UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :HD28 Management. Industrial Management
Main Author :Norlaile Salleh Hudin
Additional Authors :Abu Bakar Abdul Hamid
Nurul Fadly Habidin
Wan Salmuni Wan Mustaffa
Title :Barrier analysis of supply chain risk management adoption in automotive companies
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
Year of Publication :2019
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
This research identifies the barriers encountered by automotive component manufacturers in adopting supply chain risk management (SCRM). A qualitative case study method was employed at three purposely selected case companies by interviewing 10 senior managers. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis. Results show that the automotive component manufacturers are prominently challenged by the level of understanding of SCRM which led to negative perceptions toward SCRM adoption. In conclusion, this study prepares automotive company managers with a foresight of SCRM adoption challenges so that sufficient planning could be developed for successful SCRM adoption  

References

1. Chileshe, N., & Kikwasi, G. J. (2013). Perception of barriers to implementing risk assessment and management practices by construction professionals in Tanzania. Management, 1137, 1146.

2. Collier, P., Collier, P. M., & Agyei-Ampomah, S. (2005). Management accounting-Risk and control strategy: Elsevier.

3. Ericson, R. (2006). Ten uncertainties of risk-management approaches to security. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 48(3), 345-356.

4. Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Maisano, D. A., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2011). ISO/TS 16949: analysis of the diffusion and current trends. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 225(5), 735-745.

5. Kallenberg, K. (2009). Operational risk management in Swedish industry: Emergence of a new risk paradigm? Risk Management, 11(2), 90-110.

6. Kleffner, A. E., Lee, R. B., & McGannon, B. (2003). The effect of corporate governance on the use of enterprise risk management: Evidence from Canada. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 6(1), 53-73.

7. Kumar, S., Satyendra, & Bhat, A. (2014). Supply chain risk management dimensions in Indian automobile industry: A cluster analysis approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21(6), 1023- 1040.

8. Moshesh, R., Niemann, W., & Kotzé, T. (2018). Enterprise risk management implementation challenges: A case study in a petrochemical supply chain. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 29, 230-244.

9. Ochieng, B. (2019). Effect of Supply Chain Risk Management Practices on Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Kenya. Journal of International Business, Innovation and Strategic Management, 2(1), 14 - 30.

10. Renault, Berenger Y, Agumba, Justus N, & Balogun, OA. (2016). Drivers for and obstacles to enterprise risk management in construction firms: a literature review. Procedia engineering, 164, 402-408.

11. Revilla, E., & Saenz, M. J. (2017). The impact of risk management on the frequency of supply chain disruptions: A configurational approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(5), 557-576.

12. Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations: Simon and Schuster.

13. Rostami, A., Sommerville, J., Wong, I. L., & Lee, C. (2015). Risk management implementation in small and medium enterprises in the UK construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(1), 91-107.

14. Singh, N. (2014). Automotive industry response to its global QMS standard ISO/TS-16949 Globalization and Standards (pp. 121-142): Springer.

15. Yusuwan, N. M., Adnan, H., Omar, A. F., & Kamaruzaman, J. (2008). Clients' perspectives of risk management practice in Malaysian construction industry. J. Pol. & L., 1, 121.

16. Zhao, X. (2015). Enterprise risk management in international construction firms: drivers and hindrances. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(3), 347-366. doi: 10.1108/ecam09-2014-0117


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)