Factors Influencing Malaysian Preschool Teachers Use of the English Language as a Medium of Instruction

Pauline Swee Choo Goh

Abstract

This study investigated Malaysian preschool teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward the use of the English language as a medium of instruction (EMI) and proposed a model of how different variables were related to their use of English in the classrooms. In order to obtain a broad picture of the nature and scope of preschool teachers’ use of EMI, a survey study was undertaken. The research instrument was a questionnaire that was distributed to randomly-selected preschool teachers throughout Malaysia. The process of modeling was based on the empirical data and a theoretical model that was constructed on the basis of the two theoretical aspects, that is self-efficacy and attitudes-behavior relation. The theoretical model served as a bridge between the abstractions from theory and the development of the model. The model suggested that strong self-efficacy influenced preschool teachers’ use of English to teach. In addition, the model also indicated that those preschool teachers with positive attitudes also felt self-efficacious in using English to teach and negative attitudes had the opposite effect. Those preschool teachers who had a positive attitude that teaching using English would be useful for the children perceived that they had greater ability toward handling classroom management issues. In addition, they believed too, that they were confident to use appropriate assessment tasks in the classroom when English was used as the medium of instruction. It would appear that self-efficacy and attitudes were mutually related to preschool teachers’ use of English to teach.

References

Af Wahlberg, A. E., & Poom, L. (2015). An empirical test of nonresponse bias in internet surveys. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1111212

Azman, H. (2016). Implementation and challenges of English language education reform in Malaysian primary schools. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3),65–78. https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2016-2203-05

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.

Block, M., Taliaferro, A., Harris, N., & Krause, J. (2010). Using selfefficacy theory to facilitate inclusion in general physical education. Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance,81(3),4346.https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2010.10598448

Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Cankaya, P. (2017). Challenges in English medium of instruction from the teachers and students' eyes. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 5(4), 830–839. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.2096

Conyers, M., & Wilson, D. (2015). Smart moves: Powering up the brain with physical activity. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(8), 38–42.https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721715583961

Darwish, S. A. (2017). Teachers' attitude toward a foreign language: Factors affecting the target language teaching process. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1),1–8. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijelt.v5n1p1

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet,phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Doll, J., & Ajzen, I. (1992). Accessibility and stability of predictors in the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.754

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Addison Wesley.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Fowler, F. J. (2009). Survey research methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Goh, P. S. C. (2013). Conceptions of competency: A phenomenographic investigation of beginning teachers in Malaysia. The Qualitative Report, 18, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1519

Goh, P. S. C. (2019). Preschool teachers’ perspectives on using English language to teach. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 19(4), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1904-18

Goh, P. S. C., & Blake, D. (2015). Teacher preparation in Malaysia:Needed changes. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1020780

Goh, P. S. C., & Canrinus, E. T. (2019). Preservice teachers’ perception of program coherence and its relationship to their teaching efficacy. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities,27(T2), 27–45.

Goh, P. S. C., Canrinus, E. T., & Wong, K. T. (2020). Preservice teachers’ perspectives about coherence in their teacher education program. Educational Studies, 46(3), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1584856

Goh, P. S. C., Loy, C. L., Abdul-Wahab, W., & Raja Safinas, R.H. (2020). Preschool teachers’ use of English as a medium of instruction: A systematic review of barriers and strategies.Issues in Education Research, 30(3), 943–964.

Goh, P. S. C., Wong, K. T., & Hamzah, M. S. G. (2014). The approaches to teaching inventory: A preliminary validation of the Malaysian translation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n1.6

Goh, P. S. C., Yusuf, Q., & Wong, K. T. (2017). Lived experience:Perceptions of competency of novice teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 20–36.

Gooch, L. (2009, July 8). Malaysia ends use of English in science and math teaching. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/world/asia/09iht-malay.html

Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008). The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Anderson, R. E., & Babin, B. J. (2014).Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Hayduk, L., Cummings, G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H.,& Boulianne, S. (2007). Testing! Testing! One, Two Three –Testing the theory in structural equation models! Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 841–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.001

Hox, J. J., de Leeuw, E. D., & Chang, H. T. (2012). Nonresponseversus measurement error: Are reluctant respondents worth pursuing? Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 113(1), 5–19.https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106311426987