UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :QA Mathematics
Main Author :Nuur Fathiah Nadia Ahmad Termizi
Title :Keberkesanan strategi pengajaran geogebra terhadap pengetahuan konseptual, usaha mental dan kecekapan pengajaran topik persamaan kuadratik
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :2018
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ini bertujuan menentukan kesan Strategi Pengajaran GeoGebra (SPG) terhadap pencapaian murid Tingkatan 4, pencapaian konseptual, pencapaian prosedural, usaha mental dan kecekapan pengajaran dalam topik Persamaan Kuadratik. Reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen ujian pra-pasca kumpulan kawalan tidak setara dijalankan terhadap 60 orang murid Tingkatan 4 dari sebuah sekolah di daerah Kota Bharu, Kelantan. Dua kelas diagihkan secara rawak kepada dua kumpulan iaitu kumpulan rawatan yang menjalani SPG dan kumpulan kawalan yang menggunakan Strategi Pengajaran Konvensional (SPK) bagi topik Persamaan Kuadratik. Instrumen yang digunakan ialah Ujian Pencapaian Persamaan Kuadratik yang mengandungi soalan pengetahuan konseptual dan pengetahuan prosedural, dan Skala Perkadaran Usaha Mental. Data dianalisis menggunakan dua kaedah iaitu analisis statistik deskriptif dan statistik inferens. Analisis deskriptif melibatkan penggunaan min, sisihan piawai, frekuensi dan peratusan. Manakala analisis inferens melibatkan penggunaan ujian-t sampel bebas, MANOVA dan MANCOVA. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan antara kumpulan SPG dan kumpulan SPK terhadap pencapaian keseluruhan dan pencapaian pengetahuan konseptual [F (2,57) = 57.97, p < 0.05]. Seterusnya, analisis MANCOVA menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan antara kumpulan SPG dan kumpulan SPK dalam pencapaian pengetahuan prosedural, usaha mental dan kecekapan pengajaran apabila ujian pra ketiga-tiga pemboleh ubah bersandar dijadikan kovariat [F(3,53) = 46.05, p < 0.05]. Min tahap pengetahuan konseptual (Min SPG=18.17; Min SPK=11.17) dan tahap pengetahuan prosedural (Min SPG=14.67; Min SPK=10.50) kumpulan SPG adalah lebih tinggi berbanding kumpulan SPK setelah menjalani SPG. Manakala min usaha mental kumpulan SPG adalah lebih rendah berbanding kumpulan SPK (Min SPG=66.73; Min SPK=90.90). Kesimpulannya, SPG memberikan impak yang positif terhadap pencapaian keseluruhan murid terutamanya dalam meningkatkan pencapaian pengetahuan konseptual dan pencapaian pengetahuan prosedural mereka dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematik. Murid dapat membezakan antara pemahaman konsep dan prosedural dengan lebih baik sekali gus dapat mengurangkan beban kognitif dan usaha mental murid. Implikasi kajian ini adalah integrasi perisian GeoGebra dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik boleh dijadikan satu strategi alternatif yang mampu meningkatkan kecekapan pengajaran.

References

Abdul Halim Abdullah, Johari Surif, Nor Hasniza Ibrahim, Ali, M. & Hamzah, M. H.

(2014). The Development of MyGSP: An Online Resource for Teaching

Mathematics Based on Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP). Asian Social Science,

10(22), 227- 240.

 

Abdul Razak Idris & Nor Asmah Salleh. (2011). Pendekatan Pengajaran Yang Digunakan

Oleh Guru Sekolah Menengah Di Daerah Johor Bharu Dalam Pengajaran Dan

Pembelajaran Matematik. Journal of Science and Mathematics Educational.

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Ali Bin Abdul Ghani. (2012). Pengarah Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian

Pelajaran Malaysia.

 

Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi, Kamariah Abu Bakar & Aida Suraya

Md Yunus, A. S. (2008). A Comparison of Malaysian Secondary Students

Perceived Ease Of Use and Usefulness of Dynamic Mathematical Software.

International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 2(3), 194-201.

 

Agus Rizal & Effandi Zakaria. (2013). Kepercayaan Matematik Dan Kefahaman

Konseptual Pelajar Dalam Topik Integral. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 1(2),

14-26.

 

Ayu Erlina & Effandi Zakaria. (2014). Kesan Keupayaan Perisian Geogebra Ke Atas

Keupayaan Penyelesaian Masalah Dan Pencapaian Matematik Pelajar. Jurnal

Pendidikan Matematik, 2(1), 51-64.

 

Baker, W. (2002). Written meta-cognition and procedural knowledge. Educational

Studies In Mathematics, 32, 1-36.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2012). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan : McGraw-Hill.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2014). Kaedah Penyelidikan (Buku 1), Edisi Ketiga : McGraw-Hill.

 

Coakes, S. J., Steed, L. & Ong, C. (2009). SPSS: Analysis without anguish: version 16

for Windows: Australia: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

 

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).

Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

 

Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues

for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating

qualitative & quantitative research (4th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods

Approaches. California: Sage Publications.

 

Desi Haryanti, Bistari & Hamdani. (2013). Memperbaiki Pengetahuan Dan Kemampuan

Prosedural Siswa Melalui Metode Penugasan Berbaris Kesalahan. Program Studi

Pendidikan Matematik, Universiti Tanjung Pura Pontianak, Indonesia.

 

De Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research and instructional design:

Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105-134.

 

Effandi Zakaria, Norazah Mohd Nordin & Sabri Ahmad. (2007). Trend Pengajaran dan

Pembelajaran Matematik. Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd.

 

Endang Istikomah & Nor Sakinah Mohamad. (2013). Kesan Penggunaan Perisian

Geometers’ Sketchpad Ke Atas Kefahaman Konsep Matematik Pelajar. Jurnal

Pendidikan Matematik, 1(2), 1-13.

 

Gagne, M. & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal

of Organizational Behavior. 26, 331 – 262.

 

Gay, L. R. (1987). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application: 3rd

ed. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

 

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E. & Airasian, P. (2009). Education Research: Competencies for

Analysis and Applications. United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc.

 

Haciomeroglu, E.S., Bu, L., Schoen, R. C. & Hohenwarter, M. (2009). Learning to

Develop Mathematics Lessons with GeoGebra. MSOR Connections Vol 9 No 2

May – July 2009.

 

Haryani Hamid & Norhayati Ismail. (2014). Kajian Persepsi Penerimaan Dan Perlakuan

Pelajar Terhadap Perisian Geogebra. Politeknik Tuanku Sultanah Bahiyah :

Jabatan Matematik, Sains dan Komputer

 

Hiebert, J. (1986). Conceptual and Procedural : The case of mathematics. Hillsdale:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Hutkemri Zulnaidi. (2013). Pembangunan Dan Keberkesanan Modul Perisian Geogebra

Ke Atas Pengetahuan Konseptual dan Pengetahuan Prosedural. Kertas Tesis

Penyelidikan Doktor Falsafah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Hutkemri Zulnaidi & Effandi Zakaria. (2012). The Effect of Using Geogebra on

Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of High Scholl Mathematics Students.

Asian Social Science; Vol. 8, No. 11.

 

Jackson, S. L. (2003). Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach.

USA: Thomson Wadsworth.

 

Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2000). Educational research: Quantitative and

qualitative approaches. Allyn & Bacon.

 

Kamariah Abu Bakar, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. (2010).

Exploring the Effectiveness of Using Geogebra and E-Transformation in Teaching

and Learning Mathematics. Advance Educational Technologies, 19-23.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1989). Laporan Jawatankuasa Kabinet Mengkaji

Dasar Pelajaran. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah,

Spesifikasi Kurikulum, Matematik Tambahan Tingkatan 4. Putrajaya: Bahagian

Pembangunan Kurikulum.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia

2013-2025 Pendidikan Prasekolah Hingga Lepas Menengah. Putrajaya

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Panduan Pengurusan Mata Pelajaran

Matematik Sekolah Rendah Sekolah Menengah. Putrajaya: Jemaah Nazir dan

Jaminan Kualiti.

 

Lay, Y. F., & Khoo, C. H. (2013). Pengenalan Kepada Pendekatan Kuantitatif Dalam

Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kota Kinabalu: Penerbit Universiti Malaysia Sabah.

 

Mahayon Abas. (2005). Kefahaman ungkapan algebra pelajar tingkatan empat. Tesis

Sarjana. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Mainali, B. R., & Key, M. B. (2014). Using dynamic geometry software GeoGebra in

developing countries : A case study of impressions of mathematics teachers in

Nepal. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1-16.

 

Marzita Puteh. (2012). Mathematics Anxiety: The Need to Overcome It!. Tajong Malim,

Perak: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Mazlini Adnan & Effandi Zakaria. (2013). Pengetahuan Konseptual Pecahan Dalam

Kalangan Bakal Guru Matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik

Malaysia, Vol. 2 No. 1 ISSN 2232-0393.

 

Md. Nor Bakar & Rashita A. Hadi. (2011). Pengintegrasian ICT Dalam Pengajaran Dan

Pembelajaran Matematik Di Kalangan Guru Matematik Di Daerah Kota Tinggi.

Journal of Science and Mathemarics Educational, Volume 2, Pages 1-17.

 

Miller, S. (2001). Workload measures. The University of Iowa, (August), 1-65.

Mok S. S. (1995). Asas Pendidikan 3 – Penilaian Dalam Proses Pendidikan. Kuala

Lumpur. Kumpulan Budiman Sdn Bhd.

 

Mohd Zamri Abdullah. (2012). Kesan Penggunaan Perisian Geogebra Ke Atas Motivasi

dan Pencapaian Pelajar. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Muhamad Hafizhuddin Abdul Rahman. (2016). Kesan Modul Pengintegrasian GeoGebra

Topik Trigonometri Terhadap Pencapaian Dan Motivasi Bagi Murid

Berpencapaian Rendah. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics

Reports: Finding from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science

Study at the Fourth and Eight Grades. Trends in International Mathematics and

Science Study. IEA TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre, Lynch School of

Education, Boston College.

 

Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (1981). Research Methods in the Social Sciences:

Alternative second edition without statistics. New York. NY: St. Martin Press.

 

Noor Hisham Jalani & Sern, L. C. (2012). Beban Kognitif Dalam Pembelajaran

Berasaskan Masalah. Proceeding of 2012 World Congress, 4 Oktober, 2012, pp.

26-36.

 

Noor Shah Saad & Sazeli Abdul Ghani. (2010). Teaching Mathematics in Secondary

School: Theories and Practices. Tanjung Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan

Idris.

 

Nor’ain Mohd Tajuddin. (2008). Effects of Using Graphics Calculators in the Teaching

and Learning of Mathematics on Students’ Performance and Metacognitive

Awareness. Tesis Ph.D. Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Nor’ain Mohd Tajuddin. (2013). Graphing Calculator and Geometers’ Sketchpad in

Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH), 2,

53-66.

 

Noraini Idris. (2010). Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur. McGraw Hill

(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.

 

Norazah Mohd Nordin & Effandi Zakaria. (2007). Pembelajaran Matematik Berbantukan

Komputer. Dlm. Effandi Zakaria, Norazah Mohd Nordin dan Sabri Ahmad. Trend

Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik, hlm. 67-79. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan

Publications & Distributors.

 

Norazah Mohd Nordin, Effandi Zakaria, Nik Rahimah Nik Mohamed & Mohamed Amin

Embi. (2010). Pedagogical Usability of the Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP) Digital

Module in the Mathematics Teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Educational

Technology-TOJET, 9, 113-117.

 

Norlia Abd. Aziz, Subahan, T., Meerah, M., Lilia Halim & Kamariah Osman. (2006).

Hubungan Antara Motivasi, Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapaian Matematik

Tambahan Pelajar Tingakatan 4. Jurnal Pendidikan 31 (2006) 123-141.

 

Nornadiah Mohd Razali & Yap Bee Wah. (2011). Power Comparisons of Shapiro Wilk,

Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling Test. Journal of

Statistical Modeling and Analytics Vol.2 No.1, 21-33.

 

NCES (2004). Highlights From the Trends in International Mathematics and Science

Study (TIMSS) 2003. US: National Centre for Education Statistics.

 

NCES (2009). Highlights From the Trends in International Mathematics and Science

Study (TIMSS) 2007. US: National Centre for Education Statistics.

 

NCES (2013). Highlights From the Trends in International Mathematics and Science

Study (TIMSS) 2011. US: National Centre for Education Statistics.

 

Needham, R. (1987). Teaching strategies for developing understanding in science. The

University Of Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.

 

Nik Noralhuda Nik Mohamed & Nor Hasnida Che Md Ghazali. (2013). Pengetahuan

Konseptual Dan Prosedural Dalam Pendidikan Matematik. Fakulti Pendidikan

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Noguera de Lima, R. & Tall, D. (2008) Procedural Embodiment and magic in linear

equations. Educational Studies In Mathematics, 67(1), 3-18.

 

Nor Liza Zaini. (2005). Pengetahuan konseptual dalam topik pecahan di kalangan guruguru

pelatih maktab perguruan. Projek Sarjana Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan

Malaysia. Bangi.

 

Othman Talib. (2013). Asas Penulisan Tesis Penyelidikan & Statistik (Cetakan Pertama).

Kuala Lumpur. Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in

statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal Educational Psychology, 84, 429-

434.

 

Paas, F. G., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions:

An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human

Factors,35(4),737-747.

 

Paas, F. G., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and

transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach.

Journal of educational psychology, 86(1), 122-133.

 

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design:

Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.

 

Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H. & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load

measurement as a means to advanced cognitive load theory. Educational

Psychology, 38(1), 63-71.

 

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual. A Step By Step Guide to Data Analysis Using

IBM SPSS 6th edition. McGraw Hill Education.

 

Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Kota Bharu, 2015. Senarai Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan

dan Sekolah Menengah Agama dalam daerah Kota Bharu.

 

Praveen, S. & Leong K.E. (2013). Effectiveness of Using Geogebra on Students

Understanding in Learning Circles. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational

Technology, 1(4), 1-11.

 

Reis, Z. A. (2010). Computer Supported Mathematics with Geogebra. Procedia-Social

and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1449-1455.

 

Rincon, Luis F. (2009). Designing Dynamic and Interactive Applications Using

Geogebra Software. Kean University. ERIC Full text and Thesis. [8 Oktober

2009].

 

Rittle-Johnson, B. & Alibali. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of

mathematics: Does one lead to the other. Journal of Education Psychology 91(1),

175-189.

 

Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R.S. & Alibali. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding

and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational

Psychology 93(2), 346-362.

 

Rittle-Johnson, B. & Star, J. R. (2007). Does comparing solution method facilitate

conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to

solve equations. Journal of Education Psychology 99(3), 561-574.

 

Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2009). Compared to what? The effects of different

comparisons on conceptual knowledge and procedural flexibility for equation

solving. Journal of Educational Psychology 101(3), 529-544.

 

Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R. & Durkin K. (2009). The important of prior knowledge

when comparing examples : Influences on conceptual and procedural knowledge

of equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology 101(4), 836-852.

 

Rohani Aziz, Mohamad Johari Yaakob & Effandi Zakaria. (2007). Pemahaman

Konseptual Dan Prosedural Dalam Matematik. Dlm. Effandi Zakaria. Norazah

Mohd Nordin dan Sabri Ahmad. Trend Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik,

hlm. 81-93. Kuala Lumpur : Utusan Publications & Distributors.

 

Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi, Che Wan Rosida Wan Hasan, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub,

Kamariah Abu Bakar & Aida Suraya Md. Yunus. (2009). Penggunaan kalkulator

grafik dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik. Dlm, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd

Ayub & Aida Suraya Md. Yunus (pnyt). Pendidikan Matematik & Aplikasi

Teknologi. Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Royati Abdul Saha, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. (2010). The

Effects of Geogebra on Mathematics Achievement: Enlightening Coordinate

Geometry Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 686-693.

 

Rozinah J. (2000). Asas-asas Multimedia Dalam Pendidikan, Kuala Lumpur. Utusan

Publication & Distributor Sdn. Bhd.

 

Sallehudin & Fauziah (1996). Kualiti pengajaran dan pembelajaran Sains Matematik di

sekolah-sekolah menengah – analisis dan perakuan. Prosiding Simposium

Kebangsaan Sains Matematik ke VII (1996): 37-42.

 

Saniah Sembak, Nor Hasnida Che Md Ghazali, & Noorzeliana Idris. (2011). Kesan

strategi pengajaran berasaskan konstruktivisme terhadap pengetahuan

konseptual pelajar. National Academic Conference (ENRICH 2011), Universiti

Teknologi MARA Kelantan.

 

Seow, S. H. & Tan, S. K. (2002). Mewujudkan Konsep Matematik, dalam Prosiding

Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Matematik 2002. m.s. 255-262.

 

Sharifah Maimunah Syed Zin. (2008). Curriculum Innovation and Teacher Development.

3rd International Conference on Principalship and School Management: School

Improvement, Research, Development and Practice, University of Malaya.

 

Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding.

Mathematics teaching, 77, 20-26.

 

Star, J. R. (2000). On the relationship between knowing and doing in procedural learning.

InB. Fishman & S. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Proceeding of the Fourth

International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 80-86). Mahwah, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum.

 

Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive

load. Educational Psychology Review.

 

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving : Effects on learning. Cognitive

Science,12(2),257-285.

 

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design.

Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.

 

Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia: ACER

Press.

 

Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Pass, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture

and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.

Tabachnick, B. G, & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistic (6th ed.) California

State University- Northridge

 

Ting, S. H. (2013). The Use of GeoGebra Software Integrated In Teaching Circle III

Topic on Form Four Student. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Tunku Badariah Tuanku Ahmad. (2014). Between School Factors and Teacher Factors :

What Inhibits Malaysian Science Teachers From Using ICT? The Malaysian

Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(1), 1-10.

 

Tuovinen, J. E., & Paas, F. (2004). Exploring multidimensional approaches to the

efficiency of instructional conditions. Instructional Science, 32, 133-152.

 

Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2004). Process-oriented worked

examples: Improving transfer performance through enhanced understanding.

Instructional Science, 32(1-2), 83-98.

 

Van Gog, T. & Paas, F. (2008). Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct

in educational research. Educational Psychologist, 43(1), 16-26.

 

Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2006). Effects of process-oriented

worked examples on troubleshooting transfer performance. Learning and

Instruction, 16, 154-164.

 

Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for

complex learning: The 4C/ID- model. Educational Technology, Research and

Development , 50(2), 39-64.

 

Vijaya Kumaran (1996). Multimedia Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Sains: Satu

Cabaran. Kertas Kerja di Seminar Kurikulum Sains Kebangsaan di Langkawi.

 

Yeh, Y., & Wickens, C. D. (1988). Dissociation of performance and subjective measures

of workload. Human Factors, 30(1), 111-120.

 

Zainal Abidin Zainuddin & Afrinaleni Suardi. (2009). Keberkesanan Kaedah

Konstruktivisme Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Matematik. Fakulti

Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The Effect of Dynamic Mathematics

Software GeoGebra on Student Achievement in Teaching of Trigonometry.

Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 183-187.

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.