UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :QA76 Computer software
Main Author :Norraihan Rosman
Title :Keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi dalam mata pelajaran Asas Sains Komputer
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
Year of Publication :2020
Notes :pedagogi
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan keberkesanan pendekatan pembelajaran teradun terhadap pencapaian  dan  motivasi  murid  dalam  tajuk algoritma bagi  mata  pelajaran Asas  Sains   Komputer  (ASK).  Pendekatan  kuantitatif  dengan  reka  bentuk  kuasi eksperimen   digunakan    dalam   kajian   ini.   Kajian   dijalankan   secara   persampelan bertujuan melibatkan 59 murid  tingkatan satu yang mengambil mata pelajaran ASK di sebuah sekolah di daerah Kuantan. Sampel  terdiri daripada 29 murid untuk kumpulan rawatan dan 30 murid untuk kumpulan kawalan. Dua jenis  instrumen kajian digunakan iaitu  soalan  peperiksaan  akhir  tahun  2018  dan  borang  soal   selidik  motivasi.  Data dianalisis  menggunakan  Statistical  Package  For  The  Social  Science   (SPSS)  bagi mendapatkan  data  deskriptif  iaitu  nilai  min,  peratus  dan  sisihan  piawai   manakala statistik  inferens  seperti  ujian  t   dan  korelasi  Pearson  digunakan  untuk  melihat  hubungan antara faktor yang dikaji. Hasil kajian menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan min yang signifikan  antara pencapaian ujian kumpulan rawatan (Min = 51.90, S.P = 11.99) berbanding pencapaian ujian  kumpulan kawalan (Min = -19.17, S.P = 10.41), [t (28) = -23.31, ρ< 0.05]. Begitu juga dengan motivasi kumpulan rawatan (Min = 90.82, S.P = 6.27)   menunjukkan  terdapat  perbezaan  min  yang  signifikan  berbanding  dengan kumpulan kawalan (Min =  63.4, S.P = 8.01), [t (57) = -14.44, ρ

References

Abdullah, M. F. N. L., & Wei, L. T. (2017). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen

penilaian  kendiri  pembelajaran  geometri  tingkatan  satu.  Malaysian  Journal  of Learning and 

Instruction, 14(1), 211–265.

 

Abid  Azhar,  K., &  Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of  Google Classroom: Teachers’ Perceptions. 

Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 52–66.

 

Ahn, M. (2017). Student Perception of Language Achievement and Learner Autonomy in  a  Blended  

Korean  Language  Course: The  Case Study of  Defense  Language Institute Foreign Language Center. 

ProQuest LLC.

 

Alhazbi,  S.  (2015).  Active  Blended  Learning  to  Improve  Students’  Motivation  in Computer  

Programming  Courses:  A  Case  Study.   Advances  in  Engineering Education  in  the  Middle  East 

and  North  Africa:  Current  Status,  and  Future Insights, 187–204.

 

Ali, A. &, & Zulkifli, Z. (2016). Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan (2016) 7: 57–72. Jurnal

Pemikir Pendidikan, 7, 73–88.

 

Ali,  A.  J.,  Abdullah,  A.  G.  K.,  &  Mohamed,  I.  (2019).  Amalan  Pengupayaan  dan Autonomi  

Guru  dalam  Pembelajaran  dan  Pemudahcaraan  Abad  ke-21.  Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 6(1), 

49–58.

 

Arabie, C. P. (2016). Educational Technology Tools in Learning Management Systems Influence   on   

Online   Student   Course   Satisfaction   in   Higher   Education   A Dissertation  Presented  to  

the  Graduate  Faculty  of  the  University  of  Louisiana Lafayette In Partial Fulfillment of the 

Require.

 

Asbulah, L. H., Lubis, M. A., Aladdin, A., & Sahrim, M. (2018). (The level of holistic, intrinsic  

and  extrinsic  motivation  towards  arabic  language  vocabulary  among graduate students in 

public universities). Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 33, 75–93.

 

Asmawati Mohamad Alia, Norizal Abdul Karim@SAB, Anita Mohamed, N. I. (2018). Teaching Style and 

Active Learning Application in Dynamic Skills Subject for Realization 21 st Century Learning, 2, 

47–55.

 

Baaqeel, H. (2015). Central Limit Theorems and Statistical Inference for some Random Graph Models. 

University of Nottingham.

 

Bahagian   Pembangunan   Kurikulum   Kementerian   Pendidikan   Malaysia.   (2015). Dokumen 

Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Asas Sains Komputer Tingkatan 1.

 

Bahagian Pendidikan Guru. (2016). 1.0 Konsep Asas Pemikiran Komputasional, 1–6.

 

Baker, C. (2017). Quantitative research designs: Experimental, quasi-experimental, and

descriptive. In Jones & Bartlett Learning (pp. 155–183).

 

Bati, T. B. (2015). Blended learning in large class introductory programming courses : an empirical 

study in the context of an Ethiopian university.

 

Blaschke,  L.  M.  (2015).  The  Pedagogy  –  Andragogy  –  Heutagogy  Continuum  and 

Technology-Supported. Springer Singapore.

 

Blaschke,  L.  M.,  Hase,  S.,  &  Associates,  A.  (2019).  Heutagogy  and  digital  media 

networks: Setting  students  on  the  path  to  lifelong  learning.  Pacific  Journal  of 

Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 1.

 

Bonk,  C.  J.,  &  Graham,  C.  R.  (2012).  The  handbook  of  blended  learning:  Global 

perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

 

Carnegie Mellon University. (2018). Center for Computational Thinking.

 

Clark,  M.  H.,  Middleton,  S.  C.,  Nguyen,  D.,  &  Zwick,  L.  K.  (2014).  Mediating 

relationships between academic motivation, academic integration and academic performance. Learning 

and Individual Differences, 33, 30–38.

 

Culbertson, P. A. (2018). High School Blended Learning Courses : Teacher Beliefs , Perceptions  Of  

Experiences  ,  And  Recommendations  by  Submitted  to  the University at Albany , State 

University of New York in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of 

Philos.

 

Fallis,   A.   .   (2013).   Essential   Algorithms:   A   Practical   Approach   to   Computer 

Algorithms. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53).

 

Fronza, I., Ioini, N. E. L., & Corral, L. (2017). Engineering Methods : A Framework for Middle 

Schools, 17(4), 1–28.

 

Garcia-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). What Computational Thinking Is. Journal of Information Technology 

Research, 9(3), 5–8.

 

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in 

higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.

 

Gerber,  M.,  Grund,  S.,  &  Grote,  G.  (2008).  Distributed collaboration activities in a 

blended  learning  scenario  and  the  effects  on  learning  performance.  Journal  of Computer 

Assisted Learning, 24(3), 232–244.

 

Goh,  C.  F.,  Leong,  C.  M.,  Kasmin,  K.,  Hii,  P.  K.,  &  Tan,  O.  K.  (2017).  Students’ 

experiences,  learning  outcomes  and  satisfaction  in  e-learning.  Journal  of  E- Learning and 

Knowledge Society, 13(2), 117–128.

 

Hee Jee Mei & Siti Liyana Binti Mohamad Yusuff. (2011). Hubungan Antara Tahap

Motivasi Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Pendidikan Jarak Jauh Universiti

Sains Malaysia, 1–20.

 

Huang, C.-L., Yang, S. C., & Chen, A.-S. (2015). Motivations and Gratification in an Online  Game:  

Relationships  Among  Players’  Self-Esteem,  Self-Concept,  and Interpersonal  Relationships.  

Social  Behavior  and  Personality: An International Journal, 43(2), 193–203.

 

István Gerják. (2017). I Mage Processing Algorithms In The Secondary, 10(3).

 

Joy, R., & Ventayen, M. (2018). Usability Evaluation of Google Classroom: Basis for the  Adaptation 

 of  GSuite  E-Learning  Platform  Software  Management  View project Data Analysis View project, 

(December 2017).

 

Juppri   Bacotang.   (2014).   Pasti   Tahap   Kemahiran   Literasi   Awal   Kanak-Kanak.

International Language Conference, (February).

 

Kaur, M. (2013). Blended Learning - Its Challenges and Future. Procedia - Social and Behavioral 

Sciences, 93, 612–617.

 

Kharb,  P.,  &  Samanta,  P.  P.  (2016).  Blended  learning  approach  for  teaching  and learning 

anatomy: Students’ and teachers’ perspective. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India, 65(1), 

43–47.

 

Knuth, D. E. (1981). Algorithms in Modern M a t h e m a t i c s and Computer Science. Knuth, D. E. 

(1997). The_Art_of_Computer_Programming - Vol 1.pdf.

 

Koehler,  M.  J.,  Mishra,  P.,  & Cain,  W. (2013).  What  is Technological Pedagogical Content 

Knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.

 

Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu,

C.  (2017).  A  Pedagogical  Framework  for  Computational  Thinking.  Digital Experiences in 

Mathematics Education, 3(2), 154–171.

 

Kurniawati, R. (2014). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran 

Keterampilan. Universitas Negeri Semarang Indonesia.

 

Lockwood, J., & Mooney, A. (2017). Computational Thinking in Education: Where does it Fit? A 

systematic literary review, 1–57.

 

Magelinskait?,  Š.,  Kepalait?,  A.,  &  Legkauskas,  V.  (2014).  Relationship  between Social 

Competence, Learning Motivation, and School Anxiety in Primary School. Procedia - Social and 

Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2936–2940.

 

Maizatul  Hayati  Mohamad  Yatim  &  Ummu  Husna  Azizan.(2018).  Pembelajaran Teradun : Trend,Isu 

dan Amalan. Tanjung Malim, Perak:Penerbit UPSI

 

Mariam,  M.,  Wibawanto,  H.,  &  Supraptono,  E.  (2018).  Development  of  Learning

Method Blended Flipped Classroom of in Algorithm and Programming. Journal

of Vocational and Career Education, 3(2), 168–177.

 

Mathews, K. M. (2016). Transformative Models in K-12 Education: The Impact of a Blended  Universal  

Design  for  Learning  Intervention.  An  Experimental  Mixed Methods Study. ProQuest Dissertations 

and Theses, (May), 137.

 

McLaren, B. M., Deleeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). A politeness effect in learning with  

web-based  intelligent  tutors.  International  Journal  of  Human  Computer Studies, 69(1–2), 

70–79.

 

Meehan, T. (2016). A Quantitative Quasi-Experimental Study of an Online High School Mathematics 

Remediation Program.

 

Mirriahi,  N.,  Alonzo,  D.,  &  Fox,  B.  (2015).  A  blended  learning  framework  for curriculum 

  design   and   professional   development.   Research   in   Learning Technology, 23(1063519).

 

Mit, F., Senin, A., & Nasri, N. M. (2017). PERSEPSI GURU NOVIS TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN FROG VLE 

BERBANTUKAN FROG APPLIANCE DALAM PDPC, 288–299.

 

Mohd.  Hamzah,  M.  I.,  &  Attan,  N.  (2013).  Tahap  Kesediaan  Guru  Sains  Dalam Penggunaan    

Teknologi    Maklumat    Berasaskan    Komputer    Dalam    Proses Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran. 

Jurnal Teknologi, 46(1), 45–60.

 

Mohd Azli, Y., Wong, K. T., Noraini, D., & Noh, M. (2016). Pembelajaran Teradun: Satu  tinjauan  

literatur  terhadap  faktor-  faktor  penerimaan  guru  melalui  model- model penerimaan. Journal 

of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 6(1), 67–85.

 

Morrissey,  B.  (2017).  Blended  learning and  motivation; An  examination of  Student 

Perceptions.

 

Muhamad Azhar, S., Mohamad, I., & Amri, Y. (2016). Kolaborasi dalam Pendidikan Vokasional:  

Mewujudkan  Pembelajaran  Blended  Learning  melalui  Teknologi Web 2.0. International Conference 

on ICT Education 2016 (ICICT @ Edu 2016), 16–29.

 

Muhamad  Aizat,  &  Siti  Huzaifah  Mohammad.  (2017).  Hubungan  antara  Motivasi Kendiri dengan 

Pencapaian Matematik Pelajar Tingkatan 5 di Daerah Rompin. E- Proceedings National Innovation and 

Invention Competition Through Exhibition (ICompEx’18).

 

Nithia, K., Yusop, F., & Razak, R. (2015). Mobile learning for teaching and learning Science,  

Technology,  Engineering  and  Mathematics  (STEM):  A  review  of literature.    Economics,    

Social    Sciences    and    Information    Management,

(November), 173–176.

 

Noor   Ashikin   Ibrahim,   &   Kamisah   Osman.   (2017).   Kesan   Frog   VLE   secara

Pembelajaran  Koperatif  terhadap  pencapaian,  KBAT  dan  minat  pelajar  bagi subjek  Kimia.  

Prosiding  Seminar  Pendidikan  Transdisiplin  (STeT  2017),  635– 649.

 

Pelan  Pembangunan  Pendidikan  Malaysia.  (2013).  Pelan  Pembangunan  Pendidikan Malaysia 2015 - 

2025. Education.

 

Privitera, G. J., &  Ahlgrim-Delzell,  L.  (2018). Quasi-Experimental and Single-Case Experimental 

Designs. In Research Methods for Education (pp. 333–370).

 

Ramakrisnan,  P.,  Yahya,  Y.  B.,  Hasrol,  M.  N.  H.,  &  Aziz,  A.  A.  (2012).  Blended 

Learning: A Suitable Framework For E-Learning In Higher Education. Procedia

- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 513–526.

 

Reynolds, R., & Leeder, C. (2017). Information Uses and Learning Outcomes During Guided Discovery 

in a Blended E-Learning Game Design Program for Secondary Computer  Science  Education.  

Proceedings  of  the  50th  Hawaii  International Conference on System Sciences (2017), 2076–2085.

 

Ryan,  R.  M.,  &  Deci,  E.  L.  (2000).  Intrinsic  and  Extrinsic  Motivations:  Classic 

Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

 

Schmidt, J. (2007). Preparing Students for Success in Blended Learning Environments : Future 

Oriented Motivation & Self-Regulation. Educational Research, 1–302.

 

Schober,  A.,  &  Keller,  L.  (2012).  Impact  factors  for  learner  motivation  in  blended 

learning  environments.   International  Journal   of   Emerging   Technologies  in Learning, 

7(SPEC. ISSUE 2), 37–41.

 

Selby, C. C. (2014). How Can the Teaching of Programming Be Used to Enhance Computational Thinking 

Skills? UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON.

Retrieved from

https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/366256/1/    soton.ac.uk_ude_personalfiles_users_al4_ 

mydesktop_Selby_cc_New_Amendments.pdf

 

Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M. (2016). The Application of Google Classroom 

as a Tool for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer 

Engineering, 8(10), 8–11.

 

Siti Khadijah Mohd Arrif.(2016).The Effects of Blended Learning In The Teaching of English  Through 

 Short  Story  Among  Secondary  School  Students.  Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Siyamta,  Setyosari,  P.,  Kamdi,  W.,  &  Ulfa,  S.  (2000).  Teori  Connectivism  Dalam 

Pembelajaran  Sebagai  Pendukung  Sistem  Adaptive  E-Learning  and  Big  Data

Personalized   Learning.   InovasI  PendIdIkan  DI  ERa  BIg  Data   Dan  AsPek

PsIkoLogInYa ||, 417–424.

 

Solitro, U., Pasini, M., Gradi, D. De, & Brondino, M. (2017). Informatics in Schools:

Focus on Learning Programming, 10696, 169–179.

 

Su, J. M., & Wang, S. J. (2017). A Web-Based learning activity integrated with scratch tool to 

support programming learning. Ubi-Media 2017 - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on 

Ubi-Media Computing and Workshops with the 4th International  Workshop  on  Advanced  E-Learning  

and  the  1st  International Workshop on Multimedia and IoT: Networks, Systems and Applications, 

1–4.

 

Tengku Sarina Aini, T. K., Fatimah Sahida, A., Yusmini, M. Y., & Madiha, B. (2017). Pendekatan 

Konstruktivisme di Malaysia dan Brunei Darussalam: Satu Tinjauan Awal   Terhadap   Pengalaman   

Guru   Pendidikan   Islam.   Journal   of   Islamic Educational Research, 2(1), 23–35.

 

Tosun,  S.  (2015).  The  Effects  of  Blended  Learning  on  EFL  Students’  Vocabulary 

Enhancement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 641–647.

 

Van Niekerk, J., & Webb, P. (2016). The effectiveness of brain-compatible blended learning material 

in the teaching of programming logic. Computers and Education, 103, 16–27.

 

Vanslambrouck,  S.,  Zhu,  C.,  Lombaerts,  K.,  Philipsen,  B.,  &  Tondeur,  J.  (2018). 

Students’  motivation  and  subjective  task  value  of  participating  in  online  and blended 

learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 36, 33–40.

 

White,   R.   W.   (1959).   Motivation   reconsidered:   The   concept   of   competence.

Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333.

 

Wing,   J.   M.   (2008).   Computational   thinking   and   thinking   about   computing. 

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 

366(1881), 3717–3725.

 

Xinogalos, S. (2016). Designing and deploying programming courses: Strategies, tools, difficulties 

and pedagogy. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 559– 588.

 

Yagci, M. (2016). Blended Learning Experience in a Programming Language Course and the Effect of 

the Thinking Styles of the Students on Success and Motivation. TOJET : The Turkish Online Journal 

of Educational Technology, 15(4), 32–45.

 

Zepcevski,  J.  (2012).  Complexity  &  Verification:  The  History  Of  Programming  As Problem 

Solving. Social Sciences.

 

Zhang, X., Huang, X., Wang, F., & Cao, X. (2018). Research on MOOC-based Blended Learning  of  

Programming  Language  Course.  DEStech  Transactions  on  Social

Science, Education and Human Science, (ichae), 586–591.

 

Zhao, D., Chis, A.,  Muntean, G.-M., & Muntean, C. H. (2018). a  Large-Scale Pilot

Study   on   Game-Based   Learning   and   Blended   Learning   Methodologies   in

Undergraduate  Programming  Courses.  EDULEARN18  Proceedings,  1,  3716–

3724.

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.