UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Athletes satisfaction is a positive and affective states which is the result of complex evaluation process, structure and outcome associate with the athlete's experience. The purposed of this research is to analyze whether there is a significant effect on UPSI football player satisfaction towards coaching during Covid-19 pandemic. The research is also done to identify leadership style of the coach during covid-19 pandemic. A total of 30 male UPSI football player have been selected as sample. The determination of the sample size was based on the diagram of Krejcie and Morgan (1970). The Leadership Scale for Sports (LSS) developed by Chelladurai & Saleh, (1980) and adapted Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire (ASQ) developed by Zid Azlina (2017) was used in this research. The sample was given a set of questionnaire that included the LSS and Adapted ASQ. On the LSS questionnaire they were 40 questions that were divided into 5 sections with a five point Likert scale; 1 (Never), 2 (Seldom), 3 (Occasionally), 4 (Often), and 5 (Always). On the adapted ASQ the sample were given 19 questions that were divided also into 5 sections with a five point Likert scale; 1 (Not at all satisfied), 2 (Slightly satisfied), 3 (Neutral), 4 (Very satisfied), and 5 (Extremely satisfied). The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23. The descriptive analysis of the data were analyzed using means, frequencies, percentage, and standard deviations. The results shows that training coaching behavior was the most preferred leadership style with the highest mean score (M = 3.03, SD= .91) and followed by social support coaching behavior (M = 2.93, SD= .92), democratic coaching behavior (M= 2.83, SD= .96), rewarding coaching behavior (M = 2.54,SD =.85) and autocratic coaching behavior (M
= 2.48, SD= .81). The results also shows team performance (M = 3.29, SD= .86) was the most important subscale influencing players satisfaction in coaching. The mean scores showed that personal treatment and training instruction (M = 3.03, SD = .79) was the second highest mean
score for athlete satisfaction. The others factors were personal dedication (M = 2.83, SD= .82),
team task contribution (M =2.48, SD = .88) and the most obvious of this are ability utilization (M
= 2.45, SD = .76) the lowest rated satisfied for athlete satisfaction. The findings of the study showed that players preferred training and instruction coaching behavior from the coach during the Covid-19 pandemic. The result also showed that the players satisfaction towards coaching remains high during Covid-19 pandemic. It can be concluded that even without proper coaching during this Covid-19 pandemic the players remain satisfied with the coaching and they remain dependent to their coach. This shows that the coach has managed to adapt to this new situation and so do the player.
|
| References |
Begovic , M. (2020) . Effects of COVID-19 on society and sport a national response. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1-6.
Burns, G. N., Jasinski, D., Dunn, S. C., & Fletcher, D. (2012). Athlete identity and athlete satisfaction: The nonconformity of exclusivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 280-284. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.201 1.10.020
Caliskan, G., & Ozge Baydar, H. (2016). Satisfaction Scale For Athlete (SSA): A Study Of Validity And Reliability. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(14), 13. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12nl4p13
Chakraborty, I., & Maity, P. (2020). COVID-19 outbreak: Migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention. Science of the Total Environment, 728, 138882.
Chelladurai, P. (2007). Leadership in sports. Handbook of sport psychology, 3, 113-135.
Chelladurai, P., & Riemer, H. A. (1997). A classification of facets of athlete satisfaction. Journal of sport management, 11(2), 133-159.
Chelladurai, P., & Saleh, S. D. (1980). Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(1), 34-45.
Chiu, W., Rodrig uez, F. M., & Won, D. (2016). Revisiting the leadership scale for sport: Examining factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Reports, 119(2), 435-4 49. https://doi.org /10.1177/0033294116662880
Ciotti, M., Angeletti, S., Minieri, M., Giovannetti, M., Benvenuto, D., Pascarella, S., ... & Ciccozzi, M. (2019). COVID-19 outbreak: an overview. Chemotherapy, 64(5 -6), 215-223.
Cruz, A. B., & Kim, H. D. (2017). Leadership preferences of adolescent players in sport: Influence of coach gender. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 16(2), 172-179.
Daniel, J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1), 91-96.
Davis, L. (2012). The application of attachment theory in the examination of the coach-athlete relationship (Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University).
Karim, Z. A., & Ismail, F. H. (2019). Common Coaching Leadership Style and Leadership Practice Differences between Team Athletes in Kuala Lumpur School Sports Council (MSS WPKL). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(7), 700- 713. https://doi.org/10.6007 /ijarbss/v9-i7 /6162
Karim, Z. A., & Nadzalan, A. M. (2017). Malaysia Football Coaches: Development Characteristics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(9), 305- 312. https://doi.org/10.6007 /ijarbss/v7 -i9/3326
Keatlholetswe , L., & Malet e, L. (2019). Coaching Efficacy, Player Perceptions of Coaches' Leadership Styles, and Team Performance in Premier League Soccer. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 90(1), 71- 79. https ://doi.or g/10.1080/02701367.2018.1563277
Misasi, S. P., Morin, G., & Kwasnowski, L. (2016). Leadership: Athletes and Coaches in Sport. Sport Journal, 1.
Mutz, M. (2021). Forced adaptations of sporting behaviours during the Covid-19 pandemic and their effects on subjective well-being. European Societies, 23(supl), Sl84-S198.
Pido, G. B. (2015). Master Thesis Graduate School of Sport Coaching Science The Relationship of Coaching Leadership and Athletes Satisfaction Advisor: Professor Andy Li-An Ho, Ph. D Graduate Student: Pido Gusti B January, 13. https://doi.org /10.13140/RG.2.2.14074.54722
Pilus, A., & Saadan, R. (2009). COACHING LEADERSHIP STYLES AND ATHLETE Asiah Hj Mohd Pilus Rosli Saadan Centre for Languages and Human Development Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka. 2(1), 77-88.
Piumi, H., & Perera, N. (2015). The relationship between coach leadership behavior and team success in sports : An empirical study of state universities in Western Province. Ma y. -;,I https://doi.org/10.31357/fmscms t.2015.00335
Riemer, H. A., & Chelladurai, P. (1998). Development of the athlete satisfaction questionnaire (ASQ). Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 20(2), 127-156.
Shapie, M. N. M., Zenal, Z., Pamabas, V., & Abdullah, N. M. (2016). The Correlation between leadership coaching style and satisfaction among university silat olahraga athletes. !do Movement for Culture, 16(3), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.14589/ido.16.3 .4
Velavan, T. P., & Meyer, C. G. (2020). The COVID-19 epidemic . Tropical medicine & international health, 25(3), 278.
Yardley, J., Hay, J., Sedgwick, W., & Baker, J. (1999). An exploratory examination of the coaching behavior scale for sport. Avante, 5(3), 82-92.
Zhang, J., Jensen, B. E., & Mann, B. L. (1997). Modification and revision of the leadership scale for sport. Journal of sport behavior, 20(1), 105.
Zid, A (2017). Football players' satis faction: an exploratory factor analysis . Malaysian Journal of Sport Science and Recreation, 13(1), 1-12.
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |