UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan sebuah modul pembelajaran secara kendiri dalam topik Aruhan
Elektromagnet, iaitu Modul Interaktif Elektromagnet (MI-EM) dan mengenal pasti; (i) kesan
penggunaannya terhadap pencapaian Ujian Aruhan Elektromagnet (UAE) bagi pelajar matrikulasi
yang berbeza sikap (novis atau pakar),
(ii) hubungan antara sikap pra pelajar dengan sikap pasca pelajar, serta (iii) hubungan antara
perubahan sikap (positif, negatif, atau tiada perubahan) dengan kategori pencapaian UAE
(meningkat, menurun, atau kekal). Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk pembangunan
berasaskan model ADDIE (Analyse, Design, Develop, Implement, dan Evaluate) dan kaedah
kuasi eksperimental. Seramai 373 orang pelajar Program Matrikulasi Satu Tahun dari tiga buah kolej
matrikulasi telah dipilih secara rawak berstrata sebagai responden kajian ini. Data dikumpulkan
menggunakan tiga set instrumen iaitu Soal Selidik Kebolehgunaan Modul MI-EM, UAE dan Soal
Selidik Sikap Terhadap Pembelajaran Fizik (STPF). Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan
inferensi menerusi Ujian-t, Ujian Anova, Ujian Korelasi Phi dan Ujian Spearman’s Rho.
Melalui kajian ini, Modul MI-EM berjaya dibangunkan dan mempunyai kesahan yang baik (I-CVI =
0.92) serta nilai peratus persetujuan kebolehgunaan yang memuaskan, 82.9%. Dapatan
kajian juga menunjukkan bahawa terdapat perbezaan pencapaian UAE yang signifikan antara
kumpulan yang berbeza modul pembelajaran kendiri (t(371) = .045). Namun perbezaan pencapaian UAE
adalah tidak signifikan bagi kelompok pelajar yang berbeza sikap (F(1,371) = .123). Seterusnya,
perhubungan yang lemah telah dikenal pasti antara; (i) sikap pra dengan sikap pasca (Ø (373) =
.321), dan
(ii) perubahan sikap dengan kategori pencapaian UAE (r (373) = .223). Kesimpulannya, kajian ini
menunjukkan bahawa penggunaan Modul MI-EM dapat menyokong pembelajaran secara
kendiri dan membantu meningkatkan pencapaian pelajar matrikulasi dalam topik Aruhan
Elektromagnet. Selain itu, kajian yang lebih komprehensif di kalangan pelajar
matrikulasi perlu dilakukan bagi menggalakkan
pembelajaran secara kendiri dan interaktif terutamanya dalam subjek Fizik.
|
References |
Adams, W. K., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2006). New instrument for measuring student beliefs about Physics and learning Physics: The Colorado learning attitudes about Science survey. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 2(1), 010101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010101
Afzal, M. T., Safdar, A., & Ambreen, M. (2015). Teachers perceptions and needs towards the use of E-Learning in teaching of Physics at secondary level. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(8), 1045–1051. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-8-16
Ahmad Fkrudin Mohamed Yusoff, & Ammar Badruddin Romli. (2018). Kebolehgunaan aplikasi mudah alih (Mobile Apps) bagi kursus Sains, Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan dalam Islam (M-ISTECH) di Politeknik Malaysia. Malaysian Online Journal of Education, 2(1), 18–28.
Ahmad Johari Sihes. (2010). Konsep pembelajaran. Dlm. Psikologi Pendidikan (ms. 1– 8). Johor : Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/10357/
Ahmad Sobri Hashim, Wan Fatimah Wan Ahmad, & Rohiza Ahmad. (2011). Mobile learning course content application as a revision tool: The effectiveness and usability. International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Robotics, 184–187. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPAIR.2011.5976941
Ahmad Tarmimi Ismail, Rosly Jaafar, Nik Syaharudin Nik Daud, & Shahrul Kadri Ayop. (2016). Quantitative comparison of the effect factors in Electromagnetic Induction using Audacity freeware. 3rd International Conference on Reseach, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Science, PE1-6. Diperoleh daripada http://seminar.uny.ac.id/icriems/sites/seminar.uny.ac.id.icriems/ files/prosiding/PE-01.pdf
Airasian, P., & Gay, L. R. (2000). Educatinal research: Competence for analysis and application (ed. ke-6). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Aji, S. D., Hudha, M. N., Huda, C., & Gufran, G. (2018). Computer animation with Adobe Flash Professional Cs6 in Newton’s Law. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1), 012131. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012131
Akbari, R., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2014). A critical analysis of the selection criteria of expert teachers in ELT. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(8), 1653– 1658. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.8.1653-1658
Al-Ajlan, A., & Zedan, H. (2008). Why moodle. 12th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/FTDCS.2008.22
Aliff Nawi, Mohd Isa Hamzah, & Surina Akmal Abd Sattai. (2014). Potensi penggunaan aplikasi mudah alih ( Mobile Apps ) dalam bidang Pendidikan Islam. O-JIE: Online Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2), 26–35. Diperoleh daripada https://ojie.um.edu.my/article/view/5470
Alragawi, N. A. (2018). The acceptance of Moodle mobile in smartphones - Case study – Al-Andalus University. Saba Journal of Information Technology and Networking, 6(1), 1–8. Diperoleh daripada http://www.ojs.sabauni.net/index.php/SJITN/article/view/93
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (ed. Ringkas). New York: Longman. Diperoleh daripada https://quincycollege.edu/wp-content/uploads/Anderson-and-rathwohl_Revised- Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf
Apperson, J. M., Laws, E. L., & Scepansky, J. A. (2006). The impact of presentation graphics on students’ experience in the classroom. Computers and Education, 47, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.09.003
Applefie, J. M., Huber, R., & Moallem, M. (2001). Constructivism in theory and practice: Toward a better understanding. The High School Journal, 84(2), 35–53. Diperoleh daripada http://www.jstor.org/stable/40364404 .
Arpac?k, Ö., Kur?un, E., & Gökta?, Y. (2018). Using interactive whiteboards as an assistive technology for students with intellectual disability*. Journal of Education and Future, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.418054
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (ed. ke-8). USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Diperoleh daripada https://www. modares.ac.ir/uploads/Agr.Oth.Lib.12.pdf
Asiksoy, G., & Özdamli, F. (2016). Flipped classroom adapted to the ARCS model of motivation and applied to a physics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), 1589–1603. https://doi.org/10.12973/ eurasia.2016.1251a
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
Azham Hussain, Mkpojiogu, E. O. C., & Hussain, Z. (2015). Usability evaluation of a web-based health awareness portal on smartphone devices using ISO 9241-11 model. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6035
Azlina Mazlan. (2018). Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan modul pendekatan pengajaran berasaskan otak dengan integrasi i-Think dan Brain Gym untuk meningkatkan kefahaman konseptual dan motivasi belajar Fizik pelajar matrikulasi (Tesis Kedoktoran). Gelugor: Universiti Sains Malaysia. Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.usm.my/id/eprint/43625
Azraai Othman, Othman Talib, & Dani Asmadi Ibrahim. (2015). Analisis dokumen silibus Kimia Organik Matrikulasi berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 3(3), 1–11. Diperoleh daripada https://juku.um.edu. my/article/view/8162
Azwin Arif Abdul Rahim, Nor Yazi Khamis, Mohammad Musab Azmat Ali, Mohd Shafeirul Zaman Abd Majid, Supyan Hussin, & Mohamed Amin Embi. (2014). Development of self access internet based English module to support student Centred Learning (SCL) of Engineering Education. Asian Social Science, 10(7), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n7p153
Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Is working memory still working? American Psychologist, 56(11), 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.11.851
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficay: The excercise of control. New York: Worth Publishers.
Bandura, A., & Barab, P. G. (1971). Conditions governing nonreinforced imitation. Developmental Psychology, 5(2), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031499
Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2018). Computers & education mobile learning for Science and Mathematics school education : A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers & Education, 121, 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.006
Barma, S., & Daniel, S. (2017). Designing enhanced learning environments in Physics: An interdisciplinary collaborative approach producing an instrument for school success. Dlm. M. Romero, K. Sawchuk, J. Blat, S. Sayago, & H. Ouellet (Pnyt.), Game-Based Learning Across the Lifespan (ms. 91–113). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Beltrán, B. A. G., López, L. G., & Ortíz, A. R. (2016). User-Centered design in Moodle redesign for mobile use. Pistas Educativas, 38(120), 1212–1224. Diperoleh daripada http://www.itcelaya.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/pistas/article/view/609
Bloom, B. S., Krathwohl, D. R., & Masia, B. B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Dlm. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay. Diperoleh daripada https://books.google.com.my/books?id=e1VtswEACAAJ
Bogdanovi?, Z., Barac? , D., Jovanic? , B., Popovic? , S., & Radenkovic? , B. (2014). Evaluation of mobile assessment in a learning management system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12015
Borokhovski, E., Bernard, R. M., Tamim, R. M., & Schmid, R. F. (2018). Achievement and attitudes in technology-supported postsecondary education : Complexity of relationships through the lens of meta-analysis. Dlm. T. Bastiaens, J. Van Braak, M. Brown, L. Cantoni, M. Castro, R. Christensen, G. Davidson-Shivers, K. DePryck, M. Ebner, M. Fominykh, C. Fulford, S. Hatzipanagos, G. Knezek, K. Kreijns, G. Marks, E. Sointu, E. Korsgaard Sorensen, J. Viteli, J. Voogt, P. Weber, E. Weippl & O. Zawacki-Richter (Pnyt.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (ms. 1994–2003). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Diperoleh daripada https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/184439/.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Cai, S., Chiang, F. K., Sun, Y., Lin, C., & Lee, J. J. (2016). Applications of augmented reality-based natural interactive learning in magnetic field instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10494820.2016.1181094
Cano, E. M., Ruiz, J. G., & Garcia, I. A. (2013). Integrating a learning constructionist environment and the instructional design approach into the definition of a basic course for embedded systems design. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21574
Cardinot, A., & Fairfield, J. A. (2019). Game-Based Learning to engage students with Physics and Astronomy using a board game. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 9(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.2019010104
Cepni, S., Tas, E., & Ko¨se, S. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted material on students cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Computers and Education, 46(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2004.07.008
Chan, L. L., & Noraini Idris. (2017). Validity and reliability of the instrument using Exploratory Factor Analysis and Cronbach’s Alpha. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(10), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i10/3387
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s1532690xci0804_2
Chang, C., Chang, C. K., & Shih, J. L. (2016). Motivational strategies in a mobile inquiry-based language learning setting. System, 59, 100–115. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.system.2016.04.013
Chang, C. Y., Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2017). Trends and research issues of mobile learning studies in nursing education: A review of academic publications from 1971 to 2016. Computers and Education, 116, 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2017.09.001
Chang, H. Y., Hsu, Y. S., & Hung, J. Y. (2016). Adapting and customizing Web-based inquiry Science environments to promote Taiwanese students’ learning of Science. Dlm. M. H. Chiu (Pnyt.), Science Education research and practice in Asia: Challenges and opportunities. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981-10-0847-4_9
Chang, M. M., & Lan, S. W. (2019). Exploring undergraduate EFL students’ perceptions and experiences of a Moodle-based reciprocal teaching application. The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1708298
Chou, Y. H., & Shyu, H. Y. (2017). Virtual Laboratory of the Magnetic Field due to a Current Element. SITE 2017, 1484–1489. Diperoleh daripada http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/109911
Chua, Y. P. (2006). Asas statistik penyelidikan buku 2. Shah Alam: McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Chua, Y. P. (2014). Ujian Regresi, Analisis Faktor dan analisis SEM. Shah Alam: McGrawHill Education.
Chung, C., Hwang, G., & Lai, C. (2018). A review of experimental mobile learning research in 2010-2016 based on the activity theory framework. Computers & Education, 129, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.010
Clemente, F. J. G., Esquembre, F., & Wee, L. K. (2017). Deployment of physics simulation apps using Easy JavaScript simulations. Global Engineering Education Conference, (EDUCON), 1093–1096. https://doi.org/10.1109/ EDUCON.2017.7942985
Cobcroft, R., Towers, S., Smith, J., & Bruns, A. (2006). Mobile learning in review: Opportunities and challenges for learners, teachers, and institutions. Dlm. A. Brown (Pnyt), Learning on the Move: Proceedings of the online learning and teaching conference 2006. (ms. 21–30). Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.qut.edu.au
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (ed. ke- 8). New York: Routledge.
Covill, A. E. (2011). College students’ perceptions of the traditional lecture method. College Student Journal, 45(1), 92+.
Crawford, J., Butler-Hunderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., & Lam, S. (2020). View of COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra- period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, (1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (ed. ke-4). Boston: Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education : A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007
Crompton, H., Burke, D., Gregory, K. H., & Gräbe, C. (2016). The use of mobile learning in Science: A systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9597-x
Crouch, C. H., & Heller, K. (2012). Teaching Physics to Life Science students - Examining the role of biological context. Physics Education Research Conference 2011, 1413, 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3680019
Dani Asmadi Ibrahim, & Kamisah Osman. (2011). Kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, pengajaran tajuk Model Atom dan pencapaian objektif kursus Kimia. Seminar Majlis Dekan-Dekan Pendidikan IPTA, 105–122.
Darren, G., & Paul, M. (2010). Spss for Windows step by step : A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (ed. ke-10). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Davidsson, M., Johansson, D., & Lindwall, K. (2012). Exploring the use of augmented reality to support Science education in secondary schools. 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education, 218–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/WMUTE.2012.52
Dbowska, E., Girwidz, R., Greczy?o, T., Kohnle, A., Mason, B., Mathelitsch, L., Melder, T., Michelini, M., Ruddock, I., & Silva, J. (2013). Report and recommendations on multimedia materials for teaching and learning Electricity and Magnetism. European Journal of Physics, 34(3), L47–L54. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/34/3/L47
Delacre, M., Lakens, D., & Leys, C. (2017). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-Test instead of student’s t-Test. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.82
Dewitt, D., Norlidah Alias, & Saedah Siraj. (2015). Collaborative learning: Interactive debates using Padlet in a higher education institution. International Educational Technology Conference (IETC 2015), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1461445615613178
Dewitt, D., Saedah Siraj, & Norlidah Alias. (2014). Collaborative mLearning : A module for learning secondary school Science. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 89–101. Diperoleh daripada https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.17.1.89
DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Moote, J. (2019). 15/16-year-old students’ reasons for choosing and not choosing Physics at A Level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 1071–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018- 9900-4
Dimopoulos, D. I., & Pantis, J. D. (2003). Knowledge and attitudes regarding sea turtles in elementary students on Zakynthos, Greece. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(3), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960309603491
Dinçer, S., & Do?anay, A. (2017). The effects of multiple-pedagogical agents on learners’ academic success, motivation, and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 111, 74–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.005
Donnelly, R., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2005). Designing modules for learning. Dlm. G. O’Neill, S. Moore, & B. McMullin (Pnyt.), Emerging Issues in the practice of University learning and teaching. (ms. 99–110). Dublin: All Ireland Society for Higher Education (AISHE). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-006-0193-6
Doolittle, P. E. (1997). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development as a theoretical foundation for cooperative learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 8(1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114500000799
Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology- enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of Electromagnetism concepts? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15327809jls1402_3
Douglas, K. A., Yale, M. S., Bennett, D. E., Haugan, M. P., & Bryan, L. A. (2014). Evaluation of Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020128. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020128
Dwi, S. (2017). Mobile learning application development fostering high order thinking skills on Physics learning. International Conference on Education, Business and Management (ICEBM-2017), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.15242/ HEAIG.H0117523
Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (ed. ke-5). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 4405(73)90057-5
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research (ed. ke-1). Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.intcom.2007.07.003
Erdil, N. O., Harichandran, R. S., Nocito-Gobel, J., Li, C. Q., & Carnasciali, M. I. (2017). Impact of integrated e-learning modules in developing an entrepreneu mindset based on deployment at 25 institutions. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28467
Fairuz Aliaa Fadzil, & Siti Nur Diyana Mahmud. (2019). Pembelajaran & kualiti guru STEM : Cabaran & inisiatif. Global Education: Perspectives, Innovations, Issues, and Challenges, 3, 1–15.
Fatin Aliah Phang, Mohd Salleh Abu, Mohammad Bilal Ali, & Salmiza Salleh. (2014). Faktor penyumbang kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran Sains: Satu analisis sorotan tesis. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n3.2
Fox, E., & Riconscente, M. (2008). Metacognition and self-regulation in James, Piaget, and Vygotsky. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9079-2
Francis, L. J., & Greer, J. E. (2007). Measuring attitude towards Science among secondary school students: The affective domain. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17(2), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514990170207
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (ed. ke-4). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (ed. ke-4). Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Gay, L. R., & Diehl, P. L. (1992). Research methods for business and management. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595
Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Amalan dan analisis kajian (ed. ke-2). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002
Goldschmid, B., & Goldschmid, M. L. (1973). Modular instruction in higher education: A review. Higher Education, 2, 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162534
Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(3), 532–560. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15327752jpa6803_5
Grenier, D. P. (2018). The relationship between mobile learning and academic achievement in a community college system online environment (Thesis Kedoktoran). Diperoleh daripada http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=2731&context=doctoral
Guido, R. M. D. (2013). Attitude and motivation towards learning Physics. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 2(11), 2087–2094. Diperoleh daripada http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.02293
Guisasola, J., Zuza, K., & Almudi, J. M. (2013). An analysis of how Electromagnetic Induction and Faraday’ s law are presented in general Physics textbooks, focusing on learning difficulties. European Journal of Physics, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/34/4/1015
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM Integration in middle school Life Science: Student learning and attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016- 9612-x
Hacieminoglu, E. (2016). Elementary school students’ attitude toward science and related variables. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(2), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2016.288a
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (ed. ke-7). England: Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.1038/259433b0
Hamidah Yusof, Jamal Yunus, & Khalid Musa. (2014). Kaedah penyelidikan pengurusan pendidikan. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Hazimah Ashamuddin, Nurul Syafiqah Yap Abdullah, & Mazlina Mat Darus. (2020). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan soal selidik terhadap pembelajaran Fizik (STPF). Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan Guru, Jilid 15, 25–38.
Herrera, F. T., & Soriano, A. T. (2016). The Efficacy of the strategic intervention materials (SIM) to the achievement in Physics of a selected group of public school students in Las Nieves, Agusan del Norte. Annals of Studies in Science and Humanities, 2(2), 22–33. Diperoleh daripada http://journal.carsu.edu.ph/index.php/assh/article/view/84
Ho, H. N. J., & Liang, J. C. (2015). The relationships among scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning Science, and motivation of learning Science: A study of Taiwan high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(16), 2688–2707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1100346
Hookway, G., Mehdi, Q., Hartley, T., & Bassey, N. (2013). Learning Physics through computer games. Proceedings of CGAMES’2013 USA, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1109/CGames.2013.6632617
Hudha, M. N., Aji, S. D., & Huda, C. (2018). E-Rubric: Scientific work based on Android for Experimental Physic. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012100
Hudiya Adzhar, Fariza Khalid, & Aidah Abdul Karim. (2017). Penggunaan Massive Open Online Course ( MOOC ) sebagai kaedah pembelajaran baharu. Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21: Trend integrasi teknologi, 179–188. Diperoleh daripada https://www.academia.edu/31631536/Penggunaan_Massive_Open_ Online_Course_MOOC_sebagai_Kaedah_Pembelajaran_Baharu
Jamal Nordin Yunus, Marinah Awang, & Mahaliza Mansor. (2019). Tingkahlaku kepimpinan transformasi di sekolah rendah luar bandar. EDUCATUM Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol5no1.3
Jamali, S. M., Ahmad Nurulazam Md Zain, Mohd Ali Samsudin, & Ebrahim, N. A. (2017). Self-efficacy, scientific reasoning, and learning achievement in the STEM project-based learning literature. The Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 2(2), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0b013e31826fc1e4
Kalogiannakis, M., Ampartzaki, M., Papadakis, S., & and Skaraki, E. (2018). Teaching natural Science concepts to young children with mobile devices and hands-on activities . A case study. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 9(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTCS.2018.090965
Kamaruddin Ilias, & Che Aleha Ladin. (2018). Pengetahuan dan kesediaan revolusi industri 4.0 dalam kalangan pelajar Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Ipoh. O- JIE : Online Journal of Islamic Education, 6(2), 18–26. https://ojie.um.edu.my/ article/view/14787
Kampeza, M., & Ravanis, K. (2009). Transforming the representations of preschool- age children regarding geophysical entities and physical geography. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 3(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.125
Karacop, A. (2017). The effects of using jigsaw method based on cooperative learning model in the undergraduate Science laboratory practices. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 420–434. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050314
Keller, C. J., Finkelstein, N. D., Perkins, K. K., & Pollock, S. J. (2006). Assessing the effectiveness of a computer simulation in conjunction with tutorials in introductory Physics in undergraduate Physics recitations. Physics Education Research Conference 2005, 818(1), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2177035
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga Lepas Menengah). Putrajaya: Pengarang. Diperoleh daripada https://www.moe.gov.my/en/dasarmenu/pelan- pembangunan-pendidikan-2013-2025
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018a). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Fizik Tingkatan 4 dan 5. Putrajaya: Pengarang. Diperoleh daripada https://anyflip.com/qbqoq/iogk/
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018b). Kad Laporan Pencapaian Malaysia dalam PISA 2018. Putrajaya: Pengarang. Diperoleh daripada https://www.moe.gov.my/en/ pemberitahuan/announcement/pencapaian-malaysia-dalam-pisa-2018
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018c). Perangkaan Pendidikan Malaysia 2018. Putrajaya: Pengarang. Diperoleh daripada https://www.moe.gov.my/en/muat- turun/laporan-dan-statistik/perangkaan-pendidikan
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Ringkasan Eksekutif Pelan Transformasi ICT Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 2019-2023. Putrajaya: Pengarang. Diperoleh daripada https://www.mohe.gov.my/muat-turun/warga/manual-dan- garis-panduan-1/ict/seminar-transformasi-ict-kpm/559-ringkasan-eksekutif- pelan-transformasi-ict-kementerian-pendidikan-malaysia-2019- 2023?format=html
Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi Malaysia. (2018). Framing Malaysian Higher Education 4.0 : Future-Proof Talents (ed. ke-1). Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. Diperoleh daripada http://jpt.mohe.gov.my/portal/penerbitan/framing-malaysian- higher-education-4-0-future-proof-talent
Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A. K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers’ practice and students’ motivation to learn Mathematics and Science. Learning and Instruction, 35, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.003
Kohlmyer, M. A., Caballero, M. D., Catrambone, R., Chabay, R. W., Ding, L., Haugan, M. P., Marr, M. J., Sherwood, B. A., & Schatz, M. F. (2009). Tale of two curricula : The performance of 2000 students in introductory Electromagnetism. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 5(2), 020105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020105
Kok, K. H. (2017). Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan modul pembelajaran kendiri berasaskan multimedia bagi Topik Cahaya Fizik tingkatan empat. (Disertasi Kedoktoran). Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodologu methods and techniques (Second Revised Edition). New Delhi: New Age International (P) Limited.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Layla Hasan. (2018). Usability problems on desktop and mobile interfaces of the Moodle Learning Management System (LMS). 2018 International Conference on E-Business and Applications (ICEBA 2018), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/3194188.3194192
Lee, J. (2016). Attitude toward school does not predict academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.009
Lee, T. T., & Kamisah Osman. (2012). Interactive multimedia module in the learning of Electrochemistry: Effects on students’ understanding and motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1323–1327. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.sbspro.2012.05.295
Lee, Y. C., Lau, K., & Wing, V. Y. Y. (2016). Blended learning for building student- teachers’ capacity to learn and teach science-related interdisciplinary subjects. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(2), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-09-2016-0029
Lemmer, M., Kriek, J., & Erasmus, B. (2018). Analysis of students’ conceptions of basic Magnetism from a complex systems perspective. Research in Science Education, 50, 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9693-z
Leow, F. T., & Neo, M. (2014). Interactive multimedia learning: Innovating classroom education in a Malaysian university. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 99–110. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1022913.pdf
Li, F., Bao, Y., Wang, D., Wang, W., & Niu, L. (2016). Smartphones for sensing. Science Bulletin, 61(3), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0954-1
Li, J., & Singh, C. (2016). Developing and validating a conceptual survey to assess introductory Physics students’ understanding of Magnetism. European Journal of Physics, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/38/2/025702
Li, J., & Singh, C. (2012). Developing a Magnetism conceptual survey and assessing gender differences in student understanding of Magnetism. Physics Education Research Conference 2011, 43–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/ 1.3679989
Lilia Halim, Yong, T. K., & Tamby Subahan Mohd Meerah. (2014). Overcoming students’ misconceptions on Forces in equilibrium: An action research study. Creative Education, 5(11), 1032–1042. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.4236/ ce.2014.511117
Limongelli, C., Lombardi, M., Marani, A., Sciarrone, F., & Temperini, M. (2016). A recommendation module to help teachers build courses through the Moodle Learning Management System. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 22(1–2), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2015.1077277
Lin, C. H., Huang, S. H., Shih, J. L., Covaci, A., & Ghinea, G. (2017). Game-based learning effectiveness and motivation study between competitive and cooperative modes. 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 1, 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.34
Lok, W. F. (2012). Concerns of online learning portal among Science lecturers in Perak Matriculation College. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Peringkat Kebangsaan Kali Ke-7 Program Matrikulasi Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, 1–15. Diperoleh daripada https://www.academia.edu/13519390/Concerns_of_online_ learning_portal_among_science_lecturers_in_Perak_Matriculation_College
López, J. A., Collazos, C. A., Velas, F. L. G., & Moreira, F. (2018). Using pervasive games as learning tools in educational contexts: a systematic review. International Journal of Learning Technology, 13(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.1504/ ijlt.2018.092094
Lourenço, O. (2012). Piaget and Vygotsky: Many resemblances, and a crucial difference. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(3), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.006
Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Magana, A. J., Sanchez, K. L., Shaikh, U. A. S., Jones, M. G., & Tan, H. Z. (2017). Exploring multimedia principles for supporting conceptual learning of electricity and magnetism with visuohaptic simulations. Computers in Education Journal, 8(2), 8–23. Diperoleh daripada http://www.hpcg.purdue.edu/ papers/Magana17CEJ.pdf
Maghfiroh, L., Subchan, W., & Iqbal, M. (2017). Problem based learning through Moodle for increasing self regulated learning students (Goal setting and planing). The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v4i8.32
Mahjabeen, W., Alam, S., Hassan, U., Zafar, T., Butt, R., Konain, S., & Rizvi, M. (2017). Difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency in multiple choice questions. Annals of PIMS, 13(4), 310–315. Diperoleh daripada https://apims.net/index.php/apims/article/view/9
Maria, M., Faaizah Shahbodin, & Naim Che Pee. (2018). Malaysian higher education system towards industry 4.0 - Current trends overview. 3rd International Conference on Applied Science and Technology (ICAST’18), 1, 020081. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055483
Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers and Education, 68, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.021
Maruši, M., & Sliško, J. (2012). Influence of three different methods of teaching Physics on the gain in students’ development of reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 2(34), 301–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693. 2011.582522
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15326985ep3201_1 Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/ A:1013184611077
McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
Meerbaum-Salant, O., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. (Moti). (2013). Learning computer science concepts with Scratch. Computer Science Education, 23(3), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2013.832022
Mimi Mohaffyza Mohamad, Nor Lisa Sulaiman, Lai, C. S., & Kahirol Mohd Salleh. (2015). Measuring the validity and reliability of research instruments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2015.08.129
Miner, A., Mallow, J., Theeke, L., & Barnes, E. (2015). Using Gagne’s 9 events of instruction to enhance student performance and course evaluations in undergraduate nursing course. Nurse Educator, 40(3), 152–154. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000138
Moeller, J., Salmela-aro, K., Lavonen, J., & Schneider, B. (2015). Does anxiety in Science classrooms impair Math and Science motivation ? - Gender differences beyond the mean level. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2), 229–254. Diperoleh daripada http://genderandset.open.ac.uk/ index.php/genderandset/article/view/398
Mohamad Siri Muslimin, Norazah Mohd Nordin, Ahmad Zamri Mansor, & Melor Md Yunus. (2017). The design and development of Mobieko: A mobile educational app for Microeconomics module. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, (ed. Khas), 221–255. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli.2017.7804
Mohamed Nor Azhari Azman, Aisyah Mohamad Sharif, Balamuralithara Balakrishnan, Mohd Ikhwan Hadi Yaacob, Sadiah Baharom, Haniza Hanim Mohd Zain, Fadhil Harfiez Abdul Muthalib, & Nuramalina Samar. (2018). Retooling Science teaching on stability topic for STEM education : Malaysian case study. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 13(10), 3116–3128. Diperoleh daripada http://www.myjurnal.my/public/article-view.php?id=128428
Mohammad Hafiz Zaini, & Saedah Siraj. (2016). Kebolehlaksanaan penggunaan Kod Quick Response terhadap pembelajaran herba kesihatan dalam kalangan pelajar institut pengajian tinggi di Malaysia. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 4(2), 20–30. Diperoleh daripada https://juku.um. edu.my/article/view/8196
Mohd. Jasmy Abd Rahman, Mohd Arif Ismail, & Muhammad Nasir. (2014). Development and evaluation of the effectiveness of computer-assisted physics instruction. International Education Studies, 7(13), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p14
Mohd Afifi Bahurudin Setambah. (2017). Pembangunan dan pengujian modul kaedah pengajaran berasaskan adventure terhadap pencapaian statistik asas, kemahiran (Tesis Kedoktoran). Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Diperoleh daripada https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=4178
Mohd Afifi Bahurudin Setambah, Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin, Mazlini Adnan, & Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad. (2017). Adventure based learning module: Content validity and reliability process. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2669
Mohd Majid Konting. (2009). Kaedah penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Mohd Noor Badlilshah Abdul Kadir, Mohd Mustamam Abdul Karim, & Nurulhuda Abd. Rahman. (2016). Sikap terhadap pembelajaran Fizik dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian dalam kalangan pelajar Sains. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 19(1), 31–51. Diperoleh daripada http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10879/
Morris, N. P., Lambe, J., Ciccone, J., & Swinnerton, B. (2016). Mobile technology: students perceived benefits of apps for learning Neuroanatomy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12144
Mueanploy, W. (2016). A study: Effect of students peer assisted learning on Magnetic Field achievement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 710, 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/710/1/012025
Muhamad Shakir Saad, Sabariah Sharif, & Muralindran Mariappan. (2018). Pembangunan modul robot permainan Topik Respirasi Sel menggunakan model ADDIE. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 8(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol8.1.5.2018
Muhammad Asri Madmor, Tee, T. K., Mohamed Nor Azhari Azman, Ridzwan Che Rus, Zaliza Hanapi, Jailani Md Yunos, Yee, M. H., & Mimi Mohaffyza Mohamad. (2016). Modul Peta Minda Buzan dan pencapaian pelajar pendidikan asas vokasional di Malaysia: Satu kajian keberkesanan. Journal of Society and Space, 12(3), 139–144. Diperoleh daripada https://ejournal.ukm.my/gmjss/article/ view/17646
Mukhid, A. (2008). Strategi self-regulated learning (Perspektif teoritik). TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.19105/ tjpi.v3i2.239
Mukhid, A. (2009). Self-efficacy (Perspektif teori kognitif sosial dan implikasinya terhadap pendidikan). TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/HiPINEB.2018.00011
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-based assessment: A literature review of publications in major referred journals from 2009 to 2018. Computers and Education, 125, 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.006
Noraffandy Yahaya, & Nur Fazila Salleh. (2011). Modul pembelajaran kendiri (MPK) bagi perisian Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0. Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 1–8. Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11984/
Norsaliza Sabu. (2018). The effect of using interactive multimedia courseware with pedagogical agent in learning nutrition towards higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(2), 623–635. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i2/3971
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (ed. ke-2). New York: Mc-Graw Hill.
Nur’Ainiza Nuruddin, & Mordiah Morshidi. (2017). Meningkatkan penguasaan Topik Keelektrikan dan Kemagnetan pelajar kolej matrikulasi melalui pendekatan Conceptual Problem Solving-Principle Justification Plan (CPS-PJP). Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan Guru, 12, 74–89.
Nurshamela Saim, Marlina Ali, & Nor Hasniza Ibrahim. (2014). Proses pembinaan modul Pro-Mc Physics : Fasa analisis dan reka bentuk bagi model reka bentuk pengajaran ADDIE. International Education Postgraduate Seminar (IEPS) 2015. Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62108/
Nurul Nadirah Mohd Kasim, & Fariza Khalid. (2016). Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the higher education institution context: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644
Nurul Syafiqah Yap Abdullah, Nor Shaida Md Saufi, & Mohd Ikhwan Hadi Yaacob. (2018). Microcomputer-Based Laboratory (MBI) system with automated measuring approach for basic Electronics. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 10(3S), 87–96. Diperoleh daripada https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jfas/ article/view/171484
Nurulhuda Abdul Rahman, Noor Azman Razalee, Razak Abd Samad Yahya, & Ong, E. T. (2011). The development and validation of learning attitudes about Physics (LAAP) inventory. Jurnal Sains Dan Matematik, 3(1), 39–49. Diperoleh daripada https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JSML/article/view/376
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards Science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
Padmanaban Madawan, Ruhizan Muhammad Yasin, & Mohd Isa Hamzah. (2017). Pengetahuan, sikap dan kesediaan pelajar kolej matrikulasi terhadap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) dalam pembelajaran. Seminar on Transdisiplin Education (STEd2017), 541–547. Diperoleh daripada https://sted18. wordpress.com/prosiding-sted-2017/proceeding/
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual (ed. ke-3). Wales:Allen & Unwin.
Patil, R., Palve, S., Vell, K., & Boratne, A. (2016). Evaluation of multiple choice questions by item analysis in a medical college at Pondicherry, India. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 3(6), 1612–1616. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20161638
Perdana, F. A., Sarwanto, Sukarmin, & Sujadi, I. (2017). Development of E-Module combining Science process skills and dynamics motion material to increasing critical thinking skills and improve student learning motivation senior high school. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v1i1.5112
Petrovic, N., Jeremic, V., Cirovic, M., Radojicic, Z., & Milenkovic, N. (2014). Facebook Versus Moodle in Practice. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.896581
Pieper, F. C., & Serrano, A. (2016). The ‘state of art’ of the research on Magnetic Field teaching : A review of Physics education literature between 1995 and 2015. Acta Scientiae, 18(3). Diperoleh daripada http://www.periodicos.ulbra.br/index.php/ acta/article/view/2327/2054
Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning what is self-regulated learning? New directions for teaching and learning, 63, 3–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219956304
Plotz, T. (2017). Students’ conceptions of radiation and what to do about them. Physics Education, 52(1), 014004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/52/1/014004
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrovi?, V. M., & Jovanovi?, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers and Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
Prapulla, S. B., Shetty, J., Kulkarni, V. A., Subramanya, K. N., Uma, B. V, Kumar, P., & Shobha, G. (2020). Design and analysis of an online course using Moodle platform. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 33(ed. Khas), 270– 274. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i0/150158
Prawat, R. S. (1996). Constructivisms, modern and postmodem. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653268
Pujol, J., Blanco-Hinojo, L., Martínez-Vilavella, G., Canu-Martín, L., Pujol, A., Pérez- Sola, V., & Deus, J. (2019). Brain activity during traditional textbook and audiovisual-3D learning. Brain and Behavior, 9(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1427
Rafiza Abdul Razak, & Maryam Abdul Rahman. (2013). Pembinaan media pengajaran berasaskan multimedia di kalangan guru ICTL. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1(2), 20–31. Diperoleh daripada https://juku.um.edu.my/ article/view/7952
Reibstein, D. J., & Lovelock, C. H. (1980). The direction of causality between perceptions, affect, and behavior: An application to travel behavior. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/208780
Rochadel, W., Da Silva, S. P., Da Silva, J. B., Luz, T. D., & Alves, G. R. (2012). Utilization of remote experimentation in mobile devices for education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2012.6201112
Rozana Sani. (2019, Mei 1). Preparing job-ready and future-proof graduates. New Straits Times. Diperoleh daripada https://www.nst.com.my/education/ 2019/05/484522/preparing-job-ready-and-future-proof-graduates
Ruzaini Hisyam Daud. (2017). Pembangunan dan penilaian modul pengajaran dan pembelajaran berasaskan multimedia Subjek Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi sekolah rendah (Tesis Sarjana). Tanjong Malim : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Diperoleh daripada http://ir.upsi.edu.my/3371/
Saedah Siraj. (2004). Pembelajaran mobile dalam kurikulum masa depan. Masalah Pendidikan, 27, 128–142.
Saefullah, A., Siahaan, P., & Sari, I. M. (2017). The correlation of learning independence attitudes and student’s learning achievement on Physics learning based-portfolio. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 3(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v3i1.1741
Sa?lam, M. (2010). Students’ performance awareness, motivational orientations and learning strategies in a problem-based electromagnetism course. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1). Diperoleh daripada https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/v11_issue1/saglam/index.htm
Saifolrudin Khalid Mahzan, & Mohamad Khairi Othman. (2019). Pembangunan sistem prototaip E-Pendidikan pondok di Kedah. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(26), 1–26. Diperoleh daripada http://www.myjurnal.my/public/article-view.php?id=141998
Salim, B. (2012). An application of UTAUT Model for acceptance of social media in Egypt: A Statistical Study. International Journal of Information Science, 2(6), 92– 105. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijis.20120206.05
Sani, R. A., & Malau, T. (2017). The effect of problem based learning (PBL) model and self regulated learning (SRL) toward Physics problem solving ability (PSA) of students at senior high school. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-3-8
Saregar, A., Zubaedi, Z., Parmin, P., Jamaludin, W., & Septiani, R. (2019). Feasibility test of mobile learning with Schoology: Efforts to foster the students’ learning interest on Magnetism. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012060
Sari, D. P., & Madlazim, M. (2015). Computer simulation in Mechanics teaching and learning: a case study on students’ understanding of Force and Motion. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 5(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v5n2.p33-43
Sarrab, M., Hafedh, A. S., & Bader, A. M. (2015). System quality characteristics for selecting mobile learning applications. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 18–28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092872
Savelsbergh, Elwin R., Prins, G. T., Rietbergen, C., Fechner, S., Vaessen, B. E., Draijer, J. M., & Bakker, A. (2016). Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: A meta-analytic study. Educational Research Review, 19(19), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.003
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
Shah, I., & Khan, M. (2015). Impact of multimedia-aided teaching on students’ academic achievement and attitude at elementary level. US-China Education Review A, 5(5), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2015.05.006
Shaharom Noordin. (1994). Penghasilan dan penilaian keberkesanan modul pengajaran kendiri Fizik di kalangan pelajar berbeza kebolehan dan jantina pada peringkat tingkatan empat (Tesis Kedoktoran). Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Shaharudddin Md Salleh. (2008). Pembangunan modul pembelajaran kendiri Keelektromagnetan, Fizik tingkatan lima berasaskan pendekatan konseptual melalui visual (Tesis Kedoktoran). Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.utm.my/11853/
Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. Dlm. R. Andrews and C. Haythornthwaite (Pnyt.), The Sage Handbook of Elearning Research (ms. 221–247). Sage publications.
Sidek Mohd Noah, & Jamaluddin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Singh, C. (2008). Interactive learning tutorials on quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 76(4), 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2837812
Siti Adilah Sabarudin, Sarani Zakaria, & Kamisah Osman. (2020). Measuring current attitude towards Science of matriculation students involved in innovation competition through project-based learning in Malaysia. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 3(1)(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.jssh.2019.2.1
Siti Halijah Ngadiman, & Mohd Faizal Jamaludin. (2018). Hubungan di antara kemahiran kerja berpasukan dan kemahiran komunikasi dalam kalangan pelajar semesta akhir Politeknik. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 3(19), 1–18. Diperoleh daripada https://ssrn.com/abstract=3277360
Siti Nor Aisah Moktar, Zaliza Hanapi, Tee, T. K., Suriani Mohamed, & Ridzwan Che Rus. (2018). Kesediaan, penerimaan dan pengoperasian guru Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi terhadap amalan dalam pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah. Sains Humanika, 10(3–3), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v10n3-3.1520
Siti Rohaida Hashim. (2017). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan modul pengajaran dan pembelajaran tajuk jatuh bebas dan gerakan luncuran dan keberkesanannya terhadap pencapaian pelajar (Disertasi Sarjana). Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Diperoleh daripada https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg. php?det=4215
Siti Zaharah Alias, Mohd Nasir Selamat, Khadijah Alavi, & Kadir Arifin. (2018). Industry 4.0: A systematic review in Technical and Vocational education and training. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 32(4), 66–74. Diperoleh daripada http://spaj.ukm.my/ppppm/jpm/article/view/437
Sreelakshmi, R., McLain, M., Rajeshwaran, A., Rao, B., Jayakrishnan, R., & Bijlani, K. (2015). Gamification to enhance learning using Gagne’ s learning model. 2015 6th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2015.7395197
Stemler, L. (1997). Educational characteristics of multimedia: a literature review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(3–4). https://doi.org/10.5555/264828.264833
Subashini Annamalai. (2014). Implementing ARCS model to design a motivating multimedia E-Book for Polytechnic ESL Classroom. 8(8), 57–60. https://journal.utem.edu.my/index.php/jtec/article/view/1319
Suhanna Zainudin, Lilia Halim, & Zanaton Ikhsan. (2015). How 60 : 40 policy affect the development of Science curriculum in Malaysia. Proceeding: 7th International Seminar on Regional Education, 3, 1396–1405.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (ed. ke-5). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.1037/022267
Tan, E. L., & Heh, D. Y. (2018). Teaching and learning Electromagnetic polarization using mobile devices. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 60(4), 112– 121. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2018.2839959
Tan, F. D. H., Whipp, P. R., Gagné, M., & Van Quaquebeke, N. (2018). Students’ perception of teachers’ two-way feedback interactions that impact learning. Social Psychology of Education, 22(1), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018- 9473-7
Techakosit, S., & Nilsook, P. (2015). Using augmented reality for teaching Physics. International E-Learning Conference 2015, Thailand Cyber University.
Testa, I., Capasso, G., Colantonio, A., Galano, S., Marzoli, I., Scotti di Uccio, U., Trani, F., & Zappia, A. (2018). Development and validation of a university students’ progression in learning Quantum Mechanics through Exploratory Factor Analysis and Rasch Analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 1464–5289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1556414
Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2009). Multiple Perspectives of Conceptual Change in Science and the Challenges Ahead. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 32(2), 89–104. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ910936
Tuada, R. N., Kuswanto, H., Saputra, A. T., & Aji, S. H. (2020). Physics mobile learning with scaffolding approach in Simple Harmonic Motion to improve student learning independence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 0–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012043
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards Science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323737
Tural, G., & Tarakç?, D. (2017). Effects of physical models and simulations to understand daily life applications of Electromagnetic Induction. Research in Science and Technological Education, 35(3), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1295370
Uvathi Mariappan, Arsaythamby Veloo, & Kanageswari Suppiah Shanmugam. (2018). Pembinaan dan pengesahan instrumen kemahiran insaniah bagi Subjek Perakaunan di matrikulasi. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 6(4), 29–39. Diperoleh daripada https://juku.um.edu.my/article/view/15769
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children. Dlm. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (ms. 79–91).
Wan Faizal Ismayatim. (2019, September 27). Kerajaan Risau Penurunan Pelajar Pilih Aliran STEM. Berita Harian Online. Diperoleh daripada https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2019/09/611487/kerajaan-risau- penurunan-pelajar-pilih-aliran-stem
Wang, J. Y., Wu, H. K., & Hsu, Y. S. (2017). Using mobile applications for learning: Effects of simulation design, visual-motor integration, and spatial ability on high school students’ conceptual understanding. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.032
Wang, J., Zahra Hazari, Cass, C., & Lock, R. (2018). Episodic memories and the longitudinal impact of high school physics on female students’ physics identity. International Journal of Science Education, 40(13), 1543–1566. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1486522
Warliani, R., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2017). Implementation of 7e learning cycle model using technology based constructivist teaching (TBCT) approach to improve students’ understanding achievment in Mechanical Wave material. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1848, 050005 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983961
Winatha, K. R., & Abubakar, M. M. (2018). The usage effectivity of project-based interactive E-Module in improving students’ achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 24(2), 198–202. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v24i2.20001
Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Generative learning processes of the brain. Educational Psychologist, 27(4), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2704_8
Wu, W., Wu, Y. J., Chen, C., Kao, H., & Lin, C. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies : A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 59(2), 817–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.016
Yee, L. S., & Yazid Abdul Manap. (2018). Attitude towards Science among lower secondary students in Johor Bahru. EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology (EJSMT), 5(2), 40–46. Diperoleh daripada https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/journal/EDSC
Yildirim, H. I., & Sensoy, O. (2018). Effect of Science teaching enriched with technological practices on attitudes of secondary school 7th grade students towards Science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(5), 947– 959. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060516
Yildirim, I. (2017). The effects of gamification-based teaching practices on student achievement and students’ attitudes toward lessons. Internet and Higher Education, 33(2016), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.002
Yildiz, E. P., Tezer, M., & Uzunboylu, H. (2018). Student opinion scale related to moodle LMS in an online learning environment: Validity and reliability study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 12(4), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i4.9205
Zainiah Mohamed Isa, Juppri Bacotang, & Mazlina Che Mustafa. (2017). Kesahan kandungan Modul Literasi Awal (Modul Lit-A) pada peringkat kanak-kanak berumur 2+, 3+ dan 4+ tahun. Jurnal Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak, 6, 57–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37134/jpak.vol6.1.5.2017
Zajkov, O., Gegovska-Zajkova, S., & Mitrevski, B. (2017). Textbook-caused misconceptions, inconsistencies, and experimental safety risks of a grade 8 Physics textbook. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9715-0
Zakaria Salameh. (2017). The impact of systematic multimedia instruction on enhancing students' achievement in the course of language evaluation. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(4), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.4.879
Zanato Iksan, Lilia Halim, & Kamisah Osman. (2006). Sikap terhadap Sains dalam kalangan pelajar Sains di peringkat menengah dan matrikulasi. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 14(2), 131–147. Diperoleh daripada http://www.myjurnal.my/public/article-view.php?id=12771
Zhai, X., Zhang, M., Li, M., & Zhang, X. (2019). Understanding the relationship between levels of mobile technology use in high school Physics classrooms and the learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 750–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12700
Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845– 862. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031004845
Zlatkovic, D., Denic, N., Petrovic, M., Ilic, M., Khorami, M., Safa, A., Wakil, K., Petkovi?, D., & Vuji?i?, S. (2020). Analysis of adaptive e-learning systems with adjustment of Felder-Silverman model in a Moodle DLS. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 803–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22251
Zoraini Wati Abas. (1995). Implementation of computers in Malaysian schools: Problems and successes. Dlm. D. Watson & D. Tinsley (Pnyt.), Integrating information technology into education. Boston: Springer US. Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34842-1_15
Zuza, K., Almudí, J. M., Leniz, A., & Guisasola, J. (2014). Addressing students’ difficulties with Faraday’s law: A guided problem solving approach. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010122
Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for Science learning: Review of research. Computers and Education, 94, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.001
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |