UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| The purpose of the study was to develop and validate an authentic assessment module to assess
higher order thinking skills. This study used Collect-Relate-Create-Donates (CRCD) model by Ben
Shneiderman as the basis for the contents of the module. The module was developed by using
ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) model. This
module underwent validation process using Fleiss' Kappa agreement coefficient by eight
experts. This study was also designed to determine the effect of the module towards higher
order thinking skills (HOTS) amongst the students in terms of their reasoning and problem
solving. A sample of 30 students was selected from a secondary school in Selangor. This study
involved the administration of pre- and post-tests on the 30 form four Biology students. The module
was conducted during Biology lesson for 12 weeks. The validation showed that Fleiss' Kappa
agreement coefficient for face validation is 0.63 which is at substantial agreement and
0.89 (almost perfect agreement) for content validation. The students were given pre- and post-tests
which consisted of HOTS items adapted from Examinations Syndicate. The pre- and post-tests also
included items that measured the students' ability in problem-solving and reasoning. The data
showed that the mean for the post-test (M = 21.20; SD = 4.96) was higher than the mean for pre-test
(M = 12.07; SD = 3.59). Hence, the data showed that there was an increase in mean scores of the
post-test compared to the pre-test. Students have shown improvement in HOTS after using the
module. In conclusion, the authentic assessment module was effective in enhancing
students' ability in HOTS particularly in reasoning and problem-solving. This implicates
that the use of the authentic assessment module can be expanded to
form four students in other schools to assess their higher order thinking skills.
|
| References |
Abdullah, A., & Peters, R. F. (2015). Malaysia’s Post-PISA2012 Direction. International Journal of Culture and History (EJournal), 1(1), 15–20.
Aitken, N., & Pungur, L. (2005). Literature Synopsis?: Authentic Assessment. Program, 1–8.
Allen, M. J. (2008). Developing and Using Rubrics for Assessing , Grading , and Improving Student Learning. Learning, 1–16.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). a Taxonomy for Learning , Teaching and Assessing a Revision of Bloom ´ S Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
Ariffin, S. R., Abd Majid, R., Haron, Z., Idris, R., Alias, A., Samsuri, S., … Abdul Hamid, N. A. (1989). Kemahiran pemikiran kritikal dan penyelesaian masalah pelajar- pelajar sains di malaysia.
Azmah, N., Yusuff, N., Rahaman, N. M., Abdullah, N., Ridzuan, P. D., Kebangsaan, S., … Selangor, K. (2014). Primary school pupils’ acquisition of science process skills via hands-on activities and authentic assessment 1, 3, 4(1), 15–28.
Baker, E. L. (1989). Higher order assessment and indicator of learning.
Bartlett, J. (2015). Outstanding Assessment For Learning In the Classroom. Routeledge.
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The Characteristics of Formative Assessment. Science Education, 85(5), 536–553.
Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning.
Biggs, J. (1999). What the Student Does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75.
Biggs, J., & Consultant, E. (2002). Constructive Alignment in Action?: Imaginative Curriculum Symposium Monday 4 th November 2002 ALIGNING THE CURRICULUM TO PROMOTE GOOD LEARNING Professor John Biggs, (November), 1–7.
Black, P. (2003). Everyday Assessment in the Science Classroom. National Science Teachers Association.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2),
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design?: The ADDIE Aproach.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in your classroom.
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading.
Chap, L. S., & Kim, C. M. (2013). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Penyelidikan. In Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan (pp. 167–183). Mc Graw Hill Education.
Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149–166.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 523–545.
Dietel, R. J., Herman, J. L., & Knuth, R. a. (1991). What does research say about assessment? North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
Earl, L. (2003). Assessment of Learning, for Learning, and as Learning. Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximise Student Learning.
Frey, B. B. (2013). Modern Classroom Assessment.
Frey, B. B. (2014). Authentic Assessment. Modern Classroom Assessment, 199–234.
Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(2), 1–18.
Ghazali Darusalam dan Sufean Hussin. (2016). Metodologi Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan.
Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (1998). Higher Order Thinking Skills • Definition • Teaching Strategies • Assessment. Thinking, 18, 458.
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Group, A. R. (2002). Assessment for learning 10 principles. Assessment Reform Group, 1– 3.
Guides, S., & Choice, W. (2011). Rubric Basics, 3–4.
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. a. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86.
HOTS – Assessment Weekly KPPM meeting. (2013), (May).
Houghton, W. (2004). Constructive Alignment - And why it is important to the learning process. Engineering Subject Centre Guide: Learning and Teaching Theory for Engineering Academics, 25–46.
Idris, A. R., Haji Ahmad, H., Hussin, S., Ghavifekr, S., & Ibrahim, M. S. (2014). Analisis Strategik Dasar Pendidikan. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Lembaga Peperiksaan. (2013). Pentaksiran KBAT.
Lewis, M., & Wray, D. (1997). Extending Literacy: Developing Approaches to Non- Fiction.
Lorna, E., & Katz, S. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind. Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning.
Malaysia Education Blueprint, M. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025. Education, 27(1), 1–268. h
Malaysian Examination Syndicate. (2007). Perealisasian Item.
McAlister, B. (2000). The authenticity of authentic assessment. What the research says... or doesn’t say. Using Authentic Assessment in Vocational Education, 19–32.
McDavitt, D. S. (1994). Teaching for Understanding: Attaining Higher Order Learning and Increased Achievement through Experiential Instruction., 79.
Mcgriff, S. J. (2000). Instructional System Design ( ISD ): Using the ADDIE Model. Instructional Systems, College of Education, Penn State University, 2.
Mohamed, R., & Lebar, O. (2017). Authentic assessment in assessing higher order thinking skills. International Journal Of Academic Research In Business And Social Sciences, 7(2), 466–476.
Mokhtar, M. H. (2016). Pentaksiran Pendidikan Teori dan Praktis.
Mueller, J. (2005). The Authentic Assessment Toolbox?: Enhancing Student Learning through Online Faculty Development. Merlot Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 1(1), 7.
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2007). educational assessment of students (5th ed.).
Norris, S. P., & Ennis, R. H. (1989). Evaluating Critical Thinking. The Practitioners’ Guide to Teaching Thinking Series.
PADU. (2015). Buletin ANJAKAN?: Buletin Transformasi Pendidikan Malaysia. n Pelajaran Malaysia, MAC, 2.
Piaw, C. Y. (2014a). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan Buku 2. Malaysia: Mc Graw Hill Education.
Piaw, C. Y. (2014b). Kaedah Penyelidikan (edisi keti). Shah Alam, Malaysia: Mc Graw Hill Education.
Poor, E. (2005). Rubrics for Assessment. Assessment.
Popham, W. J. (1997). What’s wrong and what’s right with rubrics. Pritchard, A. (2014). Ways of Learning.
R. Kilbane, C. (Otterbein U., & B. Milman, N. (George W. U. (2014). teaching models. Pearson Education.
Rajendran, N. . (2013). Teaching & Acquiring Higher-Order Thinking Skills Theory and Practice. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448.
Reich, J., & Daccord, T. (2009). The “Day in the Life of a Teenage Hobo” Project: Integrating Technology with Shneiderman’s Collect-Relate-Create- Donate Framework. Social Education.
S. Supramani. (2006). Penyoalan Guru: Pemangkin Pemikiran Aras Tinggi Murid. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti Malaya, 225–247.
Stevens, D. D. (2013). Introduction To Rubrics (second edi). Stylus Publishing,LLC.
Whitlock, B., & Nanavati, J. (2013). A systematic approach to performative and authentic assessment. Reference Services Review, 41(1), 32–48.
Wolf, K., & Stevens, E. (2007). The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 3–14.
Wyatt-Smith, C., & Klenowski, V. (2014). Assessment for Education?: Standards, Judgement and Moderation. SAGE.
Yin Peen, T., & Yusof Arshad, M. (2014). Teacher and student questions: A case study in Malaysian secondary school problem-based learning. Asian Social Science, 10(4), 174–182.
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |