UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Facebook as one of the social networking sites has captured the attention of educators and
policy-makers as an alternative tool for language teaching and learning. The use of
Facebook made the teaching and learning process interesting for the students and had
given the students an opportunity to better understand novels. The objectives of the study
were to explore the use of Facebook in learning literature among lower secondary school
ESL students and to investigate their perception during the learning process. The study
employed both quantitative and qualitative approaches to research. This study had two
phases of investigation. The first phase involved survey-questionnaires. Meanwhile, the
second phase involved conducting a quasi-experiment and semi-structured interviews.
The subjects employed for the study were 60 lower secondary ESL school students using
purposive sampling method. The subjects, were then divided equally for the treatment
and control groups. The findings indicated that Facebook could be an effective tool in
learning a novel. The results concluded that the students could use Facebook to help them
understand a novel better. The results of the study implied that the use of Facebook is a
beneficial literature-learning tool for lower secondary ESL students. |
References |
Abraham, R. G., & Liou, H. C. (1991). Interaction generated by three computer programs: analysis of functions of spoken language. Computer-assisted language learning and testing: research issues and practice, 85-109.
Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The internet and higher education, 11(2), 71-80.
Alias, N., Siraj, S., Daud, M. K. A. M., & Hussin, Z. (2013). Effectiveness of Facebook based learning to enhance creativity among Islamic studies students by employing isman instructional design model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 60-67
Amanda, M. (2016, March 27). What Does ESL Mean? Learning English Is Important to Every ESL Student. Retrieved from https://www.verywell.com on 13/11/2017.
Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Macmillan
Anderson, R. C. (1984). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning, and memory. Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts, 29, 243-257.
Annetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M. T. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students’ engagement and learning about genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1), 74-85.
Ariogul, S. (2001). The teaching of reading through short stories in advanced classes. Unpublished MA Thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University.
Armstrong, J. & Franklin, T. (2008): “A review of current and developing international practice in the use of social networking in higher education”. Retrieved from http://franklin-consulting.co.uk/LinkedDocuments/the use of social networking in HE.pdf on 22 March 2017.
Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy. London: Kings College.
Asmah, H. O. (1987). English in Malaysia: A typology of its status and role. In Conference on Language Planning in a Multilingual Setting: The Role of English. National University, Singapore.
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of college student personnel, 25(4), 297-308.
Atherton J S (2013) Learning and Teaching; Learning and teaching system [On-line: UK] retrieved 23 December 2017 from http://www.learningandteaching.info.
Augustsson, G. (2010). Web 2.0, pedagogical support for reflexive and emotional social interaction among Swedish students. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 197-205.
Awodele, O., Idowu, S., Anjorin, O., Adedire, A., & Akpore, V. (2009). University enhancement system using a social networking approach: extending elearning. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 6(1), 269-83.
Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Baker, T.L. and A.J. Risley (1994) Doing Social Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bartlett, F. C. (1958). Thinking. An experimental and social study, New York.
Bernard, H. R. (2002). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Walnut Creek, California: Alta Mira Press.
Bicen, H., & Uzunboylu, H. (2013). The Use of Social Networking Sites in Education : A Case Study of Facebook, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(5), 658– 671,
Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(1), 17-28.
Bognar, L. (1993). Matijevic M. Didaktika, Školska knjiga, Zagreb.
Boulos, M. N. K., Maramba, I., & Wheeler, S. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC medical education, 6(1), 41.
Bowling, A. (1997). Research Methods in Health: Investigating health and health services. Buckingham. Open University Press.
Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. MacArthur foundation series on digital learning–Youth, identity, and digital media volume, 119-142.
Boyd, d. m. and Ellison, N. B. (2007), Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13: 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: a synthesis of styles. Sage Publications, Inc.
Bruning, R., Schraw, G., Norby, M., & Ronning, R. (2004). Cognitive psychology and instruction (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods. Oxford: OUP Oxford.
Buckley, S., Hasen, G., & Ainley, M. (2004). Affective engagement: A person-centred approach to understanding the structure of subjective learning experiences. Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne: Australia.
Bulger, R. E. (2002). Research with human beings. The Ethical Dimensions of the Biological and Health Sciences, 117-125.
Burke, S. C., Snyder, S., & Rager, R. C. (2009). An assessment of faculty usage of YouTube as a teaching resource. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 7(1), 8.
Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (1997). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique & utilization. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Carroli, P. (2002). Perceptions of Literature: A Comparison of Students’ and Educators’ Views. In Proceedings of Innovations in Italian teaching workshop (pp. 113-128).
Carter, R. A., & Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching literature. Essex: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
Celce-Murcia, M., & McIntosh, L. (1991). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.
Chapelle, C. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology (Vol. 7). John Benjamins Publishing.
Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222-1232.
Chen, B., & Bryer, T. (2012). Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 87-104.
Crook, C., Fisher, T., Graber, R., Harrison, C., Lewin, C., Cummings, J., & Sharples, M. (2008). Implementing Web 2.0 in secondary schools: Impacts, barriers and issues.
Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education: University connections. Routledge. New York.
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Collie, J., & Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the Language Classroom: A Resource Book of Ideas and Activities. Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1994) Research Methods in Education (fourth edition). London: Routledge
Cooper, J. (2006). Literacy: Helping children construct meaning (6th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin Company
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Dale, C., & Pymm, J. M. (2009). Podagogy The iPod as a learning technology. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 84-96.
Darmi, R., & Albion, P. (2013, July). English language in the Malaysian education system: its existence and implications. In THIRD MALAYSIAN POSTGRADUATE CONFERENCE (MPC) 2013 (p. 175).
Delanoy, W. (1997). Teacher mediation and literature learning in the language classroom. IATEFL Literature and Culture Special Interest Group Newsletter, 14, 1-9.
Dhillon, K. K., &Mogan, S. (2017). Language-based approaches to understanding literature : A creative activity module. The English Teacher, (2), 16.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
Erjavec, K. (2013). Informal learning through Facebook among Slovenian pupils. Comunicar, 21(41), 117-126.
ESL. (2016). In Urban Dictionary Online. Retrieved on 15/7/207 from http://www.urbandictionary.com.
E. Qualman. (2009). Socialnomics: How Social Media Transforms the Way We Live and Do Business. Adapted by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0- 470-47723-6. [Online]. Available: http://www.ebscohost.com/uploads/corpLearn/pdf/bbs_socialnomics.pdf
Facebook, (2013). Key facts. Facebook. http:// http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info. Retrieved on 30/7/2017.
Freeman W (2014), Taming social media in higher education classrooms. In: Proceedings for the 9th international conference on networked learning, pp 359–363.
Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Allyn & Bacon.
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2009). Role of Instructional Technology in The Transformation of Higher Education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 19-30.
Gaston, J. (2006). Reaching and teaching the digital natives. Library Hi Tech News, 23(3), 12-13.
Ghani, M. B. (2015). Using Facebook in Teaching and Learning English. In The International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture and Education (pp. 25-26).
Gonzales-Bueno, M., & Perez, L. (2000). Electronic mail in foreign language writing: A study of grammatical and lexical accuracy and quantity of language. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 189-197.
Griffith, S., & Liyanage, L. (2008). An introduction to the potential of social networking sites in education, In: Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Second Emerging Technologies Conference 2008. Australia: Wollongong.
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2001). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Sage.
Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and teacher education, 4(1), 63-69.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. JOUR.
Hall, R., & Hall, M. (2010). Scoping the pedagogic relationship between self-efficacy and Web 2.0 technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(3), 255-273.
Hamid, S., Kurnia, S., Waycott, J., & Chang, S. (2011). Exploring Malaysian students' perspectives of Online Social Networking (OSN) use for higher education. In 22nd Annual Conference ISANA International Education Association (ISANA) 2011, Hobart, Tasmania
Hamid, S., Waycott, J., Chang, S., & Kurnia, S. (2011). Appropriating online social networking (OSN) activities for higher education: Two Malaysian cases. Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart, 526-538.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social network methods and measures for examining elearning. Social networks, 2005, 1-22.
Hedge, T. (2001). Teaching and learning in the language classroom (Vol. 106). Oxford,, UK: Oxford University Press.
Heiberger, G., & Harper, R. (2008). Have you Facebooked Astin lately? Using technology to increase student involvement. New directions for student services, 2008(124), 19-35.
Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Poster presented at CSCW, Banff, Alberta, 1-2.
Higgins, S., & Moseley, D. (2001). Teachers' thinking about information and communications technology and learning: Beliefs and outcomes. Teacher development, 5(2), 191-210.
Higher Education Research Institute (2007) College freshmen and online social networking sites. Available at: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu (last accessed 7 March 2017).
Hirst, P. H., & Peters, R. S. (1970). The logic of education (Vol. 25). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Holmes, M., & Bloxham, M. (2007). An observational method for time use research: Advantages, disadvantages and lessons learned from the Middletown media studies. Conference of the International Association of Time Use Researchers. Washington, D.C.
Huang, S.J. & Liu, H.F. (2000). Communicative Language Teaching in a Multimedia Language Lab. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(2). Retrieved Jan 23, 2018, from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lee-CALLbarriers.html.
Hughes, J., & Tolley, S. (2010). Engaging students through new literacies: The good, bad and curriculum of visual essays. English in Education, 44(1), 5-26.
Hull, K. (2014). Using Facebook in the classroom. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 60-69.
Jones, N., Blackey, H., Fitzgibbon, K., & Chew, E. (2010). Get out of MySpace!. Computers & Education, 54(3), 776-782.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
Karl, K. A., & Peluchette, J. V. (2011). “Friending” professors, parents and bosses: A Facebook connection conundrum. Journal of Education for Business, 86(4), 214- 222.
Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational technology, 38(5), 20-23.
Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T. T. (2010). Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 533.
Kelner, L. B. (1993). The Creative Classroom: A Guide for Using Creative Drama in the Classroom, PreK-6. Heinemann, 361 Hanover St., Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912..
Kementerian Pelajaran (1964) 'Pusat Pengajaran Pandang Dengar (A.V.A) untuk sekolah sekolah kebangsaan', Kuala Lumpur.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2010). 2011 Primary English language curriculum.Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Dalgarno, B., & Waycott, J. (2010). Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 332-343.
Kirschner, P.A. (2002). Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 7-47). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open University of the Netherlands.
Kleiner, A. (2002). Karen Stephenson's quantum theory of trust. Strategy and Business, 54-54.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential education: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Kundu, Arnab. (2018). A Study on Indian Teachers’ Roles and Willingness to Accept Educational Technology.
Kulik, J. A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. Technology assessment in education and training, 1, 9-34.
Lantis, J. S. (2000). ‘Teaching Introductory International Relations with Cases and Analytical Exercises. The New International Studies Classroom: Active Teaching, Active Learning, edited by JS Lantis, LM Kuzma and J. Boehrer. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological review, 104(2), 211.
Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching: a guide for teachers and trainers. Cambridge University Press.
Lazar, G. (2008). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Lee, L. (2003). Perspectives of nonnative speakers of Spanish on two types of online collaborative exchanges: Promises and challenges. In L. Lomicka & J. CookePlagwitz (Eds.), Teaching with technology (pp. 221-248). Boston: Thomson & Heinle.
Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. Pew internet & American life project.
Lewis, J. & Ritchie, J., (2003). Qualitative Research Practice: A guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Sage Publications.
Li, C. S., & Irby, B. (2008). An overview of online education: Attractiveness, benefits, challenges, concerns and recommendations. College Student Journal, 42(2), 449.
Likert, R. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, Vol. 22, No. 140.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills. Lowedahl, J.M. (2011). Hype cycle for higher education 2011. Gartner research report (Retrieved from http://www85.homepage.villanova.edu/timothy.ay/DIT2160/BYOD/hype_cycle_f or_education_201_214466.pdf on 29/4/2017).
Lusk, B. (2010). Digital natives and social media behavior: an overview. The Prevention Researcher, 17(S1), 3-7.
Lyons, C. (1983,). The Relationship of Prospective Teachers' Neural Processing, Cognitive Style and Personality Type to Classroom Learning and Teaching Behaviors. In Ohio Journal of Science (Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 77-77).
Lytton, H. (1971). Observation studies of parent-child interaction: A methodological review. Child Development, 651-684.
Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university:‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141-155.
Mahmood, A.H., & Rahman , A.R.. (2002). Teknik pengajaran sastera dalam Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa 25(6), 12-17.
Mariappan, L., Abu, A. G. B., & Omar, A. B. (2017). Facebooking for a More Lively Interaction in Literature Classroom. Creative Education, 8(05), 749.
Marhan, A. M. (2006). Connectivism: Concepts and principles for emerging learning networks. In The 1 st Conference on Virtual Learning.
Marshall, C. (1991). Teachers' learning styles: How they affect student learning. The Clearing House, 64(4), 225-227.
Martinez, M., &Roser, N. L. (1991). Children's responses to literature. Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts, 2. Macmillan. New York.
Massy, William (2002, May). Distance Education: Guidelines for Good Practice. AFT, pp. 9, 16.
Mauzy, D. K. (1985). Language and language policy in Malaysia. Language policy and national unity, 151-177.
Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2009). The effects of teacher self-disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and technology, 34(2), 175-183.
Mazer, J., Murphy, R. & Simonds, C. (2007). I’ll see you on ‘Facebook’: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1–17.
Mazman, S.G. &Usluel, Y.K., (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers and Education. 55, 444-453.
McKay, S. (1982). Literature in the ESL classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 529-536.
McKenzie, D. (1985). The extraction of magma from the crust and mantle. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 74(1), 81-91.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2007, December). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007 (pp. 664-675).
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2008). The three p's of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10-27.
McRae, J. (1991). Literature with a Small ‘l’. London & Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Mehdikhani, N. (1983). The relative effects of teacher teaching style, teacher learning style, and student learning style upon student academic achievement (Doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America).
Mellon, C. A. (1999). Technology and the great pendulum of education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 28-35.
Menezes, H. (2012). Using Digital Storytelling to Improve Literacy Skills. International Association for Development of the Information Society.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.” Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Mertler, C. A., & Reinhart, R. V. (2016). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation. Routledge.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Minocha, S. (2008). A study on the effective use of social software by further and higher education in the UK to support student learning and engagement. Bristol, UK: Joint Information Systems Committee. Retrieved August 25, 2017, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/projects/effective-use-of-social-softwarein- education-finalreport.pdf.
Mitchell, R and Myles, F. (2004) Second Language Learning Theories, 2nd edition. London: Arnold; New York, distributed by Oxford University Press (chapter 2).
Ministry of Education (1989) Curriculum Specifications for English Language Form Four, Kuala Lumpur.
Nawi Ismail, (2004) Komsas & minat membaca pelajar. Pelita Bahasa. Disember, 6(12), 11-13.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd Edit.) McGraw-Hill. Hillsdale, New Jersey.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jamin, N. B. (1978). The development of educational media service in Malaysia, 1957- 1972 (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale).
O’Donoghue, J., Singh, G., & Dorward, L. (2001). Virtual education in universities: a technological imperative. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 511- 523.
Ogunnaike, J. (2002). Challenges of the teaching and learning of Literature in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Perspectives on applied linguistics in language and literature, 334-344.
Okamoto, T., Christea, A., & Kayama, M. (2001). Future integrated learning environment with multimedia. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 4-12.
Omar, H., Embi, M. A., &Yunus, M. M. (2012). ESL learners' interaction in an online discussion via Facebook. Asian Social Science, 8(11), 67.
Ondrejka, D. (2013). Affective teaching in nursing: Connecting to feelings, values, and inner awareness. Springer Publishing Company.
Oppenheim, A. N. (1992) Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement (2nd edition).London: St Martins Press.
Parkash Kaur (2000). The Teaching of Reading Skills. Unpublished Manuscript. Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn Sage. Thousand Oaks, California.
Pedagoskaenciklopedija, (1989), Zavodzaudzbenike i nastavnasredstva, Beograd.
Petrovic, N., Petrovic, D., Jeremic, V., Milenkovic, N., & Cirovic, M. (2012). Possible educational use of Facebook in higher environmental education. ICICTE 2012 proceedings, 355-362.
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Hungler, B. P. (2001). Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
Polit-O'Hara, D., & Beck, C. T. (2006). Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization (Vol. 1). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Povey, J.F. 1979. “The Teaching of Literature in Advanced ESL classes”. In L.McIntosh and M.Celce-Murcia (Eds.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Roroley, M.A.: Newbury House.
Ractham, P., & Firpo, D. (2011). Using social networking technology to enhance learning in higher education: A case study using Facebook. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
Rasiah, R. R. V. (2014). Transformative higher education teaching and learning: Using social media in a team-based learning environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 369-379.
Redecker, C. (2009). Review of Learning 2.0 Practices: Study on the Impact of Web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe, JRC Scientific and Technical Report, EUR 23664 EN: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=2059.
Reiser, R.A. (2007). A History of Instructional Design and Technology. In R. A. R. J. V.Dempsey (Ed.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Rifkin, W., Longnecker, N., Leach, J., Davis, L., & Orthia, L. (2009). Motivate students by having them publish in new media: An invitation to science lecturers to share and test. UniServe, 105.
Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and higher education, 13(3), 134-140.
Rodliyah, R. S. (2016). Using A Facebook Closed Group To Improve EFL Students’ writing. TEFLIN Journal, 27(1), 82-100.
Routman, R. (1991). Invitations: Changing as teachers and learners K-12. Toronto, Canada: Irwin Publishing.
Saettler, L. P. (2004). The evolution of American educational technology. IAP.
Sage, H. (1987). Incorporating Literature in ESL Instruction. Language in Education: Theory and Practice, No. 66. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Book Distribution Center, Route 59 at Brook Mill Drive, West Nyack, NY 10994.
Salaway, G., Caruso, J.B., & Nelson, M. R. (2007). The ECAR Study of Undergraduate of Students and Information Technology, 2007: EDUCAUSE.
San Miguel, R. (2010) Study on Facebook and Grades Becomes Learning Experience for Researcher. TechNewsWorld. http://www.technewsworld.com. Retrieved on 20/1/17.
Saraç, S. (2003). A suggested syllabus for the teaching of poetry course in ELT Departments of Turkey. Unpublished MA Thesis. Ankara: Hacettepe University.
Sbihi, B., & Kadiri, K. E. E. (2010). Towards a participatory E-learning 2.0 A new Elearning focused on learners and validation of the content. arXiv preprint arXiv:1001.4738.
Schneider N. (2010) Facebook, Other Social Network Sites Could Lead to Lower Grades for Students. http://www.associatedcontent.com. Retrieved on 20/01/17.
Schrum, L., Shelly, G., & Miller, R. (2008). Understanding tech-savvy teachers: Identifying their characteristics, motivation and challenges. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 1-20.
Schunk, D. (2004). Learning theories: An educational perspective (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Selwyn, N. (2007, October). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning-a critical review. In Paper for CERI-KERIS International Expert Meeting on ICT and Educational Performance (pp. 16-17).
Selwyn, N. (2008). An investigation of differences in undergraduates' academic use of the internet. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 11-22
Sidhu, G. K. (2003). Literature in the language classroom: Seeing through the eyes of learners. Teaching of literature in ESL/EFL contexts, 88-110.
Siegle, D. (2011). Facing Facebook: A guide for nonteens. Gifted Child Today, 34(2), 14-19.
Siemens, G. (2005) ‘Connectivism: a theory for the digital age’ International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, Vol. 2, No. 1.
Simon, M. (2011). Assumptions, limitations and delimitations. Retrieved From www.dissertationrecipes.com on 2ndJanury 2018.
Silverman D.(2000) Doing qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Taking Stock: What Does the Research Say About Technology's Impact on Education? Interview with Jay Sivin Kachala. Technology & Learning. (Online) Retrieved 24 April, 2018, from www.techlerning.com/db_area/archives/TL/062000/archives/kachala.html.
Siti Norliana, G. (2003). Learner profiles based on attitudes towards literature. MA Practicum Report. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Snell, J. (2012). Improving Teacher-Student Interaction in the EFL Classroom. Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Snell-Interaction.html on 27/1/2018.
Son, J. B. (2008). Using web-based language learning activities in the ESL classroom. International Journal of Pedagogies and learning, 4(4), 34-43.
Son, J. B. (2007). Learner experiences in web-based language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1), 21-36.
Spradley, J. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Srirat, K., (2014). Using Facebook group to facilitate teaching English for everyday communication. In The 2014 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings. June 22-25, 2014, Budapest, Hungary (pp. 5-10). Retrieved on May 22, 2017 from http://www.westeastinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Kesinee-Srirat- FullPaper.pdf.
Suriya Kumar, S. (2004). A study of the motivational factors that influence the learning of literature among upper secondary school students in Negeri Sembilan. MA Practicum Report. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Susan E. Wyse (2012). Four Main Benefits of Survey Research. Retrieved from http://www.snapsurveys.com on 27/12/2016.
Talif, R. (1995). Teaching literature in ESL: The Malaysian context. Penerbit Universiti Pertanian Malaysia.
Talif, Rosli & Mukundan, Jayakaran (1994) Using Literature in An Advantaged Situation: Issue and Prospects. Paper presented at the National Seminar on New Approaches in the Teaching of English. Online documents (http://www.melta.org.my. Retrieved on 13/11/16.)
Tay, E., & Allen, M. (2011). Designing social media into university learning: technology of collaboration or collaboration for technology? Educational Media International, 48(3), 151-163.
Technopedia (2019). Facebooking Definition. Retrieved on 19, August 2019 from https://www.techopedia.com/definition/23446/facebooking.
Terantino, J., & Graf, K. (2011). Using Facebook in the language classroom as part of the net generation curriculum. Language, 44.
Thakur, D. (2003). Teaching Language through Literature: Problems and Principles (Part 1-5). Yemen Times, 642,13. http://www.yementimes.comarticles. Retrieved on 21/12/2016.
Thaler, E. (2008). Teaching English Literature. Paderborn: Schoningh, UTB.
Timperley, H. et al. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES]. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. Available at www.educationcounts.govt. Retrieved on 24/1/17.
Usha, M.M. (Ed.) (2002), Information Management in New Millennium, Allied, New Delhi, p. 679.
Vethamani, M.E. (1991) The teaching of Literature in English In Malaysian Secondary Schools. Southeast Asian Review of English:23:p 39-51.
Vivian, R. (2011, July). University students’ informal learning practices using Facebook: help or hindrance?. In International Conference on ICT in Teaching and Learning (pp. 254-267). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
V.V.George & Adam Talib (1980). Malaysian Experience in Innovation and Utilisation of Education Media'. Paper presented at the seminar, Kuala Lumpur.
Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Westberry, N. C. (2009). An activity theory analysis of social epistemologies within tertiary-level eLearning environments (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato).
Wheeler, S., & Boulous, M.K. (2008). Mashing, Burning, Mixing and the Destructive Creativity of Web 2.0: Applications for Medical Education. Electronic Journal in Communication, Information and Innovation in Health, 1(1), 27-33.
Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Explorations in applied linguistics (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Widmayer, S. (n.d.). Schema theory: An introduction. George Mason University.
Wiese, D., & Farrugia, R. (2009). Coordinating communication on Facebook: an analysis of meaning development through close relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCA 95th Annual Convention, Chicago Hilton & Towers, Chicago, IL.
Winn, W., & Snyder, D. (1996). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 79-112.
Wittkower, W. (Ed.). (2010). Facebook and philosophy: what's on your mind? (Vol. 50). Open Court.
Wong, F. F., Lee, K. S., Lee, S. K. and Azizah, Y. (2010). English use as an identity marker among Malaysian undergraduates. 3L: Journal of Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature. Vol. 18(1), 145-155.
Wood, D. (2001), How children think and learn, London: Blackwell Publisher.
Yunus, M. M., & Salehi, H. (2012). The effectiveness of Facebook groups on teaching and improving writing: Students’ perceptions. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 1(6), 87-96.
Yusuf Hashim (1991). A study of educational media programs in Malaysian universities and colleges. University Microfilms.
Zaidieh, A. J. Y. (2012). The use of social networking in education: Challenges and opportunities. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal (WCSIT), 2(1), 18-21.
Ziegler, S. (2007) ‘The (mis)education of generation m learning. Media and Technology, 32(1), 69-81.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |