|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| In Malaysia the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was introduced in 1988, as a measure of sustainability in developmental projects. The aim of this study was to examine the compliance with the guidelines and ecological adequacy of the information input in the preparation of the EIA report. The ecological input is an important part of the EIA. In this study, the choice was made for two EIA reports in Melaka which was sent to the DOE for approval. The method used was according to the revised package of measurement for 12 ecological input criteria in the EIA report. The results of this study found many omissions in the provision of ecological inputs and disobedience. Among the twelve criteria for assessment of the ecological inputs available in the description of the existing environment, consultants were not sensitive enough to identify the sample geology, flora and fauna and aquatic habitat. The review of the EIA report showed there were reports describing the effects of individual and yet try not to quantify these effects. For further description of mitigation measures to the physical aspect, no emphasis was made on the effectiveness of the proposed measures. In addition, mitigation measures were implemented. The residual impact was discussed briefly in both reports. The results of the survey in the vicinity of the project site also found a lot of environmental impact of specific ecosystems and flora and fauna of the river ecosystem. The dust pollution also affected the surrounding community. Overall, both the EIA report for the project was found to be less effective including information regarding ecological input and compliance aspects. A comprehensive and commitment of all parties is crucial to ensure continuity in the development process that can be achieved through improvements in the preparation of the EIA report mainly for information and compliance with ecological guidelines. |
| References |
[1] Department of Environment. (1995) Guidelines EIA for mines and quarries. Ministry of Natural Resources & Environment: Department of Environment. [2] Department of Environment (1996). Environmental quality report. Ministry of Natural Resources & Environment: Department of Environment. [3] Department of Environment. (2000). A handbook environmental impact assessment guidelines. Ed. ke-3. Ministry of Natural Resources & Environment: Department of Environment. [4] Department of Environment (2001). Visual pollution caused by quarrying activities. Quaterly Bulletin of Department of Environmental DOE (IMPAK) 1(2001). [5] Department of Environment (2004). Annual report 2004 Department of Environment. Ministry of Natural Resources & Environment: Department of Environment. [6] Department of Environment (2015). Annual report 2015. Ministry of Natural Resources & Environment: Department of Environment. [7] MOSTE, (1998). Country study of biological diversity: Assessment of biological diversity in Malaysia. Malaysia: Ministry of Natural Resources & Environment MOSTE 1998. Country study on biological diversity: assessment of biological diversity in Malaysia. Malaysia: Kementerian Sains, Teknologi & Alam Sekitar. [8] Morris, P. & Therivel, R. (2001). Methods of environmental impact assessment. Ed. ke-2. Spon Press: London. [9] Therivel, R. & Partidario, M. R. (1996). The practice of strategic environmental impact assessment. Earthscan Publication Ltd:London. [10] Thompson, S., Treweek, J. R. & Thurling, D. J. (1997). The ecological component of environmental impact assessment: a critical review of British environmental statements. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 40 (2):157-171. [11] Treweek, J. (1999). Ecological impact assessment. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |