Kesedaran sensitiviti moral melalaui aktiviti analisis filem pendek: satu kajian tindakan di kelas Pendidikan Moral

Nadarajan Thambu

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
Main Author :	Nadarajan Thambu
Additional Authors :	Chander Vengadasalam Vasanthan Gurusamy
Title :	Kesedaran sensitiviti moral melalaui aktiviti analisis filem pendek: satu kajian tindakan di kelas Pendidikan Moral

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains Kemanusiaan
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Sensitiviti moral merupakan unsur yang menjadi tunjang kepada sesuatu perlakuan moral. Sensitiviti moral melibatkan proses mentafsir perasaan orang lain, kemahiran empati dan patuh kepada prinsip moral. Justeru artikel ini membincangkan hasil kajian tentang potensi aktiviti menonton dan analisis filem pendek sebagai kaedah pengajaran dalam mencungkil unsur sensitiviti moral dalam kalangan murid sekolah menengah. Seramai 18 orang murid perempuan dan lelaki (tiga kumpulan berfokus) dari kelas Pendidikan Moral tingkatan empat digunakan untuk tujuan pengumpulan data. Teknik pensampelan bertujuan digunakan untuk memilih peserta kajian. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan reka bentuk kajian tindakan yang menggunakan kaedah temu bual, pemerhatian dan penulisan jurnal murid. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan aktiviti menonton dan analisis filem pendek dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan Moral mampu mencungkil sensitiviti moral dalam kalangan murid tingkatan empat. Mempunyai sensitiviti moral adalah satu nilai murni yang amat penting kepada seseorang murid dalam memupuk kesedaran tentang sesuatu isu moral dan keupayaan untuk mengambil pertimbangan wajar sebelum menyelesaikan sesuatu konflik

References

1. Abdul Shatar Che Abdul Rahman. 2009. Pengetahuan kandungan dan pedagogi guru Pendidikan Moral tingkatan empat di sebuah sekolah. Tesis doktor falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.

2. Bebeau, M.J., Rest, J.R. & Narvaez, D. 1999. Beyond the promise: A perspective on research in moral education. Educ. Res. 28(4): 18-26.

3. Bebeau, M. 2002. The defining issues test and the four component model: Contributions to professional education. Journal of Moral Education 31(3): 271-295.

4 Bhugra, D. 2003. Using film and literature for cultural competence training. Psychiatric Bulletin 27(11): 427-428.

5. Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen, S.K. 2007. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. New York, NY: Pearson.

6. Boyatzis, C.J. 2002. Using feature films to teach social development. In Handbook for Teaching Introductory Psychology: Vol. 3: With an emphasis on assessment, edited by Griggs, R.A. Mahwah, NJ US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Buda.

7. Cassidy, M.F. & Knowlton, J.Q. 1983. Visual literacy: A failed metaphor? Educational Communication and Technology 31: 67-90.

8. Chan, D. & Herrero, C. 2011. Using Film to Teach Languages: A Teachers’ Toolkit for Educators Wanting to Teach Languages using Film in the Classroom, with a Particular Focus on Arabic, Mandarin, Italian and Urdu. Manchester, Cornerhouse.

9. Chow, Y.L. & Jaizah Mahamud. 2011. Kajian tindakan: Konsep dan Amalan dalam Pendidikan. Puchong: Penerbitan Multimedia.

10. Corrigan, Timothy. 2001. A Short Guide to Writing about Film. New York: Longman.

11. Crowell. 2005. Moral Psychology and Information Ethics: Psychological Distance and the Components of Moral Behavior in a Digital World. USA: University of Notre Dame.

12. David Wilkinson & Peter Birmingham. 2014. Using Research Instruments-A Guide for Researchers. Routledge Study Guides, Routledge.

13. Fatimah Hashim. 2001. Penyelidikan tindakan di sebuah sekolah. Dalam Penyelidikan Kualitatif: Pengalaman Kerja Lapangan Kajian, disunting oleh Marohaini Yusoff. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

14. Gallese & Guerra, M. 2012. Embodying movies: Embodied simulation and film studies. Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Movin: 183-210.

15. Gallese, V. 2005. “Being like me”: Self-other identity, mirror neurons and empathy. Perspectives on Imitation: From Cognitive Neuroscience to Social Science (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

16. George Lakoff & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

17. Hannah Chapelle Wojciehowski & Vittorio Gallese. 2011. “How Stories Make Us Feel: Toward an Embodied Narratology,” California Italian Studies.

18. Heinrichs, K. & Oser, F. 2013. Handbook of Moral Motivation. Sense Publishers.

19. Jan Patocka. 1998. Body, Community, Language, World. Chicago: Carus Publishing Company

20. Joseph E. Champoux. 2007. Film as a teaching resource. Journal of Management Inquiry 1999 8(2): 240-251.

21. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. 2000. Sukatan Pelajaran Pendidikan Moral KBSM (Semakan). Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. Kuala Lumpur.

22. Kemmis, S. 2009. What is to be done? The place of action research. Keynote address to the Annual Conference of the Collaborative Action Research Network (CARN), Athens, Greece.

23. Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. 1988. The Action Research Planner. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.

24. Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. 2005. Participatory action research: communicative action and the public sphere. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.), edited by

25. Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Thousand Oaks: Sage.Kirsh, S.J. 1998. Using animated films to teach social and personality development. Teaching of Psychology 25(1):49-51.

26. Krugman, H.E. 1965. The impact of television advertising: Learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly 29: 349-356.

27. Liau, A. K., Liau, A.W. L., Teoh, G. B. S. & Liau, M.T. L. 2003. The case for emotional literacy: The influence of emotional intelligence on problem behaviours in Malaysian secondary school students. Journal of Moral Education 32(1): 51-66.

28. Maiese, Michelle. 2005. “Emotions.” Beyond Intractability. Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder.

29. Marois, R. 2005a. Capacity limits of information processing in the human brain. Phi Kappa Phi Forum 85: 30-33.

30. Nadarajan Thambu & Muhammad Hasbi Abdul Rahman. 2017. Forum Theatre as a behavior change strategy: Qualitative findings from Moral Education class. SEARCH: The Journal of the South East Asia Research Centre for Communications and Humanities 9(1): 25-46.

31. Oliveira, E., Martins, P. & Chambel, T. 2013. Accessing movies based on emotional impact. Multimedia Systems 19(6).

32. Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. 1990. Pukal Latihan Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah

33. Falsafah Pendidikan Negara. (1990). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

34. Peppino Ortoleva. 2010. Una Specie di Transfert. Spettacoloe spettatore, da un antico dibattitoall’esperienza filmica etelevisiva, talk given at the International Conference Eticae Spettacolarità, Almo Collegio Borromeo, Pavia, 21-22 Sept.

35. Rest, J.R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. & Thoma, S. 1999. Postconventional Moral Thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

36. Rizzolati, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V. & Fogassi, L. 1996. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research 3: 131-141.

37. Rosenstock, J. 2003. Beyond A Beautiful Mind: Film choices for teaching schizophrenia. Academic Psychiatry 27(2):117-122.

38. Smith, H. 2009 (1981, 2nd ed). Strategies of Social Research. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

39. Sobchack, Vivian. 2012. Being on the screen. A phenomenology of cinematic flesh, or the actor’s four bodies. In Acting and Performance in Moving Image Culture. Bodies, Screens, Renderings, ed. Jörg Sternagel, Deborah Levitt, Dieter Mersch, 429-445. Bielefeld: Transcript.

40. Springer, S. P. & Deutsch, G. 1998. Left Brain, Right Brain. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

41. Stavros, C. & Westberg, K. 2009. Using triangulation and multiple case studies to advance relationship marketing theory. Qualitative Market Research 12(3): 307-320.

42. Stephen Kemmis. 2011. A Self-Reflective Practitioner and a New Definition of Critical Participatory Action Research. Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia ,Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education 7, DOI © Springer Science & Business Media B.V.

43. Tan, E. & Pearce, N. 2012. Open education videos in the classroom: Exploring the opportunities and barriers to the use of YouTube in teaching introductory sociology. Research in Learning Technology 19: 0174.

44. Till, B., Niederkrotenthaler, T., Herberth, A., Voracek, M., Sonneck, G. & Vitouch, P. 2011. Coping and film reception. Journal of Media Psychology 23(3): 149-160.

45. Torben Grodal. 1997. Moving Pictures: A New Theory of Film Genres, Feelings and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

46. Vishalache Balakrishnan. 2009. Teaching moral education in secondary schools using real-life dilemmas. Tesis doktor falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan, Victoria University of Wellington.

47. Vittorio Gallese. 2003. The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism. Royal Society of London 358: 517-528.

48. Vittorio Gallese. 2011. Neuroscience and Phenomenology, Phenomenology & Mind 1. Trends in Cognitive Sciences:33-48.

49. Watts, R. 2007. Harnessing the power of film in the primary classroom. Literacy 41(2): 102-109.

50. Wedding, D., Boyd, M.A. & Niemiec, R.M. 2010. Movies and Mental Illness: Using Films to Understand Psychopathology (3rd rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA US: Hogrefe Publishing.

51. Wirth, W. & Schramm, H. 2005. Media and Emotions. Communication Research Trends 24(3).

52. Whitehead, J. & McNiff, J. 2006. Action Research Living Theory. London, UK: Sage.

53. Zainal Madon & Mohd. Sharani Ahmad. 2004. Panduan Mengurus Remaja Moden. Bentong: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

54. Zainul Arifin Md. Isa. 2012. Grads without soft skills victims of system. New Straits Times, p. 19.

55. Zillmann, D. 1996. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Routledge, New York.

56. Zimmermann, G. 2006. Review of movies and mental illness: using films to understand psychopathology. Swiss Journal of Psychology 65(1).

57. Zuber-Skerrit, O. 1992. Action Research in Higher Education: Examples & Reflections. London: Kogan Page Ltd.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page