UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Studies have shown that, despite its many advantages, the use of mobile based assessment
(MBA) in educational institutions has some limitations. As such, this study was carried out to
propose an acceptance model to determine factors that might influence students‘
acceptance of mobile based assessment based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),
which is a highly valid technology acceptance model. Essentially, the proposed model
consists of six constructs, namely intention, usefulness, ease of use, enjoyment, content
assessment, and navigation system. A panel consisting of 21 experts used the Delphi
method to validate the proposed model. Also, a sample study consisting of 90
undergraduates were given survey questionnaires to collect data for further analysis using the
Structural Equation Modeling method. The findings showed usefulness, ease of use, and
enjoyment had significant relationships with students‘ intention to use such an
assessment. Likewise, content assessment had significant relationships with usefulness,
ease of use, and enjoyment. The findings also showed the navigation system had significant
relationships with ease of use and enjoyment. Overall, these findings suggest
that motivational factors, including content assessment and navigation system, play
an important role in influencing students‘ acceptance of mobile based
assessment. In summation, these findings can serve as a guideline to help all the stakeholders to
take into account all the above factors for the successful implementation of mobile based
assessment in educational institutions. Further studies can be carried out by focusing
on other important psychological factors, such as trust and anxiety.
|
References |
Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors influencing students‘ acceptance of m- learning: An investigation in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(5).
Al-Emran, M., & Salloum, S. A. (2017). Students' Attitudes Towards the Use of Mobile Technologies in e-Evaluation. iJIM, 11(5), 195-202.
Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M., & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93-102.
Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014, August). Mobile learning-system usage: An integrated framework to measure students' behavioural intention. In Science and Information Conference (SAI), 2014 (pp. 906-911). IEEE.
Aliev, A. N., & Gümrükçüoglu, A. E. (2004). Gravitational field equations on and off a 3-brane world. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 21(22), 5081.
Alioon, Y., & Delialioğlu, Ö. (2017). The effect of authentic m‐ learning activities on student engagement and motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology
Almaiah, M. A. (2018). Acceptance and usage of a mobile information system services in University of Jordan. Education and Information Technologies, 1- 23.
Almaiah, M. A., & Al Mulhem, A. (2018). Analysis of the essential factors affecting of intention to use of mobile learning applications: A comparison between universities adopters and non-adopters. Education and Information Technologies, 1-36.
Almaiah, M. A., & Al Mulhem, A. (2019). Analysis of the essential factors affecting of intention to use of mobile learning applications: A comparison between universities adopters and non-adopters. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1433-1468.
Almaiah, M. A., & Alismaiel, O. A. (2019). Examination of factors influencing the use of mobile learning system: An empirical study. Education and InformationTechnologies, 24(1), 885-909.
Almaiah, M. A., Jalil, M. A., & Man, M. (2016). Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(4), 453-485.
Almaiah, M. A., Jalil, M. A., & Man, M. (2016). Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(4), 453-485.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Alrasheedi, M., & Capretz, L. F. (2013, August). A meta-analysis of critical success factors affecting mobile learning. In Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 2013 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 262-267). IEEE.
Alrasheedi, M., Capretz, L. F., & Raza, A. (2015). A systematic review of the critical factors for success of mobile learning in higher education (university students' perspective). Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(2), 257-276.
Althunibat, A. (2015). Determining the factors influencing students‘ intention to use m-learning in Jordan higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 65-71.
Avellis, G., Scaramuzzi, A., & Finkelstein, A. (2004). Evaluating non-functional requirements in mobile learning contents and multimedia educational software. Learning with mobile devices: Research and development. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
Bere, A. (2013, October). Toward assessing the impact of mobile security issues in pedagogical delivery: A mobile learning case study. In Science and Information Conference (SAI), 2013 (pp. 363-368). IEEE.
Bere, A. (2014, April). Exploring determinants for mobile learning user acceptance and use: An application of UTAUT. In Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), 2014 11th International Conference on (pp. 84-90). IEEE.
Bogdanović, Z., Barać, D., Jovanić, B., Popović, S., & Radenković, B. (2014). Evaluation of mobile assessment in a learning management system. BritishJournal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 231-244.
Briz-Ponce, L., & Juanes-Méndez, J. A. (2015). Mobile devices and apps,characteristics and current potential on learning. Journal of Information Technology Research (JITR), 8(4), 26-37.
Briz-Ponce, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Pereira, A. (2016). Effects of mobile learning in medical education: a counterfactual evaluation. Journal of medical systems, 40(6), 136.
Briz-Ponce, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., & García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2017). Learning with mobile technologies–Students‘ behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 612-620.
Briz-Ponce, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., & García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2017). Learning with mobile technologies–Students‘ behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 612-620.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International journal of testing, 1(1), 55-86.
Campbell PhD, A., & Susan, J. (2014). Performance, assessment and communication in one app: Mobile tablet assessment is here to stay. eCULTURE, 7(1), 6.
Chao, K. H., Chang, K. E., Lan, C. H., Kinshuk, & Sung, Y. T. (2016). Integration of mobile ARtechnology in performance assessment. Educational Technology & Society,19(4), 239–251.
Chaveesuk, S., Vongjaturapat, S., & Chotikakamthorn, N. (2013, October). Analysis of factors influencing the mobile technology acceptance for library information services: Conceptual model. In 2013 International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)(pp. 18-24). IEEE.
Chen, C. H. (2010). The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self-and peer- assessment system. Computers & Education, 55(1), 229-236.
Chen, C. M., & Chen, M. C. (2009). Mobile formative assessment tool based on data mining techniques for supporting web-based learning. Computers & Education, 52(1), 256-273.
Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., & Huang, Y. C. (2013). The integration of print and digital content for providing learners with constructive feedback usingsmartphones. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 837-845.
Chen, W., Gu, X., & Wong, L. H. (2017). To click or not to click: Effectiveness ofrating classroom behaviors on academic achievement with tablets. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Cheng, Y. M. (2015). Towards an understanding of the factors affecting m-learning acceptance: 20(3), 109-119.
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054-1064.
Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of retailing, 77(4), 511-535.
Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution. MIS quarterly, 237-246.
Chou, P. N., Chang, C. C., & Lin, C. H. (2017). BYOD or not: A comparison of two assessment strategies for student learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 63-71.
Chu, H. C. (2014). Potential negative effects of mobile learning on students' learning achievement and cognitive load—A format assessment perspective. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 332-344.
Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618-1627.
Chung, H. H., Chen, S. C., & Kuo, M. H. (2015). A study of EFL college students‘ acceptance of mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 333-339.
Coulby, C., Hennessey, S., Davies, N., & Fuller, R. (2011). The use of mobile technology for work‐ based assessment: the student experience. British Journal ofEducational Technology, 42(2), 251-265.
Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Gregory, K. H. (2017). The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 110, 51-63.
Crompton, H., Burke, D., Gregory, K. H., & Gräbe, C. (2016). The use of mobilelearning in science: A systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 149-160.
Dalby, D., & Swan, M. (2018). Using digital technology to enhance formative assessment in mathematics classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
Dearnley, C., Haigh, J., & Fairhall, J. (2008). Using mobile technologies for assessment and learning in practice settings: a case study. Nurse education in practice, 8(3), 197-204.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research, 3-33.
de-Marcos, L., Hilera, J. R., Barchino, R., Jiménez, L., Martínez, J. J., Gutiérrez, J. A., & Otón, S. (2010). An experiment for improving student‘s performance in secondary and tertiary education by means of m-learning auto- assessment. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1069-1079.
Fazlina, S., Manap, A. A., & Rias, R. M. (2013, September). Mobile learning awareness Creative Multimedia (ICICM), 2013 International Conference on (pp. 226-229). IEEE.
Fernández-Alemán, J. L., Lopez-Gonzalez, L., Gonzalez-Sequeros, O., Jayne, C., López-Jiménez, J. J., & Toval, A. (2016). The evaluation of i-SIDRA–a tool for intelligent feedback–in a course on the anatomy of the locomotor system. International journal of medical informatics, 94, 172-181.
Fuad, M., Deb, D., Etim, J., & Gloster, C. (2018). Mobile response system: a novel approach to interactive and hands-on activity in the classroom. EducationalTechnology Research and Development, 66(2), 493-514.
García Laborda, J. G., Magal-Royo, T. M., Litzler, M. F., & Giménez López, J. L. G.(2014). Mobile phones for Spain's university entrance examination language test.
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & García-Holgado, A. (2017, October). TEEM 2017 Doctoral Consortium Track. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (p. 93). ACM.
Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18-26.
Gu, X., Gu, F., & Laffey, J. M. (2011). Designing a mobile system for lifelong learning on the move. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 204-215.
Ha, I., Yoon, Y., & Choi, M. (2007). Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & management, 44(3), 276-286.
Hao, S., Dennen, V. P., & Mei, L. (2017). Influential factors for mobile learning acceptance among Chinese users. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 101-123.
Harchay, A., Cheniti-Belcadhi, L., & Braham, R. (2015). A Context-aware Approach for Personalized Mobile Self-Assessment. J. UCS, 21(8), 1061-1085.
Harchay, A., Cheniti-Belcadhi, L., & Braham, R. (2017, October). MobiSWAP: Personalized Mobile Assessment Tool Based on Semantic Web and Web Services. In 2017 IEEE/ACS 14th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) (pp. 1406-1413). IEEE.
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of marketing, 60(3), 50-68.
Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling:Concepts, issues, and applications. Sage.
Huang, C. Y. (2012, November). A comparison of fuzzy DNP and SEM in analyzing novel mobile learning technology acceptances by learners. In Fuzzy Theory and it's Applications (iFUZZY), 2012 International Conference on (pp. 119-124). IEEE.
Huang, Y. M., Lin, Y. T., & Cheng, S. C. (2009). An adaptive testing system forsupporting versatile educational assessment. Computers & Education, 52(1), 53-67. Human Behavior, 27(2), 890e898.
Hung, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Lin, Y. F., Wu, T. H., & Su, I. H. (2013). Seamless connection between learning and assessment-applying progressive learning tasks in mobile ecology inquiry. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 194-205.
Hung, P. H., Lin, Y. F., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). Formative assessment design for PDA integrated ecology observation. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 33-42.
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031.
Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., & Maragahh, H. (1995). Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Information & management, 29(5), 227- 238.
Illingworth, A. J., Morelli, N. A., Scott, J. C., & Boyd, S. L. (2015). Internet-based, unproctored assessments on mobile and non-mobile devices: Usage, measurement equivalence, and outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 325-343.
Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition (pp. 1-50). The New Media Consortium.
Karadeniz, Ş. (2009). The impacts of paper, web and mobile based assessment on student‘s achievement and perceptions. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(10), 984-991.
Karadeniz, S. (2011). Effects of gender and test anxiety on student achievement in mobile based assessment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3173- 3178.
Khalifa, M., & Ning Shen, K. (2008). Explaining the adoption of transactional B2C mobile commerce. Journal of enterprise information management, 21(2), 110- 124.
Kim, B., Choi, M., & Han, I. (2009). User behaviors toward mobile data services: The role of perceived fee and prior experience. Expert Systems withApplications, 36(4), 8528-8536.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematicliterature reviews in software engineering.
Kuh, G. D., Jankowski, N., Ikenberry, S. O., & Kinzie, J. L. (2014). Knowing what students know and can do: The current state of student learning outcomes assessment in US colleges and universities. Champaign, IL: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Laborda, J. G., Royo, T. M., Litzler, M. F., & López, J. L. G. (2014). Mobile phones for Spain's university entrance examination language test. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 17-30.
Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to improving students' art design performance using handheld devices. Computers & Education, 85, 149-159.
Lai, C. L., Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. H. (2018). The effects of computer-supported self- regulation in science inquiry on learning outcomes, learning processes, and self-efficacy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1-30.
Lam, L. (2015, July). A Qualitative Study to Understand the Factors Influencing Student Acceptance of Mobile Learning. In Educational Technology (ISET), 2015 International Symposium on (pp. 158-162). IEEE.
Lee, M. K., Cheung, C. M., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & management, 42(8), 1095-1104.
Lee, Y. E., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Interface design for mobile commerce. Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 48-52.
Liu, Y., & Li, H. (2011). Exploring the impact of use context on mobile hedonic services adoption: An empirical study on mobile gaming in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 890-898.
Looi, C. K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2011). 1: 1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: A study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 269-287.
Lu, A., Chen, Q., Zhang, Y., & Chang, T. (2016, December). Investigating the Determinants of Mobile Learning Acceptance in Higher Education Based on UTAUT. In 2016 International Computer Symposium (ICS) (pp. 651-655).IEEE.
Lu, Q., Yu, Y., Ma, Q., Chen, B., & Zhang, H. (2016). 2D transition‐ metal‐ dichalcogenide‐ nanosheet‐ based composites for photocatalytic and electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reactions. Advanced Materials, 28(10), 1917-1933.
Mac Callum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2014). Comparing the role of ICT literacy and anxiety in the adoption of mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 8-19.
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81-95.
Merhi, M. I. (2015). Factors influencing higher education students to adopt podcast: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 83, 32-43.
Milošević, I., Živković, D., Manasijević, D., & Nikolić, D. (2015). The effects of the intended behavior of students in the use of M-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 207-215.
Miyasawa, Y., & Ueno, M. (2013, July). Mobile testing for authentic assessment in the field. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 619-623). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Nedungadi, P., & Raman, R. (2012). A new approach to personalization: integrating e-learning and m-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(4), 659-678.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2014, November). A model for MBA adoption based on Self-Determination Theory of Motivation. In Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL), 2014 International Conference on (pp. 86-90). IEEE.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2015, November). The effects of perceived mobility and satisfaction on the adoption of MBA. In Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL), 2015 International Conference on (pp. 167-171). IEEE.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2016). An outdoor MBA activity: Measuring students' motivation and acceptance. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 10(4), 11-17.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2016). The impact of paper-based, computer- based and mobile-based self-assessment on students' science motivation andt. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1241-1248.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). MBA: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of Self-Determination Theory and Technology Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 83-95.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). MBA: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use. Computers & Education, 109, 56-73.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017, April). MBA: Towards a motivational framework. In 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1522-1526). IEEE.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2019). Factors that influence behavioral intention to use mobile‐ based assessment: A STEM teachers‘ perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 587-600.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). MBA: A literature review of publications in major referred journals from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 125, 101-119.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile‐ Based micro‐ Learning and Assessment: Impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 269-278.
Nikou, S., & Economides, A. A. (2013). Student achievement in paper, computer/web and mobile based assessment.
Nitsche, K. (2013, July). Acceptance of mobile, classroom-bound e-Learning systems from the perspective of students and lectures. In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on (pp. 508- 509). IEEE.
Norazah, M. N., Ridzwan, C. R., & Arif, A. A. (2013). Relationship between the acceptance of mobile learning for AutoCAD course and learning style in polytechnic. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 177-187.
Ozdamli, F. (2012). Pedagogical framework of m-learning. Procedia-Social andBehavioral Sciences, 31, 927-931.
Park, E., Baek, S., Ohm, J., & Chang, H. J. (2014). Determinants of player acceptance of mobile social network games: An application of extended technologyacceptance model. Telematics and Informatics, 31(1), 3-15.
Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students' behavioralintention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592-605.
Paturusi, S., Chisaki, Y., Usagawa, T., & Lumenta, A. (2015, September). A study of students' acceptance toward mobile learning in higher education institution in Indonesia. In 2015 International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and Systems (ICTS) (pp. 193-196). IEEE.
Pimmer, C., Mateescu, M., & Gröhbiel, U. (2016). Mobile and ubiquitous learning in higher education settings. A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 490-501.
Poong, Y. S., Yamaguchi, S., & Takada, J. I. (2017). Investigating the drivers of mobile learning acceptance among young adults in the World Heritage town of Luang Prabang, Laos. Information Development, 33(1), 57-71.
Pu, Y. H., Wu, T. T., Chiu, P. S., & Huang, Y. M. (2016). The design and implementation of authentic learning with mobile technology in vocational nursing practice course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(3), 494-509.
Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Bhanot, R., Estrella, G., Penuel, B., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S. (2010). Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: impact on students‘ mathematics learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 399-419.
Rossing, J. P., Miller, W., Cecil, A. K., & Stamper, S. E. (2012). iLearning: The future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets.
Sabah, N. M. (2016). Exploring students' awareness and perceptions: Influencing factors and individual differences driving m-learning adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 522-533.
Salkind, N. J., & Rasmussen, K. (2007). Kruskal-Wallis One-Way Analysis of Variance. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, 2, 519-521.
Samaie, M., Mansouri Nejad, A., & Qaracholloo, M. (2018). An inquiry into the efficiency of WhatsApp for self‐ and peer‐ assessments of oral language proficiency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 111-126.
Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016).Informal tools in formal contexts: Development of a model to assess theacceptance of mobile technologies among teachers. Computers in HumanBehavior, 55, 519-528.
Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 644-654.
Santos, P., Hernández-Leo, D., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Blat, J. (2012). Modeling the computing-based testing domain extending IMS QTI: Framework, models and exemplary implementations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1648- 1662.
Santos, P., PéRez-SanagustíN, M., HernáNdez-Leo, D., & Blat, J. (2011). QuesTInSitu: From tests to routes for assessment in situ activities. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2517-2534.
Sarrab, M. (2015). M-learning in education: Omani Undergraduate students‘ perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 834-839.
Sarrab, M., Al-Shihi, H., & Khan, A. I. (2015, December). An empirical analysis of mobile learning (m-learning) awareness and acceptance in higher education. In Computing and Network Communications (CoCoNet), 2015 International Conference on (pp. 960-963). IEEE.
Sharma, S. K., Sarrab, M., & Al-Shihi, H. (2017). Development and validation of Mobile Learning Acceptance Measure. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7), 847-858.
Shee, D. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e- learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers & Education, 50(3), 894-905.
So, S. (2016). Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 32-42.
Song, Y., & Kong, S. C. (2017). RETRACTED: Affordances and constraints of BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) for learning and teaching in higher education: Teachers' perspectives.
Stowell, J. R. (2015). Use of clickers vs. mobile devices for classroompolling. Computers & Education, 82, 329-334.
Sun, J. C. Y. (2014). Influence of polling technologies on student engagement: An analysis of student motivation, academic performance, and brainwave data. Computers & Education, 72, 80-89.
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta- analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.
Tamboli, M. A., & Biswas, P. K. (2015, October). Mobile Learning Applications' Acceptance Model (MLAAM). In Computing and Communication (IEMCON), 2015 International Conference and Workshop on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Tan, G. W. H., Ooi, K. B., Leong, L. Y., & Lin, B. (2014). Predicting the drivers of behavioral intention to use mobile learning: A hybrid SEM-Neural Networks approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 198-213.
Tarighat, S., & Khodabakhsh, S. (2016). Mobile-assisted language assessment: Assessing speaking. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 409-413.
Teo, T. S., Lim, V. K., & Lai, R. Y. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. Omega, 27(1), 25-37.
Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2011). The acceptance and use of computer-based assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1032-1044.
Tucker, S. P. (2008). E-commerce standard user interface: an E-menu system. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(8), 1009-1028.
Valencia, S. W., Martin, S. D., Place, N. A., & Grossman, P. (2009). Complex interactions in student teaching: Lost opportunities for learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 304-322.
Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS quarterly, 695-704.
van der Schaaf, M., Donkers, J., Slof, B., Moonen-van Loon, J., van Tartwijk, J., Driessen, E., & Ten Cate, O. (2017). Improving workplace-based assessment and feedback by an E-portfolio enhanced with learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 359-380.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Wang, A. I. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217-227.
Zbick, J., Nake, I., Milrad, M., & Jansen, M. (2015, July). A web-based framework to design and deploy mobile learning activities: Evaluating its usability, learnability and acceptance. In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on (pp. 88-92). IEEE.
Zhai, X., Zhang, M., & Li, M. (2018). One‐ to‐ one mobile technology in high school physics classrooms: Understanding its use and outcome. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 516-532.
Zhang, J., Chang, C., & Zhou, P. (2015, October). Factors affecting the acceptance of mobile devices in the classroom. In Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), 2015 International Conference of (pp. 294-298). IEEE.
Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers & Education, 94, 1-17.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |