UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun
terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi murid dalam tajuk algoritma bagi mata pelajaran Asas Sains
Komputer (ASK). Pendekatan kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen digunakan
dalam kajian ini. Kajian dijalankan secara persampelan bertujuan melibatkan 59 murid
tingkatan satu yang mengambil mata pelajaran ASK di sebuah sekolah di daerah Kuantan. Sampel
terdiri daripada 29 murid untuk kumpulan rawatan dan 30 murid untuk kumpulan kawalan. Dua jenis
instrumen kajian digunakan iaitu soalan peperiksaan akhir tahun 2018 dan borang soal
selidik motivasi. Data dianalisis menggunakan Statistical Package For The Social Science
(SPSS) bagi mendapatkan data deskriptif iaitu nilai min, peratus dan sisihan piawai
manakala statistik inferens seperti ujian t dan korelasi Pearson digunakan untuk melihat
hubungan antara faktor yang dikaji. Hasil kajian menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan min yang signifikan
antara pencapaian ujian kumpulan rawatan (Min = 51.90, S.P = 11.99) berbanding pencapaian ujian
kumpulan kawalan (Min = -19.17, S.P = 10.41), [t (28) =
-23.31, ρ< 0.05]. Begitu juga dengan motivasi kumpulan rawatan (Min = 90.82, S.P = 6.27)
menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan min yang signifikan berbanding dengan kumpulan kawalan (Min =
63.4, S.P = 8.01), [t (57) = -14.44, ρ |
References |
Abdullah, M. F. N. L., & Wei, L. T. (2017). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen penilaian kendiri pembelajaran geometri tingkatan satu. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 211–265.
Abid Azhar, K., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Google Classroom: Teachers’ Perceptions. Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 52–66.
Ahn, M. (2017). Student Perception of Language Achievement and Learner Autonomy in a Blended Korean Language Course: The Case Study of Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center. ProQuest LLC.
Alhazbi, S. (2015). Active Blended Learning to Improve Students’ Motivation in Computer Programming Courses: A Case Study. Advances in Engineering Education in the Middle East and North Africa: Current Status, and Future Insights, 187–204.
Ali, A. &, & Zulkifli, Z. (2016). Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan (2016) 7: 57–72. Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan, 7, 73–88.
Ali, A. J., Abdullah, A. G. K., & Mohamed, I. (2019). Amalan Pengupayaan dan Autonomi Guru dalam Pembelajaran dan Pemudahcaraan Abad ke-21. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 6(1), 49–58.
Arabie, C. P. (2016). Educational Technology Tools in Learning Management Systems Influence on Online Student Course Satisfaction in Higher Education A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Louisiana Lafayette In Partial Fulfillment of the Require.
Asbulah, L. H., Lubis, M. A., Aladdin, A., & Sahrim, M. (2018). (The level of holistic, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation towards arabic language vocabulary among graduate students in public universities). Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 33, 75–93.
Asmawati Mohamad Alia, Norizal Abdul Karim@SAB, Anita Mohamed, N. I. (2018). Teaching Style and Active Learning Application in Dynamic Skills Subject for Realization 21 st Century Learning, 2, 47–55.
Baaqeel, H. (2015). Central Limit Theorems and Statistical Inference for some Random Graph Models. University of Nottingham.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Asas Sains Komputer Tingkatan 1.
Bahagian Pendidikan Guru. (2016). 1.0 Konsep Asas Pemikiran Komputasional, 1–6.
Baker, C. (2017). Quantitative research designs: Experimental, quasi-experimental, and descriptive. In Jones & Bartlett Learning (pp. 155–183).
Bati, T. B. (2015). Blended learning in large class introductory programming courses : an empirical study in the context of an Ethiopian university.
Blaschke, L. M. (2015). The Pedagogy – Andragogy – Heutagogy Continuum and Technology-Supported. Springer Singapore.
Blaschke, L. M., Hase, S., & Associates, A. (2019). Heutagogy and digital media networks: Setting students on the path to lifelong learning. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 1.
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Carnegie Mellon University. (2018). Center for Computational Thinking.
Clark, M. H., Middleton, S. C., Nguyen, D., & Zwick, L. K. (2014). Mediating relationships between academic motivation, academic integration and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 30–38.
Culbertson, P. A. (2018). High School Blended Learning Courses : Teacher Beliefs , Perceptions Of Experiences , And Recommendations by Submitted to the University at Albany , State University of New York in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philos.
Fallis, A. . (2013). Essential Algorithms: A Practical Approach to Computer Algorithms. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53).
Fronza, I., Ioini, N. E. L., & Corral, L. (2017). Engineering Methods : A Framework for Middle Schools, 17(4), 1–28.
Garcia-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). What Computational Thinking Is. Journal of Information Technology Research, 9(3), 5–8.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.
Gerber, M., Grund, S., & Grote, G. (2008). Distributed collaboration activities in a blended learning scenario and the effects on learning performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 232–244.
Goh, C. F., Leong, C. M., Kasmin, K., Hii, P. K., & Tan, O. K. (2017). Students’ experiences, learning outcomes and satisfaction in e-learning. Journal of E- Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(2), 117–128.
Hee Jee Mei & Siti Liyana Binti Mohamad Yusuff. (2011). Hubungan Antara Tahap Motivasi Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Pendidikan Jarak Jauh Universiti Sains Malaysia, 1–20.
Huang, C.-L., Yang, S. C., & Chen, A.-S. (2015). Motivations and Gratification in an Online Game: Relationships Among Players’ Self-Esteem, Self-Concept, and Interpersonal Relationships. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(2), 193–203.
István Gerják. (2017). I Mage Processing Algorithms In The Secondary, 10(3).
Joy, R., & Ventayen, M. (2018). Usability Evaluation of Google Classroom: Basis for the Adaptation of GSuite E-Learning Platform Software Management View project Data Analysis View project, (December 2017).
Juppri Bacotang. (2014). Pasti Tahap Kemahiran Literasi Awal Kanak-Kanak. International Language Conference, (February).
Kaur, M. (2013). Blended Learning - Its Challenges and Future. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 612–617.
Kharb, P., & Samanta, P. P. (2016). Blended learning approach for teaching and learning anatomy: Students’ and teachers’ perspective. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India, 65(1), 43–47.
Knuth, D. E. (1981). Algorithms in Modern M a t h e m a t i c s and Computer Science. Knuth, D. E. (1997). The_Art_of_Computer_Programming - Vol 1.pdf.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.
Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu, C. (2017). A Pedagogical Framework for Computational Thinking. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 154–171.
Kurniawati, R. (2014). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran Keterampilan. Universitas Negeri Semarang Indonesia.
Lockwood, J., & Mooney, A. (2017). Computational Thinking in Education: Where does it Fit? A systematic literary review, 1–57.
Magelinskait?, Š., Kepalait?, A., & Legkauskas, V. (2014). Relationship between Social Competence, Learning Motivation, and School Anxiety in Primary School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2936–2940.
Maizatul Hayati Mohamad Yatim & Ummu Husna Azizan.(2018). Pembelajaran Teradun : Trend,Isu dan Amalan. Tanjung Malim, Perak:Penerbit UPSI
Mariam, M., Wibawanto, H., & Supraptono, E. (2018). Development of Learning Method Blended Flipped Classroom of in Algorithm and Programming. Journal of Vocational and Career Education, 3(2), 168–177.
Mathews, K. M. (2016). Transformative Models in K-12 Education: The Impact of a Blended Universal Design for Learning Intervention. An Experimental Mixed Methods Study. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (May), 137.
McLaren, B. M., Deleeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). A politeness effect in learning with web-based intelligent tutors. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 69(1–2), 70–79.
Meehan, T. (2016). A Quantitative Quasi-Experimental Study of an Online High School Mathematics Remediation Program.
Mirriahi, N., Alonzo, D., & Fox, B. (2015). A blended learning framework for curriculum design and professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 23(1063519).
Mit, F., Senin, A., & Nasri, N. M. (2017). PERSEPSI GURU NOVIS TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN FROG VLE BERBANTUKAN FROG APPLIANCE DALAM PDPC, 288–299.
Mohd. Hamzah, M. I., & Attan, N. (2013). Tahap Kesediaan Guru Sains Dalam Penggunaan Teknologi Maklumat Berasaskan Komputer Dalam Proses Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Teknologi, 46(1), 45–60.
Mohd Azli, Y., Wong, K. T., Noraini, D., & Noh, M. (2016). Pembelajaran Teradun: Satu tinjauan literatur terhadap faktor- faktor penerimaan guru melalui model- model penerimaan. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 6(1), 67–85.
Morrissey, B. (2017). Blended learning and motivation; An examination of Student Perceptions.
Muhamad Azhar, S., Mohamad, I., & Amri, Y. (2016). Kolaborasi dalam Pendidikan Vokasional: Mewujudkan Pembelajaran Blended Learning melalui Teknologi Web 2.0. International Conference on ICT Education 2016 (ICICT @ Edu 2016), 16–29.
Muhamad Aizat, & Siti Huzaifah Mohammad. (2017). Hubungan antara Motivasi Kendiri dengan Pencapaian Matematik Pelajar Tingkatan 5 di Daerah Rompin. E- Proceedings National Innovation and Invention Competition Through Exhibition (ICompEx’18).
Nithia, K., Yusop, F., & Razak, R. (2015). Mobile learning for teaching and learning Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM): A review of literature. Economics, Social Sciences and Information Management, (November), 173–176.
Noor Ashikin Ibrahim, & Kamisah Osman. (2017). Kesan Frog VLE secara Pembelajaran Koperatif terhadap pencapaian, KBAT dan minat pelajar bagi subjek Kimia. Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan Transdisiplin (STeT 2017), 635– 649.
Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2015 - 2025. Education.
Privitera, G. J., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2018). Quasi-Experimental and Single-Case Experimental Designs. In Research Methods for Education (pp. 333–370).
Ramakrisnan, P., Yahya, Y. B., Hasrol, M. N. H., & Aziz, A. A. (2012). Blended Learning: A Suitable Framework For E-Learning In Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 513–526.
Reynolds, R., & Leeder, C. (2017). Information Uses and Learning Outcomes During Guided Discovery in a Blended E-Learning Game Design Program for Secondary Computer Science Education. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2017), 2076–2085.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
Schmidt, J. (2007). Preparing Students for Success in Blended Learning Environments : Future Oriented Motivation & Self-Regulation. Educational Research, 1–302.
Schober, A., & Keller, L. (2012). Impact factors for learner motivation in blended learning environments. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 7(SPEC. ISSUE 2), 37–41.
Selby, C. C. (2014). How Can the Teaching of Programming Be Used to Enhance Computational Thinking Skills? UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON. Retrieved from https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/366256/1/ soton.ac.uk_ude_personalfiles_users_al4_ mydesktop_Selby_cc_New_Amendments.pdf
Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M. (2016). The Application of Google Classroom as a Tool for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 8(10), 8–11.
Siti Khadijah Mohd Arrif.(2016).The Effects of Blended Learning In The Teaching of English Through Short Story Among Secondary School Students. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Siyamta, Setyosari, P., Kamdi, W., & Ulfa, S. (2000). Teori Connectivism Dalam Pembelajaran Sebagai Pendukung Sistem Adaptive E-Learning and Big Data Personalized Learning. InovasI PendIdIkan DI ERa BIg Data Dan AsPek PsIkoLogInYa ||, 417–424.
Solitro, U., Pasini, M., Gradi, D. De, & Brondino, M. (2017). Informatics in Schools: Focus on Learning Programming, 10696, 169–179.
Su, J. M., & Wang, S. J. (2017). A Web-Based learning activity integrated with scratch tool to support programming learning. Ubi-Media 2017 - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing and Workshops with the 4th International Workshop on Advanced E-Learning and the 1st International Workshop on Multimedia and IoT: Networks, Systems and Applications, 1–4.
Tengku Sarina Aini, T. K., Fatimah Sahida, A., Yusmini, M. Y., & Madiha, B. (2017). Pendekatan Konstruktivisme di Malaysia dan Brunei Darussalam: Satu Tinjauan Awal Terhadap Pengalaman Guru Pendidikan Islam. Journal of Islamic Educational Research, 2(1), 23–35.
Tosun, S. (2015). The Effects of Blended Learning on EFL Students’ Vocabulary Enhancement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 641–647.
Van Niekerk, J., & Webb, P. (2016). The effectiveness of brain-compatible blended learning material in the teaching of programming logic. Computers and Education, 103, 16–27.
Vanslambrouck, S., Zhu, C., Lombaerts, K., Philipsen, B., & Tondeur, J. (2018). Students’ motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 36, 33–40.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333.
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725.
Xinogalos, S. (2016). Designing and deploying programming courses: Strategies, tools, difficulties and pedagogy. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 559– 588.
Yagci, M. (2016). Blended Learning Experience in a Programming Language Course and the Effect of the Thinking Styles of the Students on Success and Motivation. TOJET : The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(4), 32–45.
Zepcevski, J. (2012). Complexity & Verification: The History Of Programming As Problem Solving. Social Sciences.
Zhang, X., Huang, X., Wang, F., & Cao, X. (2018). Research on MOOC-based Blended Learning of Programming Language Course. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science, (ichae), 586–591.
Zhao, D., Chis, A., Muntean, G.-M., & Muntean, C. H. (2018). a Large-Scale Pilot Study on Game-Based Learning and Blended Learning Methodologies in Undergraduate Programming Courses. EDULEARN18 Proceedings, 1, 3716– 3724.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |