UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

Perbandingan prinsip keadilan dalam teks Periyapuraanam dengan prinsip keadilan dalam sistem perundangan Malaysia

AVAILABLE Thesis 1211 Views
Back to search
Scan QR Code to share or view item link:

Digital Assets & Download Files
Guest Preview PDF
Public preview document
Preview PDF
Full Text PDF
Complete document publication
View PDF File
General Information Cached
Title
Perbandingan prinsip keadilan dalam teks Periyapuraanam dengan prinsip keadilan dalam sistem perundangan Malaysia
Type
Thesis
Main Author
Anbarasan Arunachulan
Subject
PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania
Language Code
tam
Bibliographic Details
Place of Production
Tanjong Malim
Publisher
Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
Year of publication
2021
Degree Type
Masters
Corporate Name
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract

This  research  aimed  to  compare  and  contrast  the  principle  of  justice  present  in Periyapuraanam text and Malaysian Judiciary System. This is a qualitative research, in which  hermeneutic approach was conducted towards the Periyapuraanam text and the Malaysian judiciary  documents. The texts analysis were presented based on the themes and discussed concerning the  similarities and differences between the Periyaapuranam text  and  the  Malaysian  judiciary   system.  The  events  in  relation  to  the  justice  were observed  through  the  history  of  10   Nayanmaar  and  one  Sivanadiyar.  The  findings indicated that there were many similarities and a  few differences of the justice principle between Periyapuraanam text and the Malaysian principle of  justice. The events were classified  into  9  criminal  cases  and  2  civil  cases.  Components   such  as  judiciary knowledge,   vast   experience   in   judiciary,   trials   before    sentencing,   methods   of summoning by the plaintiff, defence by the defendant, proven evidence,  judgement and the compliance to the judgement seen in the Malaysian principle of justice are on par  with the ones found in Periyapuraanam text. In terms of differences, the identified ones include   technological  use,  jail  sentences  and  punishment  for  the  cruelty  towards animals  and   death  sentence  for  certain  crimes.  These  indicates  that  the  principle  of justice is  general and inherited. Overall, the findings proved that the principle of justice is  strongly   practiced  and  adhered  by  the  people  regardless  of  the  time  periods. Ultimately, this  study implied that the literary texts such as Periyapuraanam can also be a source for people’s perusal to obey the country’s laws in everyday life.  

References

Abdul Rahman Haji Ismail dan Azmi Ariffin. (2016). Sejarah Malaysia: Wacana

Kedaulatan  Bangsa,  Kenegaraan  dan  Kemerdekaan.  Pulau  Pinang:  Penerbit Universiti Sains 

Malaysia.

 

Animals  Act  (1953),  (2006).  Kuala  Lumpur:  Pesuruhjaya  Penyemak  Undang- undang, Malaysia

 

Arbitration  Act  (2005),  (2011).  Kuala  Lumpur:  Percetakan  Nasional  Malaysia Berhad

 

Asian Law Student’s Association.  The Abolishment of Jury System in Malaysia. Retrieved      from   

   https://alsamalaysia.com/the-abolishment-of-jury-system-in- malaysia

 

Burns,  N.  &  Grove,  S.  K.  (2003).  Understanding  nursing  research.  (3rd  ed.). 

Philadelphia: Saunders Company.

 

Chin Naam Koo. (1991). A comparative study of Islamic and Civil Law in Malaysia on  Contract,  

Arbitration,  Banking  principles  and  documentation.  (Unpublished master’s thesis). 

International Islamic University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

 

Civil  Law  Act  1956  (Act  67),  (2006).    Kuala  Lumpur:  Pesuruhjaya  Penyemak Undang-undang, 

Malaysia

 

Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012, (2012). Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional 

Malaysia Berhad

 

Contracts  Act  1950  (Act  136),  (2006).   Kuala  Lumpur:  Pesuruhjaya  Penyemak Undang-undang, 

Malaysia

 

Criminal Procedure Code, (2012). Kuala Lumpur: Pesuruhjaya Penyemak Undang-

undang, Malaysia

 

Dangerous   Drug   Act   1952,   (2014).   Kuala   Lumpur:   Pesuruhjaya   Penyemak

Undang-undang, Malaysia

 

Evidence  Act  1950  (Act  56),  (2017).  Kuala  Lumpur:  Pesuruhjaya  Penyemak Undang-undang, 

Malaysia.

 

Federal  Constitution,  (2010).  Kuala  Lumpur:  Pesuruhjaya  Penyemak  Undang- undang, Malaysia.

 

Internal   Security   Act   1960,   (2006).   Kuala   Lumpur:   Pesuruhjaya   Penyemak 

Undang-undang, Malaysia.

 

Kader Prahoo. (2014). Nursing Research: Principles, Processes and Issues. UK: Macmillan Education.

 

Kanthasamy  Nallusamy.  (1993).  A  Study  of  The  Saiva  Siddhantha  Principles  in Periya 

Puraanam. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

 

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology, methods and techniques. (2?? ed.). India: New Age 

International (P) Limited Publishers.

 

Kumaran Ramayah. (2014). Devotional Norms Featured in Periyapuranam. Journal of Indian Culture and 

Civilization, 1, 111-117.

 

Lucy       Trevelyan.       Right       to       a       Jury       Trial.       Retrieved       

from https://www.inbrief.co.uk/legal-system/right-to-trial-by-jury

 

Mariette Peters. (2005). Evidence. Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Law Journal.

 

Marwah Saadi Salleh. (2014). The seller’s obligation to deliver the goods under a contract of sale 

of goods. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.

 

Mediation Act 2012, (2012). Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad

 

Penal  Code  (Act  574),  (2015).  Kuala  Lumpur:  Pesuruhjaya  Penyemak  Undang- undang, Malaysia

 

Rau & Kumar. (2006). General Principles of Malaysian Legal System. Malaysia:

International Law Book Service.

 

Rules  of  Court  2012,  (2012).  Kuala  Lumpur:  Pesuruhjaya  Penyemak  Undang-

undang, Malaysia.

 

Sarada  Thallam.  (2013).  Cekkilar’s  Periyapuranam  and  the  Story  of  Karaikkal

Ammai. Journal of South Asian Studies, 1, 83-90.

 

Sharifah   Suhana   Ahmad.   (2007).   Malaysian   Legal   System.   Kuala   Lumpur: LexisNexis.

 

Shunmugam, Chandra Mohan., & Sukumaran Ramankutty (2020). The Introduction and  Development  of  

Trial  by  Jury  in  Malaysia  and  Singapore.  Singapore:  National University of Singapore

 

Suzanna Abdul Hadi, (2009). Jenayah internet: pengawalseliaan dan pentadbiran undang-undang  di  

Malaysia  (Unpublished  master’s  thesis).  University  Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

 

Vasantha Punniamoorthy. (2005). Law of evidence and criminal procedure: is there fair balance 

struck between seeking justice and the rights of an accused person in Malaysia  and  the  United  

Kingdom  (Unpublished  master’s  thesis).  Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia.

 

Vijayalakshmi  Venugopal,  A.  (2001).  Introduction  to  Law  in  Malaysia.  Kuala Lumpur: Sweet & 

Maxwell Asia.

 

Wu  Min  Aun.  (1994).  The  Malaysian  Legal  System.  Kuala  Lumpur:  Longman Malaysia.

 

Zulazhar Tahir, (2011). Sistem keadilan jenayah di Malaysia: suatu analisis dari perspektif   

hak-hak   tertuduh   (Unpublished   doctoral   dissertation).   University

Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

 

 

 

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.
Back to search
Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.