UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :research_report
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Zuraidah Zainol
Additional Authors :Suzyanty Mohd Shokory
Rusliza Yahaya
Azita Yunos
Title :The impact of students- as- customer identity of academic performance and student-lecturer relationship
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
Year of Publication :2018
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Marketization has forced higher education institutions (HEIs) to pursue student-as-customer (SAC) orientation. Despite its advantages, it has been raised that SAC could create more harm that may affect the pursuit to produce quality and balanced graduates. Much research has addressed the issue, but there remain paucity of empirical research on the extent to which students have embraced the CI and the impact of CI among students. Hence, this study attempts to determine the level of CI among Malaysian undergraduate students and the impact of CI on academic performance and student-lecturer relationship. This study adopted the positivist, deductive and quantitative approach. A sample consisted of 300 students with at least in their second years of study. The sample was selected using a cluster sampling method. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire and analysed using descriptive statistics and structural equation modelling (SEM). The findings reveal that only a small number of students at Malaysia HEIs embrace the CI. The effect of CI is only significant on academic performance, not a student-lecturer relationship. CI negatively affect academic performance, indicating the higher the CI, the lower the student academic performance. The findings enrich the understanding of the roles of CI among HEIs students and serve as a reference point that could stimulate and guide future research on the CI, particularly in Malaysia educational context.

References

Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, And Practices (2nd

edition ed.). Zurich, Switzerland: Creative Commons Attribution.

 

Bunce, L., Baird, A., & Jones, S. E. (2017). The student-as-consumer approach in higher

education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11),

1958-1978.

 

Darusalam, G., & Hussin, S. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:

Universiti Malaya.

 

Gokcen, N., Hefferon, K., & Attree, E. (2012). University students' constructions

of'flourishing'in British higher education: An inductive content analysis. International

Journal of Wellbeing, 2(1).

 

Guilbault, M. (2016). Students as customers in higher education: reframing the debate. Journal

of Marketing for Higher Education, 26(2), 132-142.

 

Guilbault, M. (2018). Students as customers in higher education: The (controversial) debate

needs to end. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 295-298.

 

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A

global perspective (7th edition ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education

Inc.

 

Herrmann, K. J., Bager-Elsborg, A., & McCune, V. (2017). Investigating the relationships

between approaches to learning, learner identities and academic achievement in higher

education. Higher Education, 74(3), 385-400.

 

Koris, R., Örtenblad, A., Kerem, K., & Ojala, T. (2015). Student-customer orientation at a higher

education institution: the perspective of undergraduate business students. Journal of

Marketing for Higher Education, 25(1), 29-44. doi: 10.1080/08841241.2014.972486

 

Lesnik-Oberstein, K. (2015). Let UK universities do what they do best–teaching and research.

The Guardian, Letters.

 

Malhotra, N. K. (2009). Basic Marketing Research: A decision making approach (3rd edition

ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

 

Mark, E. (2013). Student satisfaction and the customer focus in higher education. Journal of

Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 2-10.

 

Ministry of Higher Education. (2016). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015 2025 (Higher

Education). Retrieved from https://www.mohe.gov.my/muatturun/

awam/penerbitan/pppm-2015-2025-pt/5-malaysia-education-blueprint-2015-2025-

higher-education

 

Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: the

marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer.

Teaching in higher Education, 14(3), 277-287. doi: 10.1080/13562510902898841

 

Pathan, S. K., Mahesar, H. A., & Shah, S. (2017). The Impact Of Student Consumerism

Metaphor On Higher Education Students: A Critical Review Of Literature. Grassroots,

50(3).

 

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th

edition ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

 

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2009). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach

(5th edition ed.). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

 

Shukla, P. (2008). Essentials of Marketing Research Retrieved from www.bookboon.com

 

Sornsri, S., & Bing, Z. (2017). Determinants of Student-Lecturer Relationship and its Outcomes:

Assumption University of Thailand.

 

Tomlinson, M. (2017). Student perceptions of themselves as ‘consumers’ of higher education.

British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(4), 450-467.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.