Abbasi, H. (2020). Physics Virtual Lab (version 1.0) [Mobile application software].

Retrieved from https : // play . google . com / store / apps / details?id = main .

physicvirtuallab&hl=en_US&gl=US

 

Abdul-Rahman, A., Chen, M., & Laidlaw, D. H. (2020). A survey of variables used in

empirical studies for visualization. In Foundations of Data Visualization (pp.

161-179). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34444-3_7

 

Abidin, N. A. S. Z., & Tho, S. W. (2018). The development of an innovative resonance

experiment using smartphones with free mobile software applications for

tertiary education. International Journal of Education and Development Using

Information and Communication Technology, 14(1), 164–176.

 

Abdullah, S., & Majid, F. A. (2013). English language teaching challenges in Malaysia:

Polytechnic lecturers’ experience. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(4), 540-

547.

 

Acheampong, P., Zhiwen, L., Hiran, K. K., Serwaa, O. E., Boateng, F., & Bediako, I.

A. (2018). Examining the intervening role of age and gender on mobile payment

acceptance in Ghana: UTAUT model. Canadian Journal of Applied Science and

Technology, 6(1), 141–151.

 

Adhabi, E., & Anozie, C. B. (2017). Literature review for the type of interview in

qualitative research. International Journal of Education, 9(3), 86-97.

 

Akram, M. (2016). Constructivist Model to Encounter Language Misconceptions, Prior

Knowledge Over Generalizations and Visualization Errors in Electrochemistry

(Doctoral thesis, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Johor Bharu, Malaysia). Retrieved

from https://core.ac.uk/reader/199242530

 

Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). Investigating the effect of learning

styles in a blended e-learning system: An extension of the technology

acceptance model (TAM). Australasian Journal of Educational

Technology, 33(2). 1-23.

 

Ali, Z., & Muhammad, N. N. (2019). Gender Differences in Perceived Usefulness and

Attitudes Towards VocBlast in Learning Specialized Vocabulary.

In Proceedings of the Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social

Sciences (RCSTSS 2016) (pp. 237-245). Springer, Singapore.

 

Ali, M., Ibrahim, N. H., Abdullah, A. H., Surif, J., & Saim, N. (2014). Physics problem

solving strategies and metacognitive skills: force and motion topics. In 2014

IEEE 6th Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED) (pp. 133-138).IEEE.

 

Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2012). Design and Development of Physics Module Based on

Learning Style and Appropriate Technology by Employing Isman Instructional

Design Model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-

TOJET, 11(4), 84-93.

 

Alias, N., DeWitt, D., Rahman, M. N. A., Gelamdin, R. B., Rauf, R. A. A., & Siraj, S.

(2014). Effectiveness of the Biology PTechLS Module in a Felda Science

Centre. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(4), 32–36.

 

Amin, A. K. (2017). Kajian Konseptual Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning

berbasis Web untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Motivasi Belajar. Jurnal

Pendidikan Edutama, 4(2), 51-64.

 

Amin, M., Rezaei, S., & Tavana, F. S. (2015). Gender differences and consumer’s

repurchase intention: the impact of trust propensity, usefulness and ease of use

for implication of innovative online retail. International Journal of Innovation

and Learning, 17(2), 217-233.

 

Arbin, N., Ghani, S. A., Sabri, S. R. M., Hamzah, F. M., Sufahani, S. F., & Razali, S.

N. A. M. (2015). Teaching higher level calculus to the postgraduate students

using a module-based cooperative learning strategy. International Journal of

Technical Research and Applications, 25, 26-29.

 

Ariffin, S. R., Katran, F. A., Badib, A. A. N., & Rashid, N. A. (2011). Validity and

reliability of the Malaysian creativity and innovation instrument (MyCrIn)

using the Rasch measurement model. In Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS

international conference on E-Activities (pp. 59-64). World Scientific and

Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS).

 

Arribas, E., Escobar, I., Suarez, C. P., Najera, A., & Belindez, A. (2015). Measurement

of the magnetic field of small magnets with a smartphone: A very economical

laboratory practice for introductory Physics courses. European Journal of

Physics, 36(6), 65002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/36/6/065002

 

Arslan, K. (2019). Attitude and perceptions of pedagogical formation physical

education students about web 2.0 tools and factors for successful adaptation of

these tools. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(6), 101-114.

doi:10.5281/zenodo.3435208

 

Assaker, G. (2020). Age and gender differences in online travel reviews and usergenerated-

content (UGC) adoption: extending the technology acceptance model

(TAM) with credibility theory. Journal of Hospitality Marketing &

Management, 29(4), 428-449.

 

Azimi, K., Ahmadigol, J., & Rastegarpour, H. (2015). A survey of the effectiveness of

instructional design ADDIE and multimedia on learning key skills of

futsal. Journal of. Educational and Management. Studies, 5(3), 180-186.

 

Baeten, M., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., Parmentier, E., & Vanderbruggen, A. (2016).

Student-centred learning environments: an investigation into student teachers’

instructional preferences and approaches to learning. Learning Environments

Research, 19(1), 43-62.

 

Bahri, H., & Tengku Mahadi, T. S. (2016). The application of mobile devices in the

translation classroom. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(6), 237-

242. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.6p.237

 

Bakar, N. S. A., Maat, S. M., & Rosli, R. (2020). Mathematics Teacher's Self-Efficacy

of Technology Integration and Technological Pedagogical Content

Knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 259-276.

 

Bakar, S. A., Salim, N. R., Ayub, A. F. M., & Gopal, K. (2021). Success Indicators of

Mathematical Problem-Solving Performance Among Malaysian Matriculation

Students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational

Research, 20(3), 97-116.

 

Balakrishnan, V., & Gan, C. L. (2016). Students’ learning styles and their effects on

the use of social media technology for learning. Telematics and Informatics,

33(3), 808–821.

 

Banditvilai, C. (2016). Enhancing students' language skills through blended

learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(3), 220-229.

 

Bandura, A. (2006a). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs

of adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.

 

Bandura, A. (2006b). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on

psychological Science, 1(2), 164-180.

 

Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helping

teachers meet the challenge. New York: Routledge.

 

Barreiro, P. L., & Albandoz, J. P. (2001). Population and sample. Sampling

techniques. Management mathematics for European schools, 1(1), 1-18.

 

Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018). Investigating the impact of blended learning on

academic performance in a first semester college physics course. Journal of

Computers in Education, 5(1), 67-94.

 

Bendall, S., Goldberg, F. et al. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers’ prior

knowledge about light. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30(9), 1169-

1187. doi:10.1002/tea.3660300912.

 

Berliner, D. C. (2004). Expert teachers: Their characteristics, development and

accomplishments. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 200-212.

 

Best, J. W. (1997). Research in education. New Jersey:Prentice Hall

 

Bishop, W. A. (2019). The development of management accounting skills in situations

where practical exposure is limited: The perceptions of training officers in South

Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(4), 20-43.

 

Blizak, D., Chafiqi, F. et al. (2013). What thinks the university’s students about

propagation of light in the vacuum? European Scientific Journal. 9(24), 197-

213.

 

Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with

online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance education, 30(1),

103-116.

 

Bovill, C. (2018). Lectures and Legoland®: Recapturing the excitement of

learning. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift, 13(24), 1-4.

 

Brame, C. (2016). Active learning. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching.

Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/active-learning/.

 

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. London: Springer

Science.

 

Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2014). Instructional design models. In Handbook of

research on educational communications and technology (pp. 77-87). New

York, NY, Springer.

 

Branson, R. K., Rayner, G. T., Cox, J. L., Furman, J. P., & King, F. J.

(1975). Interservice procedures for instructional systems development.

executive summary and model. Florida State Univ Tallahassee Center For

Educational Technology.

 

Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What Is

STEM? A Discussion About Conceptions of STEM in Education and

Partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x

 

Briz-Ponce, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., & García-Peñalvo, F.

J. (2017). Learning with mobile technologies – Students’ behavior. Computers

in Human Behavior, 72, 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.027

 

Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering

education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-

387.

 

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction (Vol. 59). London: Harvard

University Press.

 

Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2018). New technology in health education: Nursing students'

application of mobile technology in the classroom in Ghana. Interactive

Technology and Smart Education, 15(1), 46-58.

 

Burhan, N. M., Tamuri, A. H., & Nordin, N. M. (2017). Penerimaan modul

pembelajaran digital berasaskan strategi blended learning (e-CITAC) dalam

kursus TITAS. O-JIE: Online Journal of Islamic Education, 4(1), 1-16.

 

Burton, J. K., Moore, D. M. (M.), & Magliaro, S. G. (2004). Behaviourism and

Instructional Technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on

educational communications and technology (p. 3–36). Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates Publishers.

 

Camarao, M. K. G., & Nava, F. J. G. (2017, November). High school students’

difficulties in Physics. In A paper presented at the National Conference on

Research in Teacher Education (NCRTE), Quezon City, The Philippines.

 

Campbell, P. C. (2014). Modifying ADDIE: Incorporating new technologies in library

instruction. Public Services Quarterly, 10(2), 138-149.

 

Carolin, B., Sahala, S., & Mursyid, S. (2016): Remediasi Miskonsepsi Pembentukan

Bayangan pada Cermin Menggunakan Picture And Picture Berbantuan (Gnt) di

SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 5(12).

 

Cavanagh, M. (2011). Students’ experiences of active engagement through cooperative

learning activities in lectures. Active learning in higher education, 12(1), 23-33.

 

Chamberlain, S. A., Duggleby, W., Teaster, P., & Estabrooks, C. (2020).

Characteristics and unmet care needs of unbefriended residents in long-term

care: a qualitative interview study. Aging & Mental Health, 24(4), 659-667.

 

Chen, C. C., Lin, H. S., & Lin, M. L. (2002). Developing a two-tier diagnostic

instrument to assess high school students' understanding-the formation of

images by a plane mirror. Proceedings-National Science Council Republic of

China Part D Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 106-121.

 

Chen, L. L. (2016). A model for effective online instructional design. Literacy

Information and Computer Education Journal, 6(2), 2303-2308.

 

Cheng, L. H. (2020). Penggunaan modul Smar-Flip ke arah meningkatkan kemahiran

pelajar menyelesaikan masalah algebra dan statistik. Jurnal Penyelidikan

Dedikasi, 17, 18-36.

 

Chiu, A., Price, C. A., & Ovrahim, E. (2015). Supporting elementary and middle school

STEM education at the whole school level: A review of the literature. In NARST

2015 Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.

 

Christidou, V. (2006). Greek students’ Science-related interests and experiences:

Gender differences and correlations. International Journal of Science

Education, 28 (10), 1181-1199.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2006). Asas statistik penyelidikan buku 2. Malaysia: Mc Graw Hill

Education.

 

Cohen, S. M., Jacobson, B. H., Garrett, C. G., Noordzij, J. P., Stewart, M. G., Attia, A.,

... & Cleveland, T. F. (2007). Creation and validation of the singing voice

handicap index. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 116(6), 402-

406.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed

Methods Research 2009, 3(2), 95-108. doi: 10.1177/1558689808330883

 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating

Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 4th. University of Nebraska: Pearson.

 

Cridland, E. K., Jones, S. C., Caputi, P. & Magee, C. A. (2015). Qualitative research

with families living with autism spectrum disorder: recommendations for

conducting semi structured interviews. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental

Disability, 40(1), 78-91. doi:10.3109/13668250.2014.964191

 

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of

tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

 

Curriculum Development Division (CDD). (2012). Integrated Curriculum for

Secondary School. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

 

Curriculum Development Division (CDD). (2016). Implementation Guide for Science,

Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in Teaching and Learning.

Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia. Retrieved from:

http://bpk.moe.gov.my/

 

Curriculum Development Division (CDD). (2018). KSSM Dokumen Standard

Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Fizik Tingkatan 4 &5. Putrajaya: Ministry of

Education Malaysia.

 

Daniels, H. (2016). Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York: Routledge.

 

Davis, F.D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new enduser

information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation,

Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

 

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance

of information technology. Management Information System Quarterly, (13)3,

319-340.

 

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer

technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science,

35(8), 982–1003.

 

Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of

experts. Applied nursing research, 5(4), 194-197.

 

Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Kurniawan, W., Anwar, K., &

Lumbantoruan, A. (2019). Students' Perceptions of Electronic's Module in

Physics Practicum. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(2), 288-294.

 

Darussalam, G., & Hussin, S. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam

pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

 

Dhamija, N., Kanchan, M., & Education, M. M. C. (2014). Effectiveness of self

learning modules on the achievement and retention of undergraduate students

in commerce. Educationia Confab, 3(2), 26-32.

 

Dedes, C., and K. Ravanis. 2009. Teaching image formation by extended light sources:

The use of a model derived from the history of Science. Research in Science

Education, 39, 57–73.

 

Dennen, V. P., & Hao, S. (2014). Intentionally mobile pedagogy: The M-COPE

framework for mobile learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and

Education, 23(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.943278

 

DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). London:

Sage publications.

 

Diani, R., Kesuma, G. C., Diana, N., Anggraini, R. D., & Fujiani, D. (2019). The

development of Physics module with the scientific approach based on islamic

literacy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 012034.

 

Dick, W., & Reiser, R. A. (1989). Planning effective instruction. United States: Prentice

Hall.

 

Donnelly, J., Magnani, N., & Robinson, K. (2016). Dumpster Optics: teaching and

learning optics without a kit. Optics Education and Outreach IV, 9946, 99460G.

https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2238930

 

Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social Science research. Education

Research and perspectives, 38(1), 105.

 

Dumpit, D. Z., & Fernandez, C. J. (2017). Analysis of the use of social media in Higher

Education Institutions (HEIs) using the Technology Acceptance

Model. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher

Education, 14(1), 2-16.

 

Du Plessis, A. (2016). Student-teachers' pedagogical beliefs: Learner-centred or

teacher-centred when using ICT in the Science classroom?. Journal of Baltic

Science Education, 15(2). 140-158.

 

Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2013). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms

(9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

 

El Kah, A., & Lakhouaja, A. (2018). Developing effective educative games for Arabic

children primarily dyslexics. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6),

2911-2930.

 

Etikan, I. Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling

and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied

Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

 

Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Gunawan, G., Sari, N., & Ratu, T. (2020). Enhancing

students ability in analyzing image formation on lens and mirror using Ray

Optics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1471(1), 012061.

 

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviourism, cognitivism, constructivism:

Comparing critical features from an instructional design

perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43-71.

 

Evans, C., & Lewis, J. (2018). Analysing semi-structured interviews using thematic

analysis: exploring voluntary civic participation among adults. SAGE

Publications Limited.

 

Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2018). Learning from museums. London: Rowman &

Littlefield.

 

Faryadi, Q. (2007). Instructional Design Models: What a Revolution!. Online

Submission. Electrochemistry (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Universiti

Teknologi MARA, Malaysia). (ED495711) Retrieved from

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495711.pdf

 

Fatmawati, E. (2015). Technology Acceptance model (TAM) untuk menganalisis

penerimaan terhadap sistem informasi di perpustakaan. Jurnal Ilmu

Perpustakaan dan Informasi (e-Journal), 9(1), 1-13.

 

Favale, F., & Bondani, M. (2013). Misconceptions about optics: An effect of

misleading explanations?. In Education and Training in Optics and

Photonics (p. EThI4). Optical Society of America.

 

Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Emerging perspectives on learning,

teaching, and technology, 41(4), 47-56.

 

Fraenkel, J. L., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate

research in education eighth edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

 

Gagne, R. M., & Dick, W. (1983). Instructional psychology. Annual review of

psychology, 34(1), 261-295.

 

Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners' knowledge in optics: interpretation, structure

and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57-88.

 

Garzón, I., De Cock, M., Zuza, K., van Kampen, P., & Guisasola, J. (2014). Probing

university students’ understanding of electromotive force in electricity.

American Journal of Physics, 82(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4833637

 

Ghani, S. A., & Saad, N. S. (2012). Development of Mathematics Teaching and

Learning Model Based on Metacognitive. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan

Matematik Malaysia, 2(1), 23-37.

 

Ghazali, D., & Sufean, H. (2016). Research Methodology in Education. Kuala Lumpur:

University of Malaya Publisher.

 

Gibbons, A. S., Boling, E., & Smith, K. M. (2014). Instructional design models.

In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp.

607-615). New York, NY. Springer.

 

Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education:

Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media.

Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002

 

Gilbert, G. E., & Prion, S. (2016). Making sense of methods and measurement:

Lawshe's Content Validity Index. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(12), 530-

531.

 

Göksu, I., Özcan, K. V., Çakir, R., & Göktas, Y. (2017). Content Analysis of Research

Trends in Instructional Design Models: 1999-2014. Journal of Learning

Design, 10(2), 85-109.

 

Gordon, J., & Zemke, R. (2000). The attack on ISD. Training, 37(4), 42-45.

 

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. The handbook of blended learning:

Global perspectives, local designs, 1, 3-21.

 

Grigorovitch, A. (2014). Children’s misconceptions and conceptual change in Physics

Education: the concept of light. Journal: Journal of Advance in Natural

Sciences, 1 (1).

 

Gustinasari, M., Lufri, L., & Ardi, A. (2017). Development of Module Learning Based

on Concept with Exampel on Cell Material for Students SMA. Bioeducation

Journal, 1(1), 61-74.

 

Hakim, C. (2000). Research Design: Successful designs in social and economic

research. Abingdon: Routledge.

 

Halim, L., Rahman, N. A., Ramli, N. A. M., & Mohtar, L. E. (2018). Influence of

students’ STEM self-efficacy on STEM and Physics career choice. In AIP

Conference Proceedings 1923(1), 020001. AIP Publishing LLC.

 

Handayani, S. L. (2018). Perbandingan Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa PGSD UHAMKA

Materi Optik Geometri. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1), 44-56.

 

Handeland, T. (2018). Choice Intervention in an American Indian/Alaska Native Head

Start Program (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University Global).

 

Hannum, E. (2005). Market transition, educational disparities, and family strategies in

rural China: New evidence on gender stratification and

development. Demography, 42(2), 275-299.

 

Harchay, A., Cheniti-Belcadhi, L., & Braham, R. (2017). MobiSWAP: Personalized

mobile assessment tool based on semantic web and web Services. In 2017

IEEE/ACS 14th International Conference on Computer Systems and

Applications (AICCSA) (pp. 1406-1413). IEEE.

 

Harwell, M. R.& Gatti, G. G. (2001). Rescaling ordinal data to interval data in

educational research. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 105–

131. doi:10.3102/00346543071001105

 

Hashim, S. R. (2017). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan modul pengajaran dan

pembelajaran tajuk jatuh bebas dan gerakan luncuran dan keberkesanannya

terhadap pencapaian pelajar (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Pendidikan

Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia). Retrieved from

http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jd/article/view/10462

 

Havice, W., Havice, P., Waugaman, C., & Walker, K. (2018). Evaluating the

effectiveness of integrative STEM education: Teacher and administrator

professional development. Journal of Technology Education, 29(2), 73-90.

 

Healey, A., Knapp, M., Astin, J., Beecham, J., Kemp, R., Anthony, D., & Kirov, G.

(1998). Cost-effectiveness evaluation of compliance therapy for people with

psychosis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 172(5), 420-424.

 

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D. Smaldino (1996). Instructional media and

technologies for learning. United States. Prentice-Hall.

 

Henderson, R., Stewart, G., Stewart, J., Michaluk, L., & Traxler, A. (2017). Exploring

the gender gap in the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism. Physical

Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020114.

 

Hochberg, K., Gröber, S., Kuhn, J., & Müller, A. (2014). The spinning disc: Studying

radial acceleration and its damping process with smartphone acceleration

sensors. Physics Education, 49(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-

9120/49/2/137

 

Hoeling, B. M. (2012). Interactive online optics modules for the college Physics

course. American Journal of Physics, 80(4), 334-338.

https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3677652

 

Hom, S. N. H., & Talib, C. A. (2020). Integration of computational thinking skills in

teaching and learning programming using the EZ-Prog among matriculation

student. Solid State Technology, 63(1s), 670-679.

 

Hubber, P. 2006. Year 12 students’ mental models of the nature of light. Research in

Science Education, 36, 419–439.

 

Hussin, Z., Siraj, S., Darusalam, G., & Salleh, N. H. M. (2017). Kajian Model Blended

Learning dalam Jurnal Terpilih: Satu Analisa Kandungan. JuKu: Jurnal

Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 3(1), 1-6.

 

Hung, L. J., Abdullah, F. A. P., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2013). Aplikasi konsep fizik

dalam menyelesaikan masalah yang berasaskan stem bagi pelajar tingkatan

enam atas. In 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable

Education (pp. 470-481).

 

Idris, N. (2005). Pedagogi Dalam Pendidikan Matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan

Publication & Distributors Sdn Bhd.

 

Imenda, S. (2014). Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual

frameworks?. Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 185-195.

 

International Standards Organization. 1994. Ergonomic requirements for office work

with visual display terminals. Part 11: Guidance on usability (ISO DIS 9241-

11). London: International Standards Organization

 

Irwansyah, F. S., Lubab, I., Ramdhani, I. F. M. A., & Farida, I. (2017). Designing

interactive electronic module in chemistry lessons. Journal of Physics:

Conference Series, 895(1), 1-7. doi :10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012009

 

Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation. San Diego,

CA:Educational and Industrial Testing Services.

 

Ishak, N. A., Jamil, H., & Razak, N. A. (2016). Malaysian Pre-University Students'

Level Of Intellectual Quality. GSTF Journal on Education (JEd), 3(2).

 

Ismail, A. B., Sawang, S., & Zolin, R. (2018). Entrepreneurship education pedagogy:

teacher-student-centred paradox. Education+ Training, 60(2), 168-184.

 

Jackson, S. L. (2014). Research methods: A modular approach. Belmont, CA: Cengage

Learning.

 

Jeng, J. (2005). Usability assessment of academic digital libraries: effectiveness,

efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability. Libri (Copenhagen), 55(2-3), 96-121.

doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2005.96

 

Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: sample size for

pilot studies. Educational and psychological measurement, 70(3), 394-400.

 

Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention

to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance

model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59.

 

Juvova, A., Chudy, S., Neumeister, P., Plischke, J., & Kvintova, J. (2015). Reflection

of Constructivist Theories in Current Educational Practice. Universal Journal

of Educational Research, 3(5), 345–349.

https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.030506

 

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic

methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semistructured

interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.

 

Kaltakci-Gurel, D. (2018). Development Of An Optics Interest And Experience Scale

(Oies) And Exploring Gender Differences In Prospective Teachers’ Interest

And Experience. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 935.

 

Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2016). Identifying pre-service

Physics teachers’ misconceptions and conceptual difficulties about Geometrical

Optics. European Journal of Physics, 37(4), 045705.

 

Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and

application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service Physics teachers’

misconceptions about Geometrical Optics. Research In Science &

Technological Education, 35(2), 238-260.

 

Kantar, M., & Doğan, M. (2015). Development of mobile learning material for 9th

grade Physics course to use in FATIH Project: Force and Motion Unit.

Participatory Educational Research, spi15(2), 99–109.

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.15.spi.2.12

 

Kasim, N. H., & Ahmad, C. N. C. (2018). PRO-STEM module: The development and

validation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social

Sciences, 8(1), 728-739.

 

Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning

from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20(1),1–17.

https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14406

 

Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. L. (2014). Engaging Students In STEM Education.

Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.

https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v27i2.a.1

 

Kim, A. K., & Davies, J. (2014). A teacher’s perspective on student centred learning:

Towards the development of best practice in an undergraduate tourism course.

Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 14(1), 6–14.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2013.12.001

 

Kim, H. (2015). Effects of Science and Engineering Practices on Science Achievement

and Attitudes of Diverse Students including ELLs. NABE Journal of Research

and Practice, 6(1), 231-253. doi: 10.1080/26390043.2015.12067789

 

Kim, H., & Yoon, M. (2014). Adopting smartphone-based blended learning: An

Experimental study of the implementation of Kakao-Talk and

Mocafe. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 86-111

 

Kiong, T. T., Azman, M. N. A., Yunos, J. M., Heong, Y. M., Mohamad, M. M.,

Mohamad, B., & Othman, W. (2013). The development and evaluation of the

qualities of thinking skills module. Journal of Technical Education and

Training, 5(1), 52-67.

 

Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and

development. New Jersey, FT press.

 

Konting, M., M. (2010). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan, edisi ke 8. Kuala Lumpur:

Dewan bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Köse, U. (2010). A blended learning model supported with Web 2.0

technologies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2794-2802.

 

Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research in interest in Science: Theories, methods

and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33 (1), 27-50.

 

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research

activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

 

Kristanto, A., Mustaji, Mariono, A., Sulistiowati, & Nuryati, D. W. (2018). Developing

media module proposed to editor in editorial division. Journal of Physics:

Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012054

 

Kristiawan, Y. (2015). Computer-based instructional materials integrative analysis

capabilities to improve students in geometric optics and optical

equipment. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 2(4), 230-237.

 

Ku, Y. C., Hu, P. C., Wang, G. Y., & Peng, C. H. (2018). Analysis of the Key Factors

of BYOD for Learning. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information System 2018

Proceedings (p. 284). https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/284

 

Kwok, D., & Yang, S. (2017). Evaluating the intention to use ICT collaborative tools

in a social constructivist environment. International Journal of Educational

Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 2-14.

 

Labov, J. B., Reid, A. H., & Yamamoto, K. R. (2010). Integrated biology and

undergraduate Science education: a new biology education for the twenty-first

century?. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(1), 10-16.

 

Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2013). Design expertise. New York, NY: Routledge.

 

Lavonen, J., Byman, R., Juuti, K., Meisalo, V., & Uitto, A. (2005). Pupil interest in

Physics: A survey in Finland. NorDiNa, Nordic Studies in Science Education,

2, 72-85.

 

Lederman, N. G., & Abell, S. K. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of research on Science

education, volume II (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Routledge.

 

Li, K. M. (2015). Learning styles and perceptions of student teachers of computersupported

collaborative learning strategy using wikis. Australasian Journal of

Educational Technology, 31(1), 32–50.

 

Li, C., & Zhou, T. (2017). A questionnaire-based study on Chinese university students'

demotivation to learn English. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 128-135.

 

Lian, J. W., & Yen, D. C. (2014). Online shopping drivers and barriers for older adults:

Age and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 133-143.

 

Ling, W. S. Y., Lee, T. T., & Tho, S. W. (2017). A technological acceptance of remote

laboratory in chemistry education. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning

and Teaching ,18(2), 1-20.

 

Lohr, L. (1998). Using ADDIE to design a web-based training interface. In Society for

Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp.

452-455). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education

(AACE).

 

Lok, W. F., & Yau, P. W. (2020). A case study of direct assessment of students’

manipulative skills in chemistry practical: Perspective of lecturers. Asian

Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 10-17.

 

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing

research. 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-

00017

 

Magliaro, S. G., & Shambaugh, N. (2006). Student models of instructional

design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(1), 83-106.

 

Magnani, N., & Donnelly, J. (2015, June). Teaching reflection to teachers and students.

In Education and Training in Optics and Photonics (p. ETM08). Optical

Society of America. 9793, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2223185

 

Mandari, H. E., & Chong, Y. L. (2018). Gender and age differences in rural farmers’

intention to use m-government services. Government: An International Journal,

14(3), 217–237. doi:10.1504/ EG.2018.093406

 

Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature

review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1),

81–95. doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

 

Mastuang, M., Misbah, M., Yahya, A., & Mahtari, S. (2019). Developing the Physics

module containing Quranic verses to train the local wisdom character. Journal

of Physics: IOP Conference Series, 1171(1), 1-7

 

Mathew Myers, M. J., & Halpin, R. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes and use of multimedia

technology in the classroom: Constructivist-based professional development

training for school districts. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(4),

133-140.

 

Matore, M. E. E. M., Khairani, A. Z., & Razak, N. A. (2015). The influence of AQ on

the academic achievement among malaysian polytechnic

students. International Education Studies, 8(6), 69-74.

 

Matriculation Division. (2019). Bahagian Matrikulasi. Putrajaya: Ministry of

Education Malaysia. Retrieved from: http://moe.gov.my/

 

Matud, M. P., Rodríguez, C., & Grande, J. (2007). Gender differences in creative

thinking. Personality and individual differences, 43(5), 1137-1147.

 

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach: An

Interactive Approach. United States: SAGE publications.

 

May, A. (2018). Instructional Design Models: Comparing ADDIE, Bloom, Gagne, &

Merrill. Retrieved from https://www.dashe.com/blog/instructional-designmodels-

comparing-addie-bloom-gagne-merrill

 

McCrea, B. (2015). 9 IT best practices for BYOD districts: Districts with successful

bring your own device programs share their key strategies for rolling out and

managing student-owned devices in school. The Journal (Technological

Horizons in Education, 42(1), 26

 

McGriff, S. J. (2000). Instructional system design (ISD): Using the ADDIE

model. Retrieved June, 10 (2003), 513-553. from

https://www.lib.purdue.edu/sites/default/files/directory/butler38/ADDIE.pdf

 

McCutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2015). A systematic review

evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face‐to‐face learning of

clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of advanced

nursing, 71(2), 255-270.

 

Milton, K. (2002). Introduction to Geometrical Optics. World Scientific.

 

Ministry of Education. (MOE). (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025:

Preliminary Report – Executive Summary. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education

Malaysia. https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/media-cetak/penerbitan/1813-

pppm-2013-2025/file

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE), (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-

2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE), (2018). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan

Malaysia 2013-2025. Laporan Tahunan 2018. Putrajaya: Kementerian

Pendidikan Malaysia. https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/mediacetak/

penerbitan/pppm-2013-2025-pendidikan-prasekolah-hingga-lepasmenengah/

laporan-tahunan-2018/3284-laporan-tahunan-eng/file

 

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A

framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-

1054.

 

Mohd Noah, S., & Ahmad, J. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul

latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang, Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia

Publisher.

 

Mok, S. S. (1993). Pengajaran Matematik Untuk Kursus Perguruan. Kuala Lumpur:

Kumpulan Budiman Sdn Bhd.

 

Moradmand, N., Datta, A., & Oakley, G. (2014). The design and implementation of an

educational multimedia mathematics software: Using ADDIE to guide

Instructional System Design. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 4(1),

37-49.

 

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2019). Designing

effective instruction. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

 

Mota, J. M., Ruiz-Rube, I., Dodero, J. M., & Arnedillo-Sánchez, I. (2018). Augmented

reality mobile app development for all. Computers & Electrical

Engineering, 65, 250-260.

 

Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor

analytic study. Distance education, 26(1), 29-48.

 

Muis, K. R., & Gierus, B. (2014). Beliefs about knowledge, knowing, and learning:

Differences across knowledge types in Physics. The Journal of Experimental

Education, 82(3), 408-430.

 

Murad, A. & Abdullah, N., (2016). Pembangunan modul peta pemikiran i-think bagi

mata pelajaran sains tahun 5 sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains &

Matematik Malaysia, 6(2), 44–53.

 

Murni, D., Helma, H., & Mirna, M. (2020). Efektivitas Penggunaan Bahan Ajar

Kalkulus Berbasis ICT Terintegrasi Masalah Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan

Aktivitas, Motivasi, dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Eksakta

Pendidikan, 4(2), 171-178.

 

Nagpal, S., & Kumar, D. (2020). A thematic analysis of instructional design

models. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(18), 1641-1650.

 

Nasohah, U. N., Gani, M. I. B. A., & Shaid, N. B. M. S. (2015). Model ADDIE dalam

proses reka bentuk modul pengajaran: Bahasa Arab tujuan khas di Universiti

Sains Islam Malaysia sebagai contoh. In Proceedings of the International

Seminar on Language Teaching ISeLT 2015 (pp. 4-5).

 

National Research Council. (NRC) (2012). A framework for K-12 Science education:

Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: National

Academies Press.

 

Novianti, A. V., &, Sarkim (T. (2017)Pemahaman Siswa SMA Kelas XI IPA Tahun

Ajaran 2016/2017 di Kabupaten Wonogiri dan Kecamatan Sintang tentang

Pemantulan pada Cermin Datar dan Cermin Lengkung. In Prosiding SNFA

(Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Aplikasinya) (Vol. 2, pp. 25-35).

 

Oluwatayo, J. A. (2012). Validity and reliability issues in educational research. Journal

of Educational and Social Research, 2(2), 391-391.

 

Ong, E. T., Ayob, A., Ibrahim, M. N., Adnan, M., Shariff, J., & Ishak, N. (2016). The

effectiveness of an in-service training of early childhood teachers on STEM

integration through Project-Based Inquiry Learning (PIL). Journal of Turkish

Science Education, 13, 44-58.

 

Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding

university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of

Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.

 

Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students' behavioral intention

to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British

journal of educational technology, 43(4), 592-605.

 

Park, E., Baek, S., Ohm, J., & Chang, H. J. (2014). Determinants of player acceptance

of mobile social network games: An application of extended technology

acceptance model. Telematics and Informatics, 31(1), 3-15

 

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

 

Palupi, F. (2017). Developing English learning material for speaking skill based on

ADDIE. Premise: Journal of English Education, 6(1), 29-41.

 

Peterson, C. (2003). Bringing ADDIE to life: Instructional design at its best. Journal of

Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(3), 227-241.

 

Petrova, K., & Li, C. (2009). Focus and setting in mobile learning research: A review

of the literature. Communications of the IBIMA,10(26), 219 - 226

 

Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of intelligence in children (Vol. 8, No. 5, p. 18). New

York: International Universities Press. Retrieved from

https://www.bxScience.edu/ourpages/auto/2014/11/16/50007779/Piaget%20W

hen%20Thinking%20Begins10272012_0000.pdf

 

Piaget, J. (1959). Language and thought of the child (M. Grabain, Trans.). New York:

Humanities Press.

 

Piskurich, M. G. (2006). Rapid Instructional Design; Learning ID Fast and Right (2nd

ed.). United States of America: John Wiley & Son, Inc.

 

Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of

content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing &

health, 30(4), 459-467.

 

Purzer, Ş., Goldstein, M. H., Adams, R. S., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2015). An

exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with

scientific explanations. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(9).1-12.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0019-7

 

Quille, K., Culligan, N., & Bergin, S. (2017). Insights on Gender Differences in CS1:

A Multi-institutional, Multi-variate Study. In Proceedings of the 2017 acm

conference on innovation and technology in computer Science education (pp.

263-268). https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059048

 

Quinn, C. N. (2011). Designing mLearning: Tapping into the mobile revolution for

organizational performance. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

 

Radzali, U. S., Mohd-Yusof, K., & Phang, F. A. (2018). Changing the conception of

teaching from teacher-centred to student-centred learning among engineering

lecturers. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 20(2),120-126

 

Rahim, F. (2017). Pemerkasaan Ulul Albab Melalui Modul STEM bersepadu

STEMind. O-JIE: Online Journal of Islamic Education, 3, 1-12.

 

Rahman, M., Abd, J., & Ismail, M. (2014). Development and evaluation of the

effectiveness of computer-assisted Physics instruction. International Education

Studies, 7(13), 14-22.

 

Rahman, M., Abdul, B. H., Daud, K. A. M., Jusoff, K., & Ghani, N. A. A. (2009).

Project Based Learning (PjBL) practices at Politeknik Kota Bharu,

Malaysia. International Education Studies, 2(4), 140-148.

 

Ramadhan, S., Asri, Y., & Indriyani, V. (2018). Learning module design writing

argumentative text based problem-based learning. Advances in Social Science,

Education and Humanities Research, 263, 194-200.

 

Rath, G. (2018). Elementary optics lab with smartphones and instant messaging.

In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1076(1), 012012).

 

Rau, M. A. (2017). How do students learn to see concepts in visualizations? Social

learning mechanisms with physical and virtual representations. Journal of

Learning Analytics, 4(2), 240–263. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2017.42.16

 

Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., & Pardos, Z. (2014). How should intelligent

tutoring systems sequence multiple graphical representations of fractions? A

multi-methods study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in

Education, 24(2), 125-161.

 

Richey, R. C., & Seels, B. (1994). Defining a Field: A Case Study of the Development

of the 1994 Definition of Instructional Technology. Educational Media and

Technology Yearbook, 20, 2-17.

 

Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003).

Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social

work research. Social work research, 27(2), 94-104.

 

Sahin, M. (2019). Classroom response systems as a formative assessment tool:

Investigation into students' pperceived usefulness and behavioural

intention. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(4), 693-

705.

 

Saim, N., Ali, M., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2015, December). Proses Pembinaan Modul Pro-

Mc Physics: Fasa Analisis dan Reka Bentuk bagi Model Reka Bentuk

Pengajaran ADDIE. Paper presented at International Education Postgraduate

Seminar (IEPS) Johor Bahru, Johor. http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62108

/1/MarlinaAli2015_ProsesPembinaanModulPro-McPhysics.pdf

 

Sakarji, S. R., Nor, K. B. M., Razali, M. M., Talib, N., Ahmad, N., & Saferdin, W. A.

A. W. M. (2019). Investigating student’s acceptance of e-learning using

technology acceptance model among diploma in office management and

technology students at UiTM Melaka. Journal of Information, 4(13), 13-26.

 

Saleh, S. (2014). Malaysian students' motivation towards physics learning. European

Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(4), 223-232.

 

Sanders, M. (2009). Integrative STEM education: primer. The Technology

Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.

 

Santrock, J.W. (2011). Educational Psychology. New York: McGraw Hill.

 

Sari, S. A., & Sakdiah, H. (2016). The development of mind mapping media in flood

material using ADDIE Model. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(1), 53-

62.

 

Sarrab, M., Al Shibli, I., & Badursha, N. (2016). An empirical study of factors driving

the adoption of mobile learning in Omani higher education. International

Review of research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4), 331-349.

 

Sazilah, S., & Faizal, N.L.A. (2017). Development and evaluation of form three

mathematics i-Think module (Mi-T3) on algebraic formulae topic. In AIP

Conference Proceedings, 1847, 030017. AIP Publishing LLC

 

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model

(TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining

teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers &

Education, 128, 13-35.

 

Schwabe, G., & Göth, C. (2005). Mobile learning with a mobile game: design and

motivational effects. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 204-216.

 

Sencar, S., & Eryılmaz, A. (2004). Factors mediating the effect of gender on ninthgrade

Turkish students’ misconceptions concerning electric circuits. Journal of

Research in Science Teaching, 41 (6), 603-616.

 

Setambah, M. A. B., & Adnan, M. (2016) Development, Validity and Reliability

Adventure Based Learning Module in Fundamental Statistics. In Proceeding of

The International Conference on Education and Higher Order Thinking Skills

(ICE-HOTS) 2016 (pp. 396-405).

 

Shahali, E. H. M., Ismail, I., & Halim, L. (2017). STEM education in Malaysia: Policy,

trajectories and initiatives. Asian Research Policy Science and Technology

Trends, 122-133.

 

Shaheen, S., & Khatoon, S. (2017). Impact of ICT enriched modular approach on

academic achievement of biology students. Journal of Research & Reflections

in Education (JRRE), 11(1).

 

Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007) A Theory of Learning for the Mobile

Age. In R. Andrews and C. Haythornthwaite (eds.) The Sage Handbook of

Elearning Research (pp. 221-247). London: Sage.

 

Shen, C. W., Ho, J. T., Kuo, T. C., & Luong, T. H. (2017). Behavioral intention of using

virtual reality in learning. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference

on World Wide Web Companion (pp. 129-137).

 

Shen, W., Liu, C., Shi, C., & Yuan, Y. (2015). Gender differences in creative

thinking. Advances in Psychological Science, 23(8), 1380-1389.

 

Shi, J., Luo, D., Weng, H., Zeng, X. T., Lin, L., Chu, H., & Tong, T. (2020). Optimally

estimating the sample standard deviation from the five‐number

summary. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(5), 641-654.

 

Shih, R. C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English

writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended

learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5).

 

Shiland, T. W. (1999). Constructivism: The implications for laboratory work. Journal

of Chemical Education, 76(1), 107-109.

 

Shorfuzzaman, M., & Alhussein, M. (2016). Modeling learners’ readiness to adopt

mobile learning: A perspective from a GCC higher education institution. Mobile

Information Systems, 1(1), 1-10.

 

Siddiqui, S., Thomas, M., & Soomro, N. N. (2020). Technology integration in

education: source of intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy and

performance. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(1), 11-22.

 

Siregar, N. (2018, October). The influence teacher teaching with model ADDIE to

improve learning outcomes of English language study students. In Proceedings

of The First International Seminar on English LanguageTeaching of

Nommensen, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, English Education

Study Program Nommensen HKBP University Pematangsiantar 2018 (pp. 191

– 197)

 

Smith, L. (Ed.). (2002). Critical readings on Piaget. New York: Routledge.

 

Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design. Oklahoma. John Wiley &

Sons.

 

Smith, K. A., Douglas, T. C., & Cox, M. F. (2009). Supportive teaching and learning

strategies in STEM education. New Directions for Teaching and

Learning, 2009(117), 19-32.

 

Snetinová, M., Kácovský, P., & Machalická, J. (2018). Hands-on experiments in the

interactive Physics laboratory: students’ intrinsic motivation and

understanding. CEPS Journal, 8(1), 55-75.

 

Sokoloff, D. R. (2015). Active Learning Strategies for Introductory Light and Optics.

The Physics Teacher, 54(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4937966

 

Song, Y. J., Lee, J. H., Shin, H. C., Lee, K. H., Suh, K., Kang, J. R., ... & Oh, S. C.

(2016, December). Highly functional and reliable 8Mb STT-MRAM embedded

in 28nm logic. In 2016 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting

(IEDM) (pp. 27-2). IEEE.

 

Song, Y. (2016). “We found the ‘black spots’ on campus on our own”: development of

inquiry skills in primary Science learning with BYOD (Bring Your Own

Device). Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 291–305.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1113707

 

Soto, V. J. (2013). Which Instructional Design Models Are Educators Using To Design

Virtual World Instruction? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,

9(3), 364–376.

 

Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2014). Technology-enhanced Learning in Science,

Technology, and Mathematics Education: Results on Supporting Student

Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 946–950.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.325

 

Stefaniak, J., & Xu, M. (2020). An Examination of the Systemic Reach of Instructional

Design Models: a Systematic Review. TechTrends, 64(5), 710-719.

 

Stewart, B. L., Waight, C. L., Marcella, W., Norwood, M. M., & Ezell, S. D. (2004).

Formative and summative evaluation of online courses. Quarterly Review of

Distance Education, 5(2). 101-109

 

Stuckey, H. L. (2013). Three types of interviews: Qualitative research methods in social

health. Journal of Social Health and Diabetes, 1(2), 56-59.

https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-0656.115294

 

Suana, W., Maharta, N., Nyeneng, I. D., & Wahyuni, S. (2017). Design and

implementation of schoology-based blended learning media for basic physics I

course. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1).

 

Suastika, I. K., & Wahyuningtyas, D. T. (2018). Developing Module of Fractional

Numbers using Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach. Pancaran

Pendidikan, 7(1).

 

Sujarwanto, E., & Ibrahim, M. (2019). Attitude, Knowledge, and Application of STEM

Owned by Science Teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1),

012096. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012096

 

Sulisworo, D., Agustin, S. P., & Sudarmiyati, E. (2016). Cooperative-blended learning

using Moodle as an open source learning platform. International Journal of

Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(2), 187-198.

 

Sun, H. (2020). Gender Differences of Theoretical Physics of Undergraduates Major in

Physics. Higher Education Studies, 10(1), 1-6.

 

Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices

with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis

and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.

 

Talib, O. (2014). Tulis tesis cepat: Teknik efektif dan efisyen. Selangor: MPWS Rich

Resources.

 

Tan, G. W. H., & Ooi, K. B. (2018). Gender and age: Do they really moderate mobile

tourism shopping behavior?. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 1617–1642.

doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.04.009

 

Tangney, S. (2014). Student-centred learning: a humanist perspective. Teaching in

higher Education, 19(3), 266-275.

 

Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2015). A cross‐cultural examination of the impact of

social, organisational and individual factors on educational technology

acceptance between B ritish and L ebanese university students. British Journal

of Educational Technology, 46(4), 739-755.

 

Teo, T., Luan, W. S., & Sing, C. C. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the

intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service

teachers: an application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal

of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 265-280.

 

Tengku Muda, T. E. A., Ishak M, F, & Mat Razali S, (2014). Kemahiran SosialMenurut

Perspektif Islam: Aplikasinya dalam membentuk keperibadian pelajar. Jurnal

Pendidikan, 1(2), 453-464.

 

Tho, S. W., & Yeung, Y. Y. (2014). Innovative use of smartphones for sound resonance

tube experiment. Teaching Science, 60(1), 39-42.

 

Tho, S. W., Chan, K. W., & Yeung, Y. Y. (2015). Technology-enhanced Physics

programme for community-based Science learning: Innovative design and

programme evaluation in a theme park. Journal of Science Education and

Technology, 24(5), 580-594.

 

Tho, S. W., Lee, T. T., & Baharom, S. (2018). Scientific Investigation through

Innovative Use of Mobile Devices in the Playground. Teaching Science: The

Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 64(2), 25-29.

 

Toyoda, S., Abe, N., & Arima, T. (2019). Nonreciprocal Refraction of Light in a

Magnetoelectric Material. Physical review letters, 123(7), 077401.

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.077401

 

Traxler, J. (2009). Current State of Mobile learning/Mobile learning: Transforming the

Delivery of Education and Training 1, 9-24. edt. by Mohamed Ally. Athabasca:

Athabasca University Press.

 

Tsai, C. Y., & Huang, T. C. (2018). The relationship between adult self-efficacy and

scientific competencies: the moderating effect of gender. International Journal

of Science and Mathematics Education, 16 (1), 91-106.

 

Tural, G. (2015). Cross-Grade Comparison of Students' Conceptual Understanding

with Lenses in Geometric Optics. Science Education International, 26(3), 325-

343.

 

Tyan, Y. S., Liao, J. R., Shen, C. Y., Lin, Y. C., & Weng, J. C. (2017). Gender

differences in the structural connectome of the teenage brain revealed by

generalized q-sampling MRI. NeuroImage: Clinical, 15, 376-382.

 

Ullman, T., Stuhlmüller, A., Goodman, N., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2014). Learning

Physics from dynamical scenes. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference

of the Cognitive Science society (pp. 1640-1645).

 

Valk, J. H., Rashid, A. T., & Elder, L. (2010). Using mobile phones to improve

educational outcomes: An analysis of evidence from Asia. International Review

of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 117-140.

 

Van Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing

Standard (through 2013), 16(40), 33.

 

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology

acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2),

186-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

 

Vitoria, L., Mislinawati, M., & Nurmasyitah, N. (2018). Students’ perceptions on the

implementation of e-learning: Helpful or unhelpful. Journal of Physics.:

Conference Series 1088, 012058. doi :10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012058

 

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Mind In Society, 52-58.

 

Wai, I. S. H., Ng, S. S. Y., Chiu, D. K., Ho, K. K., & Lo, P. (2018). Exploring

undergraduate students’ usage pattern of mobile apps for education. Journal of

Librarianship and Information Science, 50(1), 34-47.

 

Walls, D. F., & Milburn, G. J. (2007). Quantum optics. Springer Science & Business

Media.

 

Wan Husin, W. N. F., Mohamad Arsad, N., Othman, O., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S.,

Osman, K., & Iksan, Z. (2016). Fostering students' 21st century skills through

Project Oriented Problem Based Learning (POPBL) in integrated STEM

education program. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching,

17(1). Hong Kong.

 

Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age

and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of

Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118.

 

Weegar, M. A., & Pacis, D. (2012). A Comparison of two theories of learningbehaviourism

and constructivism as applied to face-to-face and online learning.

In Proceedings e-leader conference, Manila.

 

Weener, V. & Dirk-Gunnar, W. (2006). Quantum Physics. Wiley & Sons.

 

Wu, H., & Leung, S. O. (2017). Can likert scales be treated as interval scales?—A

simulation study. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(4), 527-532.

doi:10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775

 

Yahaya, A., Voo, P., Maakip, I., & Malek, M. D. A. (2017). Kaedah penyelidikan

dalam pendidikan. Tanjong Malim: Pejabat Karang Mengarang Universiti

Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Yahya, R. A. S., Daud, A. N. M., & Jaafar, R. (2019). Development and evaluation of

multiframes video recorded experiments as self-learning materials for

electricity topic. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1),

34-46.

 

Yennita, Y., Yasin, R. M., & Ikhsan, Z. H. (2017). Development of low cost project

base learning in physics learning of junior high school. Jurnal Geliga Sains

(JGS): Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika (Physics Education Journal), 5(1), 16-26.

 

Yeoh, M. P., & Ierardi, E. (2015). Motivation and achievement of Malaysian students

in studying Matriculation Biology. International Journal of Advanced

Research, 3(11), 966-978.

 

Yerdelen, S., Kahraman, N., & Yasemin, T. A. Ş. (2016). Low socioeconomic status

students' STEM career interest in relation to gender, grade level, and STEM

attitude. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(special), 59-74.

 

Yulastri, A., & Hidayat, H. (2017). Developing an entrepreneurship module by using

product-based learning approach in vocational education. International Journal

of Environmental and Science Education, 12(5), 1097-1109.

 

Yunus, M. A. M., Musa, R., & Nazri, M. Y. (2017). Construct and criterion validity of

the Malaysia version of Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Asia-

Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and

Technology, 10, 8-11.

 

Yusof, H., Yunus J., & Musa, K. (2015). Kaedah penyelidikan: Pengurusan

pendidikan. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Zain, A. R. (2018, September). Effectiveness of guided inquiry based on blended

learning in physics instruction to improve critical thinking skills of the senior

high school student. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series,1097(1), 012015.

IOP Publishing.

 

Zainal, N. F. A., Din, R., Nasrudin, M. F., Abdullah, S., Rahman, A. H. A., Abdullah,

S. N. H. S., ... & Majid, N. A. A. (2018). Robotic prototype and module

specification for increasing the interest of Malaysian students in STEM

Education. International. Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(25), 286-

290.

 

Zainuddin, I. (2017). Pembangunan modul pembelajaran seni reka grafik berasaskan

teknologi dan gaya pembelajaran pelajar bermasalah pendengaran (Doctoral

dissertation, University of Malaya). Retrieved from http://

studentsrepo.um.edu.my/7224/6/zainuddin.pdf

 

Zhai, X., & Shi, L. (2020). Understanding how the perceived usefulness of mobile

technology impacts physics learning achievement: A pedagogical

perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(6), 743-757.

 

Zhao, D., & Yang, Q. (2011). Blended learning model applied in college teacher

education. In Proceeding of the International Conference on e-Education,

Entertainment and e-Management (pp. 300-303). IEEE.

 

Zhu, D. H., Chang, Y. P., Luo, J. J., & Li, X. (2014). Understanding the adoption of

location-based recommendation agents among active users of social networking

sites. Information Processing & Management, 50(5), 675-682.