Mathematics procedural knowledge of form four daily school students in district of Petaling Utama, Selangor

Mazlini Adnan

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education
Main Author :	Mazlini Adnan
Additional Authors :	Azhar Ahmad Mohd Hairi Yusof Nur Farah Atirah Baharudin
Title :	Mathematics procedural knowledge of form four daily school students in district of Petaling Utama, Selangor

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

This study aimed to examine the level of students' procedural knowledge on mathematics. In addition, the difference between conceptual knowledge based on gender and program. Measurement of knowledge is based on the Procedural Knowledge Test (PKT). A total of 350 respondents were selected from four daily secondary schools in Petaling Utama, Selangor as a sample of the study. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis to find out the level of variables measured. In order to identify the main effects and interactions between gender and program variables, inference analysis is a two-way ANOVA test performed for procedural knowledge dimension. ANOVA test showed no interaction effects between gender for procedural knowledge of mathematics (p 0.05). In conclusion, mathematical knowledge is very important at the upper secondary level as a high level of mathematical thinking is required to ensure excellent in mathematical achievement. This is effectively as a long time learning system and methods as well as the imitation approach and dependent on the examinations orientation has long been a measure of student achievement. The implication of this study is that basic procedural knowledge of students' mathematics needs to be enhanced to realize Malaysia's aspiration to be in the top third place in international assessments such as TIMSS and PISA.

References

[1] Chua Yan Piaw. (2012). Kaedah statistik penyelidikan: ujian regrsi, analisis faktor dan analisis SEM (Edisi Kedua). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill Education.

[2] Effandi Zakaria, Norazah Mohd Nordin & Sabri Ahmad. (2007). Trend pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik. Utusan Publications dan Distributors Sdn Bhd: Kajang

[3] Faridah Salleh. (2004). Keupayaan menyelesaikan masalah matematik bukan rutin di kalangan pelajar cemerlang akademik. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

[4] Hiebert, E. H. (2013). Supporting students’ movement up the staircase of text complexity. The Reading Teacher, 66, 459-468.

[5] Ismail Salleh. (2008). Pendekatan Pengajaran Algebra Sekolah Menengah: Konseptual atau Prosedural. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

[6] Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. In Educational and Psychological Measurement (Vol. 38, pp. 607-610).

[7] Mahayon Abas.(2005). Kefahaman Ungkapan Algebra Pelajar Tingkatan Empat. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

[8] Nor Hasnida Che Md Ghazali & Nik Noralhuda Nik Mohamed. (2010). Pemahaman Konseptual dan Prosedural Matematik Pelajar. Prosiding Seminar bersama antara UKM-UI (SEBUMI).

[9] Nik Noralhuda Nik Mohamed. (2011). Pengetahuan konseptual, prosedural dan kesedaran metokognitif dalam kelas matematik sekolah menengah. (Sarjana Pendidikan), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.

[10] Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 346-362.

[11] Skemp, R. R. (1971). The Psychology of Learning Mathematics. Middlesex, UK: Penguin.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page