UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :GV Recreation Leisure
Main Author :Faizal Hakimi Samsudin
Title :Pembinaan dan kebolehgunaan instrumen pentaksiran murid berkeperluan khas berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam pendidikan jasmani tingkatan dua
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan
Year of Publication :2021
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membina Instrumen Pentaksiran Murid Berkeperluan Khas (IPMBK) berdasarkan permainan kategori serangan dalam Pendidikan Jasmani Tingkatan Dua. Asas pembinaan IP-MBK berdasarkan model Kitaran PDCA iaitu plan, do, check dan act. Reka bentuk kajian kes sekali dijalankan di 11 buah sekolah menengah yang menawarkan Program Pendidikan Khas Integrasi di daerah Kinta Utara, Perak. Sampel kajian seramai 17 orang guru Pendidikan Jasmani dan 65 orang murid berkeperluan khas dipilih melalui persampelan rawak bertujuan. Nilai kesahan panel pakar, kebolehpercayaan instrumen, objektiviti antara penguji serta kebolehpercayaan item soal selidik adalah pada tahap tinggi dan amat baik. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif menggunakan min, sisihan piawai dan peratusan. Analisis menggunakan Ujian-t menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan terhadap pencapaian tahap penguasaan murid mengikut kategori sekolah dan jantina. Keputusan ANOVA sehala menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan pencapaian tahap penguasaan murid bagi permainan bola baling dan ragbi sentuh mengikut jenis kurang upaya. Berdasarkan ANOVA dua hala, tiada kesan utama dan kesan interaksi terhadap jenis kurang upaya dan jantina bagi permainan bola baling dan ragbi sentuh. Analisis korelasi menggunakan kaedah Pearson Product Moment pula menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang sangat kuat dan signifikan antara pencapaian tahap penguasaan murid dalam permainan kategori serangan dan jenis kurang upaya (autisme, kurang upaya intelektual, lembam dan disleksia). Instrumen Pentaksiran Murid Berkeperluan Khas sesuai digunakan untuk mentaksir pencapaian tahap penguasaan murid bagi permainan kategori serangan. Penggunaan IP-MBK sebagai instrumen pentaksiran alternatif dapat melahirkan murid yang cergas, sihat, berkemahiran dan berpengetahuan, mampu bersosialisasi serta mengamalkan gaya hidup sihat.

References

Ab Rahman, Z., Kamal, A. A., Mohd Nor, M. A., & Ab Latif, R. (2020). The effectiveness

of teaching games for understanding to promote enjoyment in teaching games of

physical education lesson. Jurnal Sains Sukan & Pendidikan Jasmani, 9(1), 23-32.

https://doi. org/10.37134/jsspj.vol9.1.4.2020.

 

Abdul Razak Noruzzaman. (2017). Profil penaakulan pelajar berdasarkan permainan

kategori jaring dan dinding dalam pendidikan jasmani [Tesis Doktor Falsafah].

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Abdullah, M., Q. (2018). Gender difference in learning disabled children

neuropsychological review. research and reviews on healthcare: Open access

journal, 1(3), 44-48. https://doi.org/ 10.32474/RRHOAJ.2018.01.000111.

 

Abilla, P. (2014). PDCA cycle or PDSA cycle – Which is right? https://www. shmula.

com/pdca-cycle-or-pdsa-cycle-which-is-right/13653/.

 

Abu Bakar Nordin & Bhasah Abu Bakar. (2008). Penaksiran dalam pendidikan & sains

sosial. Tanjung Malim, Perak. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Jounal of the

medical library association, 103(3), 152-153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-

5050.103.3.010

 

Ahmad Hashim. (2014). Panduan analisis data secara efisien. Selangor. Dubook Press

Sdn. Bhd.

 

Algahtani, F. (2017) Teaching students with intellectual disabillities: Contructivism or

behaviorism? Educational research and reviews, 12(21), 1031-1035.

 

American Society & Quality. (2018, Ogos 6). Learn about quality. http://asq. org/learnabout-

quality/project-planning-tools/overview/pdca-cycle.html.

 

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and

assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy Of educational objectives. New York.

Longman.

 

Ariel, T. W., Wachen, J., Cannata, M. & Lora, C. V. (2017). Continuous improvement in

the public school context: Understanding how educators respond to plan–do–

study–act cycles. Journal of educational change, 18, 465-494. https://doi.org/

10.1007/s10833-017-9301-4.

 

Arsaythamby, V., Hariharan, N. K. & Ruzlan Md Ali. (2015). Teachers’ knowledge and

readiness towards implementation of school based assessment in secondary

schools. International education studies, 8(11), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.

5539/ies.v8n11p193.

 

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. & Sorensen, C. (2010). Inroduction to research in education. 8thed.

California. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

 

Atieno, L. (2017, October 18). Why schools should involve students in decision making.

The New Times. https://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/read/221965.

 

Ayu Rahayu. (2018). The analysis of students’ cognitive ability based on assesments of the

revised bloom’s taxonomy on statistic materials. European Journal of

Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(2), 80-85.

 

Baglama, B. & Demirok, M. (2018). The role of physical education for children with

special needs: A review study. Near East University Online Journal of Education,

1(1), 34-41, https://doi.org/10.32955/neuje.v1i1.54.

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2015). Kurikulum standard sekolah menengah

pendidikan khas. pendidikan jasmani dan pendidikan kesihatan. Dokumen

standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran tingkatan 1. Putrajaya. Kementerian

Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016). Kurikulum standard sekolah menengah

pendidikan khas. pendidikan jasmani dan pendidikan kesihatan. Dokumen

standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran tingkatan 2. Putrajaya. Kementerian

Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2017). Kurikulum standard sekolah menengah

pendidikan khas. pendidikan jasmani dan pendidikan kesihatan. Dokumen

standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran tingkatan 3. Putrajaya. Kementerian

Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2018). Panduan pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik

darjah. Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2019). Panduan pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik

darjah. Ed. ke-2. Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Pendidikan Khas. (2015). Buku panduan pengoperasian program pendidikan

khas integrasi. Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Bahagian Pendidikan Khas. (2018). Garis panduan program pendidikan inklusif murid

berkeperluan khas. Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Baker, J.N., Rivera, C.J., Morgan, J.J. & Reese, N. (2015). Teaching algebraic equations

to middle school students with intellectual disabilities. Academy of Special

Education Professionals, 29-43.

 

Barba-Martín, R. A., Bores-García, D., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D. & González-Calvo, G.

(2020). The application of the teaching games for understanding in physical

education. Systematic review of the last six years. International Journal of

Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 1-16.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093330.

 

Barton, E. (2016). Critical issues and promising practices for teaching play to young

children with disabilities. Handbook of early childhood special education. Basel.

Springer.

 

Bertills, K., Granlund, M. & Augustine, L. (2019). Inclusive teaching skills and student

engagement in physical education. Frontiers in Education, 4(74), 1-13.

https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00074.

 

Bertills, K., Granlund, M., Dahlstrom, O. & Augustine, L. (2018). Relationships between

physical education (PE) teaching and student self-efficacy, aptitude to participate

in PE and functional skills: With a special focus on students with disabilities.

Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy Journal, 23(4), 387-401.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1441394.

 

Bhagyalakshmi, H. R. & Seshachalam, D. (2015). Student performance using blooms

cognition levels: A case study. Journals of Engineering Education Transformation,

Special Issue 2015, 122-125.

 

Bhasah Abu Bakar. (2007). Kaedah analisis data penyelidikan ilmiah. Kuala Lumpur.

Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.

 

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Book 1 cognitive domain. New

York. Longman.

 

Bunker, D. & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in the secondary

school. Bulletin of Physical Education, 10, 9-16.

 

Butler, J. & Ovens, A. (2015). TGfU and its governance. ButlerAgora for PE and Sport,

17(1), 77-92.

 

Bykov, V. Y. & Leshchenko, M. P. (2016). Digital humanistic pedagogy: Relevent

problems of scientific research in the field of using ICT in education. Information

Technologies and Learning Tools, 53(3), 1-17.

 

Cetin, E. & Ozdemir, S. (2013). A study on an educational website’s usability. Procedia –

Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 683-688.

 

Chiarini, A. (2015, September 1). Effects of ISO 9001 certification on academic processes.

A first exploratory research from Italy. [Conference presentation abstract]. 18th

Toulon-Verona (ICQSS) Conference "Excellence in Services", Palermo, Italy.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur. McGraw-Hill (Malaysia).

 

Chua, Y. P. (2012). Mastering research methods. Shah Alam, Selangor. McGraw-Hill

(Malaysia).

 

Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decisionmaking

tasks in education, Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373-386.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401.

 

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2001). Research methods in education. 5th ed.

Oxford. Routledge Falmer Publisher.

 

Collins, R. (2013). Authentic assessment: Assessment for learning. Curriculum &

Leadership Journal, 11(7), 33-37.

 

Cousin, G. (2009). Researching learning in higher education. London. Routledge

 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research. planning, conducting and evaluating

quantitative and qualitative research. 4th ed. New Jersey. Pearson Education Ltd.

 

Dawson C. 2002. Practical Research Methods: A User-Friendly Guide to Mastering

Research. United Kingdom. How To Books.

 

Dicken, K. & Tajul, A., M. (2017). Cabaran pengajaran subjek pendidikan jasmani di

sekolah menengah di malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies 2017, 2(2), 53-65.

 

Division of Population Health. (2020). Inclusion in school physical education and physical

activity. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion of

USA.

 

Doozan, A., & Bae, M. (2016). Teaching physical literacy to promote healthy lives: TGfU

and related approaches. The Physical Educator, 73(3).

https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2016-V73-I3-6364.

 

Enero, U. J. & Akangbe, J. M. (2015). Classification of end of chapter questions in senior

school chemistry textbooks used in Nigeria. Electronic Journal of Science

Education, 19(7), 1-16.

 

Fakhri Abdul Khalil & Mohd Isha Awang. (2016). Isu kesediaan guru dalam amalan

melaksanakan pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah. EDUCATUM-Journal of Social

Science, 2(2016), 1-7.

 

Frost, J. (2020, October 4). Benefits of Welch’s ANOVA compared to the classic One-

Way ANOVA. Today. https://statisticsbyjim.com/anova/welchs-anova-comparedto-

classic -one-way-anova/.

 

Gardner, J., Harlen, W., Hayward, L. & Stobart, G. (2008). Changing assessment practice:

Process, principles and standards. London. Assessment Reform Group.

 

Glen, S. (2019, November 20). Research Variable / Study Variable. Today. https://

www.statisticshowto.com/research-variable-study/.

 

Grande, T. (2016, April 1). ANOVA with Welch Test in SPSS for unequal sample sizes &

significant Levene's Test [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=

o2K4Qa1za0o.

 

Grant, C. & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical

Framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for ‘house’.

Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice and Research, 12-

22. https://doi.org/10.5929/2014.4.2.9

 

Greguol, M., Malagodi, B. M. & Carraro, A. (2018). Inclusion of students with disabilities

in physical education classes: Teachers' attitudes in regular schools. Revista

Brasileira de Educação Especial, 24(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-

65382418000100004.

 

Griffin, L. L. & Butler, J. I. (2005). Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research

and practice. Champaign. Human Kinetics.

 

Gunduz, N. & Hursena, C. (2015). Constructivism in teaching and learning: Content

analysis evaluation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(2015), 526–

533.

 

Guskey, T. R. & McTighe, J. (2016). Pre-assessment: Promises and cautions. Educational,

School and Counseling Psychology Faculty Publications, 73(7), 38-43.

 

Haegele, J.A. & Park, S.Y. (2016). Utilizing generalization tactics to promote leisure-time

physical activity for students with intellectual disabilities. Sport Educators, 29(4),

19-23.

 

Hasan Md. Zahid & Hossain Md. Sanowar. (2018). Improvement of effectiveness by

applying PDCA cycle or kaizen: An experimental study on engineering students.

Journal of Scientific Research, 10(2), 159-173. https://doi.org/10.

3329/jsr.v10i2.35638.

 

Hattie, J. (2015). We aren't using assessments correctly: There’s a distinction between

formative and summative assessments. Education Week Journal, 35(10), 23-28.

 

Hortiguela, D. & Hernando, A. (2017). Teaching games for understanding: A

comprehensive approach to promote student's motivation in physical

education. Journal of Human Kinetics, 59, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/ hukin-

2017-0144.

 

Hortiguela, D., Perez-Pueyo, A. & Calderon A. (2016). Effect of the model of teaching on

physical self-concept of students in physical education. Retos, 2016(30), 76 81.

 

Imms, C., Granlund, M., Wilson, P. H., Steenbergen, B., Rosenbaum, P. L., and Gordon,

A. M. (2017). Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of

processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 59, 16–

25. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/dmcn.13237.

 

Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia. (2019). Buku panduan pentaksiran edisi 2019.

Cyberjaya. Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia.

 

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). International standard ISO 21001.

1st ed. ISO 21001:2018(E).

 

International Organization for Standardization. (2021, February 27). ISO today. Today.

https://www.iso.org/about-us.html.

 

Jabatan Standard Malaysia. (2017). Malaysian standard MS ISO 9001:2015. Sistem

pengurusan kualiti – Keperluan (semakan kedua). Cyberjaya. Kementerian Sains,

Teknologi dan Inovasi.

 

Julismah Jani & Syed Kamaruzaman Syed Ali. (2012). Ilmu konten pedagogi dengan

pelaksanaan pengajaran guru dalam pendidikan jasmani di sekolah menengah

Malaysia-Indonesia. Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani, Mei 2012, 1-13.

 

Kamarul Azmi Jasmi. (2012). Analisis data dalam penyelidikan kualitatif. Kursus

Penyelidikan. Kualitatif Siri 3. 22-23 Mei. Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus

Temenggong Ibrahim. 1-11.

 

Kamlasi, I. (2018). Descriptive analyses on english test items based on the application of

revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature,

and Teaching, 2(2), 203 - 210. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v2i2.847.

 

Kamus Dewan Edisi Keempat. (2010). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Kartikowati, R. S. (2013). The technique of “plan do check and act” to improve trainee

teachers’ skills. Canadian Center of Science and Education. 9(12), 268-275.

https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n12p268.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2004). Surat pekeliling ikhtisas bil. 7/2004:

Pelaksanaan kurikulum pendidikan khas bermasalah pembelajaran sekolah rendah

dan sekolah menengah. Kuala Lumpur. Bahagian Sekolah.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012a). Dasar pendidikan kebangsaan. Ed. ke-3. Shah

Alam. Giga Wise Network Sdn. Bhd.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012b). Laporan awal pelan pembangunan

pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia

2013-2025: Pendidikan prasekolah hingga lepas menengah. Putrajaya.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Surat pekeliling ikhtisas bil. 9/2016:

Pelaksanaan kurikulum standard sekolah menengah secara berperingkatperingkat

mulai tahun 2017. Putrajaya. Bahagian Sekolah.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018a). Data pendidikan khas tahun 2018.

https://www.moe.gov.my/en/muat-turun/pendidikankhas/buku-data pendidikan -

khas/1681-buku-data-pendidikan-khas-tahun-2018/file.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018b, 5 Mei). Sejarah program. Today.

https://www.moe.gov.my/pendidikan/khas/program-pendidikan-khas-integrasi

/sejarah.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018c, 5 Mei). Tujuan program. Today. https://

www.moe.gov.my/pendidikan/khas/program-pendidikan-khas-integrasi/ tujuan -

program.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020a). Data pendidikan khas tahun 2020.

https://www.moe.gov.my/en/muat-turun/pendidikankhas/buku-data pendidikan -

khas/3993-buku-data-pendidikan-khas-tahun-2020/file.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020b, Disember 18). Pengenalan. https://www.

moe.gov.my/ en/special-education/rancangan-pendidikan-individu/pengenalan.

 

Kincal, R. Y., Yazgan, A. D. & Kartal, O. Y. (2016). The effect of lesson study approach

upon critical thinking skills development: An investigation into arabic language

pre-service teachers. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning

in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 2016, 406-414.

 

Lau, X.,C., Wong, Y. L., Wong, J. E., Koh, D., Sedek, R., Jamil, A. T., Ng, A.,L. O.,

Hazizi, A. S., Ruzita, A. T. & Poh, B. K. (2019). Development and validation of a

physical activity educational module for overweight and obese adolescents:

CERGAS programme. International Journal of Environmental Research and

Public Health, 16(1506), 1-16.

 

Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2012). Panduan pengurusan pentaksiran berasaskan

sekolah (PBS). Kuala Lumpur. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.

 

Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2013). Kajian PBS: Kefahaman dan amalan guru. Kuala

Lumpur. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.

 

Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2014). Kajian pelaksanaan PBS: Dokumen standard

prestasi. Kuala Lumpur. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia.

 

Lenjani, I. (2015). Contructivism and behaviorism methodologies on special needs

education. European Journal of Special Education Research, 1(1), 17-24.

 

Lidor, R. & Hutzler, Y. (2019). Including students with disabilities in a physical education

teacher preparation program: An institutional perspective. Intech Open, Advance

online publication. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85268.

 

Lim, C. H. (2007). Penyelidikan pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantiatif dan kualitatif.

Selangor. McGraw- Hill (Malaysia).

 

Liza Saad. (2017). Pentaksiran pembelajaran kemahiran asas bagi permainan kategori

serangan dalam pendidikan jasmani tahun 4 [Tesis Doktor Falsafah]. Universiti

Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Mclaren, H. (2010). Physical education and physical activity : Opportunities for students

with a disability. South Australia. Ministerial Advisory Committee.

 

Memmert, D., Almond, L., Bunker, D., Butler, J., Fasold, F., Griffin, L., Hillmann, W.,

Hüttermann, S., Klein-Soetebier, T., König, S., Nopp, S., Rathschlag, M., Schul,

K., Schwab, S., Thorpe, R., & Furley, P. (2015). Top 10 research questions related

to teaching games for understanding. Research quarterly for exercise and sport,

86(4), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2015.1087294.

 

Miller, D. K. (2006). Measurement by the physical educator. Why and how. 5th ed.

Dubuque, Iowa. Wm. C. Brown.

 

Mitchell, S., Oslin, J. & Griffin, L. L. (2013). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical

games approach. 3rd ed. Champaign. Human Kinetics.

 

Moen, R. & Norman, C. (2009). Evolution of the PDCA cycle. https://www.

researchgate.net/publication/228475044_Evolution_of_the_PDCA_cycle.

 

Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar. (1999). Reka bentuk tinjauan soal selidik pendidikan.

Skudai. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Mohammad Khatib. (2013). Humanistic education: Concerns, implications and

applications. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(1), 45-51. https://

doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.1.45-51.

 

Mohd Izwan Shahril, Norkhalid Salimin & Gunathevan Elumalai. (2015). The validity and

reliability of ISO test towards the performance assessment of future physical

education teachers in teaching and learning process. Procedia – Social and

Behavioral Sciences, 195, 814–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro. 2015.06.184.

 

Mohd Izwan Shahril, Norkhalid Salimin & Julismah Jani. (2017). Taakulan melalui

modifikasi permainan. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Mohd Izwan Shahril. (2017). Keberkesanan instrumen pentaksiran pembelajaran (IPP)

berasaskan teaching games for understanding (TGfU) bagi permainan badminton

[Tesis Doktor Falsafah]. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Mohd Majid Konting. (2000). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan

Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Mohd Sahandri Gani Hamzah, Laily Paim, Sharifah Azizah Haron, Mohd Faizal Nizam

& Lee Abdullah. (2013). Buku panduan pembinaan instrumen. Anda dan

kepenggunaan. Tanjung Malim, Perak. Emeritus Publications.

 

Movahedazarhouligh & Sara. (2018). Teaching play skills to children with disabilities:

Research-based interventions and practices. Early Childhood Education Journal.

https://doi.org/46. 10.1007/s10643-018-0917-7.

 

Muehleck, J. K., Smith, C. L. & Allen, J. M. (2014). Understanding the advising learning

process using learning taxonomies. NACADA Journal, 34(2), 63-74.

https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-13-013.

 

Munafo, C. (2016). The role of the social constructivism in physical education.

International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 4(4), 489-497.

 

Nabiullina, R. K. (2015). The principle of humanism - The fundamental principle of

inclusive education. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 7(4), 73-76.

https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v7n4p73.

 

Neilson J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. https://www.nngroup.com

/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/

 

Niekerk, J. & Solms, R. (2017). Using Bloom’s taxonomy for information security

education. Information assurance and security education and training, 4(2), 280-

287.

 

Norazilawati Abdullah, Nik Azmah Nik Yusof & Rosnidar Mansor. (2012). pelaksanaan

pendekatan konstruktivisme dalam mata pelajaran sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains

dan Matematik Malaysia, 2(1), 78-92.

 

Noriati A. Rashid, Boon, P. Y. & Sharifah Fakhriah Syed Ahmad. (2012). Murid dan alam

belajar: Edisi kemas kini. Shah Alam. Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd.

 

Norkhalid Salimin. (2012). Pentaksiran komprehensif dalam mata pelajaran jasmani

berdasarkan model K [Tesis Doktor Falsafah]. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Norman, C. L. (2016, February 10). Evolution Of PDSA and the difference between PDSA

and PDCA. https://asqaustin.org/wp content/uploads/2015/12/History_

of_the_PDSA_Cycle_CN_ASQ_Talk_2_10_2016_Handout.pdf.

 

O'Leary, N. (2014). Learning informally to use teaching games for understanding: The

experiences of a recently qualified teacher. European Physical Education

Review,20, 367–384.

 

Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York. Grossman

Publishers.

 

Radmehr, F. & Drake, M. (2019). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy and major theories and

frameworks that influence the teaching, learning, and assessment of mathematics:

a comparison. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and

Technology, 50(6), 895-920, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 0020739X.2018.1549336.

 

Rahayu Yuni, Yuliani & Wijaya Bagus. (2018). Implementation of science process skills

using ICT-based approach to facilitate student life skills. IOP Conference Series:

Materials Science and Engineering, 296(2018), 1-9. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1757-

899X/296/1/012035.

 

Rahman, Saemah, Marzuki & Maziah Ahmad. (2017). Applying the humanistic learning

theory: Effects on the experience and learning pattern related to the prevention of

child obesity. American Scientific Publishers. 23(2), 1000-1004.

https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7472.

 

Ravitch, S. M. & Carl, N. M. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual,

theoretical and methodological. Los Angeles, U.S.A. SAGE Publications, Inc.

 

Rink, J. E. (2002). Teaching physical education for learning. 4th ed. New York. McGraw

Hill.

 

Rosida. (2013, Ogos 20). Isu-isu pendidikan khas. [Web log post]. https://www.

slideshare.net/rosidaida9/isu-isu-pendidikan-khas.

 

Ross, P. T & Zaidi, N. L. B. (2019) Limited by our limitations. Perspect Med Educ., 8(4),

261-264. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s40037-019-00530-x

 

Rossett, A. (1987). Techniques in training and performance development series: Training

needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Educational Technology Publications.

 

Schaeffer, K. (2020). As schools shift to online learning amid pandemic, here’s what we

know about disabled students in the U.S. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact

tank/2020/04/23/as-schools-shift-to-online-learning-amid-pandemic-hereswhat -

we-know-about-disabled-students-in-the-u-s/.

 

Sharma, R. M. & Sharma, A. (2016). What students say about homework – Views from a

secondary school science classroom in Trinidad and Tobago. Australian Journal of

Teacher Education, 41(7), 146-157.

 

Sidek Mohd Noah & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2008). Pembinaan modul. Bagaimana membina

modul latihan dan modul akademik. Selangor. Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Sidek Mohd Noah. (2018). Reka bentuk penyelidikan: Falsafah, teori dan praktis.

Selangor. Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Slingerland, M., Haerens, L., Cardon, G. & Borghouts, L. (2014). Differences in perceived

competence and physical activity levels during single-gender modified basketball

game play in middle school physical education. European Physical Education

Review. 20(1), 20–35,

 

Smith, L. D. (2015). Male gender disparity gap: Does gender impact education [Tesis

Kajian Lanjutan Yang Tidak Diterbitkan]. Sacred Heart University.

 

Smith, T. E. C., Polloway, E., Patton, J. R. & Dowdy, C. A. (2004). Teaching students with

special needs in inclusive settings. 4th ed.. Boston. Pearson Educational Inc.

 

Sonmez, I. (2017). Association of cognitive, affective, psychomotor and intuitive domains

in education, Sonmez model. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3),

347-356. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050307.

 

Suhono, K. A. S. (2014). Game for children with special needs. Journal of Information

Systems, 1(2), 18-20. https://doi.org/ 10.24167/sisforma.v1i2.400

 

Syahida Nadia Zakaria. (2015). Kesan pendekatan konstruktivisme dan pendekatan

tradisional dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran komponen sastera bahasa melayu.

Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 5(2), 12-21.

 

Tabrizi, S. & Rideout, G. (2017). Active learning: Using Bloom's taxonomy to support

critical pedagogy. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in

Education, 8(3), 3202-3209.

 

Tant, M. & Watelain, E. (2016). Forty years later, a systematic literature review on

inclusion in physical education (1975-2015): a teacher perspective. Educ. Res.

Rev. 19, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.04.002.

 

Thomas, J. R. & Nelson, J. K. (2001). Research methods in physical activity. 4th ed.

Champaign, IL. Human Kinetics.

 

Topolovcan, T. (2016). Art-based research of constructivist teaching. Croatian Journal of

Education, 28(4), 1141-1172. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v18i4.2074.

 

UKEssays. (2018, November 22). Strengths and weaknesses of the teaching games for

understanding model.https://www.ukessays.com/essays /teaching /strengths-andweak

nesses-of-the-teaching-games-for-understanding-model.php ?vref=1.

 

Unit Pendidikan Khas. (2018). Senarai maklumat sekolah. Ipoh, Perak. Jabatan Pendidikan

Negeri.

 

Usher, W., Edwards, A. & Meyrick, B. (2015). Utilizing educational theoretical Models to

support effective physical education pedagogy. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1-10.

https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1094847.

 

Vinz, S. (2020, October 22). Developing your theoretical framework. [Web log post].

https:// www.scribbr.com/dissertation/theoretical-framework/.

 

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.

 

Wang, L., Wang, M. & Wen, H. (2015). Teaching practice of physical education teachers

for students with special needs: An application of the theory of planned behaviour.

International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 62, 590-607.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2015.1077931.

 

Wang, M. & Wang, L. (2018). Teaching games for understanding intervention to promote

physical activity among secondary school students. BioMed Research

International, 2018, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3737595.

 

Warta Kerajaan Persekutuan. (2013). Peraturan-peraturan pendidikan (pendidikan khas)

2013. Kuala Lumpur. Jabatan Peguam Negara.

 

Way, T. K. (2017). Using teaching cases for achieving Bloom ’s highorder cognitive levels:

An application in technically oriented information systems course. Presented

SIGED International Conference on Information Systems Education and Research.

10 Disember. Singapore.

 

Willis, I. & Prescott, D. (November, 2015). Semi-structured interviews for educational

research. https://www.slideshare.net/tundeva/semistructured-interviews-foreducational-

research.

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)