UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Main Author :Hazimah Ashamuddin
Title :Pembangunan dan kesan modul interaktif elektromagnet terhadap pencapaian pelajar matrikulasi yang berbeza sikap
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :2021
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan sebuah modul pembelajaran secara kendiri dalam topik Aruhan  Elektromagnet, iaitu Modul Interaktif Elektromagnet (MI-EM) dan mengenal   pasti;   (i)   kesan    penggunaannya   terhadap   pencapaian   Ujian   Aruhan Elektromagnet (UAE) bagi pelajar matrikulasi  yang berbeza sikap (novis atau pakar), (ii) hubungan antara sikap pra pelajar dengan sikap pasca pelajar, serta (iii) hubungan antara   perubahan  sikap  (positif,  negatif,  atau  tiada  perubahan)  dengan  kategori pencapaian  UAE   (meningkat,  menurun,  atau  kekal).  Kajian  ini  menggunakan  reka bentuk   pembangunan    berasaskan   model   ADDIE   (Analyse,   Design,   Develop, Implement, dan Evaluate) dan kaedah  kuasi eksperimental. Seramai 373 orang pelajar Program Matrikulasi Satu Tahun dari tiga buah kolej  matrikulasi telah dipilih secara rawak berstrata sebagai responden kajian ini. Data dikumpulkan  menggunakan tiga set instrumen  iaitu  Soal  Selidik  Kebolehgunaan  Modul  MI-EM,  UAE  dan  Soal   Selidik Sikap  Terhadap  Pembelajaran  Fizik  (STPF).  Data  dianalisis  secara  deskriptif  dan  inferensi  menerusi  Ujian-t,  Ujian  Anova,  Ujian  Korelasi  Phi  dan  Ujian  Spearman’s Rho.  Melalui kajian ini, Modul MI-EM berjaya dibangunkan dan mempunyai kesahan yang   baik   (I-CVI   =    0.92)   serta   nilai   peratus   persetujuan   kebolehgunaan   yang memuaskan,  82.9%.  Dapatan   kajian  juga  menunjukkan  bahawa  terdapat  perbezaan pencapaian UAE yang signifikan antara  kumpulan yang berbeza modul pembelajaran kendiri (t(371) = .045). Namun perbezaan pencapaian UAE  adalah tidak signifikan bagi kelompok pelajar yang berbeza sikap (F(1,371) = .123). Seterusnya,  perhubungan yang lemah telah dikenal pasti antara; (i) sikap pra dengan sikap pasca (Ø (373) =  .321), dan (ii) perubahan sikap dengan kategori pencapaian UAE (r (373) = .223). Kesimpulannya, kajian   ini    menunjukkan   bahawa   penggunaan   Modul   MI-EM   dapat   menyokong pembelajaran   secara    kendiri   dan   membantu   meningkatkan   pencapaian   pelajar matrikulasi   dalam   topik   Aruhan    Elektromagnet.   Selain   itu,   kajian   yang   lebih komprehensif  di  kalangan  pelajar   matrikulasi  perlu  dilakukan  bagi  menggalakkan pembelajaran secara kendiri dan interaktif terutamanya dalam subjek Fizik.  

References

Adams, W. K., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman,  C.  E.  

(2006).  New  instrument  for  measuring  student  beliefs  about Physics  and  learning  Physics:  

The  Colorado  learning  attitudes  about  Science survey.  Physical  Review  Special  

Topics-Physics  Education  Research,   2(1), 010101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010101

 

Afzal,  M.  T.,  Safdar,  A.,  &  Ambreen,  M.  (2015).  Teachers  perceptions  and  needs towards 

the use of E-Learning in teaching of Physics at secondary level. American Journal           of      

     Educational           Research,           3(8),           1045–1051. 

https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-8-16

 

Ahmad    Fkrudin    Mohamed    Yusoff,    &    Ammar    Badruddin    Romli.    (2018). 

Kebolehgunaan aplikasi mudah alih (Mobile Apps) bagi kursus Sains, Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan dalam 

Islam (M-ISTECH) di Politeknik Malaysia. Malaysian Online Journal of Education, 2(1), 18–28.

 

Ahmad Johari Sihes. (2010). Konsep pembelajaran. Dlm. Psikologi Pendidikan (ms. 1– 8).   Johor   :  

 Penerbit   Universiti   Teknologi   Malaysia.   Diperoleh   daripada 

http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/10357/

 

Ahmad Sobri Hashim, Wan Fatimah Wan Ahmad, & Rohiza Ahmad. (2011). Mobile learning  course  content 

 application  as  a  revision  tool:  The  effectiveness  and usability. International Conference 

on Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Robotics, 184–187. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPAIR.2011.5976941

 

Ahmad  Tarmimi  Ismail,  Rosly  Jaafar,  Nik  Syaharudin  Nik  Daud,  &  Shahrul  Kadri Ayop. 

(2016). Quantitative comparison of the effect factors in Electromagnetic Induction  using  Audacity 

 freeware.  3rd  International  Conference  on  Reseach, Implementation  and  Education  of  

Mathematics  and  Science,  PE1-6.  Diperoleh daripada              

http://seminar.uny.ac.id/icriems/sites/seminar.uny.ac.id.icriems/ files/prosiding/PE-01.pdf

 

Airasian, P., & Gay, L. R. (2000). Educatinal research: Competence for analysis and application 

(ed. ke-6). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.

 

Aji, S. D., Hudha, M. N., Huda, C., & Gufran, G. (2018). Computer animation with Adobe  Flash  

Professional  Cs6  in  Newton’s  Law.  IOP  Conference   Series: Materials     Science     and     

Engineering,     288(1),     012131.     https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012131

 

Akbari, R., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2014). A critical analysis of the selection criteria of expert 

teachers in ELT. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(8), 1653–

1658. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.8.1653-1658

 

Al-Ajlan, A., & Zedan, H. (2008). Why moodle. 12th IEEE International Workshop on

Future       Trends       of       Distributed       Computing       Systems,       58–64. 

https://doi.org/10.1109/FTDCS.2008.22

 

Aliff   Nawi,   Mohd   Isa   Hamzah,   &   Surina   Akmal   Abd   Sattai.   (2014).   Potensi 

penggunaan aplikasi mudah alih ( Mobile Apps ) dalam bidang Pendidikan Islam. O-JIE:  Online  

Journal  of  Islamic  Education,  2(2),  26–35.  Diperoleh  daripada 

https://ojie.um.edu.my/article/view/5470

 

Alragawi, N. A. (2018). The acceptance of Moodle mobile in smartphones - Case study

–   Al-Andalus   University.   Saba   Journal   of   Information   Technology   and Networking,     

            6(1),                 1–8.                 Diperoleh                 daripada 

http://www.ojs.sabauni.net/index.php/SJITN/article/view/93

 

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich,  P.  

R.,  Raths,  J.,  &  Wittrock,  M.  C.  (2001).  A  taxonomy  for  learning, teaching,  and  

assessing:  A  revision  of  Bloom’s  Taxonomy  of  Educational Objectives    (ed.    Ringkas).    

New    York:    Longman.    Diperoleh    daripada 

https://quincycollege.edu/wp-content/uploads/Anderson-and-rathwohl_Revised- Blooms-Taxonomy.pdf

 

Apperson, J. M., Laws, E. L., & Scepansky, J. A. (2006). The impact of presentation graphics on 

students’ experience in the classroom. Computers and Education, 47, 116–126. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.09.003

 

Applefie,  J.  M.,  Huber,  R.,  &  Moallem,  M.  (2001).  Constructivism  in  theory  and 

practice: Toward a better understanding. The High School Journal, 84(2), 35–53. Diperoleh daripada 

http://www.jstor.org/stable/40364404 .

 

Arpac?k,  Ö.,  Kur?un,  E.,  &  Gökta?,  Y.  (2018).  Using  interactive  whiteboards  as  an 

assistive   technology   for   students   with   intellectual   disability*.   Journal   of 

Education and Future, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.418054

 

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (ed. ke-8). 

USA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Diperoleh daripada https://www. 

modares.ac.ir/uploads/Agr.Oth.Lib.12.pdf

 

Asiksoy, G., & Özdamli, F. (2016). Flipped classroom adapted to the ARCS model of motivation  and  

applied  to  a  physics  course.  Eurasia  Journal  of  Mathematics, Science and Technology 

Education, 12(6), 1589–1603. https://doi.org/10.12973/ eurasia.2016.1251a

 

Ausubel,  D.  P.  (1963).  The  psychology  of  meaningful  verbal  learning.  New  York: Grune and 

Stratton.

 

Azham Hussain, Mkpojiogu, E. O. C., & Hussain, Z. (2015). Usability evaluation of a web-based  

health  awareness  portal  on  smartphone  devices  using  ISO  9241-11

model. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6035

 

Azlina Mazlan. (2018). Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan modul pendekatan pengajaran  

berasaskan  otak  dengan  integrasi  i-Think  dan  Brain  Gym  untuk meningkatkan   kefahaman   

konseptual   dan   motivasi   belajar   Fizik   pelajar matrikulasi  (Tesis  Kedoktoran).  Gelugor: 

 Universiti  Sains  Malaysia.  Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.usm.my/id/eprint/43625

 

Azraai Othman,  Othman Talib, & Dani  Asmadi  Ibrahim. (2015). Analisis dokumen silibus Kimia 

Organik Matrikulasi berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum   &   Pengajaran   Asia   

Pasifik,   3(3),   1–11.   Diperoleh   daripada https://juku.um.edu.

my/article/view/8162

 

Azwin Arif Abdul Rahim, Nor Yazi Khamis, Mohammad Musab Azmat Ali, Mohd Shafeirul Zaman Abd Majid, 

Supyan Hussin, & Mohamed Amin Embi. (2014). Development  of  self  access  internet  based  English 

 module  to  support  student Centred Learning (SCL) of Engineering Education. Asian Social 

Science, 10(7), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n7p153

 

Baddeley,  A.  D.  (2001).  Is  working  memory  still  working?  American  Psychologist, 56(11), 

851–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.11.851

 

Bandura,  A.  (1997).  Self-Efficay:  The  excercise  of  control.  New  York:  Worth Publishers.

 

Bandura, A.,  & Barab,  P. G. (1971). Conditions governing nonreinforced imitation.

Developmental Psychology, 5(2), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031499

 

Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Aubusson, P. (2018). Computers & education  mobile 

 learning  for  Science  and  Mathematics  school  education :  A systematic review of empirical 

evidence. Computers & Education, 121, 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.006

 

Barma, S., & Daniel, S. (2017). Designing enhanced learning environments in Physics: An 

interdisciplinary collaborative approach producing an instrument for school success. Dlm. M. 

Romero, K. Sawchuk, J. Blat, S. Sayago, & H. Ouellet (Pnyt.), Game-Based Learning Across the 

Lifespan (ms. 91–113). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

 

Beltrán, B. A. G., López, L. G., & Ortíz, A. R. (2016). User-Centered design in Moodle redesign  

for  mobile  use.  Pistas  Educativas,  38(120),  1212–1224.  Diperoleh daripada 

http://www.itcelaya.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/pistas/article/view/609

 

Bloom,  B.  S.,  Krathwohl,  D.  R.,  &  Masia,  B.  B.  (1956).  Taxonomy  of  educational 

objectives: The classification of educational goals. Dlm. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain.        New  

      York:        David        McKay.        Diperoleh        daripada 

https://books.google.com.my/books?id=e1VtswEACAAJ

 

Bogdanovi?,  Z.,  Barac? ,  D.,  Jovanic? ,  B.,  Popovic? ,  S.,  &  Radenkovic? ,  B.  (2014). 

Evaluation  of  mobile  assessment  in  a  learning  management  system.  British Journal          

of          Educational          Technology,          45(2),          231–244.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12015

 

Borokhovski, E., Bernard, R. M., Tamim, R. M., & Schmid, R. F. (2018). Achievement and  attitudes  

in  technology-supported  postsecondary  education :  Complexity  of relationships through the lens 

of meta-analysis. Dlm. T. Bastiaens, J. Van Braak,

M.  Brown,  L.  Cantoni,  M.  Castro,  R.  Christensen,  G.  Davidson-Shivers,  K. DePryck, M. 

Ebner, M. Fominykh, C. Fulford, S. Hatzipanagos, G. Knezek, K. Kreijns, G. Marks, E. Sointu, E. 

Korsgaard Sorensen, J. Viteli, J. Voogt, P. Weber,

E.  Weippl  &  O.  Zawacki-Richter  (Pnyt.),  Proceedings  of  EdMedia:  World Conference on 

Educational Media and Technology (ms. 1994–2003). Amsterdam, Netherlands:  Association  for  the  

Advancement  of  Computing  in  Education (AACE). Diperoleh daripada 

https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/184439/.

 

Branch,  R.  M.  (2009).  Instructional  Design:  The  ADDIE  Approach.  New  York: Springer. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

 

Cai, S., Chiang, F. K., Sun, Y., Lin, C., & Lee, J. J. (2016). Applications of augmented 

reality-based natural interactive learning in magnetic field instruction. Interactive Learning      

  Environments,        25(6),        778–791.        https://doi.org/10.1080/

10494820.2016.1181094

 

Cano, E. M., Ruiz, J. G., & Garcia, I. A. (2013). Integrating a learning constructionist 

environment and the instructional design approach into the definition of a basic course  for  

embedded  systems  design.  Computer  Applications  in  Engineering Education, 23(1), 36–53. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21574

 

Cardinot, A., & Fairfield, J. A. (2019). Game-Based Learning to engage students with Physics and 

Astronomy using a board game. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 9(1), 42–57. 

https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.2019010104

 

Cepni, S., Tas, E., & Ko¨se, S. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted material on students   

cognitive   levels,   misconceptions   and   attitudes   towards   science. Computers     and     

Education,     46(2),     192–205.     https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2004.07.008

 

Chan, L. L., & Noraini Idris. (2017). Validity and reliability of the instrument using Exploratory  

Factor  Analysis  and  Cronbach’s  Alpha.  International  Journal  of Academic   Research   in   

Business   and   Social   Sciences,   7(10),   400–410. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i10/3387

 

Chandler,  P.,  &  Sweller,  J.  (1991).  Cognitive  Load  Theory  and  the  Format  of 

Instruction.  Cognition  and  Instruction,  8(4),  293–332.  https://doi.org/10.1207/ 

s1532690xci0804_2

 

Chang,  C.,  Chang,  C.  K.,  &  Shih,  J.  L.  (2016).  Motivational  strategies  in  a  mobile 

inquiry-based  language  learning  setting.  System,  59,  100–115.  https://doi.org/ 

10.1016/j.system.2016.04.013

 

Chang, C. Y., Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2017). Trends and research issues of mobile learning 

studies in nursing education: A review  of academic publications from 1971  to  2016.  Computers  

and  Education,  116,  28–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/

j.compedu.2017.09.001

 

Chang, H. Y., Hsu, Y. S., & Hung, J. Y. (2016). Adapting and customizing Web-based inquiry Science 

environments to promote Taiwanese students’ learning of Science. Dlm.  M.  H.  Chiu  (Pnyt.),  

Science  Education  research  and  practice  in  Asia: Challenges and opportunities. Singapore: 

Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981-10-0847-4_9

 

Chang,  M.  M.,  &  Lan,  S.  W.  (2019).  Exploring  undergraduate  EFL  students’ perceptions and 

experiences of a Moodle-based reciprocal teaching application. The       Journal       of       

Open,       Distance       and       e-Learning,       1–16. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1708298

 

Chou, Y. H., & Shyu, H. Y. (2017). Virtual Laboratory of the Magnetic Field due to a Current      

Element.      SITE      2017,      1484–1489.      Diperoleh      daripada 

http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/109911

 

Chua,  Y.  P.  (2006).  Asas  statistik  penyelidikan  buku  2.  Shah  Alam:  McGraw-Hill. 

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

 

Chua,  Y.  P.  (2014).  Ujian  Regresi,  Analisis  Faktor  dan  analisis  SEM.  Shah  Alam: 

McGrawHill Education.

 

Chung, C., Hwang, G., & Lai, C. (2018). A review of experimental mobile learning research  in  

2010-2016  based  on  the  activity  theory  framework.  Computers  & Education, 129, 1–13. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.010

 

Clemente,  F.  J.  G.,  Esquembre,  F.,  &  Wee,  L.  K.  (2017).  Deployment  of  physics 

simulation apps using Easy JavaScript simulations. Global Engineering Education Conference,         

  (EDUCON),           1093–1096.           https://doi.org/10.1109/ EDUCON.2017.7942985

 

Cobcroft, R., Towers, S., Smith, J., & Bruns, A. (2006). Mobile learning in review: Opportunities  

and  challenges  for  learners,  teachers,  and  institutions.  Dlm.  A. Brown  (Pnyt),  Learning  

on  the  Move:  Proceedings  of  the  online  learning  and teaching       conference       2006.   

    (ms.       21–30).       Diperoleh       daripada http://eprints.qut.edu.au

 

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (ed. ke- 8). New York: 

Routledge.

 

Covill, A. E. (2011). College students’ perceptions of the traditional lecture method.

College Student Journal, 45(1), 92+.

 

Crawford, J., Butler-Hunderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., & Lam, S. 

(2020). View of COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra- period digital pedagogy responses. 

Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, (1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7

 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative     

and     qualitative     research     (ed.     ke-4).     Boston:     Pearson.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

 

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education : A

systematic        review.        Computers        &        Education,        123,        53–64. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007

 

Crompton,  H.,  Burke,  D.,  Gregory,  K.  H.,  &  Gräbe,  C.  (2016).  The  use  of  mobile 

learning  in  Science:  A  systematic  review.  Journal  of  Science  Education  and Technology, 

25(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9597-x

 

Crouch,  C.  H.,  &  Heller,  K.  (2012).  Teaching  Physics  to  Life  Science  students  - 

Examining the role of biological context. Physics Education Research Conference 2011, 1413, 

159–162. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3680019

 

Dani  Asmadi  Ibrahim,  &  Kamisah  Osman.  (2011).  Kemahiran  berfikir  aras  tinggi, pengajaran  

tajuk  Model  Atom  dan  pencapaian  objektif  kursus  Kimia.  Seminar Majlis Dekan-Dekan 

Pendidikan IPTA, 105–122.

 

Darren, G., & Paul, M. (2010). Spss for Windows step by step : A simple guide and reference, 17.0 

update (ed. ke-10). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

 

Davidsson, M., Johansson, D., & Lindwall, K. (2012). Exploring the use of augmented reality  to  

support  Science  education  in  secondary  schools.  2012  IEEE  Seventh International  Conference 

 on  Wireless,  Mobile  and  Ubiquitous  Technology  in Education, 218–220. 

https://doi.org/10.1109/WMUTE.2012.52

 

Dbowska,  E.,  Girwidz,  R.,  Greczy?o,  T.,  Kohnle,  A.,  Mason,  B.,  Mathelitsch,  L., Melder,  

 T.,   Michelini,   M.,   Ruddock,   I.,   &   Silva,   J.   (2013).   Report   and recommendations 

on multimedia materials for teaching and learning Electricity and     Magnetism.     European     

Journal     of     Physics,     34(3),     L47–L54. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/34/3/L47

 

Delacre, M., Lakens, D., & Leys, C. (2017). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s   

t-Test   instead   of   student’s   t-Test.   International   Review   of   Social Psychology, 

30(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.82

 

Dewitt, D., Norlidah Alias, & Saedah Siraj. (2015). Collaborative learning: Interactive debates 

using Padlet in a higher education institution. International Educational Technology     Conference 

    (IETC     2015),     88–95.     https://doi.org/10.1177/

1461445615613178

 

Dewitt,  D.,  Saedah  Siraj,  &  Norlidah  Alias.  (2014).  Collaborative  mLearning :  A module  

for  learning  secondary  school  Science.  Educational  Technology  & Society,                

17(1),                89–101.                Diperoleh                daripada 

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.17.1.89

 

DeWitt,  J.,  Archer,  L.,  &  Moote,  J.  (2019).  15/16-year-old  students’  reasons  for 

choosing and not choosing Physics at A Level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics 

Education, 17, 1071–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-

9900-4

 

Dimopoulos, D. I., & Pantis, J. D. (2003). Knowledge and attitudes regarding sea turtles in  

elementary  students  on  Zakynthos,  Greece.  The  Journal  of  Environmental Education, 34(3), 

30–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960309603491

 

Dinçer,  S.,  &  Do?anay,  A.  (2017).  The  effects  of  multiple-pedagogical  agents  on 

learners’   academic   success,   motivation,   and   cognitive   load.   Computers   & Education, 

111, 74–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.005

 

Donnelly,  R.,  &  Fitzmaurice,  M.  (2005).  Designing  modules  for  learning.  Dlm.  G. O’Neill, 

S. Moore, & B. McMullin (Pnyt.), Emerging Issues in the practice of University learning and 

teaching. (ms. 99–110). Dublin: All Ireland Society for Higher Education (AISHE). 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-006-0193-6

 

Doolittle,  P.  E.  (1997).  Vygotsky’s  zone  of  proximal  development  as  a  theoretical 

foundation for cooperative learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 8(1), 83–103. 

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114500000799

 

Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology- enabled active learning affect 

undergraduate students’ understanding of Electromagnetism concepts? Journal of the       Learning   

    Sciences,       14(2),       243–279.       https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15327809jls1402_3

 

Douglas, K. A., Yale, M. S., Bennett, D. E., Haugan, M. P., & Bryan, L. A. (2014). Evaluation of 

Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Physical Review Special      Topics      -      

Physics      Education      Research,      10(2),      020128. 

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020128

 

Dwi, S. (2017). Mobile learning application development fostering high order thinking skills on 

Physics learning. International Conference on Education, Business and Management          

(ICEBM-2017),          102–107.          https://doi.org/10.15242/ HEAIG.H0117523

 

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (ed. ke-5). Englewood   

   Cliffs,      NJ:      Prentice      Hall.      https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 4405(73)90057-5

 

Engeström,  Y.  (1987).  Learning  by  expanding:  An  activity  theoretical  approach  to 

developmental  research  (ed.  ke-1).  Helsinki:  Orienta-Konsultit.  https://doi.org/ 

10.1016/j.intcom.2007.07.003

 

Erdil,  N.  O.,  Harichandran,  R.  S.,  Nocito-Gobel,  J.,  Li,  C.  Q.,  &  Carnasciali,  M.  I. 

(2017).  Impact  of  integrated  e-learning  modules  in  developing  an  entrepreneu mindset based 

on deployment at 25 institutions. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 

https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28467

 

Fairuz Aliaa Fadzil, & Siti Nur Diyana Mahmud. (2019). Pembelajaran & kualiti guru

STEM : Cabaran & inisiatif. Global Education: Perspectives, Innovations, Issues,

and Challenges, 3, 1–15.

 

Fatin Aliah Phang, Mohd Salleh Abu, Mohammad Bilal Ali, & Salmiza Salleh. (2014). Faktor penyumbang 

kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran Sains: Satu       analisis       sorotan       

tesis.       Sains       Humanika,       2(4),       63–71. 

https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n3.2

 

Fox, E., & Riconscente, M. (2008). Metacognition and self-regulation in James, Piaget, and     

Vygotsky.     Educational     Psychology      Review,     20(4),     373–389. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9079-2

 

Francis,  L.  J.,  &  Greer,  J.  E.  (2007).  Measuring  attitude  towards  Science  among 

secondary   school   students:   The   affective   domain.   Research   in   Science   & 

Technological                      Education,                      17(2),                      

219–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514990170207

 

Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (ed. ke-4).

New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

 

Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design

(ed. ke-4). Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

 

Gay, L. R., & Diehl, P. L. (1992). Research methods for business and management.

New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

 

Gee,  J.  P.  (2003).  What  video  games  have  to  teach  us  about  learning  and  literacy.

Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595

 

Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for  

non-statisticians.  International  Journal  of  Endocrinology  and  Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. 

https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505

 

Ghazali   Darusalam,   &   Sufean   Hussin.   (2016).   Metodologi   penyelidikan   dalam 

pendidikan:  Amalan  dan  analisis  kajian  (ed.  ke-2).  Kuala  Lumpur:  Penerbit Universiti 

Malaya. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

 

Gikas,  J.,  &  Grant,  M.  M.  (2013).  Mobile  computing  devices  in  higher  education: Student 

perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. Internet             and      

       Higher             Education,             19,             18–26. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002

 

Goldschmid, B., & Goldschmid, M. L. (1973). Modular instruction in higher education: A review. 

Higher Education, 2, 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162534

 

Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of 

Personality        Assessment,        68(3),        532–560.        https://doi.org/10.1207/ 

s15327752jpa6803_5

 

Grenier,  D.  P.  (2018).  The  relationship  between  mobile  learning  and  academic achievement  

 in   a   community   college   system   online   environment   (Thesis Kedoktoran).      Diperoleh 

     daripada      http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/

viewcontent.cgi?article=2731&context=doctoral

 

Guido,   R.   M.   D.   (2013).   Attitude   and   motivation   towards   learning   Physics. 

International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 2(11), 2087–2094. Diperoleh daripada 

http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.02293

 

Guisasola, J., Zuza, K., & Almudi, J. M. (2013). An analysis of how Electromagnetic Induction and 

Faraday’ s law are presented in general Physics textbooks, focusing on      learning      

difficulties.      European      Journal      of      Physics,      34(4). 

https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/34/4/1015

 

Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM Integration in middle  school  

Life  Science:  Student  learning  and  attitudes.  Journal  of  Science Education and Technology, 

25(4), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016- 9612-x

 

Hacieminoglu,  E.  (2016).  Elementary  school  students’  attitude  toward  science  and related 

variables. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(2), 35–52. 

https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2016.288a

 

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis       

(ed.       ke-7).       England:       Pearson       Education       Limited. 

https://doi.org/10.1038/259433b0

 

Hamidah   Yusof,   Jamal   Yunus,   &   Khalid   Musa.   (2014).   Kaedah   penyelidikan pengurusan 

pendidikan. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Hazimah Ashamuddin, Nurul Syafiqah Yap Abdullah, & Mazlina Mat Darus. (2020). Kesahan dan 

kebolehpercayaan soal selidik terhadap pembelajaran Fizik (STPF). Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan 

Guru, Jilid 15, 25–38.

 

Herrera,  F.  T.,  &  Soriano,  A.  T.  (2016).  The  Efficacy  of  the  strategic  intervention 

materials (SIM) to the achievement in Physics of a selected group of public school students  in  

Las  Nieves,  Agusan  del  Norte.  Annals  of  Studies  in  Science  and Humanities,                

2(2),                22–33.                Diperoleh                daripada 

http://journal.carsu.edu.ph/index.php/assh/article/view/84

 

Ho, H. N. J., & Liang, J. C. (2015). The relationships among scientific epistemic beliefs, 

conceptions of learning Science, and motivation of learning Science: A study of Taiwan high school 

students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(16), 2688–2707. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1100346

 

Hookway, G., Mehdi, Q., Hartley, T., & Bassey, N. (2013). Learning Physics through computer     

games.     Proceedings     of     CGAMES’2013     USA,     119–126. 

https://doi.org/10.1109/CGames.2013.6632617

 

Hudha,  M.  N.,  Aji,  S.  D.,  &  Huda,  C.  (2018).  E-Rubric:  Scientific  work  based  on 

Android for Experimental Physic. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and

Engineering, 288(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/288/1/012100

 

Hudiya Adzhar, Fariza Khalid, & Aidah Abdul Karim. (2017). Penggunaan Massive Open   Online   

Course   (   MOOC   )   sebagai   kaedah   pembelajaran   baharu. Pembelajaran   Abad   Ke-21:   

Trend   integrasi   teknologi,   179–188.   Diperoleh daripada        

https://www.academia.edu/31631536/Penggunaan_Massive_Open_ 

Online_Course_MOOC_sebagai_Kaedah_Pembelajaran_Baharu

 

Jamal  Nordin  Yunus,  Marinah  Awang,  &  Mahaliza  Mansor.  (2019).  Tingkahlaku kepimpinan 

transformasi di sekolah rendah luar bandar. EDUCATUM Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 15–23. 

https://doi.org/10.37134/ejoss.vol5no1.3

 

Jamali, S. M., Ahmad Nurulazam Md Zain, Mohd Ali Samsudin, & Ebrahim, N. A. (2017). Self-efficacy, 

scientific reasoning, and learning achievement in the STEM project-based learning literature. The 

Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 2(2), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0b013e31826fc1e4

 

Kalogiannakis, M., Ampartzaki, M., Papadakis, S., & and Skaraki, E. (2018). Teaching natural  

Science  concepts  to  young  children  with  mobile  devices  and  hands-on activities . A case 

study. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 9(2), 171–183. 

https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTCS.2018.090965

 

Kamaruddin  Ilias, & Che Aleha Ladin. (2018). Pengetahuan dan kesediaan revolusi industri 4.0 dalam 

kalangan pelajar  Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Ipoh. O- JIE : Online Journal of Islamic 

Education, 6(2), 18–26. https://ojie.um.edu.my/ article/view/14787

 

Kampeza, M., & Ravanis, K. (2009). Transforming the representations of preschool- age  children  

regarding  geophysical  entities  and  physical  geography.  Review  of Science,       Mathematics  

     and       ICT       Education,       3(1),       141–158. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.125

 

Karacop, A. (2017). The effects of using jigsaw method based on cooperative learning model  in  the 

 undergraduate  Science  laboratory  practices.  Universal  Journal  of Educational Research, 5(3), 

420–434. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050314

 

Keller, C. J., Finkelstein, N. D., Perkins, K. K., & Pollock, S. J. (2006). Assessing the 

effectiveness   of   a   computer   simulation   in   conjunction   with   tutorials   in 

introductory  Physics  in  undergraduate  Physics  recitations.  Physics  Education Research 

Conference 2005, 818(1), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2177035

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025   

(Pendidikan   Prasekolah   hingga   Lepas   Menengah).   Putrajaya: Pengarang.   Diperoleh   

daripada   https://www.moe.gov.my/en/dasarmenu/pelan- pembangunan-pendidikan-2013-2025

 

Kementerian   Pendidikan   Malaysia.   (2018a).   Dokumen   Standard   Kurikulum   dan Pentaksiran 

Fizik Tingkatan 4 dan 5. Putrajaya: Pengarang. Diperoleh daripada

https://anyflip.com/qbqoq/iogk/

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018b). Kad Laporan Pencapaian Malaysia dalam PISA          2018. 

         Putrajaya:          Pengarang.          Diperoleh          daripada 

https://www.moe.gov.my/en/

pemberitahuan/announcement/pencapaian-malaysia-dalam-pisa-2018

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018c). Perangkaan Pendidikan Malaysia 2018. Putrajaya:   

Pengarang.   Diperoleh   daripada   https://www.moe.gov.my/en/muat- 

turun/laporan-dan-statistik/perangkaan-pendidikan

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Ringkasan Eksekutif Pelan Transformasi ICT   Kementerian   

Pendidikan   Malaysia   2019-2023.   Putrajaya:   Pengarang. Diperoleh   daripada   

https://www.mohe.gov.my/muat-turun/warga/manual-dan- 

garis-panduan-1/ict/seminar-transformasi-ict-kpm/559-ringkasan-eksekutif- 

pelan-transformasi-ict-kementerian-pendidikan-malaysia-2019- 2023?format=html

 

Kementerian   Pendidikan   Tinggi   Malaysia.   (2018).   Framing   Malaysian   Higher Education 

4.0 : Future-Proof Talents (ed. ke-1). Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. Diperoleh daripada 

http://jpt.mohe.gov.my/portal/penerbitan/framing-malaysian- 

higher-education-4-0-future-proof-talent

 

Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A. K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse  

intervention  on  teachers’  practice  and  students’  motivation  to  learn Mathematics     and    

 Science.     Learning     and     Instruction,     35,     94–103. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.003

 

Kohlmyer, M. A., Caballero, M. D., Catrambone, R., Chabay, R. W., Ding, L., Haugan,

M. P., Marr, M. J., Sherwood, B. A., & Schatz, M. F. (2009). Tale of two curricula : The  

performance  of  2000  students  in  introductory  Electromagnetism.  Physical Review     Special   

  Topics-Physics     Education     Research,     5(2),     020105. 

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.020105

 

Kok, K. H. (2017). Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan modul pembelajaran kendiri   berasaskan   

multimedia   bagi   Topik   Cahaya   Fizik   tingkatan   empat. (Disertasi Kedoktoran). Tanjong 

Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodologu methods and techniques (Second Revised Edition). New 

Delhi: New Age International (P) Limited.

 

Krejcie,  R.  V.,  &  Morgan,  D.  W.  (1970).  Determining  sample  size  for  research 

activities.    Educational    and    Psychological    Measurement,    30,    607–610. 

https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

 

Lawshe,   C.   H.   (1975).   A   quantitative   approach   to   content   validity.  Personnel 

Psychology, 28, 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

 

Layla  Hasan.  (2018).  Usability  problems  on  desktop  and  mobile  interfaces  of  the Moodle 

Learning Management System (LMS). 2018 International Conference on E-Business          and          

 Applications          (ICEBA          2018),          69–73.

https://doi.org/10.1145/3194188.3194192

 

Lee,  J.  (2016).  Attitude  toward  school  does  not  predict  academic  achievement.

Learning            and            Individual            Differences,            52,            

1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.009

 

Lee, T. T., & Kamisah Osman. (2012). Interactive multimedia module in the learning of 

Electrochemistry: Effects on students’ understanding and motivation. Procedia

-   Social   and   Behavioral   Sciences,   46,   1323–1327.   https://doi.org/10.1016

/j.sbspro.2012.05.295

 

Lee, Y. C., Lau, K., & Wing, V. Y. Y. (2016). Blended learning for building student- teachers’  

capacity  to  learn  and  teach  science-related  interdisciplinary  subjects. Asian     

Association     of     Open     Universities     Journal,     11(2),     166–181. 

https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-09-2016-0029

 

Lemmer, M., Kriek, J., & Erasmus, B. (2018). Analysis of students’ conceptions of basic  Magnetism  

from  a  complex  systems  perspective.  Research  in  Science Education, 50, 375–392. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9693-z

 

Leow, F. T., & Neo, M. (2014). Interactive multimedia learning: Innovating classroom education in a 

Malaysian university. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 99–110. 

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1022913.pdf

 

Li,  F.,  Bao,  Y.,  Wang,  D.,  Wang,  W.,  &  Niu,  L.  (2016).  Smartphones  for  sensing.

Science Bulletin, 61(3), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0954-1

 

Li, J., & Singh, C. (2016). Developing and validating a conceptual survey to assess introductory 

Physics students’ understanding of Magnetism. European Journal of Physics, 38(2). 

https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/38/2/025702

 

Li, J., & Singh, C. (2012). Developing a Magnetism conceptual survey and assessing gender  

differences  in  student  understanding  of  Magnetism.  Physics  Education Research    Conference  

  2011,    43–46.    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/

1.3679989

 

Lilia  Halim,  Yong,  T.  K.,  &  Tamby  Subahan  Mohd  Meerah.  (2014).  Overcoming students’  

misconceptions  on  Forces  in  equilibrium:  An  action  research  study. Creative    Education,   

 5(11),    1032–1042.    https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.4236/ ce.2014.511117

 

Limongelli, C., Lombardi, M., Marani, A., Sciarrone, F., & Temperini, M. (2016). A recommendation  

module  to  help  teachers  build  courses  through  the  Moodle Learning  Management  System.  New 

 Review  of  Hypermedia  and  Multimedia, 22(1–2), 58–82. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2015.1077277

 

Lin, C. H., Huang, S. H., Shih, J. L., Covaci, A., & Ghinea, G. (2017). Game-based learning 

effectiveness and motivation study between competitive and cooperative modes.   2017   IEEE   17th  

 International   Conference   on   Advanced   Learning

Technologies (ICALT), 1, 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2017.34

 

Lok, W. F. (2012). Concerns of online learning portal among Science lecturers in Perak 

Matriculation College. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Peringkat Kebangsaan Kali   Ke-7   Program   

Matrikulasi   Kementerian   Pelajaran   Malaysia,   1–15. Diperoleh   daripada   

https://www.academia.edu/13519390/Concerns_of_online_ 

learning_portal_among_science_lecturers_in_Perak_Matriculation_College

 

López, J. A., Collazos, C. A., Velas, F. L. G., & Moreira, F. (2018). Using pervasive games as 

learning tools in educational contexts: a systematic review. International Journal     of     

Learning     Technology,     13(2),     93.     https://doi.org/10.1504/ ijlt.2018.092094

 

Lourenço,  O.  (2012).  Piaget  and  Vygotsky:  Many  resemblances,  and  a  crucial difference.    

    New        Ideas        in        Psychology,        30(3),        281–295. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.006

 

Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues.     

Journal     of     Industrial     Information     Integration,     6,     1–10. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005

 

Lynn,  M.  R.  (1986).  Determination  and  quantification  of  content  validity.  Nursing 

Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

 

Magana, A. J., Sanchez, K. L., Shaikh, U. A. S., Jones, M. G., & Tan, H. Z. (2017). Exploring 

multimedia principles for supporting conceptual learning of electricity and magnetism with 

visuohaptic simulations. Computers in Education Journal, 8(2),         8–23.         Diperoleh      

   daripada         http://www.hpcg.purdue.edu/ papers/Magana17CEJ.pdf

 

Maghfiroh,  L.,  Subchan,  W.,  &  Iqbal,  M.  (2017).  Problem  based  learning  through Moodle 

for increasing self regulated learning students (Goal setting and planing). The  International  

Journal  of  Social  Sciences  and  Humanities  Invention,  4(8). 

https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v4i8.32

 

Mahjabeen,  W.,  Alam,  S.,  Hassan,  U.,  Zafar,  T.,  Butt,  R.,  Konain,  S.,  &  Rizvi,  M. 

(2017). Difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency in multiple choice   

questions.   Annals   of   PIMS,   13(4),   310–315.   Diperoleh   daripada 

https://apims.net/index.php/apims/article/view/9

 

Maria, M., Faaizah Shahbodin, & Naim Che Pee. (2018). Malaysian higher education system   towards   

industry   4.0   -   Current   trends   overview.   3rd   International Conference   on   Applied   

Science   and   Technology   (ICAST’18),   1,   020081. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055483

 

Martin, F., & Ertzberger, J. (2013). Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study  on  the  

use  of  mobile  technology.  Computers  and  Education,  68,  76–85. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.021

 

Maruši,  M.,  &  Sliško,  J.  (2012).  Influence  of  three  different  methods  of  teaching 

Physics on the gain in students’ development of reasoning. International Journal of    Science    

Education,    2(34),    301–206.    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.

2011.582522

 

Mayer,  R.  E.  (1997).  Multimedia  learning:  Are  we  asking  the  right  questions? Educational 

 Psychologist,  32(1),  1–19.  https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15326985ep3201_1

Mayer,  R.  E.  (2005).  The  Cambridge  handbook  of  multimedia  learning. Cambridge University 

Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819

 

Mayer,  R.  E.,  &  Moreno,  R.  (2002).  Animation  as  an  aid  to  multimedia  learning. 

Educational     Psychology     Review,     14,     87–99.     https://doi.org/10.1023/ 

A:1013184611077

 

McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching  

in  a  digital  age:  How  educators  use  technology  to  improve  student learning.  Journal  of  

Research  on  Technology  in  Education,  48(3),  194–211. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856

 

Meerbaum-Salant, O., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. (Moti). (2013). Learning computer science  concepts  

with  Scratch.  Computer  Science  Education,  23(3),  239–264. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2013.832022

 

Mimi Mohaffyza Mohamad, Nor Lisa Sulaiman, Lai, C. S., & Kahirol Mohd Salleh. (2015). Measuring the 

validity and reliability of research instruments. Procedia - Social    and    Behavioral    

Sciences,    204,    164–171.    https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2015.08.129

 

Miner, A., Mallow, J., Theeke, L., & Barnes, E. (2015). Using Gagne’s 9 events of instruction   to  

 enhance    student   performance    and   course    evaluations   in undergraduate      nursing    

  course.      Nurse      Educator,      40(3),      152–154. 

https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000138

 

Moeller,  J.,  Salmela-aro,  K.,  Lavonen,  J.,  &  Schneider,  B.  (2015).  Does  anxiety  in 

Science classrooms impair Math and Science motivation ? - Gender differences beyond the mean level. 

International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2),       229–254.       Diperoleh       

daripada       http://genderandset.open.ac.uk/ index.php/genderandset/article/view/398

 

Mohamad Siri Muslimin, Norazah Mohd Nordin, Ahmad Zamri Mansor, & Melor Md Yunus. (2017). The 

design and development of Mobieko: A mobile educational app for Microeconomics module. Malaysian 

Journal of Learning and Instruction, (ed. Khas), 221–255. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli.2017.7804

 

Mohamed Nor Azhari Azman, Aisyah Mohamad Sharif, Balamuralithara Balakrishnan, Mohd Ikhwan Hadi 

Yaacob, Sadiah Baharom, Haniza Hanim Mohd Zain, Fadhil Harfiez  Abdul  Muthalib,  &  Nuramalina  

Samar.  (2018).  Retooling  Science teaching on stability topic for STEM education : Malaysian case 

study. Journal of Engineering  Science  and  Technology,  13(10),  3116–3128.  Diperoleh  daripada

http://www.myjurnal.my/public/article-view.php?id=128428

 

Mohammad Hafiz Zaini, & Saedah Siraj. (2016). Kebolehlaksanaan penggunaan Kod Quick Response 

terhadap pembelajaran herba kesihatan dalam kalangan pelajar institut  pengajian  tinggi  di  

Malaysia.  Jurnal  Kurikulum  &  Pengajaran  Asia Pasifik,         4(2),         20–30.         

Diperoleh         daripada         https://juku.um. edu.my/article/view/8196

 

Mohd.   Jasmy   Abd   Rahman,   Mohd   Arif   Ismail,   &   Muhammad   Nasir.   (2014). Development 

 and  evaluation  of  the  effectiveness  of  computer-assisted  physics instruction.        

International        Education        Studies,        7(13),        14–22. 

https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p14

 

Mohd Afifi Bahurudin Setambah. (2017). Pembangunan dan pengujian modul kaedah pengajaran berasaskan 

adventure terhadap pencapaian statistik asas, kemahiran (Tesis   Kedoktoran).   Tanjong   Malim:   

Universiti   Pendidikan   Sultan   Idris. Diperoleh daripada 

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=4178

 

Mohd Afifi Bahurudin Setambah, Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin, Mazlini Adnan, & Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad. 

(2017). Adventure based learning module: Content validity and reliability process. International 

Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 615–623. 

https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2669

 

Mohd Majid Konting. (2009). Kaedah penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan 

Pustaka.

 

Mohd Noor Badlilshah Abdul Kadir, Mohd Mustamam Abdul Karim, & Nurulhuda Abd.  Rahman.  (2016).  

Sikap  terhadap  pembelajaran  Fizik  dan  hubungannya dengan  pencapaian  dalam  kalangan  pelajar 

 Sains.  Jurnal  Personalia  Pelajar, 19(1), 31–51. Diperoleh daripada 

http://journalarticle.ukm.my/10879/

 

Morris, N. P., Lambe, J., Ciccone, J., & Swinnerton, B. (2016). Mobile technology: students  

perceived  benefits  of  apps  for  learning  Neuroanatomy.  Journal  of Computer Assisted 

Learning, 32(5), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12144

 

Mueanploy, W. (2016). A study: Effect of students peer assisted learning on Magnetic Field   

achievement.   Journal   of   Physics:   Conference   Series,   710,   012025. 

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/710/1/012025

 

Muhamad   Shakir   Saad,   Sabariah   Sharif,   &   Muralindran   Mariappan.   (2018). Pembangunan 

modul robot permainan Topik Respirasi Sel menggunakan model ADDIE.   Jurnal   Pendidikan   Sains   

&   Matematik   Malaysia,   8(1),   55–73. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol8.1.5.2018

 

Muhammad Asri Madmor, Tee, T. K., Mohamed Nor Azhari Azman, Ridzwan Che Rus, Zaliza Hanapi, Jailani 

Md Yunos, Yee, M. H., & Mimi Mohaffyza Mohamad. (2016).  Modul  Peta  Minda  Buzan  dan  pencapaian 

 pelajar  pendidikan  asas vokasional di Malaysia: Satu kajian keberkesanan. Journal of Society and 

Space, 12(3),    139–144.    Diperoleh    daripada    https://ejournal.ukm.my/gmjss/article/

view/17646

 

Mukhid,  A.  (2008).  Strategi  self-regulated  learning  (Perspektif  teoritik).  TADRIS: Jurnal   

 Pendidikan    Islam,    3(2).    https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.19105/ tjpi.v3i2.239

 

Mukhid,  A.  (2009).  Self-efficacy  (Perspektif  teori  kognitif  sosial  dan  implikasinya 

terhadap    pendidikan).    TADRIS:    Jurnal    Pendidikan    Islam,    4(1),    16–23. 

https://doi.org/10.1109/HiPINEB.2018.00011

 

Nikou,  S.  A.,  &  Economides,  A.  A.  (2018).  Mobile-based  assessment:  A  literature review 

of publications in major referred journals from 2009 to 2018. Computers and Education, 125, 

101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.006

 

Noraffandy Yahaya, & Nur Fazila Salleh. (2011). Modul pembelajaran kendiri (MPK) bagi  perisian  

Microsoft  Visual  Basic  6.0.  Journal  of  Science  &  Mathematics Education, 1–8. Diperoleh 

daripada http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11984/

 

Norsaliza Sabu. (2018).  The effect of using interactive multimedia courseware with pedagogical  

agent  in  learning  nutrition  towards  higher  order  thinking  skills. International Journal of 

Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(2), 623–635. 

https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i2/3971

 

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (ed. ke-2). New York: Mc-Graw Hill. 

 

Nur’Ainiza Nuruddin, & Mordiah Morshidi. (2017). Meningkatkan penguasaan Topik

Keelektrikan  dan  Kemagnetan  pelajar  kolej  matrikulasi  melalui  pendekatan Conceptual   

Problem   Solving-Principle   Justification   Plan   (CPS-PJP).   Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan 

Guru, 12, 74–89.

 

Nurshamela  Saim,  Marlina  Ali,  &  Nor  Hasniza  Ibrahim.  (2014).  Proses  pembinaan modul 

Pro-Mc Physics : Fasa  analisis dan  reka  bentuk bagi model reka  bentuk pengajaran ADDIE. 

International Education Postgraduate Seminar (IEPS) 2015. Diperoleh daripada 

http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62108/

 

Nurul  Nadirah  Mohd  Kasim,  &  Fariza  Khalid.  (2016).  Choosing  the  right  learning 

management  system  (LMS)  for  the  higher  education  institution  context:  A systematic review. 

International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), 55–61. 

https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644

 

Nurul Syafiqah Yap Abdullah, Nor Shaida Md Saufi, & Mohd Ikhwan Hadi Yaacob. (2018).   

Microcomputer-Based   Laboratory   (MBI)   system   with   automated measuring approach for basic 

Electronics. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 10(3S), 87–96. Diperoleh daripada 

https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jfas/ article/view/171484

 

Nurulhuda Abdul Rahman, Noor Azman Razalee, Razak Abd Samad Yahya, & Ong,

E. T. (2011). The development and validation of learning attitudes about Physics (LAAP) inventory. 

Jurnal Sains Dan Matematik, 3(1), 39–49. Diperoleh daripada

https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JSML/article/view/376

 

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards Science: A review of the  

literature  and  its  implications.  International  Journal  of  Science  Education, 25(9), 

1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

 

Padmanaban  Madawan,  Ruhizan  Muhammad  Yasin,  &  Mohd  Isa  Hamzah.  (2017). Pengetahuan, sikap 

dan kesediaan pelajar kolej matrikulasi terhadap kemahiran berfikir  aras  tinggi  (KBAT)  dalam  

pembelajaran.  Seminar  on  Transdisiplin Education     (STEd2017),     541–547.     Diperoleh     

daripada     https://sted18. wordpress.com/prosiding-sted-2017/proceeding/

 

Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual (ed. ke-3). Wales:Allen & Unwin.

 

Patil,  R.,  Palve,  S.,  Vell,  K.,  &  Boratne,  A.  (2016).  Evaluation  of  multiple  choice 

questions by item analysis in a medical college at Pondicherry, India. International Journal   of   

Community   Medicine   and   Public   Health,   3(6),   1612–1616. 

https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20161638

 

Perdana, F. A., Sarwanto, Sukarmin, & Sujadi, I. (2017). Development of E-Module combining  Science 

 process  skills  and  dynamics  motion  material  to  increasing critical thinking skills and 

improve student learning motivation senior high school. International Journal of Science and 

Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v1i1.5112

 

Petrovic,  N.,  Jeremic,  V.,  Cirovic,  M.,  Radojicic,  Z.,  &  Milenkovic,  N.  (2014). Facebook 

Versus Moodle in Practice. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(2), 117–125. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.896581

 

Pieper, F. C., & Serrano, A. (2016). The ‘state of art’ of the research on Magnetic Field teaching 

: A review of Physics education literature between 1995 and 2015. Acta Scientiae,  18(3).  

Diperoleh  daripada  http://www.periodicos.ulbra.br/index.php/ acta/article/view/2327/2054

 

Pintrich,  P.  R.  (1995).  Understanding  self-regulated  learning  what  is  self-regulated 

learning?     New     directions     for     teaching     and     learning,     63,     3–12. 

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219956304

 

Plotz, T. (2017). Students’ conceptions of radiation and what to do about them. Physics Education, 

52(1), 014004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/52/1/014004

 

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being 

reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489–497. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

 

Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrovi?, V. M., & Jovanovi?, K. 

(2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and    engineering:    A    

review.    Computers    and    Education,    95,    309–327.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002

 

Prapulla, S. B., Shetty, J., Kulkarni, V. A., Subramanya, K. N., Uma, B. V, Kumar, P., &  Shobha,  

G.  (2020).  Design  and  analysis  of  an  online  course  using  Moodle platform. Journal of 

Engineering Education Transformations, 33(ed. Khas), 270– 274. 

https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i0/150158

 

Prawat,   R.   S.   (1996).   Constructivisms,   modern   and   postmodem.   Educational 

Psychologist, 31(3–4), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653268

 

Pujol, J., Blanco-Hinojo, L., Martínez-Vilavella, G., Canu-Martín, L., Pujol, A., Pérez- Sola,  V., 

 &  Deus,  J.  (2019).  Brain  activity  during  traditional  textbook  and audiovisual-3D       

learning.       Brain       and       Behavior,       9(10),       1–13. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1427

 

Rafiza Abdul Razak, & Maryam Abdul Rahman. (2013). Pembinaan media pengajaran berasaskan multimedia 

di kalangan guru ICTL. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia    Pasifik,    1(2),    20–31.    

Diperoleh    daripada    https://juku.um.edu.my/ article/view/7952

 

Reibstein,  D.  J.,  &  Lovelock,  C.  H.  (1980).  The  direction  of  causality  between 

perceptions, affect, and behavior: An application to travel behavior. Journal of Consumer Research. 

https://doi.org/10.1086/208780

 

Rochadel,  W.,  Da  Silva,  S.  P.,  Da  Silva,  J.  B.,  Luz,  T.  D.,  &  Alves,  G.  R.  (2012). 

Utilization   of   remote   experimentation   in   mobile   devices   for   education. 

International      Journal      of      Interactive      Mobile      Technologies,      6(3). 

https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2012.6201112

 

Rozana  Sani.  (2019,  Mei  1).  Preparing  job-ready  and  future-proof  graduates.  New Straits   

   Times.      Diperoleh      daripada      https://www.nst.com.my/education/ 

2019/05/484522/preparing-job-ready-and-future-proof-graduates

 

Ruzaini  Hisyam  Daud.  (2017).  Pembangunan  dan  penilaian  modul  pengajaran  dan pembelajaran 

berasaskan multimedia Subjek Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi sekolah rendah  (Tesis  Sarjana).  Tanjong  

Malim  :  Universiti  Pendidikan  Sultan  Idris. Diperoleh daripada http://ir.upsi.edu.my/3371/

 

Saedah  Siraj.  (2004).  Pembelajaran  mobile  dalam  kurikulum  masa  depan.  Masalah Pendidikan, 

27, 128–142.

 

Saefullah,   A.,   Siahaan,   P.,   &   Sari,   I.   M.   (2017).   The   correlation   of   

learning independence  attitudes  and  student’s  learning  achievement  on  Physics  learning 

based-portfolio.   Jurnal   Penelitian   Dan   Pembelajaran   IPA,   3(1),   74–83. 

https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v3i1.1741

 

Sa?lam, M. (2010). Students’ performance awareness, motivational orientations and learning  

strategies  in  a  problem-based  electromagnetism  course.  Asia-Pacific Forum   on   Science   

Learning   and   Teaching,   11(1).   Diperoleh   daripada

https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/v11_issue1/saglam/index.htm

 

Saifolrudin Khalid Mahzan, & Mohamad Khairi Othman. (2019). Pembangunan sistem prototaip  

E-Pendidikan  pondok  di  Kedah.  International  Journal  of  Education, Psychology      and      

Counseling,      4(26),      1–26.      Diperoleh      daripada 

http://www.myjurnal.my/public/article-view.php?id=141998

 

Salim, B. (2012). An application of UTAUT Model for acceptance of social media in Egypt: A 

Statistical Study. International Journal of Information Science, 2(6), 92– 105. 

https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijis.20120206.05

 

Sani, R. A., & Malau, T. (2017). The effect of problem based learning (PBL) model and self 

regulated learning (SRL) toward Physics problem solving ability (PSA) of students at senior high 

school. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 279–283. 

https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-3-8

 

Saregar, A., Zubaedi, Z., Parmin, P., Jamaludin, W., & Septiani, R. (2019). Feasibility test of 

mobile learning with Schoology: Efforts to foster the students’ learning interest   on   Magnetism. 

  Journal   of   Physics:   Conference   Series,   1155(1). 

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012060

 

Sari, D. P., & Madlazim, M. (2015). Computer simulation in Mechanics teaching and learning: a  case 

 study on students’ understanding of Force  and Motion.  Jurnal Penelitian         Fisika         

Dan         Aplikasinya         (JPFA),         5(2),         33.

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v5n2.p33-43

 

Sarrab, M., Hafedh, A. S., & Bader, A. M. (2015). System quality characteristics for selecting  

mobile  learning  applications.  Turkish  Online  Journal  of  Distance Education, 16(4), 18–28. 

https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092872

 

Savelsbergh, Elwin R., Prins, G. T., Rietbergen, C., Fechner, S., Vaessen, B. E., Draijer,

J.  M.,  &  Bakker,  A.  (2016).  Effects  of  innovative  science  and  mathematics teaching on 

student attitudes and achievement: A meta-analytic study. Educational Research Review, 19(19), 

158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.003

 

Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: 

Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 

111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8

 

Shah,  I.,  &  Khan,  M.  (2015).  Impact  of  multimedia-aided  teaching  on  students’ academic  

achievement  and  attitude  at  elementary  level.  US-China  Education Review A, 5(5), 349–360. 

https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2015.05.006

 

Shaharom   Noordin.   (1994).   Penghasilan   dan   penilaian   keberkesanan   modul pengajaran 

kendiri Fizik di kalangan pelajar berbeza kebolehan dan jantina pada peringkat tingkatan empat 

(Tesis Kedoktoran). Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Shaharudddin   Md   Salleh.   (2008).   Pembangunan   modul   pembelajaran   kendiri 

Keelektromagnetan,  Fizik  tingkatan  lima  berasaskan  pendekatan  konseptual melalui visual 

(Tesis Kedoktoran). Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.utm.my/11853/

 

Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. Dlm.  R.  

Andrews  and  C.  Haythornthwaite  (Pnyt.),  The  Sage  Handbook  of Elearning Research (ms. 

221–247). Sage publications.

 

Sidek  Mohd  Noah,  &  Jamaluddin  Ahmad.  (2005).  Pembinaan  modul:  Bagaimana membina modul 

latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Singh,  C.  (2008).  Interactive  learning  tutorials  on  quantum  mechanics.  American Journal of 

Physics, 76(4), 400–405. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2837812

 

Siti Adilah Sabarudin, Sarani Zakaria, & Kamisah Osman. (2020). Measuring current attitude   

towards   Science   of   matriculation   students   involved   in   innovation competition through 

project-based learning in Malaysia. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 3(1)(2), 1–6. 

https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.jssh.2019.2.1

 

Siti  Halijah  Ngadiman,  &  Mohd  Faizal  Jamaludin.  (2018).  Hubungan  di  antara kemahiran 

kerja berpasukan dan kemahiran komunikasi dalam kalangan pelajar semesta  akhir  Politeknik.  

International  Journal  of  Education,  Psychology  and Counseling, 3(19), 1–18. Diperoleh daripada 

https://ssrn.com/abstract=3277360

 

Siti Nor Aisah Moktar, Zaliza Hanapi, Tee, T. K., Suriani Mohamed, & Ridzwan Che Rus. (2018). 

Kesediaan,  penerimaan dan pengoperasian  guru Reka Bentuk dan Teknologi   terhadap   amalan   

dalam   pentaksiran   berasaskan   sekolah.   Sains Humanika, 10(3–3), 89–94. 

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v10n3-3.1520

 

Siti Rohaida Hashim. (2017). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan modul pengajaran dan pembelajaran  tajuk  

jatuh  bebas  dan  gerakan  luncuran  dan  keberkesanannya terhadap  pencapaian  pelajar  

(Disertasi  Sarjana).  Tanjong  Malim:  Universiti Pendidikan   Sultan   Idris.   Diperoleh   

daripada   https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg. php?det=4215

 

Siti  Zaharah  Alias,  Mohd  Nasir  Selamat,  Khadijah  Alavi,  &  Kadir  Arifin.  (2018). Industry 

 4.0:  A  systematic  review  in  Technical  and  Vocational  education  and training.    Jurnal    

Psikologi    Malaysia,    32(4),    66–74.    Diperoleh    daripada 

http://spaj.ukm.my/ppppm/jpm/article/view/437

 

Sreelakshmi, R., McLain, M., Rajeshwaran, A., Rao, B., Jayakrishnan, R., & Bijlani,

K. (2015). Gamification to enhance learning using Gagne’ s learning model. 2015 6th  International  

Conference  on  Computing,  Communication  and  Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 1–6. 

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCNT.2015.7395197

 

Stemler,  L.  (1997).  Educational  characteristics  of  multimedia:  a  literature  review. 

Journal      of      Educational      Multimedia      and      Hypermedia,      6(3–4). 

https://doi.org/10.5555/264828.264833

 

Subashini  Annamalai.  (2014).  Implementing  ARCS  model  to  design  a  motivating multimedia     

E-Book     for     Polytechnic     ESL     Classroom.     8(8),     57–60.

https://journal.utem.edu.my/index.php/jtec/article/view/1319

 

Suhanna Zainudin, Lilia Halim, & Zanaton Ikhsan. (2015). How 60 : 40 policy affect the development 

of Science curriculum in Malaysia. Proceeding: 7th International Seminar on Regional Education, 3, 

1396–1405.

 

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (ed. ke-5). Allyn & 

Bacon/Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.1037/022267

 

Tan, E. L., & Heh, D. Y. (2018). Teaching and learning Electromagnetic polarization using mobile 

devices.  IEEE Antennas and  Propagation Magazine, 60(4), 112– 121. 

https://doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2018.2839959

 

Tan,  F.  D.  H.,  Whipp,  P.  R.,  Gagné,  M.,  & Van  Quaquebeke,  N.  (2018).  Students’ 

perception of teachers’ two-way feedback interactions that impact learning. Social Psychology  of  

Education,  22(1),  169–187.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-

9473-7

 

Techakosit, S., & Nilsook, P. (2015). Using augmented reality for teaching Physics.

International E-Learning Conference 2015, Thailand Cyber University.

 

Testa, I., Capasso, G., Colantonio, A., Galano, S., Marzoli, I., Scotti di Uccio, U., Trani, F.,  & 

 Zappia,  A.  (2018).  Development  and  validation  of  a  university  students’ progression in 

learning Quantum Mechanics through Exploratory Factor Analysis and  Rasch  Analysis.  International 

 Journal  of  Science  Education,  1464–5289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1556414

 

Treagust,  D.  F.,  &  Duit,  R.  (2009).  Multiple  Perspectives  of  Conceptual  Change  in 

Science   and   the   Challenges   Ahead.   Journal   of   Science   and   Mathematics Education in 

Southeast Asia, 32(2), 89–104. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ910936

 

Tuada,  R.  N.,  Kuswanto,  H.,  Saputra,  A.  T.,  &  Aji,  S.  H.  (2020).  Physics  mobile 

learning  with  scaffolding  approach  in  Simple  Harmonic  Motion  to  improve student learning 

independence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1), 0–8. 

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012043

 

Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure 

students’ motivation towards Science learning. International Journal of Science                     

    Education,                         27(6),                         639–654. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323737

 

Tural,  G.,  &  Tarakç?,  D.  (2017).  Effects  of  physical  models  and  simulations  to 

understand  daily  life  applications  of  Electromagnetic  Induction.  Research  in Science        

 and         Technological         Education,         35(3),         292–307. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1295370

 

Uvathi Mariappan, Arsaythamby Veloo, & Kanageswari Suppiah Shanmugam. (2018). Pembinaan   dan   

pengesahan   instrumen   kemahiran   insaniah   bagi   Subjek Perakaunan di matrikulasi. Jurnal 

Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 6(4),

29–39. Diperoleh daripada https://juku.um.edu.my/article/view/15769

 

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development  of  

children.  Dlm.  Mind  and  Society:  The  Development  of  Higher Psychological Processes  (ms. 

79–91).

 

Wan Faizal Ismayatim. (2019, September 27). Kerajaan Risau Penurunan Pelajar Pilih Aliran        

STEM.        Berita        Harian        Online.        Diperoleh        daripada 

https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2019/09/611487/kerajaan-risau- 

penurunan-pelajar-pilih-aliran-stem

 

Wang, J. Y., Wu, H. K., & Hsu, Y. S. (2017). Using mobile applications for learning: Effects of 

simulation design, visual-motor integration, and spatial ability on high school students’ 

conceptual understanding. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 103–113. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.032

 

Wang,  J.,  Zahra  Hazari,  Cass,  C.,  &  Lock,  R.  (2018).  Episodic  memories  and  the 

longitudinal impact of high school physics on female students’ physics identity. International      

Journal      of      Science      Education,      40(13),      1543–1566. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1486522

 

Warliani, R., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2017).  Implementation of 7e learning cycle model  using  

technology  based  constructivist  teaching  (TBCT)  approach  to improve students’ understanding 

achievment in Mechanical Wave material. AIP Conference               Proceedings,               

1848,               050005               (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983961

 

Winatha,  K.  R.,  &  Abubakar,  M.  M.  (2018).  The  usage  effectivity  of  project-based 

interactive  E-Module  in  improving  students’  achievement.  Jurnal  Pendidikan Teknologi         

        Dan                 Kejuruan,                 24(2),                 198–202. 

https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v24i2.20001

 

Wittrock,  M.  C.  (1992).  Generative  learning  processes  of  the  brain.  Educational 

Psychologist, 27(4), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2704_8

 

Wu, W., Wu, Y. J., Chen, C., Kao, H., & Lin, C. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning  

studies :  A  meta-analysis.  Computers  &  Education,  59(2),  817–827. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.016

 

Yee,  L.  S.,  &  Yazid  Abdul  Manap.  (2018).  Attitude  towards  Science  among  lower secondary 

students in Johor Bahru. EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and       Technology       

(EJSMT),       5(2),       40–46.       Diperoleh       daripada 

https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/journal/EDSC

 

Yildirim,  H.  I.,  &  Sensoy,  O.  (2018).  Effect  of  Science  teaching  enriched  with 

technological  practices  on  attitudes  of  secondary  school  7th  grade  students towards 

Science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(5), 947– 959. 

https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060516

 

Yildirim,  I.  (2017).  The  effects  of  gamification-based  teaching  practices  on  student 

achievement   and   students’   attitudes   toward   lessons.   Internet   and   Higher

Education, 33(2016), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.002

 

Yildiz,  E.  P.,  Tezer,  M.,  &  Uzunboylu,  H.  (2018).  Student  opinion  scale  related  to 

moodle LMS in an online learning environment: Validity and reliability study. International   

Journal   of   Interactive   Mobile   Technologies,   12(4),   97–108. 

https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i4.9205

 

Zainiah  Mohamed  Isa,  Juppri  Bacotang,  &  Mazlina  Che  Mustafa.  (2017).  Kesahan kandungan  

Modul  Literasi  Awal  (Modul  Lit-A)  pada  peringkat  kanak-kanak berumur 2+, 3+ dan 4+ tahun. 

Jurnal Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak, 6, 57–68. 

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37134/jpak.vol6.1.5.2017

 

Zajkov,   O.,   Gegovska-Zajkova,   S.,   &   Mitrevski,   B.   (2017).   Textbook-caused 

misconceptions,  inconsistencies,  and  experimental  safety  risks  of  a  grade  8 Physics 

textbook. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 837–852. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9715-0

 

Zakaria   Salameh.   (2017).   The   impact   of   systematic   multimedia   instruction   on 

enhancing   students'   achievement   in   the   course   of   language   evaluation. International 

Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(4), 269–274. 

https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.4.879

 

Zanato  Iksan, Lilia  Halim, & Kamisah  Osman.  (2006). Sikap terhadap  Sains dalam kalangan 

pelajar Sains di peringkat menengah dan matrikulasi. Pertanika Journal of   Social   Sciences   &   

Humanities,   14(2),   131–147.   Diperoleh   daripada 

http://www.myjurnal.my/public/article-view.php?id=12771

 

Zhai,  X.,  Zhang,  M.,  Li,  M.,  &  Zhang,  X.  (2019).  Understanding  the  relationship between 

levels of mobile technology use in high school Physics classrooms and the learning outcome. British 

Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 750–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12700

 

Zimmerman,  B.  J.,  &  Bandura,  A.  (1994).  Impact  of  self-regulatory  influences  on writing 

course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845– 862. 

https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031004845

 

Zlatkovic,  D.,  Denic,  N.,  Petrovic,  M.,  Ilic,  M.,  Khorami,  M.,  Safa,  A.,  Wakil,  K., 

Petkovi?, D., & Vuji?i?, S. (2020). Analysis of adaptive e-learning systems with adjustment of 

Felder-Silverman model in a Moodle DLS. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 803–813. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22251

 

Zoraini  Wati  Abas.  (1995).  Implementation  of  computers  in  Malaysian  schools: Problems  and 

 successes.  Dlm.  D.  Watson  &  D.  Tinsley  (Pnyt.),  Integrating information technology into 

education. Boston: Springer US. Diperoleh daripada https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34842-1_15

 

Zuza,  K.,  Almudí,  J.  M.,  Leniz,  A.,  &  Guisasola,  J.  (2014).  Addressing  students’ 

difficulties  with  Faraday’s  law:  A  guided  problem  solving  approach.  Physical Review    

Special    Topics    -    Physics    Education    Research,    10(1),    1–16.

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010122

 

Zydney,  J.  M.,  &  Warner,  Z.  (2016).  Mobile  apps  for  Science  learning:  Review  of

research.            Computers            and            Education,            94,            1–17.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.