UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
This research aims to assist the educational institutions, teachers and students for the
selection of augmented reality (AR) educational applications. Educational institutions face
the challenge of evaluating and selecting educational AR applications particularly.
Therefore, the main problem is the appropriate selection of instructional augmented reality
applications. Framework was proposed to aid the educational institutions in selection and
ranking the available AR educational applications to select the best one. Improper selection
decisions may cause educational institutions to lose time, effort, and financial costs. The
evaluation and benchmarking of AR educational applications are challenging because of
the multiple conflicting evaluation criteria. This study constructed a decision matrix (DM)
based on the crossover of the ‘three evaluation perspectives (usability, immersing and user
perspective) with ‘six AR educational applications’. The matrix was evaluated using the
criteria developed from the evaluation of 15 experts. The alternatives were evaluated by 13
users. Then asked to answer a questionnaire consisting of 90 questions for each application
.The AR educational applications were then selected and ranked using multi-criteria
decision-making techniques, including the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), ENTROPY
and ‘VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje’ (VIKOR). AHP was
applied to calculate the weights of the main evaluation criteria, ENTROPY to calculate the
weights for evaluation sub-criteria and VIKOR to select and rank the AR educational
applications. The results showed that (1) the integration of AHP, ENTROPY and VIKOR
effectively solved the AR educational applications benchmarking\selection problems. (2)
The rankings of the AR educational applications obtained from internal and external
VIKOR group decision making were almost the same.
(3) The best AR educational application was more immersive and more usable. In the
objective validation, significant differences were recognized between the groups’ scores,
thereby indicating that the ranking results of internal and external VIKOR group decision
making were valid. |
References |
Abdullateef, B. N., Elias, N. F., Mohamed, H., Zaidan, A., & Zaidan, B. (2016a). An evaluation and selection problems of OSS-LMS packages. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 248.
Abdullateef, B. N., Elias, N. F., Mohamed, H., Zaidan, A. A., & Zaidan, B. B. (2016b). An evaluation and selection problems of OSS-LMS packages. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 248. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1828-y. doi:10.1186/s40064- 016-1828-y
Adunlin, G., Diaby, V., & Xiao, H. (2015). Application of multicriteria decision analysis in health care: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Health Expectations, 18(6), 1894-1905.
Ahmad, W. N. K. W., Rezaei, J., Sadaghiani, S., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2017). Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using Best Worst Method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 242-252.
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.
Akin, N. T. A., & Gokturk, M. (2019). Comparison of the Theory of Mind Tests on the Paper, 2D Touch Screen and Augmented Reality Environments on the Students With Neurodevelopmental Disorders. IEEE Access, 7, 52390-52404.
Alamoodi, A., Zaidan, B., Zaidan, A. A., Samuri, S. M., Ismail, A. R., Zughoul, O., . . . Chyad, M. (2019). A review of data analysis for early-childhood period: taxonomy, motivations, challenges, recommendation, and methodological aspects. IEEE Access, 7, 51069-51103.
Albahri, A., Albahri, O., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Hashim, M., Alsalem, M., . . . Enaizan, O. (2019). Based multiple heterogeneous wearable sensors: A smart real-time health monitoring structured for hospitals distributor. IEEE Access, 7, 37269-37323.
Albahri, O., Albahri, A., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Alsalem, M., Mohsin, A., . . . Enaizan, O. (2019). Fault-tolerant mHealth framework in the context of IoT-based real-time wearable health data sensors. IEEE Access, 7, 50052-50080.
Aldlaigan, A. H., & Buttle, F. A. (2002). SYSTRA‐SQ: a new measure of bank service quality. International journal of service industry management.
Alshafeey, G. A., Lakulu, M. M., Chyad, M., Abdullah, A., & Salem, G. (2019). Augmented Reality for the Disabled: Review Articles. Journal of ICT in Education, 1, 46-57.
AlShifay, G., Udofia, J., Zuhair, I., & Hassan, H. DESKTOP VIRTUALISATION AS A TOOL TO SUPPORT IT VIRTUAL TEAM. RESEARCH JOURNAL, 104.
Altinpulluk, H. (2019). Determining the trends of using augmented reality in education between 2006-2016. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1089-1114.
Andrea, R., Lailiyah, S., & Agus, F. (2019). " Magic Boosed" an elementary school geometry textbook with marker-based augmented reality. Telkomnika, 17(3), 1242- 1249.
Ar, I. M., & Kurtaran, A. (2013). Evaluating the relative efficiency of commercial banks in Turkey: An integrated AHP/DEA approach. International Business Research, 6(4), 129.
Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T. M., & Venkatesan, V. P. (2013). A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1(1), 31-43.
Ashour, O. M., & Okudan, G. E. (2010). Fuzzy AHP and utility theory based patient sorting in emergency departments. International Journal of Collaborative Enterprise, 1(3- 4), 332-358.
Azadeh, A., Asadzadeh, S. M., & Tanhaeean, M. (2017). A consensus-based AHP for improved assessment of resilience engineering in maintenance organizations. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 47, 151-160.
Azeez, D., Ali, M. A. M., Gan, K. B., & Saiboon, I. (2013). Comparison of adaptive neurofuzzy inference system and artificial neutral networks model to categorize patients in the emergency department. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 416.
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
Baltussen, R., & Niessen, L. (2006). Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost effectiveness and resource allocation, 4(1), 14.
Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Alcañiz, M., Liaño, V., Guerrero, B., & Rey, B. (2004). Immersion and emotion: their impact on the sense of presence. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 7(6), 734-741.
Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051- 13069.
Belton, V., & Stewart, T. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach: Springer Science & Business Media.
Bian, Y., Yang, C., Gao, F., Li, H., Zhou, S., Li, H., . . . Meng, X. (2016). A framework for physiological indicators of flow in VR games: construction and preliminary evaluation. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 20(5), 821-832.
Bronack, S. C. (2011). The role of immersive media in online education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59(2), 113-117.
Bursali, H., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Effect of augmented reality applications on secondary school students' reading comprehension and learning permanency. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 126-135.
Cai, S., Chiang, F.-K., Sun, Y., Lin, C., & Lee, J. J. (2017). Applications of augmented reality-based natural interactive learning in magnetic field instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 778-791.
Cai, S., Liu, E., Yang, Y., & Liang, J. C. (2019). Tablet‐based AR technology: Impacts on students’ conceptions and approaches to learning mathematics according to their self‐efficacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 248-263.
Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F.-K. (2014). A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 31- 40.
Cakir, R., & Korkmaz, O. (2019). The effectiveness of augmented reality environments on individuals with special education needs. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1631-1659.
Campanella, G., & Ribeiro, R. A. (2011). A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making. Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 52-60.
Cavallini, C., Giorgetti, A., Citti, P., & Nicolaie, F. (2013). Integral aided method for material selection based on quality function deployment and comprehensive VIKOR algorithm. Materials & Design, 47, 27-34.
Chang, H.-Y., Hsu, Y.-S., & Wu, H.-K. (2016). A comparison study of augmented reality versus interactive simulation technology to support student learning of a socioscientific issue. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1148-1161.
Chang, R.-C., Chung, L.-Y., & Huang, Y.-M. (2016). Developing an interactive augmented reality system as a complement to plant education and comparing its effectiveness with video learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1245-1264.
Chang, S.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2018). Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education.
Chen, C.-H., Lee, I.-J., & Lin, L.-Y. (2016). Augmented reality-based video-modeling storybook of nonverbal facial cues for children with autism spectrum disorder to improve their perceptions and judgments of facial expressions and emotions. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 477-485.
Chen, C.-p., & Wang, C.-H. (2015). Employing augmented-reality-embedded instruction to disperse the imparities of individual differences in earth science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 835-847.
Chen, J. A., Metcalf, S. J., & Tutwiler, M. S. (2014). Motivation and beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge within an immersive virtual ecosystems environment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 112-123.
Chen, N., Lin, J., Hoi, S. C., Xiao, X., & Zhang, B. (2014). AR-miner: mining informative reviews for developers from mobile app marketplace. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 36th international conference on software engineering.
Chen, P., Liu, X., Cheng, W., & Huang, R. (2017). A review of using Augmented Reality in Education from 2011 to 2016. In Innovations in Smart Learning (pp. 13-18): Springer.
Chen, Y.-H., & Wang, C.-H. (2018). Learner presence, perception, and learning achievements in augmented–reality–mediated learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 695-708.
Cheng, K.-H. (2018). Surveying Students’ Conceptions of Learning Science by Augmented Reality and their Scientific Epistemic Beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1147-1159.
Cheng, M. T., She, H. C., & Annetta, L. A. (2015). Game immersion experience: its hierarchical structure and impact on game‐based science learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 232-253.
Chiang, T. H.-C., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students' learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352- 365.
Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). Students' online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities. Computers & Education, 78, 97-108.
Chiu, J. L., DeJaegher, C. J., & Chao, J. (2015). The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students' understanding of gas properties. Computers & Education, 85, 59-73.
Chiu, W.-Y., Tzeng, G.-H., & Li, H.-L. (2013). A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business. Knowledge-Based Systems, 37, 48-61.
Chou, S.-Y., Chang, Y.-H., & Shen, C.-Y. (2008). A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 132-145.
Coxon, M., Kelly, N., & Page, S. (2016). Individual differences in virtual reality: Are spatial presence and spatial ability linked? Virtual Reality, 20(4), 203-212.
Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J. N. (2016). How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272-309.
da Silva, M. M., Teixeira, J. M. X., Cavalcante, P. S., & Teichrieb, V. (2019). Perspectives on how to evaluate augmented reality technology tools for education: a systematic review. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 25(1), 3.
Dalim, C. S. C., Kolivand, H., Kadhim, H., Sunar, M. S., & Billinghurst, M. (2017). Factors influencing the acceptance of augmented reality in education: a review of the literature.
Dawood, K. A., Sharif, K. Y., Zaidan, A., Ghani, A. A. A., Zulzalil, H. B., & Zaidan, B. J. I. A. (2019). Mapping and Analysis of Open Source Software (OSS) usability for sustainable OSS product. 7, 65913-65933.
Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. science, 323(5910), 66-69.
Dolan, J. G., Boohaker, E., Allison, J., & Imperiale, T. F. (2013). Patients’ preferences and priorities regarding colorectal cancer screening. Medical Decision Making, 33(1), 59-70.
dos Santos Nunes, E. P., Roque, L. G., & dos Santos Nunes, F. d. L. (2016). Measuring Knowledge Acquisition in 3D Virtual Learning Environments. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 36(2), 58-67.
Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., & DeLiema, D. (2015). Constructing liminal blends in a collaborative augmented-reality learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 7-34.
Erbas, C., & Demirer, V. (2019). The effects of augmented reality on students' academic achievement and motivation in a biology course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Felnhofer, A., Kothgassner, O. D., Schmidt, M., Heinzle, A.-K., Beutl, L., Hlavacs, H., & Kryspin-Exner, I. (2015). Is virtual reality emotionally arousing? Investigating five emotion inducing virtual park scenarios. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 82, 48-56.
Frank, J. A., & Kapila, V. (2017). Mixed-reality learning environments: Integrating mobile interfaces with laboratory test-beds. Computers & Education, 110, 88-104.
Gan, H. S., Tee, N. Y. K., Bin Mamtaz, M. R., Xiao, K., Cheong, B. H. P., Liew, O. W., & Ng, T. W. (2018). Augmented reality experimentation on oxygen gas generation from hydrogen peroxide and bleach reaction. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 46(3), 245-252.
Garg, H. (2019). Intuitionistic fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators with entropy weight and their applications to multi-criteria decision-making problems. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 43(3), 597- 613.
Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 1-13.
Georgiou, Y., & Kyza, E. A. (2017a). A design-based approach to augmented reality location-based activities: investigating immersion in relation to student learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning.
Georgiou, Y., & Kyza, E. A. (2017b). The development and validation of the ARI questionnaire: An instrument for measuring immersion in location-based augmented reality settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98, 24-37.
Georgiou, Y., & Kyza, E. A. (2018). Relations between student motivation, immersion and learning outcomes in location-based augmented reality settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 173-181.
Giasiranis, S., & Sofos, L. (2017). Flow Experience and Educational Effectiveness of Teaching Informatics using AR. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 78-88.
Goff, E. E., Mulvey, K. L., Irvin, M. J., & Hartstone-Rose, A. (2018). Applications of Augmented Reality in Informal Science Learning Sites: a Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-15.
Gopalan, V., Bakar, J. A. A., Zulkifli, A. N., & Alwi, A. (2018). A Review of Augmented Multimedia Elements in Science Learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 10(1-10), 87-92.
Grinberg, A. M., Careaga, J. S., Mehl, M. R., & O’Connor, M.-F. (2014). Social engagement and user immersion in a socially based virtual world. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 479-486.
Gul, M., Celik, E., Aydin, N., Gumus, A. T., & Guneri, A. F. (2016). A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Applied Soft Computing, 46, 60-89.
Gün, E. T., & Atasoy, B. (2017). The effects of augmented reality on elementary school students’ spatial ability and academic achievement. Egitim ve Bilim, 42(191).
Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121(Supplement C), 23-31. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705117300114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.01.010
Gupta, H. (2018). Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 35-47.
Gupta, H., & Barua, M. K. (2017). Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152, 242-258.
Guzman, E., El-Haliby, M., & Bruegge, B. (2015). Ensemble methods for app review classification: An approach for software evolution (n). Paper presented at the 2015 30th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE).
Hansen, A. H., & Mossberg, L. (2013). Consumer immersion: A key to extraordinary experiences. In Handbook on the experience economy: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Harncharnchai, A., & Saeheaw, T. (2018). Context-aware learning using augmented reality and WebQuest to improve students' learning outcomes in history. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 23(3), 283-303.
Havlíčková, V., Šorgo, A., Bílek, M., Lamanauskas, V., Šašić, S. Š., Ersozlu, Z. N., . . . Ersozlu, A. (2018). Can Virtual Dissection Replace Traditional Hands-on Dissection in School Biology Laboratory Work? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1415-1429.
Hilgerink, M. P., Hummel, M. J., Manohar, S., Vaartjes, S. R., & IJzerman, M. J. (2011). Assessment of the added value of the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis. Medical devices (Auckland, NZ), 4, 107.
Hoehle, H., & Venkatesh, V. (2015). Mobile application usability: conceptualization and instrument development. Mis Quarterly, 39(2), 435-472.
Hsu, T.-C. (2017). Learning English with augmented reality: Do learning styles matter? Computers & Education, 106, 137-149.
Huang, T.-C., Chen, C.-C., & Chou, Y.-W. (2016). Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Computers & Education, 96, 72-82.
Huang, T.-L., & Liao, S.-L. (2017). Creating e-shopping multisensory flow experience through augmented-reality interactive technology. Internet Research.
Huang, T.-L., & Liao, S. (2015). A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: the moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 269-295.
Huang, T.-L., & Liu, F. H. (2014). Formation of augmented-reality interactive technology's persuasive effects from the perspective of experiential value. Internet Research.
Huang, Y.-M., & Lin, P. H. (2017). Evaluating students’ learning achievement and flow experience with tablet PCs based on AR and tangible technology in u-learning. Library Hi Tech, 35(4), 602-614.
Hudson, S., Matson-Barkat, S., Pallamin, N., & Jégou, G. (2019). With or without you? Interaction and immersion in a virtual reality experience. Journal of Business Research, 100, 459-468.
Hung, Y. H., Chen, C. H., & Huang, S. W. (2017). Applying augmented reality to enhance learning: a study of different teaching materials. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(3), 252-266.
Hwang, G.-J., Wu, P.-H., Chen, C.-C., & Tu, N.-T. (2016). Effects of an augmented realitybased educational game on students' learning achievements and attitudes in realworld observations. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1895-1906.
Ibáñez, M.-B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education.
Ibanez, M.-B., Di-Serio, A., Villaran-Molina, D., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2015). Support for augmented reality simulation systems: The effects of scaffolding on learning outcomes and behavior patterns. IEEE Transactions on learning technologies, 9(1), 46-56.
Ibanez, M.-B., Di-Serio, A., Villaran-Molina, D., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2016). Support for augmented reality simulation systems: the effects of scaffolding on learning outcomes and behavior patterns. IEEE Transactions on learning technologies, 9(1), 46-56.
Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1-13.
Jablonsky, J. (2014). MS Excel based software support tools for decision problems with multiple criteria. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 251-258.
Jadhav, A., & Sonar, R. (2009). Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), weighted scoring method (WSM), and hybrid knowledge based system (HKBS) for software selection: a comparative study. Paper presented at the 2009 Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering & Technology.
Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Ismail, M. Y., Sapuan, S., & Bahraminasab, M. (2011). A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Materials & Design, 32(3), 1215-1221.
Joo-Nagata, J., Abad, F. M., Giner, J. G.-B., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Augmented reality and pedestrian navigation through its implementation in m-learning and elearning: Evaluation of an educational program in Chile. Computers & Education, 111, 1-17.
Jumaah, F., Zadain, A., Zaidan, B., Hamzah, A., & Bahbibi, R. (2018). Decision-Making Solution based Multi-Measurement Design Parameter for Optimization of GPS Receiver Tracking Channels in Static and Dynamic Real-Time Positioning Multipath Environment. Measurement.
Jun, H., XiaoLing, Y., Yi, L., HUANG, W., Jun, C., & DaHu, L. (2019). Comprehensive Evaluation of Microgrid Planning Scheme based on AHP-Entropy method. Paper presented at the 2019 IEEE Sustainable Power and Energy Conference (iSPEC).
Jung, T., tom Dieck, M. C., Lee, H., & Chung, N. (2016). Effects of virtual reality and augmented reality on visitor experiences in museum. In Information and communication technologies in tourism 2016 (pp. 621-635): Springer.
Kabir, M. A., Salem, O. A., & Rehman, M. U. (2017). Discovering knowledge from mobile application users for usability improvement: A fuzzy association rule mining approach. Paper presented at the 2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS).
Kalid, N., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Salman, O. H., Hashim, M., Albahri, O., & Albahri, A. (2018). Based on real time remote health monitoring systems: a new approach for prioritization “large scales data” patients with chronic heart diseases using body sensors and communication technology. Journal of medical systems, 42(4), 69.
Karahalios, H. (2017). The application of the AHP-TOPSIS for evaluating ballast water treatment systems by ship operators. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 172-184.
Kaur, S., Sehra, S. K., & Sehra, S. S. (2016). A framework for software quality model selection using topsis. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT).
Kaya, İ., Çolak, M., & Terzi, F. (2018). Use of MCDM techniques for energy policy and decision‐making problems: A review. International Journal of Energy Research, 42(7), 2344-2372.
Kazanidis, I., Palaigeorgiou, G., Papadopoulou, Α., & Tsinakos, A. (2018). Augmented Interactive Video: Enhancing Video Interactivity for the School Classroom. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 11(2), 174-181.
Ke, F., Lee, S., & Xu, X. (2016). Teaching training in a mixed-reality integrated learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 212-220.
Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs: Cambridge university press.
Kim, M. J., & Cho, M. E. (2014). Studying children's tactile problem-solving in a digital environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 1-13.
Kim, S. K., Kang, S.-J., Choi, Y.-J., Choi, M.-H., & Hong, M. (2017). Augmented-Reality Survey: from Concept to Application. KSII Transactions on Internet & Information Systems, 11(2).
Kornyshova, E., & Salinesi, C. (2007, 1-5 April 2007). MCDM Techniques Selection Approaches: State of the Art. Paper presented at the 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making.
Kourouthanassis, P., Boletsis, C., Bardaki, C., & Chasanidou, D. (2015). Tourists responses to mobile augmented reality travel guides: The role of emotions on adoption behavior. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 18, 71-87.
Küçük, S., Yýlmaz, R. M., & Göktaþ, Y. (2014). Augmented reality for learning English: Achievement, attitude and cognitive load levels of students. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 39(176).
Kuhn, J., Lukowicz, P., Hirth, M., Poxrucker, A., Weppner, J., & Younas, J. (2016). gPhysics-Using Smart Glasses for Head-Centered, Context-Aware Learning in Physics Experiments. Paper presented at the TLT.
Kyza, E. A., & Georgiou, Y. (2019). Scaffolding augmented reality inquiry learning: the design and investigation of the TraceReaders location-based, augmented reality platform. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(2), 211-225.
Lahby, M., Cherkaoui, L., & Adib, A. (2013). An enhanced-TOPSIS based network selection technique for next generation wireless networks. Paper presented at the ICT 2013.
Lai, A. F., Chen, C. H., & Lee, G. Y. (2019). An augmented reality‐based learning approach to enhancing students’ science reading performances from the perspective of the cognitive load theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 232-247.
Laine, T. H., & Suk, H. J. (2016). Designing mobile augmented reality exergames. Games and Culture, 11(5), 548-580.
Lee, I.-J. (2019). Using augmented reality to train students to visualize three-dimensional drawings of mortise–tenon joints in furniture carpentry. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-15.
Lee, I.-J., Chen, C.-H., Wang, C.-P., & Chung, C.-H. (2018). Augmented Reality Plus Concept Map Technique to Teach Children with ASD to Use Social Cues When Meeting and Greeting. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(3), 227-243.
Li, X., & Zhang, Z. (2015). A User-App Interaction Reference Model for Mobility Requirements Analysis. ICSEA 2015, 170-177.
Li, X., Zhang, Z., & Stefanidis, K. (2018). Sentiment-aware Analysis of Mobile Apps User Reviews Regarding Particular Updates. Paper presented at the ICSEA 2018.
Liberatore, M. J., & Nydick, R. L. (2008). The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 194-207.
Lin, C.-Y., Chai, H.-C., Wang, J.-y., Chen, C.-J., Liu, Y.-H., Chen, C.-W., . . . Huang, Y.- M. (2016). Augmented reality in educational activities for children with disabilities. Displays, 42, 51-54.
Lin, H.-C. K., Chen, M.-C., & Chang, C.-K. (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of learning solid geometry by using an augmented reality-assisted learning system. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 799-810.
Lindner, C., Rienow, A., & Jürgens, C. (2019). Augmented Reality applications as digital experiments for education–An example in the Earth-Moon System. Acta Astronautica.
Liou, H.-H., Yang, S. J., Chen, S. Y., & Tarng, W. (2017). The influences of the 2d imagebased augmented reality and virtual reality on student learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 110-121.
Lo, H.-W., Liou, J. J., Wang, H.-S., & Tsai, Y.-S. (2018). An integrated model for solving problems in green supplier selection and order allocation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 339-352.
Lotfi, F. H., & Fallahnejad, R. (2010). Imprecise Shannon’s entropy and multi attribute decision making. Entropy, 12(1), 53-62.
Loup-Escande, E., Frenoy, R., Poplimont, G., Thouvenin, I., Gapenne, O., & Megalakaki, O. (2017). Contributions of mixed reality in a calligraphy learning task: Effects of supplementary visual feedback and expertise on cognitive load, user experience and gestural performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 42-49.
Lu, S.-J., & Liu, Y.-C. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525-541.
Maalej, W., & Nabil, H. (2015). Bug report, feature request, or simply praise? on automatically classifying app reviews. Paper presented at the 2015 IEEE 23rd international requirements engineering conference (RE).
Mahjouri, M., Ishak, M. B., Torabian, A., Manaf, L. A., Halimoon, N., & Ghoddusi, J. (2017). Optimal selection of Iron and Steel wastewater treatment technology using integrated multi-criteria decision-making techniques and fuzzy logic. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 107, 54-68.
Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis: John Wiley & Sons.
Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C. E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469-486.
Martins, V. F., Kirner, T. G., & Kirner, C. (2015). Subjective usability evaluation criteria of augmented reality applications. Paper presented at the International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality.
McGloin, R., Farrar, K. M., & Fishlock, J. (2015). Triple whammy! Violent games and violent controllers: Investigating the use of realistic gun controllers on perceptions of realism, immersion, and outcome aggression. Journal of communication, 65(2), 280-299.
Medineckienė, M., & Björk, F. (2011). Owner preferences regarding renovation measures– the demonstration of using multi-criteria decision making. Journal of civil engineering and management, 17(2), 284-295.
Mills, A. F. (2016). A simple yet effective decision support policy for mass-casualty triage. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(3), 734-745.
Morschheuser, B., Riar, M., Hamari, J., & Maedche, A. (2017). How games induce cooperation? A study on the relationship between game features and we-intentions in an augmented reality game. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 169-183.
Mountford, V. A., Tchanturia, K., & Valmaggia, L. (2016). “What Are You Thinking When You Look at Me?” A Pilot Study of the Use of Virtual Reality in Body Image. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(2), 93-99.
Mylonas, G., Triantafyllis, C., & Amaxilatis, D. (2019). An Augmented Reality Prototype for supporting IoT-based Educational Activities for Energy-efficient School Buildings. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 343, 89-101.
Nafari, J., Arab, A., & Ghaffari, S. (2017). Through the looking glass: Analysis of factors influencing Iranian student’s study abroad motivations and destination choice. SAGE Open, 7(2), 2158244017716711.
Nagata, J. J., Giner, J. R. G.-B., & Abad, F. M. (2016). Virtual heritage of the territory: Design and implementation of educational resources in augmented reality and mobile pedestrian navigation. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 11(1), 41-46.
Nilsson, H., Nordström, E.-M., & Öhman, K. (2016). Decision support for participatory forest planning using AHP and TOPSIS. Forests, 7(5), 100.
Oh, C., Herrera, F., & Bailenson, J. (2019). The Effects of Immersion and Real-World Distractions on Virtual Social Interactions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(6), 365-372.
Oliveira, M., Fontes, D. B., & Pereira, M. T. R. (2013). Multicriteria decision making: A case study in the automobile industry.
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514-529.
Pallavicini, F., Pepe, A., & Minissi, M. E. (2019). Gaming in Virtual Reality: What Changes in Terms of Usability, Emotional Response and Sense of Presence Compared to Non-Immersive Video Games? Simulation & Gaming, 50(2), 136- 159.
Pamučar, D., Petrović, I., & Ćirović, G. (2018). Modification of the Best–Worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 91, 89-106.
Perez-Sanagustin, M., Hernández-Leo, D., Santos, P., Kloos, C. D., & Blat, J. (2014). Augmenting reality and formality of informal and non-formal settings to enhance blended learning. IEEE Transactions on learning technologies, 7(2), 118-131.
Ponners, P. J., & Piller, Y. (2019). Investigating the Impact of Augmented Reality on Elementary Students’ Mental Model of Scientists. TechTrends, 63(1), 33-40.
Pradhan, L., Zhang, C., & Bethard, S. (2016). Towards extracting coherent user concerns and their hierarchical organization from user reviews. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE 17th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI).
Pribeanu, C., Balog, A., & Iordache, D. D. (2017). Measuring the perceived quality of an AR-based learning application: a multidimensional model. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 482-495.
Qader, M., Zaidan, B., Zaidan, A., Ali, S., Kamaluddin, M., & Radzi, W. (2017). A methodology for football players selection problem based on multi-measurements criteria analysis. Measurement, 111, 38-50.
Radu, I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: a meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1533-1543.
Rahmat, H., Zulzalil, H., Ghani, A. A. A., & Kamaruddin, A. (2015). An approach towards development of evaluation framework for usability of smartphone applications. Paper presented at the 2015 9th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference (MySEC).
Rao, A. R. D., Sai, N. V., & Babu, K. P. (2017). An Integrated approach using VIKOR and ENTROPY methods for a Supplier selection problem. Int. J. Innov. Eng. Technol., 8(3), 1-9.
Raviv, G., Shapira, A., & Fishbain, B. (2017). AHP-based analysis of the risk potential of safety incidents: Case study of cranes in the construction industry. Safety science, 91, 298-309.
Read, J. C., & Bohr, I. (2014). User experience while viewing stereoscopic 3D television. Ergonomics, 57(8), 1140-1153.
Ren, J. (2018). Selection of sustainable prime mover for combined cooling, heat, and power technologies under uncertainties: An interval multicriteria decision‐making approach. International Journal of Energy Research, 42(8), 2655-2669.
Rezaei, J. (2015a). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53(Supplement C), 49-57. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048314001480. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
Rezaei, J. (2015b). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57. Rochlen, L. R., Levine, R., & Tait, A. R. (2017). First person point of view augmented reality for central line insertion training: A usability and feasibility study. Simulation in healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 12(1), 57.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology, 15(3), 234-281.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, new york: Mcgrew hill. International, Translated to Russian, Portuguesses and Chinese, Revised edition, Paperback (1996, 2000), Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 9, 19-22.
Saaty, T. L., & Ozdemir, M. S. (2003). Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Mathematical and computer modelling, 38(3-4), 233-244.
Saidin, N. F., Halim, N. D. A., & Yahaya, N. (2015). A review of research on augmented reality in education: Advantages and applications. International education studies, 8(13), 1.
Salman, O., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Naserkalid, & Hashim, M. (2017). Novel methodology for triage and prioritizing using “big data” patients with chronic heart diseases through telemedicine environmental. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 16(05), 1211-1245.
Sanabria, J. C. (2015). The Gradual Immersion Method (GIM): Pedagogical Transformation into Mixed Reality. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 369-374.
Sanabria, J. C., & Arámburo-Lizárraga, J. (2017). Enhancing 21st century skills with AR: Using the gradual immersion method to develop collaborative creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 487-501.
Santos, M. E. C., Chen, A., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Miyazaki, J., & Kato, H. (2014). Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on learning technologies, 7(1), 38-56.
Sekhavat, Y. A., & Zarei, H. (2018). Sense of immersion in computer games using single and stereoscopic augmented reality. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(2), 187-194.
Serrai, W., Abdelli, A., Mokdad, L., & Hammal, Y. (2016). An efficient approach for Web service selection. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC).
Sherekar, V., Tatikonda, M., & Student, M. (2016). Impact of factor affecting on labour productivity in construction projects by AHP method. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Comput, 6(6).
Shin, D.-H., & Biocca, F. (2017). Explicating user behavior toward multi-screen adoption and diffusion. Internet Research.
Shin, D. (2018). Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience? Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 64-73.
Shin, D. (2019). How does immersion work in augmented reality games? A user-centric view of immersion and engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 22(9), 1212-1229.
Shojaei, P., Haeri, S. A. S., & Mohammadi, S. (2018). Airports evaluation and ranking model using Taguchi loss function, best-worst method and VIKOR technique. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 4-13.
Singh, A. (2014). Major MCDM Techniques and their application-A Review (Vol. 4).
Singh, A., & Malik, S. K. (2014). Major MCDM Techniques and their application-A Review. IOSR Journal of Engineering, 4(5), 15-25.
Škola, F., & Liarokapis, F. (2016). Examining the effect of body ownership in immersive virtual and augmented reality environments. The Visual Computer, 32(6-8), 761- 770.
Smith, J., Cook, A., & Packer, C. (2010). Evaluation criteria to assess the value of identification sources for horizon scanning. International journal of technology assessment in health care, 26(3), 348-353.
Sofuoğlu, M. A., & Orak, S. (2017). A novel hybrid multi criteria decision making model: application to turning operations. a a, 21(22), 2.
Solak, E., & Cakir, R. (2016). Investigating the role of augmented reality technology in the language classroom. Online Submission, 18(4), 1067-1085.
Stoyanova, D., Kafadarova, N., & Stoyanova-Petrova, S. (2015). Enhancing elementary student learning in natural sciences through mobile augmented reality technology. Bulgarian Chemical Communications, 47, 532-536.
Suh, A., & Prophet, J. (2018). The state of immersive technology research: A literature analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 77-90.
Sutadian, A. D., Muttil, N., Yilmaz, A. G., & Perera, B. (2017). Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to identify parameter weights for developing a water quality index. Ecological Indicators, 75, 220-233.
Sziebig, G., Rudas, I., Demiralp, M., & Mastorakis, N. (2009). Achieving Total Immersion: Technology Trends behind Augmented Reality- A Survey. Paper presented at the WSEAS International Conference. Proceedings. Mathematics and Computers in Science and Engineering.
Tarng, W., Lin, Y.-S., Lin, C.-P., & Ou, K.-L. (2016). Development of a lunar-phase observation system based on augmented reality and mobile learning technologies. Mobile Information Systems, 2016.
Tavana, M., & Hatami-Marbini, A. (2011). A group AHP-TOPSIS framework for human spaceflight mission planning at NASA. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 13588-13603. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095741741100635X. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.108
Techakosit, S., & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Connectivism learning environment in augmented reality science laboratory to enhance scientific literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2108-2115.
Tekedere, H., & Göke, H. (2016). Examining the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality Applications in Education: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(16), 9469-9481.
Tian, K., Endo, M., Urata, M., Mouri, K., & Yasuda, T. (2014). Multi-viewpoint smartphone AR-based learning system for astronomical observation. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 6(5), 396-400.
Tian, Z.-p., Wang, J.-q., & Zhang, H.-y. (2018). An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy, and VIKOR methods. Applied Soft Computing, 72, 636-646.
Tobar-Muñoz, H., Baldiris, S., & Fabregat, R. (2017). Augmented reality game-based learning: enriching students’ experience during reading comprehension activities. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(7), 901-936.
Toledo-Morales, P., & Sanchez-Garcia, J. M. (2018). Use of Augmented Reality in Social Sciences as Educational Research. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 38-52.
Torres, F., Tovar, L. A. N., & Egremy, M. C. (2015). Virtual interactive laboratory applied to high schools programs. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 233-238.
Tussyadiah, I. P., Jung, T. H., & tom Dieck, M. C. (2018). Embodiment of wearable augmented reality technology in tourism experiences. Journal of Travel research, 57(5), 597-611.
Tussyadiah, I. P., Wang, D., Jung, T. H., & tom Dieck, M. C. (2018). Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: Empirical evidence from tourism. Tourism Management, 66, 140-154.
van Til, J. A., Renzenbrink, G. J., Dolan, J. G., & IJzerman, M. J. (2008). The use of the analytic hierarchy process to aid decision making in acquired equinovarus deformity. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 89(3), 457-462.
Vella, K., Klarkowski, M., Johnson, D., Hides, L., & Wyeth, P. (2016). The social context of video game play: Challenges and strategies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.
Wang, Y.-H. (2017). Exploring the effectiveness of integrating augmented reality-based materials to support writing activities. Computers & Education, 113, 162-176.
Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Computers & Education, 81, 221-234.
Whaiduzzaman, M., Gani, A., Anuar, N. B., Shiraz, M., Haque, M. N., & Haque, I. T. (2014). Cloud service selection using multicriteria decision analysis. The Scientific World Journal, 2014.
Widiaty, I., Riza, L. S., Danuwijaya, A. A., Hurriyati, R., & Mubaroq, S. R. (2017). MOBILE-BASED AUGMENTED REALITY FOR LEARNING 3- DIMENSIONAL SPATIAL BATIK-BASED OBJECTS. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 12, 12-22.
Wildan, A., Cheong, B. H.-P., Xiao, K., Liew, O. W., & Ng, T. W. (2019). Growth measurement of surface colonies of bacteria using augmented reality. Journal of Biological Education, 1-14.
Wind, Y., & Saaty, T. L. (1980). Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Management science, 26(7), 641-658.
Wu, P.-H., Hwang, G.-J., Yang, M.-L., & Chen, C.-H. (2018). Impacts of integrating the repertory grid into an augmented reality-based learning design on students’ learning achievements, cognitive load and degree of satisfaction. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 221-234.
Yang, Q., Zhang, Z., You, X., & Chen, T. (2016). Evaluation and classification of overseas talents in China based on the BWM for intuitionistic relations. Symmetry, 8(11), 137.
Yang, Y.-P. O., Shieh, H.-M., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2013). A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment. Information Sciences, 232, 482-500.
Yas, Q. M., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Rahmatullah, B., & Karim, H. A. (2017). Comprehensive Insights into Evaluation and Benchmarking of Real-time Skin Detectors: Review, Open Issues & Challenges, and Recommended Solutions. Measurement.
Yilmaz, R. M. (2016). Educational magic toys developed with augmented reality technology for early childhood education. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 240- 248.
Yilmaz, Z. A., & Batdi, V. (2016). A Meta-Analytic and Thematic Comparative Analysis of the Integration of Augmented Reality Applications into Education. Egitim ve Bilim, 41(188).
Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Methods and Applications. In: Springer-Verlag., Berlin Heidelberg.
Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Al-Haiqi, A., Kiah, M. L. M., Hussain, M., & Abdulnabi, M. (2015). Evaluation and selection of open-source EMR software packages based on integrated AHP and TOPSIS. Journal of biomedical informatics, 53, 390-404.
Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Al-Haiqi, A., Kiah, M. L. M., Hussain, M., & Abdulnabi, M. (2015). Evaluation and selection of open-source EMR software packages based on integrated AHP and TOPSIS. Journal of biomedical informatics, 53, 390-404.
Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Albahri, O. S., Alsalem, M. A., Albahri, A. S., Yas, Q. M., & Hashim, M. (2018). A review on smartphone skin cancer diagnosis apps in evaluation and benchmarking: coherent taxonomy, open issues and recommendation pathway solution. Health and Technology. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-018-0223-9. doi:10.1007/s12553-018-0223-9
Zaidan, B., & Zaidan, A. (2017). Software and hardware FPGA-based digital watermarking and steganography approaches: Toward new methodology for evaluation and benchmarking using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, 26(07), 1750116.
Zaidan, B., Zaidan, A., Abdul Karim, H., & Ahmad, N. (2017). A new approach based on multi-dimensional evaluation and benchmarking for data hiding techniques. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 1-42.
Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2009). Multi-attribute decision-making model by applying grey numbers. Informatica, 20(2), 305-320.
Zha, R. (2019). Improving the usability of mobile application user review collection.
Zhang, J., Sung, Y.-T., Hou, H.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2014). The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education, 73, 178-188.
Zhao, H., Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2018). Comprehensive benefit evaluation of eco-industrial parks by employing the best-worst method based on circular economy and sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(3), 1229-1253.
Zionts, S. (1979). MCDM—if not a roman numeral, then what? Interfaces, 9(4), 94-101.
LIST OF PUBLICATION
Published and Accepted Papers
• GA Alshafeey et. al, 2019, Augmented Reality for the Disabled: Review Articles. Journal of ICT in Education 1, 46-57,
• GA Alshafeey et. al, 2014, DESKTOP VIRTUALISATION AS A TOOL TO SUPPORT IT VIRTUAL TEAM, Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur Research Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014).
• MA Chyad, HA Alsattar, BB Zaidan, AA Zaidan, GA Al Shafeey , The Landscape of Research on Skin Detectors: Coherent Taxonomy, Open Challenges, Motivations, Recommendations and Statistical Analysis, Future Directions , IEEE Access 7, 106536-106575.
• AH Alamoodi, BB Zaidan, AA Zaidan, SM Samuri, AR Ismail, O Zughoul, A review of data analysis for early-childhood period: taxonomy, motivations, challenges, recommendation, and methodological aspects , IEEE Access 7, 51069- 51103.
• OS Albahri, AS Albahri, AA Zaidan, BB Zaidan, MA Alsalem, AH Mohsin, Faulttolerant mHealth framework in the context of IoT-based real-time wearable health data sensors , IEEE Access 7, 50052-50080.
• AS Albahri, OS Albahri, AA Zaidan, BB Zaidan, M Hashim, MA Alsalem, Based multiple heterogeneous wearable sensors: A smart real-time health monitoring structured for hospitals distributor , IEEE Access 7, 37269-37323.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |