A validity of accountability among guidance and  counseling teachers for students at risk of dropping out intervention program instruments

Nurulaini Moshidi

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
Main Author :	Nurulaini Moshidi
Additional Authors :	Ahmad Jazimin Jusoh
Title :	A validity of accountability among guidance and counseling teachers for students at risk of dropping out intervention program instruments

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :	2020
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Students at risk of dropping out intervention program are a proactive step taken by Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE) (2018) in addressing the problem. Guidance and counseling teachers has been given responsibility as a planner and executor in this program. This study using quantitative approach which is a survey of 100 respondents among the guidance and counseling teachers who teach in secondary school only. The purpose of this study is to validate the instrument of Accountability among Guidance and Counseling Teachers for Students at Risk of Dropping out Intervention Program based on four components which are Define; Manage; Deliver and; Assess using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). The EFA results found that all factor loadings were greater than 0.55 meaning that all items were received and no items were dropped. Based on the analysis performed, it can be concluded that the instrument used has a good degree of validity in determining the accountability among guidance and counseling teachers in secondary schools in implementation Students at Risk of Dropping out Intervention Program

References

Abdul Malek Abdul Rahman, Nor Junainah Mohd Isa & Azizah Atan (2013). A Guidance And Counseling Model Practiced Within Malaysian Schools. International Journal of Education and Research, Vol. 1 No. 4 April 2013.

American School Counselor Association (2012). ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.

American School Counselor Association (2019). ASCA National Model. https://www.schoolcounselor.org/schoolcounselors-members/asca-national-model

Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C. & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to Research in Education (6th ed.). Belmont CA: Wadsworth.

Baker, S. B. (2012). A new view of evidence-based practice. Counseling Today. Alexandria, VA: American Counselor Association.

Camelford, K. G. & Ebrahim, C. H. (2017). Factors That Affect Implementation of a Comprehensive School Counseling Program in Secondary Schools. Retrieved from https://www.counseling.org/docs/defaultsource/vistas/comprehensive-school-counseling.pdf?sfvrsn=4 on 29 July 2019.

Chua, Y. P. (2014). Kaedah penyelidikan: Buku 1 (3rd ed.). Malaysia: McGraw-Hill

Erford, B. T. (2015). Research and evaluation in counseling (2nd ed.). Boston: Lahaska Press.

Fauziah Hanim Jalal, Nurul’Ain Daud & Nazariah Abd Samad (2015). Kesan Program Pembangunan SahsiahTerhadap Pembentukan Karakter Pelajar. Jurnal Bitara Edisi Khas, Vol. 8.

Gysbers, N. C. (2004). Comprehensive guidance and counseling programs: The evolution of accountability. Professional School Counseling, 8, 1–14.

Gysbers, N. C. (2010). Remembering the past, shaping the future: A history of school counseling. Alexandria, VA: American School Counselor Association.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2018). Bilangan 4 Tahun 2018. Garis panduan mengurus murid berisiko cicir di sekolah. Diperolehi https://www.moe.gov.my/images/KPM/ZOOupload/SPI%20BIL%204%20TAHUN%202018-1.pdf.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2019). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 Laporan Tahunan 2018. Putrajaya: KPM.

Malek Muhamat Said (2007). Mengurus khidmat bimbingan dan kaunseling sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional.

McKee, M. T. & Caldarella, P. (2016). Middle school predictors of high school performance: a case study of dropout risk indicators. Education, 136(4), 515-529.

Mohammad Rahim Kamaluddin & Khaidzir Ismail (2017). Kesahan Konstruk dan Analisis Penerokaan Faktor. Dalam Mohammad Rahim Kamaluddin & Wan Shahrazad Wan Sulaiman, Teknik Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Alat Ujian Psikologi (pp. 51-66). Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Mohd Majid Konting (2009). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Edisi Kelapan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Ramlee Ismail, Jamal@Nordin Yunus & Marinah Awang (2016). Analisis Data dan Pelaporan dengan Menggunakan SPSS. Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI)

Studer, J. R. (2015). The essential school counselor in a changing society. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Tengku Elmi Azlina Tengku Muda & Noriah Mohd Ishak. (2014). Kepimpinan Ketua Guru Bimbingan dan Kaunseling: Implikasi kepada Peningkatan Keberkesanan Perkhidmatan Bimbingan dan Kaunseling Sekolah Menengah. International Research Management and Innovation Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 469-488.

Zainol Mustafaa, Wong Wai Linga & Mohd Rashid Ab Hamid. (2013). Persepsi Pelajar Terhadap Hasil Pembelajaran Bidang Kejuruteraan. Jurnal Teknologi, 62(1), 41–48.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page