Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does Practical Work Really Work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969. doi:10.1080/09500690701749305

Ahmad, A. A., Ismail, F., Ibrahim, N. M., & Samat, N. A. (2017). Investigating the Implementation of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Malaysian Classrooms: Insights from L2 Teaching Practices. Sains Humanika, 9(4-2). doi:10.11113/sh.v9n4-2.1361

Amabile, Teresa M. (2018). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Routledge.

Amir , N., Siew, & Chong, C. L. (2015). The Perceptions of Preservice and In-service Teachers Regarding a Project-Based STEM Approach to Teaching Science. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1–20.

Andrew. (2015). World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2015.Retrieved https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2015

Ali, M., Ibrahim, N. H., Abdullah, A. H., Surif, J., Talib, C. A., & Saim, N. (2015). Web Pro-Mc Physics as a support tool for improving physics problem solving skills. 2015 Game Physics and Mechanics International Conference (GAMEPEC). doi:10.1109/gamepec.2015.7331851

Aliusta, G. O., & Özer, B. (2017). Student-Centered Teacher Roles and Student-Centered Student Roles Teacher Interview. PsycTESTS Dataset. doi:10.1037/t62222-000

Amir, N. (2015). Showcasing the Creative Talents in Science of the Academically Less-Inclined Students through a Values-Driven Toy Storytelling Project. Cases on Instructional Technology in Gifted and Talented Education Advances in Early Childhood and K-12 Education, 141-179. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6489-0.ch007

Anderson, J. C., & Naeim, F. (2012). Basic Structural Dynamics. doi:10.1002/9781118279137

Andrew. (2015) World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2015 Retrieved July 01, 2019 from https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2015

Balaji, G. (2017). Learning Styles Among Secondary School Students. Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language, 4(24). doi:10.21922/srjhsel.v4i24.10417

Barroca, A., & Soares, J. (2017). Design Thinking Mindset Applied To Education And Training. INTED2017 Proceedings. doi:10.21125/inted.2017.1988

Bottia, M. C., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R. A., Moller, S., & Valentino, L. (2015). Growing the roots of STEM majors: Female math and science high school faculty and the participation of students in STEM. Economics of Education Review, 45, 14-27. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.002

Burnard, P. (2016). Considering creative teaching in relation to creative Learning. Creative Teaching for Creative Learning in Higher Music Education, 49-62. doi:10.4324/9781315574714-5

Cardellini, L. (2012). Chemistry: Why the Subject is Difficult? Educación Química, 23, 305-310. doi:10.1016/s0187-893x(17)30158-1

Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination,Imagination and the Fires Within: Design Thinking in a Middle School Classroom. The Journal of Academic development and Education, 1.

Carroll, M. (2014). Learning from What Doesn't Work: The Power of Embracing a Prototyping Mindset. Retrieved from web.stanford.edu/group/redlab/cgi-bin/publications_resources.php

Caruso, C. (2011). The Tools of Engagement: Bridging Design Thinking and Social Media to Enhance and Support Collaborative Learning. Carleton University.

Correiro, E. E., Griffin, L. R., & Hart, P. E. (2008). A constructivist approach to inquiry-based Learning: A TUNEL assay for the detection of apoptosis in cheek cells. American Biology Teacher, 70(8), 457-460. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2008)70[457:ACATIL]2.0.CO;2

DeWitt, D., & Alias, N. (2015). The principles of learning for problems solving. Proceedings in Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan-Dekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam. Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia: Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.

Diaz, I. S., Goldhausen, I., Weise, L., Ralle, B., & Fuccia, D. D. (2018). Magic In Chemistry Class: An Activity To Foster Students' Interest. INTED2018 Proceedings. doi:10.21125/inted.2018.1246

Dillon, J. (2009). On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4, 201–213.

Eilks, I., & Hofstein, A. (2017). Curriculum Development in Science Education. Science Education, 169-181. doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_13

Elkind D: Dialogue on Early Childhood Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Medford; 1999

Ellingson, L. L. (2018). Pedagogy of Laughter: Using Humor to Make Teaching and Learning More Fun and Effective. Teaching with Sociological Imagination in Higher and Further Education, 123-134. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6725-9_8

Febriana, B., & Arlianty, W. (2017). The Application Of Authentic Assessment In Chemistry Curriculum Studies. doi:10.17501/icedu.2017.3111

Fulmer, G. W. (2013). Constraints on Conceptual Change: How Elementary Teachers' Attitudes and Understanding of Conceptual Change Relate to Changes in Students' Conceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(7), 1219-1236. doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9334-3

Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of 'context' in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 957–976

Grainger, T., Barnes, J., & Scoffham, S. (2004) A creative cocktail Creative teaching in initial teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30, 243-253.

Gurses, A., Acikyildiz, M., Dogar, C., & Sozbilir, M. (2007). An investigation into the effectiveness of problem-based Learning in a physical chemistry laboratory course. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25, 99-113

Gürses, A., Çetinkaya, S., Dogar, Ç., & Sahin, E. (2015). Determination of levels of use of basic process skills of high school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 644–650

Grainger, T., Barnes, J., & Scoffham, S. (2004). A creative cocktail: Creative teaching in initial teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30(3), 243-253. doi:10.1080/0260747042000309475

Halim, L., & Meerah, T. S. (2016). Science Education Research and Practice in Malaysia. Science Education Research and Practice in Asia, 71-93.doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0847-4_5

Hofstein, A., & Kesner, M. (2006). Industrial Chemistry and School Chemistry: Making chemistry studies more relevant. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1017-1039. doi:10.1080/09500690600702504

Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. T. (2016). Science education research and practice in Malaysia. In Science Education Research and Practice in Asia: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 71-93). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0847-4_5

Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education: a pedagogical justification and the state of the art in Israel, Germany and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1459-1483.

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1347-1362

Idris, N. B. (2019). Malaysia. Issues in Upper Secondary Science Education. doi:10.1057/9781137275967.0010

Ingram, D. D., & Ingram, D. (2020). Beautiful chemistry: Getting high school girls interested in chemistry. doi:10.1021/scimeetings.0c06149

Irwanto. (2018). Using Integrated Assessment To Measure Students' Analytical Thinking And Science Process Skills. doi:10.31227/osf.io/rjk6u

Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., Rauf, R. A. A. (2014). A Review of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999–2013: A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 155-63. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a

Jamil, S. Z., & Khairuddin, R. F. (2017). Students interest in learning science through fieldwork activity encourage critical thinking and problem solving skills among UPSI pre-university students. doi:10.1063/1.4983913

Jobst, B., Köppen, E., Lindberg, T., Moritz, J., Rhinow, H., & Meinel, C. (2012). The Faith-Factor in Design Thinking: Creative Confidence Through Education at the Design Thinking Schools Potsdam and Stanford? Design Thinking Research, 35-46. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31991-4_3

Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design Thinking: Past,Present and Possible Futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–146.

Kidman, G., & Casinader, N. (2017). Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning across Disciplines. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-53463-7

Kim, K. H., Williams, N., & Siradakis, A. (2019). Rural Creativity and Urban Creativity. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1-4. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200068-1

Kwek, D. (2011). Innovation in the Classroom: Design Thinking for 21st Century Learning.Stanford EDU,(2011). Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/group/redlab/cgi-bin/materials/Kwek-Innovation In The Classroom.pdf

Lindquist, W. P. (2001). A case study of online collaborative inquiry in an elementary classroom. PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota.

Lee, C. D. (2019). Practice that supports learning and development: A commentary. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 141-145. doi:10.1080/10888691.2019.1609735

Li, Y. (2014). International Journal of STEM Education - a platform to promote STEM education and research worldwide. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1). doi:10.1186/2196-7822-1-1

Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (2012). Preliminary Report: Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. [online] moe.gov.my. Available at: http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng.pdf .

Martin-Hansen, L. M. (2005). Crayfish investigations: Inquiry in action for grades 4-8. Science Activities, 41 (4), 3-6.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., &Stanco, G. M. (2012).TIMSS 2011 International results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College

Meyer, D. (2012) : Designing design challenges - getting the details right: using engineering problems to enact inquiry learning.Sci Teach 2012,79(2):58–62.

Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design Thinking Research. Design Thinking Research, 1-11. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21643-5_1

Ministry of Education, MOE. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint Executive Summary [Online], Available: http://www.moe.gov.my/cms/upload_files/articlefile/2013/ articlefile_file_003114.pdf [28 Aug 2014]

Ministry of Education, MOE (2014). Malaysia Education Blueprint annual report [Online], Available: http://www.padu.edu.my/files/AR/PADU_AR_2013_ENG.pdf [01 Sep 2014]

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI). (2017). Science and Technology Human Capital Roadmap: Towards 2020. Putrajaya: Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre, MOSTI

Mohandas, P., & Rajaratnam, P. OC. (2015). A policy analysis of the delivery of primary and secondary school Mathematics and Science in English. Education Research and Perspectives, 4(2015), 246-285

Morais, M. F., & Azevedo, I. (2010). What is a creative teacher and what is a creative pupil? Perceptions of teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 330-339.

Muhlisin, A. (2017). An Analysis of University Students' Conceptual Understanding and Retention on Science Basic Concepts. doi:10.31227/osf.io/yztdx

Nieswandt, M., & Horowitz, G. (2015). Undergraduate Students' Interest in Chemistry: The Roles of Task and Choice. Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning, 225-242. doi:10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4_13 ). Undergraduate Students' Interest in Chemistry: The Roles of Task and Choice. Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning, 225-242. doi:10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4_13

Niaz, M., & Luiggi, M. (2014). Facilitating Conceptual Change in Students' Understanding of the Periodic Table. SpringerBriefs in Education. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01086-1

Odell, M., & Kennedy, T. J. (2020). Inquiry-Based Pedagogy To Support Stem Learning And 21St Century Skills: Preparing New Teachers To Implement Project And Problem-Based Learning. INTED2020 Proceedings. doi:10.21125/inted.2020.1976

OECD. (2017), education at a Glanc 2017: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris .http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2017-enOsborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation

Otte, C. R., Bølling, M., Elsborg, P., Nielsen, G., & Bentsen, P. (2019). Teaching maths outside the classroom: Does it make a difference? Educational Research, 61(1), 38-52. doi:10.1080/00131881.2019.1567270

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and in the sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18: 948-952

Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design Thinking: Understand-Improve-Apply.Berlin: Springer-Verlag. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13757-0

Purdy, J. P. (2014). What can design thinking offer writing studies? College Composition and Communication, 65(4), 612–641.

Rahmawati, M. A., Agustin, A., Ridwan, E., Erdawati, D., Darwis, R., & Rafiuddin. (2019) The development of chemistry students' 21 century skills through a STEAM project on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1402, 055049.

Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design Thinking: An Educational Model towards Creative Confidence. In First International Conference on Design Creativity (pp.1–8). Kobe, Japan.

Regan, E., & DeWitt, J. (2015). Attitudes, interest and factors influencing STEM enrolment behaviour: An overview of relevant literature. In Understanding student participation and choice in science and technology education (pp. 63-88). Springer Netherlands.

Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century. Educational leadership, 67(1), 16-21.

Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N. ,and Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers' knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms, American Educational Research Journal, 50(5): 1020-1049

Regan, E., & Dewitt, J. (2014). Attitudes, Interest and Factors Influencing STEM Enrolment Behaviour: An Overview of Relevant Literature. Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education, 63-88. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7793-4_5

Russell, J. W., Kozma, R. B., Jones, T., Wykoff, J., Marx, N., & Davis, J. (1997). Use of simultaneous-synchronized macroscopic, microscopic, and symbolic representations to enhance the teaching and learning of chemical concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(3), 330. doi:10.1021/ed074p330

Sadler, M. (2013). 2020 Vision. Itnow, 55(1), 22-23. doi:10.1093/itnow/bws134

Silverman, M. P. (2015). Motivating Students to Learn Science: A Physicist's Perspective. Creative Education, 06(18), 1892-1992. doi:10.4236/ce.2015.618203

Scheer, A., & Plattner, H. (2011). Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8–19.

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4, 2-20.

Scoffham, Stephen and Barnes, Jonathan (2011). Happiness Matters: Towards a Pedagogy of Happiness and Well-being. The Curriculum Journal, 22(4), pp. 535-548

Skaggs, P., Fry, R., & Howell, B. (2009). Innovations Unlimited: Thinking About Design Thinking. In The NCIIA 13th Annual Meeting (p. 2009). Washington, D.C.

Starko, A. J. (2013). creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight. Routledge.

Starko, A. J. (2013). Creativity in the Classroom. doi:10.4324/9780203115176

Steele, D., & Whitaker, T. (2019). Good Lesson Plans Don't Redeem Poor Relationships. Get to Know Your Students … Then It Becomes Much Easier to Teach Them. Essential Truths for Teachers, 11-12. doi:10.4324/9780429022029-7

Starko, A. J., & Krynski, A. (2020). Classroom Environment Conducive to Creativity. Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation, 1-6. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4.

Sindia, S. (2015). Innovative practices session 2C: New technologies, new challenges - 2. 2015 IEEE 33rd VLSI Test Symposium (VTS). doi:10.1109/vts.2015.7116258

Touli, E., Talbi, M., & Radid, M. (2015, June 18). Teaching and Learning of Experimental Science: The Case of Chemistry in Secondary Qualifying Morocco.

Thomas, S., & Budnik, M. (2017). Can a First-year Professor be More Successful with a Flipped Classroom than with a Traditional Classroom? 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. doi:10.18260/1-2—28001

Treagust, D. F., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological, and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 297-328.

Watson, A. D. (2015). Design Thinking for Life. Art Education, 68(3), 12–18. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1060382&lang=de&site=edslive&authtype=ip,uid\nhttp://www.arteducators.org/research/art-education

Westwood, P. (2013). Inclusive and Adaptive Teaching: Meeting the challenge of diversity in the classroom (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203069806

World Economic Forum. (20160. The Global Competitiveness Report 2015–2016.Geneva: World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum. (2018). The Future of Jobs Report 2018, Geneva: World Economic Forum: ISBN 978-1-944835-18-7

Widodo, S. (2018). Implementation Of Tgt Learning Model To Improve Learning Activities And Study Results. JCER (Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 2(1), 37. doi:10.26740/jcer.v2n1.p37-44

Yaman, F., Ayas, A., & Çalik, M. (2019). Facilitating grade 11 students' conceptual understanding of fundamental acid-base models. Turkish Journal of Education, 16-32. doi:10.19128/turje.449100