Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G., & deBot, K. (2006). Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in
the Netherlands: Students’ language proficiency in English. Educational Research and
Evaluation, 12(1), 75-93.
Antaranews. (2013). Sekolah-sekolah berbasis kurikulum Cambridge di Indonesia. Retrived from
https://www.antaranews/kurikulum-cambridge/Indonesia.com. on December 2013.
Ariyani, Z.D., Bambang S., & Siti N. A. (2013). The Investigation of challenges in teaching and
learning mathematics through English at secondary schools inKepulauan Riau, Indonesia.
International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education, 277-283.
Arsyad, A. (2011). Media pembelajaran.Jakarta: PT Raja GrafindoPersada.
Artini, D. S. (2013). Penerapan pendekatan contextual teaching and learning untuk meningkatkan
pemahaman materi konsep gerak benda dalam mata pelajaran sains pada siswa tunarungu kelas III.
Master Thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Bandung.
Astika, G., & Anton, W. (2012). Studi kasus pembelajaran MIPA bilingual di tiga SMA
RSBI di Jawa Tengah. Litera Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 11(2),
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2015). Sumatera Selatan dalam angka tahun 2015.
Sumatera Selatan: BPS Provinsi Sumatera Selatan.
Bailey, C. A. (2007). A guide to qualitative field research. Second edition. California: Pine Forge
Press.
Baker, C. (1993). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters.
Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5??ed.).
Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Baker, C., & Prys Jones, S. (1998). Encyclopedia of bilingualism and bilingual
education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Banegas, D.L. (2011). Content and language integrated learning in Argentina 2008– 2011. Latin
American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 4(2), 33–50.
Bruner, J. (1985). Vigotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In
WangYuanying (Ed), Studies in Literature and Language (pp. 46-48). China:
gdao University.
Burns, N. & Grove, S.K. (2005). The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, critique, and
utilization (5th Ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders
Bogdan, R. C., & Taylor, S. J. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research method.
New York: John Willey and Sons.
British Council. (2007). Teaching English. Retrived from http://www.teachingenglish. org.uk.
Brown,D.(2000).Teaching by principles: An i n t e r a t i v e approach to language
pedagogy. 2nd ed. White Plains, NewYork: Longman.
Cambridge Assessment International Education. (2017). Bilingual learners and
bilingual education. Retrieved from www.cambridgeinternational.org/images/
271190-bilingual-learners-and-bilingual-education.pdf .
Casal, S. (2008). Cooperative learning in CLIL contexts: Ways to improve students’ competences in
the foreign language classroom. Paper presented at IAIE Conference: Cooperative
learning in multicultural societies: Critical reflections ,Turin, Italy.
Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive language
learning approach. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Chan, R. L. (2007). Context and impact of medium of instruction on attitudes,
motivation and academic performance: Secondary school children in Hong Kong. Doctoral
thesis, University of Durham, School of Education. Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.ud/2851.
Chong, Hin. L. (2007). Penyelidikan pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif.
Malaysia: McGraw Hill Education.
Çimer A (2004). A study of Turkish biology teachers’ and students’ views of effective teaching in
schools and teacher education. EdD Dissertation, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, U.K.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of references for languages:
Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education.
London: Routledge-Falmer
Cole, J., & Gonya, R. (2010). Accuracy of Self-reported SAT and ACT Test Scores: Implication for
Research. Research in Higher Education, 51(4), 305-319.
Coleman, H. (2010). Teaching learning in Pakistan: The role of language in education.
Retrieved on January 05, 2012.
Coyle, D. (2007a). Content and language integrated learning: Motivating learners and
teachers. In the CLIL teachers toolkit: A classroom guide. Nottingham: The University of
Nottingham.
Coyle, D. (2007b). Content and learning integrated learning: Towards a connected research
agenda for CLIL pedagogies. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,
10(5), 543-562.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated
learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coyle , D. (2010). Foreword. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain:
Implementation, Results and Teacher Training (pp. 7-8). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars
Publishing.
Coyle, D. (2011). ITALIC Research report investigating student gains: Content and language
integrated learning. Edinburgh: University of Aberdeen.
Corporation for Public Broadcasting. (2004). Television goes to school: The impact of video on
student learning in formal education. Available:
http://www.cpb.org/stations/reports/tvgoestoschool/
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
USA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
approaches (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative
and qualitative research (4th Ed). Boston MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Cummins, J. (2009). Bilingual and immersion programs. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), The
handbook of language teaching (pp. 161–181). Malden: Wiley Blackwell.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007a). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL)
classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007b). Academic language functions in a CLIL environment. In
D. Marsh, & D. Wolff (Eds.), Diverse contexts-converging goals (201- 210).Frankfurt:
Peter Lang.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smith, U. (2007). Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom
discourse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning
(CLIL): Current research from Europe. In W. Delanoy, & L. Volkmann (Eds.), Future
perspective for English language teaching (139-157). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content and language integrated learning: From practice to principles?
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smith, U. (2007). Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom
discourse. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning
(CLIL): Current research from Europe. In W. Delanoy, & L. Volkmann (Eds.),
Future perspective for English language teaching (139- 157). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content and language integrated learning: From practice to principles?
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204.
Darn, S. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): A European overview.
ERIC Education Resources Information Center.
Daryanto. (2010). Media pembelajaran. Bandung: Satu Nusa (Sarana Tutorial Nurani Sejahtera).
De Zarobe, Y. R. (2008). CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque
country. International CLIL Research Journal, 60-73.
De Zarobe, Y. R., & Jiménez Catalán, R. M. (2009). Content and language integrated learning:
evidence from research in Europe / edited by Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe and Rosa María
Jiménez Catalán. Bristol, Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction – a growing global
phenomenon. University of Oxford: British Council.
Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (2009). Handbook of qualitative research. US: Sage
Publication, Inc.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.(2005). Rencana Strategis Departemen
Pendidikan Nasional 2005-2009. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2007a). Panduan
penyelenggaraan rintisan SMA bertaraf internasional. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah
Menengah Atas.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2007b). Pedoman penjaminan mutu
sekolah/madrasah bertaraf internasional pada jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2008a). Panduan
penyelenggaraan rintisan SMA bertaraf internasional. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2008b). Panduan
penyelenggaraan rintisan Sekolah Dasar bertaraf internasional.Jakarta: Direktorat
Pembinaan Taman Kanak-Kanak dan Sekolah Dasar.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2008c). Panduan pelaksanaan pembinaan rintisan
Sekolah Menengah Pertama bertaraf internasional (SMP- SBI). Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan
Sekolah Menengah Pertama, Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan
Menengah, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2009a). Panduan
penyelenggaraan rintisan SMA bertaraf internasional. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah
Menengah Atas.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2009b). Peta kemampuan bahasa Inggris
pendidik dan tenaga kependidikan rintisan sekolah bertaraf internasional berdasarkan Test
of English for International Communication (TOEIC). Jakarta: Direktorat Tenaga
Kependidikan, Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga
Kependidikan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2009b). Peta kemampuan bahasa Inggris
pendidik dan tenaga kependidikan rintisan sekolah bertaraf internasional berdasarkan Test
of English for International Communication (TOEIC). Jakarta: Direktorat Tenaga
Kependidikan, Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga
Kependidikan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Djamarah, S. B. (2005). Guru dan anak didik dalam interaksi edukatif: suatu pendekatan
teoritis psikologis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Dobson, A., Murillo, M. D. P., &Johnstone, R., (2010). Bilingual education project Spainevaluation
report: Findings of the independent evaluation of the Bilingual Education
ProjectMinistry of Education (Spain) and British Council (Spain). Ministerio De Educacion
Instituto deFormación del Profesorado, Investigación e InnovaciónEducativa (IFIIE), and British
Council,Spain.
Dewdney A. & Ride. P.(2006). The new media handbook. New York:Routledge.
Dugger, J.R., William, E. & Naik, N. (2001). Clarify misconceptions
betweentechnology education and educational technology. Technology teacher,61(1);
31-36.
Durmaz B (2007). The Effects of the Concept Cartoons to the Success of the Students and Sensory
Features in the Constructivist Science Teaching (Mu?la Provincial, Administrative
District Sample), Master’s Dissertation, Mu?la University, Mu?la, Turkey.
Education Sector Analytical and Capacity Development Partnership (ACDP). (2013).
Evaluation of International Standard Schools in Indonesia. Jakarta: ACDP.
Ekici G (2010). An examinaation of the high school student’s perceptions about biology
laboratory environment education. E-Journal of New World Sci. Acad., 5(3): 180-186.
Ericson, K.A., Oliver, W,.(2002). Cognitive skills, In: Learning and Skills,
Mackintosh N.J. & Colman A.M(ed.),Zysk i S-Ka, Poznan.
Essay, UK. (2013). Theories of Perception. Retrieved from
http;//www.ukessay.com/essays/psychology/theories-perception 2618. php? vref=1 .
Eurydice. (2006). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at school in Europe.
Brussels: Eurydice.
Fisch, S.M. (2003). The impact of Cyberchase on children’s mathematical problem
solving: Cyberchase Season 2 executive summary. Teaneck, NJ: MediaKidz.
Fitriati. (2010). Community participation in education: Does decentralisationmatter? an
Indonesian case study of parental participation in school
management.Thesis. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Fledderus, W., Ron, K. & Floor, S. (2011). Teaching with CLIL: Learning and language
come together. Retrieved November, 28, from
http://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/1874/208325/1/Teaching+with+CLIL++L
anguage+and+Learning+Come+Together.pdf
Flew, T. (2004). New media an introduction. Oxford University Press.
Floris, F. D. (2014). Learning subject matter through English as the medium of
instruction: students’ and teachers’ perspectives. Asian Englishes, 16(1), 47- 59.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J.H. (2000). The interview: From structure questions to negotiated
text. in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in
education. New York: Magrew-Hill.
Fraser BJ (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and
applications. Learn. Environ. Res., 1:7-33.
Freeman, D. (1994). Educational linguistics and the knowledge base of language teaching.
In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and
linguistics (pp. 180-198). Washington, DC: Gearogetown University Press.
Friedel, J., Marachi, R., &Midgley, C. (2002). ”Stop embarrassing me!” Relations among
student perceptions of teachers, classroom goals, and maladaptive behaviors. Paper presented
at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Garcia, M. A. (2009). Looking at CLIL: Teachers’ views, learners’ attitudes and
vocabulary outcomes (Unpublished master’s thesis), Universidad de La Roja: Spain.
Garcia, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st Century: A global perspective.
West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research, competencies for analysis and
applications (7??ed). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airaisian, P. W. (2011). Educational research.
competencies for analysis and applications, tenth edition. New Jersey: Pearson.
Genesee, F. (2002). What do we know about bilingual education for majority language
students? In T. K. Bhatia, & W. Ritchie (Eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and
multiculturalism (pp. 547-576). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in
a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247-273.
Gill, Saran K.: 2005, Language policy in Malaysia: Reversing direction, Language Policy,
4(3), 241-260.
González, M. B. (2007). Good practice in content and language integrated learning.
Spain: BeCLIL Project.
Graaff de, R., Koopman, G. J., & Westhoff, G. (2007). Identifying effective L2 pedagogy
in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Vienna English Working Papers, 16(3),
12-19.
Graaff de, R., Koopman, G. J., Anikina, Y., & Westhoff, G. (2007). An observation tool for
effective L2 pedagogy in Content and Language-Integrated Learning (CLIL). International Journal of
Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 603-624.
Graddol, D. (2006).Why global English may mean the end of ‘English as a foreign language. UK:
British Council.
Hadisantosa, N., Huong, T. T., Johnstone, R., Keyuravong, S., & Lee, W. (2010).
Learning through English: Policies, challenge, and prospect, insights from Asia. Jakarta:
British Council.
Hamers, J., & Blanc, M. (2000). Bilinguality and bilingualism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Hammond, J. 2001. Scaffolding and language. In J. Hammond (ed.), Scaffolding: Teaching
and learning in language and literacy education. Newtown,Australia:
Primary English Teaching Association.
Han, J. & Singh, M. (2014). Internationalizing education through english medium
instruction: Key theoretic-pedagogical ideas. Research project report. Kingswood:
University of Western Sydney.
Hand, B. M., Prain, V., & Yore, L. D. (2001). Sequential writing tasks’ influence on science
learning. In P. Tynjala, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool:
Integrating theory and practice.Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Hapsari, A.M. (2011). Prose pembelajarandi RintisanSekolahBertarafInternasional (RSBI) kota
dan kabupatenSukabumiberdasarkanpersepsisiswa:Studi di SMA N 3 kota Sukabumidengan SMA N 1
CibadakkabupatenSukabumi. (skripsi), Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Harsuciningsih, R. (2009). A descriptive study at a designated international standard school SMP
Negeri 1 Sukoharjo in the 2008/2009 academic year. Thesis.UniversitasSebelasMaret,
Surakarta.
Hartoyo. (2011). Curriculum and material development: Syllabus/course outline. (Program
PascaSarjana), UniversitasMuhammadiyah Professor DR. Hamka, Jakarta.
Haryanto, E. (2011). Implementation of the international standard school in Jambi
province, Indonesia: Implication for policy reforms(doctoral
dissertation),Central Luzon State University, Philippine.
Haryanto, E. (2012). Listening to students voice: A survey of implementation of English
as medium instructions in an international standard school in Indonesia. Journal
of Education and Practice, 3(15), 111-119.
Haryanto, E. (2013). Language policy: Administrators and teacher’s view English as medium of
instruction implementaion in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(2), 48-56.
Hashimah, Z. (2003). Dilemma of form one students in learning science in English: My personal
experience. Paper presented at the TED-ELTC ETeMS Conference: Managing
Curricular Change. Retrievedfrom
http://www.eltcm.org/eltc/Download/conferences/8_Abstracts.pdf
Henderson, J., & Wellington, J. (1998). Lowering the language barrier in learning and teaching
science. School Science Review, 79(288), 35-46.
Hidayat, R. G. & Mirjam, A. (2012). The use of English in the teaching of mathematics
and science at R-SMA-BI 1 Situbondo. English Language Education Universitas
Negeri Malang, 2(2).Retrieved from
http://jurnalonline.um.ac.id/artikel/do/detail-article/1/7/71
Hoyle, P., & Stone, C. (2000). Developing the literate scientist. In J. Sears, & P.
Sorensen (Eds.), Issues in science teaching. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
Howell, K.W., &Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision
making (3??ed.). Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.
Ibrahim, J. (2001). The implementation of EMI (English Medium Instruction) in Indonesian
Universities: Its opportunities, its threat, its problems, and its possible solutions.
Sastra Inggris, 3(1), 121-138.
Indiana Departemnt of Education. (2010). Indian academic standards, assements, and IDOEsSupport for
educators. Retrieved from http://www.doe.in.gov/standards
Ipnugraha. (2013). Pioneering of schools with international standard to respond the
globalization. Journal of Education and Learning, 7 (3), 153-158.
Isahak, H. Abdul Latif, H. G. MdNasir, M. Abdul Halim, I & Mariam, M. N. (2008). Kesan dasar
pengajaran matematik dan sains dalam bahasa Inggris di sekolah rendah [the effects of using
English as the medium of instruction for mathematics and science in primary school],
(UPSI Research Code 03-12-95- 03), Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris , Perak, Malaysia.
Jacobs, M., Gawe, N. & Vakalia, N.C.G. (2002). Teaching-learning dynamics: Aparticipative
approach for OBE 2nd edition. Johannesburg : Heinemann.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2000). Educational research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Johnson, B..(2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed
approaches (2nd ed.). USA: Pearson Education Inc.
Jones, C. (2004). The role of language in the learning and teaching of science. In M. Monk, & J.
Osborne (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp. 88-103).
Buckingham: Open University Press.
Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/BAPPENAS. (2010). Ringkasan jalan percepatan
pencapaian tujuan pembangunan milenium di Indonesia.Jakarta,
Indonesia: Kementerian Perencanaan PembangunanNasional/BAPPENAS.
Kimball, J. (1996). What are we doing when we “Talk Science”?.The Internet TESL Journal, 2,8.
Kirkpatrick, A. (2011). English as a medium of instruction in Asian education [from primary to
tertiary]: Implications for local languages and local scholarship. Applied Linguistics, 2,
99-120.
Kirkpatrick, A. (2012). English in ASEAN: Implications for regional multilingualism.
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(4), 331-344.
Koul, Rekha B &Fisher, Darell L. (2006). Students’ perceptions of teachers’
interpersonal behavior andidentifying exemplary teachers. Retrieved from
clt.curtin.edu.au/events/conferences/tlf/tlf2006/refereed/koul.html.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.
Hertforshire: Phonex ELT.
Kubiatko, M. (2006). How do teachers use information and
communicationtechnology in biology teaching: Information & communication technology in natural
science education.Bratislava, Slovakia: Comenius University,
Kustulasari, A. (2009). The international standard school project in Indonesia: A policy
document analysis(master’s thesis), Columbus, Ohio, Ohio State University.
Kvale, S., & Svend, B. (2008). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing.
USA: Sage Publication.
Lantolf, J.P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford:
OxfordUniversity Press.
Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated
learning courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1(1), 31-42.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. (2009). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences
than similarities. ELT Journal, 6(4), 367-375.
Lasagabaster, D., & de Zarobe, Y. R. (2010). CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher
training. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lo, Y. Y. & Lin, A. M. Y. (2015). Special Issue: Designing Multilingual and Multimodal
CLIL Frameworks for EFL Students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism. 18(3), 261-269.
Maljers, A., Maarsh, D., & Wolff, D. (2007). Windows on CLIL: Content and language
integrated learning in the European spotlight. The Hague: European Platform for Dutch Education.
Marfu’ah, D. (2012). The implementation of ICT based learning in English teaching and learning
process at SMP RSBI (A qualitative study at SMP Sukoharjo in the academic year 2011/2012)
(master’s thesis), Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta.
Marsh, D. (Ed.). (2002). CLIL/EMILE – The European Dimension: Actions, Trends and
Foresight Potential. Brussels: European Commission.
Marsh, D., & Langé, G. (2000). Using languages to learn and learning to use languages.
Jyväskylä, Finland: UniCOM.
Marsh, D., Maljers, A., & Hartiala, A.-K. (2001). Profiling European CLIL
classrooms: Language opendors. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Marsh, D., Mehisto, P., Wolff, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2010). European framework for CLIL teacher
education: Aframework fortthe professional development of CLIL teachers. Graz: European Centre
for Modern Languages.
Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R. (2005).The language of evaluation, appraisal in English:
Palgrave Macmillan, London & New York.
Masruroh, K. R. (2012). Inventarisasi kendala guru biology RSBI dan upaya
penyelesaianya dalam pembelajaran biologi serta hubungannya dengan hasil belajar biologi di
kabupaten Jember. (Skripsi),Universitas Negeri Jambi, Jambi.
Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. MacBeath J, Schratz
M, Meuret D, Jakobsen L (2000). Self-Evaluation in European
Schools: A Story of Change, London: Routledge.
McBrien, J. L., Brandt, L., & Brandt, R. S. (1997). The language of learning: A guide to
education terms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
Mehisto, P. (2008a). CLIL Counterweights: Recognising and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL.
International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 93-119.
Mehisto, P. (2008b). Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and
multilingual education. Oxford: Macmillan Education.
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language
Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Oxford: Macmillan
Publishers Ltd.
Mercer, N. 1994. Neo-Vygotskian theory and classroom education”. In B. Stierer & J. Maybin (Eds),
Language, literacy and learning in educational practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters
Ltd.
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education
(2??Ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Meyer, O. (2010). Toward’s quality CLIL: successful planning and teaching strategies.
Puls, 33. 11-29.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook
(3?? Ed.). USA: Sage Publications Inc.
Miller, P. (1998). The holistic curriculum. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Mochammad, J. Z. A. (2012). ELF students’ attitude towards learning English language :
The case Libyan secondary school student. Asian Social Science, 8(2), 119-134.
Mohammad, F. (2009). Teaching mathematics and science in English: The teachers’
voices. English Language Teaching, 2(2), 141-147.
Mohan, B. A. (2001) The second language as a medium of learning, in English as a second language
inthe mainstream: Teaching,learning and identity (eds B. A. Mohan, C. Leung, and C. Davison).
Longman: New York.
Moleong, L. J. (2004). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Morgado, M., & Coelho, M. (2013). CLIL vs English as the medium of instruction: The Portuguese
higher education polytechnic context. Egitania Sciencia (12), 123 - 145.
Mulyasa. (2006). Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Muslich, M.
(2011). KTSP: Pembelajaran berbasis kompetensi dan kontekstual.
Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Nelson-Smith, Kenyetta Q. (2008). Learning styles and student’s perception of teachers’
attitudes and its relation to truancy amongAfrican American students in secondary
education. LSU Doctoral Dissertation:Louisiana State University.
Nikula, T. (2007). Speaking English in Finnish content-based classrooms. World Englishes,
26(2), 206-223.
Nilawati, H. T.-T., Richard, J., Sonthida, K., & Wonkey, L. (2010). Learning through English:
Policies, challenges and prospects. Malaysia: British Council East Asia.
Nordin bin Aziz (2005). Students’ perception on teaching and learning mathematics in
English.Retrieved from http://eprints.utm.my/1507/1/KERTASINT.pdf
Nunan, D. (2003). The Impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices
in the Asia- Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589-613.
Nykiel, A. (2007). Handbook of marketing research methodologies.Binghamton, NY: The Haworth
Hospitality and Tourism Press.
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. Student
performance in reading, mathematics, and science (Volume 1). Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2016). Insights from The Talis-Pisa Link Data Teaching Strategies for
Instructional Quality. Paris: OECD.
OECD/Asian Development Bank. (2015). Education in Indonesia: Rising to the challenge.
Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ohta, A. S., (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally
appropriateassistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar.
InJ. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning.
Oxford:Oxford University Press.
Osborne J, Collins S, (2001). Pupils' views of the role and value of the science
curriculum. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 23(5): 441-467.
Othman,Talib., Wong S-L., Shah C. A., & Nabilah A. (2009). Uncovering Malaysian students’
motivationv to learning scienceEuropean Journal of Social Science, 8(2), 266-276.
Parsons, T. & Edward Shils, eds. (1951). Toward a general theory of action.
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Pasela, W.P. (2016). Penerapan pendekatan Somatik, Auditori, Visual, dan Intelektual (SAVI)
berbantuan media animasi terhadap hasil belajar pada materi siste respirasi kelas XI SMA
Negeri 6 Palembang. Skripsi, Universitas Sriwijaya.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Publication.
Perraton, H. (2000). Open and distance learning in the developing world. London:
Routledge.
Phan, L.H., Joyce, K.&Brendan, C. (2013). Nation building, English as an
international language, medium of instruction, and language debate: Malaysia and possible ways
forward. International and Comparative Educations, 2(2), 58-72.
Phoenix DA (2000). Looking towards reform - the student focus, J. Biol. Educ., 34(4): 171.
Potyrala, K. (2002). Computer-aided biology teaching in Biologycal and
environmental Education No 1 (1).
Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in CLIL classrooms. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Puspitaningsih, D. J.N. (2013). A descriptive study on bilingual method in teaching biology at the
seventh grade of SBI class in SMP N 1 Boyolali in 2011/2012. (Skripsi), Universitas Muhammadiyah,
Surakarta.
Puslitjaknov. (2010). Laporan studi evaluasi penyelenggaraan RSBI
padajenjangpendidikan dasar dan menengah. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan dan
Inovasi Pendidikan Balitbang Kemdiknas.
Radcliffe, R., Caverly, D., Hand, J., & Franke, D. (2008). Improving reading in the middle
school science classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(5), 398-408.
Raguenaud, V. (2009). Bilingual by choice: Raising kids in two (or more!) languages.
Boston : Nicholas Brealey Publication.
Rahmadini, R.S. (2014). Pengaruh media animasiterhadaphasilbelajarsiswa
padamaterisistemekskresi di SMP Negeri 1 Palembang.Skripsi. Universitas Sriwijaya.
Rahman, T. (2007). Language planning in higher education:A case study of
Pakistan.Pakistan: Oxford University Press.
Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang dasar negara republik Indonesia tahun 1945.Sekretariat
Negara:Jakarta.
Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang No.20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan
nasional. Sekertariat Negara: Jakarta.
Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang No. 32 tahun 2004 tentang ekonomi daerah.
Sekretariat Negara: Jakarta.
Republik Indonesia. (2005). Undang-Undang No 14 tahun 2005 tentang guru dan dosen.
Sekretariat Negara: Jakarta.
Republik Indonesia. (2005). Permendiknas RI No. 19 tahun 2005 tentang standar nasional
pendidikan. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Republik Indonesia. (2006a). Permendiknas RI No. 23 tahun 2006 tentang standar kompetensi
lulusan. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Republik Indonesia. (2006b). Permendiknas RI No. 22 tahun 2006 tentang standar isi.
Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Republik Indonesia. (2007a). Permendiknas RI No 26 tahun 2007 tentang kerja sama perguruan tinggi
negeri di Indonesia dengan perguruan tinggi negeri atau lembaga lain di luar negeri.
Jakarta: Dikdasmen.
Republik Indonesia. (2007b). Permendiknas RI No. 16 tahun 2007 tentang standar
kualifikasi akademik dan kompetensi guru. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Republik Indonesia. (2009a). Permendiknas RI No. 78 tahun 2009 tentang
penyelenggaraan sekolah bertaraf internasional pada jenjang pendidikan dasar dan menengah.
Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Depdiknas. (2009b). Peta Kemampuan Bahasa Inggris Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan
Rintisan Sekolah Bertaraf Internasional Berdasarkan Test of English for International
communication (TOEIC). Jakarta : Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan, Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan
Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Republik Indonesia. (2010). Peraturan pemerintah RI No. 17 Tahun 2010 tentang pengelolaan
dan penyelenggaraan pendidikan. Sekretariat Negara: Jakarta.
Rizzuto, M. (2008). A teachers’ perspective: Science talks. In A. S. Rosebery, & B. Warren (Eds.),
Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students’ strengths (pp. 13-20).
US: National Science Teachers Association.
Rosebery, A. S., & Ballenger, C. (2008). Essay: Creating a foundation through student
conversation. In A. S. Rosebery, & B. Warren (Eds.), Teaching science to English language
learners: Building on students’ strengths (pp. 1- 12). Arlington: NSTA Press.
Ross, K., Lakin, L., & Callaghan, P. (2004). Teaching secondary science, 2?? Ed.
London: David Fulton Publisher.
Ruswenda, Uus. (2011). Berbaga faktor dalam supervisi akademik pengawas sekolah menengah
kejuruan (SMK) di Kabupaten Kuningan. (Thesis tidak dipublikasikan). Jakarta:
Universitas Indonesia.
Sabri, A.(2005). Strategi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: QuantumTeaching.
Saidi, S. and Zurida, H. I.: 2004, Masalah pembelajaran bahasa bukan saintifik dalam pembelajaran
sains, Diges Pendidik, 4(1), 32-43.
Saka, A (2006). The effect of 5 model on removing science student teachers'
misconceptions about genetics, PhD Dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University,
Trabzon Turkey.
Sanjaya, W. (2008). Strategi pembelajaran berorientasi standar proses pendidikan.
Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Saragih, Erikson. (2014). The practice of bilingual instruction of math and natural
sciences at international standard schools in Medan Indonesia [Education Supplement].
Research Gate, p. 286-296.
Sari, D. N. (2010). Sebuahpenelitiandeskriptifterhadappenggunaan
bahasaInggrissebagaisebuah media pengajarandalam prosesbelajarmengajar matematika, fisika,
dan biologi di kelas RSBI di SMP Negeri 1 Bondowoso.Skripsi. Universitas
Negeri Malang, Malang.
Setiawan, J.E. (2013).Teacher's beliefand student's perception regarding content and language
integrated learning: A case studyat
SMAYPVDPBontang(Unpublished master’s thesis),MulawarmanUniversity, Kalimantan Timur.
Setyorini, A.&Ahmad, S. (2011). Teaching mathematics and sciences in English in pilot
international standard high schools in Indonesia. Journal of Language and Literature, 2,
82-87.
Shrum, J. L., & Glisan, E. W. (2000). Teacher's handbook: Contextualized language instruction.
Boston: Beth Kramer.
Silva, D. M. (2006). O impacto dos estilos de aprendizagem no ensino de
contabilidade(doctoraldissertation), University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brasil.
Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research theory, method and practice. London: SAGE
Publications.
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Skinner, B.F. (1974). About behaviourism. In Francisco J.L. (Ed.), The Spanish Journal
of Psychology (pp. 178-187). Spain: University Complutense of Madrid.
Smith, R. G. (1990). Thinking and practice in primary science classrooms: A case
study(Doctoral dissertation), University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Sopia, Md Yassin, OngEngTek.,Alimon, H., Baharom, S., & Ying, L. Y. (2010). Teaching
Science through English: Engaging pupils cognitively. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3).
Retrieved from http://www.icrj.eu/13-744
Sopia. Md Yassin., Ong Eng Tek, Sadiah B.&Hasinah A. (2011). Monograph CLIL (content, language,
integrated) research project Malaysian. Sultan Idris Education University, TanjungMalim
Malaysia.
Sopia. Md Yassin., Marsh, D., Tek, O.E.T., & Ying, L.Y. (2009). Learners’
perceptions towards the teaching of science through English in Malaysia: A quantitative
analysis. International CLILResearch Journal, 1(2), 54–69.
Šorgo, J., Ver?kovnik, T., & Kocijan?i?, S. (2010). Information and Communication Technologies
(ICT) in biology teaching in Slovenian secondary schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,
Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 37- 46.
Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, Lincoln, & S. Yvonna (Eds.),
Handbook of qualitative research second edition (pp. 134-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications, Inc.
Stohler, U. (2006). The acquisition of knowledge in bilingual learning: An empirical study on the
role of language in content learning. VIEWZ: Vienna English Working Papers, 15(3), 41-46.
Stoller, F. L. (2008). Content-based instruction. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. H.
Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education. Vol. 4: Second and foreign
language education (pp. 59–70). New York: Springer.
Sudhanshu, Y. (2014). Effect of multi media teaching on achievement in
biology.International Journal of Education and Psychological Research (IJEPR), 3(1)
41-45.
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian pendidikan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Sultan, S., Helen B & Bill E. (2012). English medium of instruction (EMI) in
Indonesian public junior secondary school: Student’s language use,
attitudes/motivation and foreign language outcomes. ACTA International TESOL
Conference, Cairns Australia. Victoria University, Australia.
Sumintono, B., Zunia, D.A. & Siti, N.A. (2013). The Investigation of challenges in teaching and
learningmathematics through English at secondary schools inkepulauan Riau, Indonesia.
International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE 2013). Universiti Teknologi
Malaysia, Malaysia.
Sundusiyah, A. (2010). 'Teachers in international-standard schools: What is missing? What can be
improved? What does it take?'.International Conference of Indonesian Students (KIPI),
Melbourne.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook, & B.
Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swanborn, P. (2010). Case study research. London: Sage Publiser.
Tan, May. (2011). Mathematics and science teachers’beliefand practices regarding the
teachingoflanguageincontentlearning.Language Teaching Research,15(3),325-342.
Trianto. (2011). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif-progresif: Konsepl andasan dan
implementasinya pada kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada
Media Group.
Troncale, C. (2002). Content based instruction, cooperative learning, and CALP
instruction: Addressing the whole education of 7-12 ESL students. Working Papers in TESOL
& Applied Linguistics, 2(3).
Turner, T., & Broemmel, A. (2006). 14 writing strategies. Science Scope, 30(4), 27-31. Turner, T.,
& Dimarco, W. (1998). Learning to teach science in the secondary school.
London: Routledge.
UNESCO. (2010). Education policy and reform,secondary information regional
information base: Indonesia. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for
Education.
University of Cambridge. (2007). Cambridge syllabus-international examination.
Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Van de Craen, P., Mondt, K., Allain, L., & Gao, Y. (2007). Why and how CLIL works. an outline for a
CLIL theory. Vienna English Working Papers, 16(3), 70-78.
Viera, A.J, Joanne, M, Garrett. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: the Kappa
statistic. Research Series, 37(5), 360-363.
Vizconde, C. J. (2006). Attitudes of students teacher towards the use of English as
language of instruction for science and mathematics in the Philippines. The Linguistics
Journal, 1(3), 7-33.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological
processes. USA: The President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Walqui, A. 2006. Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. The
International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9(2): 159-180.
Walqui, A. & L. van Lier. 2010. Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English
language learners. San Francisco: WestEd.
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education.
Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Westhoff, G. J. (2004). The art of playing a pinball machine. Characteristics of
effective SLA-tasks. Babylonia, 12(3), 58-62.
Widyaningrum, D. (2012). An analysis of student’s perceptions on the use of English in the
teachers’ teaching of some subjects in RSBI first year classes at Kesatrian I
Senior High School(master’s thesis), Fakultas Bahasa
UniversitasKatolikSoegijapranata, Semarang.
Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2009). Research method in education: An introduction (9th
ed.). Mexico City: Pearson.
Wilkinson, R. (2004). Integrating content and language: Meeting the challenge of a multilingual
higher education. The Netherlands: Maastricht University.
Wisudawati & Agustina, A. (2009). Code Switching in The Biology Teaching Learning of
Immersion Program of RSBI SMP N 1 Wates Kulon Progo Grade VIII F Yogyakarta. Retrieved from
https://repository.usd.ac.id/9634/
Wojtowicz, L., Mark, S., Thomas C., &Thomas H. (2010). The Impact of ICT andgames
based learning on content and language integrated learning:International
conference ‘ICT for language learning’ 4th edition. Scotland: University of the West of
Scotland.
Xanthou, M. (2011). The impact of CLIL on L2 vocabulary development and content knowledge. English
Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(4), 116-126.
Xiaoping, L. (2012). Teaching language and content: Instructure straregiesin abiligual science
class at a Chinese University. Higher Education,1(2), 92-102.
Yamauchi, L. G. (2008). Effect of multimedia instructional material on students learning
and their perceptions of the instruction(master’sthesis), Lowa State Univesity, Ames Lowa.
Ya, C. S. (2006). Taiwan case: EFL teacher’s perceptions of English language policy
at the elementary level in Taiwan. Educational Studies, 32(3), 265-283.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
Yip, D. Y., Tsang, W. K., & Cheung, S. P. (2003). Evaluation of the effects of medium of
instruction on the science learning of Hong Kong secondary students: Performance on the
science achievement test,Bilingual Research Journal: The Journal of the National Association for
Bilingual Education, 27(2), 295-331.
Yore, L. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of
language arts and science research. International Jurnal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725.
Yumiko, Y. (2007). A study of billigual education in the Philippines. International
Studies, 9, 175-201.
Yushau, B. &Bokhari M., (2004) Language and mathematics: The case of bilingual Arabs”.
Second UAE math day. United Arab Emirates: American University of Sharjah.
Zamjani, I. (2011). Penyelenggaraan rintisan sekolah bertaraf internasional: Sebuah
kajian kebijakan. BalitbangKemendikbud.