Cognitive poetic structure in Thirukkural

Selvajothi Ramalingam

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	P Language and Literature
Main Author :	Selvajothi Ramalingam
Title :	Cognitive poetic structure in Thirukkural

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
Year of Publication :	2020
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Language is not only a communication tool for humans, but it also plays an important role to improve humans’ thinking skills. Literature components in languages help humans to cultivate emotional and intellectual intelligence. Most readers are inclined towards emotional intelligence (aesthetic values) rather than the intellectualvelements exposed in the literature. Thus, this study presents the intellectual poetic structure in Thirukkural. The data were analyzed qualitatively based on document analysis. The analysis was carried out based on the poetic cognitive theory which was proposed by Tsur Rven (2002). First, the researcher has identified the elements of poetic cognitive in Thirukkural then those elements were analysed. Findings show that Thirukkural is one of the Tamil literature which stimulates thinking skills namely creative and critical thinking skills. These thinking skills were revealed by the figurative language used in the Thirukkural.

References

Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1984). Taxonomy of educational objectives book 1: Cognitive domain. Boston: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.

Brandt, L., & Brandt, P. A. (2005). Cognitive poetics and imagery. European Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 117-130.

Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Cuthbert, A. S. (2019). Literature as aesthetic knowledge: implications for curriculum and education. The Curriculum Journal, 30(2), 181-195.

Fahruroji, F. (2019). Relationship Between Language and Thinking Activities as Well As Relationship Between Language and Culture. Prosiding Pertemuan Ilmiah Internasional Bahasa Arab, 1401-1416.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Kao, C. Y. (2020). How Figurativity of Analogy Affects Creativity: The Application of Four-Term Analogies to Teaching for Creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity. Retreived from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100653

Brandt, L., & Brandt, P. A. (2005). Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 216-249.

Montag-Smit, T., & Maertz Jr, C. P. (2017). Searching outside the box in creative problem solving: The role of creative thinking skills and domain knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 81, 1-10.

Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. 3, 1633 - 1636.

Safei, M., & Hassan, T. R. R. (2020). Daun sebagai Wahana Komunikasi dalam Kesusasteraan Melayu. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36 (3), 157-175.

Salleh, H. (2005). Puisi Siti Hawa Haji Salleh: Lintasan Tragis yang Menghibakan Arbak Othman. Dewan sastera, 35(7-12).

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page