1. Bajwa, D.S.; Rehovsky, C.; Shojaeiarani, J.; Stark, N.; Bajwa, S.; Dietenberger, M.A. Functionalized cellulose nanocrystals: A potential fire retardant for polymer composites. Polymers 2019, 11, 1361. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Rasad, M.S.B.A.; Halim, A.S.; Hashim, K.; Rashid, A.H.A.; Yusof, N.; Shamsuddin, S. In vitro evaluation of novel chitosan derivatives sheet and paste cytocompatibility on human dermal fibroblasts. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 79, 1094–1100. [CrossRef]

3. Abdul Khalil, H.; Adnan, A.; Yahya, E.B.; Olaiya, N.; Safrida, S.; Hossain, M.; Balakrishnan, V.; Gopakumar, D.A.; Abdullah, C.; Oyekanmi, A. A Review on Plant Cellulose Nanofibre-Based Aerogels for Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 1759. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Khalil, H.A.; Tye, Y.Y.; Leh, C.P.; Saurabh, C.; Ariffin, F.; Fizree, H.M.; Mohamed, A.; Suriani, A. Cellulose

reinforced biodegradable polymer composite film for packaging applications. In Bionanocomposites for

Packaging Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 49–69.

5. Tamaddon, F.; Hosseinzadeh, S. Anionic micro-cellulose (AMC): Preparation, characterization, and application as a novel heterogeneous base catalyst. Cellulose 2018, 25, 5277–5287. [CrossRef]

6. Murphy, C.A.; Collins, M.N. Microcrystalline cellulose reinforced polylactic acid biocomposite filaments for 3D printing. Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, 1311–1320. [CrossRef]

7. Marcovich, N.E.; Auad, M.L.; Bellesi, N.E.; Nutt, S.R.; Aranguren, M.I. Cellulose micro/nanocrystals reinforced polyurethane. J. Mater. Res. 2006, 21, 870–881. [CrossRef]

8. Khalil, H.A.; Tye, Y.Y.; Chow, S.T.; Saurabh, C.K.; Paridah, M.T.; Dungani, R.; Syakir, M.I. Cellulosic pulp fiber as reinforcement materials in seaweed-based film. BioResources 2017, 12, 29–42.

9. Nosar, M.N.; Salehi, M.; Ghorbani, S.; Beiranvand, S.P.; Goodarzi, A.; Azami, M. Characterization ofwet-electrosp un cellulose acetate based 3-dimensional scaffolds for skin tissue engineering applications: Influence of cellulose acetate concentration. Cellulose 2016, 23, 3239–3248. [CrossRef]

10. Sultan, S.; Mathew, A.P. 3D Printed Porous Cellulose Nanocomposite Hydrogel Scaffolds. JoVE (J. Visual. Exp.) 2019, 146, e59401. [CrossRef]

11. Osorio, D.A.; Lee, B.E.; Kwiecien, J.M.; Wang, X.; Shahid, I.; Hurley, A.L.; Cranston, E.D.; Grandfield, K. Cross-linked cellulose nanocrystal aerogels as viable bone tissue scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2019, 87, 152–165.[CrossRef]

12. Naeem, M.A.; Alfred, M.; Lv, P.; Zhou, H.; Wei, Q. Three-dimensional bacterial cellulose-electrospun membrane hybrid structures fabricated through in-situ self-assembly. Cellulose 2018, 25, 6823–6830. [CrossRef]

13. Chung, T.-S.; Jiang, L.Y.; Li, Y.; Kulprathipanja, S. Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 483–507. [CrossRef]

14. Athukoralalage, S.S.; Balu, R.; Dutta, N.K.; Roy Choudhury, N. 3D bioprinted nanocellulose-based hydrogels for tissue engineering applications: A brief review. Polymers 2019, 11, 898. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15. Liu, W.; Du, H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, K.; Liu, H.; Xie, H.; Zhang, X.; Si, C. Bacterial Cellulose-Based Composite Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications: A Review. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 7536–7562. [CrossRef]

16. Hickey, R.J.; Pelling, A.E. Cellulose biomaterials for tissue engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 45. [CrossRef]

17. Czaja, W.K.; Young, D.J.; Kawecki, M.; Brown, R.M. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 1–12. [CrossRef]

18. Picheth, G.F.; Pirich, C.L.; Sierakowski, M.R.; Woehl, M.A.; Sakakibara, C.N.; de Souza, C.F.; Martin, A.A.; da Silva, R.; de Freitas, R.A. Bacterial cellulose in biomedical applications: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 104, 97–106. [CrossRef]

19. Rajwade, J.; Paknikar, K.; Kumbhar, J. Applications of bacterial cellulose and its composites in biomedicine. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 2491–2511. [CrossRef]

20. Bourmaud, A.; Beaugrand, J.; Shah, D.U.; Placet, V.; Baley, C. Towards the design of high-performance plant fibre composites. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 97, 347–408. [CrossRef

]21. Zhong, Y.; Kureemun, U.; Tran, L.Q.N.; Lee, H.P. Natural plant fiber composites-constituent properties and challenges in numerical modeling and simulations. Int. J. Appl. Mech. 2017, 9, 1750045. [CrossRef]

22. Bourmaud, A.; Mayer-Laigle, C.; Baley, C.; Beaugrand, J. About the frontier between filling and reinforcement by fine flax particles in plant fibre composites. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 141, 111774. [CrossRef]

23. George, J.; Sabapathi, S. Cellulose nanocrystals: Synthesis, functional properties, and applications. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2015, 8, 45–54. [CrossRef]

24. Hurtado, P.L.; Rouilly, A.; Vandenbossche, V.; Raynaud, C. A review on the properties of cellulose fibre insulation. Build. Environ. 2016, 96, 170–177. [CrossRef]

25. Mahltig, B.; Günther, K.; Askani, A.; Bohnet, F.; Brinkert, N.; Kyosev, Y.; Weide, T.; Krieg, M.; Leisegang, T. X-ray-protective organic/inorganic fiber–along the textile chain from fiber production to clothing application. J. Text. Inst. 2017, 108, 1975–1984. [CrossRef]

26. Hokkanen, S.; Bhatnagar, A.; Sillanpää, M. A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity. Water Res. 2016, 91, 156–173. [CrossRef]

27. Seabra, A.B.; Bernardes, J.S.; Fávaro, W.J.; Paula, A.J.; Durán, N. Cellulose nanocrystals as carriers in medicine and their toxicities: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 181, 514–527. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

28. Madsen, B.; Gamstedt, E.K. Wood versus plant fibers: Similarities and differences in composite applications. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 2013, 564346. [CrossRef]

29. Moon, R.J.; Martini, A.; Nairn, J.; Simonsen, J.; Youngblood, J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3941–3994. [CrossRef]

30. Huang, Y .; Wang, J.; Yang, F.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Dai, K. Modification and evaluation of micro-nanostructured porous bacterial cellulose scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol.Appl. 2017, 75, 1034–1041. [CrossRef]

31. Pacheco, G.; de Mello, C.V.; Chiari-Andréo, B.G.; Isaac, V.L.B.; Ribeiro, S.J.L.; Pecoraro, É.; Trovatti, E.Bacterial cellulose skin masks—Properties and sensory tests. J. Cosm. Dermatol. 2018, 17, 840–847. [CrossRef]

32. Mishra, R.K.; Sabu, A.; Tiwari, S.K. Materials chemistry and the futurist eco-friendly applications ofnanocellulose: Status and prospect. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2018, 22, 949–978. [CrossRef]

33. Klemm, D.; Heublein, B.; Fink, H.P.; Bohn, A. Cellulose: Fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3358–3393. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

34. De Amorim, J.D.P.; de Souza, K.C.; Duarte, C.R.; da Silva Duarte, I.; Ribeiro, F.d.A.S.; Silva, G.S.; de Farias, P.M.A.; Stingl, A.; Costa, A.F.S.; Vinhas, G.M. Plant and bacterial nanocellulose: Production, propertiesand applications in medicine, food, cosmetics, electronics and engineering. A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 851–869. [CrossRef]

35. Jozala, A.F.; de Lencastre-Novaes, L.C.; Lopes, A.M.; de Carvalho Santos-Ebinuma, V.; Mazzola, P.G.; Pessoa, A., Jr.; Grotto, D.; Gerenutti, M.; Chaud, M.V. Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: A 10-year overview. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 2063–2072. [CrossRef]

36. O’Connell, D.W.; Birkinshaw, C.; O’Dwyer, T.F. Heavy metal adsorbents prepared from the modification of cellulose: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 6709–6724. [CrossRef]

37. Borges, J.; Canejo, J.; Fernandes, S.; Brogueira, P.; Godinho, M. Cellulose-based liquid crystalline composite systems. Nanocell. Polym. Nanocompos. Fundam. Appl. Wiley Scrivener 2015, 215–235. [CrossRef]

38. Trache, D.; Hussin, M.H.; Chuin, C.T.H.; Sabar, S.; Fazita, M.N.; Taiwo, O.F.; Hassan, T.; Haafiz, M.M. Microcrystalline cellulose: Isolation, characterization and bio-composites application—A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 93, 789–804. [CrossRef]

39. Sotnikova, Y.S.; Demina, T.; Istomin, A.; Goncharuk, G.; Grandfils, C.; Akopova, T.; Zelenetskii, A.; Babayevsky, P. Application of micro-and nanocrystalline cellulose. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Moscow, Russia, 21–24 November 2017.

40. De Campos, A.; Corrêa, A.C.; Claro, P.I.C.; deMorais Teixeira, E.; Marconcini, J.M. Processing, Characterization and Application of Micro and Nanocellulose Based Environmentally Friendly Polymer Composites.In Sustainable Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1–35.

41. Wang, T.; Hong, M. Solid-state NMR investigations of cellulose structure and interactions with matrix polysaccharides in plant primary cell walls. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 503–514. [CrossRef]

42. Sorieul, M.; Dickson, A.; Hill, S.J.; Pearson, H. Plant fibre: Molecular structure and biomechanical properties, of a complex living material, influencing its deconstruction towards a biobased composite. Materials 2016, 9, 618. [CrossRef]

43. Sreekumar, P.; Manirul Haque, S.; Afzal, H.M.; Sadique, Z.; Al-Harthi, M.A. Preparation and characterization of microcellulose reinforced polyvinyl alcohol/starch biocomposites. J. Compos. Mater. 2019, 53, 1933–1939.[CrossRef]

44. Oehme, D.P.; Doblin, M.S.; Wagner, J.; Bacic, A.; Downton, M.T.; Gidley, M.J. Gaining insight into cell wall cellulose macrofibril organisation by simulating microfibril adsorption. Cellulose 2015, 22, 3501–3520. [CrossRef]

45. Kataja, M.; Haavisto, S.; Salmela, J.; Lehto, R.; Koponen, A. Characterization of micro-fibrillated cellulose fiber suspension flow using multi scale velocity profile measurements. Nord. Pulp. Pap. Res. J. 2017, 32, 473–482. [CrossRef]

46. Saputro, A.; Verawati, I.; Ramahdita, G.; Chalid, M. Preparation of micro-fibrillated cellulose based on sugar palm ijuk (Arenga pinnata) fibres through partial acid hydrolysis. In Proceedings of the IOP ConferenceSeries: Materials Science and Engineering, Medan, Indonesia, 7–10 November 2016; p. 012042.

47. Nie, K.; Song, Y.; Liu, S.; Han, G.; Ben, H.; Ragauskas, A.J.; Jiang, W. Preparation and Characterization ofMicrocellulose and Nanocellulose Fibers from Artemisia Vulgaris Bast. Polymers 2019, 11, 907. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

48. Akaraonye, E.; Filip, J.; Safarikova, M.; Salih, V.; Keshavarz, T.; Knowles, J.C.; Roy, I. Composite scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering based on natural polymers of bacterial origin, thermoplasticpoly (3–hydroxybutyrate) and micro–fibrillated bacterial cellulose. Polym. Int. 2016, 65, 780–791. [CrossRef]

49. Adel, A.M.; El-Gendy, A.A.; Diab, M.A.; Abou-Zeid, R.E.; El-Zawawy, W.K.; Dufresne, A. Microfibrillated cellulose from agricultural residues. Part I: Papermaking application. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 93, 161–174. [CrossRef]

50. El-Sakhawy, M.; Hassan, M.L. Physical and mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose prepared from agricultural residues. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 67, 1–10. [CrossRef]

51. Shi, S.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, S.; Hou, W.; Yan, Z. Evolution of Waster Cotton Fiber Hydro-Char Physicochemical Structure during Hydrothermal Carbonation. Preprints 2017, 2017, 110149. [CrossRef]

52. Ni, Z.-J.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.-N.; Lou, B.-Y.; Pan, S.; Lv, Y.; Liu, D.-L. Micro-cellulose preparation method based on urea/naoh dissolved system. Univ. Politeh. Buchar. Sci. Bull. Ser. C Elect. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2017, 79, 45–54.

53. Suryadi, H.; SUTRIYO,M.R.; LESTARI, Y.P.I. Potential of cellulase of Penicillium vermiculatum for pr eparationand characterization of microcrystalline cellulose produced from α-cellulose of kapok pericarpium (ceiba pentandra). Int. J. Appl. Pharm. 2019, 11, 92–97. [CrossRef]

54. Hou, W.; Ling, C.; Shi, S.; Yan, Z. Preparation and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from wastecotton fabrics by using phosphotungstic acid. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 123, 363–368. [CrossRef]

55. Chaerunisaa, A.Y.; Sriwidodo, S.; Abdassah, M. Microcrystalline Cellulose as Pharmaceutical Excipient.In Pharmaceutical Formulation Design-Recent Practices; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019.

56. Zugenmaier, P. Crystalline Cellulose and Derivatives: Characterization and Structures; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008.

57. Khalil, H.A.; Bhat, A.; Yusra, A.I. Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 963–979. [CrossRef]

58. Ranby, B.G. Aqueous colloidal solutions of cellulose micelles. Acta Chem. Scand. 1949, 3, 649–650. [CrossRef]

59. Mokhena, T.C.; John, M.J. Cellulose nanomaterials: New generation materials for solving global issues. Cellulose 2020, 27, 1149–1194. [CrossRef]

60. Belali, N.G.; Chaerunisaa, A.Y.; Rusdiana, T. Isolation and Characterization of Microcrystalline Cellulose Derived from Plants as Excipient in Tablet: A Review. Indones. J. Pharm. 2019, 1, 55–61. [CrossRef]

61. Colvin, J.R.; Beer, M. The formation of cellulose microfibrils in suspensions of Acetobacter xylinum. Can. J. Microbiol. 1960, 6, 631–637. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

62. Halliwell, G. Hydrolysis of fibrous cotton and reprecipitated cellulose by cellulolytic enzymes from soil micro-organisms. Biochem. J. 1965, 95, 270–281. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

63. Heyn, A. The microcrystalline structure of cellulose in cell walls of cotton, ramie, and jute fibers as revealed by negative staining of sections. J. Cell Biol. 1966, 29, 181–197. [CrossRef]

64. Toshkov, T.S.; Gospodinov, N.R.; Vidimski, E.P. Method of Producing Microcrystalline Cellulose. U.S.Patent No. 3,954,727, 4 May 1976.

65. Kobayashi, S.; Kashiwa, K.; Shimada, J.; Kawasaki, T.; Shoda, S.i. Enzymatic polymerization: The first in vitro synthesis of cellulose via nonbiosynthetic path catalyzed by cellulase. Macromol. Symp. 1992, 54, 509–518. [CrossRef]

66. Revol, J.-F.; Godbout, L.; Gray, D. Solid self-assembled films of cellulose with chiral nematic order and optically variable properties. J. Pulp Paper Sci. 1998, 24, 146–149.

67. Nakagaito, A.; Yano, H. The effect of morphological changes from pulp fiber towards nano-scale fibrillatedcellulose on the mechanical properties of high-strength plant fiber based composites. Appl. Phys. A 2004, 78,  547–552. [CrossRef]

68. Henriksson, M.; Henriksson, G.; Berglund, L.; Lindström, T. An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur. Polym. J. 2007, 43, 3434–3441. [CrossRef]

69. Nyström, G.; Mihranyan, A.; Razaq, A.; Lindström, T.; Nyholm, L.; Strømme, M. A nanocellulose polypyrrole composite based on microfibrillated cellulose from wood. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 4178–4182. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

70. Shao, Y.; Chaussy, D.; Grosseau, P.; Beneventi, D. Use of microfibrillated cellulose/lignosulfonate blends ascarbon precursors: Impact of hydrogel rheology on 3D printing. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 10575–10582. [CrossRef]

71. Alavi, M. Modifications of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC), and nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) for antimicrobial and wound healing applications. e-Polymers 2019, 19, 103–119. [CrossRef]

72. Nuryawan, A.; Abdullah, C.; Hazwan, C.M.; Olaiya, N.; Yahya, E.B.; Risnasari, I.; Masruchin, N.; Baharudin, M.; Khalid, H.; Abdul Khalil, H. Enhancement of Oil Palm Waste Nanoparticles on the Properties and Characterization of Hybrid Plywood Biocomposites. Polymers 2020, 12, 1007. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

73. Kim, J.-H.; Shim, B.S.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, Y.-J.; Min, S.-K.; Jang, D.; Abas, Z.; Kim, J. Review of nanocellulose for sustainable future materials. Int. J. Prec. Eng. Manuf. Green Technol. 2015, 2, 197–213. [CrossRef]

74. Soyek wo, F.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, R.; Qu, Y.; Lin, C.; Huang, X.; Zhu, A.; Liu, Q. Cellulose nanofiber intermediaryto fabricate highly-permeable ultrathin nanofiltration membranes for fast water purification. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 524, 174–185. [CrossRef]

75. Lee, K.-Y. Nanocellulose and Sustainability: Production, Properties, Applications, and Case Studies; CRC Press:New York, NY, USA, 2018.

76. Okahisa, Y.; Furukawa, Y.; Ishimoto, K.; Narita, C.; Intharapichai, K.; Ohara, H. Comparison of cellulose nanofiber properties produced from different parts of the oil palm tree. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 198, 313–319.[CrossRef]

77. Doench, I.; Ahn Tran, T.; David, L.; Montembault, A.; Viguier, E.; Gorzelanny, C.; Sudre, G.; Cachon, T.;  Louback-Mohamed, M.; Horbelt, N. Cellulose nanofiber-reinforced Chitosan hydrogel composites for intervertebral disc tissue repair. Biomimetics 2019, 4, 19. [CrossRef]

78. Raza, Z.; Aslam, M.; Azeem, A.; Maqsood, H. Development and characterization of nano–crystalline cellulose incorporated poly (lactic acid) composite films. Mater. Werkst. 2019, 50, 64–73. [CrossRef]

79. Abraham, E.; Weber, D.E.; Sharon, S.; Lapidot, S.; Shoseyov, O. Multifunctional cellulosic scaffolds from modified cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 2010–2015. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

80. Lu, Y.; Yu, J.; Ma, J.; Wang, Z.; Fan, Y.; Zhou, X. High-yield preparation of cellulose nanofiber by small quantity acid assisted milling in glycerol. Cellulose 2019, 26, 3735–3745. [CrossRef]

81. Jiang, F.; Hsieh, Y.-L. Chemically and mechanically isolated nanocellulose and their self-assembled structures. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 95, 32–40. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

82. Ohkawa, K.; Hayashi, S.; Nishida, A.; Yamamoto, H.; Ducreux, J. Preparation of pure cellulose nanofiber via electrospinning. Text. Res. J. 2009, 79, 1396–1401. [CrossRef]

83. Shamskar, K.R.; Heidari, H.; Rashidi, A. Preparation and evaluation of nanocrystalline cellulose aerogels from raw cotton and cotton stalk. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 93, 203–211. [CrossRef]

84. Li, J.; Song, Z.; Li, D.; Shang, S.; Guo, Y. Cotton cellulose nanofiber-reinforced high density polyethylene composites prepared with two different pretreatment methods. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 59, 318–328. [CrossRef]

85. Chin, S.F.; Jimmy, F.B.; Pang, S.C. Size controlled fabrication of cellulose nanoparticles for drug delivery applications. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2018, 43, 262–266. [CrossRef]

86. Zhang, L.; Tsuzuki, T.; Wang, X. Preparation of cellulose nanofiber from softwood pulp by ball milling. Cellulose 2015, 22, 1729–1741. [CrossRef]

87. Li, W.; Yue, J.; Liu, S. Preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose via ultrasound and its reinforcement capability for poly (vinyl alcohol) composites. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2012, 19, 479–485. [CrossRef]

88. Cui, S.; Zhang, S.; Ge, S.; Xiong, L.; Sun, Q. Green preparation and characterization of size-controlled nanocrystalline cellulose via ultrasonic-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 83, 346–352. [CrossRef]

89. Hietala, M.; Rollo, P.; Kekäläinen, K.; Oksman, K. Extrusion processing of green biocomposites: Compounding, fibrillation efficiency, and fiber dispersion. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 39981. [CrossRef]

90. Istomin, A.; Demina, T.; Subcheva, E.; Akopova, T.; Zelenetskii, A. Nanocrystalline cellulose from flax stalks: Preparation, structure, and use. Fibre Chem. 2016, 48, 199–201. [CrossRef]

91. Shaheen, T.I.; Montaser, A.; Li, S. Effect of cellulose nanocrystals on scaffolds comprising chitosan, alginate and hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 121, 814–821. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

92. Kim, H.J.; Oh, D.X.; Choy, S.; Nguyen, H.-L.; Cha, H.J.; Hwang, D.S. 3D cellulose nanofiber scaffold with homogeneous cell population and long-term proliferation. Cellulose 2018, 25, 7299–7314. [CrossRef]

93. Gu, H.; Gao, X.; Zhang, H.; Chen, K.; Peng, L. Fabrication and characterization of cellulose nanoparticlesfrom maize stalk pith via ultrasonic-mediated cationic etherification. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 66, 104932.  [CrossRef]

94. Prud’homme, R.K.; Feng, J.; Ristroph, K.D.; LU, H.; Zhang, Y.; Mcmanus, S.A.; Pagels, R.F. Cellulosic PolymerNanoparticles and Methods of Forming Them. US Patent App. 16/816,241, 2 July 2020.

95. Turbak, A.F.; Snyder, F.W.; Sandberg, K.R. Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: Properties,  uses, and commercial potential. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Appl. Polym. Symp. 1983, 37. Available online: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5062478-microfibrillated-cellulose-new-cellulose-product-propertiesuses-commercial-potential (accessed on 1 January 1983).

96. Azizi Samir, M.A.S.; Alloin, F.; Sanchez, J.-Y.; El Kissi, N.; Dufresne, A. Preparation of cellulose whiskers reinforced nanocomposites from an organic medium suspension. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 1386–1393. [CrossRef]

97. Svagan, A.J.; Azizi Samir, M.A.; Berglund, L.A. Biomimetic polysaccharide nanocomposites of high cellulose content and high toughness. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 2556–2563. [CrossRef]

98. Henriksson, M.; Berglund, L.A.; Isaksson, P.; Lindstrom, T.; Nishino, T. Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 1579–1585. [CrossRef]

99. Fang, B.; Wan, Y.-Z.; Tang, T.-T.; Gao, C.; Dai, K.-R. Proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells on hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part A 2009, 15, 1091–1098. [CrossRef]

100. Rosa, M.; Medeiros, E.; Malmonge, J.; Gregorski, K.; Wood, D.; Mattoso, L.; Glenn, G.; Orts, W.; Imam, S. Cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk fibers: Effect of preparation conditions on their thermal and morphological behavior. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 81, 83–92. [CrossRef]

101. Crotogino, R. NanoCellulose. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Assessing the Economic Impact of Nanotechnology, Washington, DC, USA, 27–28 March 2012.

102. Dugan, J.M.; Gough, J.E.; Eichhorn, S.J. Bacterial cellulose scaffolds and cellulose nanowhiskers for tissueengineering. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 287–298. [CrossRef]

103. Zhou, C.; Shi, Q.; Guo, W.; Terrell, L.; Qureshi, A.T.; Hayes, D.J.; Wu, Q. Electrospun bio-nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by cellulose nanocrystals reinforcing maleic anhydride grafted PLA. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 3847–3854. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

104. Yang, X.; Shi, K.; Zhitomirsky, I.; Cranston, E.D. Cellulose nanocrystal aerogels as universal 3D lightweight substrates for supercapacitor materials. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 6104–6109. [CrossRef]

105. Liu, J.; Cheng, F.; Grénman, H.; Spoljaric, S.; Seppälä, J.; Eriksson, J.E.; Willför, S.; Xu, C. Development ofnanocellulose scaffolds with tunable structures to support 3D cell culture. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 148, 259–271. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

 106. Li, V.C.-F.; Dunn, C.K.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, Y.; Qi, H.J. Direct ink write (DIW) 3D printed cellulose nanocrystalaerogel structures. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

107. Apelgren, P.; Karabulut, E.; Amoroso, M.; Mantas, A.; Martínez Ávila, H.c.; Kölby, L.; Kondo, T.; Toriz, G.; Gatenholm, P. In vivo human cartilage formation in three-dimensional bioprinted constructs with a novel bacterial nanocellulose bioink. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 2482–2490. [CrossRef]

108. Bukhari, N.; Joseph, J.P.; Hussain, J.; Adeeb, M.A.M.; Wakim, M.J.Y.; Yahya, E.B.; Arif, A.; Saleem, A.; Sharif, N. Prevalence of Human Papilloma Virus Sub Genotypes following Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Asian Continent, A Systematic Review Article. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. APJCP 2019, 20, 3269–3277. [CrossRef]

109. Surya, I.; Olaiya, N.; Rizal, S.; Zein, I.; Sri Asprila, N.; Hasan, M.; Yahya, E.B.; Sadasivuni, K.; Abdul Khalil, H. Plasticizer Enhancement on the Miscibility and Thermomechanical Properties of Polylactic Acid-Chitin-Starch Composites. Polymers 2020, 12, 115. [CrossRef]

110. Stratton, S.; Shelke, N.B.; Hoshino, K.; Rudraiah, S.; Kumbar, S.G. Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater. 2016, 1, 93–108. [CrossRef]

111. Gutiérrez-Hernández, J.M.; Escobar-García, D.M.; Escalante, A.; Flores, H.; González, F.J.; Gatenholm, P.; Toriz, G. In vitro evaluation of osteoblastic cells on bacterial cellulose modified with multi-walled carbon nanotubes as scaffold for bone regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 75, 445–453. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

112. Feiner, R.; Shapira, A.; Dvir, T. Scaffolds for tissue engineering of functional cardiac muscle. In Handbook of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Volume One; Elsevier: London, UK, 2019; pp. 685–703.

113. Bölgen, N. Electrospun materials for bone and tendon/ligament tissue engineering. In Electrospun Materials for Tissue Engineering and Biomedical Applications; Elsevier: London, UK, 2017; pp. 233–260.

114. Domingues, R.M.; Chiera, S.; Gershovich, P.; Motta, A.; Reis, R.L.; Gomes, M.E. Fabrication of anisotropically aligned nanofibrous scaffolds based on natural/synthetic polymer blends reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals for tendon tissue engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2016, 4. [CrossRef]

115. Dhandayuthapani, B.; Yoshida, Y.; Maekawa, T.; Kumar, D.S. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: A review. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2011, 2011. [CrossRef]

116. Berthiaume, F.; Maguire, T.J.; Yarmush, M.L. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: History, progress, and challenges. Ann. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2011, 2, 403–430. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

117. Olaiya, N.G.; Nuryawan, A.; Oke, P.K.; Abdul Khalil, H.; Rizal, S.; Mogaji, P.; Sadiku, E.; Suprakas, S.; Farayibi, P.K.; Ojijo, V. The role of two-step blending in the properties of starch/chitin/polylactic acid biodegradable composites for biomedical applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 592. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

118. Eltom, A.; Zhong, G.; Muhammad, A. Scaffold techniques and designs in tissue engineering functions and purposes: A review. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 2019. [CrossRef]

119. Venkatesan, J.; Bhatnagar, I.; Kim, S.-K. Chitosan-alginate biocomposite containing fucoidan for bone tissue engineering. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 300–316. [CrossRef]

120. Teimouri, A.; Azadi, M.; Emadi, R.; Lari, J.; Chermahini, A.N. Preparation, characterization, degradation and biocompatibility of different silk fibroin based composite scaffolds prepared by freeze-drying method for tissue engineering application. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2015, 121, 18–29. [CrossRef]

121. Jafari, H.; Shahrousvand, M.; Kaffashi, B. Reinforced poly (ε-caprolactone) bimodal foams via phospho-calcified cellulose nanowhisker for osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 4, 2484–2493. [CrossRef]

122. Annabi, N.; Fathi, A.; Mithieux, S.M.; Martens, P.; Weiss, A.S.; Dehghani, F. The effect of elastin on chondrocyte adhesion and proliferation on poly (ε-caprolactone)/elastin composites. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 1517–1525. [CrossRef]

123. Rodríguez, K.; Sundberg, J.; Gatenholm, P.; Renneckar, S. Electrospun nanofibrous cellulose scaffolds withcontrolled microarchitecture. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 100, 143–149. [CrossRef]

124. Mi, H.-Y.; Jing, X.; Salick, M.R.; Cordie, T.M.; Turng, L.-S. Carbon nanotube (CNT) and nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) reinforcement effect on thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) scaffolds fabricated via phaseseparation using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as solvent. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016, 62, 417–427. [CrossRef]

125. Tang, A.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Zhao, S.; Liu, W.; Liu, T.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y. Nanocellulose/PEGDA aerogel scaffolds with tunable modulus prepared by stereolithography for three-dimensional cell culture. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2019, 30, 797–814. [CrossRef]

126. Salmoria, G.V.; Klauss, P.; Paggi, R.A.; Kanis, L.A.; Lago, A. Structure and mechanical properties of cellulose based scaffolds fabricated by selective laser sintering. Polym. Test. 2009, 28, 648–652. [CrossRef]

127. Kolan, K.C.; Li, W.; Althage, R.; Semon, J.A.; Day, D.E.; Leu, M.C. Solvent and melt based extrusion 3D printing of polycaprolactone bioactive glass composite for tissue engineering. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing, Singapore, 14–17 May 2018.

