UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :N Fine Arts
Main Author :Mohd Fuad Md Arif
Title :Phenomenology of material:An engagement with graphite media through drawing as poietic revealing
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
Year of Publication :2018
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
The  aim  of  this  research  is  to  phenomenologically  engage  with  the  graphite  media through drawing thus allowing the media to be disclosed in its poietic potentiality. The study also  aims to interpret the media as a meaning-making entity. Methodologically, the two main aspects in  this research, The Drawing and The Writing, were combined through the phenomenology method of  epoché and reduction introduced by Max van Manen.  As  such  drawing  becomes  a  way  for  the   graphite  media  to  be  understood through  the  unfolding  of  drawing  experience.   Subsequently,  reflection  towards  the artistic work and artworks through language becomes a  meaning-making structure in expounding essential meanings. The results of this study have  unconcealed the media through four series of drawing bodies which  are  Matter at hand, 2015,  Object-Tive TEXT, 2017, Reality hurts when you have nothing - Kuala Lumpur Biennale, 2017 and  Phantoms,  2018.  In  conclusion,  forms  of  abstract  and  ambiguous,  paradoxical  and equality,  clear and unclear through lines that are erratic and grids, positive and negative have  become   essential  marking  in  the  open  engagement  of  graphite  media. As  an implication, this study  can be used as a foundation to understand the position of artistic materials in artwork and meaning giving endeavor.  

References

Adiwijaya, D.R & Rahardja, A. (2015). Practice as ‘research’ within the context of art

and  design  academia:  A  brief  excursion  into  its  philosophical  underpinnings. Humaniora.  

Language,  people,  art  and  communication  studies,  6.  325-333. Retrieved                     

January                    2,                     2016                     from 

http://research.binus.ac.id/journal/humaniora/edition/vol-6/issue-3/D75B8674- 

D487-4FAB-BFA4-70BC9E525D65/

 

Accame, G. M. (2006). Sol LeWitt, an idea transpiring. In Damiani Editor (Ed.) Sol LeWitt (p. 

14-15).  Bologna, Italy: Damiani.

 

An industrialist finds his fortune in Siberia. (n.d.). In Faber-Castle’s history of pencil. 

Retrieved                   November                   12,                   2015                   

from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad

=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiQ47zTxLPJAhVBT44KHfjEC0AQFggpMAI&u 

rl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.faber-castell.sg%2F~%2Fmedia%2FFaber- 

Castell%2Fbrochures%2Fen%2FPress%2FA%2520-brief-history-of-the- 

pencil.ashx&usg=AFQjCNHt23H8CIwlO9GJPC732GVfUBrzTQ&sig2=h_- 

JhvVz565WuV9YcQdhCw&bvm=bv.108194040,d.c2E

 

Andrew, O. (1983). Living materials. A sculptor’s handbook. California: University of California 

Press.

 

Ashton,  A.  (2014).  Drawing  phenomenological  parallels  through   Practice-based research.    

Retrieved    November    7,    2017    from    http://acuads.com.au/wp- 

content/uploads/2014/12/Ashton_Alex    paper.pdf

 

Barthes,  R.  (1979).  Writing [Review  of  the  books  Cy Twombly:  Works  on  Paper]. Whitney     

   Museum.        Retrieved        September        27,        2016        from 

https://www.scribd.com/doc/92238108/Barthes-on-Cy-Twombly

 

Baldacchino, J. (2012). Preface: Scholarship and art’s ambiguous objects. In Daichendt,

A.  Artist  scholar.  Reflections  on  writing  and  research  (p.  xiii-p.xxiii).  United Kingdom, 

UK: Intellect.

 

Barad,  K.  (2003).  Posthumanist  performativity:  Towards  an  understanding  of  how matter 

comes to matter. Sign, 28 (3), 801-831.

 

Barnacle,  R.  (2009).  Ways  of  being-with.  In  Grierson,  E.  &  Brearley,  L.  (Eds.), 

Creative  arts  research.  Narratives  of  methodologies  and  practices  (p.  65-74). Rotterdam, 

NL: Sense Publishers.

 

Barrett, E. (2007). Studio Enquiry and New Frontiers of Research. Studies in Material Thinking,     

     1.          Retrieved          November          23,          2015          from

https://www.materialthinking.org/papers/38

 

Barrett, E. (2013). Materiality, affect, and the aesthetic image. In Barrett, E. & Bolt, B.

(Eds.). Carnal knowledge. Towards a ‘New Materialism’ through the Art. (63- 72). New York, NY: I.B. 

Tauris.

 

Barrett, E. (2010). Introduction. In Barrett, E. & Bolt, B. (Eds.), Practice as research. 

Approaches to creative arts enquiry. (p. 1-13). New York, NY: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.

 

Barrett, T. (2011). Making art. Form and meaning. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

 

Berrios, G. E. (1989). What is phenomenology? A review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 

425-428.

 

Biro, M. (1998). Anselm Kiefer and the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. New York: Cambridge 

University Press.

 

Bolt,  B.  (2007).  Material  thinking  and  the  agency  of  Matter.  Studies  in  Material 

Thinking,       1,       1-4.       Retrieved       November       23,       2015       from 

https://www.materialthinking.org/papers/37

 

Bolt, B. (2009). A Performative paradigm for the creative arts? Working Papers in Art and       

Design,       5,       1-12,       Retrieved       October       7,       2015       from 

http://www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/12417/WPIAAD_vol5_bolt. pdf

 

Bolt, B. (2014). Beyond solipsism in artistic research: The artwork and the work of art. In  

Barrett,  E.  &  Bolt,  B.  (Eds.),  Material  inventions:  Applying  creative  arts research. (p. 

22-37). New York: I.B Tauris

 

Bolt, B. (2011). Heidegger reframed. London: I.B Tauris

 

Bolt, B. (2010). The magic is in the hand. In Barrett, E. & Bolt, B. (Eds.), Practice as research. 

Approaches to creative arts enquiry. (p. 27-34). New York, NY: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.

 

Bolt,  B.  (2004).  Art  beyond  representation:  The  performative  power  of  the  image.

London: I.B. Tauris.

 

Borgdorff, H. (2012). The conflict of the faculties. Perspectives on artistic research and 

academia. Amsterdam: Leiden University Press.

 

Braembussche, Van den. (2009). Thinking art. Brussels: Springer.

 

Braver, L. (2009). Heidegger's Later Writings: A Reader's Guide (Continuum Reader's Guides. New 

York, NY: Continuum

 

Brooks,  M.  (n.d).  The  lived  experience  of  making  a  life  drawing:  Drawing  Amy. 

Phenomenology   online.    Retrieved   October   20,   2015   from   http://www. 

phenomenologyonline.com/sources/textorium/brooks-margaret-the-lived-

experience-of-making-a-life-drawing-drawing-amy/

 

Burton, J. (2005). Mystics rather than rationalists. In De Salvo, D. (Ed.), Open systems.

(p. 65-79). London: Tate Publishing.

 

Busch, K. (2009). Artistic research and the poetics of knowledge. Art & research. A journal  of  

ideas,  contexts  and  methods.  Retrieved  November  9,  2015  from 

http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v2n2/busch.html

 

Calle, P. (1974). The Pencil. Ohio: North Light Books.

 

Callister, W. D. & Rethwisch, D. G. (2013). Materials Science and Engineering (9?? ed.). New York, 

NY: John Wiley & Sons.

 

Carter, P. (2005). Material thinking. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing. 

 

Carey, S.S. (2011), A Beginner's Guide to Scientific Method (4th ed.). Boston, MA:

Wadsworth.

 

Cashdan, M. (2013). J. Parker Valentine. In editors of Phaidon (Eds.), Vitamin D2. New perspectives 

in drawing (p. 300-301). New York, NY: Phaidon

 

Cernuschi, C. & Herczynski, A. (2008). The Subversion of gravity in Jackson Pollock’s abstraction.  

              Retrieved                November                18,                2016

from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20619641?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

 

Cocker, E. (2013). Tactics for not knowing: Preparing for the unexpected. In Fisher, E. &  Forthum, 

 R.  (Eds.),  On  not  knowing:  How  artist  think  not.  (p.  126-135). London, UK: Black Dog 

Publishing.

 

Cronin, B. (2017). Phenomenology of human understanding. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.

 

Crowell, S. (2011). Phenomenology and aesthetics; or why art matters. In Parry, J.D. (Ed.), Art and 

phenomenology. (p. 54-76). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

 

Crowther,  P.  (2009).  Phenomenology  of  the  visual  arts  (even  the  frame).  Stanford: 

Stanford University Press.

 

De Certeau, M. (1988). The Practice of Everyday Life, (Rendall, S. Trans). Berkeley: University of 

California Press. (Original work published 1984)

 

Deleuze, G.  ). Intellectuals and Power: A conversation between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze. 

In Michel Foucault (Author) and Bouchard, Donald F. (Ed). New York: Cornell University Press.

 

Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition, (Patton, P. Trans.).  London: Athlone Press. 

(Original work published 1968).

 

Dempsey,  A  (2010).  Styles,  Schools  and  Movements:  The  Essential  Encyclopaedic

Guide to Modern Art. United Kingdom: Thames & Hudson

 

Desmond, K (2011). Ideas about art. United Kingdom: Blackwell.

 

Dobler,  J.  (2014).  Reflect/React/Redraw.  Studies  in  Material  Thinking,10,  1-18.

Retrieved October 15, 2015 from https://www.materialthinking.org/papers/144

 

Doing phenomenology involves two types of inquiry activities: empirical and reflective methods.     

  (n.d).       In       Phenomenology       online.       Retrieved       from 

http://www.phenomenologyonline.com/inquiry/methods-procedures/

 

Donnet, J.B., and Bansal, R. C. (1993). Carbon black: Science and technology. New York: Marcel 

Dekker, Inc.

 

Dominique,    J.    (2000).    Toward    a    minimalist    phenomenology.    Research    in 

phenomenology,    30 ,    89-106.    Retrieved    November    17,    2015     from 

http://search.proquest.com.ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/docview/1300040631? pq-origsite=summon

 

Early Graphite Discoveries. (n.d.). In Pencil.com. Retrieved December 18, 2015 from 

http://pencils.com/the-unleaded-pencil/

 

Elliot,   M.   (2007).   Always   between   us:   bodies,   boundaries   and   liminal   space.

(Unpublished Master thesis). Monash University, Australia.

 

Fortnum,  R.  (2013).  Creative  accounting.  Not  knowing  in  talking  and  making.  In Fisher, 

E. & Forthum, R. (Eds.), On knowing: How artist think not. (p. 70-87). London, UK: Black Dog 

Publishing.

 

Franck,  F.  (1973).  The  Zen  of  seeing  –  Seeing/Drawing  as  mediation.  New  York: Vintage 

books.

 

Galeri Chandan. (2017, January 3). Progress Repost presentation: Making the grades

[Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRG1J7WJ1kg 

 

Glaser, M. (2008). Drawing is thinking. New York: Overlook Duckworth.

 

Gotthardt,  A.  (n.d).  Cy  Twombly:  Biography.  Retrieved  October  01,  2016  from 

https://www.artsy.net/artist/cy-twombly

 

Goldstein, A. (2007). If it looks like a duck and it walks like a duck, it is probably a duck. In 

De Salvo, D. & Goldstein, A. (Eds.), As far as the eye can see. (p. 101- 160). Connecticut: Yale 

University Press.

 

Grbich, C. (2012). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction (2th ed.). London: Sage Publications.

 

Graphite  in  the  Arts.  (n.d).  In  Asbury  carbons.  Retrieved  March  3,  2017  from 

https://asbury.com/applications/graphite-in-the-arts/

 

Goble, E. (2017). Beyond Human Subjectivity and Back to the Things Themselves: Jane Bennett’s 

Vibrant Matter. Phenomenology & Practice. 2, 70-78. Retrieved December                              

 15,                               2017                               from https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/pandpr/index.php/pandpr/article/view/29352/

21364

 

Hagberg G.L. (1995). Art as Language: Wittgenstein, Meaning, and Aesthetic Theory.

London: Cornell University Press.

 

Hannula, M., Suoranta, J., & Vaden, T. (2005). Artistic research. Theories, methods, and  

practices.  Gothenburg,  SE:  Academy  of  Fine  Arts,  Helsinki  Finland  and University of 

Gothenburg/ ArtMonitor.

 

Hanrahan, S. (2006). Poiesis. In MacLeod, K. & Holdridge, L. (Eds.), Thinking through art. 

Reflections on art as research. (p. 143-155). New York: Routledge.

 

Harman, G. (2007). Heidegger explained. From phenomenon to thing. Peru, Illinois, US: Open Court 

Publishing Company.

 

Haseman, B. (2007). Rupture and Recognition: Identifying the performative research. In Barrett, E. 

& Bolt, B. (Eds.), Practice as research. Approaches to creative arts enquiry. (p. 147-158). New 

York, NY: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.

 

HB   graphite   scale.   (n.d.).   In   Pencil.com.   Retrieved   December   18,   2015   from 

https://pencils.com/hb-graphite-grading-scale/

 

Heap, J. (1977). Toward a phenomenology of reading. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology.     8,  

   103-1     14.      Retrieved     February     15,     2016     from 

http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/156916277x0 0141

 

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. (Macquarrie, J & Robinson, E. Trans.) New York: Harper and 

Row. (Original work published 1926)

 

Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. (Lovitt, W. Trans.) New York, NY: Harper 

& Row. (Original work published 1954)

 

Heidegger, M. (2008). The origin of the work of art. In Krell, D.F. (Ed.), (p. 139-212)

Basic writings. New York: Harper Perennial. (Original work published 1935)

 

Hezekiah, G. A. (2010). Phenomenology’s material presence. Bristol, UK: Intellect. 

 

Howes, P. & Laughlin, Z. (2012). Material matters. New materials in design. London:

Black dog publishing.

 

Hunsberger, M. (n.d). The experience of re-reading. Phenomenology online. Retrieved Feb             

                     15,                                  2016                                  

from http://www.phenomenologyonline.com/sources/textorium/hunsberger-margaret- 

the-experience-of-re-reading/

 

Hurley,  Clare.  (2003,  May  30).  Andy  Goldsworthy  and  the  limits  of  working  with nature.  

 World   socialist   web   site.   Retrieved   November   8,   2015   from

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2003/05/gold-m30.html

 

Insight. (n.d.). In Oxford advance learner‘s dictionary. Retrieved December 18, 2015

from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/ms/definisi/learner/insight

 

Insight. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster: Dictionary and Thesaurus. Retrieved December 18, 2015 from 

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insight

 

Jagodzinski, J., & Wallin, J. (2013). Arts-based research. A critique and a proposal.

Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.

 

Jena, R. (n.d). Off Gravity: Into Contemplation. Contemplate and enter the void at TC Liew’s   solo 

  exhibition.   Time   out.   Retrieved   January   22,   2016   from 

http://www.timeout.com/kuala-lumpur/art/off-gravity-into-contemplation-by- TC-Liew

 

Jones, R. (2013). On the value of not knowing: Wonder, beginning again and letting be. In Fisher, 

E. & Forthum, R. (Eds.), On not knowing: How artist think not. (p. 16-31). London, UK: Black Dog 

Publishing.

 

Kafle,  N.  P.  (2011).  Hermeneutic  phenomenological  research  method  simplified. Bodhi: An 

Interdisciplinary Journal, 181-200. Retrieved October 14, 2015 from 

http://www.ku.edu.np/bodhi/vol5_no1/11.%20Narayan%20Kafle.%20Hermene 

utic%20Phenomenological%20Research%20Method.pdf

 

Kaufer, S & Chemero, A (2015). Phenomenology; An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.

 

Kearney,  R.  &  Rainwater,  M.  (Eds).  (1995).  The  continental  philosophy  reader.

London: Routledge.

 

Knowledge. (n.d). In Oxford dictionaries online dictionary. Retrieved November 18, 2015 from 

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/knowledge

 

Kosuth, J. (1968). Notes on specific and general. In Guerico, G. (Ed.), (p. 11) Art after 

Philosophy and after: Collected writings. Massachusetts: Mit Press.

 

Kosuth, J. (1969). Art after philosophy. In Alberro, A. & Stimson, B. (Eds), (p. 158- 177). 

Massachusetts: Mit Press.

 

Kosuth, J. (1992). The play of the unmentionable: An Installation by Joseph Kosuth at the Brooklyn 

Museum. New York, NY: New Press.

 

Kozel, S. (2007). Closer. Performance, technologies, phenomenology. Massachusetts, USA: 

Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

 

Lack, A. (2014). Martin Heidegger on technology, ecology, and the arts. New York, NY: Palgrave 

Macmillan.

 

LandmarksUT. (2013, June 5), Landmarks Features: Veronica Roberts on Sol LeWitt [Video         

file].         Retrieved          September          23,         2016         from

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxwsndAiE1g

 

Lange-Berndt, P. (2015). Introduction. How to be complicit with materials. In Lange-

Berndt, P. (Ed.), Materiality (p. 12-23). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.

 

Leavy,  P.  (2009).  Method  meets  art.  Arts-based  research  practice.  London:  Jessica 

Kingsley Publishers.

 

Loxley, J. (2007). Performativity. London and New York: Routledge.

 

Lyotard, J.F. (1985). Les Immateriaux. In Lange-Berndt, P. (Ed.), Materiality (p. 201- 206). 

Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.

 

Moho-ha.  (n.d).  In  Art  terms  –  Mono-ha.  Retrieved  November  20,  2017  from 

http://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/m/mono-ha

 

Machi, L. A. & McEvoy, B. (2012). The literature review: Six steps to success (6th ed.). 

California, CA: Corwin.

 

Malpas, J. (2011) Objectivity and self-disclosedness. The phenomenological working of art. The 

magic is in the hand. In Parry, J.D. (Ed.), Art and phenomenology. (p. 54-76). London: Routledge 

Taylor & Francis Group.

 

Many,  E.W.R.  (2013,  February  7).  Jackson  Pollock  Documentary  [Video  file].

Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfwUxQrDGqw

 

Maslen, M. & Southern, J. (2011). Drawing projects. An exploration of the language of drawing. 

London: Black dog publishing.

 

Martin, T (1999). Essential Surrealists. London: Dempsey Parr.

 

McGrath, S.J. (2014). The early Heidegger and medieval philosophy: Phenomenology for the 

Godforsaken. Pittsboro, NC: The Catholic University of America Press.

 

Mechanization, Innovation. (n.d.). In The online museum of Everyday life. Retrieved December     

13,     2015     from     http://museumofeverydaylife.org/exhibitions- 

collections/current-exhibitions/visual-history-of-the-pencil

 

Mitchell,  A.J.  (2010).  Heidegger  among  the  sculptors.  Body,  space,  and  the  art  of 

dwelling. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

 

Mohd  Nasir  Ibrahim.  (2015).  Penyelidikan  berasaskan  studio:  Teori  dan  amalam.

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Galeri Petronas.

 

Morley, S (2003). Writing on the Wall. United Kingdom: Thames & Hudson.

 

Morris,  R.  (1968).  Anti  Form.  In  Lange-Berndt,  P.  (Ed.),  Materiality  (p.  92-93).

Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.

 

Moustakas,   C.   (1994).   Phenomenological   research   methods.   California:   Sage

Publication Inc.

 

Munroe, A (2009). The third mind. American Artists Contemplate Asia, 1860-1989.

New York: Guggenheim Museum Publications.

 

Nature as Material: An exhibition of sculpture and photographs purchased for the Arts Council   

collection   by   Andrew   Causey,   The   Atkinson   Gallery,   Southport, Lancashire, 5 July - 8 

August 1980. (n.d). Retrieved September 23, 2015 from 

http://www.goldsworthy.cc.gla.ac.uk/extracts/Nelms, H. (1981). Thinking with a Pencil. United 

States: Girard & Stewart.

 

Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as research in the arts. Principles, protocols, pedagogies, 

resistances. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

 

Nietzsche, F. (1992). Ecce homo. (Hollingdale, R. J. Trans.) London: Penguin classic. (Original 

work published 1908) Wignesan

 

Nichtsundnull. (2012, December 12). Graham Harman. Art and Paradox 01 [Video file]. Retrieved from 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRLw0uyZMFo

 

Ockvirk, G (2006). Art fundamentals: Theory and Practice (Tenth edition). New York: Mc Graw Hill.

 

Off  Gravity:  Into  contemplation.  A  drawing  exhibition.  (2014,  April  1).  Retrieved January 

23,  2015  from  http://www.elle.my/my-elle-club/Sales-and-Events/Off- 

Gravity-Into-Contemplation-A-Drawing-Exhibition

 

Parry,  J.D.  &  Warthall,  M.   (2011).   Introduction.   In  Parry,  J.D  (Ed.)  Art  and 

phenomenology (p. 1-8). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

 

Pallasmaa,  J.  (2009).   The  thinking  hand.  Existential  and  embodied   wisdom  in 

architecture. West Sussex, U.K: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

 

Pencil.  (n.d.).  In  how  products  are  made.  Retrieved  December  20,  2015  from 

http://www.madehow.com/Volume-1/Pencil.html

 

Pencil    myths.    (n.d.).    In    Pencil.com.    Retrieved    December    18,    2015    from 

http://pencils.com/the-unleaded-pencil/

 

Petherbridge, D. (2011). The primacy of drawing. Histories and theories of practice.

New Haven & London: Yale University Press.

 

Petroski,  H.  (1989).  The  Pencil.  A  history  of  design  and  circumstance.  New  York: Alfred 

A. knopf.

 

Phenomenology. (n.d.).  In Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. Retrieved October 16, 2015 from 

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/

 

Poiesis. (n.d.). In Oxford dictionaries online dictionary. Retrieved November 18, 2015 from 

http://www..com/definition/english/poiesis?q=Poiesis

 

Poiesis. (n.d.). In Online Ethnology Dictionary. Retrieved November 18, 2015 from

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=-poietic&allowed_in_frame=

 

Rahtz,  D.  (2012).  Indifference  of  material  in  the  work  of  Carl  Andre  and  Robert

Smithson. Lange-Berndt, P. (Ed.), Materiality (p. 67-71). Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.

 

Rees, D (2012). How to sharpen pencils. A practical and theoretical treatise on the artisanal craft 

of pencil sharpening. New York: Melville House Publishing.

 

Reinhardt, A. (1962). Art-as-art. In Farrow, C. (Ed.), Art & Design: A. Reinhardt, J. Kosuth, F. 

Gonzalez-Torres. A symptoms of interference, conditions of possibility (p. 21-23). Cambridge: VCH 

Publisher.

 

Reinhardt,  A.  (1957).  Twelve  rules  for a  new  academy.  In  Farrow,  C.  (Ed.),  Art  & 

Design: A. Reinhardt, J. Kosuth, F. Gonzalez-Torres. A symptoms of interference, conditions of 

possibility (p. 25-27). Cambridge: VCH Publisher.

 

Rolling, J.H. (2013). Arts-based research. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing. 

 

Sale,  T.  &  Betti,  C.  (2007).  Drawing.  A  contemporary  Approach.  United  States:

Thomson Wadsworth.

 

Saorsa,  J.  (2009).  Drawing  on  conversation.  Drawing  as  method  of  exploring  and 

interpreting ordinary verbal interaction: An investigation through contemporary practice. Berlin: 

VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.

 

Schwabsky,   B.   (2005).   Roland   Flexner.   In   Dexter,   E.   (Ed),   Vitamin   D.   New 

perspectives in drawing (p. 108-109). New York, NY: Phaidon.

 

Scrivener,  S.  (2002).  In  The  Art  Object  Does  Not  Embody  a  Form  of  Knowledge.

Retrieved October 31, 2017 from http://www.herts.ac.uk/ 

artdes1/research/papers/wpades/vol2/scrivenerfull.html

 

Sholis, B. (2005). Jim Hodges. In Grosenick, U. (Ed), Art now. Vol 2 (p. 208-211).

Cologne, Germany; Taschen.

 

Slager, H. (2009). Art and Method. In Elkins, J. (Ed.), Artist with PhDs. On the new Doctoral  

Degree  in  Studio  Art.  (p.  49-56).  Washington,  DC:  New  Academia Publishing.

 

Smith, H. (2003). Scientism: The bedrock of the Modern worldview. In Mehrdad M. Z. (Ed.),  Science  

and  the  myth  of  progress  (p.  233-248).  Bloomington:  World Wisdom Inc.

 

Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

 

Sugiharto, B. (2015). Wot batu. The bridge of the soul.  Wot batu. Sunaryo’s stones bridge.  A  

passage  through  wood,  water,  wind  and  soul,  20-25.  Jakarta:  Imaji media pustaka.

 

Sullivan, G. (2010). Art practice as research. Inquiry in visual arts. California, USA:

Sage Publications, Inc.

 

Thayer,  Peggy.  (2003).  The  experience  of  being  creative  as  a  spiritual  practice.  A 

Hermeneutic-phenomenological  study  (Revisioning  philosophy).  USA:  Peter Lang International 

Academic Publishers.

 

The     basics     of     philosophy.     (n.d.).     Retrieved     October     16,     2015     

from http://www.philosophybasics.com/branch_phenomenology.html

 

The   exquisite   process   of   Jeff   Koons.   (2015,   July  21).   In   Christie’s.   The   art 

people.Retrieved                November                19,                2015                from 

http://www.christies.com/features/Jeff-Koons-in-Bilbao-6348-1.aspx

 

The first quality German pencil. (n.d.). In Faber-Castle’s History of Pencil. Retrieved December    

                           15,                               2015                               

from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad

=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiQ47zTxLPJAhVBT44KHfjEC0AQFggpMAI&u 

rl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.faber-castell.sg%2F~%2Fmedia%2FFaber- 

Castell%2Fbrochures%2Fen%2FPress%2FA%2520-brief-history-of-the- 

pencil.ashx&usg=AFQjCNHt23H8CIwlO9GJPC732GVfUBrzTQ&sig2=h_- 

JhvVz565WuV9YcQdhCw&bvm=bv.108194040,d.c2E

 

The Monthly Video. (2013, May 2). Key Thinkers: Barbara Bolt on Martin Heidegger.

[Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3RV2tcNy1c

 

The manufacturing process: Processing the graphite. (n.d.). In How Products Are Made. Retrieved    

November    18,    2015    from http://www.madehow.com/Volume- 1/Pencil.html

 

Thompson, C. (2006, 31 July).  Art practice as research: A review essay. International Journal of 

Education & the Arts, 7, 1-12. http://www.ijea.org/v7r3/v7r3.pdf

 

Toynton, E (2012). Jackson Pollock. United States: Yale University Press.

 

Van  Manen,  M.  (2014).  Phenomenology  of  practice.  Meaning-giving  methods  in 

phenomenological research and writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

 

Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. 

Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

 

Wagner, H. (2005). House of mud. In Lange-Berndt, P. (Ed.), Materiality (p. 79-82).

Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.

 

Wentworth,  N.  (2004).  The  phenomenology  of  painting.  Cambridge:  Cambridge University press.

 

Wignesan,  T.  (2008).  Poietics:  Disquisitions  on  the  art  of  creation.  Allahabad: 

Cyberwit.net

 

Whicher,  R.M.  (1997).  Drawing  from  observation:  A  phenomenological  inquiry

(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,

Canada.

 

Whitehead, D. H. (2003). Poiesis and art-making: A Way of Letting-Be. Contemporary

Aesthetics     Journal.     vol.     1.     Retrieved     November     18,     2015     from 

https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/ca/7523862.0001.005/--poiesis-and-art-making-a- 

way-of-letting-be?rgn=main;view=fulltext

 

Young,  J.  (2001).  Heidegger’s  philosophy  of   art.   New  York,  NY:   Cambridge University 

press.

 

Young,  S.  (n.d.).  Pencil:  Grading  of  Pencil.  Retrieved  December  18,  2015  from 

http://www.unm.edu/~odette86/219/SunYoung_2_Definition_pdf.pdf

 

van Manen, Michele & van Manen, Max. (2014). Phenomenology. Encyclopedia of Educational Theory and 

Philosophy, 610-616. Retrieved October 31, 2017 from http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483346229.n253

 

Vergine, L (1996). Art on the Cutting Edge. Milano: Skira.

 

_(2015). William Anastasi: Reinventing drawing. In Van Cauteren, P. & Germann, M.

(Eds.), Drawing. The bottom line (p.148-151). Brussels: Mercatfonds.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.