Delphi technique: the future of vocational learning skills

Irdayanti Mat Nashir

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	T Technology (General)
Main Author :	Irdayanti Mat Nashir
Additional Authors :	Ramlee Mustapha Mohamed Nor Azhari Azman Siti Hafsyah Idris Dwi Esti Andriani Muhammad Ridzuan Idris Nurul Nazirah Mohd Imam Ma'arof
Title :	Delphi technique: the future of vocational learning skills

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Teknikal dan Vokasional
Year of Publication :	2020
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :	Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

This article explains the development of checklist which is related with future of vocational learning skills by using the Delphi techniques. The Delphi technique provides the opportunity for researchers to gather input from participants without requiring them to work face-to-face. Often, the process is used to find consensus among experts who have different views and perspectives. The Delphi technique enables group problem-solving using an iterative process of problem definition, discussion, feedback, and revisions. This paper will discuss the basics of the Delphi techniques, its application potential, the selection of expert panels and the means on how consensus can be reached among the participants using examples of our past research using the technique. This article also provides Rasch analysis to find reliability in checklist. The value of realibility must achieve 0.71 – 0.99 in good fit. The 11 out of 13 domain of the future learning skills have found in this research.

References

Azman, H. (2011). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Item Penilaian Pembimbing dalam Penbelajaran Berasaskan Kerja (PBK) menggunakan Model Pengukuran Rasch. USM, Psychometrics Centre, MIMOS & Malaysian Examination Syndicate, MOE.

Bond, T. G., Fox, & Christine, M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Third Edition.

Crittenden, V., Robert, A., & Peterson, R. A. (2019). Digital Disruption: The Transdisciplinary Future of Marketing Education. Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 41(1) 3 –4

Coon, D., John, O. M., & Martini, T. (2018). Psychology Modules for Active Learning. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Cyert, M. (2017). Developing a New Introductory Biology Curriculum. Accessed November 2, 2017. https://vptl.stanford.edu/spotlight/developingnew-introductory-biology-curriculum

Dommett, E. J. (2018). Learner ownership of technology-enhanced learning. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2017-0042

Frieman, J. S. R. (2016). Learning:A Behavioral, Cognitive and Evolutionary Synthesis. (Reid Hester, Ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Grewal, D., Motyka, S., & Levy, M. (2018). The Evolution and Future of Retailing and Retailing Education. Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 40(1) 85 –93.

Haron, M. A., Hussain, M. A. M., Zulkifli, R. M., Nashir, I. M., & Ma'arof, N. N. I. (2019). EMPLOYABILITY SKILLS NEEDED BY VOCATIONAL COLLEGE GRADUATES: FEEDBACK FROM THE INDUSTRY. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(4).

Linacre, J. M. (2015). Winsteps Rasch Measurement Computer Program User’s Guide. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.com.

Mustapha, R., Nashir, I. M., bin Azman, M. N. A., & Hasnan, K. A. (2020). Assessing the Implementation of the Project-Based Learning (PJBL) in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at a Malaysian Polytechnic. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 12(1).

Nashir, I. M., Mustapha, R., & Yusoff, A. (2015). Delphi technique: Enhancing research in technical and vocational education. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 7(2).

Nashir, I. M., Mustapha, R., & Yusoff, A. (2019). Rasch Model Validity for Robotics Learning Survey in Technical and Vocational Education System. HONAI, 2(1), 47-58.

Nashir, I. M., Mustapha, R., Maarof, N. N. M. I., & Rui, T. J. (2020). Modified Delphi Technique: The Development of Measurement Model for Innovative Instructional Leadership in Technical and Vocational Education Systems. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 12(1).

Nind, M., & Alicia Curtin, K. H. (2016). Research Methods for Pedagogy. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury.

Peters, M. (2017). "Technological Unemployment: Educating for the Fourth Industrial Revolution." Journal of Self-Governance and Managment Economics 5 (1): 25-33.

Piekkola, B. (2017). Conceptual and Historical Issues in Psychology. (Luke Block, Ed.). London: Sage Publications.

Shahabuddin,H., Rohizani,Y., & M. Z. A. (2009). Pedagogi: Strategi dan Teknik Mengajar dengan Berkesan. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Publications & Distributors Sdn.Bhd.

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Model Rasch Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Cimahi: Trimkomunikata.

Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (July 2015). "The scientific status of learning styles theories". Teaching of Psychology. 42 (3): 266–271. doi:10.1177/0098628315589505.

World Economic Forum (2017). Accelerating Workforce Reskilling for the Fourth Industrial Revolution an Agenda for Leaders to Shape the Future of Education, Gender and Work. White paper, Geneva: World Economic.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page