UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan aras soalan Matematik tingkatan empat yang
bersesuaian berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom dalam menggalakkan murid
berkomunikasi secara efektif dan produktif. Kajian kualitatif ini melibatkan tiga orang
murid tingkatan empat di sebuah sekolah di daerah Seremban. Kaedah pemerhatian
melalui rakaman video merupakan kaedah utama bagi pengumpulan data primer. Nota
lapangan dan hasil kerja murid juga diambil kira sebagai data sekunder bagi
melengkapkan data video. Data video dianalisis dengan menggunakan model wacana
Sfard dan Kieran. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa aras soalan berdasarkan
Taksonomi Bloom memainkan peranan yang penting dalam menggalakkan komunikasi
antara murid. Dua kategori komunikasi dikenal pasti. Kategori pertama melibatkan aras
aplikasi dan analisis di mana murid terlibat secara efektif dan produktif dalam
komunikasi matematik ketika berinteraksi sesame mereka. Sebaliknya kategori kedua
melibatkan aras pengetahuan dan kefahaman di mana murid tidak terlibat dalam
komunikasi matematik semasa berinteraksi sesame mereka. Kesimpulannya, aras
soalan aplikasi dan analisis akan dapat menggalakkan komunikasi efektif dan produktif
dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Matematik. Implikasinya, penggunaan aras soalan
aplikasi dan analisis amat penting dalam membentuk murid untuk berkomunikasi
secara efektif dan produktif sewaktu pembelajaran Matematik dalam bilik darjah. |
References |
Asikin. M. (2001). Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) : Paradigma baru pembelajaran matematika. Makalah (Online). Tersedia : //http:www.eduksionline. info/ (20 Januari 2012).
Ahmad Esa, Baharom Mohamad, Jamaluddin Hashim, Mohd Yusop Ab Hadi & Sarebah Warman. (2009). Komunikasi dalam matematik di kalangan kanakkanak. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains dan Teknologi, UTHM.
Andreas Ryve. (2006). Approaching Mathematical Discourse : Two analytical framework and their relation to problem solving interactions. Malardalen University Press Dissertations : No. 30.
Artzt, A. F. & Armour Thomas, E. (1999). A cognitive model for examining teachers’ instructional practice in mathematics : a guide for facilitating teacher reflection. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40 (3), 211-235.
Aziz Naim. (2002). Pendekatan bahasa murid dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik. Berita Matematik, 51, 2-8.
Aziz Omar, Sabri Ahmad & Tengku Zawawi Tengku Zainal. (2006). Isu-isu dalam pendidikan matematik. Kuala Lumpur. Utusan Publications & Distributions Sdn Bhd.
Barwell, R. (2005). Integrating language and content : Issues from the mathematics classroom. Linguistics and Education, 16(2), 205- 218.
Brenner, M.E. (1994). A communication framework for mathematics : exemplary instruction for culturally different students. Language & learning : Education linguistics diverse students. Albany:SUNY Press.
Bloom, B. B.,Masia, B. B. & Krathwohl, D. (1964). Taxanomy of educational objectives: the cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company Inc.
Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative Research for Education : An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
Bottorff, J. L. (1994). Using videotaped recordings in qualitative research. In Moise, J (Ed), Critical issues in qualitative research methods, (pp. 244-261). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
Catherine, C. Stein. (2007). Promoting mathematical discourse in the classroom. Mathematics Teacher (NCTM). Vol. 101, No 4.
Catherine D. Bruce. (2007). Student interaction in the math classroom : stealing ideas or building understanding. Research Monograph. Ontorio.
Catherine Marshall & Gretchen B. Rossman. (1995). Designing Qualitative Reseacrh. Sage Publications : 2???? Edition.
Chazan, D. (2000). Beyond formulas in mathematics and teaching : Dynamics of the high school algebra classroom. New York, NY : Teachers College Press.
Cheah, U. H. (2007). Conceptualizing a framework for mathematics communication in Malaysia primary schools. Third APEC – Tsukuba International Conference : Innovation of classroom teaching and learning through lesson study- focusing on mathematical communication, Tokyo and Kanazawa, Japan, 1-8.
Clement, M. A. (1999). Language aspects of mathematical modelling in primary school. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference of the Department of Science and Mathematics Education. Gadong : ETC Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
Cobb, P. & Whitenack, J. W. (1996). A method for conducting longitudinal analyses of classroom video recordings and transcripts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30 (3), 213-228.
David Clarke & Peter Sullivan. (1991). Communication in the classroom: The importance of good questioning. Deakin University.
David Tall & Mohamad Rashidi Razali. (1991). Diagnosing students’ difficulties in learning mathematics. Coventry : University of Warwick.
Gagne, R. (1985). The Conditions Of Learning (4th ed.). New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Garofalo, J. & Lester, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 16(3). 163- 176.
Gizem Karnali. (2011). An enaluative calculus project : Applying Bloom’s Taxonomy to the calculus classroom. PRIMUS, 21(8), 721-733. Taylor & Francis Group.
Good, T. L. (1988). Obseravtional research grounding theory in classrooms. Educational Psychologist, 23(4), 375-379.
Griffee, D. T. (2005). Research tips : Classroom observation data collection, part II. Journal of Development Education, 29(2), 36-37.
Hatano, G. & Inagaki, K. (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In L. Resnick, J. Levine & S. Teasley (Eds.). Perspective on socially shared cognition. (331-348). Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
Harold, L. Scheon. (2003). Teaching mathematics through problem solving : grades 6- 12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a maths-talk community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35. 81-116.
Johari Hassan & Norsuriani Ab Aziz. (n.d). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minat terhadap matematik di kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah. Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM.
Johnston, J. S. (2009). What does the skill of observation look like in a young children? International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2511-2525.
John R. Kirby & N. H. Williams. (1991). Learning Problems : A cognitive approach . Kagan & Woo Ltd (1768).
Jonathan Wolff. (2009). Cognitive Disability In A Society of Equals. Volume 40 Issue 3-4. September 2009.
Jorgensen, Danny L. (1989). Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies, Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications.
Kamaludin Ahmad. (1996). Modul Pengajaran Matematik Sekolah Rendah :Pengajaran Pemusatan Murid dan Berasaskan Konstruktivisme. Maktab Perguruan Mohd Khalid, Johor Bharu.
Karnowski & Cramer. (1995). The informal language in respecting mathematics idea. Teaching Childrens Mathematics. NCTM. VOL 1. No. 6 (332- 335).
Kathleen Cotton. (n.d). Classroom questioning . North West Regional Educational Laboratory.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Dimuat turun daripada http://buletinkpm.blogspot.my/2012_04_01_archivE.html.
Keri Witherell. (2010). Communication of mathematics within cooperative learning groups. Action research project report. (MAT Degree, University of Nebraska- Lincoln, 2004).
Khalid, M. & Tengah, M. K. A. (2007). Communication in mathematics : th role of language and its consequences for English as second language students. Third APEC-Tsukuba International Conference : Innovation of classroom teaching and learning through lesson study- focusing on mathematical communication, Tokyo and Kanazawa, Japan, 1-8.
Kimberly Hirscfeld-Cotton. (2008). Mathematical communication, conseptual understanding and students’ attitudes toward mathematics .Action Research Project Report. (MATT Degree, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2008)
Kieran, C. (2001). The mathematical discourse of 13-year-old partnered problem solving and its relation to the mathematics that emerges. Educational Studies In Mathematics. 46(1-3), 187-228.
Krulik, S. (1995). Problem solving in school mathematics . Reston: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lampert, M. (1989). Choosing and using mathematical tools in classroom discourse. Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 1, pp, 223- 264). Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
Lau, P. N., Singh, P. & Hwa, T. Y. (2009). Constructing mathematics in interactive classroom context. Educational Studies in Mathematics.72 (3), 307-324. Levels & Types of Questions. (2006). Instructional Development : Center For Teaching Excellence, daripada http://www.oir.uiuc.edu/Did/does/QUESTION/quest1.html.
Lim, C. S. & Lourdusamy, A. (2001). Factors affecting students’ abilities to solve operational and word problems in mathematics. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 24(1), 84-95.
Lim, C. S. & Chew, C. M. (2007). Mathematical communication in malaysian bilingual classrooms. Third APEC – Tsukuba International Conference : Innovation of classroom teaching and learning through lesson study-focusing on mathematical communication, Tokyo & Kanazawa, Japan, 1-7.
Lindsey Shorser. (n.d). Blomm’s taxonomy interpreted for mathematics, from www.coun.uvie.ca/learning/exams/blooms-taxonomy.html Mack, N., Woodsong, C., Macqueen, K. M., Guest, G. & Naney, E. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods: A data collector’s field guide. Family Health International, North Carolina , USa.
Maimun, A. L. (2010). The Effectiveness of Strategies And Techniques In Teaching And Learning Islamic Education. International Conference on Education and Educational Technologies, 218-223.
Maher, C. A. (2002). How students structure their own investigations and educate us: What we have learned from a fourteen year study. In A.D Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.).Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME26). University of East Anglia.
Mansor Ahmad Saman, Razali Mohamad & Shawaludin Anis. (1984). Pengantar komunikasi. Penerbit USM. Pengajian Ilmu Kemanusiaan.
Mariana M. Petkova. (2009). Classroom discourse and teacher talk influences on English Lamguage learner students’ mathematics experiences. Graduate School Thesis and Dissertations, University of South Florida.
Mary E. Brenner. (1998). Development of mathematical communication in problem solving groups by language minority students. Bilingual Research Journal.22:2, 3-4, Spring, Summer & Fall.
Martin, L. C. (1999). The nature of the folding back phenomenon within the Pirie- Kieran theory for the growth of mathrematical understanding and the associated implications for teachers and learners of mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford, UK.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE). (2003). Mathematics for Integrated Curriculum for Secondary School : Curriculum specification Form 2. KL: Curriculum Development Centre.
Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah & Paola Iannone. (2010). Analysis of classroom interaction from the combined view of self-regulating strategies and discourse analysis : What can we learn?.Proceedings of the British Congress For Mathematics Education.
Mok Soon Sang. (1996). Pedagogi 2 : Perlaksanaan Pengajaran. Subang Jaya, Selangor : Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd.
Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar. (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan Skudai: Penerbitan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Morgan, J. C. & Schreiber, J. E. (1969). How to ask questions. Washington, DC. National Council for the Social Studies. (ERIC Document No. ED033887).
Muhammad Yusof Arshad & Fatimah Zaharah Seman. (2011). Analisis item soalan matematik Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia tahun 2003- 2006 mengikut domain kognitif Taksonomi Bloom. Journal of Science & Mathematics Educational , Volume 2, 39-50. Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA : NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA : NCTM.
National Research Council. (2001). Communication in math. From www.nctm.org/Handlers/AttachmentHandler.ashx?attachmentID
Newman, A. (1997). Strategies for Diagnosis and Remediation. Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanich.
Noraini Idris. (1999). Linguistics Aspects of Mathematics Education. Gadong : ETC University Brunie Darussalam.
Noor Shah Saad. (2005). Pengajaran Matematik Sekolah Rendah & Menengah : Teori dan Pengkaedahan. Petaling Jaya : Harmoni Publication & Distributions Sdn Bhd.
OECD. (2004). OECD of Principles of Corporate Governance. Organisation For Economic Co-Operation and Software :1987-1996.
Ong, S. L. & Yoong, S. (2003). Membanding dimensionality ujian masalah berayat matematik. Second International Conference on Measurement and Evaluation in Education (ICMEE), 341-353. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.
Ontario . (2007). Asking effective questions. Capacity Building Series. Special edition #21
Ontario. (2010). Communication in the mathematics classroom. Capacity B uilding Series. Special Edition #13.
Pressini, D. & Bassett, J. (1996). Mathematical communication in students’ responses to a performance assessment task. In P.C. Elliot and M. J. Kenney (Eds.), 1996 yearbook: Communication in mathematics K-12 and beyond. (pp. 20-28). Reston (VA):NCTM.
Perry, N. E. (2002). Intruduction: using qualitative methods to enrich understandings of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 1-3.
Phillip, L. Groisser. (1994). How to use the Fine Art of Questioning. Teachers Parctical Press. Prentice-Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, N.J.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum, KPM. (1992). Amalan yang berkesan untuk meningkatkan prestasi dalam matematik di sekolah menengah. Keadaan masa kini (satu saranan untuk tindakan sekolah).
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2001). Mathematics for intergrated curriculum for secondary school : Curriculum Specification Form 2, KL : Curriculum Development Centre.
Pirie, S. E. B. (1996a). Classroom video-recording: when, why and how does it offer valuable data source for qualitative research? Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the North America Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Panama City, Panama.
Pimm, D. (1996). Diverse Communication. In P.C Elliot, (Ed.) 1996 yearbook : Communication in mathematics , K-12 and beyond, (pp. 11-19). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M. & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of mathematics behavior, 22(4), 405-435.
Ryve, A. (2004). Can collaborative concept mapping create mathematically productive discourses? Educational Studies in Mathematics. 56(2/3), 157-177.
Ryve, A. (2006).Making explicit the analysis of students’ mathematical discourserevisiting a newly developed methodological framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 62(2), 191-209.
Rachelle Mayo. (2007). Connection between communication and math abilities. Summative Projects for MA Degree. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Ramli Mohamad. (1984). Komunikasi Asas. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka. Redfield, D. L. & Rousseau, E. W. (1981). A meta-analysis of experimental research on teacher questioning behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 237- 245.
Sutton, C. (1999). Communication in the Classroom. Hodder and Stoughton, London.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Research Methods in (mathematics) education. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of International research in mathematics education. (pp. 435-487). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears : looking at thinking as communication to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), 13-57.
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating : Human development, the growth of discourses and mathematizing. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Sfard, A, & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication : rethinking learning-bytalking through multi-faceted analysis of students’ mathematical interactions. Mind, Culture and Activity, 8(1), 42-76.
Schuck, S. & Keaney, M. (2004). Digital video as a tool in research projects:zooming in on current issues. In L. Cantoni & C. Mcloughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of Ed- Media 2004 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, (pp.2085-2092).
Spradely, J. P. (1986). In Borg, W.R. and Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction Sth Edn. New York : Longman.
Stipek, D., Salmon, J. M., Givvin, K. B., Kazemi, E., Saxe, G. & Macgyvers, V. L. (1998). The value of practices discovering emotion:113 suggestedly motivation researched promoted by mathematics education reformers. Journal for research in mathematics education, 29, 465-488.
Sullivan, P., Clarke, DJ. & Wallbridge, M. (1991). Problem solving with conventional mathematics content : Responses of pupils to open mathematical tasks, Mathematics Teaching and Learning Centre Report No.1.
Szetela, W. & Nicol, C. (1992). Evaluating problem-solving in mathematics. Educational Leadership, 49(8), 42-45.
Turner, J. C. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics :A multi-method study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 88-106.
Wilen, W.W. (2001). Exploring myths about teacher questioning in the social studies classroom. The Social Studies, 92(1), 26-32.
Siegel, M. & Judith. (1998). Supporting students’ mathematical inquiries through reading. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 378-388. Suyitno Amin. (2004). Dasar-dasar dan Proses Pembelajaran Matematika I. Semarang : FMIPA UNNES.
Tran Vui. (2006). Enhancing classroom communication to develop students’ mathematical thinking. Universiti Hue, Vitenam.
Utari Sumarmo. (2004). Kemandirian Belajar : Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana Dikembangkan Pada Peserta Didik. Seminar Pendidikan Matematika. Vol. 8.
Zaharah Hussin. (2014). Komunikasi dalam penyelesaian masalah matematik dalam kalangan murid tingkatan empat. Tesis. Dr. Fal, Universiti Sains Malaysia. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |