Menangani kekaburan kemahiran prosedur dan terminologi awal matematik:pendekatan leksis berdasarkan teori prosodi semantik

Anida Sarudin

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
Main Author :	Anida Sarudin
Additional Authors :	Husna Faredza Mohamed Redzwan Zulkifli Osman Raja Noor Farah Azura Raja Maamor Shah Intan mohd ariff albakri
Title :	Menangani kekaburan kemahiran prosedur dan terminologi awal matematik:pendekatan leksis berdasarkan teori prosodi semantik

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Tujuan – Kajian ini bertujuan mengenal pasti pedagogi guru awal Matematik dalam kalangan kanak-kanak di Pusat Anak PERMATA Negara (PAPN) dan mengenal pasti sejauh manakah pendekatanleksis berdasarkan Teori Prosodi Semantik dapat menjelaskan kekaburan kemahiran prosedur dan terminologi awal Matematik Metodologi – Kajian ini melibatkan 20 orang guru dan 60 orang 1. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam kajian ini ialah soal selidik dan senarai semak pencerapan dan pemudahcaraan (PdPc). Proses pencerapan PdPc hanya melibatkan 8 orang guru yang terpilih secara rawak. Kajian ini juga mengaplikasikan korpus daripada Pangkalan data Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (DBP) untuk meneliti kolokasi kata dan konteks berkaitan leksikal padanan, kumpul, mengasingkan dan banding. Dapatan – Hasil kajian mendapati bahawa PdPc, guru mengajar konsep padanan dengan menjelmakan perkataan cari yang sama, pilih yang sama, sama tak bentuk, sama dengan, dan tarik, manakala konsep kumpul dijelmakan dengan leksikal seperti mengikut yang sama, dan ambil semua. Seterusnya konsep asing dijelmakan dengan leksikal kira, cuba kira, ambil, masukkan, cari dan mana. Seterusnya, konsep membanding diajarkan dengan menyebut leksikal bezakan dan yang mana. Pendekatan leksis berasaskan Teori Prosodi Semantik dapat menunjukkan konteks awal Matematik, iaitu konsep padanan, kumpul, asing dan membanding dengan tepat dari pelbagai perspektif kolokasi. Signifikan – Kajian ini mengetengahkan pendekatan leksis yang dapat menawarkan strategi baharu dalam pengajaran awal Matematik berteraskan Teori Prosodi Semantik.

References

Aiken, L. R. Jr. (1973). Ability and creativity in mathematics.Columbus, Ohio: ERIC Information Center.

Ashaari, Z. M., Mohd Kosnin, A., & Jiar, Y. K. (2013). Keberkesanan modul belajar melalui bermain terhadap kefahaman pranombor kanak-kanak prasekolah. Prosiding 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE) 2013. Kuala Lumpur.

Aunio, P., & Niemivirta, M. (2010). Predicting children’s mathematical performance in grade one by early numeracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 427-435.

Bley-Vroman. (1989). What is the logical of foreign language learning? In Susan M. Guss, Jacquelyn Schachter. Linguistic Perspective on Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bradby, D., Owings, J., & Quinn, P. (1992). Language characteristics and academic achievement: A look at Asian and Hispanic eighth graders in NELS: 88. Statistical Analysis Report. Berkeley: MPR Associates. (ED 343 971).

Bryant, P., & Nunes, T. (2002). Children’s understanding of mathematics. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 412−439). Malden, The Netherlands: Blackwell.

Clement, R .(1980). Ethnicity, contact and communicative competence in a second language. In. Giles, H. M., Robinson, W. P., & Smith, P. M., Eds., Language: Social Psychological Perspectives,147-154.

Clements, D. (1999). Teaching length measurement: Research challenges. School Science and Mathematics, 99(1), 5-11.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool Mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38 (2), 136-163.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014). The Importance of the Early Years. In R. E. Slavin (Ed.), Science, Technology & Mathematics (STEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Cross, C. T., Woods, T. A., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematics Learning in Early Childhood: Paths Toward Excellence and Equity. Washington, DC, US: National Academies Press.

Dowker, A. (2005). Individual Differences in Arithmetic: Implications for Psychology, Neuroscience and Education. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Firth, J. R. (1957). A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930-1955. In Liu Runqing et al (Eds). Readings in Linguistics: SeventyFive Years Since Saussure. Vol. 1, 328-359. Beijing: Cehui Press.

Ginsburg, H. P., Cannon, J., Eisenband, J. G., & Pappas, S. (2006). Mathematical thinking and learning. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), Handbook of early child development (pp.208–229). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Hashim, N. H., & Che Lah, Y. (2003). Panduan pendidikan prasekolah. Pahang: PTS Publications & Distributors Sdn.Bhd.

Husin, Z. (2014). Komunikasi dalam penyelesaian masalah matematik dalam kalangan murid tingkatan empat. (TesisDoktor Falsafah). Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Jalaluddin, N. H., Sarudin, A., & Ahmad, Z. (2012). Peluasan maknaalim: Analisis semantik kognitif. GEMA Online™ Journal ofLanguage Studies, 12(2), 457-473.

Jamison, R. E. (2000). Learning the language of Mathematics. Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/llad/v4n1/jamison.pdf.

Konting, M. M. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. KualaLumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Korpus DBP. Diperoleh dari: http://sbmb.dbp.gov.my/korpusdbp/SelectUserCat.aspx

Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 178–181.

Loretta C. Rudd., Macy Satterwhite., & Matthew C. Lambert. (2010). One, two, buckle my shoe: Using math-mediated language in preschool. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 38(2), 30-38.

Louw, W. E. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. (pp. 157-176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Marican, S. (2016). Penyelidikan sains sosial: Pendekatan pragmatik. Batu Caves: Edusystem.

Mohd Faizal Nizam., Lee, A., & Tze, W. L. (2017). Kesahan dankebolehpercayaan instrumen penilaian kendiri pembelajaran

geometri Ti ngkatan Satu. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 211-265.

Mohd Kosnin, A., & Mohd Khalid, S. H. (2010). Strategi-strategi dalam penyelesaian masalah Matematik berperkataan dalam kursus statistik 1. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

NAEYC. (2001). NAEYC Standards for Early Childhood Professional Preparation.Washington, DC: Author.National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).2002, April; updated 2010). Early childhood Effects of Math for Little Kids 43 mathematics: Promoting good beginnings. (Position statement). Retrieved from NAEYCn website: www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/psmath.pdf.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Va: Publisher.

Pappas, S., Ginsburg, H., & Jiang, M. (2003). SES differences in young children’s metacognition in the context of Mathematical problem solving. Cognitive Development, 18, 43-450.

Puteri Roslina, A. W.(2005). Definisi dan konteks dalam terminologiBahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pengajian Melayu, 16, 55-71.

Rudd, L. C., Lambert, M. C., Satterwhite, M., & Zaier, A. (2008). Mathematical language in early childhood settings: What really counts? Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(1), 75-80.

Samian, A. L. (1997). Falsafah Matematik. Selangor: Percetakan Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.

Sarudin, A., & Jalaluddin, N. H. (2015). Peluasan makna wakaf: Analisis berdasarkan proses dan prinsip kognitif. Pertanika Mahawangsa , 2(2), 9-30 .

Sarudin, A., Raja Ma’amor Syah, R. N. F. A., Mohamed Redzwan, H. F., Osman, Z., Othman, W. M., Mohd Ariff Albakri, I.S. (2019). Lexical approach: Overcoming vague skills procedure and early Mathematical terminology based on the prosodic semantic theory. Journal of Mechanics of Continua and Mathematical Sciences, 14(3), 94-111.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th Ed.). Haddington: John Wiley & Sons.

Seo, K.-H., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2004). What is developmentally appropriate in early childhood Mathematics education? Lessons from new research. In D. H. Clements, J. Sarama, & A.-M. DiBiase (Eds.), Engaging Young Children in Mathematics: Standards for Early Childhood Mathematics Education (pp. 91–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Sie Na, Chong., Chong Siew Ha., & Rosli, R. (2017). Penggunaankaedah cubes dalam penyelesaian masalah Matematik berayat Tahun 6. Simposium Pendidikan Diperibadikan: Perspektif Risalah An-Nur (SPRiN2017), 42-56.

Sinclair, J. (1996). The search for units of meaning. Textus IX, 75-106

Stanic, G. M. A., & Kilpatrick, J. (1992). Mathematics curriculum reform in the United States. A historical perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 17, 407-437.

Starkey, P., & Klein, A. (2008). Sociocultural influences on young children’s Mathematical knowledge. In Contemporary Perspectives on Mathematics in Early Childhood Education(pp. 253–276). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Stern, E. (1993). What makes certain arithmetic word problemsinvolving the comparison of sets so hard for children? Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 7-23.

Tengku Zainal, T. Z., Mustapha, R., & Abdul Razak. (2009). Pengetahuan pedagogi isi kandungan guru Matematik bagi tajuk pecahan: Kajian kes di sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 34(1), 131-153.

Wilder, R. L. (2010). Matematik suatu budaya. Shaharir Mohamed Zain (Terj.). Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Yahaya, A., Hashim, S. Ramli., S., Boon Y., & Hamdan, A. R. (2007). Menguasai penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Edisi Kedua. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn Bhd.

Yahaya, A., & Elanggovan. (2010). Kepentingan kefahaman konsep dalam Matematik. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Diperolehdaripada http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/10413/

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page