UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :PE English
Main Author :M.Arinal Rahman
Title :The effectiveness of mingle model to improve Banjarese undergraduates speaking skills
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
Year of Publication :2019
Notes :pedagogi
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
In this globalisation era, Indonesian university students’ speaking skills is increasingly recognised as a serious concern in English language teaching and learning. Empirical evidence showed that the students stihave problem in speaking, both accurately and fluently. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Darmayenti and Nofiadri (2015) Mingle Model to improve Banjarese undergraduates’ speaking skills. Sample consists of two selected intact group of second-semester students at a university in South Kalimantan, with a total of 33 undergraduates who were divided into the experimental and control groups. The control group went through the conventional teaching speaking method while the experimental group went through the Mingle Model. This is a mixed method study which utilised the quantitative and qualitative approach. In the quantitative phase, data of both groups were collected through a quasi-experimental method which involved the pretest and posttest. An interview was also conducted to investigate the views of the experimental group on the use of the Mingle Model to improve their speaking accuracy and speaking fluency. Data collected were analysed using serial t-test and the Five-Phases Cycles analysis. The t-test results were statistically significant (p < .05) with t (31) = - 2.416, sig = .011 for the speaking accuracy and t (31) = -2.597, sig =.007 for the speaking fluency. The qualitative results indicated that the participants found the Mingle Model provided an easy way to communicate in the class and optimised the learning time. The overall results of the study showed that the Mingle Model was an effective approac to improve students’ speaking accuracy and speaking fluency as compared to the conventional teaching speaking method. To further prove, a followup study using true experimental design and with a variety of population on the Mingle Model is essential to expand the comprehension on the use of the model.

References

American  Psychological  Association.  (2010).  Publication  manual  of  the  American

Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington: Author.

 

 

Best, J. W., & Khan. (2006). Research in education (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson

Borzova,  E.  (2014).  Mingles  in  the  foreign  language  classroom.   English  Teaching Forum, 

52( 2), 20-27.

 

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching.  San Francisco: Longman

 

Brown,  H.  D.,  &  Abeywickrama,  P.  (2010).  Language  assessment:  Principles  and classroom 

practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson-Longman.

 

Bruner, J.S. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A.  Sinclair, R. Jarvella & 

W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), The child’s conception of language. New York: Springer-Verlag.

 

Campbell, D. T., Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. 

Chicago: Rand McNally.

 

Choosri, C., & Intharaksa, U. (2011). Relationship between motivation and students’ English   

learning   achievement:   A   study   of   the   second-year   vocational certificate  level  

Hatyai  Technical  College  Students.  The  3rd  International Conference on Humanities and Social 

Sciences Proceedings. Retrieved from http://tar.thailis.or.th/bitstream/123456789/665/1/006.pdf

 

 

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2010). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed 

methods approaches. Upper Saddle Creek: Sage publications.

 

Creswell, J.,W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative   

and   qualitative   research.   Upper   Saddle   Creek:   Pearson Education.

 

 

Darmayenti & Nofiadri, N. (2015). Mingle model for teaching English speaking skill for college 

students. Al-Ta lim Journal, 22(1), 1-9.

 

Dewi, R. K. (2011). Improving students’ speaking skill through dialogue (an action research 

conducted at the tenth year students of SMAN 1 Teras, Boyolali of the academic year 2010/2011). 

[Unpublished] Thesis. Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta.

 

Dewi,  R.  S.  (2015).  The  effect  of  teaching  method  and  achievement  motivation  on

student’s   speaking   ability   an   exprimental   study   on   student   of   English

uin   syarifhidayatullah   jakarta.   A   Thesis.   Teacher

Training and Islamic Education Faculty, University Islam of Syarif

Hidayatullah, Jakarta. (Online) Retrieved from

http://103.229.202.68/dspace/handle/123456789/30794 on December 15th,

2017.

 

Edge, J. (1993). Essentials of English language teaching. London: Longman.

 

Esmail, A., Ahmed, M., & Noreen, S. (2015). Why do Pakistani students are reluctant

to speak english. Academic Research International, 6(3), 372-383.

 

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to design and evaluate

research in education (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

 

Geyse, J. P. (2007). Teaching speaking made easy (English to the world). Selangor:

August Publishing.

 

Goh, H. S. (2004). The use of think-aloud in a collaborative environment to enhance

the reading comprehension abilities of ESL students at tertiary level. Kuala

Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.

 

Hadijah, S. (2014). Investigating the problems of english speaking of the students of

islamic boarding school program at STAIN Samarinda. Dinamika Ilmu:

Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 240-247.

 

Hakim, A. N. (2014). Using English mingle game to improve the speaking ability of

the seventh grade students at SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Mlati in the academic

year of 2013/2014. [Unpublished]. Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia.

 

Handayani, S. (2016). Pentingnya kemampuan berbahasa inggris sebagai dalam

menyongsong ASEAN community 2015. Jurnal Profesi Pendidik, 3(1), 102-

106.

 

Harmer, J. (2010). How to teach English. Edinburg Gate: Pearson Education Limited.

 

Horwitz, E. K. (2007). Becoming a language teacher: A practical guide to second

language learning and teaching. Boston.: Pearson.

 

Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second

language acquisition. Applied linguistics, 30(4), 461-473.

 

Hughes, R. (2011). Teaching and researching speaking (2nd ed.). Harlow, England:

Longman.

 

Humphries, S. C., Burns, A., & Tanaka, T. (2015). “My head became blank and I

couldn’t speak”: Classroom factors that influence English speaking. The

Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 164-175.

 

Indonesia. (2000). 1945 Constitution of the republic of indonesia second

amandement..

 

Indonesia. (2003). National education system law .

 

Jonson, K. F. (2006). 60 strategies for improving reading comprehension in grades

K–8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

 

Kayi, H. (2006) Teaching speaking activities to promote speaking in a second

language. The Internet TESL Journal, 12(11), 33-49.

 

Kementerian Riset Teknologi Dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia (28 July

2017), Visi, misi & strategi [Blog Post] retrieved from

http://www.dikti.go.id/visi-misi-strategi/.

 

Khosravi S, Rezaee M, Sheikh Ahmadi A, Agajanzade M, (2015). The effect of

motivation on young Kurdish learning on the learning English speaking as

second language in Iran. International Journal of Language Learning and

Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 9(3), 142-155.

 

Klippel, F. (1984). Keep talking: Communicative fluency activities for language

teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Kurnia, N., Degeng, I. N. S., & Soetjipto, B. E, (2017). The implementation of find

someone who and two stay two stray models to improve students’ selfefficacy

and social studies learning outcomes. IOSR Journal of Research &

Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(3), 66-70.

 

Lauder, A. (2010). The status and function of English in Indonesia: A review of key

factors. Hubs-Asia, 12(1). 9-12.

 

Li, Q. (2014). Differences in the motivation of Chinese learners of English in a

foreign and second language context. System, 42, 451-461.

 

Mattarima, K., & Hamdan, A. R. (2016). The teaching constraints of English as a

foreign language in Indonesia: the context of school based curriculum.

Sosiohumanika, 4(2), 287-300.

 

McDonough, J. & C. Shaw. (1993). Materials and methods in ELT. Oxford:

Blackwell.

 

Misso, V., & Maadad, N. (2016). The English language and cultural

appropriateness. Sosiohumanika, 4(1), 111-128.

 

Mufidah, N. (2015). English education department alumni’s perspective on English

curriculum development of IAIN Antasari Banjarmasin. Vidya Karya Jurnal

Kependidikan, 30(1).589-664.

 

Nation, P. (1989). Improving speaking fluency. System, 17(3), 377-384.

 

Nation, I. S., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New

York: Routledge.

 

Nunan, D. (1996). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

 

Nur & Madkur. (2014). Teachers’voices on the 2013 curriculum for English

instructional activities. Indonesian Journal of English Education (IJEE),

1(2), 119-134.

 

Nurhaniyah, B., Soetjipto, B. E., & Hanurawan, F. (2015). The Implementation of

Collaborative Learning Model" Find Someone Who and Flashcard Game" to

Enhance Social Studies Learning Motivation for the Fifth Grade

Students. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(17), 166-171.

 

Polard, L & Hess, N. (1997). Zero prep: Ready to go activities for teachers.

Herforthshire: Prentice Hall.

 

Putri, A. (2016). Low motivation in learning speaking. Anglo-Saxon, 7(1), 14-20.

 

Ruzieva, N. ?., & Yuldasheva, F. E. (2017). The use of mingles in the communicative

way of teaching. ??????????? ???????? ?????? ??????????, 1(1), 138-

139.

 

Samana, W. (2013). Teacher’s and students’ scaffolding in an EFL

Classroom. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(8), 338-343.

 

Sava?ç?, M. (2014). Why are some students reluctant to use L2 in EFL speaking

classes? An action research at tertiary level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral

Sciences, 116, 2682-2686.

 

Seymour, D., and M. Popova. (2003). 700 classroom activities: Instant lessons for

busy teachers. Oxford: Macmillan Education.

 

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.

Harvard educational review, 57(1), 1-23.

 

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, England:

Oxford University Press.

 

Sugeng, B. (2015). Need for increasing grammar focus in English teaching: A case in

Indonesia. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(3), 131-138.

 

Teng, F., & Wong, J. (2015). Speed speaking: A new activity to engage more learners

to talk. ELTA Journal, 3(3), 47-58.

 

Thornbury, S. (2009). How to teach speaking. Harlow: Longman.

 

Tracy, K., & Robles, J. S. (2013). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities

(2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

 

Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

 

Vogt, M. E., and J. Echevarría (2008). 99 ideas and activities for teaching English

learners with the SIOP Model. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

 

Vigoya, F. S. T. (2000). Testing accuracy and fluency in speaking through

communicative activities. HOW Journal, 5(1), 95-104.

 

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In Gauvain &

Cole (Eds.) Readings on the development of children. New York: Scientific

American Books. pp. 34 – 40.

 

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological

processes. M. cole et al. (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

 

Woollard, J., & Pritchard, A. (2013). Psychology for the classroom: Constructivism

and social learning. Routledge.

 

Yahya, Z. (2017). The rise of global english and language policies of China, Japan,

Thailand and Malaysia. In A. Pieterse et al. (Eds.). Changing constellations

of southeast asia: from Northeast Asia to China. New York, NY: Routledge.

 

Yin, R. K. (2009). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York, NY: The

Guilford Press

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.