UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :L Education (General)
Main Author :Albahrey, Osamah Shihab Ahmed
Additional Authors :Ahmed, Hamsa Hameed
Al-Juboori, Aos A. Z. Ansaef
Zaidan, Bilal Bahaa
Title :Multi-criteria evaluation and benchmarking for young Learners
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
Year of Publication :2019
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
This study proposes an evaluation and benchmarking decision matrix (DM) on the basis of multicriteria decision making (MCDM) for young learners‘ English mobile applications (E-apps) in terms of listening, speaking, reading and writing (LSRW) skills. Benchmarking E-apps for young learners is challenging due to (a) multiple criteria, (b) criteria importance and (c) data variation. The DM was constructed on the basis of the intersection amongst evaluation criteria in terms of LSRW and E-apps for young learners. The criteria were adopted from a preschool education curriculum standard. The DM data included six E-apps as alternatives and 17 skills as criteria. Thereafter, the six E-apps were evaluated by distributing a checklist form amongst six English learning experts. These apps were subsequently benchmarked by utilising MCDM methods, namely, best–worst method (BWM) and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). BWM was used for criterion weighting, whereas TOPSIS was employed to benchmark and rank the apps. TOPSIS was utilised in two contexts, namely, individual and group. In the group context, internal and external aggregations are applied. Mean was computed to ensure that the E-apps undergo a systematic ranking for objective validation. This study provides scenarios and a benchmarking checklist to evaluate and compare the proposed work with six relative studies. Results indicated that (1) BWM is suitable for criteria weighting. (2) TOPSIS is suitable for benchmarking and ranking Eapps. Moreover, the internal and external TOPSIS group decision making exhibited similar findings, with the best app being ?Montessori‘ and the worst app being ?FunWithFlupe.‘ (3) For objective validation, remarkable differences were observed amongst the group scores, which indicate that the internal and external ranking results are identical. (4) In the evaluation, the proposed DM revealed advantages over the six relative studies by 40.00%, 53.33%, 40.00%, 46.67%, 46.67% and 46.67%.

References

[1] Y. T. C. Yang and C. Y. Chan, ?Comprehensive evaluation criteria for English learning websites using expert validity surveys,? Comput. Educ., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 403–422, 2008.

[2] M. Robson, ?The English Effect: The impact of English, what it‘s worth to the UK and why it matters to the world,? Br. Counc., pp. 1–24, 2013.

[3] F. Walter and F. Wrester, ?Early Childhood Development?:,? J. Child. Dev., vol. 23, no. 232, p. 23, 2009.

[4] Y. Chen, D. Zhou, Y. Wang, and J. Yu, ?Application of augmented reality for early childhood english teaching,? Proc. - 2017 Int. Symp. Educ. Technol. ISET 2017, pp. 111–115, 2017.

[5] R. Gangaiamaran, ?Review on Use of Mobile Apps for Language Learning,? vol. 12, no. 21, pp. 11242–11251, 2017.

[6] G. Oakley and U. Imtinan, ?Supporting children‘s literacy learning in low-and middle-income countries through mlearning,? in Mobile Technologies in Children’s Language and Literacy: Innovative Pedagogy in Preschool and Primary Education, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2018, pp. 155–175.

[7] K. O. Jeong, ?University Students‘ Perception and Motivation of Using Digital Applications as Effective English Learning Tools,? 2017 Int. Conf. Platf. Technol. Serv. PlatCon 2017 - Proc., pp. 3–6, 2017.

[8] Y. Kim and D. Smith, ?Pedagogical and technological augmentation of mobile learning for young children interactive learning environments,? vol. 4820, no. November, 2015.

[9] M. F. Kamaruzaman and I. H. Zainol, ?Behavior response among secondary school students development towards mobile learning application,? 2012 IEEE Colloq. Humanit. Sci. Eng., no. Chuser, pp. 589–592, 2012.

[10] B. S. Gomathi, ?Enriching the skills of rural students with effective methods of teaching english language using LSRW skills,? vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 65–69, 2014.

[11] X. L. Pham, T. H. Nguyen, W. Y. Hwang, and G. D. Chen, ?Effects of push notifications on learner engagement in a mobile learning app,? Proc. - IEEE 16th Int. Conf. Adv. Learn. Technol. ICALT 2016, pp. 90–94, 2016.

[12] E. Yadegaridehkordi and M. Alaa, ?Mobile Learning for English Language Acquisition?: Taxonomy , Challenges , and Recommendations,? vol. 5, 2017.

[13] R. B. Sadiq, N. Cavus, and D. Ibrahim, ?Mobile application based on CCI standards to help children learn English as a foreign language,? Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 0, no. 0,pp. 1–16, 2019.

[14] R.-A. Pilar, A. Jorge, and C. Cristina, ?The Use of Current Mobile Learning Applications in EFL,? Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 103, pp. 1189–1196, 2013.

[15] M. Kalz et al., ?Smartphone apps for cardiopulmonary pesuscitation training and real incident support: a mixedmethods evaluation study,? J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 16, no. 3, 2014.

[16] S. Ba?aran and O. J. Aduradola, ?A Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Rank Android based Mobile Applications for Mathematics Soft Computing View project cloud computing View project A Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Rank Android based Mobile Applications for Mathematics,? Artic. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 99–107, 2018.

[17] Q. M. Yas, A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, B. Rahmatullah, and H. Abdul Karim, ?Comprehensive insights into evaluation and benchmarking of real-time skin detectors: Review, open issues & challenges, and recommended solutions,? Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 114, pp. 243–260, 2018.

[18] M. Leonid et al., ?Transforming computer lab into a mini hpc cluster,? no. Ciit, pp. 252–255, 2013.

[19] A. R. Karimi;, N. Mehrdadi;, and S. J. Hashemian; G. R. Nabi Bidhendi; R. Tavakkoli Moghaddam, ?Selection of wastewater treatment process based on the analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods,? Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 267– 280, 2011.

[20] A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, M. Hussain, A. Haiqi, M. L. M. Kiah, and M. Abdulnabi, ?Multi-criteria analysis for OSEMR software selection problem: A comparative study,? Decis. Support Syst., vol. 78, pp. 15–27, 2015.

[21] B. N. Abdullateef, N. F. Elias, H. Mohamed, A. A. Zaidan, and B. B. Zaidan, ?An evaluation and selection problems of OSS-LMS packages,? Springerplus, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 248, 2016.

[22] N. I. Jaini, ?AN EFFICIENT RANKING ANALYSIS IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING,? 2017.

[23] B. B. Zaidan, A. A. Zaidan, H. A. Karim, and N. N. Ahmad, ?A new digital watermarking evaluation and benchmarking methodology using an external group of evaluators and multi?criteria analysis based on ?large?scale data,‘? Softw. Pract. Exp., vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1365–1392, 2017.

[24] B. B. Zaidan and A. A. Zaidan, ?Software and hardware FPGA-based digital watermarking and steganography approaches: Toward new methodology for evaluation and benchmarking using multi-criteria decision-making techniques,? J. Circuits, Syst. Comput., vol. 26, no. 07, p. 1750116, 2017.

[25] Z. Chen and W. Yang, ?A new multiple attribute group decision making method in intuitionistic fuzzy setting,? Appl. Math. Model., vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 4424–4437, 2011.

[26] B. B. Zaidan, A. A. Zaidan, H. Abdul Karim, and N. N. Ahmad, ?A new approach based on multi-dimensional evaluation and benchmarking for data hiding techniques,? Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., pp. 1–42, 2017.

[27] B. Rahmatullah, A. A. Zaidan, F. Mohamed, and A. Sali, ?Multi-complex attributes analysis for optimum GPS baseband receiver tracking channels selection,? in 2017 4th international conference on control, decision and information technologies (CoDIT), 2017, pp. 1084–1088.

[28] A. Roozbahani, B. Zahraie, and M. Tabesh, ?PROMETHEE with Precedence Order in the Criteria (PPOC) as a New Group Decision Making Aid: An Application in Urban Water Supply Management,? Water Resour. Manag., vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 3581–3599, 2012.

[29] J. Liu, P. Liu, S.-F. Liu, X.-Z. Zhou, and T. Zhang, ?A study of decision process in MCDM problems with large number of criteria.,? Int. Trans. Oper. Res., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 237–264, 2015.

[30] K. I. Mohammed et al., ?Real-Time Remote-Health Monitoring Systems: a Review on Patients Prioritisation for Multiple-Chronic Diseases, Taxonomy Analysis, Concerns and Solution Procedure,? J. Med. Syst., vol. 43, no. 7, p. 223, 2019.

[31] V. Podvezko, ?The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS,? Eng. Econ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 134–146, 2011.

[32] X. Deng, P. Vroman, X. Zeng, and B. Laouisset, ?Intelligent decision support tools for multicriteria product  design,? 2010 IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybern., pp. 1223–1230, 2010.

[33] M. Khatari, A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zidan, O. S. Albahri, and M. A. Alsalem, ?Multi-criteria evaluation and benchmarking for active queue management methods: Open issues, challenges and recommended pathway solutions,? Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., 2019.

[34] A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, M. A. Alsalem, O. S. Albahri, A. S. Albahri, and M. Y. Qahtan, ?Multi-agent learning neural network and Bayesian model for real-time IoT skin detectors: a new evaluation and benchmarking methodology,? Neural Comput. Appl., pp. 1–52.

[35] C. K. Lim, K. L. Tan, A. A. Zaidan, and B. B. Zaidan, ?A proposed methodology of bringing past life in digital cultural heritage through crowd simulation: a case study in George Town, Malaysia,? Multimed. Tools Appl., pp. 1–37, 2019.

[36] H. M. Al-Otaibi, R. A. Alamer, and H. S. Al-Khalifa, ?The next generation of language labs: Can mobiles help? A case study,? Comput. Human Behav., vol. 59, pp. 342–349, 2016.

[37] Y. T. Chuang, ?MEMIS: A Mobile-Supported EnglishMedium Instruction System,? Telemat. Informatics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 640–656, 2017.

[38] K. Segaran, A. Z. M. Ali, and T. W. Hoe, ?Usability and User Satisfaction of 3D Talking-head Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) App for Non-native Speakers,? Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 131, pp. 4–10, 2014.

[39] Z. A. Silfiani and Y. S. Rezeki, ?Teaching pronunciation in speaking using prosody pyramid,? J. Pendidik. dam Pembelajaran, vol. 6, no. 10, 2017.

[40] L.-K. Lee, C.-H. Chau, C.-H. Chau, and C.-T. Ng, ?Using Augmented Reality to Teach Kindergarten Students English Vocabulary,? 2017 Int. Symp. Educ. Technol., pp. 53–57, 2017.

[41] Q. M. Yas, A. A. Zadain, B. B. Zaidan, M. B. Lakulu, and B. Rahmatullah, ?Towards on Develop a Framework for the Evaluation and Benchmarking of Skin Detectors Based on Artificial Intelligent Models Using Multi-Criteria DecisionMaking Techniques,? Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell., vol. 31, no. 03, p. 1759002, 2017.

[42] F. M. Jumaah, A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, R. Bahbibi, M. Y. Qahtan, and A. Sali, ?Technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution for solving complex situations in multi-criteria optimization of the tracking channels of GPS baseband telecommunication receivers,? Telecommun. Syst., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 425–443, 2018.

[43] M. M. Salih, B. B. Zaidan, A. A. Zaidan, and M. A. Ahmed, ?Survey on fuzzy TOPSIS state-of-the-art between 2007–2017,? Comput. Oper. Res., 2018.

[44] N. Kalid, A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, O. H. Salman, M. Hashim, and H. Muzammil, ?Based real time remote health monitoring systems: A review on patients prioritization and related" big data" using body sensors information and communication technology,? J. Med. Syst., vol. 42, no. 2, p. 30, 2018.

[45] F. M. Jumaah, A. A. Zadain, B. B. Zaidan, A. K. Hamzah, and R. Bahbibi, ?Decision-making solution based multimeasurement design parameter for optimization of GPS receiver tracking channels in static and dynamic real-time positioning multipath environment,? Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 118, no. July 2016, pp. 83–95, 2018.

[46] C. Paper, S. Christodoulou, N. Karacapilidis, and M. Tzagarakis, ?Advancing collaborative decision making through alternative visualizations and reasoning mechanisms,? no. October 2015, 2013.

[47] O. H. Salman, A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, Naserkalid, and M. Hashim, ?Novel Methodology for Triage and Prioritizing Using ?Big Data‘ Patients with Chronic Heart  Diseases Through Telemedicine Environmental,? Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., vol. 16, no. 05, pp. 1211–1245, Sep. 2017.

[48] B. B. Zaidan and A. A. Zaidan, ?Comparative study on the evaluation and benchmarking information hiding approaches based multi-measurement analysis using TOPSIS method with different normalisation, separation and context techniques,? Measurement, vol. 117, pp. 277–294, 2018.

[49] A. A. Zaidan et al., ?A review on smartphone skin cancer diagnosis apps in evaluation and benchmarking: Coherent taxonomy, open issues and recommendation pathway solution,? Health Technol. (Berl)., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 223–238, 2018.

[50] S. Christodoulou, N. Karacapilidis, and M. Tzagarakis, ?Exploiting Alternative Knowledge Visualizations and Reasoning Mechanisms to Enhance Collaborative Decision Making,? in Intelligent Decision Technology Support in Practice, Springer, 2016, pp. 89–106.

[51] M. A. Alsalem et al., ?Systematic Review of an Automated Multiclass Detection and Classification System for Acute Leukaemia in Terms of Evaluation and Benchmarking, Open Challenges, Issues and Methodological Aspects,? J. Med. Syst., vol. 42, no. 11, p. 204, Nov. 2018.

[52] A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, A. Al-Haiqi, M. L. M. Kiah, M. Hussain, and M. Abdulnabi, ?Evaluation and selection of open-source EMR software packages based on integrated AHP and TOPSIS,? J. Biomed. Inform., vol. 53, pp. 390–404, 2015.

[53] M. Migdadi, ?Knowledge management enablers and outcomes in the mall-and-medium sized enterprises,? Ind. Manag. Data Syst., vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 840–858, 2009.

[54] N. H. Hussain, T. Siti, M. Tengku, S. Fadzilah, and M. Noor, ?Speech Input as an Alternative Mode to Perform Multi-touch Gestures,? TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Comput. Electron. Control., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1367–1375, 2018.

[55] K. Olson, ?An examination of questionnaire evaluation by expert reviewers,? Field methods, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 295–318, 2010.

[56] F. I. Feng, ?A study on school leaders‘ ethical orientations in Taiwan,? Ethics Behav., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 317–331, 2011.

[57] A. S. Albahri, A. A. Zaidan, O. S. Albahri, B. B. Zaidan, and M. A. Alsalem, ?Real-Time Fault-Tolerant mHealth System: Comprehensive Review of Healthcare Services, Opens Issues, Challenges and Methodological Aspects,? J. Med. Syst., vol. 42, no. 8, 2018.

[58] S. Guo and H. Zhao, ?Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications,? KnowledgeBased Syst., vol. 121, pp. 23–31, 2017.

[59] H. A. AlSattar et al., ?MOGSABAT: a metaheuristic hybrid algorithm for solving multi-objective optimisation problems,? Neural Comput. Appl., pp. 1–15, 2018.

[60] O. Enaizan et al., ?Electronic medical record systems: Decision support examination framework for individual, security and privacy concerns using multi-perspective analysis,? Health Technol. (Berl)., pp. 1–28, 2018.

[61] M. A. O. Barrios, F. De Felice, K. P. Negrete, B. A. Romero, A. Y. Arenas, and A. Petrillo, ?An AHP-Topsis Integrated Model for Selecting the Most Appropriate Tomography Equipment,? Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., vol. 15, no. 04, pp. 861–885, 2016.

[62] M. A. Ortíz, J. P. Cómbita, Á. A. D. la Hoz, F. De Felice, and A. Petrillo, ?An integrated approach of AHPDEMATEL methods applied for the selection of allied hospitals in outpatient service,? Int. J. Med. Eng. Inform., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 87, 2016.

[63] Suzi et al., ?Medical emergency triage and patient prioritisation in a telemedicine environment: A systematic review.,? Heal. Technol. journal., 2019.

[64] M. Iphar and S. Alpay, ?A mobile application based on multi-criteria decision-making methods for underground mining method selection,? Int. J. Mining, Reclam. Environ., vol. 0930, no. May, pp. 1–25, 2018.

[65] J. Rezaei, ?Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method,? Omega (United Kingdom), vol. 53, no. June 2015, pp. 49–57, 2015.

[66] O. S. Albahri et al., ?Fault-tolerant mHealth framework in the context of IoT-based real-time wearable health data sensors,? IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 50052–50080, 2019.

[67] E. M. Almahdi, A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, M. A. Alsalem, O. S. Albahri, and A. S. Albahri, ?Mobile patient monitoring systems from a benchmarking aspect: Challenges, open issues and recommended solutions,? J. Med. Syst., vol. 43, no. 7, p. 207, 2019.

[68] M. A. Alsalem et al., ?Multiclass benchmarking framework for automated acute Leukaemia detection and classification based on BWM and group-VIKOR,? J. Med. Syst., vol. 43, no. 7, p. 212, 2019.

[69] H. Gupta and M. K. Barua, ?Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS,? J. Clean. Prod., vol. 152, pp. 242–258, 2017.

[70] H. Gupta and M. K. Barua, ?A framework to overcome barriers to green innovation in SMEs using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS,? Sci. Total Environ., vol. 633, pp. 122–139, 2018.

[71] P. You, S. Guo, H. Zhao, and H. Zhao, ?Operation Performance Evaluation of Power Grid Enterprise Using a Hybrid BWM-TOPSIS Method,? Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 2329, 2017.

[72] E. M. Almahdi, A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, M. A. Alsalem, O. S. Albahri, and A. S. Albahri, ?Mobile-Based Patient Monitoring Systems?: A Prioritisation Framework Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques,? 2019.

[73] I. Masudin and M. G. F. Ayni, ?Pengambilan Keputusan Multi Kriteria: Kajian Teoritis Metode dan Pendekatan Dalam Pemilihan Pemasok,? J. Ilm. Tek. Ind., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 1, 2018.

[74] W. N. K. Wan Ahmad, J. Rezaei, S. Sadaghiani, and L. A. Tavasszy, ?Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using Best Worst Method,? J. Clean. Prod., vol. 153, pp. 242–252, 2017.

[75] S. Ghaffari, A. Arab, J. Nafari, and M. Manteghi, ?Investigation and evaluation of key success factors in technological innovation development based on BWM,? Decis. Sci. Lett., vol. 6, pp. 295–306, 2017.

[76] O. Bataineh, D. A. Hjeelah, and S. Arabiat, ?Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using AHP to Select the Best CAD Software,? in International Conference on Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry, 2017, pp. 106–115.

[77] N. Jaini and S. Utyuzhnikov, ?A Fuzzy Trade-Off Ranking Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making,? Axioms, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1, 2017.

[78] M. A. Qader, B. B. Zaidan, A. A. Zaidan, S. K. Ali, M. A. Kamaluddin, and W. B. Radzi, ?A methodology for football players selection problem based on multi-measurements criteria analysis,? Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 111, pp. 38–50, 2017.

[79] K. N., Z. A.A., Z. B.B., S. O.H., H. M., and A. O.S., ?Based on Real Time Remote Health Monitoring Systems:A New Approach for Prioritization ?Large Scales Data‘ Patients with Chronic Heart Diseases Using Body Sensors and Communication Technology,? J. Med. Syst., vol. 42, no. 4, p. 69, 2018.

[80] E. M. Almahdi, A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, M. A. Alsalem, O. S. Albahri, and A. S. Albahri, ?Mobile-based patient monitoring systems: A prioritisation framework using multi-criteria decision-making techniques,? J. Med. Syst.,  vol. 43, no. 7, p. 219, 2019.

[81] Musaab Alaa et al., ?Assessment and Ranking Framework for the English Skills of Pre service Teachers based on Fuzzy Delphi and TOPSIS Methods,? IEEE Access, 2019.

[82] A. S. Albahri et al., ?Based Multiple Heterogeneous Wearable Sensors?: A Smart Real-Time Health Monitoring Structured for Hospitals Distributor,? IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 37269–37323, 2019.

[83] B. Margret, ?Teaching speaking skills in english language to engineering students using language lab technology,? 2010 Int. Conf. Technol. Educ. T4E 2010, pp. 224–225, 2010.

[84] V. Ii, ?Use of Various Activities to Enhance Speaking Skill of Engineering Students,? vol. II, no. I, 2016.

[85] A. Kukulska-hulme, ?The Role of a Mobile App for Listening Comprehen- sion Training in Distance Learning to Sustain Student Motivation,? vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1327–1338, 2015.

[86] A. P. Gilakjani and N. B. Sabouri, ?Learners‘ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review,? English Lang. Teach., vol. 9, no. 6, p. 123, 2016.

[87] S. Nazara, ?Students ‘ Perception on EFL Speaking Skill Development,? Rev. Lit. Arts Am., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–43, 2011.

[88] M. T. Yeganeh and P. Malekzadeh, ?The Effect of Bilingualism on the Developing of English Reading Skill,? Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 192, pp. 803–810, 2015.

[89] L. T. Tuan, ?Enhancing EFL learners‘ writing skill via journal writing,? English Lang. Teach., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 81–88, 2010.

[90] E. Faliyanti and M. Arlin, ?THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS‘HABIT IN WATCHING ENGLISH MOVIE AND VOCABULARY MASTERY AT THE SIXTH SEMESTER AT ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM IN MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF METRO,? Intensive J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 94–102, 2018.

[91] A. Rodziah, S. M. Hasan, A. Rusli, and C. Noraini, ?Integrated Model for E-Learning Acceptance,? in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, vol. 105, no. 1, p. 12016.

[92] N. Rhodin, ?Degree Project in English and Learning The influence of ICT on learners ‘ motivation towards learning English,? 2016.

[93] J. Lu, Z. Mao, M. Wang, and L. Hu, ?Current Issues in Tourism Goodbye maps , hello apps?? Exploring the influential determinants of travel app adoption,? vol. 3500, no. September, 2015.

[94] M. Talal, A. A. Z. B. B. Zaidan, O. S. A. M. A. Alsalem, and A. S. A. A. H. Alamoodi, Comprehensive review and analysis of anti ? malware apps for smartphones, no. 0123456789. Springer US, 2019.

[95] D. Karabasevic, D. Stanujkic, S. Urosevic, G. Popovic, and M. Maksimovic, ?An Approach to Criteria Weights Determination by Integrating the DELPHI and the Adapted SWARA Methods,? Manag. J. Sustain. Bus. Manag. Solut. Emerg. Econ., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 15–25, 2017.

[96] Y. Wu, ?Applying of Listening Strategies in English as a Foreign Language,? in Proceedings of The Fifth International Conference on Law, Language and Discourse, 2015, p. 119.

[97] A. Khamkhien, ?Teaching English Speaking and English Speaking Tests in the Thai Context?: A Reflection from Thai Perspective,? vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 184–190, 2005.

[98] E. Java, ?COGNITIVE DOMAINS FOUND ON SPEAKING SKILL QUESTIONS USED IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEXTBOOK,? pp. 38–42.

[99] D. Wang, ?Research on the New Mode of College English Teaching based on Interactive Teaching and Flip-up Classroom,? vol. 87, no. Icemeet 2016, pp. 729–732, 2017.

[100] K. Hyland, ?Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing,? J. Second Lang. Writ., vol. 22, no.3, pp. 240–253, 2013.

[101] B. T. Wang, C. W. Teng, and H. T. Chen, ?Using iPad to Facilitate English Vocabulary Learning,? vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 100–104, 2015.

[102] K. LeBeau, L. G. Huey, and M. Hart, ?Assessing the Quality of Mobile Apps Used by Occupational Therapists: Evaluation Using the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale,? JMIR mHealth uHealth, vol. 7, no. 5, p. e13019, 2019.

[103] R. Larsen, ?Gamified Mobile Application to Raise Awareness and Support Energy Efficient Behavior,? no. June, 2018.

[104] D. D. M. Dolawattha, H. K. S. Premadasa, and P. M. Jayaweera, ?Modelling the Learner ‘ s Perspectives on Mobile Learning in Higher Education,? 2018 18th Int. Conf. Adv. ICT Emerg. Reg., pp. 133–141, 2018.

[105] O. S. Albahri, A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, M. Hashim, A. S. Albahri, and M. A. Alsalem, ?Real-Time Remote HealthMonitoring Systems in a Medical Centre?: A Review of the Provision of Healthcare Services-Based Body Sensor Information , Open Challenges and Methodological Aspects,? 2018.

[106] M. Daumer, U. Held, K. Ickstadt, M. Heinz, S. Schach, and G. Ebers, ?Reducing the probability of false positive research findings by pre-publication validation–experience with a large multiple sclerosis database,? BMC Med. Res. Methodol., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 18, 2008

[107] M. Dallachiesa, B. Nushi, K. Mirylenka, and T. Palpanas, ?Uncertain time-series similarity: Return to the basics,? Proc. VLDB Endow., vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1662–1673, 2012.

[108] E. Y. Mulyanah, ?THE EFFECT OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING ON STUDENTS ‘ SPEAKING SKILL,? vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67–75, 2018.

[109] M. Bojovic, ?Reading Skills and Reading Comprehension in English for Specific Purposes,? no. September, 2010.

[110] I. Bagus, N. Mantra, I. Ayu, M. Sri, and C. Author, ?Developing Communicative English Language Tests for Tourism Vocational High School Students,? vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 58–64, 2017.

[111] L. P. Ximenes, C. F. Guterres, and S. Pereira, ?A STUDY ON THE ABILITY OF 4 th SEMESTER STUDENTS ‘ WRITING SKILL OF ENGLISH STUDY PROGRAM IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2018,? vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 155–164, 2019.

[112] S. Afrin, ?Writing problems of non-English major undergraduate students in Bangladesh: An observation,?Open J. Soc. Sci., vol. 4, no. 03, p. 104, 2016.

[113] I. M. Alfaki, ?Vocabulary input in English language teaching: Assessing the vocabulary load in spine five,? Int. J. English Lang. Linguist. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–14,2015.

[114] Y. Benajiba, P. Rosso, L. Abouenour, O. Trigui, K. Bouzoubaa, and L. Belguith, ?Question answering,? in Natural Language Processing of Semitic Languages, Springer, 2014, pp. 335–370. 

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.