UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran
(Integration Self Learning Module – Modul InSeL) bagi pelajar matrikulasi.
Pembangunan modul ini berdasarkan Teori Pembelajaran Kognitif, pembinaan konsep
Matematik, kemahiran berfikir dan pembelajaran kendiri. Pembangunan modul
menggunakan Model Sidek melibatkan dua peringkat iaitu membina draf modul dan
pengujian modul. Kajian reka bentuk dan pembangunan (DDR) ini menggunakan tiga
set soal selidik untuk menilai kesahan, kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian modul.
Instrumen penilaian telah disahkan oleh dua orang pakar dengan nilai pekali
kebolehpercayaan Alfa Cronbach bagi instrumen kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian
ialah 0.93 dan 0.92 yang dibuat melalui ujian rintis. Kesahan kandungan terhadap
Modul InSeL dibuat oleh tujuh orang pakar yang dilantik dan nilai kesahan ditentukan
melalui indeks kesahan kandungan (CVI). Nilai keseluruhan indeks kesahan
kandungan Modul InSeL adalah tinggi iaitu 0.99 atau 99 peratus bagi kedua-dua nilai
CVI bagi item (I-CVI) dan CVI bagi skala (S-CVI). Seramai 73 orang pelajar matrikulasi
terlibat dalam kajian ini bagi menguji kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian modul yang
dibangunkan. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan nilai pekali Alfa Cronbach bagi
kebolehpercayaan Modul InSeL adalah memuaskan iaitu 0.775. Hasil daripada
analisis soal selidik tahap kesesuaian menunjukkan Modul InSeL mencapai tahap
peratus persetujuan yang tinggi iaitu melebihi 90% dengan min bagi ketiga-tiga
konstruk iaitu isi kandungan (3.43), format persembahan (3.49) dan sumber rujukan
(3.38). Ini menunjukkan secara keseluruhan Modul InSeL telah memenuhi piawaian
sesuatu modul dari aspek kandungan dan kualiti modul. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini
berjaya menghasilkan satu Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Matematik bagi topik
Pengamiran bagi pelajar matrikulasi yang menepati keperluan silibus yang telah
ditetapkan. Implikasinya, Modul InSeL membolehkan pelajar mempelajari topik
Pengamiran secara kendiri. |
References |
Abdu-Raheem, B. O. (2014). Improvisation of instruction- al materials for teaching and learning in secondary schools as predictor of high academic standard. Nigerian Journal of Social Studies, 17(1), 131-143.
Adel, A. M., & Kurniawati, Y. (2018). Phase Design Development Of Calculus 2 Module Based Inquiry In Fkip Ummy Solok. Proceeding IAIN Batusangkar, 2nd International Seminar on Education 2017 Empowering Local Wisdom on Education for Global Issue1(2), 31-34.
Amalia, M., & Sidek, M. N. (2013). An application of the Sidek module development in Rebt counseling intervention module design for orphans. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1481-1491.
Amani, D. (2014). Pembangunan modul m-pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Institut Pendidikan Guru (Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya).
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R., et al (Eds..) (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group)
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
Andriani, A., Dewi, I., & Halomoan, B. (2018). Development of Mathematics Learning Strategy Module, Based on Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) To Improve Mathematic Communication And Self Efficacy On Students Mathematics Department. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 970, 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/970/1/012028
Arango, J., Gaviria, D., & Valencia, A. (2015). Differential calculus teaching through virtual learning objects in the field of management sciences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 412-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.490
Ariefiani, Z., Kustono, D., & Pathmantara, S. (2016, October). Module development with project-based learning approach and assure development model. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1778, No. 1, p. 030036). AIP Publishing LLC.
Arsyad, N., Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2017). Developing a self-learning model based on open-ended questions to increase the students’ creativity in calculus. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 19(2), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.26858/gjeev19i2y2017p143147
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.
Bahagian Matrikulasi, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020).
Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Pelajaran, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020).
Baheiraei, A., Khoori, E., Ahmadi, F., Foroushani, A. R., Ghofranipour, F., & Weiler, R. M. (2013). Psychometric properties of the adolescent health concern inventory: the Persian version. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 8(1), 28–36.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay, 20, 24.
Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2014). Instructional design models. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 77-87). Springer, New York, NY.
Bressoud, D., Ghedamsi, I., Martinez-Luaces, V., & Törner, G. (2016). Teaching and Learning of Calculus (ICME-13 Topical Surveys) (1st ed. 2016 ed.). Springer.
Calucag, L. S. Self-Paced Instruction and Mathematics Achievement.
Carter, J. D., Helliwell, D., Henrich, A., Principe, M., & Sloughter, J. M. (2015). Improving Student Success in Calculus at Seattle University. PRIMUS, 26(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1067264
Chaudhary, N., Kumar, S. & Shankar, G. (2007). Experiences in Sharing of Printed Instructional Materials for Distance Learning. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 16(3), 254-266. Indira Gandhi National Open University. Retrieved September 1, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/187787/.
Charles, M., & Saikumar, N. (2018). Impact of concept mapping and modular learning techniques on pupils‟ achievement for the selected topics in mathematics. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 649-657.
Chen, F. M. (2016). Modular Approach to Introduce Multivariate Calculus in Thermodynamics Class. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, 63(5), 445– 449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.201500539
Chew, E. S., Abd Hamid, M. A., & Madar, A. R. (2017). Conceptual framework for designing and developing a creativity enhancement module in education incorporating indigenous perspectives. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 25(S), 67-82.
Chiek, P. O., & Zaidatun, T. (2015). Self-instructional module based on cognitive load theory: a study on information retention among trainee teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9383-8
Clayton M. Edwards. (2013). Self-Paced Mathematical Instruction. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 19(4), 230. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.19.4.0230
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. routledge.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
Connelly, L. M. (2008). Pilot studies. Medsurg Nursing, 17(6), 411.
Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2018). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research plus MyLab Education with Enhanced Pearson eText -- ... New in Ed Psych / Tests & Measurements) (6th ed.). Pearson.
Curry, J. H., Johnson, S., & Peacock, R. (2020). Robert Gagné and the Systematic Design of Instruction. Design for Learning.
Crawford, P., Moseley, D., Nancarrow, M., & Ward, E. (2018). Calculus Challenges: An Active Learning Approach. PRIMUS, 28(6), 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1387630
Dane, A., Çetin, Ö. F., Bas, F., & Özturan Sağırlı, M. (2016). A Conceptual and Procedural Research on the Hierarchical Structure of Mathematics Emerging in the Minds of University Students: An Example of Limit-Continuity-Integral- Derivative. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n2p82
Darwazeh, A. N., & Branch, R. M. (2015). “A revision to the revised Bloom’s taxonomy”. A Proceedings paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Educational Communications and Technology (Vol. 2), Indianapolis, IN.
Daza, V., Makriyannis, N., & Rovira Riera, C. (2013). MOOC attack: closing the gap between pre-university and university mathematics. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.872558
Dey, N., & Chaudhary, S. V. S. (2016). The Perception of B. Ed. Students on Printed Self-Learning Material and Learning Style in ODL.
Devesh, S., & Nasseri, D. A. (2014). Effectiveness of Mathematics Module in Foundation Programme in Majan College. International Journal of Emerging Engineering Research and Technology, 2(1), 1-7.
DeVon, H. A., Block ,M. E., Moyle-Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J. & Lazzara, D. J., A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007; 39 (2): 155-64.
Dhamija, N., & Kanchan. (2014). Effectiveness of Self Learning Modules on the Achievement and Retention of Undergraduate Students in Commerce Educationia Confab 3 26-32.
Dick, W., & Carey, L., (2001). The Systemic Design of Instruction. United State: Addison - Wesley Educational Publishers Inc
Dolnicar, S., Grun, B., Leisch, F., & Rossiter, J. (2011). Three good reasons NOT to use five and seven point Likert items.
Durán, A.J., Pérez, M., & Varona, J.L. (2014). The Misfortunes of a Trio of Mathematicians Using Computer Algebra Systems. Can We Trust in Them? Notices of the AMS, 61(10), 1249-1252. Available at: http://www.ams.org/notices/201410/rnoti-p1249.pdf https://doi.org/10.1090/noti1173
Effandi, Z., Johari, M. Y., Mistima, S. M., & Mazlini, A. (2010). Conceptual knowledge and mathematics achievement of matriculation students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1020–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.279
Effandi , Z., & Salwani, T. S. (2015). Using Technology in Learning Integral Calculus. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 144. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s1p144
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance improvement quarterly, 26(2), 43-71.
Ferrer, P. F. (2016). Investigating Students’ Learning Difficulties In Integral Calculus. People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2016.s21.310324
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). Internal validity. How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 166-83.
Gagne, R. M. (1974). Educational technology and the learning process. Educational Researcher, 3(1), 3-8.
Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction (Subsequent ed.). Wadsworth Pub Co.
Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Goals, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Publishers.
Ghazali, D., & Sufean, H. (2016). Research Methodology in Education. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Publisher.
Norhashidah, M. G., Effendi, E. M. M., & Norasmah, O. (2019). Pengujian Ciri-Ciri Psikometrik Instrumen Penilaian Nilai dan Etika dalam Kalangan Guru Menggunakan Model Rasch. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 21-36.
Gilbert, G. E., & Prion, S. (2016). Making sense of methods and measurement: Lawshe's Content Validity Index. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(12), 530- 531.
Go Silk, C.J., Go Silk, B.B. & Somblingo, R.A. (2017). Modular Approach in Teaching Problem Solving: A Metacognitive Process. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Volume 6 Issue 8, August 2017. Doi: 10.21275/ART20175782
Gonzales, E. E. (2015). A Modular Approach Utilizing Decision Tree in Teaching Integration Techniques in Calculus. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(3), 52-58.
Gore, S., Goldberg, A., Huang, M. H., Shoemaker, M., & Blackwood, J. (2019). Development and validation of a quality appraisal tool for validity studies (QAVALS). Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 1-9.
Hair, J.F.Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th Edition. United States of America: Pearson Education Limited.
Hamidah, M. (2019). Development and Effect of Integrated Science Process Skills Module Towards Higher Order Thinking Skills Based on Edutainment. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(2), 919–931.
Hashemi, N., Abu, M. S., Kashefi, H., Mokhtar, M., & Rahimi, K. (2015). Designing Learning Strategy toImprove Undergraduate Students’ Problem Solving in Derivatives and Integrals: A Conceptual Framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1318a
Hatch, D. K., Mardock-Uman, N., & Nelson, M. J. (2017). Content Validation of the Community College Student Success Program Inventory. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 42(6), 439–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2017.1323694
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D. and Smaldino, S.E. (2008). Instructional media and technologies for learning , Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hiebert, J. & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and Procedura/ Knowledge in Mathematics: An Introductory Analysis (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Hiebert, J. & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed)., Handbooks for research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65 -97). New York: MacMillan.
Hoban, R. A. (2018). A resource for introducing students to the integral concept. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(4), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2018.1480809
Hong, D. S., Choi, K. M., Hwang, J., & Runnalls, C. (2017). Integral Students’ Experiences: Measuring Instructional Quality and Instructors’ Challenges in Calculus 1 Lessons. International Journal Of Research In Education And Science, 424. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.327901
Hsu, J., Hamilton, K., & Wang, J. (2015). Guided independent learning: a teaching and learning approach for adult learners. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 17(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijil.2015.066103
Huang. C. H. (2015). “Calculus Students’ Visual Thinking of Definite Integral.” American Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 3, No. 4: 476-482. doi: 10.12691/education-3-4-14.
Huang, C. H. (2013). Engineering students’ visual thinking of the concept of definite integral. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 15(2), 111-117.
Istikomah, E. (2020). Module Of Ict-Based Learning Mathematics: Response Of Students In The Learning Process. Jurnal Pajar (Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 4(3), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v4i3.7992
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of applied psychology, 78(2), 306.
Jayaram, K. & Dorababu, K. K. (2015). “Self learning materials in distance education system”, International Journal of Current Research, 7, (10), 21929-21934.
Jazim, Anwar, R. B., & Rahmawati, D. (2017). The Use of Mathematical Module Based on Constructivism Approach as Media to Implant the Concept of Algebra Operation. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 579-583.
Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial Scale Development: Sample Size for Pilot Studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394– 400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692
Jones, S. R. (2013) Understanding the integral: Students’ symbolic forms. J. Math. Behav., 32, 122–141.
Josep Figueroa-Cañas & Teresa Sancho-Vinuesa (2018): Investigating the relationship between optional quizzes and final exam performance in a fully asynchronous online calculus module, Interactive Learning Environments, DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1559864
Kalthom, H., Puziah, A. W., Faeez, M. I., Amin, M. N., Izzudin, M. P. & Fariza, H.M. (2017, September). Learning Management System Towards Learner's Independent Learning. In 2nd International Conference on Education, Science, and Technology (ICEST 2017). Atlantis Press.
Karakus, F., & Aydin, B. (2017). The Effects of Computer Algebra System on Undergraduate Students' Spatial Visualization Skills in a Calculus Course. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(3), 54-69.
Karjanto, N. (2013). Calculus teaching and learning in South Korea. Jurnal Matematika Integratif, 9(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmi.v9.n2.10194.179-193
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2018).
Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2015
Kouropatov, A. & Dreyfus, T. (2013) Constructing the integral concept on the basis of the idea of accumulation: Suggestion for a high school curriculum. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., 44, 641–651.
Kouvela, E., Hernandez-Martinez, P., & Croft, T. (2017). “This is what you need to be learning”: an analysis of messages received by first-year mathematics students during their transition to university. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(2), 165–183.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0226-2
Lasmiyati, L., & Harta, I. (2014). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Minat SMP. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 161-174.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
Li, Y. W. (2016). Transforming Conventional Teaching Classroom to Learner-Centred Teaching Classroom Using Multimedia-Mediated Learning Module. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.667
Liang, L., Yeung, K., Lui, R. K. W., Cheung, W. M. Y., & Lam, K. F. (2018). Lessons Learned from a Calculus E-Learning System for First-Year University Students with Diverse Mathematics Backgrounds. In Distance Learning, E-Learning and Blended Learning in Mathematics Education (pp. 69-92). Springer, Cham.
Lim, E.J.A. (2016). Effectiveness of Modular Instruction in Word Problem Solving of BEED Students. IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM), Volume 12, Issue 5 Ver. VII (Sep. - Oct.2016), pp 59-65. Doi: 10.9790/5728-1205075965
Lindell, M. K., Brandt, C. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1999). A revised index of interrater agreement for multi-item ratings of a single target. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23(2), 127-135.
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382– 385.
Maciejewski, W., & Star, J. R. (2016). Developing flexible procedural knowledge in undergraduate calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2016.1148626
Mahir, N. (2009). Conceptual and procedural performance of undergraduate students in integration. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802213591
Maisurah, S., Balqis, M., Norazah, U., & Fadzilawani, A. A. (2015). Mathematical errors in advanced calculus: A survey among engineering students. Esteem Academic Journal, 11(2), 37-44.
Mantiri, F. (2014). Multimedia and Technology in Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(9), 589-592.
Mary Anne, S. P., & Leong, K. E. (2014). Teaching and Learning Calculus in Secondary Schools with the TI-Nspire. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 27-33.
McGriff, S. J. (2000). Instructional system design (ISD): Using the ADDIE model. Retrieved June, 10(2003), 513-553.
Mei, C. A., Kok, W. N., Halimah, B. Z., Azlina, A., & Azizah, J. (2016, October). Enhancing calculus learning via a student-centred web project. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1775, No. 1, p. 030101). AIP Publishing LLC.
Mendezabal, M. J., & Tindowen, D. J. (2018). Improving students’ attitude, conceptual understanding and procedural skills in differential calculus through Microsoft mathematics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 385. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.356
Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2018). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (12th Edition) (12th ed.). Pearson.
Mohamad Ariffin, A. B., & Norulhuda, I. (2020). Development, Validity, And Reliability Of Meta-Seller Tutoring Module. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 5(2), 123-127.
Mohd Afifi, B.S., Nor’ain, M. T., Mazlini, A., & Ikhwan, M. M. S. (2017). Adventure Based Learning Module: Content Validity and Reliability Process. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 2222- 6990.
Mohd Afifi, B.S., Nor’ain, M. T., & Mazlini, A. (2018). Basics Statistics Critical Thinking Test: Reliability and Validity Issues. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 5(1), 1-15.
Mohd Effendi, E. M. M., & Zamri, A. K. (2015). Assessing the Content Validity of IKBAR using Content Validity Ratio. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(7), 255-257.
Mohd Effendi, E.M.M., Hisyamsani, I., Normawati, A.R., & Zamri A.K. (2017). Kesahan Kandungan Pakar Instrumen Ikbar Bagi Pengukuran Aq Menggunakan Nisbah Kesahan Kandungan. Proceeding of International Conference On Global Education V (ICGE V), “Global Education, Common Wealth and Cultural Adversity”; pp. 979 - 997
Mohd Nazri, H., Ramlee, M., Azimah, N. Y., & Rosnidar, M. (2017). Pembangunan Modul Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi di dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains Sekolah Rendah: Analisis Keperluan Guru. Sains Humanika, 9(1–5), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-5.1185
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2010). Designing effective instruction . Retrieved October 23, 2012.
Moses, P., Wong, S.L., Bakar, K.A., & Mahmud, R. (2013). Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use: antecedents of attitude towards laptop use among science and mathematics teachers in Malaysia. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(3), 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0054-9
Murni, D., Helma, & Mirna. (2019). Validity and practicality of calculus teaching materials based on integrated ict contextual problems to improve students problem solving skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, 012131. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012131
Muzangwa, J., & Chifamba, P. (2012). Analysis of error and misconceptions in the learning of Calculus by undergraduate students. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 5(2).
Nardo, M. T. B. (2017). Modular instruction enhances learner autonomy. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1024-1034.
Nasibah, U. I. M. & Nazipah.(2015). Model ADDIE dalam proses rekabentuk modul pengajaran Bahasa Arab tujuan khas di USM sebagai contoh.
Ndlazi, N. J. (2015). First-year engineering students' concept development of integral calculus at a South African university of technology (Doctoral dissertation).
Nik Azis Nik Pa. (2014). Pengembangan Nilai Dalam Pendidikan Matematik dan Sains. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.
Norah. M. N., Nurul I. H., & Radhiah. A. R. (2013). "The framework for learning using video based on cognitive load theory among visual learners," 2013 IEEE 5th Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kuala Lumpur, pp. 15-20, doi: 10.1109/ICEED.2013.6908295.
Norazman, A., Sazelli, A. G., & Firdaus, M. H. (2014, June). Teaching calculus using module based on cooperative learning strategy. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1602, No. 1, pp. 497-501). American Institute of Physics.
Nor Jannah, H., & Norshidah, M. S. (2017). Development and Assessment of the Usability of Mathematical Teaching Module for Visually Impaired Fourth Year Students. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling, 2(5), 54-69.
Nooriza, K., & Effandi, Z. (2015). Integrasi kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik: Analisis keperluan guru.[Integrating high-level thinking skills in teaching and learning mathematics: An analysis of teacher needs]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 3(1), 1-12.
Nugent, W., Sieppert, J., & Hudson, W. (2001). Practice evaluation fot the 21st century. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole
Nur Liyana, M. I., Aziz, M. S. M. A., & Nasir, M. B. (2014). Analisis Kesahan Kandungan Modul Penyesuaian Pemikiran Kerjaya (PPK) Berdasarkan Pendekatan Teori Cognitive Information Processing (CIP). JPBU Vol. 7
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), 489-497.
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 30(4), 459-467.
Pramuditya, S. A., Sulaiman, H. & Wahyudin. (2019) Development of instructional media game education on integral and differential calculus. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1280, No. 4, p. 042049). IOP Publishing.
Prendergast, M., Spassiani, N. A., & Roche, J. (2017). Developing a Mathematics Module for Students with Intellectual Disability in Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(3), 169. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n3p169
Rabiatul, A. A., & Rohani, A. T. (2015). Pre-University Students’difficulties In Problem Solving By Using Q-Methodology (1-11). Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 5(2), 1-11.
Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2017). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy and integral calculus: unpacking the knowledge dimension. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(8), 1206–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2017.1321796
Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2018). Students’ mathematical performance, metacognitive experiences and metacognitive skills in relation to integral-area relationships. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 38(2), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hry006
Ramadhana, R., & Hadi, A. (2018). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Learning Cycle 7E dengan pendekatan saintifik. Equals, 1(1), 45-52.
Razali, N., Othman, H., Zainuri, N. A., Hamzah, F. M., Asshaari, I., Ariff, F. H. M. & Nopiah, Z. M. (2016). Modern or Traditional Teaching Strategy In Learning Engineering Mathematics Course. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Special Issue on PEKA 2016, November (2016) 13 - 20
Reddy, L. (2018). Unit-5 Designing Self-Learning Materials. IGNOU.
Richland, L.E., Stigler, J.W., & Holyoak, K.J. (2012). Teaching the conceptual structure of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.667065
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02961473
Richey, R.C., & Klein, J.D. (2007). Design and developmental research. New York, NY : Routledge.
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1102-1118). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.014
Rossett, A. (1987). Training needs assessment. Educational Technology.
Russell, J. D. (1974). Modular Instruction. Minneapolis, Minn.: Burgest Publishing Co.
Sadiq, S. & Zamir, S. (2014). Effectiveness of Modular Approach in teaching at University level. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(17), 103-110.
Salazar, D. A. (2014). Salazar’s Grouping Method: Effects on Students’ Achievement in Integral Calculus. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(15), 119-126.
Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y.E. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course: A Case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 142. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.3.142
Santia, I. 2017. The Development of Mathematics Module Based On Relational Thinking. Education Emission of FKIP University of Jember. Vol. 6, Issue 4, pp 49-58.
Sari, D. P., & Surya, E. (2017). Development the module of mathematics statistics1 by using the model of dick and carey design. International journal of sciences: basic and applied research (IJSBAR), 34(1).
Sattar, M. R., Rose, A. A. R., Haryanti, M. A., & Azlin, N. M. (2017). Using QR-Code in a green technology module to foster motivation and independent learning. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 22(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijil.2017.10006918
Sazilah, S., & Faizal, N. L. A. (2017). Development and evaluation of form three mathematics i-Think module (Mi-T3) on algebraic formulae topic. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1847, No. 1, p. 030017). AIP Publishing LLC.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective sixth edition. Pearson.
Seah, E. K. (2005). Analysis of students’ difficulties in solving integration problems. The Mathematics Educator, 9(1), 39-59.
Sealey, V. (2014) A framework for characterizing student understanding of Riemann sums and definite integrals. J. Math. Behav., 33, 230–245.
Seel, N. M., Lehmann, T., Blumschein, P., & Podolskiy, O. A. (2017). Instructional Design for Learning: Theoretical Foundations. SensePublishers.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach (7th ed.). Wiley.
Sevimli, E. (2016). Do calculus students demand technology integration into learning environment? case of instructional differences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0038-6
Shaheen, S and Khatoon, S. (2017). Impact of ICT Enriched Modular Approach on Academic Achievement of Biology Students. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, Vol 11(1), 49-59.
Shelton, T. (2016). Injecting Inquiry-Oriented Modules into Calculus. PRIMUS, 27(7), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1211205
Shephard, K. (2003). Questioning, promoting and evaluating the use of streaming video to support student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 295-308.
Shodikin, A., & Novianti, A. (2017). Design of Animated Subject Materials in Integral Calculus Course. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(3), 294-298.
Sholihah, U., & Maryono, M. (2020). Students’ visual thinking ability in solving the integral problem. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.10286
Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2008). Pembangunan Modul Bagaimana Membina Modul Latihan dan Modul Akademik (Vol. 2). Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching 77, 20 – 26.
Skemp, R. R. (2006). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 12(2), 88-95.
Schindler, P. S., & Cooper, D. R. (2006). Marketing research. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Suastika, I. K., & Wahyuningtyas, D. T. (2020). Inquiry-based E-module for Geometry Learning Subject. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080130
Suastika, I K., Triwahyuningtyas, D. (2016). The Importance of Developing Learning Module of Numbers in Primary Schools. Proceedings: National Seminar on "Building Lecturers Character as a Researcher and a Devotee in Entering the Global Competition".Malang August 6th, 2016 at the University of Malang Kanjuruhan
Šumonja, S., Veličković, V., & Šubarević, T. (2015). Applying ICT in the teaching of mathematics in high school. IMVI Open Mathematical Education Notes, 5(1), 31-46. Available at: http://oaji.net/articles/2015/484-1423741289.pdf
Sunismi, S., & Fathani, A. H. (2018). Pengembangan E-Module Kalkulus I Sebagai Panduan Mahasiswa Untuk Mengoptimalkan Individual Learning. JPM : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v1i2.820
Suryani, A. I., Anwar, Hajidin, & Rofiki, I. (2020). The practicality of mathematics learning module on triangles using GeoGebra. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470, 012079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012079
Suryanto (2014). Kesalahan pemahaman konsep Matematik dan pengaruhnya terhadap kegagalan belajar. Articel of education, Vocasional Education Developement Center Malang, 315.
Syahrir, S., Syazali, M., Masykur, R., Amrulloh, M. A., Sada, H. J., & Listiani, B. (2018). Calculus Module for Derivative Application Materials with an Islamic Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach. IOP Conference Series: Journal of Physics, 1155. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012079
Syamsulaini, S., & Mashitoh, H. (2016). Pengajaran berasaskan video dalam pembelajaran berpusatkan pelajar: analisis dan kajian kritikal. Journal of ICT in Education, 3, 24-33.
Talwanga, M. (2014). Transition between Secondary and University Mathematics. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 2219-2219.
Tasman, F., & Ahmad, D. (2018). Visualizing Volume to Help Students Understand the Disk Method on Calculus Integral Course. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335, 012112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757- 899x/335/1/012112
Tinsley, H. E., & Weiss, D. J. (1975). Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22(4), 358.
Tin, A. C., & Wah, L. L. (2017). Instrumen Penilaian Kualiti Untuk Modul Pengajaran: Pengujian Ciri Psikometrik. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 4(4), 25-43.
Ulhusna, M., Diana Putri, S., & Zakirman. (2019). Validity of integrated calculus module two stay two stray learning model for use in communities independent learning groups. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 314, 012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/314/1/012061
Vandenbussche, J., Ritter, L., & Scherrer, C. (2018). An incentivized early remediation program in Calculus I. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(8), 1235–1249. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2018.1458340
Vasanti, G., & Vinod Kumar, V. (2016). Harnessing the Power of Active Learning based Engineering Mathematics Module. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(40), 40. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i40/102964
Vijayaragavan, K., Singh, P., Wason, M., & Sangeetha, V. (2018). Self-Learning Modules for Enhancing the Efficiency of Extension Personnel. Journal of Global Communication, 11(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-2442.2018.00015.0
Voon, L. L., Julaihi, N. H., & Tang, H. E. (2017). Misconceptions and errors in learning integral calculus. Asian Journal of University Education AJUE), 13(1), 17-39.
Wade, Carol H.; Sonnert, Gerhard; Sadler, Philip M.; Hazari, Zahra; and Watson, Cherrie, "Acomparison of Mathematics Teachers' and Professors' Views on Secondary Preparation for Tertiary Calculus" (2016). Education and Human Development Faculty Publications. 27
Wewe, M. (2020). The Profile of Students’ Learning Difficulties in Concepts Mastery in Calculus Course. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 3(2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v3i2.6421
Widodo, A. (2005). Taksonomi Tujuan Pembelajaran. Didaktis. 4(2), 61-69.
Widyastuti, E., & Susiana. (2019). Using the ADDIE model to develop learning material for actuarial mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188, 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012052
Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl–Bloom’s taxonomy revised. Understanding the New Version of Bloom's Taxonomy.
Yap, W. L., Neo, M., & Neo, T. K. (2016). The impact of the role of teacher and balance of power in transforming conventional teaching to learner-centered teaching in Malaysian institution of higher education. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(4), 1849–1868
Yulastri, A., Hidayat, H., Ganefri, G., Edya, F., & Islami, S. (2018). Learning outcomes with the application of product based entrepreneurship module in vocational higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 8(2), 120-131.
Yusni, Y. M., Melati, S., Fatanah, M., Shahriza, S., Ibrahim, M. K. A., & Ridhuan, M. M. J. (2018). The needs analysis in self-concept module development. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 44-55.
Zulkefly, M., Othman, L., & Shahrizal, S. (2017). Pembinaan dan Penilaian Instrumen Ujian Aptitud Kemasukan ke Institut Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 5, 16-27. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol5.2.2017
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |