UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :Q Science
Main Author :Hamidah Mat
Title :Kesan modul jom bijak sains terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dan kemahiran proses sains bersepadu murid tahun 5
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :2019
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Tujuan  kajian  ini  adalah  untuk  menentukan  kesan ns  terhadap Kemahiran   Proses   Sains   Bersepadu   dan   Kemahiran   Berfikir   Aras   Tinggi.    Kajian   ini menggunakan rekabentuk kuasi-eksperimen menggunakan ujian pra dan pasca. Pembinaan  modul   ini   adalah   berasaskan   model   ADDIE   yang   terdiri   daripada   fasa   analisis,    fasa rekebentuk,  fasa  perlaksanaan,  fasa  penilaian  dan  fasa  perlaksanaan.   Fasa   penilaian  melibatkan  lima  orang  pakar  dalam  bidang  sains  untuk  mengesahkan  kandungan  dan  kebolehgunaan modul. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada 33 orang pelajar kumpulan rawatan dan 33  orang  pelajar  kumpulan  kawalan  yang  dipilih  secara  rawak  kluster.  Instrumen  yang  digunakan  ialah  ujian  pra,  ujian  pasca  dan  ujian  kemahiran  proses  sains  bersepadu.   Hasil kajian  menunjukkan  bahawa  terdapat  peningkatan  pencapaian  pada  kedua-dua  kumpulan  rawatan  dan  kawalan.  Namun,  kumpulan  rawatan  menunjukkan  peningkatan  pencapaian yang  lebih   tinggi  secara  signifikan  berbanding  kumpulan  kawalan.  Dapatan  kajian  juga menunjukkan  terdapat peningkatan terhadap tahap kemahiran proses sains bersepadu skor ujian  pasca  kumpulan   rawatan  (min=33.48,  SP=7.843)  dan  skor  ujian  kumpulan  kawalan (min=17.76,  SP=7.718)     serta  kemahiran  berfikir  aras  tinggi  pada  kedua-dua  kumpulan rawatan  (min=70.18,  SP=10.86)   dan  kawalan  (min=64.91,  SP=9.19)  dengan  kumpulan rawatan menunjukkan peningkatan pencapaian  yang lebih tinggi secara signifikan berbanding kumpulan  kawalan.  Berdasarkan  keputusan  ujian-t   sampel  tidak  bersandar  bagi  kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi mengaplikasi terdapat perbezaan yang  signifikan [t(66), p

References

A.Rahman Haron, Zamri Mahamod, Mohamed Amin Embi, Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik

Yusof, Sharifah Nor Puteh & Jamaludin Badusah. (2012). Teknik “salak” dalam menjana idea membina 

ayat dengan cepat dan efektif. Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(2), 84–

93. Retrieved from manlaoshi@gmail.com

 

Abdul Jamir,  M.  S.,  Ab. Halim,  T.,  &A’dawiyah,  I.  (2012).  Pembelajaran  Aktif  dalam 

Pengajaran  dan  Pembelajaran  Berkesan  Pendidikan  Islam.  Jurnal  IPG  Kampus Pendidikan Islam, 

1–22.

 

Abdul   Rasid,   J.   H.   I.   (2013).   Pelaksanaan   pembelajaran   menyeronokkan   dalam 

pengajaran dan pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 3, 49–63.

 

Ahmad,   J.,  Noah,   S.   M.,   Kadir,   R.  A.,  Ahmad,   H.,   &Pendidikan,  F.   P.   (2005). 

Keberkesanan Modul Program Maju Diri ke atas Motivasi Pencapaian di Kalangan Pelajar      Sekolah   

   Menengah      di      Negeri      Selangor.      Retrieved      from 

http://www.ipbl.edu.my/portal/penyelidikan/seminarpapers/2005/sidekUPM.pdf

 

Amabile, T. M. (1996).Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.

 

Amabile, T.M et. al (1999). Breakthrough Thinking. Boston: Harvard Business Scholl Press

Ash,  K.  (2011).  Programming  Digital  Fun  Into  Science  Education.  Education  Week, Digital 

Directions, 4, 18–19.

 

Ausubel, D. P. (1965). Perception versus cognition in meaningful verbal learning. Journal of        

           General                   Psychology                   73(2),                   185–187. 

http://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1965.9710712

 

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Facilitation Meaningful Verbal Learning in the Classroom. The Arithmetic 

Teacher, 15(2), 126–132. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461527709529171

 

Aziz  &  Lin,  H.  L.  (2010).  Hubungan  Sikap  Terhadap  Mata  Pelajaran  Sains  Dengan 

Penguasaan   Konsep   Asas   Sains   Pelajar   Tingkatan   Dua.   Universiti   Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Aziz  Nordin  &  Lin,  L.  H.  (2011a).  Hubungan  SikapTerhadap  Mata  Pelajaran  Sains Dengan  

Penguasaan  Konsep  Asas  Sains  Pelajar  Tingkatan  Dua.  Of  Science  & Mathematics EducationalJ, 

2, 89–101.

 

Aziz  Nordin  &  Lin,  L.  H.  (2011b).  Hubungan  Sikap  Terhadap  Mata  Pelajaran  Sains Dengan 

Penguasaan Konsep Asas Sains Pelajar Tingkatan Dua. Journal of Science

& Mathematics Educational, 2, 89–101.

 

Babadogan,  C.,  &  Ünal,  F.  (2011).  Examples  of  instructional  design  for  social  studies

according  to  meaningful  learning  and  information  processing  theories.  Procedia  - Social    

         and             Behavioral             Sciences,             15,             2155–2158. 

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.070

 

Barak,   M.,   &Dori,   Y.   J.   (2009).   Enhancing   higher   order   thinking   skills   among 

inservicescience  teachers  via  embedded  assessment.  Journal  of  Science  Teacher Education, 

20(5), 459–474. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9141-z

 

Bloom,  B.  (1957).  Learning  domains  or  Bloom’s  taxonomy.  Retrieved  November,  6, 2007.

 

Bloom, B. S., Englehard, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., Krathwohl, D. R., & Committee of College 

and University Examiners. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of 

educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York, 16, 207. 

http://doi.org/10.1300/J104v03n01_03

 

Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2003). Chopsticks and counting chips: Do play and foundational skills 

need to competefor the teacher’s attention in an early childhood classroom?Young Children, 58, 

10-17.

 

Brandoni,  C.,  & Anderson,  O.  R.  (2009).  A  New Neurocognitive  Model  for  Assessing 

Divergent  Thinking:  Applicability,  Evidence  of  Reliability,  and  Implications  for 

Educational       Theory       and       Practice.       Creativity       Research       Journal. 

http://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903297352

 

Bruce,  T.  (2001).  Learning  through  play:  Babies,  toddlers  and  the  foundation  years.

London: Hodder & Stoughton

 

Bruner, J. S. (1960). The Process of Education. In The Process of Education (pp. 12–13). 

http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

 

Buntat, Y., Sharliana, N., Nasir, M., & Pendidikan, F. (2011). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mendorong 

Kreativiti Di Kalangan. Journal Educational Psychology and Counseling, 2, 175–208.

 

Çakir,  N.  K.,  &  Sarikaya,  M.  (2010).  An  evaluation  of  science  process  skills  of  the 

Science Teaching majors. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 9, pp. 1592–1596). 

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.370

 

Çepni,  S.,  &Kele?,  E.  (2006).  Turkish  students’  conceptions  about  the  simple  electric 

circuits.  International Journal  of  Science and Mathematics  Education,  4,  269–291. 

http://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-9001-z

 

Chowning,  J.  T.,  Griswold,  J.  C.,  Kovarik,  D.  N.,  &  Collins,  L.   J.  (2012).  Fostering 

critical  thinking,  reasoning,  and  argumentation  skills  through  bioethics  education. PLoS 

ONE, 7(5). http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036791

 

Chua, Y. P. (2012). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan buku 2: Asas statistik penyelidikan

(Edisi kedua). KualaLumpur: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.

 

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Statistical Power

Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. http://doi.org/10.1234/12345678

 

Coil, D., Wenderoth, M. P., Cunningham, M., & Dirks, C. (2010). Teaching the process

of science: Faculty perceptions and an effective methodology. CBE Life Sciences

Education, 9(4), 524–535. http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005

 

Collins, A. (2013). Neuroscience meets music education: Exploring the implications of

neural processing models on music education practice. International Journal of

Music Education, 31(2), 217–231. http://doi.org/10.1177/0255761413483081

 

Dani Asmadi Ibrahim, K. O. (2011). Kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pengajaran tajuk

model atom dan pencapaian objektif kursus kimia. Prosiding Seminar Majlis

Dekan?dekan Pendidikan IPTA2011, 105–122.

 

David, C. @ L., &Ambotang, A. S. (2014). Profesionalisme Guru Novis dalam

Pengurusan Pengetahuan, Kesediaan Mengajar dan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi

(KBAT) Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pengajaran di Sekolah. Seminar Kebangsaan

Integriti Keluarga 2014, 1–15. Retrieved from

http://www.ums.edu.my/fpp/images/download/proseding_skik2014/Caroline__loren

a_david.pdf

 

DeCarvalho, R. J. (1991). The humanistic paradigm in education. The Humanistic

Psychologist, 19(l), 88–104. http://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.1991.9986754

 

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to

the educative process. Book. http://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000

 

DeWitt, D. (2010). Development of collaborative mLearning module on nutrition for Form

Two students.

Tesis PhD. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.

 

Dick, W. (1996). The dick and carey model: Will it survive the decade? Educational

Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 55–63.

http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300425

Dickson, P. P., Jln, K. M., Si, P., & Port, R. (2011). Hubungan antara minat , sikap

dengan pencapaian pelajar dalam kursus CC301 – quantity measurement.

 

Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. United

Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

 

Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2010). Assessing Classroom Learning. Educational

Psychology: Windows on Classrooms, 430–469.

 

Fata-Hartley, C. (2011). Resisting rote: The importance of active learning for all course

learning objectives. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(3), 36–39.

 

Fatin Aliah Phang, Mohd Salleh Abu, Mohammad Bilal Ali, &Salmiza Salleh. (2012a).

Faktor penyumbang kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran sains: satu

analisis sorotan tesis. Medc2012, 17. http://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n3.2

 

Fatin Aliah Phang, MohdSalleh Abu, Mohammad Bilal Ali, &Salmiza Salleh. (2012b).

Faktor penyumbang kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran sains: satu

analisis sorotan tesis. MEDC2012, 17.

 

Fazliza Che Amat, Zurida Ismail, Nooraida Yakob, & Abdul Majeed Ahmad. (2011).

Perlaksanaan Sains KSSR Tahun Satu: Satu Tinjauan Awal. Seminar Kebangsaan

Majlis Dekan IPTA 2012, 1–8.

 

Folashade, A., & Akinbobola, A. O. (2009). Constructivist Problem-Based Learning

Technique and the Academic Achievement of Physics Students with Low

Ability Level in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Eurasian J. Phys. Chem. Educ. 1(1),

45-51. Retrieved September 13, 2010 from

http://eurasianjournals.com/index.php/ejpce/article/viewFile/34/59

 

Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom ’ s Taxonomy : Original and revised. Emerging Perspectives

on Learning, Teaching, and Technology, 12. Retrieved from

http://www4.edumoodle.at/gwk/pluginfile.php/109/mod_resource/content/5/forehan

d_bloomschetaxonomie02.pdf

 

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H.,

&Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in

science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of

Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 8410–5.

http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

 

Fullan, M. & Promfret, A. (1977) Research on Curriculum and Instruction

Implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), pp. 335 - 397.

 

Gagné, R. M. (1965). The Learning of Concepts. The School Review, 75, 187-196.

 

George. D., & Mallery. M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Aimple Guide

and Reference. Boston : Pearson

 

Griffin, M. (2011). Developing Deliberative Minds- Piaget , Vygotsky and the

Deliberative Democratic Citizen. Journal of Public Deliberation, 7(1), 1–28.

 

Grove, N. P., & Lowery Bretz, S. (2012). A continuum of learning: from rote

memorization to meaningful learning in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education

Research and Practice, 13(3), 201. http://doi.org/10.1039/c1rp90069b

 

Hamidah Maidinsah & Merza Abbas. (2001). Pemikiran saintifik dan kaitannya

dengan matematik dikalangan pelajar IPT. Simposium Kebangsaan Sains dan

Matematik ke-9, UKM, 2001

 

Hamidah Maidinsah. (2004). Kesan kaedah pengajaran metakognisi-inkuiri terhadap

prestasi dalam matematik dan penaakulan saintifik di kalangan pelajar diploma.

Tesis

Ph.D (Tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Sains Malaysia.

 

Hammond, S. I. (2014). Children’s early helping in action: Piagetian developmental

theory and early prosocial behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 759.

http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00759

 

Hazrulrizawati Bt Abd Hamid.(2007). Perbandingan Tahap Penguasaan KemahiranProses

Sains Dan Cara Penglibatan PelajarDalam Kaedah Amali Tradisional Dengan

Kaedah Makmal Mikro Komputer.Sarjana, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

 

Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. Bin, Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. Bin, Mohaffyza,

M., &Mohamad, B. (2011). The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills

among Technical Education Students. International Journal of Social Science and

Humanity, 1, 121–125.

 

Honey, M. A., & Hilton, M. (2011). Learning Science Through Computer Games and

Simulations. Social Sciences (Vol. 42).

 

Hsu, J. T.-S. 1997. Value, expectancy, metacognition, resource management, and

academic achievement: A structural model of self-regulated learning in a distance

education context. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Southern California, California.

 

Huitt, W. (2001 1988). Humanism and open education [Electronic

Version]. Educational Psychology Interaction. Retrieved March 28, 2011. From

http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/affsys/humed.html

 

International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achevement, IEA. (2015).

TIMSS 2015 INTERNATIONAL RESULTS IN SCIENCE. New directions for

youth development (Vol. 2015). Retrieved from

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3295935&tool=pmcentr

ez&rendertype=abstract

 

Ikhsan Othman, &RohizaniYaakub. (2010). Aplikasi Teori Kecerdasan Pelbagai Dalam

Pelaksanaan Kurikulum. Asia Pasific Journal of Educators and Education, 25, 21–

32.

 

Jamaludin Ramli, &Naswa Jusoh. (2011). Hubungan antara sikap, konsep kendiri,

motivasi dan lokus kawalan dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar tingkatan tiga

kelas aliran agama di sekolah menengah daerah Kulaijaya. Journal of Educational

Psychology & Counseling, 3(September), 18–35.

 

Jamian, S. O. R. (2011). STANDARD SEKOLAH RENDAH, 292–312.

 

Kamii, C., & Yasuhiko, K. (2006). Play and mathematics at ages one to ten. In Fromberg,

D. P. & D. Bergen (Eds.),Play from Birth to Twelve, (2nd ed.), pp. 187–198. New

York: Taylor and Francis Group.Lee dan Ginsburg (2009)

 

Kamisah Osman, Zanaton Haji Iksan, & Lilia Halim. (2007). Sikap terhadap Sains dan

Sikap Saintifik di kalangan Pelajar Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan, 32, 39–60.

 

Karamustafao?lu, S. (2011). Improving the Science Process Skills Ability of Science

Student Teachers Using I Diagrams. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry

Education, 3, 26–38.

 

Karpicke, J. D. (2012). Retrieval-Based Learning: Active Retrieval Promotes Meaningful

Learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 157–163.

http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412443552

 

Kato, K. (2013). Quasi-Bayesian analysis of nonparametric instrumental variables

models. The Annals of Statistics, 41(5), 2359–2390. http://doi.org/10.1214/13-

AOS1150

 

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2013). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi. Kuala

Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.

 

Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (3rd ed.). Design and

analysis: A researcher’s handbook (3rd ed.).

 

Ketelhut, D. J., Nelson, B. C., Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2010). A multi-user virtual

environment for building and assessing higher order inquiry skills in science. British

Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 56–68. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-

8535.2009.01036.x

 

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom ’ s Taxonomy : An Overview. Theory

Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104

 

Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening

the Black Box of Team-Level Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4),

285–294. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_06

 

Leahey, T. H. (2000). Control: A history of behavioural psychology. The Journal of

American History, 87(2), 686-687.

 

Lee, L.H (1997). Goal orientation, goal Setting, and achievement performance in college

students: An integrated model of achievement motivation in school settings.

 

Lourenço, O. (2012a). Piaget and Vygotsky: Many resemblances, and a crucial

difference. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(3), 281–295.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.006

 

Lourenço, O. (2012b). Piaget and Vygotsky: Many resemblances, and a crucial

difference. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(3), 281–295.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.006

 

MacArthur, V., &Conlan, O. (2010). Modeling higher-order cognitive skills in

technology enhanced distance learning. In ICDLE 2010 - 2010 4th International

Conference on Distance Learning and Education, Proceedings (pp. 15–19).

http://doi.org/10.1109/ICDLE.2010.5606049

 

Madhuri, G. V, Kantamreddi, V. S. S. N., &Goteti, L. N. S. P. (2012). Promoting higher

order thinking skills using inquiry-based learning. European Journal of Engineering

Education, 37(2), 117–123. http://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.661701

 

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote Versus Meaningful Learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4),

226–232. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4

 

McGregor, A. (2007). Fifty Key Thinkers on Development. Singapore Journal of

Tropical Geography (Vol. 28). http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2007.00298.x

 

Michael, A. S., Veeravagu, J., Muthusamy, C., Marimuthu, R., &Subrayan, A. (2010).

Using Bloom ’ s Taxonomy to Gauge Students ’ Reading Comprehension

Performance. CANADIAN SOCIAL SCIENCE, 6, 205–212.

 

Nazir M. Z. (2010). Problem-Based Learning On Students’ Critical Thinking Skills In

Teaching Business Education In Malaysia: A Literature Review. American Journal

of Business Education, 3, 19–32. Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com/docview/516344956?accountid=27240 LA - English

 

Mokhtar, M. Z., Tarmizi, M. A. A., Tarmizi, R. A., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2010).

Problem-based learning in calculus course: Perception, engagement and

performance. Latest Trends on Engineering Education, 21-25. Retreived March

10, 2011, from

http://www.wseas.us/elibrary/conferences/2010/Corfu/EDUCATION/EDUCATION

-01.pdf

 

Müller, U., Burman, J. T., & Hutchison, S. M. (2013). The developmental psychology of

Jean Piaget: A quinquagenary retrospective. Journal of Applied Developmental

Psychology, 34(1), 52–55. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.10.001

 

Murchison, C. A., Adler, A., & American Psychological Association. (1930).

Psychologies of 1930. The International University Series in Psychology.

 

Murphy, C., Bianchi, L., McCullagh, J., & Kerr, K. (2013). Scaling up higher order

thinking skills and personal capabilities in primary science: Theory-into-policy-intopractice.

Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 173–188.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.005

 

Murphy, C., Murphy, C., &Kilfeather, P. (2010). Children Making Sense of Science.

Research in Science Education, 41(2), 283–298. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-

9165-6 Business Education, 3(6).

 

Najib Ghafar, M., & Rauf Ibrahim, A. (2011). Penilaian Hubungan Tahap Penguasaan

Konsepsi Sains Dengan Tahap Kemahiran Proses Sains Guru Peringkat Menengah

Rendah. Journal of Science and Mathematics Educational, 3, 1–19.

 

Norakma, M. D., Abdul Razak, A., & NoriaMunirah, Y. (2015). Pembelajaran

Berteraskan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KBAT) Di Dalam Pengajaran Dan

Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Sejarah. 7th International Seminar on Regional

Education, 1, 352–360.

 

Nordin, A., & Ling, L. H. (2011). Hubungan Sikap Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Sains

Dengan Penguasaan Konsep Asas Sains Pelajar Tingkatan Dua. Of Science &

Mathematics EducationalJ, 2, 89–101.

 

Norhapizah, M. B., Ab. Halim, T., & Norazah, M. N. (2016). Penerimaan Modul

Pembelajaran Digital Berasaskan Strategi Blended Learning (e-CITAC) Dalam

Kursus TITAS. The Online Journal of Islamic Education, 4(1–16), 1–16. Retrieved

from http://e-journal.um.edu.my/filebank/published_article/9698/(1-16)Penerimaan

Modul Pembelajaran

Digital.pdf%5Cnhttp://ojie.um.edu.my/filebank/published_article/9698/(1-

16)Penerimaan Modul Pembelajaran Digital.pdf

 

Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change

in Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment of

Learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032

 

Novak, J. D. (2013). MEANINGFUL LEARNING IS THE FOUNDATION FOR

CREATIVITY *, 27–38.

 

Nur Farhanah Bt Mohd Amin. (2011). Keberkesanan Kaedah Nyanyian Dalam

Meningkatkan Ingatan Murid Tahun 5 Bagi Tajuk ‘Kitaran Air’. Tesis Ijazah

Sarjana Muda Perguruan (dengan Kepujian) yang belum diterbitkan, Kuala

Terengganu, Terengganu: Institut Pendidikan Guru Dato’ Razali Ismail.

 

NurHanis Mohd Hatta. (2012). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Kaedah Bermain Dalam

Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Asuhan Tilawah al-Quran Tahun 4. In Seminar

Penyelidikan Tindakan IPG (pp. 34–44).

 

Nutbrown, C. (1994). Threads of thinking: Young children learning and the role of early

education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

 

Othman, A., Talib, O., & Ibrahim, D. A. (2015). Analisis Dokumen Silibus Kimia

Organik Matrikulasi Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Kurikulum &

Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, Bil 3(3), 20–31.

 

Owocki, G. (1991). Literacy through play. Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.

 

Padilla, M. J., Okey, J. R., & Garrard, K. (1984). The effects of instruction on integrated

science process skill achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(3),

277–287. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210305

 

Piaget, J. (1953). The origins of intelligence in children. Journal of Consulting

Psychology, 17(6), 467–467. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0051916

 

Piaget, J. (1971). Psychology and epistemology. Orion Press book.

 

Piaget, J. (1976). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York: Penguin

Books.

 

Piaget, J. (2006). Piaget’s theory. In Childhood cognitive development: The essential

redings (pp. 33–47). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46323-5_2

 

Pintrich, P.R & DeGroot, E.V (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components

of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1): 33-40.

 

Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. 1996. Motivation In Education: Theory, Research And

Applications. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F.,

Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. 1991. A Manual For The Use Of The Motivated

Strategies For Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Michigan: University of Michigan.

 

Prosser, M., &Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: the experience

in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 30). Retrieved

from http://books.google.com/books?id=aWydAAAAMAAJ&pgis=1

Quickly, S. (2012). Teknik “salak” dalammenjana idea membina ayat dengan cepat dan

efektif, 2, 84–93.

 

Rambli, D. R. A., Matcha, W., &Sulaiman, S. (2013). Fun learning with AR alphabet

book for preschool children. In Procedia Computer Science (Vol. 25, pp. 211–219).

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.026

 

Rasid Jamian, A., Nadiah Razali, Nurul, & Othman, Shamsudin. (2016). Applications of

Fun Learning Technique in Improving Achievement in Malay Language Essay.

Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 41(1), 39–45.

 

Rauf, R. A. A., Rasul, M. S., Mansor, A. N., Othman, Z., & Lyndon, N. (2013).

Inculcation of science process skills in a science classroom. Asian Social Science,

9(8), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n8p47

 

Robiatul A’dawiah, J., & Halimah, Z. B. (2011). Pembangunan Perisian Cerita Animasi

Interaktif untuk Pendidikan Sains. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Malaysia, 1, 5–18.

 

Roden, I., Kreutz, G., &Bongard, S. (2012). Effects of a school-based instrumental music

program on verbal and visual memory in primary school children: A longitudinal

study. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(DEC). http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00572

 

Rotfeld, H. H. (2007). Theory, data, interpretations, and more theory. The Journal of

Consumer Affairs, 41(2), 376-380.

 

Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012a). The learning effects of

computer simulations in science education. Computers and Education, 58, 136–153.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017

 

Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012b). The learning effects of

computer simulations in science education. Computers and Education, 58(1), 136–

153.

 

Saedah Siraj, Norlidah Alias, Dorothy DeWitt, & Zaharah Hussin. (2013). Design and

developmentalresearch: Emergent trends in educational research. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson

Malaysia.

 

2.1.2 Salasiah Z. et a l(2016). Pembinaan dan penentusahan instrumen ujian

kemahiran proses

 

2.1.2 sains bersepadu sekolah rendah.(Tesis Sarjana tidak diterbitkan).

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak.

 

Salawati, S., & Fatin, A. P. A. (2011). Penguasaan Kemahiran Proses Sains Bersepadu

Dalam Ujian Amali Dan Ujian Bertulis Fizik Tingkatan 4. Journal of Edupres,

1(September), 301–305.

 

Saul, C., &Wuttke, H.-D. (2011a). Personalized assessment of higher-order thinking

skills. In CSEDU 2011 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on

Computer Supported Education (Vol. 2, pp. 425–430). Retrieved from

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-

80053016550&partnerID=40&md5=513388d2683c3e7c2ee01b3b855059ce

 

Saul, C., &Wuttke, H.-D. (2011b). Personalized assessment of higher-order thinking

skills. In CSEDU 2011 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on

Computer Supported Education (Vol. 2, pp. 425–430).

 

Sawyers, J. K. & Rogers, C. S. (1998). Helping children develop through play: A

practical

guide for parents, caregivers and teachers. Washington, DC: National Association

for the Education of Young Children.

 

Schneider, J. (2010). Was Bloom ’ s Taxonomy Pointed in the Wrong Direction ? Phi

Delta Kappan, (December 2009), 56–61.

 

Selcuk, G. S. (2010). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’

achievement, approaches and attitudes towards learning physics. International

Journal of the Physical Sciences, 5(6), 711-723. Retrieved May 2, 2011 from

http://www.academicjournals.org/ijps/PDF/pdf2010/Jun/Sel%C3%A7uk.pdf

 

Shaffe Mohd Daud, Ramli Basri, Roselan Baki, Sahandri Ghani Hamzah, & Mokhtar

Nawawi. (2011). Pengaruh Amalan Jenaka Terhadap Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran

Murid. Asia Pasific Journal of Educators and Education, 26(1), 125–144.

 

Shahali, E. H. M., & Halim, L. (2010a). Development and validation of a test of

integrated science process skills. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol.

9, pp. 142–146). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.127

 

SharifahNorPuteh, & Ali, A. (2011).

Pendekatanbermaindalampengajaranbahasadanliterasi bagi pendidikanprasekolah.

JurnalPendidikanBahasaMelayu 1, 1, 1–15.

 

Sharifah Nor Puteh, Nor AdibahGhazali, MohdMahzanTamyis, A. A. Keprihatinan Guru

BahasaMelayuDalamMelaksanakanKemahiranBerfikirSecaraKritis Dan Kreatif, 2

JurnalPendidikanBahasaMelayu 19–31 (2012).

 

Skinner, B. F. (1965). Review lecture: The technology of teaching. The Royal Society of

London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 162(969), 427–443.

http://doi.org/10.1145/585882.585885

 

Smith, L. (2010). Piaget: Recent work. In International Encyclopedia of Education (pp.

218–224). http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00485-1

 

Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation,

innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193.

http://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4

 

Syed Anwar Aly & Merza Abbas. (2000). Penyerapan kemahiran saintifik dalam

proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran kimia di sekolah menengah. Simposium

Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik UiTM, Shah Alam, pada 3 November 2000.

 

Tan Ming Tang, & Chin TeoiPeng. (2001). SatuTinjauanAwalKonsepsiKemahiran

Proses Sains Di Kalangan Guru Sains PKPG 14 Minggu di

MaktabPerguruanBatuLintang. MaktabPerguruanBatuLintang. Retrieved from

http://www.ipbl.edu.my/portal/penyelidikan/2001/2001_9_tanmt.pdf

 

MuhyddinYassin. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.

PetikanUcapan Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin Ketika Membentangkan Laporan Awal

Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 Pada 13/9/2012, 1–12.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

 

Tek, O. E., &Mohd Al-JunaidiMohamad. (2013). Pembinaan dan penentusahan

instrument kemahiran proses sains untuk sekolah menengah. Jurnal Teknologi

(Sciences and Engineering), 66(1), 7–20. http://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v66.1748

 

TIMSS (2015)

http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/encyclopedia/countries/malaysia/the-sciencecurriculum-

in-primary-and-lower-secondary-grades/

 

Ultanir, E. (2012). An Epistemological Glance at the Constructivist Approach:

Constructivist Learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of

Instruction, 5(2), 195 – 212.

 

Van Zile-Tamsen, C.V (1998). Examining metacognitive self-regulation within the context of

daily academic tasks. Doctoral Dissertation, The State University of New York, 1998.

Dissertation Abstracts International 44 (11A): 3320.

 

Vighnarajah, Wong Su Luan & Kamariah Abu Bakar. (2008). The shift in the role of

teachers

in the learning process. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7 (2).

 

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Mind and

Society. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79572-3

 

Webb, J. L. (2007). Pragmatisms (Plural) part I: Classical pragmatism and some

implications

for empirical inquiry. Journal of Economic Issues, 41(4), 1063-1087.

 

Wen, X., Elicker, J. G., & Mc Mullen, M. B. (2011). Early childhood teachers’

curriculum

belief: Are they consistent with observed classroom practices? Early Education and

Development, 22(6), 945 –969

 

Wiersma, W. (1991). Introduction to research methods in education. British Journal of

Educational Technology (Vol. 40). Retrieved from

http://www.coursesmart.com/9780137144556

 

Yaman, S., & Yalc?n, N. (2005). The effect of problem based instruction in science

teaching on creative thinking. Ilkog?retim Online, 4(1), 45–52.

 

Yunos, J. M., Kiong, T. T., Heong, Y. M., Hussein, A., & Sumarwati, S. (2013).

Pengintegrasian Kemahiran berfikir Aras TInggi Menerusi Peta Minda Dalam

Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. FRGS Vot 0741.

 

Zaid, N. M., & Mohamad, F. (2010). Pembangunan Modul Multimedia Interaktif

Menggunakan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Senario Bagi Tajuk

Pembangunan Perisian Multimedia Berasaskan. … Tajuk Pembangunan Perisian

Multimedia …. Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/11329/

 

Zakiah Mohamad Ashari, Azlina Mohd. Kosnin, & Yeo KeeJiar. (2013). Keberkesanan

Modul Belajar Melalui Bermain Terhadap Kefahaman Pengalaman Pranombor

Kanak-kanak Prasekolah. 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable

Education (ISQAE 2013), 305–312.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.