UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :QA Mathematics
Main Author :Khairulazuad Husain
Title :Pembangunan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran (InSel) bagi pelajar matrikulasi
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :2021
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran (Integration Self Learning Module – Modul InSeL) bagi pelajar matrikulasi. Pembangunan modul ini berdasarkan Teori Pembelajaran Kognitif, pembinaan konsep Matematik, kemahiran berfikir dan pembelajaran kendiri. Pembangunan modul menggunakan Model Sidek melibatkan dua peringkat iaitu membina draf modul dan pengujian modul. Kajian reka bentuk dan pembangunan (DDR) ini menggunakan tiga set soal selidik untuk menilai kesahan, kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian modul. Instrumen penilaian telah disahkan oleh dua orang pakar dengan nilai pekali kebolehpercayaan Alfa Cronbach bagi instrumen kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian ialah 0.93 dan 0.92 yang dibuat melalui ujian rintis. Kesahan kandungan terhadap Modul InSeL dibuat oleh tujuh orang pakar yang dilantik dan nilai kesahan ditentukan melalui indeks kesahan kandungan (CVI). Nilai keseluruhan indeks kesahan kandungan Modul InSeL adalah tinggi iaitu 0.99 atau 99 peratus bagi kedua-dua nilai CVI bagi item (I-CVI) dan CVI bagi skala (S-CVI). Seramai 73 orang pelajar matrikulasi terlibat dalam kajian ini bagi menguji kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian modul yang dibangunkan. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan nilai pekali Alfa Cronbach bagi kebolehpercayaan Modul InSeL adalah memuaskan iaitu 0.775. Hasil daripada analisis soal selidik tahap kesesuaian menunjukkan Modul InSeL mencapai tahap peratus persetujuan yang tinggi iaitu melebihi 90% dengan min bagi ketiga-tiga konstruk iaitu isi kandungan (3.43), format persembahan (3.49) dan sumber rujukan (3.38). Ini menunjukkan secara keseluruhan Modul InSeL telah memenuhi piawaian sesuatu modul dari aspek kandungan dan kualiti modul. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini berjaya menghasilkan satu Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Matematik bagi topik Pengamiran bagi pelajar matrikulasi yang menepati keperluan silibus yang telah ditetapkan. Implikasinya, Modul InSeL membolehkan pelajar mempelajari topik Pengamiran secara kendiri.

References

Abdu-Raheem, B. O. (2014). Improvisation of instruction- al materials for teaching and

learning in secondary schools as predictor of high academic standard. Nigerian

Journal of Social Studies, 17(1), 131-143.

 

Adel, A. M., & Kurniawati, Y. (2018). Phase Design Development Of Calculus 2 Module

Based Inquiry In Fkip Ummy Solok. Proceeding IAIN Batusangkar, 2nd

International Seminar on Education 2017 Empowering Local Wisdom on

Education for Global Issue1(2), 31-34.

 

Amalia, M., & Sidek, M. N. (2013). An application of the Sidek module development in

Rebt counseling intervention module design for orphans. Procedia-Social and

Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1481-1491.

 

Amani, D. (2014). Pembangunan modul m-pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Institut

Pendidikan Guru (Doctoral dissertation, University of Malaya).

 

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R., et al (Eds..) (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning,

Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational

Objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group)

 

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E.,

Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and

Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New

York: Longman.

 

Andriani, A., Dewi, I., & Halomoan, B. (2018). Development of Mathematics Learning

Strategy Module, Based on Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) To Improve

Mathematic Communication And Self Efficacy On Students Mathematics

Department. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 970, 012028.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/970/1/012028

 

Arango, J., Gaviria, D., & Valencia, A. (2015). Differential calculus teaching through

virtual learning objects in the field of management sciences. Procedia-Social

and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 412-418.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.490

 

Ariefiani, Z., Kustono, D., & Pathmantara, S. (2016, October). Module development

with project-based learning approach and assure development model. In AIP

Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1778, No. 1, p. 030036). AIP Publishing LLC.

 

Arsyad, N., Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2017). Developing a self-learning model

based on open-ended questions to increase the students’ creativity in calculus.

Global Journal of Engineering Education, 19(2), 143–147.

https://doi.org/10.26858/gjeev19i2y2017p143147

 

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in

education. Cengage Learning.

 

Bahagian Matrikulasi, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020).

 

Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Pelajaran, Kementerian Pendidikan

Malaysia. (2020).

 

Baheiraei, A., Khoori, E., Ahmadi, F., Foroushani, A. R., Ghofranipour, F., & Weiler, R.

M. (2013). Psychometric properties of the adolescent health concern inventory:

the Persian version. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 8(1), 28–36.

 

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive

domain. New York: McKay, 20, 24.

 

Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2014). Instructional design models. In Handbook of

research on educational communications and technology (pp. 77-87).

Springer, New York, NY.

 

Bressoud, D., Ghedamsi, I., Martinez-Luaces, V., & Törner, G. (2016). Teaching and

Learning of Calculus (ICME-13 Topical Surveys) (1st ed. 2016 ed.). Springer.

 

Calucag, L. S. Self-Paced Instruction and Mathematics Achievement.

 

Carter, J. D., Helliwell, D., Henrich, A., Principe, M., & Sloughter, J. M. (2015).

Improving Student Success in Calculus at Seattle University. PRIMUS, 26(2),

105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1067264

 

Chaudhary, N., Kumar, S. & Shankar, G. (2007). Experiences in Sharing of Printed

Instructional Materials for Distance Learning. Indian Journal of Open Learning,

16(3), 254-266. Indira Gandhi National Open University. Retrieved September

1, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/187787/.

 

Charles, M., & Saikumar, N. (2018). Impact of concept mapping and modular learning

techniques on pupils‟ achievement for the selected topics in

mathematics. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 649-657.

 

Chen, F. M. (2016). Modular Approach to Introduce Multivariate Calculus in

Thermodynamics Class. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, 63(5), 445–

449. https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.201500539

 

Chew, E. S., Abd Hamid, M. A., & Madar, A. R. (2017). Conceptual framework for

designing and developing a creativity enhancement module in education

incorporating indigenous perspectives. Pertanika Journal of Social Science

and Humanities, 25(S), 67-82.

 

Chiek, P. O., & Zaidatun, T. (2015). Self-instructional module based on cognitive load

theory: a study on information retention among trainee teachers. Educational

Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 499–515.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9383-8

 

Clayton M. Edwards. (2013). Self-Paced Mathematical Instruction. Mathematics

Teaching in the Middle School, 19(4), 230.

https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.19.4.0230

 

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education.

routledge.

 

Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and

psychological measurement, 20(1), 37-46.

 

Connelly, L. M. (2008). Pilot studies. Medsurg Nursing, 17(6), 411.

 

Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive

function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in

Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63-68.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001

 

Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2018). Educational Research: Planning,

Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research plus MyLab

Education with Enhanced Pearson eText -- ... New in Ed Psych / Tests &

Measurements) (6th ed.). Pearson.

 

Curry, J. H., Johnson, S., & Peacock, R. (2020). Robert Gagné and the Systematic

Design of Instruction. Design for Learning.

 

Crawford, P., Moseley, D., Nancarrow, M., & Ward, E. (2018). Calculus Challenges:

An Active Learning Approach. PRIMUS, 28(6), 616–625.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1387630

 

Dane, A., Çetin, Ö. F., Bas, F., & Özturan Sağırlı, M. (2016). A Conceptual and

Procedural Research on the Hierarchical Structure of Mathematics Emerging

in the Minds of University Students: An Example of Limit-Continuity-Integral-

Derivative. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 82–91.

https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n2p82

 

Darwazeh, A. N., & Branch, R. M. (2015). “A revision to the revised Bloom’s taxonomy”.

A Proceedings paper presented at the annual meeting of the American

Association for Educational Communications and Technology (Vol. 2),

Indianapolis, IN.

 

Daza, V., Makriyannis, N., & Rovira Riera, C. (2013). MOOC attack: closing the gap

between pre-university and university mathematics. Open Learning: The

Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28(3), 227–238.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.872558

 

Dey, N., & Chaudhary, S. V. S. (2016). The Perception of B. Ed. Students on Printed

Self-Learning Material and Learning Style in ODL.

 

Devesh, S., & Nasseri, D. A. (2014). Effectiveness of Mathematics Module in

Foundation Programme in Majan College. International Journal of Emerging

Engineering Research and Technology, 2(1), 1-7.

 

DeVon, H. A., Block ,M. E., Moyle-Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J. & Lazzara,

D. J., A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh

2007; 39 (2): 155-64.

 

Dhamija, N., & Kanchan. (2014). Effectiveness of Self Learning Modules on the

Achievement and Retention of Undergraduate Students in Commerce

Educationia Confab 3 26-32.

 

Dick, W., & Carey, L., (2001). The Systemic Design of Instruction.

United State: Addison - Wesley Educational Publishers Inc

 

Dolnicar, S., Grun, B., Leisch, F., & Rossiter, J. (2011). Three good reasons NOT to

use five and seven point Likert items.

 

Durán, A.J., Pérez, M., & Varona, J.L. (2014). The Misfortunes of a Trio of

Mathematicians Using Computer Algebra Systems. Can We Trust in Them?

Notices of the AMS, 61(10), 1249-1252. Available at:

http://www.ams.org/notices/201410/rnoti-p1249.pdf

https://doi.org/10.1090/noti1173

 

Effandi, Z., Johari, M. Y., Mistima, S. M., & Mazlini, A. (2010). Conceptual knowledge

and mathematics achievement of matriculation students. Procedia - Social and

Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1020–1024.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.279

 

Effandi , Z., & Salwani, T. S. (2015). Using Technology in Learning Integral Calculus.

Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 144.

https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s1p144

 

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism:

Comparing critical features from an instructional design

perspective. Performance improvement quarterly, 26(2), 43-71.

 

Ferrer, P. F. (2016). Investigating Students’ Learning Difficulties In Integral Calculus.

People: International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 310–324.

https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2016.s21.310324

 

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). Internal validity. How to design

and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 166-83.

 

Gagne, R. M. (1974). Educational technology and the learning process. Educational

Researcher, 3(1), 3-8.

 

Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction

(Subsequent ed.). Wadsworth Pub Co.

 

Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Goals, K. C., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of

instructional design (5th ed.). CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Publishers.

 

Ghazali, D., & Sufean, H. (2016). Research Methodology in Education. Kuala Lumpur:

University of Malaya Publisher.

 

Norhashidah, M. G., Effendi, E. M. M., & Norasmah, O. (2019). Pengujian Ciri-Ciri

Psikometrik Instrumen Penilaian Nilai dan Etika dalam Kalangan Guru

Menggunakan Model Rasch. International Journal of Education and

Pedagogy, 1(1), 21-36.

 

Gilbert, G. E., & Prion, S. (2016). Making sense of methods and measurement:

Lawshe's Content Validity Index. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(12), 530-

531.

 

Go Silk, C.J., Go Silk, B.B. & Somblingo, R.A. (2017). Modular Approach in Teaching

Problem Solving: A Metacognitive Process. International Journal of Science

and Research (IJSR), Volume 6 Issue 8, August 2017. Doi:

10.21275/ART20175782

 

Gonzales, E. E. (2015). A Modular Approach Utilizing Decision Tree in Teaching

Integration Techniques in Calculus. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary

Research, 3(3), 52-58.

 

Gore, S., Goldberg, A., Huang, M. H., Shoemaker, M., & Blackwood, J. (2019).

Development and validation of a quality appraisal tool for validity studies

(QAVALS). Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 1-9.

 

Hair, J.F.Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2014). Multivariate Data

Analysis. 7th Edition. United States of America: Pearson Education Limited.

 

Hamidah, M. (2019). Development and Effect of Integrated Science Process Skills

Module Towards Higher Order Thinking Skills Based on Edutainment.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,

9(2), 919–931.

 

Hashemi, N., Abu, M. S., Kashefi, H., Mokhtar, M., & Rahimi, K. (2015). Designing

Learning Strategy toImprove Undergraduate Students’ Problem Solving in

Derivatives and Integrals: A Conceptual Framework. EURASIA Journal of

Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 219–230.

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1318a

 

Hatch, D. K., Mardock-Uman, N., & Nelson, M. J. (2017). Content Validation of the

Community College Student Success Program Inventory. Community College

Journal of Research and Practice, 42(6), 439–444.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2017.1323694

 

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D. and Smaldino, S.E. (2008). Instructional

media and technologies for learning , Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

 

Hiebert, J. & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and Procedura/ Knowledge in

Mathematics: An Introductory Analysis (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

 

Hiebert, J. & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D.

Grouws (Ed)., Handbooks for research in mathematics teaching and learning

(pp. 65 -97). New York: MacMillan.

 

Hoban, R. A. (2018). A resource for introducing students to the integral concept.

International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,

50(4), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2018.1480809

 

Hong, D. S., Choi, K. M., Hwang, J., & Runnalls, C. (2017). Integral Students’

Experiences: Measuring Instructional Quality and Instructors’ Challenges in

Calculus 1 Lessons. International Journal Of Research In Education And

Science, 424. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.327901

 

Hsu, J., Hamilton, K., & Wang, J. (2015). Guided independent learning: a teaching and

learning approach for adult learners. International Journal of Innovation and

Learning, 17(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijil.2015.066103

 

Huang. C. H. (2015). “Calculus Students’ Visual Thinking of Definite Integral.”

American Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 3, No. 4: 476-482. doi:

10.12691/education-3-4-14.

 

Huang, C. H. (2013). Engineering students’ visual thinking of the concept of definite

integral. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 15(2), 111-117.

 

Istikomah, E. (2020). Module Of Ict-Based Learning Mathematics: Response Of

Students In The Learning Process. Jurnal Pajar (Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran),

4(3), 569–578. https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v4i3.7992

 

James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group

interrater agreement. Journal of applied psychology, 78(2), 306.

 

Jayaram, K. & Dorababu, K. K. (2015). “Self learning materials in distance education

system”, International Journal of Current Research, 7, (10), 21929-21934.

 

Jazim, Anwar, R. B., & Rahmawati, D. (2017). The Use of Mathematical Module Based

on Constructivism Approach as Media to Implant the Concept of Algebra

Operation. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3),

579-583.

 

Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial Scale Development: Sample Size for Pilot

Studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394–

400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692

 

Jones, S. R. (2013) Understanding the integral: Students’ symbolic forms. J. Math.

Behav., 32, 122–141.

 

Josep Figueroa-Cañas & Teresa Sancho-Vinuesa (2018): Investigating the

relationship between optional quizzes and final exam performance in a fully

asynchronous online calculus module, Interactive Learning Environments, DOI:

10.1080/10494820.2018.1559864

 

Kalthom, H., Puziah, A. W., Faeez, M. I., Amin, M. N., Izzudin, M. P. & Fariza, H.M.

(2017, September). Learning Management System Towards Learner's

Independent Learning. In 2nd International Conference on Education, Science,

and Technology (ICEST 2017). Atlantis Press.

 

Karakus, F., & Aydin, B. (2017). The Effects of Computer Algebra System on

Undergraduate Students' Spatial Visualization Skills in a Calculus

Course. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(3), 54-69.

 

Karjanto, N. (2013). Calculus teaching and learning in South Korea. Jurnal Matematika

Integratif, 9(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmi.v9.n2.10194.179-193

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2018).

 

Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional

design models for effective instruction. Advances in Physiology Education,

40(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2015

 

Kouropatov, A. & Dreyfus, T. (2013) Constructing the integral concept on the basis of

the idea of accumulation: Suggestion for a high school curriculum. Int. J. Math.

Educ. Sci. Technol., 44, 641–651.

 

Kouvela, E., Hernandez-Martinez, P., & Croft, T. (2017). “This is what you need to be

learning”: an analysis of messages received by first-year mathematics students

during their transition to university. Mathematics Education Research Journal,

30(2), 165–183.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0226-2

 

Lasmiyati, L., & Harta, I. (2014). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran untuk

Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Minat SMP. Pythagoras: Jurnal

Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 161-174.

 

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel

psychology, 28(4), 563-575.

 

Li, Y. W. (2016). Transforming Conventional Teaching Classroom to Learner-Centred

Teaching Classroom Using Multimedia-Mediated Learning Module.

International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(2), 105–112.

https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.667

 

Liang, L., Yeung, K., Lui, R. K. W., Cheung, W. M. Y., & Lam, K. F. (2018). Lessons

Learned from a Calculus E-Learning System for First-Year University Students

with Diverse Mathematics Backgrounds. In Distance Learning, E-Learning and

Blended Learning in Mathematics Education (pp. 69-92). Springer, Cham.

 

Lim, E.J.A. (2016). Effectiveness of Modular Instruction in Word Problem Solving of

BEED Students. IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM), Volume 12, Issue 5

Ver. VII (Sep. - Oct.2016), pp 59-65. Doi: 10.9790/5728-1205075965

 

Lindell, M. K., Brandt, C. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1999). A revised index of interrater

agreement for multi-item ratings of a single target. Applied Psychological

Measurement, 23(2), 127-135.

 

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing

Research, 35, 382– 385.

 

Maciejewski, W., & Star, J. R. (2016). Developing flexible procedural knowledge in

undergraduate calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(3), 299–316.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2016.1148626

 

Mahir, N. (2009). Conceptual and procedural performance of undergraduate students

in integration. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and

Technology, 40(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802213591

 

Maisurah, S., Balqis, M., Norazah, U., & Fadzilawani, A. A. (2015). Mathematical errors

in advanced calculus: A survey among engineering students. Esteem

Academic Journal, 11(2), 37-44.

 

Mantiri, F. (2014). Multimedia and Technology in Learning. Universal Journal of

Educational Research, 2(9), 589-592.

 

Mary Anne, S. P., & Leong, K. E. (2014). Teaching and Learning Calculus in

Secondary Schools with the TI-Nspire. Malaysian Online Journal of

Educational Sciences, 2(1), 27-33.

 

McGriff, S. J. (2000). Instructional system design (ISD): Using the ADDIE

model. Retrieved June, 10(2003), 513-553.

 

Mei, C. A., Kok, W. N., Halimah, B. Z., Azlina, A., & Azizah, J. (2016, October).

Enhancing calculus learning via a student-centred web project. In AIP

Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1775, No. 1, p. 030101). AIP Publishing LLC.

 

Mendezabal, M. J., & Tindowen, D. J. (2018). Improving students’ attitude, conceptual

understanding and procedural skills in differential calculus through Microsoft

mathematics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 385.

https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.356

 

Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2018). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis

and Applications (12th Edition) (12th ed.). Pearson.

 

Mohamad Ariffin, A. B., & Norulhuda, I. (2020). Development, Validity, And Reliability

Of Meta-Seller Tutoring Module. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 5(2),

123-127.

 

Mohd Afifi, B.S., Nor’ain, M. T., Mazlini, A., & Ikhwan, M. M. S. (2017). Adventure

Based Learning Module: Content Validity and Reliability Process. International

Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 2222-

6990.

 

Mohd Afifi, B.S., Nor’ain, M. T., & Mazlini, A. (2018). Basics Statistics Critical Thinking

Test: Reliability and Validity Issues. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 5(1), 1-15.

 

Mohd Effendi, E. M. M., & Zamri, A. K. (2015). Assessing the Content Validity of IKBAR

using Content Validity Ratio. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied

Sciences, 9(7), 255-257.

 

Mohd Effendi, E.M.M., Hisyamsani, I., Normawati, A.R., & Zamri A.K. (2017). Kesahan

Kandungan Pakar Instrumen Ikbar Bagi Pengukuran Aq Menggunakan Nisbah

Kesahan Kandungan. Proceeding of International Conference On Global

Education V (ICGE V), “Global Education, Common Wealth and Cultural

Adversity”; pp. 979 - 997

 

Mohd Nazri, H., Ramlee, M., Azimah, N. Y., & Rosnidar, M. (2017). Pembangunan

Modul Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi di dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains Sekolah

Rendah: Analisis Keperluan Guru. Sains Humanika, 9(1–5), 119–125.

https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-5.1185

 

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2010). Designing effective instruction .

Retrieved October 23, 2012.

 

Moses, P., Wong, S.L., Bakar, K.A., & Mahmud, R. (2013). Perceived usefulness and

perceived ease of use: antecedents of attitude towards laptop use among

science and mathematics teachers in Malaysia. The Asia-Pacific Education

Researcher, 22(3), 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0054-9

 

Murni, D., Helma, & Mirna. (2019). Validity and practicality of calculus teaching

materials based on integrated ict contextual problems to improve students

problem solving skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, 012131.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012131

 

Muzangwa, J., & Chifamba, P. (2012). Analysis of error and misconceptions in the

learning of Calculus by undergraduate students. Acta Didactica Napocensia,

5(2).

 

Nardo, M. T. B. (2017). Modular instruction enhances learner autonomy. American

Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1024-1034.

 

Nasibah, U. I. M. & Nazipah.(2015). Model ADDIE dalam proses rekabentuk modul

pengajaran Bahasa Arab tujuan khas di USM sebagai contoh.

 

Ndlazi, N. J. (2015). First-year engineering students' concept development of integral

calculus at a South African university of technology (Doctoral dissertation).

 

Nik Azis Nik Pa. (2014). Pengembangan Nilai Dalam Pendidikan Matematik dan

Sains. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.

 

Norah. M. N., Nurul I. H., & Radhiah. A. R. (2013). "The framework for learning using

video based on cognitive load theory among visual learners," 2013 IEEE 5th

Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kuala Lumpur, pp. 15-20, doi:

10.1109/ICEED.2013.6908295.

 

Norazman, A., Sazelli, A. G., & Firdaus, M. H. (2014, June). Teaching calculus using

module based on cooperative learning strategy. In AIP Conference

Proceedings (Vol. 1602, No. 1, pp. 497-501). American Institute of Physics.

 

Nor Jannah, H., & Norshidah, M. S. (2017). Development and Assessment of the

Usability of Mathematical Teaching Module for Visually Impaired Fourth Year

Students. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling,

2(5), 54-69.

 

Nooriza, K., & Effandi, Z. (2015). Integrasi kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam

pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik: Analisis keperluan guru.[Integrating

high-level thinking skills in teaching and learning mathematics: An analysis of

teacher needs]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 3(1), 1-12.

 

Nugent, W., Sieppert, J., & Hudson, W. (2001). Practice evaluation fot the 21st century.

Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole

 

Nur Liyana, M. I., Aziz, M. S. M. A., & Nasir, M. B. (2014). Analisis Kesahan Kandungan

Modul Penyesuaian Pemikiran Kerjaya (PPK) Berdasarkan Pendekatan Teori

Cognitive Information Processing (CIP). JPBU Vol. 7

 

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know

what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing &

health, 29(5), 489-497.

 

Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of

content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing &

health, 30(4), 459-467.

 

Pramuditya, S. A., Sulaiman, H. & Wahyudin. (2019) Development of instructional

media game education on integral and differential calculus. In Journal of

Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1280, No. 4, p. 042049). IOP Publishing.

 

Prendergast, M., Spassiani, N. A., & Roche, J. (2017). Developing a Mathematics

Module for Students with Intellectual Disability in Higher Education.

International Journal of Higher Education, 6(3), 169.

https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n3p169

 

Rabiatul, A. A., & Rohani, A. T. (2015). Pre-University Students’difficulties In Problem

Solving By Using Q-Methodology (1-11). Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan

Matematik Malaysia, 5(2), 1-11.

 

Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2017). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy and integral calculus:

unpacking the knowledge dimension. International Journal of Mathematical

Education in Science and Technology, 48(8), 1206–1224.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2017.1321796

 

Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2018). Students’ mathematical performance, metacognitive

experiences and metacognitive skills in relation to integral-area relationships.

Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the

IMA, 38(2), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hry006

 

Ramadhana, R., & Hadi, A. (2018). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran Matematika

Berbasis Learning Cycle 7E dengan pendekatan saintifik. Equals, 1(1), 45-52.

 

Razali, N., Othman, H., Zainuri, N. A., Hamzah, F. M., Asshaari, I., Ariff, F. H. M. &

Nopiah, Z. M. (2016). Modern or Traditional Teaching Strategy In Learning

Engineering Mathematics Course. Journal of Engineering Science and

Technology Special Issue on PEKA 2016, November (2016) 13 - 20

 

Reddy, L. (2018). Unit-5 Designing Self-Learning Materials. IGNOU.

 

Richland, L.E., Stigler, J.W., & Holyoak, K.J. (2012). Teaching the conceptual structure

of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 189-203.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.667065

 

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating

knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of

Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 23–38.

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02961473

 

Richey, R.C., & Klein, J.D. (2007). Design and developmental research. New York, NY

: Routledge.

 

Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural

knowledge in mathematics. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), Oxford

handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1102-1118). Oxford, UK: Oxford

University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.014

 

Rossett, A. (1987). Training needs assessment. Educational Technology.

 

Russell, J. D. (1974). Modular Instruction. Minneapolis, Minn.: Burgest Publishing Co.

 

Sadiq, S. & Zamir, S. (2014). Effectiveness of Modular Approach in teaching at

University level. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(17), 103-110.

 

Salazar, D. A. (2014). Salazar’s Grouping Method: Effects on Students’ Achievement

in Integral Calculus. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(15), 119-126.

 

Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y.E. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course:

A Case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 142.

Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.3.142

 

Santia, I. 2017. The Development of Mathematics Module Based On Relational

Thinking. Education Emission of FKIP University of Jember. Vol. 6, Issue 4, pp

49-58.

 

Sari, D. P., & Surya, E. (2017). Development the module of mathematics statistics1 by

using the model of dick and carey design. International journal of sciences:

basic and applied research (IJSBAR), 34(1).

 

Sattar, M. R., Rose, A. A. R., Haryanti, M. A., & Azlin, N. M. (2017). Using QR-Code

in a green technology module to foster motivation and independent learning.

International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 22(2), 177.

https://doi.org/10.1504/ijil.2017.10006918

 

Sazilah, S., & Faizal, N. L. A. (2017). Development and evaluation of form three

mathematics i-Think module (Mi-T3) on algebraic formulae topic. In AIP

Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1847, No. 1, p. 030017). AIP Publishing LLC.

 

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective sixth edition.

Pearson.

 

Seah, E. K. (2005). Analysis of students’ difficulties in solving integration

problems. The Mathematics Educator, 9(1), 39-59.

 

Sealey, V. (2014) A framework for characterizing student understanding of Riemann

sums and definite integrals. J. Math. Behav., 33, 230–245.

 

Seel, N. M., Lehmann, T., Blumschein, P., & Podolskiy, O. A. (2017). Instructional

Design for Learning: Theoretical Foundations. SensePublishers.

 

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building

Approach (7th ed.). Wiley.

 

Sevimli, E. (2016). Do calculus students demand technology integration into learning

environment? case of instructional differences. International Journal of

Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 37.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0038-6

 

Shaheen, S and Khatoon, S. (2017). Impact of ICT Enriched Modular Approach on

Academic Achievement of Biology Students. Journal of Research and

Reflections in Education, Vol 11(1), 49-59.

 

Shelton, T. (2016). Injecting Inquiry-Oriented Modules into Calculus. PRIMUS, 27(7),

669–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1211205

 

Shephard, K. (2003). Questioning, promoting and evaluating the use of streaming

video to support student learning. British Journal of Educational

Technology, 34(3), 295-308.

 

Shodikin, A., & Novianti, A. (2017). Design of Animated Subject Materials in Integral

Calculus Course. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(3), 294-298.

 

Sholihah, U., & Maryono, M. (2020). Students’ visual thinking ability in solving the

integral problem. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in

Mathematics Education), 5(2), 175–186.

https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i2.10286

 

Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2008). Pembangunan Modul Bagaimana Membina

Modul Latihan dan Modul Akademik (Vol. 2). Penerbit Universiti Putra

Malaysia.

 

Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding.

Mathematics Teaching 77, 20 – 26.

 

Skemp, R. R. (2006). Relational understanding and instrumental

understanding. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 12(2), 88-95.

 

Schindler, P. S., & Cooper, D. R. (2006). Marketing research. Tata McGraw-Hill

Education.

 

Suastika, I. K., & Wahyuningtyas, D. T. (2020). Inquiry-based E-module for Geometry

Learning Subject. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 243–248.

https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080130

 

Suastika, I K., Triwahyuningtyas, D. (2016). The Importance of Developing Learning

Module of Numbers in Primary Schools. Proceedings: National Seminar on

"Building Lecturers Character as a Researcher and a Devotee in Entering the

Global Competition".Malang August 6th, 2016 at the University of Malang

Kanjuruhan

 

Šumonja, S., Veličković, V., & Šubarević, T. (2015). Applying ICT in the teaching of

mathematics in high school. IMVI Open Mathematical Education Notes, 5(1),

31-46. Available at: http://oaji.net/articles/2015/484-1423741289.pdf

 

Sunismi, S., & Fathani, A. H. (2018). Pengembangan E-Module Kalkulus I Sebagai

Panduan Mahasiswa Untuk Mengoptimalkan Individual Learning. JPM : Jurnal

Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v1i2.820

 

Suryani, A. I., Anwar, Hajidin, & Rofiki, I. (2020). The practicality of mathematics

learning module on triangles using GeoGebra. Journal of Physics: Conference

Series, 1470, 012079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012079

 

Suryanto (2014). Kesalahan pemahaman konsep Matematik dan pengaruhnya

terhadap kegagalan belajar. Articel of education, Vocasional Education

Developement Center Malang, 315.

 

Syahrir, S., Syazali, M., Masykur, R., Amrulloh, M. A., Sada, H. J., & Listiani, B. (2018).

Calculus Module for Derivative Application Materials with an Islamic Contextual

Teaching and Learning Approach. IOP Conference Series: Journal of Physics,

1155. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012079

 

Syamsulaini, S., & Mashitoh, H. (2016). Pengajaran berasaskan video dalam

pembelajaran berpusatkan pelajar: analisis dan kajian kritikal. Journal of ICT in

Education, 3, 24-33.

 

Talwanga, M. (2014). Transition between Secondary and University Mathematics.

Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 2219-2219.

 

Tasman, F., & Ahmad, D. (2018). Visualizing Volume to Help Students Understand the

Disk Method on Calculus Integral Course. IOP Conference Series: Materials

Science and Engineering, 335, 012112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-

899x/335/1/012112

 

Tinsley, H. E., & Weiss, D. J. (1975). Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective

judgments. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22(4), 358.

 

Tin, A. C., & Wah, L. L. (2017). Instrumen Penilaian Kualiti Untuk Modul Pengajaran:

Pengujian Ciri Psikometrik. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia

Pasifik, 4(4), 25-43.

 

Ulhusna, M., Diana Putri, S., & Zakirman. (2019). Validity of integrated calculus module

two stay two stray learning model for use in communities independent learning

groups. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 314,

012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/314/1/012061

 

Vandenbussche, J., Ritter, L., & Scherrer, C. (2018). An incentivized early remediation

program in Calculus I. International Journal of Mathematical Education in

Science and Technology, 49(8), 1235–1249.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2018.1458340

 

Vasanti, G., & Vinod Kumar, V. (2016). Harnessing the Power of Active Learning based

Engineering Mathematics Module. Indian Journal of Science and Technology,

9(40), 40. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i40/102964

 

Vijayaragavan, K., Singh, P., Wason, M., & Sangeetha, V. (2018). Self-Learning

Modules for Enhancing the Efficiency of Extension Personnel. Journal of Global

Communication, 11(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-2442.2018.00015.0

 

Voon, L. L., Julaihi, N. H., & Tang, H. E. (2017). Misconceptions and errors in learning

integral calculus. Asian Journal of University Education AJUE), 13(1), 17-39.

 

Wade, Carol H.; Sonnert, Gerhard; Sadler, Philip M.; Hazari, Zahra; and Watson,

Cherrie, "Acomparison of Mathematics Teachers' and Professors' Views on

Secondary Preparation for Tertiary Calculus" (2016). Education and Human

Development Faculty Publications. 27

 

Wewe, M. (2020). The Profile of Students’ Learning Difficulties in Concepts Mastery in

Calculus Course. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 3(2), 161–168.

https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v3i2.6421

 

Widodo, A. (2005). Taksonomi Tujuan Pembelajaran. Didaktis. 4(2), 61-69.

 

Widyastuti, E., & Susiana. (2019). Using the ADDIE model to develop learning material

for actuarial mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188,

012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012052

 

Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl–Bloom’s taxonomy

revised. Understanding the New Version of Bloom's Taxonomy.

 

Yap, W. L., Neo, M., & Neo, T. K. (2016). The impact of the role of teacher and balance

of power in transforming conventional teaching to learner-centered teaching in

Malaysian institution of higher education. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences

and Humanities, 24(4), 1849–1868

 

Yulastri, A., Hidayat, H., Ganefri, G., Edya, F., & Islami, S. (2018). Learning outcomes

with the application of product based entrepreneurship module in vocational

higher education. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 8(2), 120-131.

 

Yusni, Y. M., Melati, S., Fatanah, M., Shahriza, S., Ibrahim, M. K. A., & Ridhuan, M.

M. J. (2018). The needs analysis in self-concept module development. MOJES:

Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 44-55.

 

Zulkefly, M., Othman, L., & Shahrizal, S. (2017). Pembinaan dan Penilaian Instrumen

Ujian Aptitud Kemasukan ke Institut Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. Journal of

Science and Mathematics Letters, 5, 16-27.

https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol5.2.2017

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.