Design and Technology Teacher in TVET: A View on Thinking Style and Inventive Problem-Solving Skill

Tze, Kiong Tee

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	T Technology (General)
Main Author :	Tze, Kiong Tee
Additional Authors :	Shanty Saien Fahmi Rizal Sukardi Risfendra
Title :	Design and Technology Teacher in TVET: A View on Thinking Style and Inventive Problem-Solving Skill

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Teknikal dan Vokasional
Year of Publication :	2020
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :	Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Teachers play an important role to help student in solving problem in school and consequently preparing for their future career. Teachers can be the most important feature to expose thinking style in class. This is theimplication of Technical and Vocational Education and Training programme which requires the students to be ableto think creatively and critically in problem-solving. As inventive problem solving is known to be creativeassessment methods for innovation, it is needed to guide Design and Technology teachers to expose the studentnew technique of solving a problem. This study attempts to investigate teachers’ perception of their thinking style and inventive problem-solving skill. The importance of thinking styles in inventive problem-solving skill and the factors contributing to the achievement to inventive problem solving are also discussed. Data were collected from367 Design and Technology teachers across Malaysia. Data obtained were analyzed descriptively. This studyconfirmed that teachers know the role of thinking style in solving a problem. They also admit that inventiveproblem-solving skill is important but half of them still having problem to master the skills. Problem identificationis claimed to be a vital process in solving a problem but yet, majority of them still facing problem in finding theroot cause. As a counter-measures on this miss-alignment, modules are needed by teachers to help them integratingtheir thinking styles into teaching and learning in class. Module also acts as teaching aids for teachers in guidingthem solving inventive problems.

References

Abdul Latif, A. M. (2014). Pembangunan Kemahiran Penyelesaian Masalah Berlandaskan Projek Origami. Tesis PhD. UTHM.

Berdonosov, V. (2015). Concept of The TRIZ Evolutionary Approach in Education. Procedia Engineering, 131, 721–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.362

Boer, A.-L. de. (2014). Thinking Styles and Their role in Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252400208%0AThinking

Buzuku, S., & Shnai, I. (2018). A systematic literature review of TRIZ used in Eco-Design A systematic literature review of TRIZ used in Eco-Design. Journal of the European TRIZ Association 02-2017 (04) 1, 04(January).

Cavallucci, D., Cascini, G., Duflou, J., Livotov, P., & Vaneker, T. (2015). TRIZ and knowledge-based innovation in science and industry. Procedia Engineering, 131, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.341

Chew, F. P., & Nadaraja, S. (2014). Pelaksanaan Kemahiran Berfikir Kreatif Dan Kritis Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Komsas Di Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu-JPBM (Malay Language Education Journal – MyLEJ), 4(2), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/1306813.1306843

Domenech-betoret, F., & Gómez-artiga, A. (2014). The Relationship Among Students ’ and Teachers ’ Thinking Styles, Psychological Needs and Motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.002

Foshay, R., & Kirkley, J. (2003). Principles for Teaching Problem Solving. PLATO Learning, Inc., 2003.

Hsiang-tang, C., & Jahau, C. L. (2003). Eco-Innovative Examples for 40 TRIZ Inventive Principles. Triz-Journal, 1– 16. Retrieved from http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2003/06/a/01.pdf%0A5

Idris, R., Ariffin, S. R., & Ishak, N. M. (2009). Pengaruh Kemahiran Generik dalam Kemahiran Pemikiran Kritikal,Penyelesaian Masalah dan Komunikasi Pelajar Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). Malaysian Journal ofLearning and Instruction (MJLI), 6, 103–140. Retrieved from http://mjli.uum.edu.my/index.php/previous-issues/128-malaysian-journal-of-learning-and-instruction-mjli-vol-6-2009

Ismail, A., & Abiddin, N. Z. (2014). Issues and Challenges of Technical and Vocational Education and Training inMalaysia Towards Human Capital Development. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 19(January 2014), 7–11

Ismail, S. (2012). Kesediaan Guru Terhadap Pelaksanaan Mata Pelajaran Reka Bentuk Dan Teknologi (RBT) Sekolah Rendah Di Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana. UTHM. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 607–610.

Labuda, I. (2015). Possibilities of Applying TRIZ Methodology Elements (The 40 Inventive Principles) in The Process of Architectural Design. Procedia Engineering, 131, 476–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.443

Nulty, D. D. (2008). The Adequacy of Response Rates to Online and Paper Surveys: What Can Be Done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231

Omar, A. (2015). The Effects of Inventive Thinking Programme on Bahasa Melayu Students’ Inventive Thinking Ability and Dispositions. Journal of Management Research, 7(December). https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v7i2.6923

Osterman, M. D. (2015). Exploring Relationships Between Thinking Style and Sex, Age, Academic Major, Occupation and Levels of Arts Engagement Among Professionals Working in Museums. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University, Florida International University. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/2277

Rasul, M. S., Hilmi, Z., Ashari, M., Azman, N., Amnah, R., & Rauf, A. (2015). Transforming TVET in Malaysia?:Harmonizing the Governance Structure in a Multiple Stakeholder Setting. TVET-Online.Asia, (4), 1–13.

Roy, J. (2012). Elementary Teachers ’ Perceptions of Their Teaching Practices to Foster Creative Thinking in Their Students. Curriculum and Instruction Undergraduate Honors Theses. 1. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.uark.edu/cieduht Recommended

Tee, T. K., Saien, S., Yee, M. H., & Mohamad, M. M. (2017). TRIZ?: An Alternate Way to Solve Problem for Student. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2658

Temel, S. (2014). The Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Pre-Service Teachers ’ Critical Thinking Dispositions and Perceptions of Problem-Solving Ability. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1–20.

Toivonen, T. (2015). Continuous innovation - Combining Toyota Kata and TRIZ for sustained innovation. Procedia Engineering, 131, 963–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.408

Wan Mohamed, W. A., & Omar, B. (2010). Through Work-Based Learning Among Community College. Journal of Technical Education and Training (JTET), 2(1), 1–8.

Wang, R., & Zhang, J. (2017). A Study on the Application of TRIZ in Innovative Design of Electronic Products. Revista de La Facultad de Ingeniería U.C.V., 32(15), 578–582.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page