|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| This study described English learners' pragmatics development, learners' pragmatics competence in the selected speech act of request as a one of the most impotence aspects of pragmatic, request strategies that they utilized in gaining pragmatic ability. The study was presented by a public curriculum lead that prioritizes the necessity for English students to develop their ability to utilize request strategies positively in academic and cultural communications. Moreover, Many English students fail to present pragmatic aspects on how to understand different strategies by relating utterances to their meanings, knowing the intention of language users, and how request strategies are utilized in specific locations. There is developing material of studies on awareness-raising of the value of pragmatic competence and request strategies for EFL schoolroom teaching. However, researchers have pointed to concentrate on the traditional methods rather than how English learners require or understand request strategies to develop the students' production of request in the EFL schoolroom. The request strategies and methods of teaching English to these Iraqi learners have been deliberated in details of the existing paper
|
| References |
[1] Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. New York: Oxford University Press. [2] Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental consideration in language testing. New York: Oxford University Press. [3] Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1997). Pragmatic awareness and instructed L2 learning: An empirical investigation. Paper presented at the AAAL 1997 Conference, Orlando. [4] Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. (1997). Beyond methods: Components of second language teacher education. New York: McGraw-Hill. [5] Bataineh, A. & Hussein, N. (2015). The effect of using webcam chat on the undergraduate EFL students' pragmatic competence. International Journal of education. ISSIN 1948- 4576. VO.7.NO .2. [6] Blum-Kulka. K. (7991.), Interlanguage Pragmatics (pp. 21-42). New York: Oxford University Press. [7] Bremner, S. (1998). Language learning strategies and language proficiency: Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. Asian Pacific Journal of Language in Education, 1(2), 490-514. [8] Byram, M. (Ed.). (2000). Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning. [9] London and New York: Routledge. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5147-5151. [10] Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to language pedagogy. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 2-27). London: Longman. [11] Cohen, A. D. (1996). Developing the ability to perform speech acts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 253-267. [12] Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59(3), 199-208. [13] Ersözlü, Z. N. (2010). Determining of the student teachers? learning and studying strategies. [14] Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59(3), 199-208. [15] Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [16] Green, J., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297. [17] Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31(3), 367-383. [18] Hill, T. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence in an EFL context. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 3905. [19] Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A. G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34(3), 399-415. [20] Hussein, N and Elttayef, A (2018). The effect of authentic materials on developing undergraduate EFL students’ communicative competence. Journal of literature, Languages and linguistic .ISSI 2422-8535. [21] Hussein, N & Albakri, I (2019). Iraqi Learners’ Problems in Learning Speech Act of Request in EFL Classroom. Journal of Education and Practice. ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222- 288X (Online) DOI: 10.7176/JEP Vol.10, No.4. [22] Hussein, N & Albakri, I (2019). The Essential Role of Teaching Pragmatic in the Iraqi EFL Classroom. Journal of Education and Practice. ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) DOI: 10.7176/JEP Vol.10, No.4, 2019. [23] Hussein, N, .Albakri, I (2019). The importance of the speech act of request in the Iraqi EFL classroom. International Journal of English Research ISSN: 2455-2186. Volume 5; Issue 2; Page No. 95-98. [24] Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B.Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), [25] Sociolinguistic (pp.269-285). Harmon sworth: Penguin. [26] Jalilifar, A. (2009). Request strategies: Cross-sectional study of Iranian EFL learners and Australian native speakers. English Language Teaching, 2,461. [27] Kasper, G. (1989). Variation in interlanguage speech act realization. In S. Gases, C. Madden, [28] Kramsch, C., & Lam, W. (1999). Textual identities: The importance of being non-native. In Braine, G. (Ed.), NonNative Educators in English Language Teaching (pp. 57-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [29] Krasner, I. (1999). The role of culture in language teaching. Dialog on Language Instruction, 13(1-2), 79-88. [30] Koike, D.A. (1989). Pragmatic competence and adult L2 acquisition: Speech acts in interlanguage. The Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 279-289. [31] Kurdghelashvili, T (2015) Speech Acts and Politeness Strategies in an EFL Classroom in Georgia. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences .Vole: 9, No: 1 [32] Leung, C (2005). Convivial communication: decontextualizing communicative competence. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vo.15, no.2, 119-144. [33] Liu, A. (2010). On pragmatic “borrowing transfer” evidence from Chinese EFL learners' compliment response behavior. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 26-44. [34] Oxford, R. L. (1993). Research on second language learning strategies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 175-187. [35] Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House. [36] Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 404-419. [37] Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in Second Languageacquisiton: Discourse and Pragmatics (pp.37-58). Clevedon and Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters. [38] Purdie, N., & Oliver, R. (1999). Language learning strategies used by bilingual school-aged children. System, 27(3), 375-388. [39] Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 117-131. [40] Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper [41] Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [42] Sheorey, R. (1999). An examination of language learning strategy use in the setting of an indigenized variety of English. System, 27(2), 173-190. [43] Shokouhi, S. (2016) An Overview on Explicit and Implicit instructions on Learners’ Pragmatic Awareness in Making Request in English. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics ISSN 2329-7034 [44] Shridhar, K., & Shridhar, S. (1986). Bridging the paradigm gap: Second language acquisition theory and indigenized varieties of English. World Englishes, 5, 3-14. [45] Tuncer, U. (2009). How do monolingual and bilingual language learners differ in use of learning strategies while learning a foreign language? Evidences from Mersin University. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 852-856 [46] Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. London, New York, Sydney: Arnold. [47] Yang, N. D. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners' beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27(4), 515-535. [48] Y?lmaz, C. (2010). The relationship between language learning strategies, gender, proficiency and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of ELT learners in Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 682-687.
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |