UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Teaching and learning a taxation law to accounting students’ presents set of challenges to course
instructor and students. Being aware of its course natures of hybrid a conceptual and technical
knowledge structure with needed to engage with legal materials, however an inability of students
to adopt a self-directed learning style and expect the right answer from course instructor showing
that applying a modified problem-based learning would stimulate an alternative approach style in
a class. Guided with the study objective to analyse how the students constructed their knowledge
through a modified PBL would serve as a main focus. Then, Based on the analysis, the results
shows that a Taxation subject is a hierarchical knowledge structure types and to be succeeding in
this subject requires a student to acquire a high degree of conceptual and technical knowledge to
develop mastery over the procedures of investigation. Also, adopting a modified PBL in taxation
subject allows students to expand for a student progresses through the course and becomes
skilled in various procedures. The study outcomes suggest students’ knowledge acquisition and
knowledge retention of a taxation subject, using a modified PBL would improve students' skills
through their experience. This gives a lens about the student’s view validated by what was seen
in their group assessment marks. The study outcomes were benefited a course instructor for
improving pedagogical approach and conceptualizing procedure on adapting Modified PBL in
accounting legal-based subjects. |
References |
Bailar, B., Bailey, L., & Stevens, J. (1977). Measures of interviewer bias and variance. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 337–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3150772
Barrows, H, S. (1994). Problem-based Learning. Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Illinois: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique (Rev.ed.). Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Blechova,B. & Sobotovicova, S. (2015). Analysis of Tax Education in a Business School: a Case Study. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences 24(2). 113-118.
Boldt,M.N. (2001).Assessing Student's Accounting Knowledge: A Structural Approach. Journal of Education for Business, 76(5)..262-269.
Bradford, S. & Cullen, F. (2012). Research and research methods for youth practitioners. London: Routledge
Camp, G. (1996) Problem-based learning: A paradigm shift or a passing fad? Medical Education 1(1), 2-6.
Colburn, A. (2000, March). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 42-44.
Colley, K. (2008), November). Project-based science instruction: A primer. The Science Teacher, 75(3), 23-27.
Collier, D., & Mahoney, J. (1996). Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics, 49(1), 56–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/wp.1996.0023
Douglas ,S. (2012). Student engagement, problem based learning and teaching law to Business students. e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching. 6(1),33-47.
Duffrin MW. (2003). Integrating problem-based learning in an introductory college food science course. Journal of Food Science Education 2(1), 2–6.
Evans, C. (2018). Analyzing Semi-Structured Interviews Using Thematic Analysis: Exploring Voluntary Civic Participation Among Adults. London: SAGE Publishing.
Flick, U. W. E. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. London: SAGE Publishing.
Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 7(3), 385–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0
Hoadley, U., & Muller, J. (2009). Codes, pedagogy and knowledge: Advances in Bernsteinian sociology of education. In M. W. Apple, S. J. Ball, & Armando Gandin, Luis (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Education (pp. 69–78). London; New York: Routledge.
Liceaga, A. M., Ballard, T.S. and Skura, B.J. (2011). Incorporating a Modified Problem-Based Learning Exercise in a Traditional Lecture and Lab-Based Dairy Products Course. Journal of Food Science Education 10, 19-22.
Martin, F. (2003). Using a Modified based learning approach to motivate and enhance learning in taxation law. The Law Teacher, 37(1), 55-75.
Maton, K. and Muller, J. (2007). A Sociology for the Transmission of Knowledge. In Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy. Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives, ed. F. Christie and J.R. Martin, 14-33. London: Continuum.
Maton, K. (2010). Analysing knowledge claims and practices: Languages of Legitimation. In K. Maton & R. Moore (Eds.), Social Realism, Knowledge and the Society of Education: Coalitions of the Mind (pp. 35–59). London: Continuum.
Myers,L.P. (2016). Knowledge structures and their relevance for teaching and learning in introductory financial accounting. South African Journal of Accounting Research,30(1), 75-95.
Myers,L.P.(2017),An analysis of how students construct knowledge in a course with a hierarchical knowledge structure. South African Journal of Accounting Research,31(31),193-211.
Newlyn, D., & Spencer, L. (2010) Improving Student Performance in Interdisciplinary Law Unit Assessment by Providing Annotated Exemplars. Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, 3(1), 67-75.
Nor Aziah, A.M., Zuaini, I. and Wan Nordin, W.H. (2011). Application of PBL in Financial Accounting Principles Course. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI), 8, 21 –47.
Nor Aziah ,A.M., Zuaini ,I., Zahyah ,H., & Sofia, M.Y. (2013). Crafting A Good PBL Scenario in Company Secretarial Practices Course, The paper presented in The 4th International Research Symposium on Problem-Based Learning (IRSPBL).
Ramsden, P. (2005). Learning to Teach in Higher Education, 2nd ed., Routledge Falmer.
Savin-Baden, M. (2000) Understanding and using problem-based learning strategically in higher education. Paper presented to the 8th Improving Students Learning Symposium, 4-6 September, UMIST, Manchester.
Tanner, E. (2010). Legal language and the non-law research student. Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, 3(1), 77-86.
Temasek Polytechnic. (2006). PBL Foundation Programme Learning Academy, Temasek Polytechnic: Singapore.
Wee, K. N. (2004). Jump Start Authentic Problem-Based Learning. Singapore: Prentice Hall.
Torp, L., & Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-16 education (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wijnen, M., Loyens, S.M.M and Schaap,L. (2016). Experimental evidence of the relative effectiveness of problem-based learning for knowledge acquisition and retention. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8). 1907-1921 |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |