my

 

Zainudin, A. (2015). SEM Made Simple: A gentle approach to learning structural equation

modeling. Bangi: MPWS Rich Publication.

 

Zainudin, A., Asyraf, A., & Mustafa, M. (2016). The Likert scale analysis using parametric based

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 4(1), 13–

21. Diambil dari http://cmss.univnt.ro/wp-content/uploads/vol/split/vol_IV_issue_1/

CMSS_vol_IV_issue_1_art.002.pdf

 

Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Yan, W., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Users’ continuance intention of virtual

learning community services: The moderating role of usage experience. Interactive

Learning Environments, 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1172242

 

Zuraidah, Z. (2014). The effects of customer-brand relationship investments on customer

engagement. (Tesis Kedoktoran). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

 

Zuraidah, Z., Norjaya, M. Y., Nor Asiah, O., & Nik M. Hazrul, N. H. (2014). Determining the

key factors of customer–brand relationship investment dimensions: Insights from Malaysian

mobile phone users. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 13(4), 318–342.

http://doi.org/10.1080/15332667.2014.965649