UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
The aim of this research is to phenomenologically engage with the graphite media
through drawing thus allowing the media to be disclosed in its poietic potentiality. The study also
aims to interpret the media as a meaning-making entity. Methodologically, the two main aspects in
this research, The Drawing and The Writing, were combined through the phenomenology method of
epoché and reduction introduced by Max van Manen. As such drawing becomes a way for the
graphite media to be understood through the unfolding of drawing experience.
Subsequently, reflection towards the artistic work and artworks through language becomes a
meaning-making structure in expounding essential meanings. The results of this study have
unconcealed the media through four series of drawing bodies which are Matter at hand, 2015,
Object-Tive TEXT, 2017, Reality hurts when you have nothing - Kuala Lumpur Biennale, 2017 and
Phantoms, 2018. In conclusion, forms of abstract and ambiguous, paradoxical and equality,
clear and unclear through lines that are erratic and grids, positive and negative have become
essential marking in the open engagement of graphite media. As an implication, this study
can be used as a foundation to understand the position of artistic
materials in artwork and meaning giving endeavor.
|
References |
Adiwijaya, D.R & Rahardja, A. (2015). Practice as ‘research’ within the context of art and design academia: A brief excursion into its philosophical underpinnings. Humaniora. Language, people, art and communication studies, 6. 325-333. Retrieved January 2, 2016 from http://research.binus.ac.id/journal/humaniora/edition/vol-6/issue-3/D75B8674- D487-4FAB-BFA4-70BC9E525D65/
Accame, G. M. (2006). Sol LeWitt, an idea transpiring. In Damiani Editor (Ed.) Sol LeWitt (p. 14-15). Bologna, Italy: Damiani.
An industrialist finds his fortune in Siberia. (n.d.). In Faber-Castle’s history of pencil. Retrieved November 12, 2015 from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad =rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiQ47zTxLPJAhVBT44KHfjEC0AQFggpMAI&u rl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.faber-castell.sg%2F~%2Fmedia%2FFaber- Castell%2Fbrochures%2Fen%2FPress%2FA%2520-brief-history-of-the- pencil.ashx&usg=AFQjCNHt23H8CIwlO9GJPC732GVfUBrzTQ&sig2=h_- JhvVz565WuV9YcQdhCw&bvm=bv.108194040,d.c2E
Andrew, O. (1983). Living materials. A sculptor’s handbook. California: University of California Press.
Ashton, A. (2014). Drawing phenomenological parallels through Practice-based research. Retrieved November 7, 2017 from http://acuads.com.au/wp- content/uploads/2014/12/Ashton_Alex paper.pdf
Barthes, R. (1979). Writing [Review of the books Cy Twombly: Works on Paper]. Whitney Museum. Retrieved September 27, 2016 from https://www.scribd.com/doc/92238108/Barthes-on-Cy-Twombly
Baldacchino, J. (2012). Preface: Scholarship and art’s ambiguous objects. In Daichendt, A. Artist scholar. Reflections on writing and research (p. xiii-p.xxiii). United Kingdom, UK: Intellect.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Towards an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Sign, 28 (3), 801-831.
Barnacle, R. (2009). Ways of being-with. In Grierson, E. & Brearley, L. (Eds.), Creative arts research. Narratives of methodologies and practices (p. 65-74). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
Barrett, E. (2007). Studio Enquiry and New Frontiers of Research. Studies in Material Thinking, 1. Retrieved November 23, 2015 from https://www.materialthinking.org/papers/38
Barrett, E. (2013). Materiality, affect, and the aesthetic image. In Barrett, E. & Bolt, B. (Eds.). Carnal knowledge. Towards a ‘New Materialism’ through the Art. (63- 72). New York, NY: I.B. Tauris.
Barrett, E. (2010). Introduction. In Barrett, E. & Bolt, B. (Eds.), Practice as research. Approaches to creative arts enquiry. (p. 1-13). New York, NY: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.
Barrett, T. (2011). Making art. Form and meaning. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Berrios, G. E. (1989). What is phenomenology? A review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 425-428.
Biro, M. (1998). Anselm Kiefer and the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bolt, B. (2007). Material thinking and the agency of Matter. Studies in Material Thinking, 1, 1-4. Retrieved November 23, 2015 from https://www.materialthinking.org/papers/37
Bolt, B. (2009). A Performative paradigm for the creative arts? Working Papers in Art and Design, 5, 1-12, Retrieved October 7, 2015 from http://www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/12417/WPIAAD_vol5_bolt. pdf
Bolt, B. (2014). Beyond solipsism in artistic research: The artwork and the work of art. In Barrett, E. & Bolt, B. (Eds.), Material inventions: Applying creative arts research. (p. 22-37). New York: I.B Tauris
Bolt, B. (2011). Heidegger reframed. London: I.B Tauris
Bolt, B. (2010). The magic is in the hand. In Barrett, E. & Bolt, B. (Eds.), Practice as research. Approaches to creative arts enquiry. (p. 27-34). New York, NY: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.
Bolt, B. (2004). Art beyond representation: The performative power of the image. London: I.B. Tauris.
Borgdorff, H. (2012). The conflict of the faculties. Perspectives on artistic research and academia. Amsterdam: Leiden University Press.
Braembussche, Van den. (2009). Thinking art. Brussels: Springer.
Braver, L. (2009). Heidegger's Later Writings: A Reader's Guide (Continuum Reader's Guides. New York, NY: Continuum
Brooks, M. (n.d). The lived experience of making a life drawing: Drawing Amy. Phenomenology online. Retrieved October 20, 2015 from http://www. phenomenologyonline.com/sources/textorium/brooks-margaret-the-lived- experience-of-making-a-life-drawing-drawing-amy/
Burton, J. (2005). Mystics rather than rationalists. In De Salvo, D. (Ed.), Open systems. (p. 65-79). London: Tate Publishing.
Busch, K. (2009). Artistic research and the poetics of knowledge. Art & research. A journal of ideas, contexts and methods. Retrieved November 9, 2015 from http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v2n2/busch.html
Calle, P. (1974). The Pencil. Ohio: North Light Books.
Callister, W. D. & Rethwisch, D. G. (2013). Materials Science and Engineering (9?? ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Carter, P. (2005). Material thinking. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.
Carey, S.S. (2011), A Beginner's Guide to Scientific Method (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
Cashdan, M. (2013). J. Parker Valentine. In editors of Phaidon (Eds.), Vitamin D2. New perspectives in drawing (p. 300-301). New York, NY: Phaidon
Cernuschi, C. & Herczynski, A. (2008). The Subversion of gravity in Jackson Pollock’s abstraction. Retrieved November 18, 2016 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20619641?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Cocker, E. (2013). Tactics for not knowing: Preparing for the unexpected. In Fisher, E. & Forthum, R. (Eds.), On not knowing: How artist think not. (p. 126-135). London, UK: Black Dog Publishing.
Cronin, B. (2017). Phenomenology of human understanding. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.
Crowell, S. (2011). Phenomenology and aesthetics; or why art matters. In Parry, J.D. (Ed.), Art and phenomenology. (p. 54-76). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Crowther, P. (2009). Phenomenology of the visual arts (even the frame). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
De Certeau, M. (1988). The Practice of Everyday Life, (Rendall, S. Trans). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1984)
Deleuze, G. ). Intellectuals and Power: A conversation between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze. In Michel Foucault (Author) and Bouchard, Donald F. (Ed). New York: Cornell University Press.
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition, (Patton, P. Trans.). London: Athlone Press. (Original work published 1968).
Dempsey, A (2010). Styles, Schools and Movements: The Essential Encyclopaedic Guide to Modern Art. United Kingdom: Thames & Hudson
Desmond, K (2011). Ideas about art. United Kingdom: Blackwell.
Dobler, J. (2014). Reflect/React/Redraw. Studies in Material Thinking,10, 1-18. Retrieved October 15, 2015 from https://www.materialthinking.org/papers/144
Doing phenomenology involves two types of inquiry activities: empirical and reflective methods. (n.d). In Phenomenology online. Retrieved from http://www.phenomenologyonline.com/inquiry/methods-procedures/
Donnet, J.B., and Bansal, R. C. (1993). Carbon black: Science and technology. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Dominique, J. (2000). Toward a minimalist phenomenology. Research in phenomenology, 30 , 89-106. Retrieved November 17, 2015 from http://search.proquest.com.ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/docview/1300040631? pq-origsite=summon
Early Graphite Discoveries. (n.d.). In Pencil.com. Retrieved December 18, 2015 from http://pencils.com/the-unleaded-pencil/
Elliot, M. (2007). Always between us: bodies, boundaries and liminal space. (Unpublished Master thesis). Monash University, Australia.
Fortnum, R. (2013). Creative accounting. Not knowing in talking and making. In Fisher, E. & Forthum, R. (Eds.), On knowing: How artist think not. (p. 70-87). London, UK: Black Dog Publishing.
Franck, F. (1973). The Zen of seeing – Seeing/Drawing as mediation. New York: Vintage books.
Galeri Chandan. (2017, January 3). Progress Repost presentation: Making the grades [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRG1J7WJ1kg
Glaser, M. (2008). Drawing is thinking. New York: Overlook Duckworth.
Gotthardt, A. (n.d). Cy Twombly: Biography. Retrieved October 01, 2016 from https://www.artsy.net/artist/cy-twombly
Goldstein, A. (2007). If it looks like a duck and it walks like a duck, it is probably a duck. In De Salvo, D. & Goldstein, A. (Eds.), As far as the eye can see. (p. 101- 160). Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Grbich, C. (2012). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction (2th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Graphite in the Arts. (n.d). In Asbury carbons. Retrieved March 3, 2017 from https://asbury.com/applications/graphite-in-the-arts/
Goble, E. (2017). Beyond Human Subjectivity and Back to the Things Themselves: Jane Bennett’s Vibrant Matter. Phenomenology & Practice. 2, 70-78. Retrieved December 15, 2017 from https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/pandpr/index.php/pandpr/article/view/29352/ 21364
Hagberg G.L. (1995). Art as Language: Wittgenstein, Meaning, and Aesthetic Theory. London: Cornell University Press.
Hannula, M., Suoranta, J., & Vaden, T. (2005). Artistic research. Theories, methods, and practices. Gothenburg, SE: Academy of Fine Arts, Helsinki Finland and University of Gothenburg/ ArtMonitor.
Hanrahan, S. (2006). Poiesis. In MacLeod, K. & Holdridge, L. (Eds.), Thinking through art. Reflections on art as research. (p. 143-155). New York: Routledge.
Harman, G. (2007). Heidegger explained. From phenomenon to thing. Peru, Illinois, US: Open Court Publishing Company.
Haseman, B. (2007). Rupture and Recognition: Identifying the performative research. In Barrett, E. & Bolt, B. (Eds.), Practice as research. Approaches to creative arts enquiry. (p. 147-158). New York, NY: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.
HB graphite scale. (n.d.). In Pencil.com. Retrieved December 18, 2015 from https://pencils.com/hb-graphite-grading-scale/
Heap, J. (1977). Toward a phenomenology of reading. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology. 8, 103-1 14. Retrieved February 15, 2016 from http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/156916277x0 0141
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. (Macquarrie, J & Robinson, E. Trans.) New York: Harper and Row. (Original work published 1926)
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. (Lovitt, W. Trans.) New York, NY: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1954)
Heidegger, M. (2008). The origin of the work of art. In Krell, D.F. (Ed.), (p. 139-212) Basic writings. New York: Harper Perennial. (Original work published 1935)
Hezekiah, G. A. (2010). Phenomenology’s material presence. Bristol, UK: Intellect.
Howes, P. & Laughlin, Z. (2012). Material matters. New materials in design. London: Black dog publishing.
Hunsberger, M. (n.d). The experience of re-reading. Phenomenology online. Retrieved Feb 15, 2016 from http://www.phenomenologyonline.com/sources/textorium/hunsberger-margaret- the-experience-of-re-reading/
Hurley, Clare. (2003, May 30). Andy Goldsworthy and the limits of working with nature. World socialist web site. Retrieved November 8, 2015 from https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2003/05/gold-m30.html
Insight. (n.d.). In Oxford advance learner‘s dictionary. Retrieved December 18, 2015 from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/ms/definisi/learner/insight
Insight. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster: Dictionary and Thesaurus. Retrieved December 18, 2015 from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insight
Jagodzinski, J., & Wallin, J. (2013). Arts-based research. A critique and a proposal. Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
Jena, R. (n.d). Off Gravity: Into Contemplation. Contemplate and enter the void at TC Liew’s solo exhibition. Time out. Retrieved January 22, 2016 from http://www.timeout.com/kuala-lumpur/art/off-gravity-into-contemplation-by- TC-Liew
Jones, R. (2013). On the value of not knowing: Wonder, beginning again and letting be. In Fisher, E. & Forthum, R. (Eds.), On not knowing: How artist think not. (p. 16-31). London, UK: Black Dog Publishing.
Kafle, N. P. (2011). Hermeneutic phenomenological research method simplified. Bodhi: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 181-200. Retrieved October 14, 2015 from http://www.ku.edu.np/bodhi/vol5_no1/11.%20Narayan%20Kafle.%20Hermene utic%20Phenomenological%20Research%20Method.pdf
Kaufer, S & Chemero, A (2015). Phenomenology; An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kearney, R. & Rainwater, M. (Eds). (1995). The continental philosophy reader. London: Routledge.
Knowledge. (n.d). In Oxford dictionaries online dictionary. Retrieved November 18, 2015 from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/knowledge
Kosuth, J. (1968). Notes on specific and general. In Guerico, G. (Ed.), (p. 11) Art after Philosophy and after: Collected writings. Massachusetts: Mit Press.
Kosuth, J. (1969). Art after philosophy. In Alberro, A. & Stimson, B. (Eds), (p. 158- 177). Massachusetts: Mit Press.
Kosuth, J. (1992). The play of the unmentionable: An Installation by Joseph Kosuth at the Brooklyn Museum. New York, NY: New Press.
Kozel, S. (2007). Closer. Performance, technologies, phenomenology. Massachusetts, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Lack, A. (2014). Martin Heidegger on technology, ecology, and the arts. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
LandmarksUT. (2013, June 5), Landmarks Features: Veronica Roberts on Sol LeWitt [Video file]. Retrieved September 23, 2016 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxwsndAiE1g
Lange-Berndt, P. (2015). Introduction. How to be complicit with materials. In Lange- Berndt, P. (Ed.), Materiality (p. 12-23). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
Leavy, P. (2009). Method meets art. Arts-based research practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Loxley, J. (2007). Performativity. London and New York: Routledge.
Lyotard, J.F. (1985). Les Immateriaux. In Lange-Berndt, P. (Ed.), Materiality (p. 201- 206). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
Moho-ha. (n.d). In Art terms – Mono-ha. Retrieved November 20, 2017 from http://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/m/mono-ha
Machi, L. A. & McEvoy, B. (2012). The literature review: Six steps to success (6th ed.). California, CA: Corwin.
Malpas, J. (2011) Objectivity and self-disclosedness. The phenomenological working of art. The magic is in the hand. In Parry, J.D. (Ed.), Art and phenomenology. (p. 54-76). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Many, E.W.R. (2013, February 7). Jackson Pollock Documentary [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfwUxQrDGqw
Maslen, M. & Southern, J. (2011). Drawing projects. An exploration of the language of drawing. London: Black dog publishing.
Martin, T (1999). Essential Surrealists. London: Dempsey Parr.
McGrath, S.J. (2014). The early Heidegger and medieval philosophy: Phenomenology for the Godforsaken. Pittsboro, NC: The Catholic University of America Press.
Mechanization, Innovation. (n.d.). In The online museum of Everyday life. Retrieved December 13, 2015 from http://museumofeverydaylife.org/exhibitions- collections/current-exhibitions/visual-history-of-the-pencil
Mitchell, A.J. (2010). Heidegger among the sculptors. Body, space, and the art of dwelling. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Mohd Nasir Ibrahim. (2015). Penyelidikan berasaskan studio: Teori dan amalam. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Galeri Petronas.
Morley, S (2003). Writing on the Wall. United Kingdom: Thames & Hudson.
Morris, R. (1968). Anti Form. In Lange-Berndt, P. (Ed.), Materiality (p. 92-93). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. California: Sage Publication Inc.
Munroe, A (2009). The third mind. American Artists Contemplate Asia, 1860-1989. New York: Guggenheim Museum Publications.
Nature as Material: An exhibition of sculpture and photographs purchased for the Arts Council collection by Andrew Causey, The Atkinson Gallery, Southport, Lancashire, 5 July - 8 August 1980. (n.d). Retrieved September 23, 2015 from http://www.goldsworthy.cc.gla.ac.uk/extracts/Nelms, H. (1981). Thinking with a Pencil. United States: Girard & Stewart.
Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as research in the arts. Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nietzsche, F. (1992). Ecce homo. (Hollingdale, R. J. Trans.) London: Penguin classic. (Original work published 1908) Wignesan
Nichtsundnull. (2012, December 12). Graham Harman. Art and Paradox 01 [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRLw0uyZMFo
Ockvirk, G (2006). Art fundamentals: Theory and Practice (Tenth edition). New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Off Gravity: Into contemplation. A drawing exhibition. (2014, April 1). Retrieved January 23, 2015 from http://www.elle.my/my-elle-club/Sales-and-Events/Off- Gravity-Into-Contemplation-A-Drawing-Exhibition
Parry, J.D. & Warthall, M. (2011). Introduction. In Parry, J.D (Ed.) Art and phenomenology (p. 1-8). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Pallasmaa, J. (2009). The thinking hand. Existential and embodied wisdom in architecture. West Sussex, U.K: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Pencil. (n.d.). In how products are made. Retrieved December 20, 2015 from http://www.madehow.com/Volume-1/Pencil.html
Pencil myths. (n.d.). In Pencil.com. Retrieved December 18, 2015 from http://pencils.com/the-unleaded-pencil/
Petherbridge, D. (2011). The primacy of drawing. Histories and theories of practice. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Petroski, H. (1989). The Pencil. A history of design and circumstance. New York: Alfred A. knopf.
Phenomenology. (n.d.). In Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. Retrieved October 16, 2015 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/
Poiesis. (n.d.). In Oxford dictionaries online dictionary. Retrieved November 18, 2015 from http://www..com/definition/english/poiesis?q=Poiesis
Poiesis. (n.d.). In Online Ethnology Dictionary. Retrieved November 18, 2015 from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=-poietic&allowed_in_frame=
Rahtz, D. (2012). Indifference of material in the work of Carl Andre and Robert Smithson. Lange-Berndt, P. (Ed.), Materiality (p. 67-71). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
Rees, D (2012). How to sharpen pencils. A practical and theoretical treatise on the artisanal craft of pencil sharpening. New York: Melville House Publishing.
Reinhardt, A. (1962). Art-as-art. In Farrow, C. (Ed.), Art & Design: A. Reinhardt, J. Kosuth, F. Gonzalez-Torres. A symptoms of interference, conditions of possibility (p. 21-23). Cambridge: VCH Publisher.
Reinhardt, A. (1957). Twelve rules for a new academy. In Farrow, C. (Ed.), Art & Design: A. Reinhardt, J. Kosuth, F. Gonzalez-Torres. A symptoms of interference, conditions of possibility (p. 25-27). Cambridge: VCH Publisher.
Rolling, J.H. (2013). Arts-based research. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Sale, T. & Betti, C. (2007). Drawing. A contemporary Approach. United States: Thomson Wadsworth.
Saorsa, J. (2009). Drawing on conversation. Drawing as method of exploring and interpreting ordinary verbal interaction: An investigation through contemporary practice. Berlin: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.
Schwabsky, B. (2005). Roland Flexner. In Dexter, E. (Ed), Vitamin D. New perspectives in drawing (p. 108-109). New York, NY: Phaidon.
Scrivener, S. (2002). In The Art Object Does Not Embody a Form of Knowledge. Retrieved October 31, 2017 from http://www.herts.ac.uk/ artdes1/research/papers/wpades/vol2/scrivenerfull.html
Sholis, B. (2005). Jim Hodges. In Grosenick, U. (Ed), Art now. Vol 2 (p. 208-211). Cologne, Germany; Taschen.
Slager, H. (2009). Art and Method. In Elkins, J. (Ed.), Artist with PhDs. On the new Doctoral Degree in Studio Art. (p. 49-56). Washington, DC: New Academia Publishing.
Smith, H. (2003). Scientism: The bedrock of the Modern worldview. In Mehrdad M. Z. (Ed.), Science and the myth of progress (p. 233-248). Bloomington: World Wisdom Inc.
Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sugiharto, B. (2015). Wot batu. The bridge of the soul. Wot batu. Sunaryo’s stones bridge. A passage through wood, water, wind and soul, 20-25. Jakarta: Imaji media pustaka.
Sullivan, G. (2010). Art practice as research. Inquiry in visual arts. California, USA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Thayer, Peggy. (2003). The experience of being creative as a spiritual practice. A Hermeneutic-phenomenological study (Revisioning philosophy). USA: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.
The basics of philosophy. (n.d.). Retrieved October 16, 2015 from http://www.philosophybasics.com/branch_phenomenology.html
The exquisite process of Jeff Koons. (2015, July 21). In Christie’s. The art people.Retrieved November 19, 2015 from http://www.christies.com/features/Jeff-Koons-in-Bilbao-6348-1.aspx
The first quality German pencil. (n.d.). In Faber-Castle’s History of Pencil. Retrieved December 15, 2015 from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad =rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiQ47zTxLPJAhVBT44KHfjEC0AQFggpMAI&u rl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.faber-castell.sg%2F~%2Fmedia%2FFaber- Castell%2Fbrochures%2Fen%2FPress%2FA%2520-brief-history-of-the- pencil.ashx&usg=AFQjCNHt23H8CIwlO9GJPC732GVfUBrzTQ&sig2=h_- JhvVz565WuV9YcQdhCw&bvm=bv.108194040,d.c2E
The Monthly Video. (2013, May 2). Key Thinkers: Barbara Bolt on Martin Heidegger. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3RV2tcNy1c
The manufacturing process: Processing the graphite. (n.d.). In How Products Are Made. Retrieved November 18, 2015 from http://www.madehow.com/Volume- 1/Pencil.html
Thompson, C. (2006, 31 July). Art practice as research: A review essay. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 7, 1-12. http://www.ijea.org/v7r3/v7r3.pdf
Toynton, E (2012). Jackson Pollock. United States: Yale University Press.
Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice. Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Wagner, H. (2005). House of mud. In Lange-Berndt, P. (Ed.), Materiality (p. 79-82). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
Wentworth, N. (2004). The phenomenology of painting. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Wignesan, T. (2008). Poietics: Disquisitions on the art of creation. Allahabad: Cyberwit.net
Whicher, R.M. (1997). Drawing from observation: A phenomenological inquiry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Whitehead, D. H. (2003). Poiesis and art-making: A Way of Letting-Be. Contemporary Aesthetics Journal. vol. 1. Retrieved November 18, 2015 from https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/ca/7523862.0001.005/--poiesis-and-art-making-a- way-of-letting-be?rgn=main;view=fulltext
Young, J. (2001). Heidegger’s philosophy of art. New York, NY: Cambridge University press.
Young, S. (n.d.). Pencil: Grading of Pencil. Retrieved December 18, 2015 from http://www.unm.edu/~odette86/219/SunYoung_2_Definition_pdf.pdf
van Manen, Michele & van Manen, Max. (2014). Phenomenology. Encyclopedia of Educational Theory and Philosophy, 610-616. Retrieved October 31, 2017 from http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483346229.n253
Vergine, L (1996). Art on the Cutting Edge. Milano: Skira.
_(2015). William Anastasi: Reinventing drawing. In Van Cauteren, P. & Germann, M. (Eds.), Drawing. The bottom line (p.148-151). Brussels: Mercatfonds.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |