Examining the supervision work alliance scale: a rasch model approach

Suryana, Dodi

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	H Social Sciences (General)
ISSN :	1874-3501
Main Author :	Suryana, Dodi
Additional Authors :	Hapsah Md Yusof
Title :	Examining the supervision work alliance scale: a rasch model approach

Place of Production :	Tanjung Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :	2021
Notes :	Open Psychology Journal
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
HTTP Link :	Click to view web link

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Background: The supervisory working alliance has a role in facilitating guidance and counseling supervisors in providing understanding of how the service works. Measuring the level of supervision work alliance is one way that can be done to find out whether a supervisor has a good supervisory work alliance or not. Objective: The research aims to describe the quality of the Supervision Work Alliance Scale (SWAS) instrument. Materials and Methods: The study employed a cross-sectional method with a quantitative research design. Participants in this study were counseling teachers implementing the internship program with 17 males and 55 females. This type of parameter needs to be identified by the category coefficient of the RASCH scoring function model for polycotomic responses. Results: The results show that as many as 34 items proved to be compatible with SWAS instruments. The cronbach alpha of the instrument was 0.91 which means that the all items were in the high category of reliability. The misfit items were only 5,88, so all of the items in SWAS were well understood by the participants. Conclusion: The development of SWAS instrument is valid and reliable, so it can be used to measure the variable of the supervisory work alliance. ? 2021, Bentham Science Publishers. All rights reserved.

References

Abdullah, N., Noranee, S., & Khamis, M. R. (2017). The use of rasch wright map in assessing conceptual understanding of electricity. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(S), 81-88. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Adel, S. M. R., Davoudi, M., & Ramezanzadeh, A. (2016). A qualitative study of politeness strategies used by iranian EFL learners in a class blog. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 47-62. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Andrich, D. (2010). Rasch models. International encyclopedia of education (pp. 111-122) doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00258-X Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Beglar, D. (2010). A rasch-based validation of the vocabulary size test. Language Testing, 27(1), 101-118. doi:10.1177/0265532209340194

Bennett, C. S. (2008). Attachment-informed supervision for social work field education. Clinical Social Work Journal, 36(1), 97-107. doi:10.1007/s10615-007-0135-z

Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (1998). Fundamentals of Clinical Supervision, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Boone, W. J., Yale, M. S., & Staver, J. R. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Rasch analysis in the human sciences (pp. 1-482) doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4 Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11(1), 35-42. doi:10.1177/0011000083111007

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Crockett, S., & Hays, D. G. (2015). The influence of supervisor multicultural competence on the supervisory working alliance, supervisee counseling self-efficacy, and supervisee satisfaction with supervision: A mediation model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 54(4), 258-273. doi:10.1002/ceas.12025

Duruturk, N., Tonga, E., Gabel, C. P., Acar, M., & Tekindal, A. (2015). Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the turkish version of the lower limb functional index. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(26), 2439-2444. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1024342

Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(3), 322-329. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.37.3.322

Fisher, W. P. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 21(1) Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Fitch, J. C., Pistole, M. C., & Gunn, J. E. (2010). The bonds of development: An attachment-caregiving model of supervision. Clinical Supervisor, 29(1), 20-34. doi:10.1080/07325221003730319

Garner, C. M., Webb, L. K., Chaffin, C., & Byars, A. (2017). The soul of supervision: Counselor spirituality. Counseling and Values, 62(1), 24-36. doi:10.1002/cvj.12047

Gunn, J. E., & Carole Pistole, M. (2012). Trainee supervisor attachment: Explaining the alliance and disclosure in supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6(4), 229-237. doi:10.1037/a0030805

Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical Supervision: A Systems Approach, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Ladany, N., Friedlander, M. L., & Nelson, M. L. (2005). Critical events in psychotherapy supervision: An interpersonal approach. Critical Events in Psychotherapy Supervision: An Interpersonal Approach, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy, 38(4), 357-361. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.357

Logan, J. D. (2014). The Relationship among Counseling Supervision Satisfaction, Counselor Self-Efficacy, Working Alliance and Multicultural Factors ProQuest Diss Theses, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

McCarthy, A. K. (2013). Relationship between supervisory working alliance and client outcomes in state vocational rehabilitation counseling. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 57(1), 23-30. doi:10.1177/0034355213484177

Neswald-McCalip, R. (2001). Development of the secure counselor: Case examples supporting pistole & Watkins’s (1995) discussion of attachment theory in counseling supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41(1), 18-27. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2001.tb01265.x

Parcover, J. A., & Swanson, J. L. (2013). Career counselor training and supervision: Role of the supervisory working alliance. Journal of Employment Counseling, 50(4), 166-178. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1920.2013.00035.x

Perdana, S. (2018). Analisis kualitas instrumen pengukuran pemahaman konsep persamaan kuadrat melalui teori tes klasik dan rasch model. J Kiprah, 6(1), 41-48. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Pistole, M. C., & Fitch, J. C. (2008). Attachment theory in supervision: A critical incident experience. Counselor Education and Supervision, 47(3), 193-205. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2008.tb00049.x

Stout, J. L., Gorton, G. E., Novacheck, T. F., Bagley, A. M., Tervo, R. C., Bevans, K., & Tucker, C. A. (2012). Rasch analysis of items from two self-report measures of motor function: Determination of item difficulty and relationships with children's ability levels. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 54(5), 443-450. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04231.x

Strobl, C., Kopf, J., & Zeileis, A. (2015). Rasch trees: A new method for detecting differential item functioning in the rasch model. Psychometrika, 80(2), 289-316. doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9388-3

Sumintono, B. (2018). Rasch model measurements as tools in assessment for learning. Rasch Model Measurements as Tools in Assesment for Learning, , 38-42. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Susongko, P. (2016). Validation of science achievement test with the rasch model. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 268-277. doi:10.15294/jpii.v5i2.7690

Yasin, R. M., Yunus, F. A. N., Rus, R. C., Ahmad, A., & Rahim, M. B. (2015). Validity and reliability learning transfer item using rasch measurement model. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci, 204(2015), 212-217. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page