UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :QD Chemistry
Main Author :Choo, Sze Yee
Title :Development and the effect of mobile enthalpy game application on matriculation students achievement in thermochemical equation
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :2021
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
The purpose of this study is to develop a mobile enthalpy game application (MEGA) and study its effect on matriculation students’ achievement in writing thermochemical equations.   MEGA  is  an  Android  game  application  developed  for student  to  acquire skills to write  thermochemical equations. It is developed based on ADDIE’s, Kwon’s and the game-based learning  engineering models. MEGA was validated in terms of content,  pedagogy  and  multimedia  by  using   Cohen’s  kappa  agreement  coefficient. Reliability of MEGA is determined by using the reliability  coefficient. This quantitative study  employed  time-series  quasi  experimental  design  involving   36  students  in  the control group (PowerPoint slides) and 36 students in the experimental group  (MEGA). Samples are chosen by using a simple random sampling technique. The effect of MEGA versus   PowerPoint  slides  on  student  achievement  of  thermochemical  equation  were compared. Data was  collected by using a need analysis questionnaire, pre-tests, post- tests, game score sheets  and   evaluation  forms.  Data were analyzed  descriptively by using  percentage  and  inferentially   using  t-test  and  Pearson  correlation  analysis. Findings showed the Cohen’s kappa agreement for  content is 1.00, pedagogy is 1.00 and  multimedia  is  0.82.  Meanwhile,  the  reliability   coefficient  for  MEGA  is  0.71. Results showed there were no significant differences in pre-test  scores between control and experimental groups. There were significant differences between pre and  post-test scores for control group and experimental group. There was also significant difference in  the post-test scores between control and experimental groups. In conclusion, MEGA could enhance  students’ achievement in writing thermochemical equations compared to the PowerPoint slide  presentation. This study implies, in this era of Education 4.0, mobile game applications (MEGA) could promote gen Z learning of chemistry.  

References

Adesoji, F.A., Omilani, N.A. & Dada, S.O. (2017).   A comparison of perceived and

actual; students’ learning difficulties in physical chemistry. International Journal of Brain and 

Cognitive Sciences, 6(1), 1-8.

 

Ahmad  Abdullahi  Ibrahim  (2015).  Comparative  analysis  between  system  approach, kemp, and 

assure instructional design models. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(12), 

261-270.

 

Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of 

mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93–102. 

doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.033.

 

Antunes, M., Pacheco, M. A. R., & Giovanela, M. (2012). Design and implementation of  an  

educational  game  for  teaching  chemistry  in  higher  education. Journal  of Chemical    

Education, 89(4),    517-521.    Retrieved    March    12,    2019    from https://search- 

proquestcom.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/docview/935471472?accountid=13155.

 

Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education.

Canada: Nelson Education, Ltd.

 

Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. 

Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2, 89–195. doi: 10.1016/s0079- 7421(08)60422-3.

 

Aviles, M., & Eastman, J. K. (2012). Utilizing technology effectively to improve Gen Zs educational 

performance. Journal of International Education in Business, 5(2), 96–113. doi: 

10.1108/18363261211281726.

 

Aziz Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: ideas for teaching. International Journal       

of       Education       and       Literacy       Studies,       6(3),       92–98. 

doi:10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92.

 

Baah,  R.,  & Ampiah,  J.  G.  (2012). Senior  high  school  students' understanding and 

difficulties with chemical equations. International Journal of Scientific, 5(3), 162- 170.

 

Baah,  R.,  &  Anthony-Krueger,  C.  (2012).  An  investigation  into  senior  high  school 

students’ understanding and difficulties in writing chemical formulae of inorganic compounds.    

International    Journal    of    Research    Studies    in    Educational Technology,1(2). 

doi:10.5861/ijrset.2012.119.

 

Baddeley, A.D. (2014). Essentials of human memory (Classic edition.). East Sussex:

Psychology Press.

 

Bae, J. H., & Kim, A. H. (2014). Design and development of Unity3D Game Engine-

based smart SNG (Social Network Game). International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous 

Engineering, 9(8), 261–266. doi: 10.14257/ijmue.2014.9.8.23

 

Bajt, S. K. (2011). Web 2.0 technologies: Applications for community colleges. New Directions for 

Community Colleges, 2011(154), 53–62. doi: 10.1002/cc.446

 

Bartolomé,  A.,  Castañeda,  L.,  &  Adell,  J.  (2018).  Personalisation  in  educational 

technology:  The  absence  of  underlying  pedagogies.  International  Journal  of Educational 

Technology in Higher Education, 15(14), 1-17.

 

Bashir, K. (2018). Understanding the role of user interface design in fostering students’ learning 

process in a multimedia courseware learning environment: Insights from a Malaysian  case  study. 

IIUM  Journal  of  Educational  Studies, 5(1),  93-109.  doi: 10.31436/ijes.v5i1.148

 

Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B.-S., & Silberstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable?

Journal of Chemical Education, 63(1), 64. doi:10.1021/ed063p64.

 

Bloom,  B.S.,  Engelhart,  M.D.,  Furst,  E.J.,  Hill,  W.H.&  Krathwohl,  D.R.  (1956). Taxanomy  

of  Educational  Objectives:  The  Classification  of  Educational  Goals; Handbook I: Cognitive 

Domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.

 

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The addie approach. New York: Springer.

 

Branch,  R.  M.,  &  Gustafson,  K.  L.  (1998).  Re-visioning  models  of  instructional 

development.UK: Upper Saddle River.

 

Branch, R. M., & Merrill, M. D. (2002). Characteristics of instructional design models. In R.A. 

Reiser, & J.V. Dempsey, (2012), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3?? ed., 

pp. 8–16). Boston, United State of America: Pearson.

 

Brumberger, E. (2011). Visual literacy and the digital native: An examination of the Gen     Z     

learner.     Journal     of     Visual     Literacy,     30(1),     19–47.     doi: 

10.1080/23796529.2011.11674683.

 

Cahyana, U., Paristiowati, M., & Fauziyah, S. (2018). Development of Android-Based Mobile  learning 

 media  on  atomic  structure  and  periodic  table.  IOP  Conference Series:    Materials    

Science    and    Engineering,    434(1),    doi:10.1088/1757- 899x/434/1/012095.

 

Cai,  S.,  Wang,  X.,  &  Chiang,  F.-K.  (2014).  A  case  study  of  augmented  reality 

simulation  system  application  in  a  chemistry  course.   Computers  in  Human Behavior, 37, 

31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.018.

 

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs

for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

 

Carr, N. G. (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York:

W.W. Norton.

 

Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a

two-tier  multiple-choice  diagnostic  instrument  for  evaluating  secondary  school students’ 

ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of representation. 

Chemistry   Education   Research   and   Practice,   8(3),   293-307. doi:10.1039/b7rp90006f.

 

Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2009). Emphasizing multiple levels  of  

representation  to  enhance  students’  understandings  of  the  changes occurring during chemical 

reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(12), 1433- 1436, doi:10.1021/ed086p1433.

 

Cheon,  J.,  Lee,  S.,  Crooks,  S.  M.,  &  Song,  J.  (2012).  An  investigation  of  mobile 

learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned  behavior. Computers & 

Education, 59(3), 1054-1064. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015.

 

Cheong, C., Filippou, J & Cheong, F. (2014). Towards the gamification of learning: Investigating 

student perceptions of game elements. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(3), 233-244.

 

Chu,  H.,  &  Hung,  C.  (2015).  Effects  of  the  digital  game-development  approach  on 

elementary  school  students  learning  motivation,  problem  solving,  and  learning achievement. 

International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 13(1), 87- 102. 

doi:10.4018/ijdet.2015010105.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2014). Kaedah penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill.

 

Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and      

learning.      Review      of      Educational      Research,      86(1),      79-122. 

doi:10.3102/0034654315582065.

 

Clark, R. C., Sweller, J. 1., & Nguyen, F. 1. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence- based 

guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

 

Cohen,  J.  (1960). A  coefficient  of  agreement  for  nominal  scales.  Educational  and 

Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104

 

Cojocariu, V., & Boghian, I. (2014). Teaching the relevance of game-based learning to preschool and 

primary teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 640–646. 

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.679.

 

Cresswell,  J.  W.  (2008).  Education  research:  Planning,  conducting,  and  evaluating 

quantitative and qualitative research. United States of America: Pearson Education,

Inc.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating

quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

 

Crimmins, M. T., & Midkiff, B. (2017). High structure active learning pedagogy for the teaching of 

organic chemistry: Assessing the impact on academic outcomes. Journal         of         Chemical   

      Education,         94(4),         429–438.         doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00663

 

Crompton,  H.  (2013).  A  historical  overview  of  mobile  learning:  Toward  learner- centered 

education. In Z. L. Berge, & L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 3–14). 

Florence, KY: Routledge.

 

Da Silva Júnior, J. N., Nobre, D. J., Do Nascimento, R. S., Torres, G. S., Leite, A. J. M., 

Monteiro, A. J., … Rojo, M. J. (2018). Interactive computer game that engages students  in  

reviewing  organic  compound  nomenclature.  Journal  of  Chemical Education, 95, 899–902. 

doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00793

 

Damo, K. L., & Prudente, M. S. (2019). Investigating students attitude and achievement in  organic  

chemistry  using  interactive  application.   Proceedings  of  the  10th International  Conference  

on  E-Education,  E-Business,  E-Management  and  E- Learning     -     IC4E     19,     10-13     

January,     New     York,     United     State, doi:10.1145/3306500.3306562.

 

Dangur, V., Avargil, S., Peskin, U. & Dori, J. Y. (2014). Learning quantum chemistry via   

visual-conceptual   approach:   Students’   bidirectional   textual   and   visual understanding,  

Chemistry  Education  Research  and  Practice,  15,  297–310.  doi: 10.1039/C4RP00025K.

 

Daubenfeld, T., & Zenker, D. (2015). A game-based approach to an entire physical chemistry     

course.     Journal     of     Chemical     Education,     92(2),     269-277. 

doi:10.1021/ed5001697.

 

Dekhane,  S.,  &  Tsoi,  M.  Y.  (2012).  Designing  a  mobile  application  for  conceptual 

understanding. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 4(3), 34-52. 

doi:10.4018/jmbl.2012070103.

 

DiGiuseppe,  M.,  Partosoedarso,  E.,  Van  Oostveen,  R.,  &  Desjardins,  F.  J.  (2013). 

Exploring competency development with mobile devices. In M. B. Nunes & M. McPherson (Eds.), 

International Association for Development of the information society  (IADIS)  international  

conference  on  e-learning  (pp.  384–388).  Prague: International Association for Development of 

the Information Society.

 

Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses   

deliver   in-class   results?A   comparison   of   student   performance   and satisfaction  in  an 

 online  versus  a  face-to-face  Introductory  Sociology  Course. Teaching Sociology, 40(4), 

312–331. doi: 10.1177/0092055X12446624

 

Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. (2010). Educational psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ:

Merrill.

 

El-Hussein, M. O. M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher

education landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12–21.

 

Embong, A. M., Noor, A. M., Hashim, H. M., Ali, R. M., & Shaari, Z. H. (2012). E- books as 

textbooks in the classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1802–1809. doi: 

10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.903

 

Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on 

motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156-167. 

doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.019.

 

Euis Nursa’adah, Liliasari Liliasari., & Ahmad Mudzakir (2017). Teaching–learning sequence:   

Designing   ionic   bonding   concept   through   model   of   educational reconstruction. In H. S. 

H. M. Ade Gafar Abdullah, Ida Hamidah, Siti Aisyah, Ari Arifin Danuwijaya, Galuh Yuliani (Ed.), 

Ideas for 21st Century Education (1st ed., pp. 9–13). doi:10.1201/9781315166575-2

 

Faghih,  B.,  Azadehfar,  M.  R.,  &  Katebi,  S.  D.  (2013).  User  interface  design  for  e- 

learning  software.  The  International  Journal  of  Soft  Computing  and  Software Engineering, 

3(3), 786–794. doi:10.7321/jscse.v3.n3.119

 

Feil,  J.,  &  Scattergood,  M.  (2005). Beginning  game  level  design.  Boston,  MA: Thomson 

Course Technology.

 

Fox, L. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2015). Nationwide survey of the undergraduate physical chemistry    

course.    Journal    of    Chemical    Education,    92(9),    1456–1465. 

doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00070.

 

Fraenkel,  J.  R.,  &  Wallen,  N.  E.  (2003). How  to  design  and  evaluate  research  in 

education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

 

Franco-Mariscal,  A.,  Oliva-Martínez,  J.  M.,  &  Gil,  M.  L.  A.  (2015).  Students' 

perceptions about the use of educational games as a tool for teaching the periodic table of 

elements at the high school level. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(2), 278-285.        Retrieved  

      April        23,        2019,        from        https://search- 

proquest.com.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/docview/1655583222?accountid=13155.

 

Frankfort-Nachmias,  C.  &  Nachmias,  D.  (1996).  Research  methods  in  the  social sciences. 

London: Arnold.

 

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2007). Educational research: An introduction.

Boston: Pearson.

 

Gao, F., Li, L., & Sun, Y. (2020). A systematic review of mobile game-based learning in  STEM  

education.  Educational  Technology  Research  and  Development,  68

(2020), 1791-1827. doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09787-0.

 

Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (2010). Multiple representations in chemical education.

Dordrecht: Springer.

 

Giannakas, F., Kambourakis, G., Papasalouros, A., & Gritzalis, S. (2017). A critical review  of  13 

 years  of  mobile  game-based  learning.  Educational  Technology Research and Development, 66(2), 

341–384. doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9552-z

 

Goyal,  A.  (2018).  Best  Android  game  development  platforms  and  tools  in  2019. Retrieved 

January 21, 2020, from https://www.endivesoftware.com/blog/android- 

game-development-platforms-and-tools/

 

Grimshaw, M. N., Tan, S.-L., & Lipscomb, S. D. (2013). Playing with sound: The role of music and 

sound effects in gaming. In S.-L. Tan, A. Cohen, S. D. Lipscomb, &

R. A. Kendall (Eds.), Psychology of music in multimedia (pp. 289–314). United Kingdom:              

            Oxford                          University                          Press. 

doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608157.001.0001.

 

Gupta,   T.   (2019).   Game-based   learning   in   chemistry:   A   game   for   chemical 

nomenclature.  ACS  Symposium  Series,  1318,  65–79.  doi:  10.1021/bk-2019- 1318.ch005

 

Hafsah Taha, Rosnani Hashim., Zurida Ismail., Kamaruzaman Jusoff., & Khoo, Y.Y. (2014). The 

influence of students’ concept of mole, problem representation ability and mathematical ability on 

stoichiometry problem solving. Scottish Journal of Arts, Social Sciences and Scientific Studies, 

21(1), 3-21.

 

Hallowell, E., & Ratey, J. (2011). Driven to distraction: Recognizing and coping with attention 

deficit disorder. New York: Anchor Books.

 

Hamari,  J.,  Shernoff,  D.  J.,  Rowe,  E.,  Coller,  B.,  Asbell-Clarke,  J.,  &  Edwards,  T. 

(2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion 

in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170–179. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045

 

Hanghøj,  T.,  &  Brund,  C.E.  (2010).  Teacher  Roles  and  Positionings  in  relation  to 

educational games. ECGBL- 4th European Conference on Games Based Learning

- Copenhagen, (21-22 october 2010), Denmark.

 

Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A 

longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and   academic 

  performance.   Computers   and   Education,   80,   152–161.   doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019

 

Harkins,  A.  M.  (2008).  Leapfrog  principles  and  practices:  Core  components  of Education 

3.0 and 4.0. Future Research Quality, 21(1), 19-31.

 

Haryanto,  E.  (2012).  Listening  to  students  voice:  A  survey  of  implementation  of English 

as medium of instruction in an international standard school in Indonesia,

Journal of Education and Practice, 3(15), 111-119.

 

Hasiah  Mohamed,  Nora  Yanti  Che  Jan,  &  Nik  Marsyahariani  Nik  Daud.  (2010).

Exposure of computer games among students in Malaysia: Case study of computer science students in 

UITM Terengganu. Computer and Information Science, 3(1), 144-151. doi:10.5539/cis.v3n1p144.

 

Heale,  R.,  &  Twycross,  A.  (2015).  Validity  and  reliability  in  quantitative  studies.

Evidence Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67. doi:10.1136/eb-2015-102129.

 

Hodges, G. W., Wang, L., Lee, J., Cohen, A., & Jang, Y. (2018). An exploratory study of blending 

the virtual world and the laboratory experience in secondary chemistry classrooms.          

Computers          and          Education,          122,          179-193.

doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.003.

 

Hoffman, B., & Nadelson, L. (2009). Motivational engagement and video gaming: A mixed methods 

study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(3), 245-270. 

doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9134-9.

 

Holmes, V. (2012). New digital energy game, the use of games to influence attitudes, interests, and 

student achievement in science. Retrieved March 13, 2020, from the 

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED536550.pdf

 

Huizenga, J., Ten Dam, G., Voogt, J., & Admiraal,W. (2017). Teacher perceptions of the value of 

game-based learning in secondary education. Computers & Education, 110, 105–115. doi:10.1016/j. 

compedu.2017.03.008.

 

Hung, C. Y., Sun, J. C. Y., & Yu, P. T. (2015). The benefits of a challenge: Student motivation  

and  flow  experience  in  tablet-PC-game-based  learning.  Interactive Learning Environments, 

23(2), 172–190. doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.997248

 

Hussin, S., Manap, M. R., Amir, Z., & Krish, P. (2012). Mobile learning readiness among Malaysian 

students at higher learning institutes. Asian Social Science, 8(12), 276–283. 

doi:10.5539/ass.v8n12p276

 

Hwang, W. Y., Shih, T. K., Ma, Z. H., Shadiev, R., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). Evaluating listening and 

speaking skills in a mobile game-based learning environment with situational contexts. Computer 

Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 639–657. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1016438

 

Isa,  Z.,  Zakaria,  A.  M.,  Azlan,  M.  I.,  Noorani,  M.  S.  M.,  Majid,  N.,  Ismail,  H.,  … 

Ahmad, A. G. (2011). Students’ perceptions of the implementation of teaching and learning of 

science and mathematics in English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 361–366. 

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.051

 

Jaber, L. Z., & Boujaoude, S. (2012). A macro–micro–symbolic teaching to promote relational  

understanding  of  chemical  reactions.  International  Journal  of  Science Education, 34(7), 

973–998. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.569959.

 

Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.

 

Jamaludin,   R.   (2000). Multimedia   dalam   pendidikan.   Kuala   Lumpur:   Utusan

Publications & Distributors.

 

Jarvin, L. (2015). Edutainment, games, and the future of education in a digital world. New  

Directions  for  Child  and  Adolescent  Development,  2015(147),  33-40.  doi: 10.1002/cad.20082.

 

Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. 

Journal  of  Computer  Assisted  Learning, 7(2),  75-83.  doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2729.1991.tb00230.x.

 

Jones, S. (2010). Transnational learning and collaboration in delivering MBA programs in emerging 

markets: The challenge of national culture. In S. Mukerji & T. Tripathi (Ed.), Cases on 

transnational learning and technologically enabled environments (pp.50-64). New York, Hershey: 

Information Science Reference.

 

Jones, O. A. H., Spichkova, M., & Spencer, M. J. S. (2018). Chirality-2: Development of  a  

multilevel  mobile  gaming  app  to  support  the  teaching  of  introductory undergraduate-level  

organic  chemistry.  Journal  of  Chemical  Education,  95(7), 1216-1220. 

doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00856.

 

Karacop,  A.,  &  Doymus,  K.  (2013).  Effects  of  jigsaw  cooperative  learning  and animation  

techniques  on  students’  understanding  of  chemical  bonding  and  their conceptions of the 

particulate nature of matter. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 186-203. 

doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9385-9.

 

Kavak, N. (2012). ChemOkey: A game to reinforce nomenclature. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(8), 

1047–1049. doi:10.1021/ed3000556

 

Kebritchi,  M.  (2010).  Factors  affecting  teachers’  adoption  of  educational  computer games: 

A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 256–270. 

doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00921.x.

 

Kergroach, S. (2017). Industry 4.0: New challenges and opportunities for the labour market.   

Foresight   and   STI   Governance,   11(4),   6–8.   doi:   10.17323/2500- 2597.2017.4.6.8.

 

Kern, A. L., Wood, N. B., Roehrig, G. H., & Nyachwaya, J. (2010). A qualitative report of the ways 

high school chemistry students attempt to represent a chemical reaction at  the  atomic/molecular  

level.  Chemistry  Education  Research  and  Practice,  11, 165-172. doi:10.1039/c005465h.

 

Khan, B. (2012). User Interface design for virtual environments:Challenges and advances. Hershey: 

McWeadon Education.

 

Khan, A., Ahmad, F. H., & Malik, M. M. (2017). Use of digital game-based learning and gamification 

in secondary school science: The effect on student engagement, learning  and  gender  difference. 

Education  and  Information  Technologies, 22(6),

2767-2804. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9622-1.

