Ankle range of motion and dynamic balance in recreational Sepak Takraw players with and without ankle injury-A comparative study

Ali Md Nadzalan

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	RC1200 Sports Medicine
ISSN :	2664-9837
Main Author :	Ali Md Nadzalan
Title :	Ankle range of motion and dynamic balance in recreational Sepak Takraw players with and without ankle injury-A comparative study

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan
Year of Publication :	2021
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :	Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Sepak Takraw (ST) is considered Malaysia’s national sport, and the nature of this sport requires players to be sufficiently acrobatic. Therefore, players were expected to jump and regain their balance, challenging their dynamic balance (DB). Nonetheless, range of motion (ROM) is closely related to balance. Hence, this study aimed to compare recreational ST players’ ankle ROM and DB differences with and without ankle injuries.

References

1. Adam NM. Experimental analysis of mechanical properties of selected takraw balls in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Movement, Health & Exercise, 2014;3. https://doi.org/10.15282/mohe.v3i0.18

2. Rezaei M, Mimar R, Azad A. Comparison of Static and Dynamic Balance in Sepak takraw Male Elite Players. International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 2013;2(3):359–62.

3. Jawis M, Singh R, Singh H, Yassin M. Anthropometric and physiological profiles of sepak takraw players. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005;39(11):825–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2004.016915

4. Kubo Y, Nakazato K, Koyama K, Tahara Y, Funaki A, Hiranuma K. The relation between hamstring strain injury and physical characteristics of Japanese collegiate Sepak Takraw Players. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 2016;37(12):986–91. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-114700

5. Gribble PA, Hertel J, Plisky P. Using the Star Excursion Balance Test to assess dynamic postural-control deficits and outcomes in lower extremity injury: a literature and systematic review. Journal of Athletic Training, 2012;47(3):339–57. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-47.3.08

6. Al-Mohrej OA, Al-Kenani NS. Chronic ankle instability: Current perspectives. Avicenna Journal of Medicine, 2016;6(4):103. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0770.191446

7. Basnett CR, Hanish MJ, Wheeler TJ, Miriovsky DJ, Danielson EL, Barr J, et al. Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion influences dynamic balance in individuals with chronic ankle instability. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 2013;8(2):121.

8. Jain H, Rathod SA. Correlation between balance and ankle range of motion in community dwelling women having fear of fall aged 60 to 80 years. Journal of Exercise Science and Physiotherapy, 2015;11(1):22–8. https://doi.org/10.18376//2015/v11i1/67092

9. Kosik KB, Johnson NF, Terada M, Thomas AC, Mattacola CG, Gribble PA. Decreased dynamic balance and dorsiflexion range of motion in young and middleaged adults with chronic ankle instability. Journal of Science and Medicine in Spor,. 2019;22(9):976–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.05.005

10. Baumbach SF, Brumann M, Binder J, Mutschler W, Regauer M, Polzer H. The influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion-a biometric study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2014;15(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-246

11. Tavares P, Landsman V, Wiltshire L. Intra-examiner reliability of measurements of ankle range of motion using a modified inclinometer: a pilot study. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 2017;61(2):121.

12. Menadue C, Raymond J, Kilbreath SL, Refshauge KM, Adams R. Reliability of two goniometric methods of measuring active inversion and eversion range of motion at the ankle. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2006;7(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-60

13. Beazell JR, Grindstaff TL, Sauer LD, Magrum EM, Ingersoll CD, Hertel J. Effects of a proximal or distal tibiofibular joint manipulation on ankle range of motion and functional outcomes in individuals with chronic ankle instability. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 2012;42(2):125–34. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3729

14. Hoch MC, Staton GS, McKeon JMM, Mattacola CG, McKeon PO. Dorsiflexion and dynamic postural control deficits are present in those with chronic ankle instability. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2012;15(6):574–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2012.02.009

15. Plante JE, Wikstrom EA. Differences in clinician-oriented outcomes among controls, copers, and chronic ankle instability groups. Physical Therapy in Sport, 2013;14(4):221–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.09.005

16. Cordova ML, Sefton JM, Hubbard TJ. Mechanical joint laxity associated with chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. Sports Health, 2010;2(6):452–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738110382392

17. Roach KE, Foreman KB, Barg A, Saltzman CL, Anderson AE. Application of high-speed dual fluoroscopy to study in vivo tibiotalar and subtalar kinematics in patients with chronic ankle instability and asymptomatic control subjects during dynamic activities. Foot & Ankle International, 2017;38(11):1236–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717723128

18. Moisan G, Descarreaux M, Cantin V. Effects of chronic ankle instability on kinetics, kinematics and muscle activity during walking and running: a systematic review. Gait & Posture, 2017;52:381–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.11.037

19. Monaghan K, Delahunt E, Caulfield B. Ankle function during gait in patients with chronic ankle instability compared to controls. Clinical Biomechanics, 2006;21(2):168–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.09.004

20. Hertel J, Corbett RO. An updated model of chronic ankle instability. Journal of Athletic Training, 2019;54(6):572–88. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-344-18

21. Simpson JD, Rendos NK, Stewart EM, Turner AJ, Wilson SJ, Macias DM, et al. Bilateral spatiotemporal postural control impairments are present in participants with chronic ankle instability. Physical Therapy in Sport, 2019;39:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.06.002

22. Vomacka MM, Calhoun MR, Lininger MR, Ko J. Dorsiflexion range of motion in copers and those with chronic ankle instability. International Journal of Exercise Science, 2019;12(1):614.

23. Terada M, Harkey MS, Wells AM, Pietrosimone BG, Gribble PA. The influence of ankle dorsiflexion and self-reported patient outcomes on dynamic postural control in participants with chronic ankle instability. Gait & Posture, 2014;40(1):193–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.186

24. Olmsted LC, Carcia CR, Hertel J, Shultz SJ. Efficacy of the star excursion balance tests in detecting reach deficits in subjects with chronic ankle instability. Journal of Athletic Training, 2002;37(4):501.

25. Khuman R, Surbala L, Kamlesh T. Dynamic Postural Control Assessment with Star Excursion Balance Test among Chronic Ankle Instability and Healthy Asymptomatic Participants. International Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, 2014;3(2):55–64. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijhrs.000000053

26. Melam GR, Alhusaini AA, Perumal V, Buragadda S, Kaur K. Comparison of static and dynamic balance between football and basketball players with chronic ankle instability. Saudi Journal of Sports Medicine, 2016;16(3):199. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-6308.187557

27. Sousa AS, Leite J, Costa B, Santos R. Bilateral proprioceptive evaluation in individuals with unilateral chronic ankle instability. Journal of Athletic Training, 2017;52(4):360–7. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-52.2.08

28. Ward S, Pearce AJ, Pietrosimone B, Bennell K, Clark R, Bryant AL. Neuromuscular deficits after peripheral joint injury: a neurophysiological hypothesis. Muscle & Nerve, 2015;51(3):327–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24463

29. Hall EA, Chomistek AK, Kingma JJ, Docherty CL. Balanceand strength-training protocols to improve chronic ankle instability deficits, part II: Assessing patient-reported outcome measures. Journal of Athletic Training, 2018;53(6):578–83. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-387-16

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page