Validity and reliability of assessment instruments for special needs students (AISNS) based on invasion category games in physical education

Mohd Izwan Bin Shahril

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	LB Theory and practice of education
ISSN :	2222-6990
Main Author :	Mohd Izwan Bin Shahril
Additional Authors :	Faizal Hakimi Bin Samsudin Norkhalid Bin Salimin
Title :	Validity and reliability of assessment instruments for special needs students (AISNS) based on invasion category games in physical education

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan
Year of Publication :	2021
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

The aim of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of Assessment Instrument for Special Needs Students (AISNS) based on invasion category games in Physical Education. The design of assessment instrument is based on the PDCA Cycle Model (plan, do, check, act). The process of gaining validity and reliability involves two cycles. The result showed the validity of assessment instrument is r = 0.91 (N = 5) while the reliability is r = 0.97 (N = 6). Based on the findings, AISNS is suitable to be used as a standardized learning assessment instrument to assess the level of Performance Standard for basic skills of invasion category games in Physical Education (Special Education) for Form 2. Keywords: Learning Assessment Instrument, School-Based Assessment, Physical Education, Special Education, Invasion Category Games, Validity, Reliability.

References

Abilla, P. (2014). PDCA Cycle or PDSA Cycle – Which is Right? Accessed from https://www.shmula.com/pdca-cycle-or-pdsa-cycle-which-is-right/13653/

Abu Bakar, N., & Bhasah, A. B. (2008). Penaksiran dalam pendidikan dan sains sosial. Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Hashim, A. (2014). Panduan analisis data secara efisien. Selangor: Dubook Press Sdn. Bhd

Arsaythamby, V., Hariharan, N., K & Ruzlan Md-Ali. (2015). Teachers’ Knowledge and Readiness Towards Implementation of School Based Assessment in Secondary Schools. International Education Studies, 8(11), 193-203. doi:10.5539/ies.v8n11p193

Curriculum Development Division. (2018). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia

Curriculum Development Division. (2016). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah Pendidikan Khas. Pendidikan Jasmani dan Pendidikan Kesihatan. Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Tingkatan 2. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia

Department of Standards Malaysia. (2017). Malaysian Standard MS ISO 9001:2015. Sistem Pengurusan Kualiti – Keperluan (Semakan Kedua). Cyberjaya: Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi.

Abdul Khalil, F., & Awang, M. I. (2016). Isu Kesediaan Guru dalam Amalan Melaksanakan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah. EDUCATUM-Journal of Social Science, 2(2016), 1-7

Jani, J., & Ali, S. K. S. (2012). Ilmu Konten Pedagogi dengan Pelaksanaan Pengajaran Guru dalam Pendidikan Jasmani di Sekolah Menengah Malaysia-Indonesia. Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani. May 2012, 1-13. Accessed from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/GetFinalFile.ashx?file= fd58d3e5-55aa96ca-6e39fe79f7e6.pdf

Saad, L. (2017). Pentaksiran Pembelajaran Kemahiran Asas Bagi Permainan Kategori Serangan Dalam Pendidikan Jasmani Tahun 4. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah

Malaysian Examinations Board. (2014). Kajian Pelaksanaan PBS: Dokumen Standard Prestasi. Kuala Lumpur: Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia

Malaysian Examinations Board. (2013). Kajian PBS: Kefahaman dan Amalan Guru. Kuala Lumpur: Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025: Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga Lepas Menengah. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia

Moen, R., & Norman, C. (2009). Evolution of the PDCA cycle. Accessed from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228475044_Evolution_of_the_PDCA_cycle

Shahril, M. I., Salimin, N., & Elumalai, G. (2015). The Validity and Reliability of ISO Test towards the Performance Assessment of Future Physical Education Teachers in Teaching and Learning Process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 195, 814–820. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.184

Ishak, N. (2011). School based assessment as transformation in educational asessment. Keynote in International Seminar On Measurement and Evaluation (ICMEE 4) Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, 9-12 October

Norkhalid S., Julismah J., Izwan, M. S., & Gunathevan, E. (2015). Validity and reliability of comprehensive assessments for handball and badminton games in physical education. Asian Social Science, 11(23), 12-21.

Norman, C. L. (2016, February 10). Evolution of PDSA and the Difference Between PDSA and PDCA. Diakses daripada https://asqaustin.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/History_of_the_PDSA_Cycle_CN_ASQ_Talk-_2_10_2016_Handout.pdf

Rink, J. E. (2002). Teaching physical education for learning (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Noah, S. M., & Ahmad, J. (2005). Pembinaan modul. Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia

Special Education Division. (2015). Buku Panduan Pengoperasian Program Pendidikan Khas Integrasi. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia

Special Education Unit. (2018). List of School Information. Ipoh, Perak: State Education Department.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page