 

Kibirige, I., Osodo, J., & Tlala, K. M. (2014). The effect of predict-observe-explain

strategy on learners’ misconceptions about dissolved salts. Mediterranean Journal of Social 

Sciences, 5(4), 300–310. doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n4p300

 

Kim,  B.  (2015).  Chapter  3:  Game  mechanics,  dynamics,  and  aesthetics.  Library Technology 

Reports, 51(2), 17-19.

 

Kim,  B.,  Park,  H.,  &  Baek.  (2009).  Not  just  fun,  but  serious  strategy:  Using  meta 

cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers and Education, 52(4), 800- 810.

 

Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to 

different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in       Science       

Teaching,       34(9),       949-968.       doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098- 

2736(199711)34:9<949::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-U.

 

Krathwohl,  D.R.,  Bloom,  B.S.,  &  Masia,  B.B.  (1964).  Taxanomy  of  Education Objectives: 

Handbook II. Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.

 

Kulkarni, V. D., Tambade, P. S. (2013). Enhancing the learning of Thermodynamics using computer 

assisted instructions at undergraduate level. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry 

Education, 5(1), 2-10.

 

Kumren,  A.,  &  Lee,  C.  N.  (2009). Q  &  A  for  matriculation  chemistry:  Semester  2 

updated. Selangor: Oxford Fajar.

 

Kwon, J. (2012). The development of educational and/or training computer games for students  with  

disabilities. Intervention  in  School  and  Clinic, 48(2),  87–98.  doi: 10.1177/1053451212449738.

 

Lau, K. P., & Chang, R. (2005). Physical chemistry for matriculation (Rev. ed.). Kuala Lumpur: 

McGraw-Hill.

 

Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother?

Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15, 146–151.

 

Lee, T.T. (2013). Pembinaan dan kerberkesanan modul multimedia interaktif dengan agen pedagogi 

dalam pembelajaran elektrokimia, (Unpublished doctorate thesis), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 

Bangi, Selangor.

 

Leinonen,  T.,  Keune,  A.,  Veermans,  M.,  &  Toikkanen,  T.  (2014). Mobile  apps  for 

reflection  in  learning:  A  design  research  in  K-12  education.  British  Journal  of 

Educational Technology, 47(1), 184–202.doi:10.1111/bjet.12224.

 

Libman, D., & Huang, L. (2013). Chemistry on the go: Review of chemistry apps on smartphones.      

Journal       of      Chemical      Education,      90(3),      320-325.

doi:10.1021/ed300329e.

 

Ling, T. M., Zaharah Aiyub., Brown, W. H., Foote, C. S., Masterton, W. L., & Hurley,

C.  N.  (2013).  Chemistry:  For  matriculation.  Petaling  Jaya,  Selangor:  Cangage Learning 

Asia.

 

Loh, K. K., & Kanai, R. (2016). How has the internet reshaped human cognition? The Neuroscientist, 

22(5), 506–520. doi:10.1177/1073858415595005.

 

Matriculation Division. (2017). Mision Matriculation education in Malaysia. Retrieved on Mac 20, 

2019, from https://www.moe.gov.my/index.php/my/korporat/jabatan- dan-bahagian/bahagian-matrikulasi.

 

Matriculation Division. (2018). Curriculum specifications chemistry (SK025). Kuala Lumpur: 

Matriculation Division.

 

Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: University of 

Cambridge.

 

Mayer,  R.  E.,  &  Johnson,  C.  I.  (2010).  Adding  instructional  features  that  promote 

learning in a game-like environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(3), 241–265. 

doi:10.2190/ec.42.3.a.

 

Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commision. (2017).   Hand phone users survey 2017. 

Cyberjaya: Malaysia Communication and multimedia commission.

 

Merchant,  Z.,  Goetz,  E.  T.,  Cifuentes,  L.,  Keeney-Kennicutt,  W.,  &  Davis,  T.  J. (2014). 

Effectiveness  of  virtual  reality-based  instruction  on  students’  learning outcomes in K-12 

and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40. 

doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033

 

Milenkovi?, D. D., Segedinac, M. D., & Hrin, T. N. (2014). Increasing  high school students’   

chemistry   performance   and   reducing   cognitive   load   through   an instructional  strategy  

based  on  the  interaction  of  multiple  levels  of  knowledge representation.     Journal     of 

    Chemical     Education,     91(9),     1409–1416. doi:10.1021/ed400805p.

 

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for 

processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.

 

Mills, G. E., Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysis 

and applications. United States: Pearson.

 

Mimi  Marzziana  Hamzah.  (2017).  Analisis  pencapaian  dan  tahap  motivasi  pelajar menggunakan 

koswer friend rescue game bagi tajuk asid dan bes. (Unpublished Master dissertation). Universiti 

Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim, Perak.

 

Ministry of Education. (2005). Curriculum specifications chemistry form 4. Retrieved April          

 22,           2019,           from           http://www.stsimon.edu.my/mn/wp-

content/uploads/2015/05/hsp_chemistry_f4.pdf.

 

Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya:

Ministry of Education.

 

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of 

modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358– 368. 

doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358.

 

Muliati  Sedek,  Yusri  Abdullah,  Jazihan  Mahat,  &  Norafaizuryana  Zainal  (2011). Individual  

characteristic  in  online  gaming  and  mobile  application  use  among students in higher 

education institution: A confirmatory factor analysis. Prosiding Seminar Majlis Dekan-Dekan 

Pendidikan Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi Awam, 1(1), 992-1005, Serdang, Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Muhd Ibrahim Muhamad Damanhuri, Kumar, L. D. P., Mohamad Termizi Borhan, Siti shamsiah Sani, & 

Hafsah Taha (2019). Evaluation of jigsaw puzzles in writing the chemical formula of ionic compounds 

among the 10th grade students. Journal of Physics:         Conference         Series,         1156, 

        012029. doi:10.1088/1742- 6596/1156/1/012029

 

Mulop, N., Yusof, K. M., & Tasir, Z. (2012). A review on enhancing the teaching and learning of 

thermodynamics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 703– 712. 

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.706

 

Naah,  B.  M.,  &  Sanger,  M.  J.  (2012).  Investigating  students’  understanding  of  the 

dissolving process. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 103–112. 

doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9379-7.

 

Naik, N. (2014). A  comparative  evaluation of game-based learning: Digital or non- digital  games? 

 Paper  presented  at  the European  Conference  on  Games  Based Learning; 2, 9-10 October 2014, 

Berlin, 437-445. Retrieved April 13, 2019, from https://search-proquest- 

com.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/docview/1674245527?accountid=13155.

 

Nik  Syaharudin  Nik  Daud,  Mohd  Mustamam  Abd  Karim,  Siti  Wan  Noraini  Wan Hassan,  &  

Nurulhuda  Abdul  Rahman  (2015).  Misconception  and  difficulties  in Introductory Physics among 

high school and university students: An overview in mechanics. Journal of Science, Mathematics and 

Technology, 2(1), 34–47.

 

Noor  Azman  Othman,    Mas  Anom  Abdul  Rashid,  Ida  Rosnita  Ismail,  Saifulrizan Norizan, 

Sarah Artiqah Mohamad Saad. (2019). Debunking Gen Z learning style: Malaysian chapter. 

International Journal of Advanced Research in Technology and Innovation,       1(2),       1-7.     

  Retrieved       January       11,       2020       from 

http://myjms.moe.gov.my/index.php/ijarti/article/view/6820.

 

Norehan Ali. (2015). Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan perisian multimedia paian  murid  

bermasalah  pendengaran  dalam  mata  pelajaran Pembantu   Penyedia   Makanan.   (Unpublished   master   dissertation).   Universiti

Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak.

 

Nyachwaya, J. M. (2012). College students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter  

across  reaction  the  particulate  nature  of  matter  across  reaction  types. Retrieved February 

15, 2020 from http://hdl.handle.net/11299/129692.

 

Nyachwaya, J. M., & Wood, N. B. (2014). Evaluation of chemical representations in physical 

chemistry textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 720–728. 

doi:10.1039/c4rp00113c.

 

Paas,  F.,  Renkl,  A.,  &  Sweller,  J.  (2004).  Cognitive  Load  Theory:  Instructional 

implications  of  the  interaction  between  information  structures  and  cognitive architecture.  

         Instructional           Science,           32(1/2),           1–8.           doi: 

10.1023/b:truc.0000021806.17516.d0.

 

Paas, F. G., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load   in   

instructional   research.   Perceptual   and   Motor   Skills,   79,   419-430 . 

doi:10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.419.

 

Peters, V., Vissers, G., & Heijne, G. (1998). The validity of games. Simulation and Gaming, 29(1), 

20–30. doi:10.1177/1046878198291003

 

Ping, G. L., Lok, C., Yeat, T. W., Cherynn, T. J., & Tan, E. S. (2018). Are chemistry educational 

apps useful? – A quantitative study with three in-house apps. Chemistry Education Research and 

Practice, 19(1), 15-23. doi:10.1039/c7rp00094d.

 

Prensky,  M.  (2001). Digital  natives,  digital  immigrants.  Place  of  publication  not 

identified: Marc Prensky.

 

Prensky,  M.  (2012).  From  digital  immigrants  and  digital  natives  to  digital  wisdom. 

Innovate,            5(3),            1–9.            http://marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky- 

Intro_to_From_DN_to_DW.pdf.

 

Pritchard, A. (2014). Ways of learning: Learning theories and learning styles in the classroom (3?? 

ed.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

 

Proctor, M. D., & Marks, Y. (2013). A survey of exemplar teachers' perceptions, use, and  access  

of  computer-based  games  and  technology  for  classroom  instruction. Journal          of        

  Computers          &          Education,          62,          171-180.

doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.022.

 

Qian, Y.F. (2009). An investigation of current online educational game. In R.E. Ferdig, (Eds.), 

Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 67- 82). Hershey, PA: 

Information Science Reference.

 

Ramadan, R., & Widyani, Y. (2013). Game development life cycle guidelines. 2013 International   

Conference   on   Advanced   Computer   Science   and   Information Systems,    ICACSIS    2013,    

    28-29    September    2013,    Bali,    Indonesia.,doi:10.1109/ICACSIS.2013.6761558

 

Ramnarain, U.,  & Joseph, A. (2012). Learning  difficulties experienced  by grade 12

South African students in the chemical representation of phenomena. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 13(4), 

462–470. doi: 10.1039/c2rp20071f

 

Rastegarpour, H., & Marashi, P. (2012). The effect of card games and computer games on learning of 

chemistry concepts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 597-601. 

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.111.

 

Richey, R. C. (1997). Research on instructional development. Educational Technology Research and 

Development, 45(3), 91–100. doi:10.1007/bf02299732.

 

Richey, R. C.  & Klein, J. D.  (2007).  Design and development research. New Jersey: Lawrence 

Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

 

Romiyatun, D. (2014). Developing mobile game “brainchemist” as senior high school/islamic senior 

high school chemistry learning media in the topics of solubility, solubility product. Research in 

Education Technology, Pedagogy & Technology, 8(1), 73–85.

 

Rothman, D. (2014). A tsunami of learners called Generation Z. Public Safety: A State of Mind, 

1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.

 

Rubijesmin   Abdul   Latif   (2007).   Understanding   Malaysian   students   as   gamers: 

Experience.   Proceedings   of   the   2nd   International   Conference   on   Digital Interactive 

Media in Entertainment and Arts - DIMEA ’07., 19-21 September 2007, Perth, Western Australia. 

doi:10.1145/1306813.1306843

 

Ryan, L. (2000). Advanced chemistry for you. United Kingdom: Nelson Thornes.

 

Salem, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals.  MIT Press: Cambridge, 

MA.

 

Sanchez,  J.  M.  P.  (2017).  Integrated  macro-micro-symbolic  approach  in  teaching secondary 

Chemistry. Kimika, 28(2), 22–29. doi:10.26534/kimika.v28i2.22-29

 

Sánchez-Mena,  A.,  &  Martí-Parreño,  J.  (2017).  Drivers  and  barriers  to  adopting 

gamification: Teachers’ perspectives. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 15(5), 434-443.

 

Sanger,   M.   (2005).   Evaluating   students’   conceptual   understanding   of   balanced 

equations and stoichiometric ratios using a particulate drawing. Journal Chemical Education, 82 

(1), 131−134.

 

Sreenivasulu & Subramaniam. (2013). University students’ understanding of chemical thermodynamics.  

International  Journal  of  Science  Education,  35(4),  601-635.

doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.683460

 

Seels,  B.  B.,  &  Richey,  R.  C.  (1994).  Instructional  technology:  The  definition  and

domains    of    the    field.    Washington,    DC:    Association    for    Educational 

Communications and Technology.

 

Shahroom,   A.   &   Hussin,   N.   (2018).   Industrial   revolution   4.0   and   education. 

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 314-319.

 

Shatto, B., & Erwin, K. (2016). Moving on from Gen Zs: Preparing for Generation Z. The    Journal   

 of    Continuing    Education    in    Nursing,    47(6),    253-254. 

doi:10.3928/00220124-20160518-05.

 

Simpson, E.J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor Domain. 

Washington DC: Gryphon House.

 

Simpson, J. M., & Elias, V. L. (2011). Choices and chances. Teaching Sociology, 39(1), 42-56. 

doi:10.1177/0092055x10390646.

 

Singhatanadgid, P. & Sripakagorn, A. (2012). Experience and student feedback from teaching  with  

guided  slides  on  a  tablet  PC.  ASEAN  Journal  of  Engineering Education, 1(1), 25–35.

 

Skalski,  P.,  &  Whitbred,  R.  (2010).  Image  versus  sound:  A  comparison  of  formal feature  

effects  on  presence  and  video  game  enjoyment. PsychNology  Journal, 8(1), 67–84.

 

Slavin, R.E. (1996). Education for all. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

 

Slavin,  R.  E.  (2015).  Educational  psychology:  Theory  and  practice.  New  Jersey: Pearson.

 

Smaldino, S.E., Lowther, D.L., & Russell, J.D. (2008). Instructional technology and media  for  

learning,  (9th Ed).  Upper  Saddle  River,  N.J:  Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.

 

Smaldone, R. A., Thompson, C. M., Evans, M., & Voit, W. (2016). Teaching science through video 

games. Nature Chemistry, 9(2), 97–102. doi:10.1038/nchem.2694

 

Snowman, J., & McCown, R. R. (2015). Psychology applied to teaching. Australia: Cengage learning.

 

Soegoto, H. (2019). Smartphone usage among college students. Journal of Engineering Science and 

Technology, 14(3), 1248–1259.

 

Sousa Lima, M. A., Monteiro, Á. C., Melo Leite Junior, A. J., De Andrade Matos, I. S., Alexandre, 

F. S. O., Nobre, D. J., … Da Silva Júnior, J. N. (2019). Game-based application  for  helping  

students  review  chemical  nomenclature  in  a  fun  way.

Journal of Chemical Education, 96, 801–805. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00540

 

Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2018). Implementation of game-transformed inquiry-

based   learning   to   promote   the   understanding   of   and   motivation   to   learn 

chemistry. Journal   of   Science   Education   and   Technology, 28(2),   152-164. 

doi:10.1007/s10956-018-9754-0.

 

Stallings,  W.  (2018). Operating  systems:  Internals  and  design  principles.  Harlow: Pearson.

 

Stefanova, C., Bob, Vadim, Chua, A., Yatendra, Sandy, Ikin, R., Rohit, Reza, Poul, Yusuf. (2018). 

Top 15 mobile game engines & development platforms / tools in 2019.  Retrieved  February  6,  2020, 

 from  https://thetool.io/2018/mobile-game- development-platforms

 

Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). When graphics improve liking but not learning from online    

lessons.    Computers    in    Human    Behavior,    28(2012),    1618–1625. 

doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.026

 

Suresh Kumar Joseph. (2012). The usage of digital games in learning biology among form four 

students in Malaysia. (Unpublished master thesis). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung 

Malim, Perak.

 

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design.

Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5.

 

Sweller,  J.  (2010).  Element  interactivity  and  intrinsic,  extraneous,  and  germane cognitive 

   load.    Educational    Psychology    Review,    22(2),    123–138.    doi: 

10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5.

 

Sweller,  J.,  Merriënboer,  J.  J.  G.  V.,  &  Paas,  F.  (2019).  Cognitive  architecture  and 

instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261– 292. doi: 

10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5.

 

Talanquer, V. (2010). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet.”   

International   Journal   of   Science   Education,   33(2),   179–195.   doi: 

10.1080/09500690903386435.

 

Tan, W. H. (2015). Gamifikasi dalam pendidikan pembelajaran berasaskan permainan.

Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Sultan Idris.

 

Tan,  Y.  T.,  &  Shamuganathan,  S.  (2015). Chemistry  for  matriculation:  Semester  2.

Shah Alam, Selangor: Oxford Fajar.

 

Taskin,  V.  &  Bernholt,  S.  (2014)  Students'  understanding  of  chemical  formulae:  A review 

of empirical research. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 157-185, doi: 

10.1080/09500693.2012.744492.

 

Tessmer, M., & Wedman, J. F. (1990). A layers-of-necessity instructional development model.   

Educational   Technology   Research   and   Development,   38(2),   77–85.

doi:10.1007/BF02298271

 

Traxler, J., & Wishart, J. (2011). Making mobile learning work: Case studies of practice.

Bristol: ESCalate.

 

Triboni, E., & Weber, G. (2018). MOL: Developing a European-style board game to teach organic 

chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(5), 791-803. Retrieved on            March            

10,            2019,            from            https://search-proquest- 

com.ezpustaka2.upsi.edu.my/docview/2093490951?accountid=13155.

 

Tsai, F., Tsai, C., & Lin, K. (2015). The evaluation of different gaming modes and feedback   types 

  on   game-based   formative   assessment   in   an   online   learning environment. Journal       

   Computers          &          Education, 81,          259-269.

doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.013.

 

Vaughan, T. (2014). Multimedia making it work. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

 

Wan   Fatimah   Wan   Ahmad,   &   Nabil   Fikri   Abdul   Rahman.(2014).   AKAMIA: Chemistry 

mobile game-based tutorial. 2014 3?? International Conference on User Science  and  Engineering  

(i-USEr),  2-5  September  2014,  Shah  Alam,  Malaysia. doi:10.1109/iuser.2014.7002706.

 

Westera, W. (2015). Games are motivating, aren´t they? Disputing the arguments for digital 

gamebased learning. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(2), Online publication                

                                                                                                at

http://journal.seriousgamessociety.org/index.php?journal=IJSG&page=article&op

=view&path%5B%5 D=58&path%5B%5D=pdf_17

 

White, T.L., McBurney, D.H. (2013). Research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning

 

Wiji, W., & Mulyani, S. (2018). Student’s mental model, misconceptions, troublesome knowledge, and 

threshold concept on thermochemistry with DToM-POE. Journal of      Physics:      Conference      

Series, 1013(1),      012098.      doi:10.1088/1742- 6596/1013/1/012098.

 

Winter,  J.  (2018).  Playing  with  chemistry.  Nature  Reviews  Chemistry,  2(5),  4–5. 

doi:10.1038/s41570-018-0006-x

 

Winter, J., Wentzel, M., & Ahluwalia, S. (2016). Chairs!: A mobile game for organic chemistry  

students  to  learn  the  ring  flip  of  cyclohexane.  Journal  of  Chemical Education, 93(9), 

1657-1659. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00872.

 

Wood,  J.,  &  Donnelly-Hermosillo,  D.  F.  (2019).  Learning  chemistry  nomenclature: Comparing  

the  use  of  an  electronic  game  versus  a  study  guide  approach. Computers              and   

           Education,              141,              103615–103757.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103615

 

Yang,  Y.  T.  C.  (2012).  Building  virtual  cities,  inspiring  intelligent  citizens:  Digital 

games for developing students’ problem solving and learning motivation. Journal Computers & 

Education, 59(2), 365–377.

 

Yitbarek,    S.    (2011).    Chemical    reaction:    diagnosis    and    toward    remedy    of 

misconceptions. African Journal of Chemical Education, 1(1), 10–28.

 

Yüksel. M, & Geban Ö. (2014). A study of the prediction of academic achievement in the Chemistry 

course. Education and Science, 39(173), 354-365.

 

Zaibon,     S.B. (2011).    Mobile     Game-Based     Learning     (mGBL)     Engineering Model. 

(Unpublished  doctorate  dissertation),  Universiti  Utara  Malaysia,  Sintok, Kedah.

 

Zaibon,  S.  B.,  &  Shiratuddin,  N.  (2009).  Towards  developing  mobile  game-based learning 

engineering model. 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information  Engineering.   Los  

Angeles,  USA,  31  March-2  April  2009,  IEEE,  , doi:10.1109/csie.2009.896.

 

Zamri   Mahamod   &   Noriah   Mohd   Ishak.   (2003). Analisis   Cohen   Kappa   dalam 

penyelidikan bahasa – satu pengalaman. Kertas Kerja Seminar Penyelidikan Guru Peringkat Kebangsaan. 

Kuching, 19 – 20 Ogos.

 

Zydney,  J.  M.,  &  Warner,  Z.  (2016).  Mobile  apps  for  science  learning:  Review  of

ters & Education, 94, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.001.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.