128. Li, L.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, J. 3D bioprinting of cellulose with controlled porous structures from NMMO. Mater. Lett. 2018, 210, 136–138. [CrossRef]

129. Alemán–Domínguez, M.E.; Giusto, E.; Ortega, Z.; Tamaddon, M.; Benítez, A.N.; Liu, C. Three–dimensional printed polycaprolactone–microcrystalline cellulose scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2019, 107, 521–528. [CrossRef]

130. Huang, A.; Jiang, Y.; Napiwocki, B.; Mi, H.; Peng, X.; Turng, L.-S. Fabrication of poly (ε-caprolactone) tissue engineering scaffolds with fibrillated and interconnected pores utilizing microcellular injection molding and polymer leaching. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 43432–43444. [CrossRef]

131. Kanimozhi, K.; Basha, S.K.; Kumari, V.S.; Kaviyarasu, K. Development of biomimetic hybrid porous scaffold of chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol/carboxymethyl cellulose by freeze-dried and salt leached technique. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 18, 4916–4922. [CrossRef]

132. Chen, G.; Ushida, T.; Tateishi, T. Development of biodegradable porous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2001, 17, 63–69. [CrossRef]

133. Zubairi, S.I. Porous three dimensional (3-D) scaffolds of poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid)(PHB) and poly (3-hydroxybutyric-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid)(PHBV): Determination of salt leaching efficiency of solvent-casting particulate-leaching (SCPL). Adv. Environ. Biol. 2014, 8, 925–932.

134. Khan, S.; Ul-Islam, M.; Ullah, M.W.; Ikram, M.; Subhan, F.; Kim, Y.; Jang, J.H.; Yoon, S.; Park, J.K. Engineered regenerated bacterial cellulose scaffolds for application in in vitro tissue regeneration. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 84565–84573. [CrossRef]

135. Abdelaal, O.A.; Darwish, S.M. Review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering scaffolds fabrication. In Characterization and Development of Biosystems and Biomaterials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 33–54.

136. Zhong, X.; Dehghani, F. Fabrication of biomimetic poly (propylene carbonate) scaffolds by using carbon dioxide as a solvent, monomer and foaming agent. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 2523–2533. [CrossRef]

137. Li, Z.; Xie, M.-B.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, J.-S.; Dai, F.-Y. Recent progress in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. J. Biomater. Tissue Eng. 2016, 6, 755–766. [CrossRef]

138. He, X.; Xiao, Q.; Lu, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X.; Deng, Y. Uniaxially aligned electrospun all-cellulose nanocomposite nanofibers reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals: Scaffold for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 618–627. [CrossRef]

139. Liu, C.; Xia, Z.; Czernuszka, J. Design and development of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2007, 85, 1051–1064. [CrossRef]

140. Lu, T.; Li, Y.; Chen, T. Techniques for fabrication and construction of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering. Int. J. Nanomed. 2013, 8, 337–350. [CrossRef]

141. Chia, H.N.; Wu, B.M. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J. Biol. Eng. 2015, 9, 4. [CrossRef]

142. Rimell, J.T.; Marquis, P.M. Selective laser sintering of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for clinical applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Off. J. Soc. Biomater. Japn. Soc. Biomater. Aust. Soc. Biomater. Korean Soc. Biomater. 2000, 53, 414–420. [CrossRef]

143. Shuai, C.; Yuan, X.; Yang, W.; Peng, S.; He, C.; Feng, P.; Qi, F.; Wang, G. Cellulose nanocrystals as biobasednucleation agents in poly-l-lactide scaffold: Crystallization behavior and mechanical properties. Polym. Test. 2020, 85, 106458. [CrossRef]

144. Zhang, B.; Cristescu, R.; Chrisey, D.B.; Narayan, R.J. Solvent-based Extrusion 3D Printing for the Fabricationof Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. Int. J. Bioprinting 2020, 6, 211. [CrossRef]

145. Vaezi, M.; Yang, S. A novel bioactive PEEK/HA composite with controlled 3D interconnected HA network.Int. J. Bioprinting 2015, 1, 66–76. [CrossRef]

146. Lu, X.; Lee, Y.; Yang, S.; Hao, Y.; Evans, J.R.; Parini, C.G. Fine lattice structures fabricated by extrusion freeforming: Process variables. J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 2009, 209, 4654–4661. [CrossRef]

147. Wang, M.; Favi, P.; Cheng, X.; Golshan, N.H.; Ziemer, K.S.; Keidar, M.; Webster, T.J. Cold atmospheric plasma(CAP) surface nanomodified 3D printed polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater.2016, 46, 256–265. [CrossRef]

 148. Wu, Z.; Su, X.; Xu, Y.; Kong, B.; Sun, W.; Mi, S. Bioprinting three-dimensional cell-laden tissue constructs with controllable degradation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–10. [CrossRef]

149. Xu, C.; Molino, B.Z.; Wang, X.; Cheng, F.; Xu, W.; Molino, P.; Bacher, M.; Su, D.; Rosenau, T.; Willför, S. 3D printing of nanocellulose hydrogel scaffolds with tunable mechanical strength towards wound healing application. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 7066–7075. [CrossRef]

150. Murphy, S.V.; Atala, A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 773–785. [CrossRef]

151. Salgado, A.; Gomes, M.E.; Chou, A.; Coutinho, O.; Reis, R.; Hutmacher, D. Preliminary study on the adhesion and proliferation of human osteoblasts on starch-based scaffolds. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2002, 20, 27–33. [CrossRef]

152. Banoriya, D.; Purohit, R.; Dwivedi, R. Modern trends in rapid prototyping for biomedical applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2015, 2, 3409–3418. [CrossRef]

153. Hoque, M.E.; Chuan, Y.L.; Pashby, I. Extrusion based rapid prototyping technique: An advanced platform for tissue engineering scaffold fabrication. Biopolymers 2012, 97, 83–93. [CrossRef]

154. Kim, G.H.; Ahn, S.H.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, S.; Cho, Y.; Chun, W. A new hybrid scaffold using rapid prototyping and electrohydrodynamic direct writing for bone tissue regeneration. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 19138–19143. [CrossRef]

155. Seunarine, K.; Gadegaard, N.; Tormen, M.; Meredith, D.; Riehle, M.; Wilkinson, C. 3D polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Fut. Med. 2006, 1, 281–296. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

156. Mondschein, R.J.; Kanitkar, A.; Williams, C.B.; Verbridge, S.S.; Long, T.E. Polymer structure-property requirements for stereolithographic 3D printing of soft tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 2017, 140, 170–188. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

157. Yin, F.; Lin, L.; Zhan, S. Preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystals, gelatin, hyaluronic acidcomposite hydrogel as wound dressing. J. Biomater. Sci. Poly. Ed. 2019, 30, 190–201. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

158. Ul-Islam, M.; Subhan, F.; Islam, S.U.; Khan, S.; Shah, N.; Manan, S.; Ullah, M.W.; Yang, G. Development of three-dimensional bacterial cellulose/chitosan scaffolds: Analysis of cell-scaffold interaction for potential application in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 137, 1050–1059. [CrossRef][PubMed]

159. Lopes, V.R.; San z-Martinez, C.; Strømme, M.; Ferraz, N. In vitro biological responses to nanofibrillated cellulose by human dermal, lung and immune cells: Surface chemistry aspect. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2017, 14, 1. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

160. Ninan, N.; Muthiah, M.; Park, I.-K.; Elain, A.; Thomas, S.; Grohens, Y. Pectin/carboxymethyl cellulose/microfibrillated cellulose composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 98,877–885. [CrossRef]

161. Courtenay, J.C.; Johns, M.A.; Galembeck, F.; Deneke, C.; Lanzoni, E.M.; Costa, C.A.; Scott, J.L.; Sharma, R.I.Surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering. Cellulose 2017, 24, 253–267. [CrossRef]

162. Atila, D.; Keskin, D.; Tezcaner, A. Cellulose acetate based 3-dimensional electrospun scaffolds for skin tissue engineering applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 133, 251–261. [CrossRef]

163. Khan, S.; Ul-Islam, M.; Ikram, M.; Islam, S.U.; Ullah, M.W.; Israr, M.; Jang, J.H.; Yoon, S.; Park, J.K. Preparation and structural characterization of surface modified microporous bacterial cellulose scaffolds: A potential material for skin regeneration applications in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 117, 1200–1210. [CrossRef]

164. Czaja, W.; Kyryliouk, D.; DePaula, C.A.; Buechter, D.D. Oxidation of γ–irradiated microbial cellulose results in bioresorbable, highly conformable biomaterial. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 39995. [CrossRef]

165. Edlund, U.; Lagerberg, T.; Ålander, E. Admicellar polymerization coating of CNF enhances integration in degradable nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 2018, 20, 684–692. [CrossRef]

166. Laurén, P. Biomedical Applications of Nanofibrillar Cellulose. Ph.D. Thesis, Helsinki University, Helsinki,Finland, 2018.

167. Von Recum, H.A. From Biocompatibility to Immune Engineering. Exp. Biol. Med. 2016, 241, 889. [CrossRef]

168. Togo, K.; Yamamoto, M.; Imai, M.; Akiyama, K.; Yamashita, A.C. Comparison of biocompatibility in cellulose triacetate dialysis membranes with homogeneous and asymmetric structures. Renal Replace. Ther. 2018, 4, 29. [CrossRef]

169. Strätz, J.; Liedmann, A.; Heinze, T.; Fischer, S.; Groth, T. Effect of Sulfation Route and Subsequent Oxidation on Derivatization Degree and Biocompatibility of Cellulose Sulfates. Macromol. Biosc. 2019, 20, 1900403. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

170. Ramphul, H.; Gimié, F.; Andries, J.; Jhurry, D.; Bhaw-Luximon, A. Sugar-cane bagasse cellulose-based scaffolds promote multi-cellular interactions, angiogenesis and reduce inflammation for skin tissue regeneration. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 157, 296–310. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

171. Lin, N.; Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 59, 302–325. [CrossRef]

172. Ali, A.A.A.R.; May, L.W.; Paterson, I.C.; John, J. OSC1: Assessment of Cytotoxicity of Microcrystalline Cellulose Reinforced Denture Base Resin. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 2018, 18, S7. [CrossRef]

173. Vartiainen, J.; Pöhler, T.; Sirola, K.; Pylkkänen, L.; Alenius, H.; Hokkinen, J.; Tapper, U.; Lahtinen, P.; Kapanen, A.; Putkisto, K. Health and environmental safety aspects of friction grinding and spray drying of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 2011, 18, 775–786. [CrossRef]

174. He, X.; Fan, X.; Feng, W.; Chen, Y.; Guo, T.; Wang, F.; Liu, J.; Tang, K. Incorporation of microfibrillated cellulose into collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 385–392. [CrossRef]

175. Kalita, R.D.; Nath, Y.; Ochubiojo, M.E.; Buragohain, A.K. Extraction and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose from fodder grass; Setaria glauca (L) P. Beauv, and its potential as a drug delivery vehicle for isoniazid, a first line antituberculosis drug. Coll. Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 108, 85–89. [CrossRef]

176. Bajpai, S.; Chand, N.; Ahuja, S.; Roy, M. Vapor induced phase inversion technique to prepare chitosan/microcrystalline cellulose composite films: Synthesis, characterization and moisture absorption study. Cellulose 2015, 22, 3825–3837. [CrossRef]

177. Singh, P.; Medronho, B.; dos Santos, T.; Nunes-Correia, I.; Granja, P.; Miguel, M.G.; Lindman, B. On the viability, cytotoxicity and stability of probiotic bacteria entrapped in cellulose-based particles. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 82, 457–465. [CrossRef]

178. Ogonowski, M.; Edlund, U.; Gorokhova, E.; Linde, M.; Ek, K.; Liewenborg, B.; Könnecke, O.; Navarro, J.R.; Breitholtz, M. Multi-level toxicity assessment of engineered cellulose nanofibrils in Daphnia magna. Nanotoxicology 2018, 12, 509–521. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

179. Kim, S.; Ji Gwak, E.; Jeong, S.; Lee, S.; Sim, W. Toxicity Evaluation of Cellulose Nanofibers (Cnfs) for Cosmetic Industry Application. J. Toxicol. Risk Assess 2019, 5, 29.

180. Alexandrescu, L.; Syverud, K.; Gatti, A.; Chinga-Carrasco, G. Cytotoxicity tests of cellulose nanofibril-based structures. Cellulose 2013, 20, 1765–1775. [CrossRef]

181. Coelho, C.C.; Michelin, M.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Gonçalves, C.; Tonon, R.V.; Pastrana, L.M.; Freitas-Silva, O.;Vicente, A.A.; Cabral, L.M.; Teixeira, J.A. Cellulose nanocrystals from grape pomace: Production, properties and cytotoxicity assessment. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 192, 327–336. [CrossRef]

182. Shaheen, T.I.; Fouda, A. Green approach for one-pot synthesis of silver nanorod using cellulose nanocrystal and their cytotoxicity and antibacterial assessment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 784–792. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

183. Xiao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, M.; Lei, H.; Xu, H. Cellulose nanocrystals prepared from wheat bran: Characterization and cytotoxicity assessment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 140, 225–233. [CrossRef]

184. Nelson, C.; Khan, Y.; Laurencin, C.T. Nanofiber–microsphere (nano-micro) matrices for bone regenerative engineering: A convergence approach toward matrix design. Regen. Biomater. 2014, 1, 3–9. [CrossRef]

185. Lotfi, M.; Bagherzadeh, R.; Naderi-Meshkin, H.; Mahdipour, E.; Mafinezhad, A.; Sadeghnia, H.R.; Esmaily, H.; Maleki, M.; Hasssanzadeh, H.; Ghayaour-Mobarhan, M. Hybrid chitosan–ß-glycerol phosphate–gelatin nano-/micro fibrous scaffolds with suitable mechanical and biological properties for tissue engineering. Biopolymers 2016, 105, 163–175. [CrossRef]

186. La Mantia, F.; Morreale, M.; Botta, L.; Mistretta, M.; Ceraulo, M.; Scaffaro, R. Degradation of polymer blends: A brief review. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2017, 145, 79–92. [CrossRef]

187. Kuzmina, O.; Heinze, T.; Wawro, D. Blending of cellulose and chitosan in alkyl imidazolium ionic liquids. ISRN Polym. Sci. 2012, 2012. [CrossRef]

188. Rogovina, S.Z.; Vikhoreva, G.A. Polysaccharide-based polymer blends: Methods of their production. Glycoconj. J. 2006, 23, 611. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

189. Ramasubramanian, S.; Nasreen, K.; Vijayalakshmi, K.; Govindarajan, C.; Sudha, P. Synthesis and Characterisation of Ternary Blends of Chitosan. Int. J. Chem. Res. 2011, 3, 27–32.

190. HPS, A.K.; Saurabh, C.K.; Adnan, A.; Fazita, M.N.; Syakir, M.; Davoudpour, Y.; Rafatullah, M.; Abdullah, C.; Haafiz, M.; Dungani, R. A review on chitosan-cellulose blends and nanocellulose reinforced chitosan biocomposites: Properties and their applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 150, 216–226.

191. Tuancharoensri, N.; Ross, G.M.; Mahasaranon, S.; Topham, P.D.; Ross, S. Ternary blend nanofibres of poly (lactic acid), polycaprolactone and cellulose acetate butyrate for skin tissue scaffolds: Influence of blend ratio and polycaprolactone molecular mass on miscibility, morphology, crystallinity and thermal properties. Polym. Int. 2017, 66, 1463–1472. [CrossRef]

192. Khalili, S.; Khorasani, S.N.; Razavi, S.M.; Hashemibeni, B.; Tamayol, A. Nanofibrous scaffolds with biomimetic composition for skin regeneration. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 187, 1193–1203. [CrossRef]

193. Bajaj, P.; Schweller, R.M.; Khademhosseini, A.; West, J.L.; Bashir, R. 3D biofabrication strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 16, 247–276. [CrossRef]

194. Nada, A.A.; Arul, M.R.; Ramos, D.M.; Kroneková, Z.; Mosná?cek, J.; Rudraiah, S.; Kumbar, S.G. Bioactive polymeric formulations for wound healing. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2018, 29, 1815–1825. [CrossRef]

195. Rusu, D.; Ciolacu, D.; Simionescu, B.C. Cellulose-based hydrogels in tissue engineering applications. Cell. Chem. Technol. 2019, 53, 907–923. [CrossRef]

196. Müller, M.; Öztürk, E.; Arlov, Ø.; Gatenholm, P.; Zenobi-Wong, M. Alginate sulfate–nanocellulose bioinks for cartilage bioprinting applications. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2017, 45, 210–223. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

197. Ghaemi, F.; Abdullah, L.C. Comparative study of cytotoxicity effect between cellulose nanocrystal and cellulose nanofiber. Adv. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 1, 1–3.

198. Roman, M. Toxicity of cellulose nanocrystals: A review. Ind. Biotechnol. 2015, 11, 25–33. [CrossRef]

199. Blackstone, B.N.; Hahn, J.M.; McFarland, K.L.; DeBruler, D.M.; Supp, D.M.; Powell, H.M. Inflammatory response and biomechanical properties of coaxial scaffolds for engineered skin in vitro and post-grafting. Acta Biomater. 2018, 80, 247–257. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

200. Domingues, R.M.; Gomes, M.E.; Reis, R.L. The potential of cellulose nanocrystals in tissue engineering strategies. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 2327–2346. [CrossRef]

201. Sivashanmugam, A.; Kumar, R.A.; Priya, M.V.; Nair, S.V.; Jayakumar, R. An overview of injectable polymeric hydrogels for tissue engineering. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 72, 543–565. [CrossRef]

202. Xu, D.; Fan, L.; Gao, L.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ye, Q.; Yu, A.; Dai, H.; Yin, Y.; Cai, J. Micro-nanostructured polyaniline assembled in cellulose matrix via interfacial polymerization for applications in nerve regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 17090–17097. [CrossRef]

203. Piras, C.C.; Fernández-Prieto, S.; De Borggraeve, W.M. Nanocellulosic materials as bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biomater. Sci. 2017, 5, 1988–1992. [CrossRef]

204. Markstedt, K.; Escalante, A.; Toriz, G.; Gatenholm, P. Biomimetic inks based on cellulose nanofibrils and cross-linkable xylans for 3D printing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 40878–40886. [CrossRef]

205. Wu, Y.; Lin, Z.Y.W.; Wenger, A.C.; Tam, K.C.; Tang, X.S. 3D bioprinting of liver-mimetic construct with alginate/cellulose nanocrystal hybrid bioink. Bioprinting 2018, 9, 1–6. [CrossRef]

206. Johnen, C.; Steffen, I.; Beichelt, D.; Bräutigam, K.; Witascheck, T.; Toman, N.; Moser, V.; Ottomann, C.; Hartmann, B.; Gerlach, J. Culture of subconfluent human fibroblasts and keratinocytes using biodegradable transfer membranes. Burns 2008, 34, 655–663. [CrossRef]

207. Sanchavanakit, N.; Sangrungraungroj, W.; Kaomongkolgit, R.; Banaprasert, T.; Pavasant, P.; Phisalaphong, M. Growth of human keratinocytes and fibroblasts on bacterial cellulose film. Biotechnol. Prog. 2006, 22, 1194–1199. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

208. Huang, R.; Wang, J.; Chen, H.; Shi, X.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Tan, Z. The topography of fibrous scaffolds modulates the paracrine function of Ad-MSCs in the regeneration of skin tissues. Biomater. Sci. 2019, 7, 4248–4259. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

209. Rees, A.; Powell, L.C.; Chinga-Carrasco, G.; Gethin, D.T.; Syverud, K.; Hill, K.E.; Thomas, D.W. 3D bioprinting of carboxymethylated-periodate oxidized nanocellulose constructs for wound dressing applications. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 925757. [CrossRef]

210. Cecen, B.; Kozaci, L.D.; Yuksel, M.; Ustun, O.; Ergur, B.U.; Havitcioglu, H. Biocompatibility and biomechanical characteristics of loofah based scaffolds combined with hydroxyapatite, cellulose, poly-l-lactic acid with chondrocyte-like cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 69, 437–446. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

211. Torres–Rendon, J.G.; Femmer, T.; De Laporte, L.; Tigges, T.; Rahimi, K.; Gremse, F.; Zafarnia, S.; Lederle, W.; Ifuku, S.; Wessling, M. Bioactive gyroid scaffolds formed by sacrificial templating of nanocellulose and nanochitin hydrogels as instructive platforms for biomimetic tissue engineering. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27,2989–2995. [CrossRef]

212. Shi, Z.; Gao, H.; Feng, J.; Ding, B.; Cao, X.; Kuga, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Cai, J. In situ synthesis of robust conductive cellulose/polypyrrole composite aerogels and their potential application in nerve regeneration. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5380–5384. [CrossRef]

213. Sun, D.; Liu, W.; Tang, A.; Guo, F.; Xie, W. A new PEGDA/CNF aerogel-wet hydrogel scaffold fabricated by a two-step method. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 8092–8101. [CrossRef]

214. Innala, M.; Riebe, I.; Kuzmenko, V.; Sundberg, J.; Gatenholm, P.; Hanse, E.; Johannesson, S. 3D Culturing and differentiation of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells on bacterial nanocellulose scaffolds. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2014, 42, 302–308. [CrossRef]

215. Jonsson, M.; Brackmann, C.; Puchades, M.; Brattås, K.; Ewing, A.; Gatenholm, P.; Enejder, A. Neuronal networks on nanocellulose scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2015, 21, 1162–1170. [CrossRef]

216. Pircher, N.; Fischhuber, D.; Carbajal, L.; Strauß, C.; Nedelec, J.M.; Kasper, C.; Rosenau, T.; Liebner, F. Preparation and reinforcement of dual–porous biocompatible cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2015, 300, 911–924. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

217. Navarro, J.R.; Wennmalm, S.; Godfrey, J.; Breitholtz, M.; Edlund, U. Luminescent nanocellulose platform: From controlled graft block copolymerization to biomarker sensing. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 1101–1109. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

218. O’Donnell, N.; Okkelman, I.A.; Timashev, P.; Gromovykh, T.I.; Papkovsky, D.B.; Dmitriev, R.I. Cellulose-based scaffolds for fluorescence lifetime imaging-assisted tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2018, 80, 85–96. [CrossRef]

219. Kim, K.O.; Kim, G.J.; Kim, J.H. A cellulose/β-cyclodextrin nanofiber patch as a wearable epidermal glucosesensor. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 22790–22794. [CrossRef]

220. Li, H.; Cheng, W.; Liu, K.; Chen, L.; Huang, Y.; Wang, X.; Lv, Z.; He, J.; Li, C. Reinforced collagen with oxidized microcrystalline cellulose shows improved hemostatic effects. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 165, 30–38. [CrossRef]

221. Quero, F.; Padilla, C.; Campos, V.; Luengo, J.; Caballero, L.; Melo, F.; Li, Q.; Eichhorn, S.J.; Enrione, J. Stress transfer and matrix-cohesive fracture mechanism in microfibrillated cellulose-gelatin nanocomposite films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 195, 89–98. [CrossRef]

222. Aravamudhan, A.; Ramos, D.M.; Nip, J.; Kalajzic, I.; Kumbar, S.G. Micro-nanostructures of cellulose-collagen for critical sized bone defect healing. Macromol. Biosci. 2018, 18, 1700263. [CrossRef]

223. Wei, D.; Liu, Q.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Zheng, X.; Pei, Y.; Tang, K. Modified nano microfibrillatedcellulose/carboxymethyl chitosan composite hydrogel with giant network structure and quick gelation formability. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 561–568. [CrossRef]

224. Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, W.; Han, G. Preparation and characterization of composite scaffold ofalginate and cellulose nanofiber from ramie. Text. Res. J. 2019, 89, 3260–3268. [CrossRef]

206. Johnen, C.; Steffen, I.; Beichelt, D.; Bräutigam, K.; Witascheck, T.; Toman, N.; Moser, V.; Ottomann, C.; Hartmann, B.; Gerlach, J. Culture of subconfluent human fibroblasts and keratinocytes using biodegradable transfer membranes. Burns 2008, 34, 655–663. [CrossRef]

207. Sanchavanakit, N.; Sangrungraungroj, W.; Kaomongkolgit, R.; Banaprasert, T.; Pavasant, P.; Phisalaphong, M.Growth of human keratinocytes and fibroblasts on bacterial cellulose film. Biotechnol. Prog. 2006, 22, 1194–1199. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

208. Huang, R.; Wang, J.; Chen, H.; Shi, X.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Tan, Z. The topography of fibrous scaffolds modulates the paracrine function of Ad-MSCs in the regeneration of skin tissues. Biomater. Sci. 2019, 7, 4248–4259. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

209. Rees, A.; Powell, L.C.; Chinga-Carrasco, G.; Gethin, D.T.; Syverud, K.; Hill, K.E.; Thomas, D.W. 3D bioprinting of carboxymethylated-periodate oxidized nanocellulose constructs for wound dressing applications. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 925757. [CrossRef]

210. Cecen, B.; Kozaci, L.D.; Yuksel, M.; Ustun, O.; Ergur, B.U.; Havitcioglu, H. Biocompatibility and biomechanicalcharacteristics of loofah based scaffolds combined with hydroxyapatite, cellulose, poly-l-lactic acid with chondrocyte-like cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 69, 437–446. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

211. Torres–Rendon, J.G.; Femmer, T.; De Laporte, L.; Tigges, T.; Rahimi, K.; Gremse, F.; Zafarnia, S.; Lederle, W.; Ifuku, S.; Wessling, M. Bioactive gyroid scaffolds formed by sacrificial templating of nanocellulose and nanochitin hydrogels as instructive platforms for biomimetic tissue engineering. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2989–2995. [CrossRef]

212. Shi, Z.; Gao, H.; Feng, J.; Ding, B.; Cao, X.; Kuga, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Cai, J. In situ synthesis of robust conductive cellulose/polypyrrole composite aerogels and their potential application in nerve regeneration. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5380–5384. [CrossRef]

213. Sun, D.; Liu, W.; Tang, A.; Guo, F.; Xie, W. A new PEGDA/CNF aerogel-wet hydrogel scaffold fabricated by a two-step method. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 8092–8101. [CrossRef]

214. Innala, M.; Riebe, I.; Kuzmenko, V.; Sundberg, J.; Gatenholm, P.; Hanse, E.; Johannesson, S. 3D Culturing and differentiation of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells on bacterial nanocellulose scaffolds. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2014, 42, 302–308. [CrossRef]

215. Jonsson, M.; Brackmann, C.; Puchades, M.; Brattås, K.; Ewing, A.; Gatenholm, P.; Enejder, A. Neuronal networks on nanocellulose scaffolds. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 2015, 21, 1162–1170. [CrossRef]

216. Pircher, N.; Fischhuber, D.; Carbajal, L.; Strauß, C.; Nedelec, J.M.; Kasper, C.; Rosenau, T.; Liebner, F.Preparation and reinforcement of dual–porous biocompatible cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2015, 300, 911–924. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

217. Navarro, J.R.; Wennmalm, S.; Godfrey, J.; Breitholtz, M.; Edlund, U. Luminescent nanocellulose platform: From controlled graft block copolymerization to biomarker sensing. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 1101–1109. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

218. O’Donnell, N.; Okkelman, I.A.; Timashev, P.; Gromovykh, T.I.; Papkovsky, D.B.; Dmitriev, R.I. Cellulose-based scaffolds for fluorescence lifetime imaging-assisted tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2018, 80, 85–96. [CrossRef]

219. Kim, K.O.; Kim, G.J.; Kim, J.H. A cellulose/β-cyclodextrin nanofiber patch as a wearable epidermal glucose sensor. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 22790–22794. [CrossRef]

220. Li, H.; Cheng, W.; Liu, K.; Chen, L.; Huang, Y.; Wang, X.; Lv, Z.; He, J.; Li, C. Reinforced collagen with oxidized microcrystalline cellulose shows improved hemostatic effects. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 165, 30–38. [CrossRef]

221. Quero, F.; Padilla, C.; Campos, V.; Luengo, J.; Caballero, L.; Melo, F.; Li, Q.; Eichhorn, S.J.; Enrione, J. Stress transfer and matrix-cohesive fracture mechanism in microfibrillated cellulose-gelatin nanocomposite films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 195, 89–98. [CrossRef]

222. Aravamudhan, A.; Ramos, D.M.; Nip, J.; Kalajzic, I.; Kumbar, S.G. Micro-nanostructures of cellulose-collagen for critical sized bone defect healing. Macromol. Biosci. 2018, 18, 1700263. [CrossRef]

223. Wei, D.; Liu, Q.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Zheng, X.; Pei, Y.; Tang, K. Modified nano microfibrillated cellulose/carboxymethyl chitosan composite hydrogel with giant network structure and quick gelation formability. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 561–568. [CrossRef]

224. Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, W.; Han, G. Preparation and characterization of composite scaffold of alginate and cellulose nanofiber from ramie. Text. Res. J. 2019, 89, 3260–3268. [CrossRef]