Biglu, M. H. (2008). The influence of references per paper in the SCI to impact factors and the matthew effect. Scientometrics, 74(3), 453-470. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1815-8
Bookstein, A., & Yitzhaki, M. (1999). Own-language preference: A new measure of "relative language self-citation". Scientometrics, 46(2), 337-348. doi:10.1007/BF02464782
Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2014). The wisdom of citing scientists. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(6), 1288-1292. doi:10.1002/asi.23100
Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404. doi:10.1002/asi.21419
Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co‐citation and word analysis. I. structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233-251. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42:4<233::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-I
Chen, C., & Hicks, D. (2004). Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics, 59(2), 199-211. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018528.59913.48
Chen, L. -., & Lien, Y. -. (2011). Using author co-citation analysis to examine the intellectual structure of e-learning: A MIS perspective. Scientometrics, 89(3), 867-886. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0458-y
Duan, Q. F., & Pan, X. H. (2018). Empirical research on impact of documents similarity upon scientific citation preference. Library and Information Service in China, 62(4), 97-106. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks. Scientometrics, 55(3), 349-361. doi:10.1023/A:1020458612014
Feng, Z. G., Li, C. L., Liu, X. H., & Fu, X. S. (2018). Interdisciplinary analysis of library and information science based on citing and cited reference information. Information Science, 36(3), 105-111. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Gao, J. (2017). Review and study of digital humanities intellectual structure. Library Tribune in China, 37(1), 1-9. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471-479. doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471
Garfield, E. (2004). Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 119-145. doi:10.1177/0165551504042802
Garfield, E. (1994). The impact factor. Current Contents, 25(25), 3-7. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Glanzel, W., & Czerwon, H. J. (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37(2), 195-221. doi:10.1007/BF02093621
Gong, K. L., Xie, J., Cheng, Y., & Meng, F. S. (2019). Internationalization of references in journal papers: An empirical study on library and information science. Information Science, 37(3), 127-135. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Hanney, S., Frame, I., Grant, J., Green, P., & Buxton, M. (2003). From Bench to Bedside: Tracing the Payback Forwards from Basic Or Early Clinical Research - A Preliminary Exercise and Proposals for A Future Study, HERG Research Report no.31, Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Hirsch, J. E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship. Scientometrics, 85(3), 741-754. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0193-9
Huang, M. -., & Chang, C. -. (2014). Detecting research fronts in OLED field using bibliographic coupling with sliding window. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1721-1744. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1126-1
Jarneving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65(2), 245-263. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0270-7
Jarneving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics, 65(2), 245-263. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0270-7
Jin, B. H., Wang, S. Y., Ren, S. L., & Liu, Y. J. (2000). On the relationship between journal impact factors and academic quality of papers. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 11(4), 202-205. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 251-263. doi:10.1002/asi.20274
Li, J. (2014). The concept and measurement of interdisciplinarity. Documentation, Information & Knowledge, 3thed, (3), 87-93. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Li, L., Liu, D. -., & Zhang, C. -. (2016). Research on evaluation of the academic impact of scientific papers based on the theory of knowledge flow. Information Science, 34(7), 113-119. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Liang, Y. D., Wang, X. Y., Luo, H. L., Ma, B. R., Li, Y., & Kui, Y. (2017). Metrology and visualization analysis of acupuncture and moxibustion related literature of web of science in the past 5 years by CiteSpace application. China J Trad Chin Med Pharm, 32, 2163-2168. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Liang, Y. X. (2012). Knowledge Graph of Citation Analysis, , 118. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Liu, J., & Adie, E. (2013). Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker's perspective. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(4), 31-34. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Liu, Y. M., Li, C. L., Feng, Z. G., & Liu, X. H. (2017). Discussion of improved p-index evaluating the academic quality of single paper. Library and Information Service in China, 61(21), 106-113. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Lu, W. H., & Li, Z. (2020). A comparative analysis of citation features of zero-cited and high-cited librarian thesis. Library Journal in China, 39(1), 76-84. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Ma, N., & Guan, J. C. (2006). Using citation analysis methods to identify the progress and prospects of research frontiers. Forum on Science and Technology in China, (4) Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Min, C., Ding, Y., Li, J., Bu, Y., Pei, L., & Sun, J. (2018). Innovation or imitation: The diffusion of citations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(10), 1271-1282. doi:10.1002/asi.24047
Newman, M. (2014). Introduction to Network Science, , 70-72. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-38. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1<31::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-G
Prathap, G. (2010). Is there a place for a mock h-index? Scientometrics, 84(1), 153-165. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0066-2
Qiu, J. P., & Yu, H. Q. (2013). Analysis of the situation of interdisciplinary research on library and information science in china from the perspective of interdisciplinary publication. Information Studies: Theory & Application in China, 36(5), 5-10. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Ren, S., & Rousseau, R. (2002). International visibility of chinese scientific journals. Scientometrics, 53(3), 389-405. doi:10.1023/A:1014877130166
Schiebel, E. (2012). Visualization of research fronts and knowledge bases by three-dimensional areal densities of bibliographically coupled publications and co-citations. Scientometrics, 91(2), 557-566. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0626-8
Schneider, J. W., & Costas, R. (2017). Identifying potential “breakthrough” publications using refined citation analyses: Three related explorative approaches. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 709-723. doi:10.1002/asi.23695
Shen, H. -., & Barabási, A. -. (2014). Collective credit allocation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(34), 12325-12330. doi:10.1073/pnas.1401992111
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., & Sakata, I. (2011). Detecting potential technological fronts by comparing scientific papers and patents. Foresight, 13(5), 51-60. doi:10.1108/14636681111170211
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2009). Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 571-580. doi:10.1002/asi.20994
Sidiropoulos, A., Gogoglou, A., Katsaros, D., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2016). Gazing at the skyline for star scientists. Journal of Informetrics, 10(3), 789-813. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.009
Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406
Small, H. (2006). Tracking and predicting growth areas in science. Scientometrics, 68(3), 595-610. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0132-y
Small, H., & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Social Studies of Science, 4(1), 17-40. doi:10.1177/030631277400400102
Su, C., Pan, Y., Zhen, Y., Ma, Z., Yuan, J., Guo, H., . . . Wu, Y. (2011). PrestigeRank: A new evaluation method for papers and journals. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.011
Su, C., Pan, Y. T., Ma, Z., Yuan, J. P., Yu, Z. L., & Guo, H. (2012). PrestigeRank and peer review for evaluation of scientific papers. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 31(2), 180-188. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1195-1225. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2
Takeda, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2009). Optics: A bibliometric approach to detect emerging research domains and intellectual bases. Scientometrics, 78(3), 543-558. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2012-5
Tang, L., Philip, S., & Jan, Y. (2016). Is there a clubbing effect underlying chinese research citation increases? Journal of Finance and Economics in China, 42(10), 94-107. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Tao, Y., Zhou, L., & Song, Y. H. (2017). The overview of co-citation and coupling in knowledge domain visualization. Library and Information Service in China, 61(11), 140-148. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Do altmetrics work? twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 8(5) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
Tol, R. S. J. (2009). The matthew effect defined and tested for the 100 most prolific economists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 420-426. doi:10.1002/asi.20968
Wang, C. H., & Chen, M. L. (2007). Analysis on the ten factors of the frequency of influencing academic thesis cited by others. Technology and Innovation Management in China, (4), 44-46. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Wang, F., Jia, C., Wang, X., Liu, J., Xu, S., Liu, Y., & Yang, C. (2019). Exploring all-author tripartite citation networks: A case study of gene editing. Journal of Informetrics, 13(3), 856-873. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2019.08.002
Wang, F. F., Wang, X. H., & Liu, Y. (2018). Evaluation of scholarly impact from an integrated perspective of three-dimensional citations: A case study of gene editing. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 37(6), 610-620. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Weinberg, B. H. (1974). Bibliographic coupling: A review. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10(5-6), 189-196. doi:10.1016/0020-0271(74)90058-8
Wu, J. H. (2011). Evaluation of journal impact and U-JI. Acta Editologica in China, 23(6), 552-554. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Xu, H. Y., & Fang, X. (2013). Study of evaluation index based on distribution and networks of citation for academic journals. Information Science in China, 31(2), 130-134. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Ye, F. Y., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). The "academic trace" of the performance matrix: A mathematical synthesis of the h-index and the integrated impact indicator (I3). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 742-750. doi:10.1002/asi.23075
Yoon, J., Chung, E., & Byun, J. (2015). An identification of the image retrieval domain from the perspective of library and information science with author co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analyses. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(4), 99-124. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Zhang, Y. H., & Pan, Y. T. (2007). Research infl uence of scientific papers related factors. Acta Editologica, 19(2), 81-84. Retrieved from www.scopus.com
Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070-2086. doi:10.1002/asi.20910
Zhao, Y., & Wu, Y. S. (2017). Tracing origins: A study on the characteristics of important literature cited by a famous scientometrician. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 36(11), 1099-1107. Retrieved from www.scopus.com