UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :BF Psychology
Main Author :Razmawaty Mohamed
Title :Development and validation of authentic assessment to assess higher order thinking skills
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :2020
Notes :pedagogi
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
The purpose of the study was to develop and validate an authentic assessment module to assess  higher order thinking skills. This study used Collect-Relate-Create-Donates (CRCD) model by Ben  Shneiderman as the basis for the contents of the module. The module   was   developed   by   using    ADDIE   (Analysis,   Design,   Development, Implementation,  and  Evaluation)  model.  This   module  underwent  validation  process using  Fleiss'  Kappa  agreement  coefficient  by  eight   experts.  This  study  was  also designed  to determine the effect of  the module towards higher  order thinking skills (HOTS)  amongst  the  students  in  terms  of  their  reasoning  and  problem   solving.  A sample of 30 students was selected from a secondary school in Selangor. This study  involved the administration of pre- and post-tests on the 30 form four Biology students. The module  was conducted during Biology lesson for 12 weeks. The validation showed that  Fleiss'  Kappa   agreement  coefficient  for  face  validation  is  0.63  which  is  at substantial agreement and  0.89 (almost perfect agreement) for content validation. The students were given pre- and post-tests  which consisted of HOTS items adapted from Examinations Syndicate. The pre- and post-tests also  included items that measured the students' ability in problem-solving and reasoning. The data  showed that the mean for the post-test (M = 21.20; SD = 4.96) was higher than the mean for pre-test  (M = 12.07; SD = 3.59). Hence, the data showed that there was an increase in mean scores of the  post-test compared to the pre-test. Students have shown improvement in HOTS after using  the   module.  In  conclusion,  the  authentic  assessment  module  was  effective  in enhancing   students'  ability in  HOTS  particularly  in  reasoning  and  problem-solving. This implicates  that the use of the authentic assessment module can be expanded to form four students in other schools to assess their higher order thinking skills.  

References

Abdullah, A., & Peters, R. F. (2015). Malaysia’s Post-PISA2012 Direction. International

Journal of Culture and History (EJournal), 1(1), 15–20.

 

Aitken, N., & Pungur, L. (2005). Literature Synopsis?: Authentic Assessment. Program, 1–8.

 

Allen,  M.  J.  (2008).  Developing  and  Using  Rubrics  for  Assessing  ,  Grading  ,  and 

Improving Student Learning. Learning, 1–16.

 

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). a Taxonomy for Learning , Teaching and Assessing a 

Revision of Bloom ´ S Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.

 

Ariffin, S. R., Abd Majid, R., Haron, Z., Idris, R., Alias, A., Samsuri, S., … Abdul Hamid,

N. A. (1989). Kemahiran pemikiran kritikal dan penyelesaian masalah pelajar- pelajar sains di 

malaysia.

 

Azmah, N., Yusuff, N., Rahaman, N. M., Abdullah, N., Ridzuan, P. D., Kebangsaan, S.,

… Selangor, K. (2014). Primary school pupils’ acquisition of science process skills via hands-on 

activities and authentic assessment 1, 3, 4(1), 15–28.

 

Baker, E. L. (1989). Higher order assessment and indicator of learning.

 

Bartlett, J. (2015). Outstanding Assessment For Learning In the Classroom. Routeledge. 

 

Bell,  B.,  &  Cowie,  B.  (2001).  The  Characteristics  of  Formative  Assessment.  Science

Education, 85(5), 536–553.

 

Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning.

 

Biggs, J. (1999). What the Student Does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research 

& Development, 18(1), 57–75.

 

Biggs,  J.,  &  Consultant,  E.  (2002).  Constructive  Alignment  in  Action?:  Imaginative 

Curriculum   Symposium   Monday   4   th   November   2002   ALIGNING   THE CURRICULUM   TO   

PROMOTE   GOOD   LEARNING   Professor   John   Biggs, (November), 1–7.

 

Black,  P.  (2003).  Everyday  Assessment  in  the  Science  Classroom.  National  Science Teachers 

Association.

 

Black,  P.,  &  Wiliam,  D.  (1998).  Inside  the  Black  Box:  Raising  Standards  Through 

Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2),

 

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design?: The ADDIE Aproach.

 

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in your classroom.

 

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading.

 

Chap,  L.  S.,  &  Kim,  C.  M.  (2013).  Kesahan  dan  Kebolehpercayaan  Penyelidikan.  In

Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan (pp. 167–183). Mc Graw Hill Education.

 

Dann,  R.  (2014).  Assessment  as  learning:  Blurring  the  boundaries  of  assessment  and 

learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 

21(2), 149–166.

 

Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context.

Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 523–545.

 

Dietel,  R.  J.,  Herman,  J.  L.,  &  Knuth,  R.  a.  (1991).  What  does  research  say  about 

assessment? North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

 

Earl, L. (2003). Assessment of Learning, for Learning, and as Learning.  Assessment as Learning: 

Using Classroom Assessment to Maximise Student Learning.

 

Frey, B. B. (2013). Modern Classroom Assessment.

 

Frey, B. B. (2014). Authentic Assessment. Modern Classroom Assessment, 199–234. 

 

Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment.

Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(2), 1–18.

 

Ghazali   Darusalam   dan   Sufean   Hussin.   (2016).   Metodologi   Penyelidikan   dalam 

Pendidikan.

 

Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (1998). Higher Order Thinking Skills • Definition • Teaching Strategies • 

Assessment. Thinking, 18, 458.

 

Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills. SAGE Publications Ltd.

 

Group, A. R. (2002). Assessment for learning 10 principles. Assessment Reform Group, 1– 3.

 

Guides, S., & Choice, W. (2011). Rubric Basics, 3–4.

 

Gulikers,  J.  T.  M.,  Bastiaens,  T.  J.,  &  Kirschner,  P.  a.  (2004).  A  five-dimensional 

framework   for   authentic   assessment.   Educational   Technology   Research   and Development, 

52(3), 67–86.

 

HOTS – Assessment Weekly KPPM meeting. (2013), (May).

 

Houghton, W. (2004). Constructive Alignment - And why it is important to the learning process.  

Engineering  Subject  Centre  Guide:  Learning  and  Teaching  Theory  for Engineering Academics, 

25–46.

 

Idris, A. R., Haji Ahmad, H., Hussin, S., Ghavifekr, S., & Ibrahim, M. S. (2014). Analisis 

Strategik Dasar Pendidikan. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

 

Lembaga Peperiksaan. (2013). Pentaksiran KBAT.

 

Lewis,  M.,  &  Wray,  D.  (1997).  Extending  Literacy:  Developing  Approaches  to  Non- Fiction.

 

Lorna,  E.,  &  Katz,  S.  (2006).  Rethinking  classroom  assessment  with  purpose  in  mind.

Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning.

 

Malaysia  Education  Blueprint,  M.  (2013).  Malaysia  Education  Blueprint  2013  -  2025.

Education, 27(1), 1–268. h

 

Malaysian Examination Syndicate. (2007). Perealisasian Item.

 

McAlister, B. (2000). The authenticity of authentic assessment. What the research says... or 

doesn’t say. Using Authentic Assessment in Vocational Education, 19–32.

 

McDavitt, D. S. (1994). Teaching for Understanding: Attaining Higher Order Learning and Increased 

Achievement through Experiential Instruction., 79.

 

Mcgriff,  S.  J.  (2000).  Instructional  System  Design  (  ISD  ):  Using  the  ADDIE  Model.

Instructional Systems, College of Education, Penn State University, 2.

 

Mohamed, R., & Lebar, O. (2017). Authentic assessment in assessing higher order thinking skills. 

International Journal Of Academic Research In Business And Social Sciences, 7(2), 466–476.

 

Mokhtar, M. H. (2016). Pentaksiran Pendidikan Teori dan Praktis.

 

Mueller,  J.  (2005).  The  Authentic  Assessment  Toolbox?:  Enhancing  Student  Learning through  

 Online   Faculty   Development.   Merlot   Journal   of   Online   Learning   & Teaching, 1(1), 7.

 

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2007). educational assessment of students (5th ed.). 

 

Norris,  S.  P.,  &  Ennis,  R.  H.  (1989).  Evaluating  Critical  Thinking.  The  Practitioners’

Guide to Teaching Thinking Series.

 

PADU.   (2015).   Buletin   ANJAKAN?:   Buletin   Transformasi   Pendidikan   Malaysia.

n Pelajaran Malaysia, MAC, 2.

 

Piaw,  C.  Y.  (2014a).  Asas  Statistik  Penyelidikan  Buku  2.  Malaysia:  Mc  Graw  Hill

Education.

 

Piaw, C. Y. (2014b). Kaedah Penyelidikan (edisi keti). Shah Alam, Malaysia: Mc Graw Hill Education.

 

Poor, E. (2005). Rubrics for Assessment. Assessment.

 

Popham, W. J. (1997). What’s wrong and what’s right with rubrics. Pritchard, A. (2014). Ways of 

Learning.

 

R. Kilbane, C. (Otterbein U., & B. Milman, N. (George W. U. (2014). teaching models. Pearson 

Education.

 

Rajendran, N. . (2013). Teaching & Acquiring Higher-Order Thinking Skills Theory and Practice. 

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Reddy,  Y.  M.,  &  Andrade,  H.  (2010).  A  review  of  rubric  use  in  higher  education.

Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448.

 

Reich,  J.,  &  Daccord,  T.  (2009).  The  “Day  in  the  Life  of  a  Teenage  Hobo”  Project: 

Integrating    Technology    with    Shneiderman’s    Collect-Relate-Create-    Donate Framework. 

Social Education.

 

S. Supramani. (2006). Penyoalan Guru: Pemangkin Pemikiran Aras Tinggi Murid. Jurnal Pendidikan 

Universiti Malaya, 225–247.

 

Stevens, D. D. (2013). Introduction To Rubrics (second edi). Stylus Publishing,LLC.

 

Whitlock, B., & Nanavati, J. (2013). A systematic approach to performative and authentic 

assessment. Reference Services Review, 41(1), 32–48.

 

Wolf, K., & Stevens, E. (2007). The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. 

The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 3–14.

 

Wyatt-Smith,  C.,  &  Klenowski,  V.  (2014).  Assessment  for  Education?:  Standards, Judgement 

and Moderation. SAGE.

 

Yin Peen, T., & Yusof Arshad, M. (2014). Teacher and student questions: A case study in Malaysian  

secondary  school  problem-based  learning.  Asian  Social  Science,  10(4),

174–182.

 

 

 

 

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)