UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Penggunaan peranti mudah alih dalam pendidikan telah membawa perubahan besar
kepada sistem pendidikan tradisional melalui kemunculan pembelajaran mudah alih
(m-pembelajaran). Peranti mudah alih dilihat berpotensi untuk menyokong
pembelajaran yang lebih demokratik, fleksibel, autonomi, menyeluruh serta
menyokong pembelajaran formal dan tidak formal. Namun demikian, mpembelajaran
di universiti awam merupakan bidang baru dan kadar penggunaannya
perlahan. Ini disebabkan penolakan pengguna untuk menerima sesuatu teknologi
yang mengakibatkan pelaksanaannya berakhir dengan kegagalan.
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti faktor yang menentukan penerimaan,
penggunaan dan keterlibatan pelajar dalam aplikasi mudah alih MClass dalam
kalangan pelajar di universiti awam. MClass merupakan satu aplikasi mudah alih
yang membolehkan capaian akses cepat kepada Internet dari peranti mudah alih
kepada kandungan kursus. Konsep MClass mirip kepada Sistem Pengurusan
Pembelajaran (LMS) namun ia merupakan satu aplikasi yang perlu dimuat turun dari
sistem operasi Android secara atas talian. Antara kategori maklumat yang
ditawarkan menerusi MCIass adalah pengumuman, bahan kursus, forum, kuiz at as
talian, gred peperiksaan serta senarai pelajar,
Kajian berpandukan Teori Bersepadu Penerimaan dan Penggunaan Teknologi
(UTAUT) yang melibatkan pemboleh ubah seperti jangkaan usaha, jangkaan
prestasi, pengaruh sosial, kondisi pemudahcara, hasrat periakuan, tingkah laku
penggunaan serta keterlibatan. Kajian korelasi dengan menggunakan soal selidik
bagi tujuan pengumpulan data. Seramai 299 orang pelajar Ijazah Sarjana Muda Pendidikan (lSMP) di Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris yang mengambil kursus
Pengurusan Pembelajaran dan mendaftar sebagai pengguna MClass telah dipilih
secara rawak. Data di analisis menggunakan Model Persamaan Berstruktur (SEM)
menggunakan perisian AMOS bagi melaksanakan Analisis Faktor Penerokaan
(EFA) dan Analisis Pengesahan Faktor (CFA).
Hasil ujian model struktural menunjukkan lima daripada enam hipotesis kesan
langsung adalah signifikan iaitu; a) jangkaan prestasi memberi kesan kepada hasrat
perlakuan (?=.723, p |
References |
Abachi, H. R., & Muhammad, G. (2014). The impact of m-Iearning technology on students and educators. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 491-496. doi: 1 0.1 016/j.chb.2013.06.018
Abu-Al-Aish, A (2014). Toward mobile learning deployment in higher education. BruneI University, London.
Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors Influencing Students' Acceptance of M-Learning: An Investigation in Higher Education. The International Review ofResearch in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 82-107.
Abu-AI-Aish, A, Love, S., & Hunaiti, Z. (2012). Mathematics students' readiness for mobile learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 4(4), 1-20. Dicapai pada 15 Oktober 2015 dari http://services.igiglobal. comlresolvedoilresolve.aspx?doi= 1 0.40 18/jmb1.20121 00 1 0 1
Ahmad Mahzan Ayob. (1982). Kaedah penyelidikan sosioekonomi. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Ahmad Sobri Hashim, & Wan Fatimah Wan Ahmad. (2011). A study on generic conceptual framework for customized mobile learning management system (CMLMS). 2011 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering, 321-326.
Ain, N., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2015). The influence oflearning value on learning management system use: An extension ofUTAUT2. Information Development, 1 - 16.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. Dicapai pada 5 April 2013 dari http://linkinghub.elsevier.comiretrieve/piil074959789190020T
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Al-Fahad, F. N. (2009). Students ' attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. The Turkish Online Journal ofEducational Technology - TOJET, 8(2), 111-119.
Al-hujran, 0., Al-lozi, E., & Al-debei, M. M. (2014). "Get ?eady.to m?bile learning": Examining factors affecting college students' behavioral mt?n?lOns.to use mLearning in Saudi Arabia. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 10(1), 111-128.
Ali, A (2013). A Framework For Measuring The Usability Issues and Criteria of MobileLearning Applications. Western University, London.
Almatari, A. Y, Iahad, N. A., & Balaid, A. S. (2013). Factors influencing students' intention to use m-learning, Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation, 5, 1-8.
Alrnrashdeh, I. A, Sahari, N., Zin, N. AM., & Alsmadi, M. (2011). Distance Learning Management System requirements from students's perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 17-27.
Al-Qeisi, K. I. (2009). Analyzing the use of UTAUT model in explaining an online behaviour: Internet banking adoption. Universiti BruneI.
Alwahaishi, S., & Snasel, V. (2013). Consumers ' Acceptance and Use of Information and Communications Technology: A UT AUT and Flow Based Theoretical ModeL Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 8(2), 61-73.
Anandarajan, M., Simmers, C., Igbaria, M., Anandarajan, M., Simmers, c., & Igbaria, M. (2010). An exploratory investigation of the antecedents and impact of internet usage: An individual perspective An exploratory investigation ofthe antecedents and impact of internet usage: an individual perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, J9(69-85).
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. (W. C. Learning, Ed.) (Edisi ke 8.). Canada: Wadsworth Cangage Learning.
Attewell, 1. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning. United Kingdom: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
Azizi Yahya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaludin Ramli, Yusof Boon, & Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2007). Menguasai penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Batu Caves: PTS Publication.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1),8-34.
Bandura, A (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37,122-147.
Bandura, A (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. : Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice HalL
Bannon,.L. (2005). A h?man-centred perspective on interaction design. In APlfhonen, H.Isomakl, C.Roast, & P.Saariluoma (Eds.), Future Interaction Design (pp. 9-30). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Barker, A, Krull, G., & Mallinson, B. (2005). A proposed theoretical model for mLearning adoption in developing countries. In Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on mLearning, mLearn 2005. Cape Town, South Africa.
Beckma?, E. ?. (2010). Learners on the move: mobile modalities in development studies. Dzstance Education, 31(2), 159-173.
Bhattcherjee, A (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3),351-370.
Brown, H. T. (2005). Towards a model for MLearning. International Journal on ELearning, 4(3), 299-315.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS basic concepts. applications. and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Cabanban, C. L. G. (2013). Development of mobile learning using Android platform. International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science (IJITCS), 9(1), 98-106.
Canalys. (2013). Top iOS and Android apps largely absent on Windows Phone and BlackBerry 10. Dicapai pada 20 Jun 2016 dari http://www.canalys.cominewsroomitop- ios-and-android-apps-largely-absentwindows- phone-and-blackberry-10
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory ofplanned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054-1064.
Chou, C. C, Block, L., & Jesness, R (2012). A case study of mobile learning pilot project in K-12 schools. Journal ofEducational Technology Development and Exchange, 5(2), 11-26.
Cobcroft, R, Towers, S., Smith, J., & Bruns, A (2006). Mobile lea?in? in. review: Opportunities and challenges for learners, teachers, and mstItutlOns. In Proceedings Online Learning and Teaching (OLT) Conference (pp. 21-30).
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2002). Psychological testing and assessme?t: An introduction to tests and measurements (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Coolican, H. (2004). Research methods and statistics in psychology (4th ed.). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Corbeil, J. R., & Valdes-corbeil, M. E. (2007). Are you ready for mobile learning? Educause Quarterly, 30(2), 51-58.
Corlett, D., Sharples, M., Bull, S., & Chan, T. (2005). Evaluation of a mobile learning organiser for university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3),162-170.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3),319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. Plenum: Plenum. Donaldson, R. L. (2011). Student Acceptance ofMobile Learning. The Florida State University.
Drakhshan, N. (2012). Student and faculty perceptions of the features of Mobile Learning Management Systems in the context of higher education. Oklahoma State University.
Educause. (2010). 7 things you know about mobile apps for learning. Dicapai dari 4 Julai 2013 dari http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pd£,ELI7060.pdf
El-hussein, M. O. M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape research method. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1),12-21.
Ferreira, J. B., Klein, A Z., Freitas, A, & Schlemmer, E. (2013). Mobile learning: Defmition, uses and challenges. In L. A Wankel & P. Blessinger (Eds.), Increasing student engagement and retention using mobile applications: Smartphones, skype and texting technologies (Vol. 6, pp. 47-82). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Fidani, A, & Idrizi, F. (2012). Investigating Students' Acceptance of a Learning Management System in University Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach, 311-320.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Pub.
Fornell, C., & Larker: D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with unobservable vanable sand measurement error. Journal ofMarketin R . h 18(1),39-50. g esearcn,
Fozdar, B. L, & Kumar, L. S. (2007). Mobile learning and student retention. International Journal ofResearch in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-18.
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-HilL
Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing statistical assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina: Statistical Associate Publishing.
Gaskin, C. J., & Happell, B. (2014). On exploratory factor analysis: a review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use. International Journal ofNursing Studies, 51(3), 511-521.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (lOth ed.). New York: Prentice HalL
Gedik, N., Hanci-Karademirci, A., Kursun, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2012). Key instructional design issues in a cellular phone-based mobile learning project. Computers & Education, 58(4),1149-1159.
Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E., & Smrikarov, A. (2004). M-learning - A new stage of E-Learning. In International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies - CompSysTech '2004 M-Learning (pp. 1-5). Rousse, Bulgaria.
Georgieva, E., Smrikarov, A., & Georgiev, T. (2005). A general classification of mobile learning systems. In International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies. Varna, Bulgaria.
Ghazizadeh, S. (2012). Acceptance theory on mobile services and applications. University of Applied Sciences.
Goswarni A & Dutta S (2016) Gender differences in technology usage - A ,., ,. . 51 literature review. Open Journal ofBusiness and Management, 4(January), - 59.
Gupta, B., & Koo, Y. (2010). Applications of mobile learning in higher edu?ati?n: An empirical study. International Journal ofInformation and CommunzcatlO? Technology Education, 6(3), 75-87. Dicapai pada 2 Jun 2014 dan http://services.igi globaLcorn!resolvedoilresolve.aspx?
Hafizul Fahri Hanafi, & Khairulanuar Samsudin. (2012). M?bile le.am?g environment system ( MLES ): The case of Android-based [earning applIcatton on undergraduates ' learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3(3), 1-5.
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education Inc.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hamdan, A, Rosseni Din, & Siti Zuraida Abdul Manaf (2012). Penerimaan mPembelajaran dalam Sistem Pendidikan di Malaysia melalui The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology ( UTAUT ): Satu Analisis Literatur. In International Conference on Mobil Learning, Applications, and Services (mobilcase2012) (pp. 93-97). Melaka.
Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatoryfactor analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harsono, L. D., & Suryana, L. A (2014). Factors affecting the use behavior of social media using UTAUT 2 Model. In Asia-Pacific Conference on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Social Sciences (pp. 1-3). Singapura.
Hayati, A, Jalilifar, A, & Mashhadi, A (2013). Using Short Message Service (SMS) to teach English idioms to EFL students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1).
Hoon, Y., Kim, D. J., & Wachter, K. (2013). A study of mobile user engagement ( MoEN ): Engagement motivations , perceived value , satisfaction , and continued engagement intention. Decision Support Systems, 56, 361-370.
Hsu, H. (2012). The acceptance of Moodie : An empirical study based on UTAUT. Creative Education, 3,44-46.
Hwang, G.-J., & Tsai, Ci-C, (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal ofEducational Technology, 42(4), 65-70.
IDC. (2017). Smartphone OS Market Share, 2017 Ql. Dicapaipada 24 Oktober 2017 dari https:llwww.idc.com!promo/smartphone-market-share/os Internet World Stats. (2017). Internet usage in Asia - Internet users, Facebook subscribers & population statistics for 35 countries and regions in Asia. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm#asia
Iqbal, A, & Yaqub, N. (2010). Mobile Learning Effectiveness in Higher Education. Tesis Sarjana Muda tidak bercetak. Universiti Linnaaeus.
Iqbal, S., & .Qureshi, I. A. (2012). M-Learning adoption: A perspective from a developmg country. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(3), 147-164.
Ismail, r., N??baya, S., & Gunasegaran, T. (2016). Mobile learning in Malaysian Universities : Are students ready?, 10(3), 17-23.
Jairak, K.? Pranee?olgrang, ?., & Mekhabunchakij, K. (2009). An Acceptance of Mobile Learnmg for HIgher Education Students in Thailand. In The Sixth International Conference on eLearningfor Knowledge-Based Society (pp. 17- 18). Thailand.
Jambulingam, M. (2013). Behavioural Intention to Adopt Mobile Technology among Tertiary Students, 22(9), 1262-1271.
Jaradat, M.-I. R. M., & Al Rababaa, M. S. (2013). Assessing key factor that influence on the acceptance of mobile commerce based on modified UTAUT. International Journal ofBusiness and Management, 8(23), 102-112.
Jeng, Y., Wu, T., Huang, Y., Tan, Q., & Yang, S. J. H. (2010). The add-on impact of mobile applications in learning strategies: A review study. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 3-11
Kalloo, v., & Mohan, P. (2011). Correlation between Student Performance and Use of an mLearning Application for High School Mathematics. 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 174-178.
Kamaruzaman, M.. , & ZainoI, L . (2012). Behavior response among secondary school students development towards mobile learning application. In IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science & Engineering Research (CHUSER) (pp. 589-592). Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
Kambourakis, G., & Kontoni, D. P. N. (2004). Introducing attribute certificates to secure distributed e-learning or rn-Iearning services. In Proceedings of the lASTED International Conference (pp. 436-440). Innsbruck, Austria.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2015-2025 (Pendidikan Tinggi). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Khaddage, F., Lanham, E., & Zhou, W. (2009). A mobile learning model for universities -Reblending the current learning environment. International Journal ofInteractive Mobile Technologies, 3(1),18-23.
Khaddase, F., Lanham, E., & Zhow, W. (2009). A mobile learning model for universities rebelnding the current learning environment. International Journal ofInteractive Mobile Technologies, 3(1), 18-23.
Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Chan, Y. P. (2007). A balanced thinking-feelings model of information systems continuance. International Journal oj HumanComputer Studies, 65(6), 511-525.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice oj structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Publications.
Kukulska-hulme, A. (2007). Mobile Usability in Educational Contexts: What have we learnt? International Review oj Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2).
Kukulska-hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., & Vavoula, G. (2011). The genesis and development of mobile learning in Europe. Dalam D. Parsons (Ed.), Combining e-learning and m-learning: New applications oj blended educational resources (pp. 151-176). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Kukulska-hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2007). An OverviewoJMobileAssisted Language Learning: Can mobile devices support collahorative practice in speaking and listening? (pp. 1-20). United Kingdom.
Lam, P., Wong, K., Cheng, R., Ho, E., & Yuen, S. (2011). Changes in student mobile learning readiness - Comparison of survey data collected over a nine-month period. In Proceedings oj Global Learn 2011 (pp. 180-189). Melbourne, Australia.
Lee, H. S., Kim, T. G., & Choi, J. Y. (2012). A Study on the factors affecting smart phone application acceptance. International ConJerence on E-Education, EBusiness, E-Management and E-Learning, 27, 27-34.
Lee, Y. E., & Benbasat, I. (2004). A framework for the study of customer interface design for mobile commerce. International Journal oj Electronic Commerce, 8(3),79-102.
Liew, B. Y. T., Kang, M., Yoo, E., & You, J. (2013). Investigating the determinants of mobile learning acceptance in Korea. In Jan Herrington et al. (Ed.), Proceedings oj World ConJerence on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2013 (pp. 1424-1430). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Lionbridge. (2012). Mobile web apps vs. mobile native apps : How to make the right choice. Dicapai pada 15 Januari 2014 dari www.lionbridge.com!files/20 121 l l/Lionbridge-WP_ MobileApps2.pdf
Liu, L., Chang, C., Huang, H.-C., & Chang, Y.-L. (2016). Verification of social network site use behavior of the University Physical Education Students. EURASIA Journal oj Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(7), 793-805.
Lowenthal,. 1. ?. (2?10). Us?g mobile learning: Determinants behavioural intention. impacting American Journal of Distance Education 24(4) 195- 206. ' ,
Mahizer Hamzah. (2007). Keberkesanan penggunaan perbincangan atas talian dalam portal ?yGuru 2 terhadap pembelajaran di UPSI. 1st International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention, 242-247.
Marchewka, 1. T., Liu, C., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An Application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the lIMA, 7(2),93-104.
Margaryan, A, Littlejohn, A, & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students ' use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429-440.
Martin, F., & Ertzberger, 1. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education, 68, 76-85.
Martin, R. (2011). M-learning and student engagement: Factors that support student s ' engagement in m-learning.
Mehdipour, Y., & Zerehkafi, H. (2013). Mobile Learning for Education: Benefits and Challenges. International Journal of Computational Engineering Researche, 3(6), 93-101.
Meladinovic, 1., & Xiang, H. (2016). A study on factors affecting the behavioral intention to use mobile shoppingfashion apps in Sweden. lonkoping University.
Mitra, A, Lenzmeier, S., Steffensmeier, T., Avon, R., Qu, N., & Hazen, M. (2000). Gender and computer use in an Academic Institution. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1),67-84.
Mobile Marketing Association. (2008). Mobile Applications. Dicapai pada 15 lanuari 2014 dari https:/Iwww.mmaglobal.comlfiles/mobileapplications.pdf
Mohamad, M., & Woollard, 1. (2009). Bringing change in secondary schools: can mobile learning via mobile phones be implemented in malaysia? lnternatioanal Conference on e-Learning. United Kingdom.
Mohamad, M., & Woollard, 1. (2012). Mobile learning via mobile phon?s in Malaysian secondary schools: Seven signs ofpromises. Th? 8 th International Scientific Conference eLearning and software for Education (pp. 218-223). Bucharest, Romania.
Mohd Majid Konting. (2009). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka
Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49(3), 581-596.
Mtebe, J. S. (2014). Acceptance and use ofeLearning solutions in higher education in East Africa. University of Tampere.
Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2004). Literature review in mobile technologies and learning. Futurelab Series, University ofBirmingham. Dicapai pada 23 Disember 2013 http://archive.futurelab.org.uk1
Nassuora, A. B. (2013). Students acceptance of mobile learning for higher education in Saudi Arabia. International Journal ofLearning Management Systems, 1(1), 1-9.
Nik Mastura Nik Mohammad, Mohd Nor Mamat, & Posiah Mohd Isa. (2012). Mlearning in Malaysia: Challenges and Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 393-401.
Nor Fadzleen Sa'don, Halina Mohamad Dahlan, & Abdelrahman Ibrahim. (2014). Usage of Mobile Learning in Malaysian Secondary Education: Stakeholders' View. Journal ofInformation Systems Research and Innovation, 6,42-50.
Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGrawHill. Nunnally, 1. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nurulhuda Salim, & Norfadzliah Mohamad Yatim Haslan Azis. (2017). Mpembelajaran: Kesediaan pelajar KKBBM terhadap era baru medium pembelajaran. In National Innovation and Invention Competition Through Exhibition (iCompEx ' 17).
Nyiri, K. (2002). Towards a Philosophy of M-Learning. In IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mohile Technologies in Education (WMTE '02) (pp. 17-20). Teleborg Campus, Vaxjo University, Vaxjo, Sweden.
O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2010). The development and evaluation ofa survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American SOCietyfor Information Science & Technology, 61(1), 50-69.
O'Brien, H. (2016). Translating theory into methodological practice. In O. H. & C. P. (Eds.), Why Engagement Matters. Springer.
O'Brien, H., & Cairns, P. (2015). An empirical evaluation of the User Engagement Scale ( UES ) in online news environments. Information Processing and Management, 51(4),413-427.
O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008). What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defming user engagement with technology. Journal of the American Societyfor Information Science & Technology, 59(6), 938-955'.
O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2013). Examining the generalizability of the User Engagement Scale (UES) in exploratory search. Information Processing and Management, 49, 1092-1107.
OnGuardOnline.gov. (2011). Understanding mobile apps: Questions & answers. Dicapai pada 15 Januari 2014 dari http://www.onguardonline.gov/articles/Of) 18 -understanding-mo bile-apps
Ooms, A, Linsey, T., Webb, M., & Panayiotidis, A. (2008). The in-classroom use of mobile technologies to support diagnostic and formative assessment and feedback. In Proceedings of the 7th London International Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Conference. London.
Park, J. S., Han, P., & Kang, B. G. (2009). A study on the acceptance for mobile applications(App Store). The Korea Society of Management Information Systems, 160-164.
Park, 1., Yang, S., & Lehto, X. (2007) Adoption of mobile technologies for chinese consumers. Journal ofElectronic Commerce Research, 8(3),196-206.
Park, S. Y, Nam, M.-W., & Cha, S.-B. (2011). University students' behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal ofEducational Technology, 43(4),592-605.
Parsons, 1., & Taylor, L. (2011). Student engagement: What do we know and what should we do? Canada: University of Alberta.
Pechenkina, E., Laurence, D., Oates, G., Eldridge, D., & Hunter, D. (2017). Using a gamified mobile app to increase student engagement, retention and academic achievement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(31).
Pedhazur, E. 1. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). Orlando, FL: Wadsworth.
Pedro, F. (2006). New millennium learners: Challenging our views on ICT and learning. Paris: OECD-CERl.
Pilar, R.-A, Jorge, A, & Cristina, C. (2013). The use of current mobile learning applications in EFL. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 1189- 1196.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review ofPsychology, 63,539-69.
Pollara, P. (2011). Mobile learning in higher education: A glimpse and a comparison of student and faculty readiness, attitudes and perceptions. Neurosurgery. Louisiana State University. Dicapai pada 15 Disember 2014 dari http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedl17690829
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Qureshi, M. R. 1. (2013). IMS-Based mobile learning system. Life Science Journal, 10(4),2121-2126.
Radloff, A, & Coates, H. (2010). Doing morefor learning: Enhancing engagement and outcomes: Australasian Survey (?f Student Engagement : Australasian Student Engagement Doing more for learning: Enhancing engagement and outcomes. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), Camberwell.
Ramayah, T. (2005). Course Website Usage among Distance Learning Business Students: The Role of Prior Experience. International Journal ofLearning, 11, 1507-1517.
Revels, 1., Tojib, D., & Tsarenko, Y. (2010). Understanding consumer intention to use mobile services. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 18(2), 74-80.
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion ofInnovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion ofInnovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Rushby, N. (2011). Editorial: Trends in learning technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 885-888.
Saedah Siraj, Fadzilah Siraj, & Muhammad Helmi Norman. (2012). mLearning: A new dimension of curriculum advancement. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.
Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of roger's diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on roger's. The Turkish Online Journal ofEducational Technology - TOJET, 5(2), 14-23.
Samsiah Bidin, & Azidah Abu Ziden. (2013). Adoption and Application of Mobile Learning in the Education Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 720-729.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., '!'- Th?rnhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. Harlow, United Kmgdom: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Sekaran, U. (2003). Researc? methods for business a skill-building approach (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Shanmugapri?a, .M., & T?larasi, A. (2011). Designing an m-Iearning application for a ubiquitous learnmg environment in the Android based mobile devices using web services. Indian Journal ofComputer Science and Engineering 2(1) 22-30. ' ,
Shao, Y, Crook, c., & Kolevas, B. (2007). Designing a mobile group blog to support cultural learning. In Mlearn2007 (pp. 211-215). Melbourne, Australia.
Sharples, M. (2006). Big issues in mobile learning. In Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence Mobile Learning Initiative. Universiti of Nottingham.
Shepherd, I. L, & Reeves, B. (2011). iPad or iFad- The reality of a paperless classroom. In Mobility Conference (pp. 1-26). United States: Abilene Christian University.
Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, r, & Warshaw R., P. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325- 343.
Shi, W. (2009). An empirical research on users' acceptance of smart phone online application software. In International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Business Intelligence, ECBI2009
Shorfuzzaman, M., & Alhussein, M. (2016). Modeling learners' readiness to adopt mobile learning: A perspective from a GCC Higher Education Institution. Mobile Information Systems, 2016
Sidek Mohd Noah. (2005). Pengujian dan penilaian dalam kaunseling. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Singh, Devinder, & Zaitun Abu Bakar. (2006). Mobile Learning In Wireless Classrooms. Malaysian Online Journal ofInstructional Technology (MOJET), 3(2), 26--42.
Sirat, M., & Kaur, S. (2010). Changing state-university relations: The experience of Japan and lesson for Malaysia. Comparative Education, 46(2), 189-205.
Stevens, D., & Kitchenham, A. (2011). An analysis of mobile learning in ?d?cation, business and medicine. In A. Kitchenham (Ed.), Models for Interdisciplinary Mobile Learning: Delivering Information to Students. IGI Global.
Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia. (2014). Hand Phone Users Survey 2014. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commision.
Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia. (2016). Communictions and multimedia- Pocket book of statistics. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commision.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (Edisi ke 6.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Taiwo, A A, & Downe, A G. (2013). The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (Utaut ): A meta-analytic review of empirical fmdings. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 49(1), 48-58.
Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
Thomas, T. D., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 9(3), 71-85.
Thompson, R.. , Higgins, C. ., & Howell, 1 .. (1991). Personal computing toward a conceptual Model of Utilization. MIS Quarterly, 124-143. Traxler, 1. (2005). Defming mobile learning. In IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning (pp. 261-266).
Ugur, N. G., Koc, T., & Koc, M. (2016). An analysis of mobile learning acceptance by college students. Journal ofEducational and Instructional Studies, 6(2), 39- 49.
UNESCO. (2012). Turning on Mobile Learning in Latin America. Paris. UPSI. (2015). Dasar e-pembelajaran Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (pp. 1-16). Tanjung Malim.
Vavoula, G., Pachler, N., & Kukulska-Hulme, A (2009). Researching mobile learning: Frameworks, tools, and research designs. New York: Peter Lang.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions., 39 (2), 273-312. Decision Science, 39(2), 273-312.
Venkate.sh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3) 425- 478. ' , Venk.atesh, V:, Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, x. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory. MIS Quarterly, 36(1) 157-178. ' Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use ofTechnologu: A synthesis and the road ahead. Forthcoming in Journal of the Associationfor Information Sytems, 17(5), 328-376.
Wachter, K., Kim, Y. H., & Kim, M. (2012). Mobile users: Choosing to engage. International Journal ofSales, Retailing and Marketing, 1 (1), 3-13.
Wang, X., Goh, D. H.-L., Lim, E.-P., Vu, A. W. L., & Chua, A. Y. K. (2017). Examining the effectiveness of gamification in human computation. International Journal ofHuman Computer Interaction, 33(10).
Wang, Y-S., Wu, M.-C., & Wang, H.-Y (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.comll0.llll/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x
We Are Social, & Hootsuite. (2017). 2017 Digital yearbook: Internet, Social media and mobile data for 239 countries around the world. Dicapai pada 25 Oktober 2017 https://wearesocial.comluklspecial-reports/2017-digital-yearbook
West, D. M. (2013). Mobile Learning: Transforming Education, Engaging Students, and Improving Outcomes. In Mobile Learning: Transforming Education and Engaging Students and Teachers. Brookings: Center for Technology Innovation.
Wiersma, W. (2009). Research methods in education (9th ed.). New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education.
Wilkinson, K., & Barter, P. (2016). Do mobile learning devices enhance learning in higher education anatomy classrooms? Journal of Pedagogic Development, 6(1), 14-23.
Winters, N. (2006). What is mobile learning? In M. Sharples (Ed.), Big issues in mobile learning: Report of a workshop by the Kaleidoscope N_etwo.rk of Excellence Mobile Learning Initiative (pp. 5-9). New York: University of Nottingham.
Wong, C. Y., Khong, C. W., & Chu, K. (2012). Inter?ace de?ign practice . and education towards mobile apps development. Procedia - SOCIal and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 698-702. Dicapai pada 5 Jun 2015 dari http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/piilS1877042812033654
Wu, M. (2016). An Examination of Mobile Application Use Intention through the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology Model. The Journal of International Management Studies, 11(1),110-121.
Wu, Y., Tao, Y., & Yang, P. (2007). Using UTAUT to explore the behavior of3G mobile communication users. In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 199-203).
XU, Q. (2015). Examining user engagement attributes in visual information search. In iConference 2015 Examining.
Yi, M. Y., Jackson, l D., Park, l S., & Probst, l C. (2006). Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view. Information & Management, 43,350-363.
Zaefarian, G., Henneberg, S. C., & Naude, P. (2013). Assessing the strategic fit between business strategies and business relationships in knowledge-intensive business services. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(2), 260-272.
Zainudin Awang. (2012). A Handbook on SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) using AMOS graphic. Kota Bharu, Kelantan: Universiti Teknologi MARA.
Zainudin Awang. (2015). SEM made simple, a gentle approach to learning Structural Equation Modelling. Selangor: MPWS Rich Publication.
Zamfrroiu, A. (2013). Interaction in a mobile learning system. In The 9 th International Scientific Conference eLearning and softwarefor Education (pp. 219-225). Bucharest, Romania.
Zhou, T. (2011). Understanding mobile Internet continuance usage from the perspectives ofUTAUT and flow. Information Development, 27(3), 207-218.
Zikmund, W. G., & Babin, B. (2007). Essentials of marketing research. Australia: Thomson South-Western.
Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. r., Carr, l C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business Research Methods (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zoraini Wati Abas, Chng Loi Peng, & Norziati Mansor. (2009). A study on learner readiness for mobile learning at Open University Malaysia. In IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning (pp. 151-157).
Zuraini Zakaria, Fatimah Hassan, Hasmawati Hassan, & Noresah Mohd Shariff (2006). Cabaran pendidikan secara jarak jauh: Kesedaran dan pendedahan dalam era teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi (lCT). |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |