Teachers

Tai, Mei Kin

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	LB1501 Primary Education
Main Author :	Tai, Mei Kin
Additional Authors :	Omar Abdull Kareem
Title :	Teachers

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :	Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

The purpose of the study was to examine the patterns of teacher attitudes toward change (TATC) in the National-type Chinese Primary Schools (NCPSs) in Perak, Malaysia. A total of 473 respondents completed the survey with useful data. The findings revealed that a) teachers in NCPSs achieved the level of Quite Good in TATC and in its three domains i.e. Cognitive, Behavioral and Affective; b) teachers in NCPSs possess cognitively based attitudes;c) in terms of quadrants, teachers in NCPSs were located in the quadrant of Acceptance of TATC; and d) there were 70.82%, 21.36%, 6.34%) and 1.48% of the teachers in NCPSs located in the quadrants of Acceptance, Embracing, Indifference and Resistance of TATC, respectively. These implied that there is a dire need for improvement of TATC in NCPSs in Perak. The study provides a preliminary insight into the emergence of patterns and typology of TATC in NCPSs, offering local practitioners and relevant parties another dimension of understanding, enhancing and preparing the teachers’ capacity for change. The study also serves as a reference as the findings leave the door open for further exploration on TATC in NCPSs as well as other types of primary schools across other states in Malaysia.

References

1. Aslan, M., Beycioglu, K., & Konan, N. (2008). Principals’ openness to change in Malatya, Turkey. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning. 12(8), 1-13.

2. Bardoel, E. A., & Sohal, A. S. (1999). The role of the culture audit in implementing quality improvement programs. The International Journal of Quality and Reliability, 16(3), 263-273.

3. Bouckenooghe, D. (2009). Change recipients' attitudes toward change: A review study. Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series, 14, 201-217.

4. Buckner, K. G., & McDowelle, J. O. (2000). Developing teacher leaders: Providing comparison between high- and mediocre- performing secondary schools in Malaysia. International Studies in Educational Administration, 41(1), 105-128.

5. Cunningham, C. (2006). The relationships among commitment to change, coping with change, and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 29-45.

6. Dunham, R. B., Grube, J. A., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Pierce, J. L. (1989). The development of an attitude toward change instrument. Unpublished discussion paper 124, Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. encouragement,opportunities and support. National Association for Secondary School

7. Farley, S. D., & Stasson, M. F. (2003). Relative influences of affect and cognition on behaviour: Are feelings or beliefs more related to blood donation intentions? Experimental Psychology, 50(1), 55-62.

8. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behaviour: The reasoned action Approach. New York: Psychology Press.

9. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

10. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

11. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1996). What’s worth fighting for in your school? New York: Teachers College Press.

12. Halverson, R., & Smith, A. (2009). How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 49-55.

13. Hayes, J. (2010). The theory and practice of change management (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

14. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of Structural Equation Modelling (3rd ed.).

15. Kotter, J. P. (1999). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

16. Lavine, H., Thomson, C. J., Zanna, M. P., & Borginda, E. (1998). On the primacy of affect in the determination of attitudes and behaviour: The moderating role of affective-cognitive ambivalence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 398-421.

17. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures. School effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(4), 249-280.Malaysia: Problems and challenges. The ISEAS working paper series, ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.

18. Millar, M. G., & Millar, K. U. (1990). Attitude change as a function of attitude type and argument type. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 217-228.

19. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Preliminary report - Executive summary: Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia. New York, NY: Guilford.

20. Nilakant, V., & Ramanarayan, S. (2006). Change management: Altering mindset in a global context. New Delhi: Response Books.

21. Omar, A. K., & Tai, M. K. (2018). Attitudes toward change: A comparison between senior assistants and teachers in Malaysian secondary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 249-265.

22. Omar, M. B., Rahman, A. B. A, Hamid, B. A. F.Z. (2018). The Association between Corporate Governance and Disclosure of Audit committee Characteristics: A Conceptual Model for the Saudi Listed Companies, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 8 (3): 325-335.

23. Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680-693.

24. Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783-794. Principal Bulletin.

25. Rafedzi, E. R. K., Zainal, N. K., Yu, H., & Kamal, J. I. A. (2018). Barriers to Access the Information by Male Juvenile Delinquents in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(3), 86–95.

26. Raman , S. R., & Tan , Y. S. (2015). The dev elopment of Chinese educ at ion in

27. Sarros, J. C., Cooper, K. B., & Santora, C. J. (2011). Leadership vision, organizational culture, and support for innovation in not-for-profit and for profit organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(3), 291-309.

28. Seijts, G. H., & Roberts, M. (2011).The impact of employee perception on change in a municipal government. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32(2), 190-213.

29. Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65-73.

30. Tai, M. K., & Omar, A. K. (2017a). An exploration of the relationship between

31. Tai, M. K., & Omar, A. K. (2014a). Individual and school-level determinants of teacher attitudes toward change: A study in Malaysian high performing secondary school. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 27(1), 37-58.

32. Tai, M. K., & Omar, A. K. (2014b).Teachers attitudes toward change: A study in Malaysian high performing secondary school. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 21(3), 543-549.

33. T a i , M . K . , & O m a r , A . K . ( 2 0 1 6 ) . T e a c h e r a t ti t u d e s t o w a r d C h a n g e : A

34. Tai, M. K., & Omar, A. K. (2017b). Measuring teacher attitudes toward change: An empirical validation. International Journal of Management in Education, 11(4), 437-469. doi: 10.1504/IJMIE.2017.10005987

35. Tai, M. K., Omar, A. K., Sahari, M. N., & Khuan, W. B. (2015). Teacher change beliefs: Validating a scale with structural equation modelling. School Leadership and Management, 35(3), 266-299.

36. Tai, M. K., Omar, A. K., Sahari, M. N., & Khuan, W. B. (2017). Principal change leadership competencies and teacher attitudes toward change: The mediating effects of teacher change beliefs. International Journal of Leadership in Education. Advance online publication. DOI:10.1080/13603124.2016.1272719

37. teacher change beliefs and teacher attitudes toward change. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6(2), 67-87.

38. Trader-Leigh, W. (2001). Resistance to organizational change: The role of cognitive and affective processes. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 22(8), 372-82.

39. Underwood, C. (2002). Belief and attitude change in the context of human development, in Sustainable Human Development, from Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Eolss Publishers, Oxford ,UK, http://www.eolss.net

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page